View Full Version : Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
Hell no he won't accept. He'll storm you with emojis and misdirection until Kyle wakes up.
called it
although I can’t believe he folded so quickly. Broke bitch.
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 05:28 PM
called it
although I can’t believe he folded so quickly. Broke bitch.
Not broke like your predictions that Susan Rice is laughing her ass off at.
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 05:29 PM
Guccifer 2.0 = Seth Rich :rollin
Not broke like your predictions that Susan Rice is laughing her ass off at.
incoherent nervous word salad
Last time I’ll ask. Do you accept the new terms? Yes or no.
Pavlov
11-13-2018, 05:30 PM
Damn, TSA really needs money.
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 05:30 PM
incoherent nervous word salad
Last time I’ll ask. Do you accept the new terms? Yes or no.
Look at him. He’s begging. You’ll eat when I tell you to, bitch.
I know Hillary didn't sell Putin uranium.
Do you know that?
From Snopes
Hillary Clinton played a part in the transaction insofar as it involved the transfer of ownership of a material deemed important to national security — uranium, amounting to one-fifth of U.S. reserves (a fraction re-estimated by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) at closer to one-tenth of the United States’ uranium production capacity in 2017) — thus requiring the approval of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), on which the U.S. Secretary of State sits.
Pavlov
11-13-2018, 05:33 PM
From Snopes
Hillary Clinton played a part in the transaction insofar as it involved the transfer of ownership of a material deemed important to national security — uranium, amounting to one-fifth of U.S. reserves (a fraction re-estimated by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) at closer to one-tenth of the United States’ uranium production capacity in 2017) — thus requiring the approval of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), on which the U.S. Secretary of State sits.I know Hillary didn't sell Putin uranium.
Do you know that, DMC?
called it
although I can’t believe he folded so quickly. Broke bitch.
None of these folks have a real job, so they don't have the finances to illustrate courage of conviction. They just were born in the troll era and think it's the best past time in existence.
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 05:33 PM
Lol dumbass skipped over “committee approval” which still doesn’t say Hillary’s approval
I know Hillary didn't sell Putin uranium.
Do you know that, DMC?
Prove it.
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 05:34 PM
https://scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/42741131_2525670330791632_8307847316161691648_n.jp g?_nc_cat=105&efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-1.xx&oh=ac8a91d439b9329a15e2dc67354d4073&oe=5C78C1F3
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 05:34 PM
The fat fuck has hand jaundice
Lol dumbass skipped over “committee approval” which still doesn’t say Hillary’s approval
The Sec of State sits on the committee.
Pavlov
11-13-2018, 05:34 PM
None of these folks have a real job, so they don't have the finances to illustrate courage of conviction. They just were born in the troll era and think it's the best past time in existence.The first time DMC worked up the courage to post a take he said Hillary sold uranium to Putin.
https://scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/42741131_2525670330791632_8307847316161691648_n.jp g?_nc_cat=105&efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-1.xx&oh=ac8a91d439b9329a15e2dc67354d4073&oe=5C78C1F3
There's your white flag :lmao
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 05:35 PM
The Sec of State sits on the committee.
Where does it say she approved?
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 05:35 PM
There's your white flag :lmao
And diabetes is yours.
Pavlov
11-13-2018, 05:35 PM
Prove it.:lmao demanding I prove a negative.
DerpMC
The owners of Uranium One sold Uranium One.
Where does it say she approved?
The committee approved. She sits on the committee. Ergo she approve. Her husband was given 500K by the Russians during this time.
There's never any way to prove bribery influenced anyone's decision, only that bribery happened. It happened.
Damn you Hillary supporters are salty as fuck...
:lol
Look at him. He’s begging. You’ll eat when I tell you to, bitch.
You’ll be exposed as a broke bitch with no confidence whenever I please. Case in point.
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 05:38 PM
The committee approved. She sits on the committee. Ergo she approve. Her husband was given 500K by the Russians during this time.
There's never any way to prove bribery influenced anyone's decision, only that bribery happened. It happened.
Damn you Hillary supporters are salty as fuck...
:lol
You said the committee approved. So Hillary didn’t sell it.
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 05:39 PM
You’ll be exposed as a broke bitch with no confidence whenever I please. Case in point.
If you need money that bad, then go toot it up on the corner.
Pavlov
11-13-2018, 05:40 PM
The committee approved. She sits on the committee. Ergo she approve. Her husband was given 500K by the Russians during this time.
There's never any way to prove bribery influenced anyone's decision, only that bribery happened. It happened.
Damn you Hillary supporters are salty as fuck...
:lolA bribe for nothing happened! Therefore bribery!
emojis good now.
You said the committee approved. So Hillary didn’t sell it.
Sure she did. Bill got 500K for it.
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 05:41 PM
A bribe for nothing happened! Therefore bribery!
emojis good now.
Lol
:lmao demanding I prove a negative.
DerpMC
The owners of Uranium One sold Uranium One.
You're claiming to know it. Burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim (you).
https://cdn.orkin.com/images/mosquitoes/mosquito-illustration_2092x1660.jpg
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 05:42 PM
Actually the burden is on you to prove your assertion.
Pavlov
11-13-2018, 05:43 PM
You're claiming to know it. Burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim (you).
https://cdn.orkin.com/images/mosquitoes/mosquito-illustration_2092x1660.jpgThe owners of Uranium One sold Uranium One.
There. I proved it.
Hillary sold uranium to him.
Prove it.
If you need money that bad, then go toot it up on the corner.
Only a broke bitch like yourself thinks the other party is betting because they need money.
Pavlov
11-13-2018, 05:45 PM
Only a broke bitch like yourself thinks the other party is betting because they need money.Only a broke bitch keeps begging for people to take message board bets.
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 05:45 PM
Only a broke bitch like yourself thinks the other party is betting because they need money.
Extra pissy at the suggestion you have no money eh?
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 05:46 PM
The owners of Uranium One sold Uranium One.
There. I proved it.
Prove it.
:lmao
The owners of Uranium One sold Uranium One.
There. I proved it.
Prove it.
Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion’s share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company’s Canadian founder.
Pavlov
11-13-2018, 05:51 PM
Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion’s share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company’s Canadian founder.Yeah, we went over this all over a year ago when TSA was pushing shit conspiracy theory.
From your snopes article you failed to link:
The Uranium One Deal Was Not Clinton’s to Veto or Approve
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
lol DerpMC
Hillary sold uranium to him.
Prove it.
I think I proved my point already Skeeter.
Extra pissy at the suggestion you have no money eh?
I’m not the one running from doubling the bet. You bit off more than you can chew. Deal with it and move on or keep exposing your lack of confidence and funds.
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 05:55 PM
I think I proved my point already Skeeter.
Lol no.
Pavlov
11-13-2018, 05:55 PM
I think I proved my point already Skeeter.:lol white flag
Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating proposed foreign acquisitions for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can’t veto a transaction; only the president can.
All nine federal agencies were required to approve the Uranium One transaction before it could go forward. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton “never intervened” in committee matters. Clinton herself has said she wasn’t personally involved.
lol DerpMC
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 05:56 PM
I’m not the one running from doubling the bet. You bit off more than you can chew. Deal with it and move on or keep exposing your lack of confidence and funds.
Literally begging for a bet. :lol
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 05:56 PM
:lol white flag
lol DerpMC
Oops
Literally begging for a bet. :lol
We already have a bet dipshit. Literally running from an offer to double your winnings.
:lol broke bitch
:lol no confidence
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 06:01 PM
We already have a bet dipshit. Literally running from an offer to double your winnings.
:lol broke bitch
:lol no confidence
you weren’t this desperate when you were pushing the book of Q. Guess you owe some money
Yeah, we went over this all over a year ago when TSA was pushing shit conspiracy theory.
From your snopes article you failed to link:
The Uranium One Deal Was Not Clinton’s to Veto or Approve
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
lol DerpMC
Prove it.
It’s funny you think the Uranium One is done being investigated, especially knowing the hardon Whitaker had for the Clinton’s corruption.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/prosecutors-ask-fbi-agents-info-uranium-one-deal-n831436
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 06:02 PM
It’s funny you think the Uranium One is done being investigated, especially knowing the hardon Whitaker had for the Clinton’s corruption.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/prosecutors-ask-fbi-agents-info-uranium-one-deal-n831436
:lmao :lmao :lmao :rollin
you weren’t this desperate when you were pushing the book of Q. Guess you owe some money
You’ve already passed up the opportunity to double your money. I’ve moved past the offer and am now just laughing at your no confidence having broke ass pass on it.
Chucho
11-13-2018, 06:05 PM
LOL, djohn afraid of TSA.
Pavlov
11-13-2018, 06:05 PM
It’s funny you think the Uranium One is done being investigated, especially knowing the hardon Whitaker had for the Clinton’s corruption.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/prosecutors-ask-fbi-agents-info-uranium-one-deal-n831436Dec. 21, 2017
What charges are you predicting against Clinton almost a year after bookmarking this story, TSA?
Be specific.
:lol white flag
lol DerpMC
Biased witness testimony
"never had veto power"
"all nine federal agencies were required to approve.."
Not approving = same as veto
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 06:06 PM
LOL, djohn afraid of TSA.
Already have a bet shithead :lol
Hell no he won't accept. He'll storm you with emojis and misdirection until Kyle wakes up.
:lmao :lmao :lmao :rollin
Chucho
11-13-2018, 06:07 PM
Already have a bet shithead :lol
So? Doesnt change the fact he came in and took your manhood right now, pussy.
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 06:08 PM
You’ve already passed up the opportunity to double your money. I’ve moved past the offer and am now just laughing at your no confidence having broke ass pass on it.
Susan Rice
Guccifer
Seth Rich
if you can’t stand talking about those L’s and wrong predictions, how are you going to be able to stand these and paying up?
Pavlov
11-13-2018, 06:09 PM
Biased witness testimony
"never had veto power"
"all nine federal agencies were required to approve.."
Not approving = same as veto:lmao
By law, the committee can’t veto a transaction; only the president can.
lol DerpMC
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 06:10 PM
So? Doesnt change the fact he came in and took your manhood right now, pussy.
Manhood on the internet. This kak thinks internet makes a man :rollin
Chucho
11-13-2018, 06:16 PM
Manhood on the internet. This kak thinks internet makes a man :rollin
Nope, you do. You tried clowning me about:
Low post count
Name not bolded
:lmao Had your manhood taken by a conspiracy nut.
:lmao Proven pussy by a conspiracy nut.
:lmao Dipshit hypocrite
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 06:16 PM
:lmao
lol DerpMC
Oops
Susan Rice
Guccifer
Seth Rich
if you can’t stand talking about those L’s and wrong predictions, how are you going to be able to stand these and paying up?
https://i.imgflip.com/2mhcuf.jpg
Chucho
11-13-2018, 06:17 PM
Susan Rice
Guccifer
Seth Rich
if you can’t stand talking about those L’s and wrong predictions, how are you going to be able to stand these and paying up?
Manhood on the internet. This kak thinks internet makes a man
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 06:19 PM
Nope, you do. You tried clowning me about:
Low post count
Name not bolded
:lmao :lmao :lmao you really took low post count personal
:lmao no life
After the last hour djohn is going on another Kavanaugh vacation
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 06:20 PM
After the last hour djohn is going on another Kavanaugh vacation
Not before I mention you to Susan Rice.
Chucho
11-13-2018, 06:22 PM
:lmao :lmao :lmao you really took low post count personal
:lmao no life
No, you did. LOL. Just like how you took me making fun of you about TSA taking your manhood and proving you a chickenshit.
Getting your skull fucked per par.
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 06:24 PM
No, you did. LOL. Just like how you took me making fun of you about TSA taking your manhood and proving you a chickenshit.
Getting your skull fucked per par.
You brought up post count and name bolding again like it personally made you leak fluids :lol
Hell no he won't accept. He'll storm you with emojis and misdirection until Kyle wakes up.
You brought up post count and name bolding again like it personally made you leak fluids :lol
You've reached your daily emoji limit.
:lmao
lol DerpMC
Just a different term. If they are required to approve, not approving is the same functionally as a veto, Skeeter.
Pavlov
11-13-2018, 06:28 PM
Here's guidance from the Treasury Department that was in charge of the review:
Only the President has the authority to suspend or prohibit a covered transaction. Pursuant to section 6(c) of Executive Order 11858, CFIUS refers a covered transaction to the President if CFIUS or any member of CFIUS recommends suspension or prohibition of the transaction, or if CFIUS otherwise seeks a Presidential
determination on the transaction.
In order to exercise the authority to suspend or prohibit a covered transaction under section 721, the President is required to make two findings: (1) That there is credible evidence that leads the President to believe that the foreign interest exercising control might take action that threatens to impair the national security; and (2) that provisions of law, other than section 721 and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (‘‘IEEPA’’), do not, in the judgment of the President, provide adequate and appropriate authority for the President to protect the national security.
https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/international/foreign-investment/Documents/CFIUSGuidance.pdf
TLDR version is lol DerpMC
Pavlov
11-13-2018, 06:32 PM
DerpMC's conspiracy theory is that the Russians bribed Clinton via her husband even though they didn't have to and didn't bribe the eight other cabinet members who could've easily "vetoed" the deal even though none of them can actually veto the deal -- meaning they should have been bribing Obama all along.
lol DerpMC
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 06:33 PM
DerpMC's conspiracy theory is that the Russians bribed Clinton via her husband even though they didn't have to and didn't bribe the eight other cabinet members who could've easily "vetoed" the deal even though none of them can actually veto the deal -- meaning they should have been bribing Obama all along.
lol DerpMC
:lol
Here's guidance from the Treasury Department that was in charge of the review:
https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/international/foreign-investment/Documents/CFIUSGuidance.pdf
TLDR version is lol DerpMC
"All nine federal agencies were required to approve the Uranium One transaction before it could go forward."
It has to get to the President
Are you fucking retarded? You are the one who posted the shit :lol
No, they cannot veto but the senate cannot veto either. They can just refuse to pass it. Veto refers to bills made by law making bodies.
Typical liberal wordplay.
:lol
Your ol' broke ass got exposed ITT
DerpMC's conspiracy theory is that the Russians bribed Clinton via her husband even though they didn't have to and didn't bribe the eight other cabinet members who could've easily "vetoed" the deal even though none of them can actually veto the deal -- meaning they should have been bribing Obama all along.
lol DerpMC
This makes a lot of sense. Hillary is the key, she has the ties to the POTUS. There's a reason 120+ million was funneled into the Clinton Foundation by the owner of the company. There's a reason Bill was paid half a million to talk, by a Russian agency. You pretending it's not relevant is just selective ignorance and blind eye partisanship.
Chucho
11-13-2018, 07:23 PM
You brought up post count and name bolding again like it personally made you leak fluids :lol
LOL, I would hope you're just ignoring your lies and hypocrisy, but you really, really are stupid. Like Chris, Derp, Boots, dabom levels of stupid, so you might honestly not realize you said those things with bloody vaginal discharge coming down your legs.
Lol, you got skullnfucked by TSA. :rollin
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 07:36 PM
LOL, I would hope you're just ignoring your lies and hypocrisy, but you really, really are stupid. Like Chris, Derp, Boots, dabom levels of stupid, so you might honestly not realize you said those things with bloody vaginal discharge coming down your legs.
Lol, you got skullnfucked by TSA. :rollin
I know you took post counts and bold names personal. For some odd and strange reason you feel some sort of self worth. But you aren’t. Not here or anywhere else. That’s why I give you attention. Once you log off you won’t matter anywhere. That’s why you beg.
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 07:40 PM
Your ol' broke ass got exposed ITT
So where did Hillary sell to Putin? :lol
You brought up post count and name bolding again like it personally made you leak fluids :lol
I know you took post counts and bold names personal. For some odd and strange reason you feel some sort of self worth. But you aren’t. Not here or anywhere else. That’s why I give you attention. Once you log off you won’t matter anywhere else Chico.
djohn taking a page from Skeeter's book about ad nauseum posting of bullshit narrative tangents. Keep it up, kohai.
So where did Hillary sell to Putin? :lol
I showed you already. Your eyes were removed and a penis was in your eye socket, explains why you didn't see it.
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 07:42 PM
https://scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/42741131_2525670330791632_8307847316161691648_n.jp g?_nc_cat=105&efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-1.xx&oh=ac8a91d439b9329a15e2dc67354d4073&oe=5C78C1F3
Y’all ever seen a nigga with no knuckles?
Pavlov
11-13-2018, 07:43 PM
This makes a lot of sense. Hillary is the key, she has the ties to the POTUS. There's a reason 120+ million was funneled into the Clinton Foundation by the owner of the company. There's a reason Bill was paid half a million to talk, by a Russian agency. You pretending it's not relevant is just selective ignorance and blind eye partisanship.It's your conspiracy theory, derpMC.
Hillary sold uranium to him.
Prove it.
lol
Pavlov
11-13-2018, 07:44 PM
This makes a lot of sense. Hillary is the key, she has the ties to the POTUS. There's a reason 120+ million was funneled into the Clinton Foundation by the owner of the company. There's a reason Bill was paid half a million to talk, by a Russian agency. You pretending it's not relevant is just selective ignorance and blind eye partisanship.It makes zero sense.
What is the reason you've determined Clinton should have vetoed the deal even though she couldn't?
Y’all ever seen a nigga with no knuckles?
I've seen your picture. You're a fat Asian kid so you've nary room.
It makes zero sense.
What is the reason you've determined Clinton should have vetoed the deal even though she couldn't?
Where did I say she should have? Where did I even mention the term "veto"? That's your red herring, typical liberal misdirection and something you've set about jousting shortly after you erected it.
Spurs Homer
11-13-2018, 07:50 PM
Y’all ever seen a nigga with no knuckles?
:vomit::vomit:
Holeee shit!
Fat hands really triggered - even went to his alt - chooch
:lol:lol
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 07:51 PM
https://scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/42741131_2525670330791632_8307847316161691648_n.jp g?_nc_cat=105&efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-1.xx&oh=ac8a91d439b9329a15e2dc67354d4073&oe=5C78C1F3
What is that?
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 07:52 PM
:vomit::vomit:
Holeee shit!
Fat hands really triggered - even went to his alt - chooch
:lol:lol
:lol
Spurs Homer
11-13-2018, 07:53 PM
What is that?
First stages of something rotting badly!
:cry:cry
:lol djohn triggered, repetitive posting an image he thinks bothers me, one I've posted myself several times.
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 07:54 PM
First stages of something rotting badly!
:cry:cry
It’s fucking yellow...
Spurs Homer
11-13-2018, 07:56 PM
It’s fucking yellow...
Almost orange - like trumps face
maybe this is why he fights so hard for dear leader?
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 07:57 PM
Almost orange - like trumps face
maybe this is why he fights so hard for dear leader?
CROFL
Spurs Homer
11-13-2018, 07:57 PM
:lol djohn triggered, repetitive posting an image he thinks bothers me, one I've posted myself several times.
Bruh -
seriously -have you gotten checked?
I'd walk over-
er - RUN over to the doc - asap!
It’s fucking yellow...
You think we could be related?
:lol a full page of "ur fat" responses from RG's alt and TSA's plastic fuck doll.
Chucho
11-13-2018, 08:10 PM
:vomit::vomit:
Holeee shit!
Fat hands really triggered - even went to his alt - chooch
:lol:lol
LOL, you think I'm DMC.
Trump made you create a meltdown alt AND cast your lot with djohn. :lol
Chucho
11-13-2018, 08:11 PM
Spurs Homer acts like Boots...must've been raped by their fathers wearing Trump masks. These are the kind of people who turned people onto Trump.
Spurs Homer
11-13-2018, 08:12 PM
LOL, you think I'm DMC.
Trump made you create a meltdown alt AND cast your lot with djohn. :lol
hey a cult member admitting he is in a cult and - what else - defending Trump and his other cult members!
Spurs Homer acts like Boots...must've been raped by their fathers wearing Trump masks. These are the kind of people who turned people onto Trump.
I don't think Boots has any alts. Too unstable to carry on a conversation.
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 08:17 PM
LOL, you think I'm DMC.
Trump made you create a meltdown alt AND cast your lot with djohn. :lol
Might wanna guess who is behind it. Not me.
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 08:18 PM
https://scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/46200366_2624950764196921_8700386320331046912_n.jp g?_nc_cat=106&efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-1.xx&oh=ed901e2b250bec00993c041bc50bdffb&oe=5C681F82
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 08:18 PM
Spurs Homer you right it is orange
I know who Spurs Homer is...
Where's Glenn these days??
:lol
Will Hunting
11-13-2018, 08:23 PM
I know who Spurs Homer is...
Where's Glenn these days??
:lol
Glenn H:lolbart?
Glenn H:lolbart?
His partner in crime
:lol a full page of "ur fat" responses from RG's alt and TSA's plastic fuck doll.
RG done ground game canvassing and running two tabs in the political forum
dbroke0000 just clutching at straws
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 08:25 PM
RG done ground game canvassing and running two tabs in the political forum
dbroke0000 just clutching at straws
It’s “grasping” at straws you dumb fuck :lol
djohn in bed with Silverblk Mystix 2.0
a pic of djohn tonight would be an lol /thread
:bobo
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 08:33 PM
a pic of djohn tonight would be an lol /thread
:bobo
wont stop Trump from Prison :toast
Spurs Homer
11-13-2018, 08:36 PM
Spurs Homer (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=52221) you right it is orange
lol
triggered cult!
wont stop Trump from Prison :toast
Says the broke bitch that has no confidence to double that bet :lmao
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 08:39 PM
Says the broke bitch that has no confidence to double that bet :lmao
You don’t have the confidence to list what you have been right about.
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 08:39 PM
lol
triggered cult!
I might put it in my sig
Spurs Homer
11-13-2018, 08:41 PM
I might put it in my sig
I guess that video debunking the uranium and the hand pics did it!
Chucho
11-13-2018, 08:41 PM
hey a cult member admitting he is in a cult and - what else - defending Trump and his other cult members!
LOL, how'd you arrive at that genius? Everyone who makes fun of you is a Trump Cultist, apparently. Derp has someone reading from the derptionary.
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 08:42 PM
I guess that video debunking the uranium and the hand pics did it!
Yep
Chucho
11-13-2018, 08:43 PM
You don’t have the confidence to list what you have been right about.
He's on par with you; 0. 0 things right about. The difference? He took your manhood.
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 08:45 PM
He's on par with you; 0. 0 things right about. The difference? He took your manhood.
I know for a fact some years back, you said someone took your wife, DMC.
Chucho
11-13-2018, 08:45 PM
Might wanna guess who is behind it. Not me.
That's the difference, I don't care, you do. I'm not an ST life faggot who jumps into a closet of alts when someone gets some jabs in.
Chucho
11-13-2018, 08:46 PM
I know for a fact some years back, you said someone took your wife, DMC.
So DMC should start a support group with Blake then?
Spurs Homer
11-13-2018, 08:46 PM
That's the difference, I don't care, you do. I'm not an ST life faggot who jumps into a closet of alts when someone gets some jabs in.
ok mr chunky hands
I guess that video debunking the uranium and the hand pics did it!
You're one of the fattest people who ever posted on this forum. :lol
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 08:47 PM
That's the difference, I don't care, you do. I'm not an ST life faggot who jumps into a closet of alts when someone gets some jabs in.
You already put a guess out :lol
I know for a fact some years back, you said someone took your wife, DMC.
I wish
Spurs Homer
11-13-2018, 08:52 PM
You're one of the fattest people who ever posted on this forum. :lol
lol triggered
go get checked asap!
You don’t have the confidence to list what you have been right about.
You’re a broke bitch with no confidence. How’s that for being right about something?
You're one of the fattest people who ever posted on this forum. :lol
cmon man enough with the tease
If you got em post em
AaronY
11-13-2018, 09:01 PM
Such is life on Spurstalk
djohn2oo8
11-13-2018, 09:02 PM
You’re a broke bitch with no confidence. How’s that for being right about something?
Funny after all of that you asked for the bet again. Get on your knees and ask again.
lol triggered
go get checked asap!
You know - I have - you by the short - hairs.
Winehole23
11-13-2018, 09:58 PM
Lemons not worth the squeeze, tbh
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 05:44 AM
Where did I say she should have? Where did I even mention the term "veto"? That's your red herring, typical liberal misdirection and something you've set about jousting shortly after you erected it.:lmao denying you ever used the word veto.
Brazil
11-14-2018, 08:58 AM
Such is life on Spurstalk
:lol
Biased witness testimony
"never had veto power"
"all nine federal agencies were required to approve.."
Not approving = same as veto
:lmao denying you ever used the word veto.
First time in this thread I mentioned the word "veto" and it was quoting your post.
So show me where I suggested Hillary should have vetoed it.
boutons_deux
11-14-2018, 01:06 PM
DOJ justifies appointment of unconfirmed AG by citing 1866 case that almost resulted in a president's impeachment
President Andrew Johnson appointed Henry Stanberry to attorney general without Senate approval,
which was actually a major factor in his impeachment. :lol
https://www.alternet.org/doj-justifies-appointment-unconfirmed-ag-citing-1866-case-almost-resulted-presidents-impeachment
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 01:17 PM
First time in this thread I mentioned the word "veto" and it was quoting your post.
So show me where I suggested Hillary should have vetoed it.
So no reason to bribe anyone.
So no reason to bribe anyone.
Show me where I suggested Hillary should have vetoed it or retract your claim.
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 02:35 PM
Show me where I suggested Hillary should have vetoed it or retract your claim.I never said you did -- just pointing out that simple fact skull fucks your bribe conspiracy theory.
There was zero reason to bribe anyone.
Show me where Hillary sold uranium to Putin or retract your claim.
:lmao denying you ever used the word veto.
I never said you did -- just pointing out that simple fact skull fucks your bribe conspiracy theory.
There was zero reason to bribe anyone.
Show me where Hillary sold uranium to Putin or retract your claim.
:lol
It makes zero sense.
What is the reason you've determined Clinton should have vetoed the deal even though she couldn't?
:lol
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 04:15 PM
Show me where I suggested Hillary should have vetoed it or retract your claim.
I never said you did -- just pointing out that simple fact skull fucks your bribe conspiracy theory.
There was zero reason to bribe anyone.
Show me where Hillary sold uranium to Putin or retract your claim.:rollin DerpMC desperately lying
spurraider21
11-14-2018, 04:16 PM
:lol
wow, you're a dishonest fuck :lol
Show me where I suggested Hillary should have vetoed it or retract your claim.
I never said you did -- just pointing out that simple fact skull fucks your bribe conspiracy theory.
There was zero reason to bribe anyone.
Show me where Hillary sold uranium to Putin or retract your claim.
your use of the word veto =/= your suggestion that clinton should have vetoed it
It's right there for anyone who cares to read it. The need to drag you back to the truth and beat you over your stupid head with it over and over his why most people won't have a conversation with you here.
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 04:20 PM
It's right there for anyone who cares to read it.Yep, spurraider21 just did.
:lmao why did you think you'd get away with such obvious lying, DerpMC?
wow, you're a dishonest fuck :lol
your use of the word veto =/= your suggestion that clinton should have vetoed it
My point was not about whether or not anybody passed it but that they didn't mind doing business with Russia then. That's why I posted all of the images of different leaders with Putin. So you're just semen shielding as always for the forum mosquito. Maybe stay in your lane which is usually the median between the lines.
Yep, spurraider21 just did.
:lmao why did you think you'd get away with such obvious lying, DerpMC?
Yes he has a history of being fair and balanced. He's not a sniper at all.
djohn2oo8
11-14-2018, 04:22 PM
Yet you said Hillary sold it...
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 04:23 PM
My point was not about whether or not anybody passed it but that they didn't mind doing business with Russia then. That's why I posted all of the images of different leaders with Putin. So you're just semen shielding as always for the forum mosquito. Maybe stay in your lane which is usually the median between the lines.Defensive forum cop mode engaged.
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 04:24 PM
Yes he has a history of being fair and balanced. He's not a sniper at all.:lolYou said Hillary sold uranium to Putin.
Oh lookie the echo chamber is back. Today on Echo Chamber Philo joins the crew. What's the odds he will have anything different to say? Stay tuned to find out.
Yet you said Hillary sold it...
Show some pictures of my hand again, you were winning for a while.
Defensive forum cop mode engaged.
Skeeter mode engaged
djohn2oo8
11-14-2018, 04:28 PM
Show some pictures of my hand again, you were winning for a while.
Did she sell it or not?
:lolYou said Hillary sold uranium to Putin.
Well if I don't need to use the word veto for you to claim I said veto then Hillary doesn't need to have a direct transaction with Putin to make the claim that she sold something to him true.
Did she sell it or not?
Hand or nothing
djohn2oo8
11-14-2018, 04:33 PM
Hand or nothing
Did she sell it to Putin or not?
Did she sell it to Putin or not?
Skeeter 2.0
Second day into the hillary sold Russia Uranium debate. :lmao
Second day into the hillary sold Russia Uranium debate. :lmao
Oh lookie Mz McFeely drops by the Echo Chamber.
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 04:38 PM
Well if I don't need to use the word veto for you to claim I said veto then Hillary doesn't need to have a direct transaction with Putin to make the claim that she sold something to him true.
Biased witness testimony
"never had veto power"
"all nine federal agencies were required to approve.."
Not approving = same as veto
Just a different term. If they are required to approve, not approving is the same functionally as a veto, Skeeter.
lol "never used the term"
Oh lookie Mz McFeely drops by the Echo Chamber.
Just dropping by to laugh at your inability to move on and continually get shit on.
Please continue.
lol "never used the term"
It's taken from your post, idiot. :lol
Once again you created the narrative that I claimed Hillary should have vetoed something, then you accuse me of using the term as proof yet the posts clearly show you used it first. I was arguing against something you were saying.
Your posts clearly showed that the nine federal agencies were required to approve the sale. You ignored that and instead went right to the word "veto" in a word play attempt to shift the narrative.
You're so easy to thwart, just look for the misdirection in 2nd or 3rd response.
My point was not about whether or not anybody passed it but that they didn't mind doing business with Russia then. That's why I posted all of the images of different leaders with Putin. So you're just semen shielding as always for the forum mosquito. Maybe stay in your lane which is usually the median between the lines.
Completely ignored post.
:lol
The Narrative Crew:
Skeeter (ring leader)
Philo (median sniper)
Reck (Cross dressing comedy relief)
djohn (Token Asian conspiratard)
Scattered guest appearances from the Echo Chamber
:lol
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 05:28 PM
It's taken from your post, idiot. :lol
Once again you created the narrative that I claimed Hillary should have vetoed something, then you accuse me of using the term as proof yet the posts clearly show you used it first. I was arguing against something you were saying.
Your posts clearly showed that the nine federal agencies were required to approve the sale. You ignored that and instead went right to the word "veto" in a word play attempt to shift the narrative.
You're so easy to thwart, just look for the misdirection in 2nd or 3rd response.You said Hillary sold uranium to Putin.
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 05:28 PM
Completely ignored post.You said Hillary sold uranium to Putin.
It makes zero sense.
What is the reason you've determined Clinton should have vetoed the deal even though she couldn't?
You said Hillary sold uranium to Putin.
Here is your 1st attempt at creating a false narrative (in bold).
Now you're trying to go back to the original topic. Let's put your false narrative to reset first, Skeeter.
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 05:30 PM
Here is your 1st attempt at creating a false narrative.
Now you're trying to go back to the original topic. Let's put your false narrative to reset first, Skeeter.She would have to have a reason to veto the deal in order to be bribed to not veto it, DerpMC.
Your narrative is Hillary Clinton sold uranium to Putin.
She would have to have a reason to veto the deal in order to be bribed to not veto it, DerpMC.
Your narrative is Hillary Clinton sold uranium to Putin.
Yet another false narrative from you.
The only time I've used the word "bribed" since 2015 would be me quoting you.
https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=266387&page=1295&p=9598254&highlight=bribe#post9598254
Your need to paraphrase and create narrative from your own tail chasing is amazing.
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 05:42 PM
Yet another false narrative from you.
The only time I've used the word "bribed" since 2015 would be me quoting you.
https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=266387&page=1295&p=9598254&highlight=bribe#post9598254
Your need to paraphrase and create narrative from your own tail chasing is amazing.
:lmao DerpMC tees another one up for me.
The committee approved. She sits on the committee. Ergo she approve. Her husband was given 500K by the Russians during this time.
There's never any way to prove bribery influenced anyone's decision, only that bribery happened. It happened.
Damn you Hillary supporters are salty as fuck...
:lol
Your ability to shit on yourself is amazing.
spurraider21
11-14-2018, 05:49 PM
inb4 "bribed" is not the same as "bribery"
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 05:51 PM
inb4 "bribed" is not the same as "bribery"My narrative is he did a word search that didn't include that variant.
spurraider21
11-14-2018, 05:55 PM
Yes he has a history of being fair and balanced. He's not a sniper at all.
are you saying i misinterpreted your post and the post you were replying to? or are you just taking a shot from a distance aka sniping
djohn2oo8
11-14-2018, 06:07 PM
1062842645804912642
lawdy!
Spurs Homer
11-14-2018, 06:40 PM
1062842645804912642
lawdy!
Indict this asshole already. Let's get the entire criminal organization indicted and removed from our gov't.
Spurs Homer
11-14-2018, 06:46 PM
Flake stepping up to the plate again. Saying if McConnell won't protect Mueller -
no more judges get approved!
https://investigaterussia.org/media/2018-11-14/flake-and-coons-aim-force-mueller-bill-vote
Spurs Homer
11-14-2018, 06:55 PM
Stone: "My hero Assange will educate the American Public"
:cry:cry:cry
https://investigaterussia.org/media/2018-11-14/tale-texts
Flake stepping up to the plate again. Saying if McConnell won't protect Mueller -
no more judges get approved!
https://investigaterussia.org/media/2018-11-14/flake-and-coons-aim-force-mueller-bill-vote
This guy. :lol
Flake is such a confused individual. Whatever he says hold little to no water. Even less now.
:lol Auditioning for a CNN gig.
Spurs Homer
11-14-2018, 07:10 PM
This guy. :lol
Flake is such a confused individual. Whatever he says hold little to no water. Even less now.
:lol Auditioning for a CNN gig.
if flake doesnt flake - mcconnell has to either put muellers bill on the floor
or
tell trump
no more judges
lol
if flake doesnt flake - mcconnell has to either put muellers bill on the floor
or
tell trump
no more judges
lol
Or he could just wait out the lame duck session to end which is like a month and some days long. The turtle waited almost a year to get a supreme court judge that he likes. What do you think he'll do this time? Panic?
Or he could just wait out the lame duck session to end which is like a month and some days long. The turtle waited almost a year to get a supreme court judge that he likes. What do you think he'll do this time? Panic?
1062777294568058880
inb4 "bribed" is not the same as "bribery"
More out of context retorts from the forum sniper. The article states "there's no proof that the donation influenced the decision". I was responding to that with an analogy. There no way to proof any bribery influences a decision. There's no way to prove Russians influencing the election affected the outcome. That's never the goal, to prove the effect, only to show it happened and common sense then dictates people don't give money like that away for no return.
But keep looking for token points Philo while being dishonest in the process. You're a lawyer after all. :lol
Spurs Homer
11-14-2018, 07:26 PM
Or he could just wait out the lame duck session to end which is like a month and some days long. The turtle waited almost a year to get a supreme court judge that he likes. What do you think he'll do this time? Panic?
no
but
these weeks before the dems get power is the gop’s chance at all kinds of fuckery and jamming a bunch of corrupt judges
before anyone can stop them is exactly mcconnells modus operandi
the fact that another gop guy is strongarming mcconnell will really get his panties in a twist
My point was not about whether or not anybody passed it but that they didn't mind doing business with Russia then. That's why I posted all of the images of different leaders with Putin. So you're just semen shielding as always for the forum mosquito. Maybe stay in your lane which is usually the median between the lines.
are you saying i misinterpreted your post and the post you were replying to? or are you just taking a shot from a distance aka sniping
Seem pretty cut and dry to me. You engaged me, how could I be sniping at you? :lol
But you never follow up. You typically just regress back into the forage of the forum until you see an opening. I don't expect much from you other than scoreboard posting.
Nervous laughter. 4 emojis. Niggas is shook.
:lmao :lmao :lmao :rollin
:lol
spurraider21
11-14-2018, 07:37 PM
Seem pretty cut and dry to me. You engaged me, how could I be sniping at you? :lol
you were dishonest AF in post #38911 and you got called out for it. you then spun it into "but philo isn't objective!" just taking shots with no substance. trying to snipe.
But you never follow up. You typically just regress back into the forage of the forum until you see an opening. I don't expect much from you other than scoreboard posting.
this is your narrative
spurraider21
11-14-2018, 07:37 PM
:lol
:lol gotem
spurraider21
11-14-2018, 07:38 PM
More out of context retorts from the forum sniper. The article states "there's no proof that the donation influenced the decision". I was responding to that with an analogy. There no way to proof any bribery influences a decision. There's no way to prove Russians influencing the election affected the outcome. That's never the goal, to prove the effect, only to show it happened and common sense then dictates people don't give money like that away for no return.
But keep looking for token points Philo while being dishonest in the process. You're a lawyer after all. :lol
lol moving goalposts.
your claim: i never used the word bribed
truth: you did
that's all that post was about. now you're deflecting and changing the topic, something you've complained about quite a bit recently
you were dishonest AF in post #38911 and you got called out for it. you then spun it into "but philo isn't objective!" just taking shots with no substance. trying to snipe.
this is your narrative
You're one of the worst paraphrasing faggots here. You prefer to put words in people's mouths instead of responding to what they actually said. See example in your post above. This seems to be a common tactic with the left. What's wrong, is the quote function just too hard to use?
lol moving goalposts.
your claim: i never used the word bribed
truth: you did
that's all that post was about. now you're deflecting and changing the topic, something you've complained about quite a bit recently
No I didn't. You know that already which is why you tried to head it off with "ib4.."
spurraider21
11-14-2018, 07:43 PM
You're one of the worst paraphrasing faggots here. You prefer to put words in people's mouths instead of responding to what they actually said. See example in your post above. This seems to be a common tactic with the left. What's wrong, is the quote function just too hard to use?
oh no, i said objective instead of "fair and balanced"
totally misrepresented you
oh no, i said objective instead of "fair and balanced"
totally misrepresented you
Quoting is so hard:cry
spurraider21
11-14-2018, 07:45 PM
No I didn't. You know that already which is why you tried to head it off with "ib4.."
no you didn't what? be specific. you didnt use the word bribed? or you didn't claim to not have used the word bribed
it sounds silly to ask but you've been consistently dishonest and just want to pin down what you claim to be claiming
spurraider21
11-14-2018, 07:47 PM
Quoting is so hard:cry
:lol panic edits
please explain how i misrepresented you there.
how is "philo isn't objective" misrepresenting your post where you said "yes he has a history of being fair and balanced"
lay it out for me
spurraider21
11-14-2018, 07:48 PM
DMC keeps changing topics per par... anything to avoid his "clinton sold uranium to putin" narrative
no you didn't what? be specific. you didnt use the word bribed? or you didn't claim to not have used the word bribed
it sounds silly to ask but you've been consistently dishonest and just want to pin down what you claim to be claiming
You using "Ib4..." then trying to create a conversation to bring your take to fruition = :lol
You know damn well I never said "bribed". Otherwise you would never have posted "inb4 "bribed" is not the same as "bribery"'.
Now you want me to use that exact same statement so you can :lol
Trying to set a trap for me. :cry so dishonest
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 07:49 PM
No I didn't. You know that already which is why you tried to head it off with "ib4.."
Typical liberal wordplay.
:lmao DerpMC
DMC keeps changing topics per par... anything to avoid his "clinton sold uranium to putin" narrative
3rd person narrating to imaginary audience.
Today's Philo
You must address one thing at a time. You want to stop at that, but the root topic is doing business with Putin and Russia.
I won't let you squirm out of that, none of you.
djohn2oo8
11-14-2018, 07:52 PM
Hmmm now he doesn’t want to discuss it
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 07:52 PM
3rd person narrating to imaginary audience.
Today's Philo
You must address one thing at a time. You want to stop at that, but the root topic is doing business with Putin and Russia.
I won't let you squirm out of that, none of you.Your claim was and still is that Clinton sold uranium to Putin.
I won't let you squirm out of that.
Prove it.
boutons_deux
11-14-2018, 07:52 PM
Bitch McC just signalled to Trash that Mueller is not protected, so fire away.
:lmao DerpMC
Is it harder to type "bribery"?
Why must you two insist on using the wrong word? Not my problem.
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 07:54 PM
Hmmm now he doesn’t want to discuss itHe's trying to keep everyone in the "bribed be different from bribery" weeds. Typical DerpMC wordplay.
djohn2oo8
11-14-2018, 07:54 PM
Is it harder to type "bribery"?
Why must you two insist on using the wrong word? Not my problem.
Who bribed who? Explain.
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 07:55 PM
Is it harder to type "bribery"?You certainly couldn't do it in your word search, genius.
lol DerpMC
Business was conducted between the Clintons and Russian agencies, while Obama was in the WH. Russia was good then.
Trump took office
Russia bad now
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 07:57 PM
Who bribed who? Explain.You mean "Who bribery-ed whom?"
Who bribed who? Explain.
This is why you want to change the word, so you can follow with that.
Nuh uh. I never said it. Next.
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 07:59 PM
Business was conducted between the Clintons and Russian agencies, while Obama was in the WH. Russia was good then.
Trump took office
Russia bad now
Hillary sold uranium to him.
Your non sequitur post quotes
The New York Times reported in 2015 that "shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, [former President Bill] Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock." In total, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from interests linked to Uranium One, which was acquired by the Russian government nuclear agency Rosatum.
-Chicago Tribune
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 08:01 PM
This is why you want to change the word, so you can follow with that.
Nuh uh. I never said it. Next.
The committee approved. She sits on the committee. Ergo she approve. Her husband was given 500K by the Russians during this time.
There's never any way to prove bribery influenced anyone's decision, only that bribery happened. It happened.
Damn you Hillary supporters are salty as fuck...
:lol:lol
The New York Times reported in 2015 that "shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, [former President Bill] Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock." In total, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from interests linked to Uranium One, which was acquired by the Russian government nuclear agency Rosatum.
-Chicago Tribune
:lol New York Times
:lol Chicago Tribune
^Still nothing in the way of proof that I said Hillary was bribed.
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 08:02 PM
^Still nothing in the way of proof that I said Hillary was bribed.
The committee approved. She sits on the committee. Ergo she approve. Her husband was given 500K by the Russians during this time.
There's never any way to prove bribery influenced anyone's decision, only that bribery happened. It happened.
Damn you Hillary supporters are salty as fuck...
:lol:lol
djohn2oo8
11-14-2018, 08:24 PM
:lol
But he never said it :lmao
:lol
Still.. never said it.
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 08:25 PM
Still.. never said it.Yes you did. I quoted your saying it.
:lol DerpMC
But he never said it :lmao
I didn't say it. The Chicago Tribune the NYT said it though. I just said bribery happened.
Yep, I quoted your saying it.
:lol DerpMC
Your incessant desire to create narrative and put words in people's mouths leads you to these mistakes.
Are you a reporter by chance?
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 08:27 PM
The Chicago Tribune the NYT said it though.They didn't say anyone was bribed.
You did.
You also said Hillary sold uranium to Putin.
lol DerpMC
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 08:27 PM
Your incessant desire to create narrative and put words in people's mouths leads you to these mistakes.
Are you a reporter by chance?I quoted you, dipshit.
:lmao
They didn't say anyone was bribed.
You did.
You also said Hillary sold uranium to Putin.
lol DerpMC
I just said it happened. They said how it happened, from whom to to whom. Take that up with them.
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 08:28 PM
I just said it happened. They said how it happened, from whom to to whom. Take that up with them.They didn't say anyone was bribed.
You did.
Only you.
No one else.
I'm taking that up with you.
I quoted you, dipshit.
:lmao
You quoting me and saying something that's not in the quote. That's unique.
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 08:30 PM
You quoting me and saying something that's not in the quote. That's unique.Nope. I quoted you directly.
It's all there for everyone to see.
You just did a great job of shitting on yourself.:bobo
They didn't say anyone was bribed.
You did.
Only you.
No one else.
I'm taking that up with you.
False premise
It's not been established that I ever said it. You've not satisfied the requirement to post a quote that accurately mirrors/reflects what you claim I said. Inferring and interpreting isn't necessary where actual quotes are available.
Nope. I quoted you directly.
It's all there for everyone to see.
You just did a great job of shitting on yourself.:bobo
You did quote me directly however what you claim I said isn't in the quote.
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 08:42 PM
False premise
It's not been established that I ever said it. You've not satisfied the requirement to post a quote that accurately mirrors/reflects what you claim I said. Inferring and interpreting isn't necessary where actual quotes are available.
The committee approved. She sits on the committee. Ergo she approve. Her husband was given 500K by the Russians during this time.
There's never any way to prove bribery influenced anyone's decision, only that bribery happened. It happened.
Damn you Hillary supporters are salty as fuck...
:lol
Hillary sold uranium to him.
:lmao
boutons_deux
11-14-2018, 08:43 PM
Flake Threatens To Block Judicial Nominees Until Senate Votes On Mueller Bill
After
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) declined to bring a bill
aimed at protecting special counsel Robert Mueller to the Senate floor for a vote,
Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) threatened to oppose all judicial nominees.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/flake-block-nominees-mueller-bill?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20tpm-news%20%28TPMNews%29
:lmao
Moving the goalposts now
Where did I say Hillary was bribed?
I always wipe the floor with you, thus your stream of emojis and name calling.
djohn2oo8
11-14-2018, 08:46 PM
Moving the goalposts now
Where did I say Hillary was bribed?
I always wipe the floor with you, thus your stream of emojis and name calling.
You said bribery happened and then laughed at “salty Hillary fans”
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 08:47 PM
You did quote me directly however what you claim I said isn't in the quote.Oh, who are you saying was bribed?
Who did the bribing?
What was the bribe for?
Let's clear this up once and for all.
Be very specific so I can quote you directly from here on out.
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 08:47 PM
Moving the goalposts now
Where did I say Hillary was bribed?
I always wipe the floor with you, thus your stream of emojis and name calling.
Oh, who are you saying was bribed?
Who did the bribing?
What was the bribe for?
Let's clear this up once and for all.
Be very specific so I can quote you directly from here on out.
You said bribery happened and then laughed at “salty Hillary fans”
Yes. The lot of you are Hillary supporters. You're salty over the loss. Bribery did happen. I didn't say from whom and to whom.
Your confirmation bias attempted to fill in the gaps, to the point where you actually changed my words. Typical left tactics.
Thanks for playing.
djohn2oo8
11-14-2018, 08:49 PM
So who was bribed?
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 08:49 PM
Yes. The lot of you are Hillary supporters. You're salty over the loss. Bribery did happen. I didn't say from whom and to whom.
Your confirmation bias attempted to fill in the gaps, to the point where you actually changed my words. Typical left tactics.
Thanks for playing.Oh, who are you saying was bribed?
Who did the bribing?
What was the bribe for?
Let's clear this up once and for all.
Be very specific so I can quote you directly from here on out.
Oh, who are you saying was bribed?
Who did the bribing?
What was the bribe for?
Let's clear this up once and for all.
Be very specific so I can quote you directly from here on out.
More complex question fallacy :lol
You needing me to "be specific" when you're generalizing for pages.. and failed to even accurately report what's in the post you're quoting = dishonest
You're dishonest
This we know
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 08:51 PM
More complex question fallacy :lol
You needing me to "be specific" when you're generalizing for pages.. and failed to even accurately report what's in the post you're quoting = dishonest
You're dishonest
This we knowSo no one was bribed?
How could there be bribery if no one was bribed?
I can only conclude you are saying there was no bribery after all.
Note: I never said you said who was bribed. You faked that.
You're dishonest
This we know
So no one was bribed?
How could there be bribery if no one was bribed?
I can only conclude you are saying there was no bribery after all.
Note: I never said you said who was bribed. You faked that.
You're dishonest
This we know
More fallacies
You're not interested in the facts. You never are.
boutons_deux
11-14-2018, 08:57 PM
Fox News legal analyst destroys DOJ’s justification for Whitaker appointment:
‘That kind of power can’t go to a political hack’
Fox News top legal analyst, Judge Andrew Napolitano, blew up the arguments made to defend Whitaker’s appointment.
Specifically, Whitaker’s team cited a case from just after the Civil War to make the case that the appointment was lawful.
“I don’t care what happened in 1866, because the Congress changed the law in the 1960s and said whoever runs the Justice Department has to be nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate,” he said.
“Because there’s too much power in their hands… That kind of power cannot go to a political hack.”
Napolitano said that the statute is very clear, and that the “Justice Department conveniently overlooks” the legality of Trump’s actions.
“Congress could not have been more clear,” Napolitano said.
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/11/fox-news-legal-analyst-destroys-dojs-justification-whitaker-appointment-kind-power-cant-go-political-hack/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29
spurraider21
11-14-2018, 08:59 PM
You using "Ib4..." then trying to create a conversation to bring your take to fruition = :lol
You know damn well I never said "bribed". Otherwise you would never have posted "inb4 "bribed" is not the same as "bribery"'.
Now you want me to use that exact same statement so you can :lol
Trying to set a trap for me. :cry so dishonest
so you're really going to die on the "bribed =/= bribery" hill? :lol ok
:cry i never said she was bribed, i just said that bribery happened :cry
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 09:01 PM
More fallacies
You're not interested in the facts. You never are.What are the facts concerning the bribery you claim, DerpMC?
Post them clearly so everyone can quote you directly.
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 09:01 PM
so you're really going to die on the "bribed =/= bribery" hill? :lol ok
:cry i never said she was bribed, i just said that bribery happened :cryHe's put up multiple straw men to protect him.
spurraider21
11-14-2018, 09:02 PM
^Still nothing in the way of proof that I said Hillary was bribed.
The committee approved. She sits on the committee. Ergo she approve. Her husband was given 500K by the Russians during this time.
There's never any way to prove bribery influenced anyone's decision, only that bribery happened. It happened.
Damn you Hillary supporters are salty as fuck...
:lol
:cry guys i never said hillary was bribed by russians. i just said bribery happened between hillary and russians
spurraider21
11-14-2018, 09:04 PM
:cry stop paraphrasing me, its such a common tactic with the left :cry
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 09:04 PM
:cry guys i never said hillary was bribed by russians. i just said bribery happened between hillary and russians
I SAID BRIBERY HAPPENED AND MENTIONED THREE PARTIES SO AS FAR AS YOU KNOW HILLARY BRIBED BILL INTO ACCEPTING BRIBE MONEY FROM THE RUSSIANS YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT FACTS AND JUST CALL PEOPLE NAMES PHILO SKEETER
so you're really going to die on the "bribed =/= bribery" hill? :lol ok
:cry i never said she was bribed, i just said that bribery happened :cry
There are two Clintons. An attorney should know this.
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 09:05 PM
ALSO ECHO CHAMBER
Pavlov
11-14-2018, 09:06 PM
There are two Clintons. An attorney should know this.No one said which Clinton you claimed was bribed.
Det's a straw man.
Now I will ask you: Which Clinton are you claiming was bribed by the Russians?
spurraider21
11-14-2018, 09:06 PM
There are two Clintons. An attorney should know this.
you said hillary (hillary is not bill) sold uranium to putin
:cry stop paraphrasing me, its such a common tactic with the left :cry
Misrepresenting my position is your calling card. Don't get offended because I pointed it out.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.