Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[spurraider21]

Why does fake news give TSA an L?
Neither the article nor the tweet make a factual claim that Cohen was in Prague. You just felt like calling something fake news because muh msm

[DarrinS]

Neither the article nor the tweet make a factual claim that Cohen was in Prague. You just felt like calling something fake news because muh msm

Tweet references this craptastic report

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/white-house/article208870264.html

[spurraider21]

Tweet references this craptastic report

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/white-house/article208870264.html
great. that report doesn't make the factual claim that cohen was in prague. they call it unconfirmed a couple of times, cite no official comment, and say "confirmation of the trip WOULD lend credence"... or "it WOULD also be one of the most significant developments"

you just felt like calling something fake news because muh msm

[TSA]

NEW: Sources tell us that Mueller has evidence Cohen was in Prague in 2016, confirming part of the dossier https://t.co/Gvu7mLrsFs
— McClatchyDC (@McClatchyDC) April 13, 2018




:lol Det dossier just gets more and more verified.


great. that report doesn't make the factual claim that cohen was in prague. they call it unconfirmed a couple of times, cite no official comment, and say "confirmation of the trip WOULD lend credence"... or "it WOULD also be one of the most significant developments"

you just felt like calling something fake news because muh msm


:rollin

[Pavlov]

Nervous laughter from TSA; still shook about Prague.

Why did Cohen drop the lawsuit, TSA?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Or, maybe it’s very easy to verify that he was in the US at the time of alleged Prague trip?

Then why isn't there a reported alibi, dim? We both know Fox News would spam it to the hilt if there was any such thing and you would be here crowing about it.

[spurraider21]

:rollin
well yeah. i mean if we find out what this mystery evidence is, that would probably go a long way in confirming it.

all we have right now is a report that mueller has certain evidence

[TSA]

Then why isn't there a reported alibi, dim? We both know Fox News would spam it to the hilt if there was any such thing and you would be here crowing about it.

There is a reported alibi dim, it was reported on almost a year ago.

[TSA]

well yeah. i mean if we find out what this mystery evidence is, that would probably go a long way in confirming it.

all we have right now is a report that mueller has certain evidence

And that unconfirmed report was enough for Pavlov to claim it's verified that Cohen went to Prague.

[Blake]

Nervous laughter from TSA; still shook about Prague.

Why did Cohen drop the lawsuit, TSA?

"The decision to voluntarily discontinue these cases was a difficult one," Cohen's attorney David Schwartz told*Politico. "We believe the defendants defamed my client, and vindicating Mr. Cohen’s rights was—and still remains—important. But given the events that have unfolded, and the time, attention*and resources needed to prosecute these matters, we have dismissed the matters, despite their merits."


http://www.newsweek.com/michael-cohen-drops-trump-dossier-lawsuit-because-he-has-too-many-other-legal-893111

Very lawyery response. "We just don't have the time" :depressed

[Pavlov]

And that unconfirmed report was enough for Pavlov to claim it's verified that Cohen went to Prague.

It's grocer-level verification. Usually more than good enough for you.

[TSA]

Nervous laughter from TSA; still shook about Prague.

Why did Cohen drop the lawsuit, TSA?

Nope that is just laughter directed at you and your claim.

I assume Cohen can't afford to fight two battles and chose to put his money towards the one directed at him.

[Pavlov]

Nope that is just laughter directed at you and your claim.

I assume Cohen can't afford to fight two battles and chose to put his money towards the one directed at him.
Your assumptions are often completely wrong though.

[TSA]

It's grocer-level verification. Usually more than good enough for you.

It's no-level verification, and it's good enough for you. :bobo

[spurraider21]

And that unconfirmed report was enough for Pavlov to claim it's verified that Cohen went to Prague.
should we go over the reports that were enough for you to claim it was verified that clinton was eating babies?

[Pavlov]

It's no-level verification, and it's good enough for you. :bobo

You were completely fine pushing the Clinton baby eating story. :bobo

[Pavlov]

should we go over the reports that were enough for you to claim it was verified that clinton was eating babies?
:bobo

[TSA]

should we go over the reports that were enough for you to claim it was verified that clinton was eating babies?

You will never find me claiming there were reports verifying Clinton was eating babies.

[TSA]

You were completely fine pushing the Clinton baby eating story. :bobo

Why do you lie so much?

[Pavlov]

Why do you lie so much?You pushed the Clinton baby-eating story.

Period.

Full stop.

Are you denying you pushed the Clinton baby eating story, TSA?

[TSA]

You pushed the Clinton baby-eating story.

Period.

Full stop.

Are you denying you pushed the Clinton baby eating story, TSA?

Yes. Feel free to find the thread you are talking about and bump it with a quote from me claiming there were reports verifying Clinton was eating babies. Don't derail this thread because you are embarrassed about your no-level verification.

[Pavlov]

Yes. Feel free to find the thread you are talking about and bump it with a quote from me claiming there were reports verifying Clinton was eating babies.https://media1.tenor.com/images/c924b622b71a51d0c4aa21760c69b9f3/tenor.gif?itemid=9264828Why are you so dishonest, TSA?

I said you pushed the story.

Which you did.

Don't try to squirm out of it by lying about what I just said. It's pathetic.

[djohn2oo8]

Another Trump attorney under investigation :lmao

[TSA]

Why are you so dishonest, TSA?

I said you pushed the story.

Which you did.

Don't try to squirm out of it by lying about what I just said. It's pathetic.

Don't derail this thread because you are embarrassed about your no-level verification. It's pathetic.

[Pavlov]

Don't derail this thread because you are embarrassed about your no-level verification. It's pathetic.Not embarrassed at all. You've gleefully used this level of verification in all your various conspiracy theories. Don't get pissy when someone else does it.

You pushed the Clinton baby eating story and you can't change that.

[djohn2oo8]

987005977479151617

[TSA]

Not embarrassed at all. You've gleefully used this level of verification in all your various conspiracy theories. Don't get pissy when someone else does it.

You pushed the Clinton baby eating story and you can't change that.
You are the only one claiming verification, and you are embarrassed as evidenced by your continuous attempts to derail the thread.

[TSA]

987005977479151617

Russian collusion!

[djohn2oo8]

Russian collusion!

Why is everyone around him under investigation?

[Pavlov]

You are the only one claiming verification, and you are embarrassed as evidenced by your continuous attempts to derail the thread.Nah, I stand by what I said. I'm fine with that level of verification as you have always been when it fit your agenda.

You've been trying to derail this thread from the beginning tbh. I know you don't like being reminded that you pushed the stupidest conspiracy theory ever posted on this board -- Hillary Clinton eats babies -- but you need to be reminded you did that often because it was so stupid and you were so stupid to push it.

You still refuse to own it. That gets a :lol from me every time.

[dabom]

987005977479151617

:lol

[spurraider21]

Nah, I stand by what I said. I'm fine with that level of verification as you have always been when it fit your agenda.

You've been trying to derail this thread from the beginning tbh. I know you don't like being reminded that you pushed the stupidest conspiracy theory ever posted on this board -- Hillary Clinton eats babies -- but you need to be reminded you did that often because it was so stupid and you were so stupid to push it.

You still refuse to own it. That gets a :lol from me every time.
my favorite is when he's pushed, he says "it was never just about clintons"... and then when teased about that, he goes back and reposts all his "evidence" against the clintons. its a seesaw

[boutons_deux]

Explosive: The Russian mafia ran U.S. operations out of a club partially owned by Trump's 'lawyer' (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/4/18/1758063/-Explosive-The-Russian-mafia-ran-U-S-operations-out-of-a-club-partially-owned-by-Trump-s-lawyer)

Now there are explosive new details about his so-called attorney, Michael Cohen, who just so happened to grow up in a rather exclusive NYC club that was known as the preferred meeting spot of the Russian mob in the U.S. You cannot make this stuff up. From Talking Points Memo: (https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/good-grief-cohens-gets-mobbier-the-closer-i-look)


According to published reports, in the 70s and early 80s, the boss of the Russian mob in New York (and for practical purposes the whole U.S) was a man named Evsei Agron. Things ended badly for Agron when was gunned down in a mob hit in 1985.

After Agron was assassinated, his organization was taken over by under-boss Marat Balagula.

Authorities believed Balagula was behind Agron’s killing. But he was never charged with the crime.

Balagula ran things until 1991 when he was convicted of gasoline bootlegging. Nayfeld had been the bodyguard and enforcer for both Agron and Balagula, one would say more successfully in the latter case than the former.

He took over the organization when Balagula went to prison.

What I didn’t realize until now is that both Agron (https://books.google.com/books?id=F1IqGCc7P8cC&pg=PT33&lpg=PT33&dq=Marat+Balagula+el+caribe&source=bl&ots=OI36fEqiAW&sig=kpev0Ln1l8LARf4kWM0YYpvIM5s&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiCiuC5msLaAhVhu1kKHRZeAngQ6AEIXzAL#v=on epage&q=Marat%20Balagula%20el%20caribe&f=false) and his successor Balagula (http://www.nydailynews.com/newswires/new-york/notorious-russian-mobster-home-article-1.3783151) ran their operations out of an office in the El Caribe social club.

So the El Caribe wasn’t just a mob hangout.

From the 70s through the 90s at least, the bosses of the Russian mafia in the U.S. literally ran their crime organization out of the El Caribe.

So Michael Cohen’s uncle Morton Levine’s social club was the headquarters of Russian organized crime in the U.S.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/04/18/1758063/-Explosive:-The-Russian-mafia-ran-US-operations-out-of-a-club-partially-owned-by-Trumps-lawyer?detail=emaildkre

[Pavlov]

my favorite is when he's pushed, he says "it was never just about clintons"... and then when teased about that, he goes back and reposts all his "evidence" against the clintons. its a seesawRight, every once in awhile he realizes how far over his skis he got and walks back to the "pedophiles exist" position, but then some anonymous post from ar15.com or 4chan angries up his blood again and Hillary's got her baby-eating bib back on.

[TSA]

Nah, I stand by what I said. I'm fine with that level of verification as you have always been when it fit your agenda.

You've been trying to derail this thread from the beginning tbh. I know you don't like being reminded that you pushed the stupidest conspiracy theory ever posted on this board -- Hillary Clinton eats babies -- but you need to be reminded you did that often because it was so stupid and you were so stupid to push it.

You still refuse to own it. That gets a :lol from me every time.

I refuse to own it because I never said Hillary Clinton eats babies.

And thank you for admitting you'll claim unverified reports as verified when they fit your agenda :bobo

[Pavlov]

I refuse to own it because I never said Hillary Clinton eats babies.
https://media1.tenor.com/images/c924b622b71a51d0c4aa21760c69b9f3/tenor.gif?itemid=9264828
:bobo

[TSA]

derail over


987006212628594688

[Pavlov]

derail over


987006212628594688
What does this have to do with Trump/Russia, TSA?

Looks like it's about Hillary Clinton.

Again.

lol "derail over"

[TSA]

What does this have to do with Trump/Russia, TSA?

Looks like it's about Hillary Clinton.

Again.

lol "derail over"

This thread hasn't been about Trump/Russia for months and yet now you decide to complain? :lol This thread has morphed into the sham investigation and what led up to it.

[spurraider21]

This thread hasn't been about Trump/Russia for months and yet now you decide to complain? :lol This thread has morphed into the sham investigation and what led up to it.
lol

[Pavlov]

This thread hasn't been about Trump/Russia for months and yet now you decide to complain? :lol This thread has morphed into the sham investigation and what led up to it.
You've been trying to derail this thread from the beginning tbh.
:lol sham investigation.

Is that your opinion of Mueller this week?

Until someone tells you to like him again?

[djohn2oo8]

:lol sham investigation.

Is that your opinion of Mueller this week?

Until someone tells you to like him again?

:lmao

[TSA]

:lol sham investigation.

Is that your opinion of Mueller this week?

Until someone tells you to like him again?

Yes sham investigation. To date: zero indictments concerning Trump/Russia election collusion.

[Pavlov]

Yes sham investigation. To date: zero indictments concerning Trump/Russia election collusion.So Mueller is running a complete sham investigation?

Or is it actually a soooper sekrit investigation to get Hillary Clinton and other Democrats?

Pick a lane, TSA.

[monosylab1k]

So Mueller is running a complete sham investigation?

Or is it actually a soooper sekrit investigation to get Hillary Clinton and other Democrats?

Pick a lane, TSA.

:lmao

When is that Susan Rice indictment coming, TSA?

[TSA]

So Mueller is running a complete sham investigation?

Or is it actually a soooper sekrit investigation to get Hillary Clinton and other Democrats?

Pick a lane, TSA.

Sham investigation.

How many indictments are there concerning Trump/Russia election collusion Pavlov?

[TSA]

:lmao

When is that Susan Rice indictment coming, TSA?

When are the Trump/Russia election collusion indictments coming mono?

[monosylab1k]

When are the Trump/Russia election collusion indictments coming mono?

Sooner than Susan Rice’s, that’s for sure :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

Sooner than Susan Rice’s, that’s for sure :lmao

:lmao

[TSA]

Justice IG sends criminal referral of Andrew McCabe to US attorney

https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/19/politics/justice-mccabe-criminal-referral/index.html

:lmao

[spurraider21]

Justice IG sends criminal referral of Andrew McCabe to US attorney

https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/19/politics/justice-mccabe-criminal-referral/index.html

:lmao
curious as to why that wasn't published in the report

[Pavlov]

Sham investigation.

How many indictments are there concerning Trump/Russia election collusion Pavlov?None, so far.

Would you expect Mueller to lead with such charges, TSA?

[Reck]

TSA comes out of his hole after hearing about muh 11 republicans want Hillary in jail and then proceeds to get shit on again.

Dissapearing act in 3..2.. :lol

[djohn2oo8]

987039425845694464

[Pavlov]

987039425845694464It's part of general response to Team Manafort's legal Hail Mary, but I guess the specific language could be seen as noteworthy.

[Pavlov]

TSA's grocers and poets will need to find new reasons to demand the firing of Rosenstein.

987049573578366976
987052379181846533

The shift gives some breathing room for Mueller, as well as Rosenstein, who has been criticized strongly by House Republicans for being slow to comply with requests for classified documents. Last week’s meeting was set up in part to allow Rosenstein to assuage Trump’s frustration with his decisions.

At the same time, Rosenstein’s message may have been based on a technicality. Trump may not officially be a target, but Mueller hasn’t ruled out making him one at some point in the future, according to a U.S. official with knowledge of the unfolding investigation.Crafty move either way.

[djohn2oo8]

TSA's grocers and poets will need to find new reasons to demand the firing of Rosenstein.

987049573578366976
987052379181846533
Crafty move either way.

Playing Trump like a fiddle

[TSA]

None, so far.

Would you expect Mueller to lead with such charges, TSA?

I would expect some of the current indictments to at least mention some form of collusion during the election if he is Mueller is trying to build that case.

[TSA]

TSA's grocers and poets will need to find new reasons to demand the firing of Rosenstein.


Sundance and Vachel living rent free in Pavlov's head :rollin

[Pavlov]

I would expect some of the current indictments to at least mention some form of collusion during the election if he is Mueller is trying to build that case.Why show his hand immediately?

As soon as that implicates people close to Dennison, Dennison would go nuclear. Better to get all your ducks in a row beforehand.

[Pavlov]

Sundance and Vachel living rent free in Pavlov's head :rollin:lol you're the one who cited them so slavishly for so long.

[Reck]

TSA's grocers and poets will need to find new reasons to demand the firing of Rosenstein.

987049573578366976
987052379181846533
Crafty move either way.

I dont know how this can actually be true if one is to believe Mueller is looking at obstruction of justice. Mueller is most definitely working on an obstruction case involving Trump or he wouldn't be asking about the Trump tower meeting or the statement they cooked up for Uday on Air Force One.

[spurraider21]

I dont know how this can actually be true if one is to believe Mueller is looking at obstruction of justice. Mueller is most definitely working on an obstruction case involving Trump or he wouldn't be asking about the Trump tower meeting or the statement they cooked up for Uday on Air Force One.
those aren't exclusive to obstruction... could also just show he had knowledge of attempts to coordinate with russians

[TSA]

:lol you're the one who cited them so slavishly for so long.

And you're the one bringing them up daily out of the blue. You read them more on twitter than I do.

Sundance and Vachel living rent free in your head :rollin

[Pavlov]

And you're the one bringing them up daily out of the blue. You read them more on twitter than I do.

Sundance and Vachel living rent free in your head :rollin:lol so defensive. They're your sources. Are you not proud of them?

[TSA]

:lol so defensive. They're your sources. Are you not proud of them?

so defensive? You aren't making any sense, you're shook. I'll check back in with you tomorrow for the latest grocer and poet news.

[Pavlov]

so defensive? You aren't making any sense, you're shook. I'll check back in with you tomorrow for the latest grocer and poet news.:lol so shook when I bring up your sources. Get back with me when you decide whether Mueller good or Mueller bad.

[TSA]

:lol so shook when I bring up your sources. Get back with me when you decide whether Mueller good or Mueller bad.

Yes...laughing at you for bringing them up more than I do means I'm shook :lol You are a strange fucker.

[TSA]

those aren't exclusive to obstruction... could also just show he had knowledge of attempts to coordinate with russians

Or it has nothing to with Trump at all

987060068096135174

[DarrinS]

Or, maybe it’s very easy to verify that he was in the US at the time of alleged Prague trip?


Then why isn't there a reported alibi, dim? We both know Fox News would spam it to the hilt if there was any such thing and you would be here crowing about it.



There is a reported alibi dim, it was reported on almost a year ago.


Maybe Cohen has a doppelgänger that fooled his own son and USC’s baseball coach. :lol

[Pavlov]

Yes...laughing at you for bringing them up more than I do means I'm shook :lol You are a strange fucker.I bring them up because your repeated use of them as sources is hilarious.

Your trying to turn that back on me is even more hilarious.

They're your sources. :lol

[Chris]

Why is everyone around him under investigation?

It's called a witch hunt.


See:McCarthyism

(a campaign or practice that endorses the use of unfair allegations and investigations)

:tu

[Pavlov]

It's called a witch hunt.


See:McCarthyism

(a campaign or practice that endorses the use of unfair allegations and investigations)

:tuHow is it unfair?

[DarrinS]

You fucking stupid worthless piece of shit. If you’re working from the position of having the truth on your side, you want the investigation to continue. Christ you push for it.

You really should just make a pact with scared little crissy and kill your worthless fucking selves

Wow. What’s wrong with this kid? :lol

[spurraider21]

Maybe Cohen has a doppelgänger that fooled his own son and USC’s baseball coach. :lol
how long was he at USC?

[Chris]

Or it has nothing to with Trump at all

987060068096135174

Not a target remains.

[Chris]

Wow. What’s wrong with this kid? :lol

One of mono's vitriol trolls probably.

[DarrinS]

how long was he at USC?

Don’t know. There’s also the geotagged tweets that show Cohen in CA and NY.

[Reck]

Or it has nothing to with Trump at all

987060068096135174


Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein told President Donald Trump (https://www.bloomberg.com/billionaires/id/1252249) last week that he isn’t a target of any part of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, according to two people familiar with the matter.

Nowhere does it say anything regarding the Cohen investigation which Mueller isn't even a part of.

And what's more:


Rosenstein’s message may have been based on a technicality. Trump may not officially be a target, but Mueller hasn’t ruled out making him one at some point in the future, according to a U.S. official with knowledge of the unfolding investigation.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-19/manafort-probed-as-back-channel-to-russia-u-s-lawyer-says

:lol TSA

[spurraider21]

Don’t know. There’s also the geotagged tweets that show Cohen in CA and NY.
no doubt. but we dont have an allegation as to a specific date he was allegedly in prague, as far as i'm aware. so its hard to claim an alibi for a weekend visit at usc or something to say oh he was never in prague during some indefinite time period

[Chris]

no doubt. but we dont have an allegation as to a specific date he was allegedly in prague, as far as i'm aware. so its hard to claim an alibi for a weekend visit at usc or something to say oh he was never in prague during some indefinite time period

Why is it hard to claim an alibi for a weekend visit?

[spurraider21]

Why is it hard to claim an alibi for a weekend visit?
it's not hard for that weekend.

its hard for the alibi to be entirely meaningful if it doesnt cover the date he was allegedly in prague

imagine putting up all the evidence in the world that you were at USC during a weekend when the allegation is you were in prague the following weekend :lol

[Brazil]

Or it has nothing to with Trump at all

987060068096135174

If this is the case why Trump was tweeting like a madman about this investigation ?
If this has nothing to do with him, why not just stfu and wait for the result of the so called investigation ?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Don’t know. There’s also the geotagged tweets that show Cohen in CA and NY.

There are these things called airplanes and please show the part of the dossier that aligns the dates with said USC, etc date. It's real simple: if his passport puts him in the EU during that 2016 timeframe he has no alibi.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Investigators for Special Counsel Robert Mueller have evidence Cohen entered the Czech Republic through Germany in late summer 2016, McClatchy reported, citing two unnamed sources. The news agency said it was unclear whether Mueller's investigators have evidence that Cohen met with a prominent Russian as the dossier claimed.

https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2018/04/13/world/europe/13reuters-usa-trump-russia-prague.html

I await the deep state conspiratard deep state deflection.

[Pavlov]

https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2018/04/13/world/europe/13reuters-usa-trump-russia-prague.html

I await the deep state conspiratard deep state deflection.McClatchy bad though. Only anonymous alt-right commentators are credible.

[DarrinS]

https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2018/04/13/world/europe/13reuters-usa-trump-russia-prague.html

I await the deep state conspiratard deep state deflection.


http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/16/michael-cohen-prague-meeting/

[Chris]

Alibis are rock solid. More fake news.

[Pavlov]

Alibis are rock solid. More fake news.What are the alibis?

[spurraider21]

http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/16/michael-cohen-prague-meeting/
The story does not, actually, say that Michael Cohen was, in fact, in Prague at the relevant time. It says that Mueller’s investigation has developed some evidence that he was in Prague.

:lol thats what i told you

[DarrinS]

The story does not, actually, say that Michael Cohen was, in fact, in Prague at the relevant time. It says that Mueller’s investigation has developed some evidence that he was in Prague.

:lol thats what i told you

And I’m skeptical that they have evidence of that. I believe they have evidence that Cohen is involved in some criminal activity, which is why they handed it off to SDNY.

[spurraider21]

And I’m skeptical that they have evidence of that. I believe they have evidence that Cohen is involved in some criminal activity, which is why they handed it off to SDNY.
does your skepticism make it fake news?

[Chris]

What are the alibis?

The people at the University who spoke with Cohen and he was with his son as well. Time stamped photos on Facebook confirms this.

Mueller is embarrassed they misidentified a different Michael Cohen in Prague.

[Chris]

He has an iron clad airtight alibi he was in Los Angeles.

[spurraider21]

The people at the University who spoke with Cohen and he was with his son as well. Time stamped photos on Facebook confirms this.

Mueller is embarrassed they misidentified a different Michael Cohen in Prague.


He has an iron clad airtight alibi he was in Los Angeles.
on what days was he in los angeles?

[Chris]

987127634852286464

unredacted tomorrow
TSA

[Pavlov]

The people at the University who spoke with Cohen and he was with his son as well. Time stamped photos on Facebook confirms this.

Mueller is embarrassed they misidentified a different Michael Cohen in Prague.


He has an iron clad airtight alibi he was in Los Angeles.For two months?

[DarrinS]

on what days was he in los angeles?

Man, you really believe. :lol

[DarrinS]

For two months?

August is only one month.

[Pavlov]

987127634852286464

unredacted tomorrow
TSAWho's going to unredact them?

[spurraider21]

Man, you really believe. :lol
believe what? i was fairly skeptical when this report came out (pointed out to chump that a government official had previously said it was a different michael cohen, pointed out the alibi, etc)... i'm still not convinced. but its pretty silly to rule out a 1-2 month window because he has an alibi for 1 weekend :lol

[Chris]

on what days was he in los angeles?

A better question would be why do we have such a broad timeline on an alleged meeting with Kochasev? We know all the specifics except exactly when it happened? "Sometime in August or early September according to anonymous sources"? Sounds like bullshit just like the Steele Dossier. Just prove Cohen went to Prague one time since he has denied ever going. Simple.

[Chris]

Who's going to unredact them?

Joe Piscopo

[spurraider21]

A better question would be why do we have such a broad timeline on an alleged meeting with Kochasev? We know all the specifics except exactly when it happened? "Sometime in August or early September according to anonymous sources"? Sounds like bullshit just like the Steele Dossier. Just prove Cohen went to Prague one time since he has denied ever going. Simple.
i'm sure the government would have to pinpoint an exact date if they were to prove it, so i wouldn't worry about that :lol... he's not going to get convicted for being there "at some point in time"

that being said, do you understand why a one weekend alibi isn't on its own convincing when the scope of time extends to over a month?

[Pavlov]

A better question would be why do we have such a broad timeline on an alleged meeting with Kochasev? We know all the specifics except exactly when it happened? "Sometime in August or early September according to anonymous sources"? Sounds like bullshit just like the Steele Dossier. Just prove Cohen went to Prague one time since he has denied ever going. Simple.:lol "just like the Steele dossier"

I'm sure Mueller is on the case, Chris. Don't worry.

[Chris]

i'm sure the government would have to pinpoint an exact date if they were to prove it, so i wouldn't worry about that :lol... he's not going to get convicted for being there "at some point in time"

that being said, do you understand why a one weekend alibi isn't on its own convincing when the scope of time extends to over a month?

Yes I understand that.

[spurraider21]

Yes I understand that.
:tu that's all i've been saying. i dont doubt that the alibi is accurate.

[djohn2oo8]

987132082924216320

[DarrinS]

987132082924216320

Brian Ross will probably retweet this. :lol

[Reck]

Leaked memos, leaked memos everywhere.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4442900-Ex-FBI-Director-James-Comey-s-memos.html

:lmao

[Chris]

Comey memo says "Trump asked him to investigate his campaign for possible collusion". Does this count as exculpatory evidence?

[DarrinS]

Comey memo says "Trump asked him to investigate his campaign for possible collusion". Does this count as exculpatory evidence?

Obstruction!

[TSA]

Giuliani has joined Trump’s legal team. This thing is wrapping up.

[Reck]

Giuliani has joined Trump’s legal team. This thing is wrapping up.

:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

Giuliani has joined Trump’s legal team. This thing is wrapping up.

987147681700171776

[djohn2oo8]

987143821065703424

[Reck]

987147681700171776

The guy who was investigated for having advanced knowledge of the Hillary case is going to tell Mueller to SCRAM!

:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

987141305930313733

[djohn2oo8]

987151635653808129

[Spurminator]

987151635653808129

I haven't seen anything about them yet but the fact that our biggest resident leaks-enthusiast hasn't started a thread about them is a good sign that's the case

[djohn2oo8]

987152758569652225

[djohn2oo8]

987155886991925252

[hitmanyr2k]

From what I read of the memos Trump was a bit obsessed with the "golden showers" thing :lol For a story that's supposed to be fake he sure brought it up a lot.

[DarrinS]

Wow. These revelations about as exciting as Comey interview and book. :rolleyes

[djohn2oo8]

987149488610594819

[Chris]

987151635653808129

It's just him. The memos damage Comey and defend Trump.

This is devastating for TeamStillWithHer :lol

[Reck]

It's just him. The memos damage Comey and defend Trump.

This is devastating for TeamStillWithHer :lol

What?

In what way do these memos help Trump...like in the least? :lol Chris

[Chris]

987152779830493184

https://i.imgur.com/G0Py7qL.gif

[TSA]

What?

In what way do these memos help Trump...like in the least? :lol Chris

Washington, D.C. – Today House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Ca.), House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) issued the following statement:

“We have long argued former Director Comey’s self-styled memos should be in the public domain, subject to any classification redactions. These memos are significant for both what is in them and what is not.

Former Director Comey’s memos show the President made clear he wanted allegations of collusion, coordination, and conspiracy between his campaign and Russia fully investigated. The memos also made clear the ‘cloud’ President Trump wanted lifted was not the Russian interference in the 2016 election cloud, rather it was the salacious, unsubstantiated allegations related to personal conduct leveled in the dossier.

The memos also show former Director Comey never wrote that he felt obstructed or threatened. While former Director Comey went to great lengths to set dining room scenes, discuss height requirements, describe the multiple times he felt complimented, and myriad other extraneous facts, he never once mentioned the most relevant fact of all, which was whether he felt obstructed in his investigation.

The memos also make certain what has become increasingly clear of late: former Director Comey has at least two different standards in his interactions with others. He chose not to memorialize conversations with President Obama, Attorney General Lynch, Secretary Clinton, Andrew McCabe or others, but he immediately began to memorialize conversations with President Trump. It is significant former Director Comey made no effort to memorialize conversations with former Attorney General Lynch despite concerns apparently significant enough to warrant his unprecedented appropriation of the charging decision away from her and the Department of Justice in July of 2016.

These memos also lay bare the notion that former Director Comey is not motivated by animus. He was willing to work for someone he deemed morally unsuited for office, capable of lying, requiring of personal loyalty, worthy of impeachment, and sharing the traits of a mob boss. Former Director Comey was willing to overlook all of the aforementioned characteristics in order to keep his job. In his eyes, the real crime was his own firing.

The memos show Comey was blind to biases within the FBI and had terrible judgment with respect to his deputy Andrew McCabe. On multiple occasions he, in his own words, defended the character of McCabe after President Trump questioned McCabe.

Finally, former Director Comey leaked at least one of these memos for the stated purpose of spurring the appointment of Special Counsel, yet he took no steps to spur the appointment of Special Counsel when he had significant concerns about the objectivity of the Department of Justice under Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

As we have consistently said, rather than making a criminal case for obstruction or interference with an ongoing investigation, these memos would be Defense Exhibit A should such a charge be made.”
:lol Reck

https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=879

[Spurminator]

:lmao GOP response

[Chris]

Washington, D.C. – Today House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Ca.), House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) issued the following statement:

“We have long argued former Director Comey’s self-styled memos should be in the public domain, subject to any classification redactions. These memos are significant for both what is in them and what is not.

Former Director Comey’s memos show the President made clear he wanted allegations of collusion, coordination, and conspiracy between his campaign and Russia fully investigated. The memos also made clear the ‘cloud’ President Trump wanted lifted was not the Russian interference in the 2016 election cloud, rather it was the salacious, unsubstantiated allegations related to personal conduct leveled in the dossier.

The memos also show former Director Comey never wrote that he felt obstructed or threatened. While former Director Comey went to great lengths to set dining room scenes, discuss height requirements, describe the multiple times he felt complimented, and myriad other extraneous facts, he never once mentioned the most relevant fact of all, which was whether he felt obstructed in his investigation.

The memos also make certain what has become increasingly clear of late: former Director Comey has at least two different standards in his interactions with others. He chose not to memorialize conversations with President Obama, Attorney General Lynch, Secretary Clinton, Andrew McCabe or others, but he immediately began to memorialize conversations with President Trump. It is significant former Director Comey made no effort to memorialize conversations with former Attorney General Lynch despite concerns apparently significant enough to warrant his unprecedented appropriation of the charging decision away from her and the Department of Justice in July of 2016.

These memos also lay bare the notion that former Director Comey is not motivated by animus. He was willing to work for someone he deemed morally unsuited for office, capable of lying, requiring of personal loyalty, worthy of impeachment, and sharing the traits of a mob boss. Former Director Comey was willing to overlook all of the aforementioned characteristics in order to keep his job. In his eyes, the real crime was his own firing.

The memos show Comey was blind to biases within the FBI and had terrible judgment with respect to his deputy Andrew McCabe. On multiple occasions he, in his own words, defended the character of McCabe after President Trump questioned McCabe.

Finally, former Director Comey leaked at least one of these memos for the stated purpose of spurring the appointment of Special Counsel, yet he took no steps to spur the appointment of Special Counsel when he had significant concerns about the objectivity of the Department of Justice under Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

As we have consistently said, rather than making a criminal case for obstruction or interference with an ongoing investigation, these memos would be Defense Exhibit A should such a charge be made.”
:lol Reck

https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=879

Poor fella :lol

[Chris]

Giuliani has joined Trump’s legal team. This thing is wrapping up.

987161926303023105

https://i.giphy.com/media/S3Ot3hZ5bcy8o/giphy.gif

[Reck]

Washington, D.C. – Today House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Ca.), House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) issued the following statement:

“We have long argued former Director Comey’s self-styled memos should be in the public domain, subject to any classification redactions. These memos are significant for both what is in them and what is not.

Former Director Comey’s memos show the President made clear he wanted allegations of collusion, coordination, and conspiracy between his campaign and Russia fully investigated. The memos also made clear the ‘cloud’ President Trump wanted lifted was not the Russian interference in the 2016 election cloud, rather it was the salacious, unsubstantiated allegations related to personal conduct leveled in the dossier.

The memos also show former Director Comey never wrote that he felt obstructed or threatened. While former Director Comey went to great lengths to set dining room scenes, discuss height requirements, describe the multiple times he felt complimented, and myriad other extraneous facts, he never once mentioned the most relevant fact of all, which was whether he felt obstructed in his investigation.

The memos also make certain what has become increasingly clear of late: former Director Comey has at least two different standards in his interactions with others. He chose not to memorialize conversations with President Obama, Attorney General Lynch, Secretary Clinton, Andrew McCabe or others, but he immediately began to memorialize conversations with President Trump. It is significant former Director Comey made no effort to memorialize conversations with former Attorney General Lynch despite concerns apparently significant enough to warrant his unprecedented appropriation of the charging decision away from her and the Department of Justice in July of 2016.

These memos also lay bare the notion that former Director Comey is not motivated by animus. He was willing to work for someone he deemed morally unsuited for office, capable of lying, requiring of personal loyalty, worthy of impeachment, and sharing the traits of a mob boss. Former Director Comey was willing to overlook all of the aforementioned characteristics in order to keep his job. In his eyes, the real crime was his own firing.

The memos show Comey was blind to biases within the FBI and had terrible judgment with respect to his deputy Andrew McCabe. On multiple occasions he, in his own words, defended the character of McCabe after President Trump questioned McCabe.

Finally, former Director Comey leaked at least one of these memos for the stated purpose of spurring the appointment of Special Counsel, yet he took no steps to spur the appointment of Special Counsel when he had significant concerns about the objectivity of the Department of Justice under Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

As we have consistently said, rather than making a criminal case for obstruction or interference with an ongoing investigation, these memos would be Defense Exhibit A should such a charge be made.”
:lol Reck

https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=879

Stopped reading at Devin Nunes. :lmao

I dont know why you're laughing though.

[Reck]

987161926303023105

https://i.giphy.com/media/S3Ot3hZ5bcy8o/giphy.gif

And when that doesn't happen? Give it two more weeks...

:lmao

[TSA]

987143821065703424

What do redactions represent djohn?

[DarrinS]

986998004015075328

Maybe he paid for peepee tape

[DarrinS]

863575726880157696

:lol

[DarrinS]

986739133593849856


Get him!

[Chris]

:lol

[Pavlov]

Wow. These revelations about as exciting as Comey interview and book. :rolleyes
Did you read the book, Darrin?

[djohn2oo8]

987164352242266112
Lordy!

[DarrinS]

987164352242266112
Lordy!

Wrong again. :lol

[Chris]

987174256097316864

[Reck]

Wrong again. :lol

No, he's accurate.

Trump can fire Rosenstein and the next guy could also refuse then get fired. Then the next guy that comes in can also refuse and so on.

If none of the people who take up the acting gig dont do what Trump wants there's nothing he can do.

:lol Firing the whole DOJ and still technically not being able to fired Mueller. :lol

[DarrinS]

Did you read the book, Darrin?

No. And evidently not many people will. :lol

[Reck]

987174256097316864

Citizen X.

Still going to bat for a guilty man who has no outs. :lmao

[DarrinS]

No, he's accurate.

Trump can fire Rosenstein and the next guy could also refuse then get fired. Then the next guy that comes in can also refuse and so on.

If none of the people who take up the acting gig dont do what Trump wants there's nothing he can do.

:lol Firing the whole DOJ and still technically not being able to fired Mueller. :lol



I was commenting on whether someone could end the investigation. Good try tho.

[Reck]

No. And evidently not many people will. :lol

https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_c_1_10/143-2068518-7557015?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=books+best+sellers&sprefix=best+selle%2Caps%2C400&crid=1EIH1DFGR0I3F

On the best seller list and 4 and a half stars :lol

You're going full retard tonight. You're usually not this stupid. Full moon?

[DarrinS]

https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_c_1_10/143-2068518-7557015?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=books+best+sellers&sprefix=best+selle%2Caps%2C400&crid=1EIH1DFGR0I3F

On the best seller list and 4 and a half stars :lol

You're going full retard tonight. You're usually not this stupid. Full moon?


I clicked your link. How many pages deep do I need to go? :lol

[DarrinS]

https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/17/politics/james-comey-book-release-dc/index.html

:lmao

[boutons_deux]

Here are the 8 most shocking revelations from the release of the Comey memos

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/04/8-shocking-revelations-release-comey-memos/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

[Pavlov]

You can tell when Darrin is anxious for his Dear Leader.

[djohn2oo8]

I was commenting on whether someone could end the investigation. Good try tho.

Trump can't :rollin

[djohn2oo8]

You can tell when Darrin is anxious for his Dear Leader.

Yeah quoting sources he usually laughs at. He shook.

[djohn2oo8]

987164560938455041
:lmao Christ!

[djohn2oo8]

987124828594417665
:rollin

[Chucho]

Trump can't :rollin

That's funny since the investigation can't get Trump.

[djohn2oo8]

987162211494907904
987162685581217794

[djohn2oo8]

That's funny since the investigation can't get Trump.

lol says who?

[Chucho]

lol says who?

LOL, says reality at the moment.

You keep waiting tho. I know how much you need that.

[djohn2oo8]

LOL, says reality at the moment.

You keep waiting tho. I know how much you need that.

So you provided nothing at all to back up your claim.

[Chris]

987153253073870848

[djohn2oo8]

lol

[djohn2oo8]

https://www.democracynow.org/images/headlines/91/38291/quarter_hd/H13_Sater.jpg
Classic

[DMX7]

987124828594417665
:rollin

BRUTAL. :lol

[TSA]

987152758569652225

Why do you keep posting memos that have sentences blacked out?

[djohn2oo8]

Why do you keep posting memos that have sentences blacked out?

Why do you think they are blacked out?

[DarrinS]

http://thefederalist.com/2018/04/20/comeys-memos-indicate-dossier-briefing-of-trump-was-a-setup/

[Pavlov]

http://thefederalist.com/2018/04/20/comeys-memos-indicate-dossier-briefing-of-trump-was-a-setup/

Is this what you believe, Darrin?

Does this count as your take?

[Brazil]

The release of this memo is kinda dumb, people were already forgetting about Comey and his book, this release just makes more publicity for what comey has to say

[Pavlov]

Yeah, the Republicans overplayed their hand threatening officials over the release of evidence in an active investigation.

[spurraider21]

Man. Imagine if darrin actually liked trump

[Blake]

987174256097316864

@ "ChrisfromST"

Citizen X

Chris delivering the daily lolz :lol

[djohn2oo8]

@ "ChrisfromST"

Citizen X

Chris delivering the daily lolz :lol

:lmao

[spurraider21]

987174256097316864
This is just proof that the judge is colluding with manafort

[Blake]

986590902817837056

Sorry about your buddy, Chris

:depressed muh confederate flag

[Chris]

Yeah, the Republicans overplayed their hand threatening officials over the release of evidence in an active investigation.

Yep, combine those with the Trump tweets and the jury will have no choice.

[Pavlov]

Yep, combine those with the Trump tweets and the jury will have no choice.:lol still butthurt over a legal concept you don't understand.

[RandomGuy]

Why do you keep posting memos that have sentences blacked out?

https://img.wonkette.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/comeymemo2.png

[RandomGuy]

http://thefederalist.com/2018/04/20/comeys-memos-indicate-dossier-briefing-of-trump-was-a-setup/

https://img.wonkette.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/comeymemo2.png

[RandomGuy]

Why do you keep posting memos that have sentences blacked out?

Attachment A doesn't mention Hillary. :rollin

[Reck]

I clicked your link. How many pages deep do I need to go? :lol

Dont know, haven't read it--unlikely to read it.

But that doesn't mean others wont or that the book won't sell.

[RandomGuy]

http://thefederalist.com/2018/04/20/comeys-memos-indicate-dossier-briefing-of-trump-was-a-setup/

Did you ever watch Trump talk about that pee pee tape? Look it up on youtube.

Dude totally did it. hole-y shit that answer made him sound guilty as shit.

[TSA]

Did you ever watch Trump talk about that pee pee tape? Look it up on youtube.

Dude totally did it. hole-y shit that answer made him sound guilty as shit.

wDYNVH0U3cs

[RandomGuy]

[youtube video about something that Randomguy can neither see the title of, nor ever bother watching]

Attachment A.

[DarrinS]

Did you ever watch Trump talk about that pee pee tape? Look it up on youtube.

Dude totally did it. hole-y shit that answer made him sound guilty as shit.


Yeah, a guilty person would surely ask the FBI director to investigate that. :rolleyes

[Monostradamus]

Man. Imagine if darrin actually liked trump

[RandomGuy]

Yeah, a guilty person would surely ask the FBI director to investigate that. :rolleyes

Did you see Trump's answer to it when he was asked about it Darrin?

[boutons_deux]

Manafort was under investigation because Mueller suspected he was Trump's back channel to Russia (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/4/19/1758452/-Manafort-was-under-investigation-because-Mueller-suspected-he-was-Trump-s-back-channel-to-Russia)

Paul Manafort’s attorneys have been arguing in court that in prosecuting Manafort, Special Counsel Robert Mueller has exceeded his authority (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/3/21/1750880/-Paul-Manafort-swings-for-the-fences-tries-to-end-Manafort-s-investigation-in-court).

The idea that Mueller was in the weeds is completely belied by the letter that Mueller’s team produced (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/4/3/1754052/-Memo-reveals-that-investigation-into-Manfort-is-a-fraction-of-Mueller-s-additional-authority),

showing the Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had specifically authorized Mueller to investigate the areas for which Manfort is being prosecuted.

But as Manafort’s legal team has continued in their attempts to find some way to invalidate the charges—

other than demonstrating Manafort’s innocence, which seems patently impossible—

it has spurred additional information from the DOJ on just why Mueller was looking at Manafort. (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-19/manafort-probed-as-back-channel-to-russia-u-s-lawyer-says)

Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s interest in former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort stemmed in part from his suspected role as a “back channel” between the campaign and Russians intent on meddling in the election, a Justice Department lawyer told a judge.


Previously, all the dots were in place.

Manafort had connections to Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska.

He had contact with Deripaska during the campaign,

as well as contact with convicted attorney Alex van Der Zwaan,

who is not only the son-in-law of a prominent Russian banker,

but also a link to “Person A,” who has been identified as GRU agent Konstantin Kilimnik.

Which means that Manafort’s charges are not just related to Mueller’s investigation.

They’re the primary reason there was an investigation in the first place.

What Paul Manafort did, is exactly what the FBI set out to find when they started looking at the Trump campaign.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/4/19/1758452/-Manafort-was-under-investigation-because-Mueller-suspected-he-was-Trump-s-back-channel-to-Russia?detail=emaildkre

[Chris]

Desperate times call for desperate measures.


987382370595688449

[Chris]

"DNC chairman Tom Perez commented on the impending legal battle Friday, saying the move was “not partisan, it’s patriotic."

zUyqDxa2k3w

[Pavlov]

:lol civil lawsuits are now all caps NUCLEAR

[Chris]

How do you sue Russia? :lol

[Blake]

How do you sue Russia? :lol

They're suing the Russian government. It probably won't fly but that's how you sue Russia.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

August is only one month.

And the USC trip was a weekend. This should not be hard. OH btw, if you are going to post links at me and not quote the salient portion of the article, I am not going to bother reading them myself. You likely have not read the link beyond the headline and I would rather not waste my time.

[Reck]

These are tactics to drown Trump and the GOP into more Russia shit. It won't go anywhere of course but as long as the Russian narrative stays in the public sphere, it's a problem heading into the midterms.

Democrats taking a play from the republican playbook for once. :lol

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Yeah, a guilty person would surely ask the FBI director to investigate that. :rolleyes

The context of that ask is Trump asking for loyalty and worries that his wife might believe it. the story is not exculpatory no matter how hard you wish for it, dim.

[TSA]

These are tactics to drown Trump and the GOP into more Russia shit. It won't go anywhere of course but as long as the Russian narrative stays in the public sphere, it's a problem heading into the midterms.

Democrats taking a play from the republican playbook for once. :lol

Seems like a really dumb idea by the Democrats. They’re opening up Crowdstrike and Perkins Coie to deposition.

[TSA]

Why do you think they are blacked out?

987383284547104768
Oops

[RandomGuy]

Seems like a really dumb idea by the Democrats. They’re opening up Crowdstrike and Perkins Coie to deposition.

TRUMP FUNDRAISER OFFERED RUSSIAN GAS COMPANY PLAN TO GET SANCTIONS LIFTED FOR $26 MILLION

https://theintercept.com/2018/04/20/elliott-broidy-trump-russia-sanctions

[RandomGuy]

Seems like a really dumb idea by the Democrats. They’re opening up Crowdstrike and Perkins Coie to deposition.

I guess from your dumbass mother fucker perspective, sure. You have deluded yourself that reality is X when it is actually something entirely else.

Your fucktarded conspiracy theory will fail when it gets to where evidence matters, i.e. an actual court. You will fail as hard as that stupid mother fucker from Kansas trying to prove all that voter fraud, and getting found in contempt of court in the process.

I have little doubt you will continue to put your mental energy into stupid fucking theories. Someday you may wake up from your delusions. When that day comes, welcome to reality, dude, sorry it took you so long.

[Spurminator]

Yeah, a guilty person would surely ask the FBI director to investigate that. :rolleyes

What would a guilty person say instead? "Please don't investigate that?"

:lol

[RandomGuy]

What would a guilty person say instead? "Please don't investigate that?"

:lol

Think carefully about what the FBI director was asked to do.

"Prove it didn't happen".

He wasn't asked to investigate the charge. He was asked to "disprove it".

That about that for a minute. The president... asked the FBI director... to make shit up FOR him... ??? What exactly was being asked there?

[Thebesteva]

he has Michael Jordan. (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=33236)

he had one of the better troll-stretches i can remember on ST the summer dwert was leaving LA. i think Thebesteva (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=42939) still thinks it was harlem :lol

That troll was the shit tbh

[TSA]

I guess from your dumbass mother fucker perspective, sure. You have deluded yourself that reality is X when it is actually something entirely else.

Your fucktarded conspiracy theory will fail when it gets to where evidence matters, i.e. an actual court. You will fail as hard as that stupid mother fucker from Kansas trying to prove all that voter fraud, and getting found in contempt of court in the process.

I have little doubt you will continue to put your mental energy into stupid fucking theories. Someday you may wake up from your delusions. When that day comes, welcome to reality, dude, sorry it took you so long.

The only fucktarded conspiracy theory that is failing is the Trump/Russia election collusion conspiracy theory. You have deluded yourself that reality is X when it is actually something entirely else.

[TSA]

BTW Comey had a FISA warrant on Trump. Now the only question is does Pence take over.

:lmao

[boutons_deux]

The only fucktarded conspiracy theory that is failing is the Trump/Russia election collusion conspiracy theory.

so you believe Trash? :lol

Mueller's batallion hasn't completed its very complicated work, esp with so much new info pouring in (eg, from Cohen and probably Manafort, etc)

[Reck]

987383284547104768
Oops

As FBI director, Comey could declassify material, no?

As a side, I dont think you can blame or charge Comey with something that wasn't classified at the time he shared his memo with his friend. You cant retroactively classify the memos and then point the fingers at Comey for releasing classfied material when he didn't.


One of the memos contained information that wasn’t classified when Comey turned it over to a Columbia law school professor, but was later upgraded to “confidential,” the lowest level of classification, The Wall Street Journal reported (https://www.wsj.com/articles/justice-department-watchdog-probes-comey-memos-over-classified-information-1524243505).


In the other, Comey redacted parts that he knew were classified to protect that information before he handed the documents over to the law prof, Daniel Richman, who passed them along to The New York Times.

Looks like Comey knew how to cover his bases.

[TSA]

As FBI director, Comey could declassify material, no?

As a side, I dont think you can blame or charge Comey with something that wasn't classified at the time he shared his memo with his friend. You cant retroactively classify the memos and then point the fingers at Comey for releasing classfied material when he didn't.





Looks like Comey knew how to cover his bases.

As a side note, it really doesn't matter what you think and it's up to the Obama appointee to decide whether or not Comey leaked classified material.

https://media.giphy.com/media/tzfcIaLuuY8k8/giphy.gif

[Reck]

As a side note, it really doesn't matter what you think and it's up to the Obama appointee to decide whether or not Comey leaked classified material.

https://media.giphy.com/media/tzfcIaLuuY8k8/giphy.gif

As a side note, you're a nutcase conspiratard everyone mocks daily and what you think really doesn't matter.

:lol Thinking people could get charged on made up crimes. :lol TSA the ever stupid cuck.

[Pavlov]

Seems like a really dumb idea by the Democrats. They’re opening up Crowdstrike and Perkins Coie to deposition.What are you accusing them of, TSA?

[TSA]

As a side note, you're a nutcase conspiratard everyone mocks daily and what you think really doesn't matter.

:lol Thinking people could get charged on made up crimes. :lol TSA the ever stupid cuck.


Obama appointee making up crimes Obama appointee bad now.

[Chris]

987413834787905536

[TSA]

What are you accusing them of, TSA?

I didn't accuse them of anything. Do you think the defendants will not have the deposed? They are central to the DNC hack claims.

[RandomGuy]

987383284547104768
Oops

Why the GOP’s failure over the Comey memos seems so familiar
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/why-the-gops-failure-over-the-comey-memos-seems-so-familiar

[TSA]

Why the GOP’s failure over the Comey memos seems so familiar
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/why-the-gops-failure-over-the-comey-memos-seems-so-familiar

:lol Maddow

Hurry...find a Wonkette article

[Pavlov]

987413834787905536:lol "developing" a new conspiracy theory because the old ones are failing.

[Pavlov]

I didn't accuse them of anything. Do you think the defendants will not have the deposed? They are central to the DNC hack claims.So you're not accusing them of anything.

OK.

[Reck]

Obama appointee making up crimes Obama appointee bad now.

Obama Apointee hasn't said Comey leaked clasified informartion.

It's just a review. :lol 4channityannex being his usual dumb fuck self.

[TSA]

So you're not accusing them of anything.

OK.

Do you think the defendants will not have the deposed? They are central to the DNC hack claims.

[TSA]

Obama Apointee hasn't said Comey leaked clasified informartion.

It's just a review. :lol 4channityannex being his usual dumb fuck self.

And you laughed at the Obama appointee review of McCabe...how'd that work out for you?

[Pavlov]

Do you think the defendants will not have the deposed? They are central to the DNC hack claims.What are you saying will happen, TSA?

Spit it out.

[Reck]

And you laughed at the Obama appointee review of McCabe...how'd that work out for you?

How did that worked out for me? Splendid seem as how that didn't affect me in the least. :lol

[TSA]

What are you saying will happen, TSA?

Spit it out.

Hey look more dodging.

Do you think the defendants will not have the deposed? They are central to the DNC hack claims.

[boutons_deux]

Dan Abrams: Comey Memos ‘Are Devastating to President Trump’


Dan Abrams said on Good Morning America Friday James Comey‘s newly-released memos suggest President Donald Trump is lying about his conversations with the former FBI director.

“If you take the Comey memos at their word, they’re devastating to President Trump with regard to whether he’s telling the truth.

He wrote these at the time —

let’s remember when these memos were written —

they were written at a time when James Comey presumably wasn’t worried about his job.

And they detail conversations the president says never happened.

If these conversations did happen,

and it sure looks like they did based on these contemporary memos,

it means that the president is lying.”

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/dan-abrams-comey-memos-are-devastating-to-president-trump/

[RandomGuy]

Hey look more dodging.

Do you think the defendants will not have the deposed? They are central to the DNC hack claims.

Attachment A.

[RandomGuy]

:lol Maddow

Hurry...find a Wonkette article

Maddow has a PhD in political science. I guess you prefer your news from dropouts?

[Pavlov]

Hey look more dodging.

Do you think the defendants will not have the deposed? They are central to the DNC hack claims.I don't know.

What are you saying will happen, TSA? Spit it out.

[TSA]

I don't know.

What are you saying will happen, TSA? Spit it out.

I don't know.

[spurraider21]

Maddow has a PhD in political science. I guess you prefer your news from dropouts?
ben shapiro graduated summa cum laude from UCLA in political science and then cum laude from harvard law. how seriously do you take the Daily Wire? or breitbart when he was the editor at large?

[TSA]

Maddow has a PhD in political science. I guess you prefer your news from dropouts?

:lmao

[Pavlov]

I don't know.:lmao TSA's house of innuendo cards collapses under the weight of one simple question.

[RandomGuy]

:lmao


Maddow received a bachelor’s degree in public policy from Stanford University. She earned her doctorate in political science at Oxford University, which she attended on a Rhodes Scholarship.

[Pavlov]

Maddow has a PhD in political science. I guess you prefer your news from dropouts?I'd mention the work experience of some of the sources used here, but it would massively trigger a poster here who shall remain nameless.

[TSA]

:lmao TSA's house of innuendo cards collapses under the weight of one simple question.

Just testing out the Pavlov I don't know machine.

[TSA]

I'd mention the work experience of some of the sources used here, but it would massively trigger a poster here who shall remain nameless.

Sundance and Vachel living rent free in Pavlov's head.

[Pavlov]

Sundance and Vachel living rent free in Pavlov's head.I wasn't talking about them or you.

I'm living rent free in your head.

lol

[RandomGuy]

I'd mention the work experience of some of the sources used here, but it would massively trigger a poster here who shall remain nameless.

It is kinda obvious Dr. Maddow was a sharp person from the first couple times I watched her show. She has to deal with the grind of finding something to talk about for a periodic show, but still the quality of her analysis, even through any bias, is still pretty good.

Contrast that with the dropouts, Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck.

Quite frankly, it wouldn't surprise me if Trump dropped out as well. Dude never has ponied up an actual degree as far as I am aware.

[Pavlov]

Just testing out the Pavlov I don't know machine.You're the one making breathless claims of doom then shutting up when asked simple questions.

[baseline bum]

Damn I never knew Maddow was a Rhodes Scholar, and supposedly the first openly gay American selected.

[TSA]

You're the one making breathless claims of doom then shutting up when asked simple questions.

Asking who the defendants will depose = breathless claims of doom

:lol you are a weird fucker

[Pavlov]

Asking who the defendants will depose = breathless claims of doom

:lol you are a weird fuckerWhat are you saying will happen if they testify, TSA?

[RandomGuy]

Damn I never knew Dr. Maddow was a Rhodes Scholar, and supposedly the first openly gay American selected.

FIFY. :D

[TSA]

What are you saying will happen if they testify, TSA?

If they testify they will have testified.

[RandomGuy]

What are you saying will happen if they testify, TSA?

Did you hear about Attachment A?

Sort of blows the shit out of the Mueller = Hillary investigation thing.

[RandomGuy]

Cohen’s lawyer says this is not about my client’s personal life. Can we put the last part of the transcript back up? He says there are five paragraphs in attachment A that deal with seeking the papers of the President of the United States that are in possession of my client. This case is that. Now, we the public don’t know what attachment a is. We haven’t yet seen attachment a. We think it’s probably either the search warrant that a judge signed to seize stuff for Michael Cohen or maybe in support of that search warrant.

But in any case, I mean presume why someday we’ll see attachment a. This lawyer is saying what the FBI was after when they searched his office, hotel room, all of it, what they were after was information pertaining directly and individually to the president as spelled out in a five paragraph long description of what the FBI was going to seize. So this case is not just oh, trouble for the president’s lawyer who you have seen on TV. This is about the president directly, which may be why the people directly involved in this case appear to be a little rattled as this thing continued to unfold. But as I said, this is unfolding in New York where prosecutors have gotten very very good because they have had lots and lots of experience nailing people in public corruption cases.


https://www.politicususa.com/2018/04/17/rachel-maddow-trump-papers.html

What was being looked for wasn't the papers of Hillary Clinton. Or Podesta.

They didn't talk about the specifics of the warrant, but this slipped out during the courtroom stuff.

[Pavlov]

If they testify they will have testified.So you're saying nothing at all.

Again.

lol TSA

[Pavlov]

Did you hear about Attachment A?

Sort of blows the shit out of the Mueller = Hillary investigation thing.TSA still hasn't made his mind up about Mueller tbh. Needs moar blogs.

[Reck]

987438058449653760

987413106392551424

:lmao

[RandomGuy]

987438058449653760

987413106392551424

:lmao

We will get to see "how many years in prison" loyal Cohen is.

2 years? 10 years?

My guess will be 2 days loyal.

The wheels on the bus go round...
https://marialuisacoca.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/bus.gif?w=300&h=155