Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[djohn2oo8]

At this point it's just more unnamed "sources". Say it is true, what will really come of this being exposed?
Obstruction of justice charges...Doesn't matter Democrat or Republican, it is a big fucking no no to try and tamper and bully the FBI or any intelligence agency to stay quiet..A big mistake. And now it's public.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Obstruction of justice charges...Doesn't matter Democrat or Republican, it is a big fucking no no to try and tamper and bully the FBI or any intelligence agency to stay quiet..A big mistake. And now it's public.
You think someone will be charged with obstruction of justice?

[djohn2oo8]

834932019339616256

[djohn2oo8]

You think someone will be charged with obstruction of justice?

Absolutely. The fact Reince Priebus went on TV and said he knew about what was happening and talked about inside an ongoing investigation presents a big problem for Trump.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Absolutely. The fact Reince Priebus went on TV and said he knew about what was happening and talked about inside an ongoing investigation presents a big problem for Trump.
Who will be charged with obstruction of justice?

[Reck]

Absolutely. The fact Reince Priebus went on TV and said he knew about what was happening and talked about inside an ongoing investigation presents a big problem for Trump.

There will just probably be a lot of repositioning within the staff at the WH.

This isn't a huge deal really. It just makes the Trump administration look really inept and incompetent.

[djohn2oo8]

Who will be charged with obstruction of justice?

Priebus will be the first.

[djohn2oo8]

There will just probably be a lot of repositioning within the staff at the WH.

This isn't a huge deal really. It just makes the Trump administration look really inept and incompetent.

No sir. It IS a huge deal to ask the FBI to lie for you. It's a bad look and a huge story. Don't underestimate it.

[djohn2oo8]

834937361565908993

[Winehole23]

You think someone will be charged with obstruction of justice?Jeff Sessions investigate Trump and press charges? Very doubtful.

[djohn2oo8]

Jeff Sessions investigate Trump and press charges? Very doubtful.

Would have to recuse himself.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Priebus will be the first.
Want to wager your account?

[Reck]

Want to wager your account?

What's with you and betting accounts? You enjoy being cucked, dont you? :lol

[Winehole23]

Would have to recuse himself.would be up to him. I don't think he can be forced to recuse himself.

[djohn2oo8]

Want to wager your account?

Sure. This will not end well for Trump and his staff. Maybe Pence will make it.out okay.

[TheSanityAnnex]

What's with you and betting accounts? You enjoy being cucked, dont you? :lol
I like watching people make claims and then fail to back them up. I really like watching people like yourself accept the bets only to welsh and have that label stick with them for as long as they are here.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Sure. This will not end well for Trump and his staff. Maybe Pence will make it.out okay.Terms:
Priebus will be the first charged with obstruction of justice.

ELE bet accepted.

[Reck]

I like watching people make claims and then fail to back them up. I really like watching people like yourself accept the bets only to welsh and have that label stick with them for as long as they are here.

The thing is...it hasn't stuck. :lol

You have a serious problem where no one takes you seriously. I enjoy cucking you.

I enjoyed your meltdowns afterward.

[djohn2oo8]

834936578900385792

[TheSanityAnnex]

The thing is...it hasn't stuck. :lol

You have a serious problem where no one takes you seriously. I enjoy cucking you.

I enjoyed your meltdowns afterward.
Start a thread titled Spurstalk top 5 welsh moments if you don't believe me

[djohn2oo8]

834944243743485952

[Reck]

Start a thread titled Spurstalk top 5 welsh moments if you don't believe me

No one would care..or know.

Your ill fated bet was made on the political forum where not everyone comes into.

But If I were to make a thread about the biggest conspiracies and dumb fucks you'd be right up there with Cosmored. Fact. Anywhere posted.

[CosmicCowboy]

No one would care..or know.

Your ill fated bet was made on the political forum where not everyone comes into.

But If I were to make a thread about the biggest conspiracies and dumb fucks you'd be right up there with Cosmored. Fact. Anywhere posted.

LOL

His defense is not everyone is the world knows he is a lying, welching faggot. :lol

[Reck]

LOL

His defense is not everyone is the world knows he is a lying, welching faggot. :lol

Cosmicgayboy gives his shit take. You would also be in the biggest dumb fuck list. Your ST lifespan consists of constantly butting in and getting shut down. :lol

[djohn2oo8]

834943376311087104

[Reck]

834943376311087104

Is this blowing up on TV as much as it is on Twitter?

I'm getting my redneck on watching NASCAR. :lol

[djohn2oo8]

Is this blowing up on TV as much as it is on Twitter?

I'm getting my redneck on watching NASCAR. :lol
Yessir. Top story on every major news channel.

[Reck]

Yessir. Top story on every major news channel.

The senate cant get back soon enough. This and the Russian investigation should end up with some serious consequence. Just not sure impeachment is gonna be the end result sadly.

[DarrinS]

US media hysteria over Russia -- exactly what Putin wants.

[spurraider21]

US media hysteria over Russia -- exactly what Putin wants.im sure the watergate hysteria was exactly what nixon wanted too

[djohn2oo8]

Holy fuck at Trump's meltdown on Twitter :lmao

[lefty]

Holy fuck at Trump's meltdown on Twitter :lmao
:lol forced to tweet on a Galaxy S3

[boutons_deux]

John Oliver Breaks Down President Trump’s ‘Weird, Noticeably Soft Spot’ For Russia


http://www.mediaite.com/online/john-oliver-breaks-down-trumps-weird-noticeably-soft-spot-for-russia-fcking-embarrassing/

[boutons_deux]

House Republicans are putting the kibosh on attempts to force disclosure on Russian ties, conflicts of interest

Jeff Sessions would be required to provide communication about ““criminal or counterintelligence investigations"

Congressmen such as House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, (http://www.salon.com/2017/02/10/do-your-job-jason-chaffetz-town-hall-overrun-with-constituents-demanding-he-investigate-trump/) R-Utah, and other Republicans (http://www.salon.com/2017/02/22/shame-on-mitch-republican-members-of-congress-are-being-met-by-vocal-and-angry-constituents/) may have been denounced by their own constituents for failing to hold President Donald Trump accountable, but that isn’t stopping House Republicans from squashing a bill to do just that.

A Democratic resolution planned for next week that would have compelled Trump to disclose his potential conflicts of interest and ties to Russia is going to be sent to the House Judiciary Committee for a panel vote on Tuesday, according to a number of House sources who spoke to Politico (http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/trump-conflicts-house-resolution-235288). Because the committee is controlled by the Republican Party, it is likely that they will kill the resolution.

http://www.salon.com/2017/02/23/house-republicans-are-putting-the-kibash-on-attempts-to-force-disclosure-on-russian-ties-conflicts-of-interest/

Repugs are traitors.

[Winehole23]

US media hysteria over Russia -- exactly what Putin wants.Yep.

The paranoid fixation on Putin to the exclusion of self-reflection by the Dems is Putinesque:

https://theintercept.com/2017/02/23/the-increasingly-unhinged-russia-rhetoric-comes-from-a-long-standing-u-s-playbook/

[Winehole23]

somewhat more predictable that The Nation would be anti-anti-Russians. the left isn't a monolith any more than the right:





The bipartisan, nearly full-political-spectrum tsunami of factually unverified allegations that President Trump has been sedi-
tiously “compromised” by the Kremlin, with scarcely any nonpartisan pushback from influential political or media sources, is deeply alarming. Begun by the Clinton campaign in mid-2016, and exemplified now by New York Times columnists (who write of a “Trump-Putin regime” in Washington), strident MSNBC hosts, and unbalanced CNN commentators, the practice is growing into a latter-day McCarthyite hysteria. Such politically malignant practices should be deplored wherever they appear, whether on the part of conservatives, liberals, or progressives.

https://www.thenation.com/article/why-we-must-oppose-the-kremlin-baiting-against-trump/

[boutons_deux]

Yep.

The paranoid fixation on Putin to the exclusion of self-reflection by the Dems is Putinesque:

https://theintercept.com/2017/02/23/the-increasingly-unhinged-russia-rhetoric-comes-from-a-long-standing-u-s-playbook/

The "fixation" is not on Putin.

It's on Trash and his team probably being compromised by Putin, not above, but under suspicion, while obviously being protected by Repugs, who very probably know Trash is a 100% illegitimate Pres, compromised by Putin and his oligarchs floating Trash's failed orgs in corrupt Russian $Bs.

[DarrinS]

im sure the watergate hysteria was exactly what nixon wanted too

MSM has been obsessed with Russia for months. Better not come up empty.

[DarrinS]

Yep.

The paranoid fixation on Putin to the exclusion of self-reflection by the Dems is Putinesque:

https://theintercept.com/2017/02/23/the-increasingly-unhinged-russia-rhetoric-comes-from-a-long-standing-u-s-playbook/


Thanks for the link.

[DarrinS]

It's kind of a dangerous game they're playing. If you know that Trump is a thin-skinned, belligerent, narcissist, why would you ratchet up tensions between US and Russia?

Take this exchange between Major Garrett and Trump for example:

Garrett: “Is Putin testing you, do you believe, sir?”

Trump: "There’s no upside. We’re a very powerful nuclear country and so are they. I’ve been briefed. I can tell you one thing about a briefing, that we’re allowed to say because anybody that ever read the most basic book can say it, nuclear holocaust would be like no other. They’re a very powerful nuclear country, and so are we. If we have a good relationship with Russia — believe me — that’s a good thing, not a bad thing."


It appears that they want to either a) bait him into taking a very hard line on Russia or b) make him appear soft on Russia, which might suggest (to some) that there is some cozy relationship between Trump-Putin.

[Winehole23]

regardless of whether such a relationship already exists -- or not -- Trump stands to gain a great deal personally from better relations with Russia, no?

[Winehole23]

Regardless of whether Trump is a crook, his failure to disclose his finances or divest from his businesses will leave him looking like the biggest crook ever to hold high office in the US.

For the record, I think he is.

[DarrinS]

regardless of whether such a relationship already exists -- or not -- Trump stands to gain a great deal personally from better relations with Russia, no?

Certainly nothing to gain by having worse relations

[Winehole23]

depends on perspective. cui bono?

[Spurminator]

Where was this appreciation for diplomacy when we were accusing previous presidents of being soft for so much as talking to tyranical world leaders?

[boutons_deux]

regardless of whether such a relationship already exists -- or not -- Trump stands to gain a great deal personally from better relations with Russia, no?

The goal is to get sanctions lifted so Rexxon gets $500B gas/oil deal with Putin.

The big winner is the Putin oligarchy with $Ts more wealth, which will enormously empower Putin's Long Game for a new Russian empire at the expense of America's empire.

Trash's isolationism is EXACTLY what Pootin is dictating.

Yes, Trash's OBSESSION with Russia is ALWAYS for himself, already floating in $100Ms, or more, of Russian money, with promise of much more to come.

Step the fuck back. WTF is going on with Trash, Repugs and their suggestible cretin supporters becoming SO PRO-RUSSIAN?

It's so weird, unforeseen, that is simply can't be legit or innocent.

And how does Trash and Repugs being so pro-Russian benefit USA?

[Winehole23]

Where was this appreciation for diplomacy when we were accusing previous presidents of being soft for so much as talking to tyranical world leaders?Where you stand depends on where you sit.

[Winehole23]

to beat a dog, use any available stick

[Spurminator]

I mean I'm totally good with having positive relations with Russia and Iran.

Glad the warhawks have changed their tune somewhat, even if it's conveniently selective.

[DarrinS]

Some people are sad they can't get their daily fix of NYT Trump-Putin bromance coverage :lol

No Trump/Russia story in front page digital NYT this morning. If you want to know, go to Twitter


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2017/2/24/1637080/-No-Trump-Russia-story-in-front-page-digital-NYT-this-morning-If-you-want-to-know-go-to-Twitter




If you want to know what has happened and what’s happening right now on a daily basis regarding the most important story in our country’s history (Trump/Russia), your best bet is to follow these serious and responsible Twitter accounts:

•@sarahkendzior
•@Khanoisseur
•@MalcolmNance
•@funder
•@LouiseMensch

[DarrinS]

I mean I'm totally good with having positive relations with Russia and Iran.

Glad the warhawks have changed their tune somewhat, even if it's conveniently selective.


The more hawkish candidate just lost the election.




Because....Russia

[Spurminator]

The more hawkish candidate just lost the election.

Yeah I'm sure Trump's more diplomatic peacekeeping tendencies are what won him the election.

[boutons_deux]

Where was this appreciation for diplomacy when we were accusing previous presidents of being soft for so much as talking to tyranical world leaders?

those "world" leaders? who?

Which ones had intention of replacing USA's Empire, or degrading it, in preference for their own empire?

[Spurminator]

those "world" leaders? who?

Which ones had intention of replacing USA's Empire, or degrading it, in preference for their own empire?

Shut up.

[boutons_deux]

Shut up.

G F Y, my little bitch

[Winehole23]

Yeah I'm sure Trump's more diplomatic peacekeeping tendencies are what won him the election.sort ill with increasing military spending, beefing up the nuclear arsenal and projecting strength toward Iran and Syria.

Trump as the candidate of peace is frankly laughable.

[spurraider21]

I mean I'm totally good with having positive relations with Russia and Iran.

Glad the warhawks have changed their tune somewhat, even if it's conveniently selective.
Not to mention Cuba

[djohn2oo8]

835167156144861184

:lmao dumbass trump supporters

[djohn2oo8]

835168062559023106

[Reck]

835152634545901568

Such faggots.

[djohn2oo8]

835147465560973313

[TheSanityAnnex]

835147465560973313

On our ELE bet how long are we waiting to see if Priebus is the first charged with obstruction of justice?

[hater]

I mean I'm totally good with having positive relations with Russia and Iran.

Glad the warhawks have changed their tune somewhat, even if it's conveniently selective.


The warhawks have NOT changed their tune. lyndsey Warhammer and John Mcnuke want a war regardless and are working toward it

Oh and Trumps stance to peace to Russia and war with ISIS did have a big effect on the election

Sadly looks like Trump wants war with Iran so all this "peace" bullshit is probably going out the window very soon

[spurraider21]

Don't think trump is a hawk. But he's egotistical and impulsive, so end result could be the same.

[djohn2oo8]

835214691756572672

:lol

[djohn2oo8]

On our ELE bet how long are we waiting to see if Priebus is the first charged with obstruction of justice?

Within 2 months.

[djohn2oo8]

835204383700828161

[djohn2oo8]

835223037486202882

Good job Trump on pissING off Intel agencies and the media. That will go over smoothly :lol

[TheSanityAnnex]

Within 2 months.
Plenty of time to prepare your obituary

Following an administration meeting the next morning, according to the White House, McCabe told Priebus there was nothing to the New York Times’ report, using a colorful phrase. Priebus asked: “What can we do about this?” McCabe gave no answer, and told the White House chief of staff he would get back to Priebus on the issue.
Priebus told McCabe the White House was “getting crushed” over the depth of Trump’s ties to Russia, as reported in the New York Times, and asked: “What am I supposed to do?”

Some time later, senior administration officials told reporters, McCabe called Priebus and said: “We’d love to help but we can’t get into the position of making statements on every story.”
Priebus then asked if he could cite anonymous senior intelligence officials in rebutting the Times article, to which McCabe agreed.
Afterward, FBI director James Comey called Priebus and echoed McCabe’s comments. While the story was baseless, Comey declined to issue an FBI statement saying so publicly, according to senior officials.
Asked by the Guardian whether the bureau challenges the White House’s version of events, the FBI declined to comment.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/feb/24/donald-trump-russia-reince-priebus-fbi-talks-james-comey?CMP=twt_gu

[Thread]

835223037486202882

Good job Trump on pissING off Intel agencies and the media. That will go over smoothly :lol

Good.

[djohn2oo8]

835303137506443264
Reck this is when shit hits the fan

[djohn2oo8]

835331531937808384

[djohn2oo8]

835291093726072833

[djohn2oo8]

835324527135633409

[djohn2oo8]

835479951935692800

[boutons_deux]

835479951935692800

amazing, from such a 100% mainstream Repug, Bannon, Miller, Gorka will take him down

[DarrinS]

Lol, McCarthyism

Go for it

[Winehole23]

WH pressuring the FBI to cover up looks bad regardless of what it is.

[Reck]

835303137506443264
Reck (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14412) this is when shit hits the fan

The thing is people in high power only get a slap on the wrist. None of these idiots will face jail time. At the most they'll get "retired."

Which works for me as long as these super corrupts get removed.

[TheSanityAnnex]

I see John Podesta has joined the Washington Post staff :lol

[spurraider21]

Lol, McCarthyism

Go for itbut it isn't. mccarthy was paranoid and had no basis for many of his allegations. we know that trump's team was in contact with russian officials. they aren't just saying "omg trump in bed with russia" despite having no knowledge of communications

[TheSanityAnnex]

we know that trump's team was in contact with russian officials. what exactly was said by Trump's team to Russian officials, be specific.

[Thread]

but it isn't. mccarthy was paranoid and had no basis for many of his allegations. we know that trump's team was in contact with russian officials. they aren't just saying "omg trump in bed with russia" despite having no knowledge of communications

Except like illegal aliens---communists had/have no business in this country.

[Thread]

what exactly was said by Trump's team to Russian officials, be specific.

tick tock, tick tock, tick tock, tick tock, tick tock, tick tock.........

[Reck]

tick tock, tick tock, tick tock, tick tock, tick tock, tick tock.........

In time we should know one way or the other.

That's what has you waking up in the middle of the night after all, right cub?

[djohn2oo8]

what exactly was said by Trump's team to Russian officials, be specific.

Removing sanctions.

[Thread]

In time we should know one way or the other.

That's what has you waking up in the middle of the night after all, right cub?

That's what I thought.

[Thread]

Removing sanctions.

FAKE NEWS

[spurraider21]

what exactly was said by Trump's team to Russian officials, be specific.i dont have the transcripts. all i know is that they were having communications, flynn and the ambassador specifically discussed sanctions, and now we also know the white house asked the FBI to publicly quash the media reports

[spurraider21]

FAKE NEWSso why did they fire Flynn?

[Reck]

i dont have the transcripts. all i know is that they were having communications, flynn and the ambassador specifically discussed sanctions, and now we also know the white house asked the FBI to publicly quash the media reports

Show him the emails. TSA likes these information in email batches.

[Thread]

so why did they fire Flynn?

Asked & answered.

[djohn2oo8]

FAKE NEWS

Real news. AND the White house interferes with the investigation. Real news.

[Thread]

Real news. AND the White house interferes with the investigation. Real news.

FAKE NEWS

[djohn2oo8]

FAKE NEWS

Real news. Also, Trump has a Russian spy on his staff. Real news.

[djohn2oo8]

Running scared Donny? The walls closing in on ya

835608648625836032

[Thread]

Real news. Also, Trump has a Russian spy on his staff. Real news.

FAKE NEWS

[Thread]

Running scared Donny? The walls closing in on ya

835608648625836032

Trump spit right in their eye. Let 'em sit there like the pack of rats they are.

P.S., And FOX---didn't even have the sack to state on air that they stood with CNN, et al. tee, hee.

[djohn2oo8]

835537442551668737

Cover up and time is a tickin Donny.

[Thread]

835537442551668737

Cover up and time is a tickin Donny.

- "Promises, promises."

- Ernie "The Cat" Ladd

[djohn2oo8]

835612044862832642

Cover up and time is a tickin Donny.

[Thread]

835612044862832642

Cover up and time is a tickin Donny.

& yet it's Bill Clinton the lone duly elected President to be IMPEACHED.

ha, ha.

[DarrinS]

Get on with the investigation already. Let's see what they find.

[Thread]

Get on with the investigation already. Let's see what they find.

Precisely, my level headed friend.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Removing sanctions.

Link with named source

[TheSanityAnnex]

i dont have the transcripts. all i know is that they were having communications, flynn and the ambassador specifically discussed sanctions, and now we also know the white house asked the FBI to publicly quash the media reports
Who said they specifically discussed sanctions? Link and name.

Publicly quash? Direct quotes from WH and FBI much different. Link and quote to WH asking FBI to "quash", direct quote and name.

[djohn2oo8]

Link with named source

Who names their sources in an article?

[Thread]

Who names their sources in an article?

Ipso facto:::FAKE NEWS

[Winehole23]

you lauded it when it was happening to HRC, now it's FAKE NEWS :cry

[Reck]

Who names their sources in an article?

While you're ad it, make sure to post the address, too.

TSA :lol

[Thread]

you lauded it when it was happening to HRC, now it's FAKE NEWS :cry

That was your ox.

[Winehole23]

actually, it wasn't. I had the knives out for HRC too.

[Winehole23]

still do. I hate HRC.

[Thread]

actually, it wasn't. I had the knives out for HRC too.

Of course.:rolleyes

[Winehole23]

check my trend of posting. you'll find nothing in her favor.

[DarrinS]

Please please please investigate this ASAP.

[Winehole23]

don't hold your breath. it'll be slow walked, then shortened, then Trump will be cleared.

then you'll point to the scoreboard of a crooked game.

[Winehole23]

Trump should just release his tax returns.

if he's honest, what does he have to hide?

[Winehole23]

every other president the last 40 years did it. why won't he?

[Winehole23]

DJT could clear this up instantly.

[Thread]

every other president the last 40 years did it. why won't he?

Because it's not the law. I don't want to see his. I don't want him to see mine. I don't want to see yours. On & on.

[Winehole23]

I'd like to know he's not putting his interests ahead of the public interest. As it stands, we can't tell.

[Thread]

I'd like to know he's not putting his interests ahead of the public interest. As it stands, we can't tell.

Then enact a law and compel him. Otherwise, you're SOL.

[boutons_deux]

I'd like to know he's not putting his interests ahead of the public interest. As it stands, we can't tell.



of course we can tell, know definitely.



There's a huge coverup of the corrupt, criminal, traitorous involvement between Trash and his team with Pootin.

[Pelicans78]

& yet it's Bill Clinton the lone duly elected President to be IMPEACHED.

ha, ha.

Nixon was about to get impeached as well. He happened to resign before then.

[Winehole23]

Then enact a law and compel him. Otherwise, you're SOL.Not at all.

There's an election in four years. Ifnit appears anytime before then that POTUS is too conflicted and has become a political liability, the US Congress will throw him overboard.

[Thread]

Nixon was about to get impeached as well. He happened to resign before then.

Dude, he had phlebitis. That's why he left office.

[Winehole23]

the phlebitis was real, but...


On the night of August 7, 1974, Senators Barry Goldwater (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Goldwater) and Hugh Scott (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_Scott) and Representative John Rhodes met with Nixon in the Oval Office and told him that his support in Congress had all but disappeared. Rhodes told Nixon that he would face certain impeachment when the articles came up for vote in the full House. Goldwater and Scott told the president that there were not only enough votes in the Senate to convict him, but that no more than 15 Senators were willing to vote for acquittal – far fewer than the 34 he needed to avoid removal from officehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_process_against_Richard_Nixon

[Winehole23]

on the night of August 8, 1974, Nixon took to the airwaves and delivered SP 3-125: Presidential Address Announcing His Intention to Resign the Oval Office (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SP_3-125:_Presidential_Address_Announcing_His_Intention _to_Resign_the_Oval_Office). And then on the day of August 9, 1974, Nixon became the first, and so far only, president to resign

[Pelicans78]

Dude, he had phlebitis. That's why he left office.

Convenient excuse. He was gonna get arrested before he re-signed.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Who names their sources in an article?
People with verifiable information

[Thread]

Convenient excuse. He was gonna get arrested before he re-signed.

Bill Clinton remains the sole duly elected President to be IMPEACHED.

[djohn2oo8]

People with verifiable information

No journalist names sources. None.

[Pelicans78]

Bill Clinton remains the sole duly elected President to be IMPEACHED.

McM is NSA not Comrade Flynn

[Reck]

People with verifiable information

For someone who likes to post leaks and shit, you sure know jack shit of how whistle blowers, anonymous sources, etc works. :lol

I mean, isn't that one of wikileaks motto? Never reveal sources?

[TheSanityAnnex]

No journalist names sources. None.
Journalists name sources every day.

[TheSanityAnnex]

For someone who likes to post leaks and shit, you sure know jack shit of how whistle blowers, anonymous sources, etc works. :lol

I mean, isn't that one of wikileaks motto? Never reveal sources?
Wikileaks verifies information and produces the actual documents.

[Reck]

Wikileaks verifies information and produces the actual documents.

The information that have surface so far has panned out. The Flynn thing was dead on. And giving that the FBI is actually investigating possible russian hacking, someone on the inside and in the know is talking to the media and leaking this stuff.

Also, didn't Trump himself said the leaks were real?

[mavsfan1000]

The information that have surface so far has panned out. The Flynn thing was dead on. And giving that the FBI is actually investigating possible russian hacking, someone on the inside and in the know is talking to the media and leaking this stuff.

Also, didn't Trump himself said the leaks were real?
He also said the news was fake.

[TheSanityAnnex]

The information that have surface so far has panned out. The Flynn thing was dead on. And giving that the FBI is actually investigating possible russian hacking, someone on the inside and in the know is talking to the media and leaking this stuff.

Also, didn't Trump himself said the leaks were real?



The FBI already investigated and listened to the Flynn phone calls and said they found no wrongdoing and no illicit ties to Russia.

Trump said the leaking was real, not that leaks themselves were real.

What information that has surfaced from anonymous sources has panned out? What information from anonymous sources has been verified?

[Reck]

He also said the news was fake.

Which is fucking retarded.

You cant say the news is fake...but the leaks are real when the media was the one who reported it. :lol

[Reck]

The FBI already investigated and listened to the Flynn phone calls and said they found no wrongdoing and no illicit ties to Russia.

Trump said the leaking was real, not that leaks themselves were real.

What information that has surfaced from anonymous sources has panned out? What information from anonymous sources has been verified?

LMAO you're such a tool. Goalpost mover. Fuck outta here.

[TheSanityAnnex]

LMAO you're such a tool. Goalpost mover. Fuck outta here.

I'm directly addressing your post.

This is the second time recently you've tried to claim a goalpost move and I'm now convinced you don't know what the term implies.

Now you have three questions to answer.

What information that has surfaced from anonymous sources has panned out?

What information from anonymous sources has been verified?

What goalpost did I move?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Which is fucking retarded.

You cant say the news is fake...but the leaks are real when the media was the one who reported it. :lol

"Anonymous WH source says Trump has a vagina"

the leak is real, the news is fake.

See how that works

[Reck]

I'm directly addressing your post.

This is the second time recently you've tried to claim a goalpost move and I'm now convinced you don't know what the term implies.

Now you have three questions to answer.

What information that has surfaced from anonymous sources has panned out?

What information from anonymous sources has been verified?

What goalpost did I move?

You're the biggest goalpost moving faggot in here. Not to mention you're shittty at spinning things too.

I just posted that Trump himself said the leaks were real which means the stuff that's being leaked is real and you go on a tangent about how Trump meant this and not that. That is moving the goalpost.

Your main point was crushed so you try to make it into something else to continue the pointless arguement.

[Pelicans78]

The FBI already investigated and listened to the Flynn phone calls and said they found no wrongdoing and no illicit ties to Russia.

Trump said the leaking was real, not that leaks themselves were real.

What information that has surfaced from anonymous sources has panned out? What information from anonymous sources has been verified?

He discussed sanctions with the Russian Ambassador and then lied about it. Why lie about it?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/national-security-adviser-flynn-discussed-sanctions-with-russian-ambassador-despite-denials-officials-say/2017/02/09/f85b29d6-ee11-11e6-b4ff-ac2cf509efe5_story.html?utm_term=.7b4930355b9c

[TheSanityAnnex]

You're the biggest goalpost moving faggot in here. Not to mention you're shittty at spinning things too.

I just posted that Trump himself said the leaks were real which means the stuff that's being leaked is real and you go on a tangent about how Trump meant this and not that. That is moving the goalpost.

Your main point was crushed so you try to make it into something else to continue the pointless arguement.

That isn't moving the goalpost that is correcting you when you are wrong.

Trump did say that leaks were real, as in leaks were happening. Trump never said the contents of the leaks were real, in fact he said the opposite.

How can you say my main point has been crushed when you've now twice refused to address it?

[Reck]

That isn't moving the goalpost that is correcting you when you are wrong.

Trump did say that leaks were real, as in leaks were happening. Trump never said the contents of the leaks were real, in fact he said the opposite.

How can you say my main point has been crushed when you've now twice refused to address it?

No it's not.

One example would be what Pelicans just posted. You're correcting me for posting correct facts? LOL

You're doing it again. You move the goalpost constantly. It isnt something new with you.

You like putting words in people's mouth. Specially ones who have gone on the record. It's not your job to interpret something somebody said..repeately and then try to shill for them saying no, this is what he meant.

[TheSanityAnnex]

He discussed sanctions with the Russian Ambassador and then lied about it. Why lie about it?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/national-security-adviser-flynn-discussed-sanctions-with-russian-ambassador-despite-denials-officials-say/2017/02/09/f85b29d6-ee11-11e6-b4ff-ac2cf509efe5_story.html?utm_term=.7b4930355b9c

No idea why he lied about it as the FBI said there was no wrongdoing or anything illicit on Flynn's part.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/world/national-security/fbi-reviewed-flynns-calls-with-russian-ambassador-but-found-nothing-illicit/2017/01/23/aa83879a-e1ae-11e6-a547-5fb9411d332c_story.html

[djohn2oo8]

No idea why he lied about it as the FBI said there was no wrongdoing or anything illicit on Flynn's part.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/world/national-security/fbi-reviewed-flynns-calls-with-russian-ambassador-but-found-nothing-illicit/2017/01/23/aa83879a-e1ae-11e6-a547-5fb9411d332c_story.html

Lol Flynn is getting immunity to snitch on those rat bastards.

[TheSanityAnnex]

No it's not.

One example would be what Pelicans just posted. You're correcting me for posting correct facts? LOL

You're doing it again. You move the goalpost constantly. It isnt something new with you.

You like putting words in people's mouth. Specially ones who have gone on the record. It's not your job to interpret something somebody said..repeately and then try to shill for them saying no, this is what he meant.:lol the fucking irony


I just posted that Trump himself said the leaks were real which means the stuff that's being leaked is real

These are your words, not mine.

I challenge you to find a quote of Donald Trump saying the stuff that's being leaked is real

[Pelicans78]

No idea why he lied about it as the FBI said there was no wrongdoing or anything illicit on Flynn's part.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/world/national-security/fbi-reviewed-flynns-calls-with-russian-ambassador-but-found-nothing-illicit/2017/01/23/aa83879a-e1ae-11e6-a547-5fb9411d332c_story.html

Your link is from January 23rd while mine is from February 9 which states the FBI is still continuing to investigate his communications with the Russian ambassador. The fact is he did discuss sanctions, but it's not proven yet whether he promised the Russians about removing sanctions which would be against the law.

[Reck]

:lol the fucking irony


[/COLOR]
These are your words, not mine.

I challenge you to find a quote of Donald Trump saying the stuff that's being leaked is real

Too easy..

“The real story here is why are there so many illegal leaks coming out of Washington?” he wrote. “Will these leaks be happening as I deal on N. Korea etc?”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/02/14/trump-says-the-real-story-is-illegal-leaks-following-flynns-resignation/?utm_term=.40275e0b5e69

He's implying the imformation is real as well. Leaks are only damaging if true.

“I think this really was the death by a thousand leaks,” Laura Ingraham, a conservative news commentator, said on Fox News. “The leaks that were coming out of this administration and the transition — before the administration — were at a level that I don't remember seeing for quite some time.”

"Not long before Trump tweeted, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, said on Fox that “somebody in the nebulous intelligence community” would have had access to the information about Flynn's calls.

“Who tapped the phones? Who is listening to it? Who leaked it? I think those are legitimate questions to ask,” Johnson said Tuesday morning."

There are a lot of self contradictions here. The leaks are real, the news is fake. Illegal leaks..which by omission means you know said information is legit. Will go after leakers because they commited an illegal act. :lol

[mavsfan1000]

Which is fucking retarded.

You cant say the news is fake...but the leaks are real when the media was the one who reported it. :lol
Simple. They go beyond the leak with their fake conspiracy with Russia.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Too easy..

“The real story here is why are there so many illegal leaks coming out of Washington?” he wrote. “Will these leaks be happening as I deal on N. Korea etc?”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/02/14/trump-says-the-real-story-is-illegal-leaks-following-flynns-resignation/?utm_term=.40275e0b5e69

He's implying the imformation is real as well. Leaks are only damaging if true.

“I think this really was the death by a thousand leaks,” Laura Ingraham, a conservative news commentator, said on Fox News. “The leaks that were coming out of this administration and the transition — before the administration — were at a level that I don't remember seeing for quite some time.”

"Not long before Trump tweeted, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, said on Fox that “somebody in the nebulous intelligence community” would have had access to the information about Flynn's calls.

“Who tapped the phones? Who is listening to it? Who leaked it? I think those are legitimate questions to ask,” Johnson said Tuesday morning."

There are a lot of self contradictions here. The leaks are real, the news is fake. Illegal leaks..which by omission means you know said information is legit. Will go after leakers because they commited an illegal act. :lolleaks are only damaging if true :lol

Nothing you posted has Trump saying the content of the leaks are true. You shit on yourself when you said Trump was implying. You are putting words in Trump's mouth. Pretty funny you just accused me of doing that.

Trump said the leaks are real, but the content of the leaks is fake. Not sure why you are having a hard time with this one.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Your link is from January 23rd while mine is from February 9 which states the FBI is still continuing to investigate his communications with the Russian ambassador. The fact is he did discuss sanctions, but it's not proven yet whether he promised the Russians about removing sanctions which would be against the law.
I tried your link again and have no more free WaPo articles for the month. In your article who said Flynn discussed sanctions? Strange that someone working in an active investigation would make such a comment publicly.

[Reck]

leaks are only damaging if true :lol

Nothing you posted has Trump saying the content of the leaks are true. You shit on yourself when you said Trump was implying. You are putting words in Trump's mouth. Pretty funny you just accused me of doing that.

Trump said the leaks are real, but the content of the leaks is fake. Not sure why you are having a hard time with this one.

LOL this faggot just doesn't get it.

Why dont you be usefull and stop dogding my other set of question on the CNN RIP thread.

[TheSanityAnnex]

LOL this faggot just doesn't get it.

Why dont you be usefull and stop dogding my other set of question on the CNN RIP thread.

No rebuttal and off topic deflection attempt.

Is this you admitting you were wrong and had to put words in Trumps mouth to try and back your claim?

[boutons_deux]

the biggest $$$ issue for Russia is getting sanctions lifted, esp so Vlad gets that $500B oil/gas deal with Rexxon

Pootin boytoy, compromised Flynn contacted Russians several times concurrent with new sanctions

fucking DUH!

[Reck]

No rebuttal and off topic deflection attempt.

Is this you admitting you were wrong and had to put words in Trumps mouth to try and back your claim?

I quoted and linked you, faggot. It's all there.

You cant say the leaks are illegal if the leaks are fiction. You're a moron.

[TheSanityAnnex]

I quoted and linked you, faggot. It's all there.

You cant say the leaks are illegal if the leaks are fiction. You're a moron.

Let me simplify this for you Reck.

Have all leaks coming from the WH, DHS, CIA, FBI, etc been true yes or no?

[Reck]

Let me simplify this for you Reck.

Have all leaks coming from the WH, DHS, CIA, FBI, etc been true yes or no?

How about I ask you one question instead...

If the leakers are ever caught..what are they going to be charge with? Fake news? :lol

[djohn2oo8]

How about I ask you one question instead...

If the leakers are ever caught..what are they going to be charge with? Fake news? :lol
:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

Tsa didnt care what was true regarding hillary email leaks

[TheSanityAnnex]

Tsa didnt care what was true regarding hillary email leaks
All Wikileaks email releases were verified authentic through google

[TheSanityAnnex]

How about I ask you one question instead...

If the leakers are ever caught..what are they going to be charge with? Fake news? :lol

Stop deflecting. Answer the question or just admit you put words in Trumps mouth.

[TheSanityAnnex]

:lmao

You've only got about 10 days left on your account. You should spend your time wisely and post as many unsubstantiated tweets as you can find.

[djohn2oo8]

All Wikileaks email releases were verified authentic through google

:lmao :lmao :lmao Christ almighty

[djohn2oo8]

You've only got about 10 days left on your account. You should spend your time wisely and post as many unsubstantiated tweets as you can find.

I said 2 months or can you count?

[TheSanityAnnex]

I said 2 months or can you count?
I thought you said two weeks. My bad.

Enjoy your two months.

[TheSanityAnnex]

:lmao :lmao :lmao Christ almighty

the emails digital signatures were verified. John Podesta last week said they were his emails.

Find me one email Wikileaks doctored.

[TheSanityAnnex]

While you're looking for that maybe you can help Reck find a quote of Trump saying the content of the leaks are true.

[Reck]

While you're looking for that maybe you can help Reck find a quote of Trump saying the content of the leaks are true.

You have already being ethered enough today. Do not further embarrass yourself.

You refuse to answer my questions but expect me to answer your dumb ones without basis.

[TheSanityAnnex]

You have already being ethered enough today. Do not further embarrass yourself.

You refuse to answer my questions but expect me to answer your dumb ones without basis.



your highlights from today

claim goalpost move and then do just that
claim words are be putting in mouth and then do just that with Trump (lol implying)
claim false leaks can't be damaging

I'm happy to continue on pressing you to admit you were wrong

[djohn2oo8]

836190057753100288
Reck

[djohn2oo8]

836201897371516928

[boutons_deux]

huge coverup of Trash and his accomplices being compromised by Putin, with Russian oligarch friend and out-bailer Ross being added to Trash's wing of the Russian mafia today

[pgardn]

Journalists name sources every day.

And journalists don't name sources EVERYDAY.

You are a partisan hack just like Boots.

[DarrinS]

Breaking news....

Audio of POTUS talking directly to Russian president. Video to follow.

[DarrinS]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNxEDomUlXw

[DarrinS]

Shit, wrong POTUS

[Thread]

Great find, DS.

[Spurminator]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNxEDomUlXw

The controversy has never been about a sitting President talking to Russia.

Are you really this confused about current events?

[djohn2oo8]

The controversy has never been about a sitting President talking to Russia.

Are you really this confused about current events?

:rollin

[Reck]

836190057753100288
Reck (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14412)

The faggot just flat out put the FBI on blast saying they came to them about squashing the story. :lmao

[Thread]

The faggot just flat out put the FBI on blast saying they came to them about squashing the story. :lmao

That's last week's news, Recky.

[DarrinS]

Where's the beef?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlzQhA16KrI

[djohn2oo8]

Where's the beef?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlzQhA16KrI

Hmm the.guy on Trump's transition team not wanting to investigate himself. :lmao

[Reck]

Where's the beef?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlzQhA16KrI

No shit. Investigation hasn't even started and this guy says there is nothing there. :lol

Partisan hack.

[djohn2oo8]

836311612361441282

Ryan just teabagging Cully TSA and darrin.

[Reck]

835897340837920768

835898424054657024
TheSanityAnnex why is Sean Spicer worried about fake leaks scrah? :lol

[djohn2oo8]

Spicer cracking down on leaks and then that gets leaked :rollin

[djohn2oo8]

835897340837920768

835898424054657024
TheSanityAnnex why is Sean Spicer worried about fake leaks scrah? :lol

Trump worried bout dem leaks

836362999925452800

[Thread]

Trump worried bout dem leaks

836362999925452800

Like Trump's sustained concentration on (illegal votes) this sustained targeting of (leaks) can breed nothing but positive return.

[djohn2oo8]

Like Trump's sustained concentration on (illegal votes) this sustained targeting of (leaks) can breed nothing but positive return.

You need a warrant to seize phones. :lol

[Reck]

You need a warrant to seize phones. :lol

They gave them up willingly though.

The poor bastards are in a vine. Dont give up your shit, you get fired. :lol

[Th'Pusher]

Like Trump's sustained concentration on (illegal votes) this sustained targeting of (leaks) can breed nothing but positive return.

What has come of his sustained concentration on illegal votes?

[Winehole23]

More voter suppression most likely. Republicans don't want more Americans to vote, just the opposite.

[DarrinS]

smoke

[Winehole23]

You smoke?

[djohn2oo8]

836355074947485698

[Thread]

What has come of his sustained concentration on illegal votes?

The illumination of illegal voting. Should tamp down same.

[Thread]

You need a warrant to seize phones. :lol

FAKE NEWS

[Winehole23]

The illumination of illegal voting. Should tamp down same.Then concentrate on absentee ballots and vote harvesting. In person voter fraud is a statistical mirage. It's the very definition of FAKE NEWS.

Voter ID prevents more good Americans (poor, old, rural and sick) from voting than it does fraudsters. It's a cynical ploy to prevent US citizens from voting.

[Winehole23]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...-ballots-cast/ (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/08/06/a-comprehensive-investigation-of-voter-impersonation-finds-31-credible-incidents-out-of-one-billion-ballots-cast/)

[Th'Pusher]

The illumination of illegal voting. Should tamp down same.

Illumination without evidence is infertile.

[Thread]

Illumination without evidence is infertile.

Won't hurt to keep the kettle on the front burner, just below a boil.

[Winehole23]

Thread abjures FAKE NEWS in favor of pure propaganda.

[Winehole23]

smokeit's just smoke! the search for combustion is a witch hunt!

[DarrinS]

A lot of people are going to have egg on their faces when this is all said and done. MSM will take another hit to their credibility.

[pgardn]

Like Trump's sustained concentration on (illegal votes) this sustained targeting of (leaks) can breed nothing but positive return.

Or make you look like a fkn orange clown...

Take the latter.

[Thread]

Or make you look like a fkn orange clown...

Take the latter.

That orange clown ran a train on your ass.

[pgardn]

That orange clown ran a train on your ass.

Our Ass.

We.

US.

He is my president and your president.

[DarrinS]

These people have a diamond-cutting boner to take down the orange Manchuria candidate. If there was something there, it already would've been played.

[Winehole23]

I don't have such a boner because I think Pence would be worse, but if you think this drama is already over, or that nothing more will come to light, you're naive.

[Winehole23]

Trump wouldn't be covering his ass so carefully if he didn't have something -- in all likelihood, a lot of things -- to hide.

[Winehole23]

Face it, Darrin, he's the biggest straight up crook we've ever seen as president. He's straight up enriching himself.

[Winehole23]

Might or might not relate to Russia --m might relate to 20 different countries beside and/or including Russia. DJT is crooked to the max.

[Winehole23]

stinks to high heaven. I can't believe his supporters can't see it.

They probably admire him for it.

[spurraider21]

These people have a diamond-cutting boner to take down the orange Manchuria candidate. If there was something there, it already would've been played.which explains why there has been a witch hunt over hillary emails for over a year

[Winehole23]

tbh HRC deserved the flames for that, but the serial Benghazi investigations were bullshit.

[Winehole23]

the Clinton Foundation stuff she could still go down for and if she does, I would be cool with that.

[spurraider21]

not necessarily disagreeing that she deserves it. but the horseshit "if there was something, we would have known by now" is hilarious... this is a fairly new development

[Thread]

What has come of his sustained concentration on illegal votes?

-Attention-. It CANNOT hurt Trump to have this issue on a back burner. Same with the (leak) shit. The importance, the tool of ATTRITION is terribly underrated. Not everything has to be ID'ed and accomplished in 5 minutes regardless of social norms.

It's as obvious as the nose on your face that the status quo want this (illegal vote shit) off our screens. Same with the (leak shit). The mere idea that Media gets a free ride on lodging (sources) is fantastic on gross examination. THEY don't want gross examination. Media wants that advantage to remain undisturbed, in the dark. Shining light onto it can bring nothing but grief to Media. Trump doesn't have to accomplish his goals on both of these (shits) in a day. He's got the con, he's got the power to put a bank of lights on these issues and keep it there. There is NO DOWNSIDE for him here.

This is yet another example of Trump's affect on our long held shames. The curtains of distraction continue to be pulled back and the ugly truth exposed.

Bully, bully for President Trump.

[DarrinS]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pjo16QamjIc

[spurraider21]

i'm sure djohn will respond promptly with some tweets about how this is the tip of the iceberg

[TheSanityAnnex]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pjo16QamjIc

:lol shooting down every allegation of hers with a disgusted no no no

[boutons_deux]

The crime is Trash's $100Ms indebtedness to Russian kleptocracy, Trash is compromised

[DarrinS]

:lol shooting down every allegation of hers with a disgusted no no no

I'm sure that dude won't be on CNN ever again. :lol

[SnakeBoy]

tbh HRC deserved the flames for that, but the serial Benghazi investigations were bullshit.

lol bitching about Benghazi investigations while you just make shit up about Trump/Russia

[djohn2oo8]

Trumptards will be on the wrong side of history.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Trumptards will be on the wrong side of history.

It's too bad you won't be able to laugh at them from this account

[hater]

Trumptards will be on the wrong side of fake history.

Fify

[DarrinS]

Trumptards will be on the wrong side of history.

Time will tell

[pgardn]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pjo16QamjIc

No crime so far... This is NOT news.

The appalling truth is Trump hired a man and was going to stick with him UNTIL WE found out that Flynn lied about talking to the Russians concerning sanctions. So we got at least two Bill Clintonesque, feel no guilt, LIARS. Look into the camera and just lie.

[Reck]

It's too bad you won't be able to laugh at them from this account

Degenerate gambler. :lol

Lives for losing. Cuck. :lol

[pgardn]

-Attention-. It CANNOT hurt Trump to have this issue on a back burner. Same with the (leak) shit. The importance, the tool of ATTRITION is terribly underrated. Not everything has to be ID'ed and accomplished in 5 minutes regardless of social norms.

It's as obvious as the nose on your face that the status quo want this (illegal vote shit) off our screens. Same with the (leak shit). The mere idea that Media gets a free ride on lodging (sources) is fantastic on gross examination. THEY don't want gross examination. Media wants that advantage to remain undisturbed, in the dark. Shining light onto it can bring nothing but grief to Media. Trump doesn't have to accomplish his goals on both of these (shits) in a day. He's got the con, he's got the power to put a bank of lights on these issues and keep it there. There is NO DOWNSIDE for him here.

This is yet another example of Trump's affect on our long held shames. The curtains of distraction continue to be pulled back and the ugly truth exposed.

Bully, bully for President Trump.

Which is why the press will hound the overgrown ompa loompa till the end. He won't come clean and the press won't back off. And in the meantime nothing gets done. Which might actually be better than Hillary.

We got a guy just blindly bumping into walls he never knew existed or never fathomed what a door might be.

[DarrinS]

No crime so far... This is NOT news.

The appalling truth is Trump hired a man and was going to stick with him UNTIL WE found out that Flynn lied about talking to the Russians concerning sanctions. So we got at least two Bill Clintonesque, feel no guilt, LIARS. Look into the camera and just lie.


He shouldn't have misled Pence. There was no reason to.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Degenerate gambler. :lol

Lives for losing. Cuck. :lol
Unlike your welshing self, djohn will hold up his end of the bet.

[TheSanityAnnex]

He shouldn't have misled Pence. There was no reason to.
What I never understood about the whole thing was that Flynn knew his calls were being listened to.

[djohn2oo8]

836735882300276737

:lmao

[Thread]

Which is why the press will hound the overgrown ompa loompa till the end. He won't come clean and the press won't back off. And in the meantime nothing gets done. Which might actually be better than Hillary.

We got a guy just blindly bumping into walls he never knew existed or never fathomed what a door might be.

The Dems are vowing it's either full citizenship for the 12 million rats, or. nothing. I got nary problem with that. Let them lives their lives illegally in the shadows.

He mopped the fuckin' floor with Hillary Clinton. And nothing is going to change that.

[Thread]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pjo16QamjIc

Ruh, roh. This is a solid sign they haven't got anything and now prepping that fact.

tee, hee.

[Thread]

He shouldn't have misled Pence. There was no reason to.

So what? Obama lied and lived to tell. Biden lied and lived to tell. That Blumenthal guy lied and lived to tell. A. Flynn should never have been fired. B. I'd fire McMaster's ass and bring back Flynn.

[TheSanityAnnex]

836735882300276737

:lmao
"Attendees at the meeting included NBC’s Chuck Todd and Lester Holt, CNN’s Jake Tapper and Wolf Blitzer, Univision’s Maria Elena Salinas, and Telemundo’s Jose Diaz-Balart."

looking at the list of attendees I'm guessing it was a setup by Trump that worked as someone already leaked the details and he'll be able to call the media dishonest again.

[spurraider21]

It's FAKE NEWS. I ain't doin' FAKE NEWS. No way.
and then the pivot....

Fake news?


I wish.
lol

Thread, this is why I'm not buying your "if he kneels on immigration, I'm done with him" talk. You'll pivot.

[Winehole23]

lol bitching about Benghazi investigations while you just make shit up about Trump/Russiayou've not been paying attention, as usual. My repeatedly given take on the the Putin-Trump nexus alleged by Dems is that it's McCarthyite bullshit and the evidence for coordination between Russian hackers and the Trump campaign isn't even paper thin, it's pure conjecture.

You should try reading my posts sometime. They give a a good idea of what I think about sruff.

[Winehole23]

My take isn't that Trump is the Manchurian Candidate. It's that he's a self serving crook. The evidence for this so far is purely circumstantial -- spidey sense tingling, so to speak.

[Winehole23]

Btw, what do you think I made up about Trump and Russia? I have no idea what you' re talking about, SnakeBoy

[TheSanityAnnex]

My take isn't that Trump is the Manchurian Candidate. It's that he's a self serving crook. The evidence for this so far is purely circumstantial -- spidey sense tingling, so to speak.
We disagree on a lot but I do appreciate your honesty. I'm sure you'd be calling Hillary a crook too had she won.