Log in

View Full Version : Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions



Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 [59] 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211

djohn2oo8
12-01-2017, 10:01 PM
You've no credibility.

Seems you're still grey.

djohn2oo8
12-01-2017, 10:03 PM
Keep pretending you know FBI standards

Keep pretending you know a wiretap works. Or that Susan Rice will be indicted. Or Hillary going to jail. Or Pizza gate a thing. Or no FISA warrants. or no indictments. Or Flynn not in trouble.

TSA
12-01-2017, 10:05 PM
936771920246087680
:lol even Fox news

Yeah. lol gotta love them criticizing Napolitano and then using Napolitano as a source.

djohn2oo8
12-01-2017, 10:06 PM
Yeah. lol gotta love them criticizing Napolitano and then using Napolitano as a source.

You were wrong. Take the loss. Again.

TSA
12-01-2017, 10:07 PM
Keep pretending you know a wiretap works. Or that Susan Rice will be indicted. Or Hillary going to jail. Or Pizza gate a thing. Or no FISA warrants. or no indictments. Or Flynn not in trouble.

:lol triggered

Relax djohn. My question were simple for an expert like you.

What level number is the “standard” offense? Is it level 6?

TSA
12-01-2017, 10:08 PM
You were wrong. Take the loss. Again.

Are you going to take me up on the $1000 Van Jones bet?

djohn2oo8
12-01-2017, 10:09 PM
Are you going to take me up on the $1000 Van Jones bet?

Sure. If you can tell me first when Susan Rice will be indicted.

djohn2oo8
12-01-2017, 10:10 PM
:lol triggered

Relax djohn. My question were simple for an expert like you.

What level number is the “standard” offense? Is it level 6?

:lol ignoring that you were wrong on all of those.

TSA
12-01-2017, 10:19 PM
Sure. If you can tell me first when Susan Rice will be indicted.

She will be indicted May 2nd 2018. Are you going to take me up on the $1000 Van Jones bet yes or no?

TSA
12-01-2017, 10:21 PM
:lol ignoring that you were wrong on all of those.

:lol ddodge2oo8

djohn2oo8
12-01-2017, 10:22 PM
She will be indicted May 2nd 2018.
:lol

djohn2oo8
12-01-2017, 10:26 PM
936671366786449409
Susan cleared. Not Flynn :lmao

TSA
12-01-2017, 10:31 PM
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/362856-cnn-white-house-claims-obama-admin-approved-flynn-calls-with-russian?amp

Flynn is going to sink them all. Obama sent him packing and he knows everything. His testimony will be fantastic.

DMX7
12-01-2017, 10:33 PM
936671366786449409
Susan cleared. Not Flynn :lmao

Your citing fake news NBC. We need "real" news from infowars, but only after we've completed checkout for a $999 water filter. :lol

FuzzyLumpkins
12-01-2017, 10:40 PM
I'll take the understanding of a former assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York over yours any day.


"Understand: If Flynn’s conversations with the Russian ambassador had evinced the existence of a quid pro quo collusion arrangement — that the Trump administration would ease or eliminate sanctions on Russia as a payback for Russia’s cyber-espionage against the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic party — it would have been completely appropriate, even urgently necessary, for the Obama Justice Department to investigate Flynn. But if that had happened, Mueller would not be permitting Flynn to settle the case with a single count of lying to FBI agents. Instead, we would be looking at a major conspiracy indictment, and Flynn would be made to plead to far more serious offenses if he wanted a deal — cooperation in exchange for sentencing leniency."
-Andrew C. McCarthy III

No legal basis for said claim. Only says it was "appropriate."

There is no requirement legal or otherwise for what you or he claims. Meanwhile, there are several reports of him testifying for collusion in Trump campaign.

DarrinS
12-01-2017, 10:42 PM
I’m having flashbacks of Hiraldo opening Capone’s vault.

TSA
12-01-2017, 10:42 PM
No legal basis for said claim. Only says it was "appropriate."

There is no requirement legal or otherwise for what you or he claims. Meanwhile, there are several reports of him testifying for collusion in Trump campaign.

Link please :rollin

FuzzyLumpkins
12-01-2017, 10:50 PM
Asha Rangappa, associate dean at Yale Law School.:

As for Trump, his knowledge of Flynn’s contacts with Russia (and other potentially illegal acts to which Flynn did not plead guilty) could not only tie him to the collusion case taking clearer shape, but also to the obstruction of justice case against the president specifically. After all, Trump’s main goal, starting with his initial meetings with former FBI Director James Comey, was to have the case against Flynn dropped. If Trump was knowingly trying to keep the FBI from discovering Flynn’s activities, that would seal the deal for Mueller’s obstruction case. For both collusion and obstruction, Flynn holds the key to who knew what when, and Mueller now has his cooperation.

Orin Kerr, professor of law, The George Washington University

Flynn’s plea brings the investigation much closer to the question of cooperation between the Russian government and the Trump campaign. We now know that there was a working relationship between the Trump transition and the Russian government in December 2016, just a month after the election. That raises the question: When did that working relationship start? And what was the scope of their cooperation? The person who knows that best may be Michael Flynn. And he’s now cooperating with the special counsel. That’s big.

Laurie Levenson, professor at Loyola Law School

Undoubtedly, Flynn’s plea is not the end of the road for this investigation. Rather, it is an opportunity to use Flynn’s status as an insider to explore who else close to the president participated in conversations with the Russians and the motivations for those conversations. Was there a deal to ease sanctions in exchange for Russians helping Trump get elected? Have others lied about their contacts (or lack of contacts) with foreign officials? We honestly don’t know how far this will go. However, given the lies and cover-up, there is still a lot of motivation for Mueller and his team to aggressively pursue all leads.

Richard Painter, professor of law at the University of Minnesota and former chief White House ethics lawyer under George W. Bush

Prosecutors don’t generally offer plea deals as generous as this one unless the defendant offers valuable information implicating someone higher up in the conspiracy than the defendant. Given that Flynn was very high up in the Trump campaign and in the White House, that means his testimony is likely to implicate someone of great importance. Mueller’s objective is to get that testimony in the record, and finish getting testimony from other witnesses, so that other indictments can be filed.

Alex Whiting, professor at Harvard Law School focusing on domestic and international criminal prosecution issues, and a former federal prosecutor

First, Flynn admits that when he spoke with Russian Ambassador Kislyak in December 2016, in violation of the Logan Act, about sanctions imposed on Russia and a vote concerning Israeli settlements, he did so under the direction of senior Trump transition team officials. It is difficult to believe that both Trump and Pence were unaware of Flynn’s interventions with the Russians. Second, it seems that Flynn got a very good deal today, indicating that he is offering extremely important information as part of his cooperation.
Of course, if Flynn fails to fulfill his end of the bargain and does not provide full cooperation, Mueller can tear up the agreement and charge him with all available crimes. But the fact that Mueller agreed to just one charge with a low penalty indicates that Flynn has a lot to offer.

David Sklansky, professor at Stanford Law School

This is a major development. Flynn has now admitted that he had direct conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak about American sanctions, and about an important United Nations vote, in the closing weeks of the Obama administration, and that he then lied about those conversations when he was interviewed by the FBI. Moreover, the statement of facts that Mueller’s office filed in court in support of Flynn’s guilty plea makes clear that Flynn wasn’t flying solo: He kept other senior members of Trump transition team in the loop about his conversations with Kislyak, and some of those contacts were actually directed by someone the pleading describes as a “very senior member” of the Trump transition team.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-01-2017, 10:51 PM
Link please :rollin

They have been linked in the thread. I am not going to cater to your poor reading skills, dimwit.

Chris
12-01-2017, 10:54 PM
Susan Rice dindunuffin' :lol

DMX7
12-01-2017, 11:02 PM
If Michael Flynn has turned on Trump, it's O-V-E-R from Trump. He's done, kaput, finished... May as well impeach now.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-01-2017, 11:04 PM
936626652284620800

Damn. How about that.


936628800837836800

Obama President, not Trump


LOL try harder.

936647274339414017

That's what collusion looks like on paper.


936684213515976704
lol

DarrinS
12-01-2017, 11:06 PM
This sounds like many of you today. :lmao



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJUtRGrvkqM

FuzzyLumpkins
12-01-2017, 11:09 PM
DarrinS again with nothing to add but youtubes and throwaway lines.

DarrinS
12-01-2017, 11:24 PM
DarrinS again with nothing to add but youtubes and throwaway lines.

Rent

TSA
12-01-2017, 11:29 PM
They have been linked in the thread. I am not going to cater to your poor reading skills, dimwit.

:lol not going to cater
:lol ok I’ll cater
:lol transition team norms
:lol election collusion
:lol ignore feature
:lol view post feature
:lol total ignore feature

FuzzyLumpkins
12-01-2017, 11:29 PM
Trump people have been cooperative, for the most part. Fusion GPS, Crowdstrike, and Platte River Networks? Not so much.


US media hysteria over Russia -- exactly what Putin wants.


MSM has been obsessed with Russia for months. Better not come up empty.


Lol, McCarthyism

Go for it


Get on with the investigation already. Let's see what they find.


Where's the beef?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlzQhA16KrI


A lot of people are going to have egg on their faces when this is all said and done. MSM will take another hit to their credibility.


These people have a diamond-cutting boner to take down the orange Manchuria candidate. If there was something there, it already would've been played.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pjo16QamjIc


I see the hunt for Red October is still going on. :lol

TSA
12-01-2017, 11:33 PM
Asha Rangappa, associate dean at Yale Law School.:

As for Trump, his knowledge of Flynn’s contacts with Russia (and other potentially illegal acts to which Flynn did not plead guilty) could not only tie him to the collusion case taking clearer shape, but also to the obstruction of justice case against the president specifically. After all, Trump’s main goal, starting with his initial meetings with former FBI Director James Comey, was to have the case against Flynn dropped. If Trump was knowingly trying to keep the FBI from discovering Flynn’s activities, that would seal the deal for Mueller’s obstruction case. For both collusion and obstruction, Flynn holds the key to who knew what when, and Mueller now has his cooperation.

Orin Kerr, professor of law, The George Washington University

Flynn’s plea brings the investigation much closer to the question of cooperation between the Russian government and the Trump campaign. We now know that there was a working relationship between the Trump transition and the Russian government in December 2016, just a month after the election. That raises the question: When did that working relationship start? And what was the scope of their cooperation? The person who knows that best may be Michael Flynn. And he’s now cooperating with the special counsel. That’s big.

Laurie Levenson, professor at Loyola Law School

Undoubtedly, Flynn’s plea is not the end of the road for this investigation. Rather, it is an opportunity to use Flynn’s status as an insider to explore who else close to the president participated in conversations with the Russians and the motivations for those conversations. Was there a deal to ease sanctions in exchange for Russians helping Trump get elected? Have others lied about their contacts (or lack of contacts) with foreign officials? We honestly don’t know how far this will go. However, given the lies and cover-up, there is still a lot of motivation for Mueller and his team to aggressively pursue all leads.

Richard Painter, professor of law at the University of Minnesota and former chief White House ethics lawyer under George W. Bush

Prosecutors don’t generally offer plea deals as generous as this one unless the defendant offers valuable information implicating someone higher up in the conspiracy than the defendant. Given that Flynn was very high up in the Trump campaign and in the White House, that means his testimony is likely to implicate someone of great importance. Mueller’s objective is to get that testimony in the record, and finish getting testimony from other witnesses, so that other indictments can be filed.

Alex Whiting, professor at Harvard Law School focusing on domestic and international criminal prosecution issues, and a former federal prosecutor

First, Flynn admits that when he spoke with Russian Ambassador Kislyak in December 2016, in violation of the Logan Act, about sanctions imposed on Russia and a vote concerning Israeli settlements, he did so under the direction of senior Trump transition team officials. It is difficult to believe that both Trump and Pence were unaware of Flynn’s interventions with the Russians. Second, it seems that Flynn got a very good deal today, indicating that he is offering extremely important information as part of his cooperation.
Of course, if Flynn fails to fulfill his end of the bargain and does not provide full cooperation, Mueller can tear up the agreement and charge him with all available crimes. But the fact that Mueller agreed to just one charge with a low penalty indicates that Flynn has a lot to offer.

David Sklansky, professor at Stanford Law School

This is a major development. Flynn has now admitted that he had direct conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak about American sanctions, and about an important United Nations vote, in the closing weeks of the Obama administration, and that he then lied about those conversations when he was interviewed by the FBI. Moreover, the statement of facts that Mueller’s office filed in court in support of Flynn’s guilty plea makes clear that Flynn wasn’t flying solo: He kept other senior members of Trump transition team in the loop about his conversations with Kislyak, and some of those contacts were actually directed by someone the pleading describes as a “very senior member” of the Trump transition team.

Flynn’s testimony will be devastating in ways you haven’t imagined
+++
Godspeed

FuzzyLumpkins
12-01-2017, 11:41 PM
Flynn’s testimony will be devastating in ways you haven’t imagined
+++
Godspeed

As opposed to Flynn's testimony is small potatoes?

All of them rebut your National Review guy that the deal is too small to be proof of anything significant. Oh and of course when googling your quote the top of the list is NR and 4chan.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-01-2017, 11:42 PM
Rent

you were posting in the thread and I responded. What you quoted was talking about your posts, dumbass.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-01-2017, 11:56 PM
If Mueller were prepared to settle the Flynn matter on the basis of single-count plea to a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001, he was almost certainly prepared to charge a great deal more. Moreover, we can infer from the fact that Flynn accepted the plea deal that he and his counsel were concerned about the degree of jeopardy, both for Flynn and for his son, related to other charges. The deal, in other words, reflects the strength of Mueller’s hand against Flynn.

It reflects something else too: that Flynn is prepared to give Mueller substantial assistance in his investigation and that Mueller wants the assistance Flynn can provide. We are not going to speculate about what that assistance might be. But prosecutors do not give generous deals in major public integrity cases to big-fish defendants without good reason—and in normal circumstances, the national security adviser to the president is a very big fish for a prosecutor. The good reason in this case necessarily involves the testimony Flynn has proffered to the special counsel’s staff. The information in that proffer is not in any of the documents released Friday, and it may not even be related to the information in those documents. Prosecutors tend to trade up. That is, for Mueller to give Flynn a deal of this sort, the prosecutor must believe he is building a case against a bigger fish still.

There’s another peculiar nuance: Section 3 of the plea agreement leaves Flynn unprotected against certain future prosecutions. The section is titled “Additional Charges” and states in its entirety that “In consideration of your client’s guilty plea to the above offense, your client will not be further prosecuted criminally by this Office for the conduct set forth in the attached Statement of the Offense” (emphasis ours). The office, in other words, seems to be reserving the right to prosecute Flynn for conduct not set forth in that document, which is to say all of the other conduct on which he might be vulnerable. It is hard to know what to make of this language. It could mean nothing at all. It could mean that the threat of further prosecution is being held over Flynn’s head if he does not hold up his end of the bargain. It could mean that another plea agreement covering other matters is coming.

........

The most important revelation here is that contrary to Cobb’s statement Friday morning, Flynn is saying clearly that he was not a rogue actor but was operating at the behest of the presidential transition team. He states that a “very senior member of the Presidential Transition Team,” a “senior official of the Presidential Transition Team” and “senior members of the Presidential Transition Team” were involved in directing his actions. The stipulated facts also make clear that Flynn reported back to the transition on his conversations with Kislyak.

Second, take a moment to remember the context in which Flynn’s underlying conduct took place: He and apparently the Trump transition team were working to undermine U.S. foreign policy goals endorsed by both parties. In December 2016, President Obama authorized sanctions against Russia in response to cyber-enabled election interference. He did so with broad bipartisan support to deter such activity in the future against the U.S. and its allies. The shared bipartisan—even nonpartisan—goal was to protect foundational elements of democracy and legitimacy. To the extent that there was mainstream criticism of the action, it was for being too weak, not for being too aggressive with respect to Russia.

https://lawfareblog.com/flynn-plea-quick-and-dirty-analysis

Susan Hennessey is the Executive Editor of Lawfare and General Counsel of the Lawfare Institute. She is a Brookings Fellow in National Security Law. Prior to joining Brookings, Ms. Hennessey was an attorney in the Office of General Counsel of the National Security Agency. She is a graduate of Harvard Law School and the University of California, Los Angeles.

boutons_deux
12-02-2017, 12:56 AM
James Clapper Destroys Trump’s New Blame Obama Excuse For Mike Flynn’s Russia CrimesThe White House came up with a new blame Obama excuse by telling CNN,

“None of the conversations were improper and were authorized by the Obama administration.”

Clapper said,

“That’s absurd.

That’s absolutely absurd.

There was great concern at the time, not just with this particular contact, but with the violation of the principle that historically been followed of one president,

one administration at a time, and

that gave rise to because of all these contacts that Mike was having and others in the transition with the Russians and other foreign entities is what is this,

what is this all about?

So to say that we blessed it, or acquiesced it is a stretch.”

http://www.politicususa.com/2017/12/01/james-clapper-destroys-trumps-blame-obama-excuse-mike-flynns-russia-crimes.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29

Chris
12-02-2017, 03:03 AM
Oh Danny boy!

https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/24129870_1026505107490199_4046365453755482682_n.pn g?oh=f8e0827f144b1bb0d13117ca6cddf7e0&oe=5AD6520D

Chris
12-02-2017, 03:27 AM
>Flynn admits he got confused and inadvertently lied to the FBI
>Trump fires Flynn for lying to the FBI
>Flynn pleads guilty to lying to the FBI
>this is somehow Trump's fault and very bad for him

https://media3.giphy.com/media/3oEjHAUOqG3lSS0f1C/giphy.gif

Pavlov
12-02-2017, 03:50 AM
:lol Chris never knows what he's talking about.

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 08:10 AM
:lol Chris never knows what he's talking about.

:lol

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 08:40 AM
Kind of an important detail, no?


936746822688739329

boutons_deux
12-02-2017, 09:01 AM
Kushner, former Trump adviser KT McFarland spoke with Flynn about Russia contacts

President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and former adviser K.T. McFarland were the Trump transition officials who spoke to former U.S. national security adviser Michael Flynn about his contacts with Russian officials, CNN reported Friday.

McFarland went on to serve in the Trump White House and has been nominated to be the U.S. ambassador to Singapore.

CNN also reported she met with investigators for special counsel Robert Mueller

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/kushner-former-trump-adviser-kt-mcfarland-spoke-with-flynn-about-russia-contacts-cnn/

Reck
12-02-2017, 09:22 AM
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/362856-cnn-white-house-claims-obama-admin-approved-flynn-calls-with-russian?amp

Flynn is going to sink them all. Obama sent him packing and he knows everything. His testimony will be fantastic.

Damn, son. This is a stretch even for you.

We're going beyond calling Flynn an "Obama official" even though he got canned in 2014 and Trump was specifically warned by Obama himself not to hire him.

But go ahead, one more absurd prediction from you is not going to make a bit of difference at this point.

Reck
12-02-2017, 09:25 AM
Kind of an important detail, no?


936746822688739329

Or you know, the "confidant" freaked after telling the truth and its just now simply backtracking.

But I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and go with his new story. Doesn't change the fact Flynn is already on the hook and has already made his deal. He knows who is next in the barrel.

boutons_deux
12-02-2017, 09:26 AM
Pence Asks Jesus to Rapture Him Up Before Mueller Can Indict Him

https://media.newyorker.com/photos/5a21d02ed28ae934e73c7188/master/w_649,c_limit/Borowitz-Pence-Asks-Jesus-to-Rapture-Him-Up-Before-Mueller-Can-Indict-Him.jpg


WASHINGTON — Vice-President Mike Pence has requested that Jesus Christ rapture him up before the special counsel Robert Mueller can indict him, a source close to Pence confirmed on Friday.

Shortly after the former national-security adviser Michael Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the F.B.I.,

Pence contacted Jesus to discuss the early rapture proposal, the source said.

The source characterized

Pence’s request to be raptured up as “urgent”

but did not indicate whether the Vice-President asked Jesus to rapture up any other senior Administration officials.

“Some of these people will have to be left behind, for obvious reasons,” the source said. “Jared, for example.”

After the news of Pence’s conversation with Jesus leaked to the press, the Vice-President released an official statement, intended to tamp down speculation about his rapture request.

“I had a good conversation with Jesus Christ earlier in the day,” the statement read.

“We touched on the timetable of my rapturing-up, along with a broad range of other issues.

That is all I have to say at the present time.”

https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/pence-asks-jesus-to-rapture-him-up-before-mueller-can-indict-him (https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/pence-asks-jesus-to-rapture-him-up-before-mueller-can-indict-him)

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 09:33 AM
Or you know, the "confidant" freaked after telling the truth and its just now simply backtracking.

But I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and go with his new story. Doesn't change the fact Flynn is already on the hook and has already made his deal. He knows who is next in the barrel.


It only changes the entire story. :lol

Reck
12-02-2017, 09:36 AM
It only changes the entire story. :lol

It does? In what way?

The FBI and Flynn coordinated a public stunt? :lol trumpie logic

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 09:37 AM
It does? In what way?

The FBI and Flynn coordinated a public stunt? :lol trumpie logic


https://www.mediaite.com/online/abc-news-slammed-for-hours-later-clarification-on-major-flynn-report-huge-effing-difference/

ducks
12-02-2017, 09:40 AM
http://money.cnn.com/2017/12/01/media/abc-news-flynn-correction/index.html

Abc correct their mistake that was really not a mistake on their part

Reck
12-02-2017, 09:40 AM
https://www.mediaite.com/online/abc-news-slammed-for-hours-later-clarification-on-major-flynn-report-huge-effing-difference/

I fail to see how this makes any difference in the course of the actual investigation. The story had an effect on the market. But guess what? The market fluctuates up and down.

Flynn still pleaded guilty and has flipped. That's not changing.

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 09:42 AM
http://money.cnn.com/2017/12/01/media/abc-news-flynn-correction/index.html

Abc correct their mistake that was really not a mistake on their part


Lol

“This is not the first high-profile mistake by Ross. In a 2012 piece for which he apologized, he suggested that the Aurora shooter may have had a connection to the Tea Party.”

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 09:43 AM
I fail to see how this makes any difference in the course of the actual investigation. The story had an effect on the market. But guess what? The market fluctuates up and down.

Flynn still pleaded guilty and has flipped. That's not changing.



I can see that you don’t understand the significance. That’s ok.

Reck
12-02-2017, 09:44 AM
I can see that you don’t understand the significance. That’s ok.

You still haven't said how this changes the investigation in which Flynn is already working for Mueller.

Go ahead. You have an entire day to explain.

Reck
12-02-2017, 09:47 AM
936727125515816960

But remember dat market tho.

Pavlov
12-02-2017, 09:48 AM
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/362856-cnn-white-house-claims-obama-admin-approved-flynn-calls-with-russian?amp

Flynn is going to sink them all. Obama sent him packing and he knows everything. His testimony will be fantastic.

You realize you do this every time also, don't you? It's pretty funny.

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 10:04 AM
You still haven't said how this changes the investigation in which Flynn is already working for Mueller.

Go ahead. You have an entire day to explain.


What is he going to testify to -- that Trump told him to do his job as incoming NSA? :lol


You DO realize that Flynn had no reason to lie about these meetings, right?

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 10:06 AM
Lol, ABC deletes original Ross' original report.


https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/12/01/abcs_brian_ross_flynn_prepared_to_testify_against_ trump_trump_family_people_in_the_white_house.html

Reck
12-02-2017, 10:08 AM
What is he going to testify to -- that Trump told him to do his job as incoming NSA? :lol


You DO realize that Flynn had no reason to lie about these meetings, right?

Hey man, you're entitled to wallow in Trump's own delusions. What an awesome country we live in, eh?

Enjoy it.

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 10:08 AM
What is he going to testify to -- that Trump told him to do his job as incoming NSA? :lol


You DO realize that Flynn had no reason to lie about these meetings, right?

I'll play along dipshit. Flynn will testify that he was told to discuss sanctions with Russia while the previous administration who implemented the sanctions were still in office. Why did Flynn lie to the public about that in February ?

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 10:11 AM
I'll play along dipshit. Flynn will testify that he was told to discuss sanctions with Russia while the previous administration who implemented the sanctions were still in office. Why did Flynn lie to the public about that in February ?


So?

And I don't know why he lied about it. I guess we'll find out.

Reck
12-02-2017, 10:15 AM
I'll play along dipshit. Flynn will testify that he was told to discuss sanctions with Russia while the previous administration who implemented the sanctions were still in office. Why did Flynn lie to the public about that in February ?

Trumpies have to live in an ultimate reality to go on living.

This never ends well.

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 10:18 AM
Trumpies have to live in an ultimate reality to go on living.

This never ends well.


I think you meant alternative reality. And that’s pretty much what you guys were living yesterday. :lol

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 10:21 AM
So?

And I don't know why he lied about it. I guess we'll find out.

What do you mean so? It was meant to undermine our government and against the law.

Reck
12-02-2017, 10:23 AM
I think you meant alternative reality. And that’s pretty much what you guys were living yesterday. :lol

Ultimate is about right.

Alternate reality cant handle the Trumpies at this point. Trump is basically your God.

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 10:25 AM
What do you mean so? It was meant to undermine our government and against the law.

And yet they’re only charging him with false statements.

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 10:27 AM
And yet they’re only charging him with false statements.

You really that dumb? Or did you miss the fact he made a plea deal for a lesser charge? Don't be that stupid again.

Reck
12-02-2017, 10:29 AM
And yet they’re only charging him with false statements.

As a starter.

You dont throw the guy the book all at once just to have Trump pardon him for everything.

Trump can pardon him now, but Mueller can bring up more serious charges and make that pardon moot.

Mueller is not some asshole who is going to get out think by Trump of all people.

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 10:35 AM
You really that dumb? Or did you miss the fact he made a plea deal for a lesser charge? Don't be that stupid again.


It seems he took the deal for financial reasons and possibly to protect his son. He and his son were involved in some bizarre plot to kidnap a Turkish dissident. Wtf?

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 10:36 AM
And he is ready to testify against Trump and his family.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-02-2017, 11:09 AM
It's amusing watching GOPotards use Flynn taking a lesser charge in a plea deal as mitigating evidence. What is the point of taking a plea deal if not to get a lesser charge?

The thing is to get a real sweet deal like Flynn did you have to have something that prosecutors really want and that a judge is going to agree is in the best interest of justice. I only posted over a half dozen federal attorneys discussing that dynamic last night.

Darrin is called a sophist piece of shit for a reason.

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 11:12 AM
It's amusing watching GOPotards use Flynn taking a lesser charge in a plea deal as mitigating evidence. What is the point of taking a plea deal if not to get a lesser charge?

The thing is to get a real sweet deal like Flynn did you have to have something that prosecutors really want and that a judge is going to agree is in the best interest of justice. I only posted over a half dozen federal attorneys discussing that dynamic last night.

Darrin is called a sophist piece of shit for a reason.

It is funny how they try and explain the dynamics when they said no charges would ever be filed anyway.

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 11:40 AM
“UPDATE: ABC News has deleted the above video of Ross' report from Friday morning after investigative reporter Brian Ross retracted the explosive claim that Flynn would be willing to testify against Trump.

Ross said on ABC World News Tonight that incoming President Trump, not candidate Trump, instructed Flynn to speak to the Russians, a chasm between the original report that the Republican nominee made the request.

Ross also clarified the reason why Flynn -- the incoming National Security Advisor -- was told to speak to the Russian Federation whereas before he left it open-ended that Trump wanted the retired general to "make contact" with the Russians.


Ross also revealed Flynn made the decision to plead guilty to making false statements to the government because of financial burdens that have forced him to put his house up for sale. ”


:lol

FuzzyLumpkins
12-02-2017, 11:48 AM
“UPDATE: ABC News has deleted the above video of Ross' report from Friday morning after investigative reporter Brian Ross retracted the explosive claim that Flynn would be willing to testify against Trump.

Ross said on ABC World News Tonight that incoming President Trump, not candidate Trump, instructed Flynn to speak to the Russians, a chasm between the original report that the Republican nominee made the request.

Ross also clarified the reason why Flynn -- the incoming National Security Advisor -- was told to speak to the Russian Federation whereas before he left it open-ended that Trump wanted the retired general to "make contact" with the Russians.


Ross also revealed Flynn made the decision to plead guilty to making false statements to the government because of financial burdens that have forced him to put his house up for sale. ”


:lol

That was not the only report and its obvious a source changed their story on that one. You are like a guy that gets dunked on all game and manages to tip a ball but it still goes in so you cheer like you accomplished something.

I actually like this. You are parroting GOP talking points again. This is where we get to shine a light on your stupidity.

Pavlov
12-02-2017, 12:13 PM
I'll just go by Darrin, Chris and especially TSA's record of predictions in this thread.

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/105/986/130014911356.gif

Reck
12-02-2017, 12:21 PM
That was not the only report and its obvious a source changed their story on that one. You are like a guy that gets dunked on all game and manages to tip a ball but it still goes in so you cheer like you accomplished something.

I actually like this. You are parroting GOP talking points again. This is where we get to shine a light on your stupidity.

This is why you need more than one source when you put shock news out.

All this anonymous source had to do was change his story to make ABC News look like amateurs. I bet the source did it on purpose too so Trump can claim fake news.

Reck
12-02-2017, 12:52 PM
Trump now admits he knew Flynn had lied. An he still kept him...then asked Comey to let him go.

937012899972759552

Trump is a blackhole.

florige
12-02-2017, 12:53 PM
This is why you need more than one source when you put shock news out.

All this anonymous source had to do was change his story to make ABC News look like amateurs. I bet the source did it on purpose too so Trump can claim fake news.


These major networks need to be more careful about these "sources". All it does is give Trump more ammunition at the end of the day.

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 12:54 PM
937008672353505281
CROFL hahahahah!!!!!

Pavlov
12-02-2017, 12:58 PM
No guys, Trump is totes a super genius. That tweet is just the bait needed to put away Obama for life.

boutons_deux
12-02-2017, 01:36 PM
It doesn't matter whether Flynn secretly talked to the Russians before or after the election.

And do you ignorant motherfuckers really believe Flynn, etc ILLEGALLY talked to the Russians only AFTER the election? :lol

Trash's team, from the election to 20 Jan, should have been in contact only with Obama's team, NOT dicking around making contact with Russians while Trash team was not in office, subverting the LEGAL President, if he was a Repug-hated knitter.

Reck
12-02-2017, 01:37 PM
No guys, Trump is totes a super genius. That tweet is just the bait needed to put away Obama for life.

Darrins was having a good time too. Aw shucks.

boutons_deux
12-02-2017, 01:41 PM
What does Michael Flynn’s plea deal mean for Trump? Here are 4 big questions.


1. What does Flynn even know?

the most significant thing about it is that it signals Flynn is cooperating. And it's likely his cooperation is far-reaching.

2. Why did Flynn lie?

Why did Flynn feel the need to misrepresent his conversations with the Russian ambassador?

were Flynn's lies merely the latest in a long volume of those close to Trump seeming to cover up the existence and substance of their contacts with Russia?

3. Who else, besides Jared Kushner, directed Flynn to talk to Russia?

Flynn contacted the Russian ambassador with the knowledge and at the direction of plenty of influential people.


. . . Court records and people familiar with the contacts indicated [Flynn] was acting in consultation with senior Trump transition officials, including President Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, in his dealings with the diplomat.Flynn’s plea revealed that he was in touch with senior Trump transition officials before and after his communications with the ambassador.



4. Why did Flynn direct Russia not to respond to U.S. sanctions?


on Dec. 29, Flynn called the ambassador to ask Russia not to escalate an ongoing feud over sanctions imposed by the Obama administration (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/obama-administration-announces-measures-to-punish-russia-for-2016-election-interference/2016/12/29/311db9d6-cdde-11e6-a87f-b917067331bb_story.html?utm_term=.c60b3dc98008), court records say. The ambassador later called back and said Russia had chosen not to retaliate,

did he indicate that the Trump administration might seek to ease those sanctions when it took over less than a month later?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/12/02/what-does-michael-flynns-plea-deal-mean-for-trump-here-are-4-big-questions/?undefined=&utm_term=.afbb929b7fb1&wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1

boutons_deux
12-02-2017, 01:44 PM
ignorant, entitled, privileged BITCH

Ivanka Trump pushed to put Flynn in office

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/ivanka-trump-pushed-to-put-flynn-in-office/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

boutons_deux
12-02-2017, 02:46 PM
Don't cry for Flynn

Michael Flynn will keep military rank and pension

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/michael-flynn-will-keep-military-rank-and-pension/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

boutons_deux
12-02-2017, 03:08 PM
Rachel Maddow: Flynn plea deal points the finger directly at Mike Pence involvement

Noting that Pence oversaw the Trump transition team, Maddow pointed that he likely was one of those who was aware that Flynn spoke withe the Russians about easing sanctions.

“Vice President Pence insisted publicly more than once that Mike Flynn never talked about sanctions with the Russians.

That was always a false statement,” Maddow began.

“Well, now we know that multiple members of the Trump transition team knew that was a false statement when Mike Pence said it.

So, why’d they let him say it?”

“Honestly, what we learned today also raises the question of whether or not Mike Pence knew that was a false statement when he said it,”

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/rachel-maddow-flynn-plea-deal-points-the-finger-directly-at-mike-pence-involvement/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 03:12 PM
937011097751703552

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 03:13 PM
937037469584969729

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 03:14 PM
937039988407062528

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 03:14 PM
937041206370033664

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 03:15 PM
937048734264897542

monosylab1k
12-02-2017, 03:48 PM
No guys, Trump is totes a super genius. That tweet is just the bait needed to put away Obama for life.

8-D Chess tbh fwiw imho

Chris
12-02-2017, 04:06 PM
>Flynn admits he got confused and inadvertently lied to the FBI
>Trump fires Flynn for lying to the FBI
>Flynn pleads guilty to lying to the FBI
>this is somehow Trump's fault and very bad for him

https://media3.giphy.com/media/3oEjHAUOqG3lSS0f1C/giphy.gif


:lol Chris never knows what he's talking about.


:lol

Donald J. Trump — President of the United States
3 hrs ·
I had to fire General Flynn because he lied to the Vice President and the FBI. He has pled guilty to those lies. It is a shame because his actions during the transition were lawful. There was nothing to hide!


(Boy you're dumb :lol)

Chris
12-02-2017, 04:07 PM
https://media3.giphy.com/media/3oEjHAUOqG3lSS0f1C/giphy.gif
https://media3.giphy.com/media/3oEjHAUOqG3lSS0f1C/giphy.gif
https://media3.giphy.com/media/3oEjHAUOqG3lSS0f1C/giphy.gif

Chris
12-02-2017, 04:09 PM
b4Qwun8vmac

:lmao :lmao :lmao

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 04:12 PM
937066096074657792 Reck

clambake
12-02-2017, 04:14 PM
emails all good now.

Chris
12-02-2017, 04:16 PM
"But his emails!"

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 04:24 PM
937067295754670080 Reck monosylab1k

Chris
12-02-2017, 04:26 PM
Kyle Griffin doesn't know whether he's coming or going :lol

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 04:40 PM
Kyle Griffin doesn't know whether he's coming or going :lol

Chris, why were Trump's advisers writing and forwarding emails that said Russia threw them the election?

boutons_deux
12-02-2017, 04:41 PM
Trump appears to have just admitted to a serious crime on Twitter

This is a brand new version of events from the White House. And it could land the president in very hot water.

Donald J. Trump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)
(https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)✔@realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)

I had to fire General Flynn because he lied to the Vice President and the FBI.

He has pled guilty to those lies.

It is a shame because his actions during the transition were lawful.

There was nothing to hide!

11:14 AM - Dec 2, 2017 (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/937007006526959618)


This is a brand new version of events. Until now, the White House has claimed that Trump fired Flynn just because he lied to Pence.

According to Trump’s own tweet,

he would have known Flynn had lied to the FBI

at the time Trump asked former FBI Director James Comey to drop the investigation into Flynn,

assuring him Flynn had done nothing wrong.

On Twitter, Matthew Miller, a former Department of Justice official, echoes that Trump’s new version of events indicates an effort to obstruct Comey’s investigation.

Matthew Miller (https://twitter.com/matthewamiller)
(https://twitter.com/matthewamiller)✔@matthewamiller (https://twitter.com/matthewamiller)

Oh my god,

he just admitted to obstruction of justice.

If Trump knew Flynn lied to the FBI when he asked Comey to let it go,

then there is your case.

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/937007006526959618 … (https://t.co/c6Wtd0TfzW)

11:24 AM - Dec 2, 2017 (https://twitter.com/matthewamiller/status/937009631662104578)

Flynn resigned from his post Feb. 13 and Comey testified before Senate Intelligence Committee that in a Feb. 14 meeting in the White House — just a day after Flynn had left — Trump asked him to drop the investigation.

“I hope you can let this go,” Trump said to Comey, according to Comey’s memo on the conversation.

According to that same memo, Trump specifically told Comey in that conversation that Flynn had done nothing wrong. If today’s tweet is true, he then lied to Comey to get him to drop an investigation, knowing full well Flynn had lied to the FBI.

The White House has denied Comey’s version of events, but an FBI agent’s contemporaneous notes about events or conversations are often held up as evidence in court.

https://thinkprogress.org/trump-twitter-obstruction-justice-2af99c5629f6/

Chris
12-02-2017, 04:43 PM
"Oh my god,

he just admitted to obstruction of justice."

:lmao

Crawl MF'er Crawl!

Chris
12-02-2017, 04:44 PM
Chris, why were Trump's advisers writing and forwarding emails that said Russia threw them the election?

Putin pulling all the strings clearly.

boutons_deux
12-02-2017, 05:09 PM
Legal analyst Jeff Toobin destroys Trump lawyer’s claim that no crime was committed

“I’m not concerned about these bizarre theories,” Sekulow told Toobin. “There is no basis for saying, under the law or the facts, that any of this behavior during the campaign was criminal.”

Other experts disagree with Sekulow’s conclusion.

“Foreigners can’t contribute to federal, state, or local campaigns, and that doesn’t just cover cash contributions,”

Kathleen Clark, a professor at the law school of Washington University in St. Louis, explained.

“According to the statute, if a campaign solicits a foreigner to give a ‘thing of value’ to a political campaign, that would be illegal as well.”

The hacking of the DNC could also provide Trump associates with legal exposure under the 1986 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

“If there is an agreement to commit hacking,

it doesn’t matter if the people in the Trump campaign didn’t do the actual hacking—

it just matters that they knew someone else would do it.

There just needs to be an agreement that one or more will do it,”

Orin Kerr, a professor at George Washington University Law School and computer law expert noted.

“They just need to have encouraged the hacking.”

A recent Supreme Court decision, Rosemond v. United States, expanded the definition of aiding and abetting to include assistance after the crime has been committed.

Toobin suggests that obstruction of justice will be easier for special counsel Robert Mueller to prove.

“Unlike ‘collusion,’ the crime of obstruction of justice is well established and easy to understand,”

Toobin noted.

“The issue is at the heart of Mueller’s mandate because a possible obstruction of justice—the President’s decision to fire James Comey—gave rise to the creation of the special-counsel position in the first place.

The crucial issue in the Comey firing is whether the President had a corrupt motive for the dismissal.”

“Trump’s financial affairs, especially with regard to Russia, remain opaque, but it’s possible to imagine how they might give rise to an impeachable offense.

A straight payoff to Trump—cash in return for, say, a relaxation of the sanctions imposed by President Obama on the Putin regime—would certainly be impeachable even if it were not technically a crime under American law.

Trump’s known business dealings suggest the possibility of a quid pro quo with Russian interests,”

“In 2015, for example, Trump signed a ‘letter of intent’ to build a tower in Moscow. Felix Sater, a Russian associate of Trump’s, wrote of the project, in an e-mail to Trump’s attorney Michael Cohen,

‘Our boy can become president of the USA and we can engineer it. . . . I will get all of Putins team to buy in on this, I will manage this process.’

That deal never came to fruition, but the intent expressed on both sides is deeply troubling.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/legal-analyst-jeff-toobin-destroys-trump-lawyers-claim-that-no-crime-was-committed/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

“They just need to have encouraged the hacking.” :lol

“I will tell you this, Russia: If you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,”

the Republican nominee said at a news conference in Florida.

“I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”




Trump’s comments

Chris
12-02-2017, 05:12 PM
Robert Mueller’s special counsel operation seems more interested in the alleged foreign ties of the Trump Team, rather than the corrupt activities of Hillary Clinton’s associates. Judicial Watch aims to figure out the truth of what exactly the Podesta Group was doing with the Obama State Department. Learn about our new lawsuit here:https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-sues-state-department-podesta-group-records/

https://scontent-sjc2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/24130001_10155515893051943_1556511488811652857_n.j pg?oh=6f05ab7a56aac8d43ce5c5145d65e2ae&oe=5A9BB893

:ihit:ihit:ihit

Reck
12-02-2017, 05:27 PM
Chris, are you Ok?

Pavlov
12-02-2017, 05:39 PM
Donald J. Trump — President of the United States
3 hrs ·
I had to fire General Flynn because he lied to the Vice President and the FBI. He has pled guilty to those lies. It is a shame because his actions during the transition were lawful. There was nothing to hide!


(Boy you're dumb :lol)Chris doesn't realize what Trump just admitted to.

lol

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 05:42 PM
937069953521455104

Chris
12-02-2017, 05:54 PM
Chris, are you Ok?

Rather dapper thank you.

Chris
12-02-2017, 05:54 PM
Chris doesn't realize what Trump just admitted to.

lol

Is Trump in major trouble now too?

Pavlov
12-02-2017, 05:54 PM
Is Trump in major trouble now too?He's certainly acting like it.

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 06:13 PM
Is Trump in major trouble now too?

Yup.

Reck
12-02-2017, 06:21 PM
937066296138764292

Dude..:lol

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 06:58 PM
ABC suspends Brian Ross

http://money.cnn.com/2017/12/02/media/abc-news-brian-ross/index.html

Pavlov
12-02-2017, 07:00 PM
This is the most important thing that has ever happened to Darrin that didn't involve black people.

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 07:01 PM
This is the most important thing that has ever happened to Darrin that didn't involve black people.


How to tell when Chump is mad at me. :lol

Pavlov
12-02-2017, 07:02 PM
How to tell when Chump is mad at me. :lolI don't really care about Brian Ross, but it's REALLY important to you. :lol

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 07:05 PM
I don't really care about Brian Ross, but it's REALLY important to you. :lol

In so much as board libs shot their wad over fake news, only to realize they just slept with a tranny. :lmao

Pavlov
12-02-2017, 07:07 PM
In so much as board libs shot their wad over fake news, only to realize they just slept with a tranny. :lmaoThat's a pretty specific mixed metaphor fantasy you put out there.

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 07:07 PM
:lol

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=266387&p=9205190&viewfull=1#post9205190

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 07:14 PM
Poor Darrin. Spends all day trying to convince himself of fake news. Him and Chris sure spend alot more time around here these days over "fake news".

Reck
12-02-2017, 07:15 PM
For a non Trumpie, Darrins sure is a dependable soldier.

:cry for the blacks

Pavlov
12-02-2017, 07:16 PM
Darrin doesn't realize that Trump legally shit all over himself on twitter.

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 07:17 PM
Poor Darrin. Spends all day trying to convince himself of fake news. Him and Chris sure spend alot more time around here these days over "fake news".

CNN and others pointed out the fake news. :lol

Reck
12-02-2017, 07:17 PM
Darrin doesn't realize that Trump legally shit all over himself on twitter.

He knows.

He just doesn't want to face that reality.

Or the one about det emails.

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 07:21 PM
CNN and others pointed out the fake news. :lol

So you are saying Flynn hasn't been charged? Or Manafort? Or gates? Or Flynn isnt ready to testify against Trump? or are you saying Trump's own adviser didn't sent an email referencing Russia throwing the election for Trunp?

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 07:23 PM
So you are saying Flynn hasn't been charged? Or Manafort? Or gates? Or Flynn isnt ready to testify against Trump? or are you saying Trump's own adviser didn't sent an email referencing Russia throwing the election for Trunp?


Yes to bold part.

No to everything else.

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 07:24 PM
Yes to bold part.

No to everything else.

Flynn is actually ready to Testify.

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 07:25 PM
Flynn is actually ready to Testify.

Uh, ok.

Pavlov
12-02-2017, 07:26 PM
Flynn is actually ready to Testify.Most likely, but about what -- can't be sure.

Reck
12-02-2017, 07:27 PM
Yes to bold part.

No to everything else.

He's not ready to testify, then what is he good for?

Who do you think this is all for? Ivanka?

Ultimately Flynn will take the stand and point fingers. I will grant you some room as to who that person or persons will be. But if I were you, I wouldn't hold my breath on Trump skating.

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 07:27 PM
I think John must know Flynn personally.

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 07:27 PM
He's not ready to testify, then what is he good for?

Who do you think this is all for? Ivanka?

Ultimately Flynn will take the stand and point fingers. I will grant you some room as to who that person or persons will be. But if I were you, I wouldn't hold my breath on Trump skating.


Ok. Thanks for the advice.

Pavlov
12-02-2017, 07:28 PM
He's not ready to testify, then what is he good for?

Who do you think this is all for? Ivanka?Would totally be worth it to keep dad from groping her anymore.

Reck
12-02-2017, 07:29 PM
Ok. Thanks for the advice.

Just saying.

Your flag is firmly planted in the Trump camp. No "I was always impartial" card :cry

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 07:31 PM
Just saying.

Your flag is firmly planted in the Trump camp. No "I was always impartial" card :cry


My flag is firmly planted in “this Russian collusion narrative is retarded” camp.

monosylab1k
12-02-2017, 07:37 PM
Kyle Griffin doesn't know whether he's coming or going :lol

He knew Flynn was going down, which is more than your dumb ass has figured out. So why do you watch ESPN if Disney is the devil, Chris?

Will Hunting
12-02-2017, 07:38 PM
He knew Flynn was going down, which is more than your dumb ass has figured out. So why do you watch ESPN if Disney is the devil, Chris?
:cry his daddeh is watching and he can’t help it :cry

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 07:40 PM
I think John must know Flynn personally.

Flynn says he is cooperating. So does the fact he has a deal mean he does not want to testify?

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 07:41 PM
My flag is firmly planted in “this Russian collusion narrative is retarded” camp.

Trump's own people said Russia helped them. Christ.

monosylab1k
12-02-2017, 07:43 PM
:cry his daddeh is watching and he can’t help it :cry

“:cry but DADDEH don’t you know Disney is a devil worshipping corporation that used rape baby bood to write the screenplay for Toy Story 3????? It is too true, daddeh, you don’t even know! You’re just a globalist cuck!....... well soooorrryyyy Daddeh I didn’t mean it, please don’t take my Infowars subscription away!”

Reck
12-02-2017, 07:44 PM
My flag is firmly planted in “this Russian collusion narrative is retarded” camp.

Fair enough...oh wait.

884789418455953413


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnY7D4M4k68

936635014908907521

937070652732952577

:lol My flag is planted in the this russian collusion narrative is retarded camp. :lol
:lol Darrins

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 07:46 PM
Good luck, Reck.

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 07:46 PM
Fair enough...oh wait.

884789418455953413


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnY7D4M4k68

936635014908907521

937070652732952577

:lol My flag is planted in the this russian collusion narrative is retarded camp. :lol
:lol Darrins

:lol

Will Hunting
12-02-2017, 07:55 PM
“:cry but DADDEH don’t you know Disney is a devil worshipping corporation that used rape baby bood to write the screenplay for Toy Story 3????? It is too true, daddeh, you don’t even know! You’re just a globalist cuck!....... well soooorrryyyy Daddeh I didn’t mean it, please don’t take my Infowars subscription away!”

:lol

“Chris, why the fuck did you cancel my Netflix subscription?”

”:cry they made a show with a title about white people I didn’t like. We need to boycott dad :cry”

”Maybe focus more on obtaining gainful employment than boycotting random shit?”

dabom
12-02-2017, 07:57 PM
Can we drop this pudding lackey out the oval office already? :lol

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 07:58 PM
Can we drop this pudding lackey out the oval office already? :lol

That’s the fantasy, tbh.

dabom
12-02-2017, 07:59 PM
That’s the fantasy, tbh.

Darrin i bet you 100$ Trump gets impeached his first term in office.

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 07:59 PM
That’s the fantasy, tbh.

Its no fantasy Chris. Whoops, Darrin.

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 07:59 PM
Its no fantasy Chris. Whoops, Darrin.

Time will tell.

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 08:00 PM
Darrin i bet you 100$ Trump gets impeached his first term in office.

Ok. Don’t welch.

dabom
12-02-2017, 08:00 PM
Ok. Don’t welch.

Done.

dabom
12-02-2017, 08:03 PM
Gonna get some BBQ with that money. Thanks.

DarrinS
12-02-2017, 08:11 PM
Gonna get some BBQ with that money. Thanks.

That’s a lot of BBQ bro. Better share.

AaronY
12-02-2017, 08:16 PM
Good except more like this


:lol

“Chris, why the fuck did you cancel my Netflix subscription?”

”:cry tHeY mAdE a sHoW wItH a tItLe aBoUt wHiTe pEoPlE I dIdN't lIkE. wE nEeD tO bOyCoTt dAd
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DP1RAagWkAEDVKU?format=jpg&name=orig
:cry"
”Maybe focus more on obtaining gainful employment than boycotting random shit?”

Mikeanaro
12-02-2017, 08:48 PM
937096814267916294

FEIK NOOBS!

CosmicCowboy
12-02-2017, 08:54 PM
Darrin i bet you 100$ Trump gets impeached his first term in office.
Damn, I want some of that.

Spurminator
12-02-2017, 08:55 PM
Darrin i bet you 100$ Trump gets impeached his first term in office.

100$ ? Where are you from?

Reck
12-02-2017, 09:04 PM
937134251706896390

dabom
12-02-2017, 09:06 PM
Damn, I want some of that.


100$ ? Where are you from?

I got both of ya too. Just reply to me and it's good.

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 09:14 PM
937134251706896390

:lmao who the fuck is stupid enough to discuss that in an email

dabom
12-02-2017, 09:16 PM
Admitting Russia won the election for him. :lmao :lmao

Emails. :lmao :lmao

CosmicCowboy
12-02-2017, 09:17 PM
Impeached first term? I'm in.

dabom
12-02-2017, 09:28 PM
Impeached first term? I'm in.

:tu

boutons_deux
12-02-2017, 09:58 PM
Repug House will vote down impeachment just as Repug Senate will seat a pedophile

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 09:59 PM
937148918747615233
The dumb fuck just can't help himself :lol

Chris
12-02-2017, 10:02 PM
Trump wants blood. Hillary is on the docket :lol

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 10:04 PM
Trump wants blood. Hillary is on the docket :lol

Whose docket? Only members of Trump's campaign so far are on Mueller's docket.

djohn2oo8
12-02-2017, 10:06 PM
Also, :lol Chris staking out this thread after his boy admitted to obstructing justice.

koriwhat
12-02-2017, 10:08 PM
the soap opera for the ages

Spurminator
12-02-2017, 10:10 PM
I got both of ya too. Just reply to me and it's good.

I'm asking where you're from because of how you wrote 100$

Pavlov
12-02-2017, 10:13 PM
Trump wants blood. Hillary is on the docket :lol


Whose docket? Only members of Trump's campaign so far are on Mueller's docket.:lol Chris doesn't know what he's talking about.

Again.

dabom
12-02-2017, 10:28 PM
I'm asking where you're from because of how you wrote 100$

I'm typing what I think. I write $100 too.

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 07:25 AM
FAKE NEWS

No so fake. Crawl motherfucker, Crawl.

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 08:04 AM
Jesus Trump has not stopped tweeting about the FBI since yesterday and is melting down gloriously this morning.

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 08:40 AM
CROFL responding to himself on Twitter now

boutons_deux
12-03-2017, 09:00 AM
White House now blames Trump attorney John Dowd for bonkers ‘I had to fire General Flynn’ tweet

https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/John-Dowd.jpg

In what could appear to be an effort to shield President Donald Trump from the legal exposure

he may have incurred by tweeting about (https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/former-ethics-chief-trumps-saturday-morning-flynn-tweet-should-be-enough-to-end-his-presidency/) accusations against disgraced national security adviser Michael Flynn,

the White House is now claiming that attorney John Dowd authored the

ill-advised :lol :lol

social media message.

The Washington Post said (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/12/02/trumps-first-tweet-about-michael-flynns-guilty-plea-could-be-a-problem-for-him/?utm_term=.322cc62bde66) in an update added to their story about the Twitter message —

which insisted that any actions undertaken by Flynn during the presidential transition were “lawful” —

that Trump’s personal attorney Dowd posted in the first person on the president’s Twitter account.

“UPDATE: The Post is now reporting that the tweet was authored by Trump’s personal lawyer, John Dowd, according to two people familiar with the situation,” said a note added some time after the article was published at 4:30 p.m. Saturday.

“The fact that Dowd authored the tweet could limit its salience to the investigation, but the White House still hasn’t publicly corrected anything.”

Legal experts were aghast (https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/oh-my-god-he-just-admitted-to-obstruction-legal-experts-aghast-at-trumps-reckless-flynn-tweet/) on Saturday when the message was posted, questioning whether Trump was intentionally trying to get himself charged with obstruction of justice.

However, as some observers noted,

if Dowd actually authored the tweet in question, he used the improper conjugation of the verb “to plead”

— the kind of mistake a first-year law student learns not to make, let alone a seasoned attorney like Dowd.

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/white-house-now-blames-trump-attorney-john-dowd-for-bonkers-i-had-to-fire-general-flynn-tweet/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29 (https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/white-house-now-blames-trump-attorney-john-dowd-for-bonkers-i-had-to-fire-general-flynn-tweet/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29)

So other people are tweeting as @ RealDonaldTrump? :lol

The WH legal team, like 1000s of others Trash followers, realizes that Trash tweet-incriminated himself for obstruction of justice. :lol

boutons_deux
12-03-2017, 09:26 AM
Bombshell email reveals NRA link to attempted ‘back-channel meeting’ between Trump and Putin during campaign

A conservative operative reportedly worked to set up a “back-channel meeting” between then-candidate Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin during the 2016 campaign — and he planned to use a National Rifle Association convention to do it.

The New York Times reported (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/03/us/politics/trump-putin-russia-nra-campaign.html) on Sunday that it had obtained May 2016 email correspondence titled “Kremlin Connection” that was exchanged between conservative operative Paul Erickson and Trump campaign adviser Rick Dearborn.

According to the Times:

In it, the N.R.A. member said he wanted the advice of Mr. Dearborn and Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama, then a foreign policy adviser to Mr. Trump and Mr. Dearborn’s longtime boss, about how to proceed in connecting the two leaders.

Russia, he wrote, was “quietly but actively seeking a dialogue with the U.S.” and would attempt to use the N.R.A.’s annual convention in Louisville, Ky., to make “‘first contact.’”

The email, which was among a trove of campaign-related documents turned over to investigators on Capitol Hill, was described in detail to The New York Times.


In the email, NRA member Paul Erickson said that he wanted to get the advice of then-campaign adviser Jeff Sessions about a meeting between Trump and Putin.

“Putin is deadly serious about building a good relationship with Mr. Trump,”

NRA member Paul Erickson wrote in the email.

“He wants to extend an invitation to Mr. Trump to visit him in the Kremlin before the election.

Let’s talk through what has transpired and Senator Sessions’s :lol advice on how to proceed.”

The email was one of several overtures Russians made to the Trump campaign even before the GOP candidate had secured the nomination.

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/bombshell-email-reveals-nra-link-to-attempted-back-channel-meeting-between-trump-and-putin-during-campaign/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

florige
12-03-2017, 10:19 AM
Jesus Trump has not stopped tweeting about the FBI since yesterday and is melting down gloriously this morning.

Be careful now supposedly some othe me guy tweeted that tweet about Flynn not Trump. When will Trumptards get tanks dude is a habitual liar I wonder?

baseline bum
12-03-2017, 10:25 AM
Damn, I want some of that.

I think the odds are pretty decent he does in 2019 since the Democrats are slightly favored to take the house. If the Democrats take the house I can't see any way they don't impeach. Of course he'll never be convicted.

Reck
12-03-2017, 10:55 AM
937279001684598784

Say this under oath, Trump.

pgardn
12-03-2017, 10:57 AM
:lmao who the fuck is stupid enough to discuss that in an email

Actually she is regurgitating what some of you guys believe.

Interefernce = Collusion

This is where the Trump inability to let things go has again got him in trouble. So far the facts show interference as much more likely than collusion. For God's sake the Russians have basically stuck it in Obama's face as a parting shot, "we can do this, what are you going to do?" This lady knows this and she knows Trump. And to the Russians credit, they thought they might get Trump to deny the interference by doing what almost every US president has done since Putin has been in power, try to start out a new relationship (even though the Russians has basically admitted to interfering) The collusion idea is also very pleasing in some ways to the Russians.

So Trump has gone further than other US presidents, except he was not allowed. He was forced to sign a sanctions and threw some diplomats out. Then in another naive, juvenile way he had his administration reason with the Russians to not respond.



The bottom line is many "libtards, repugs, and Russians" don't want the US "policing the world"

This nebulous policing term extends to leaving Russia alone cause they really are not a problem. News flash, they are. They firmly believe strongmen and an abiding rich political class are much easier to deal with than democracy. So do we to some extent. The Russians want chaos outside of their own country, in specific locations at present. That way they can recreate a semblance of the old Soviet Union. This is really all they can hope for; A prideful outcome. because economically they, and their system, suck.

Which leads ads in to this aside:

Meanwhile "libtards and Trump's repulsive repug base" also have a shared goal economically. (Now taxes...)

An Economic break for lower to mid range wage earners. Meanwhile, "Oh look, the stock Market!" I get even more money in dividends most likely and at the same time have a paper wealth more than I ever dreamed of as a teenager. For doing nothing more than reinvesting? Really, really tough work on that end. White boy gets good education, is in the right field knowing the right people at the perfect time, works hard (but not in a backbreaking ditch) and can (but no desire, the opposite) retire way, way early? I cannot possibly give back in a monetary way what this country has allowed ME. And me, is the key.

The American Dream... Sure thing.

-pgardn Sunday rant (white knight style but not in action)

pgardn
12-03-2017, 11:03 AM
937279001684598784

Say this under oath, Trump.

Maybe it was a be nice to him, he's a good guy.

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 11:14 AM
Actually she is regurgitating what some of you guys believe.

Interefernce = Collusion

This is where the Trump inability to let things go has again got him in trouble. So far the facts show interference as much more likely than collusion. For God's sake the Russians have basically stuck it in Obama's face as a parting shot, "we can do this, what are you going to do?" This lady knows this and she knows Trump. And to the Russians credit, they thought they might get Trump to deny the interference by doing what almost every US president has done since Putin has been in power, try to start out a new relationship (even though the Russians has basically admitted to interfering) The collusion idea is also very pleasing in some ways to the Russians.

So Trump has gone further than other US presidents, except he was not allowed. He was forced to sign a sanctions and threw some diplomats out. Then in another naive, juvenile way he had his administration reason with the Russians to not respond.



The bottom line is many "libtards, repugs, and Russians" don't want the US "policing the world"

This nebulous policing term extends to leaving Russia alone cause they really are not a problem. News flash, they are. They firmly believe strongmen and an abiding rich political class are much easier to deal with than democracy. So do we to some extent. The Russians want chaos outside of their own country, in specific locations at present. That way they can recreate a semblance of the old Soviet Union. This is really all they can hope for; A prideful outcome. because economically they, and their system, suck.

Which leads ads in to this aside:

Meanwhile "libtards and Trump's repulsive repug base" also have a shared goal economically. (Now taxes...)

An Economic break for lower to mid range wage earners. Meanwhile, "Oh look, the stock Market!" I get even more money in dividends most likely and at the same time have a paper wealth more than I ever dreamed of as a teenager. For doing nothing more than reinvesting? Really, really tough work on that end. White boy gets good education, is in the right field knowing the right people at the perfect time, works hard (but not in a backbreaking ditch) and can (but no desire, the opposite) retire way, way early? I cannot possibly give back in a monetary way what this country has allowed ME. And me, is the key.

The American Dream... Sure thing.

-pgardn Sunday rant (white knight style but not in action)

Not reading that blob of junk. and Read the full quote from.the email. It said nothing about democratic perspective in the line of "they threw the election for him". Nothing. So get that shit out of here.

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 11:15 AM
937340701322379264

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 11:16 AM
937346964462751755

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 11:20 AM
937339294171009024
Lordy!

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 11:21 AM
937341483073593351
As is Mueller

Reck
12-03-2017, 11:21 AM
937339294171009024
Lordy!

This is good and all but I have to hear it from non democrats. I still believe these in-houses investigations are total jokes.

Mueller ftw.

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 11:25 AM
This is good and all but I have to hear it from non democrats. I still believe these in-houses investigations are total jokes.

Mueller ftw.

Think about it this way. Trump asked Burr, A Republican on the Senate intel committee to drop the investigation. And he told him to fuck off. But yeah Mueller has got this. Which is why Trump keeps shitting himself on twitter.

pgardn
12-03-2017, 11:48 AM
Not reading that blob of junk. and Read the full quote from.the email. It said nothing about democratic perspective in the line of "they threw the election for him". Nothing. So get that shit out of here.

Touche Djohn.

Because much of your stuff is, a blob of junk.
Only you have pretty pictures.

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 11:48 AM
Touche Djohn.

Because much of your stuff is, a blob of junk.
Only you have pretty pictures.

Because no indictments have been brought forward right? Oh wait they have :lol

pgardn
12-03-2017, 12:01 PM
Think about it this way. Trump asked Burr, A Republican on the Senate intel committee to drop the investigation. And he told him to fuck off. But yeah Mueller has got this. Which is why Trump keeps shitting himself on twitter.

Because there is collusion.

No.
There is no evidence you have presented.
Zero.

Base the events on a man who has shown us he can be incredibly vindictive about the most minor things (find those 3 million votes!)

Drop it because my family and a bunch of associates along with Trump lying (so what's new ? it maybe criminal now)

Drop it because we made plans with the Russians to fix the election...? No. Zero. Zilch. Still nada.

Well we got Flynn and his son possibly getting to keep a pile of money. And the fact Flynn lied for Trump and has been totally disgraced for lying, if this even matters to him.

Trill Clinton
12-03-2017, 12:02 PM
next day you're sweatin; forgetting your lies. alibis aint matching up, bullshit catching up.

pgardn
12-03-2017, 12:04 PM
Because no indictments have been brought forward right? Oh wait they have :lol

Yes they have.
And they should be and I'm glad.

You have not a Fckn clue where I'm coming from because you enjoy sensationalism.
But you pretend like it's collusion, keep the laughing emoticons coming for both of us.

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 12:07 PM
Yes they have.
And they should be and I'm glad.

You have not a Fckn clue where I'm coming from because you enjoy sensationalism.
But you pretend like it's collusion, keep the laughing emoticons coming for both of us.

I've said multiple times. The actual charge will be conspiracy to defraud the US. Funny though that you say there is no proof when Trump's own adviser admitted it. That's the actual fucking line in that email.

pgardn
12-03-2017, 12:08 PM
next day you're sweatin; forgetting your lies. alibis aint matching up, bullshit catching up.

I dont know how much Flynn is sweatin.
Obama fired him (already had him pegged as a liar and willing to do the bizzare.)

I hope Flynn is doing much more than sweatin. "He's a nice guy" Comey, "yes he is". He's a nice guy because he willing to lie for you and is in a position to make money outside his salary doing so.

pgardn
12-03-2017, 12:10 PM
I've said multiple times. The actual charge will be conspiracy to defraud the US. Funny though that you say there is no proof when Trump's own adviser admitted it. That's the actual fucking line in that email.

The actual charge and then, but, but, funny you should mention that? [Insert laughing emoticon]
There should be piles of evidence when partners collude to change the outcome of the biggest democracy in the world.

But, but, all thy had to do was change Wisconsin.... and...ad nauseum
And know all the keys before the election.

GTFOH

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 12:12 PM
Not sure why you are spazzing out.

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 12:14 PM
937277955562246145
Read it again. The last part. Why would Democrats care be concerned for Trump that his relationship with Russia would sour? That was HER point of view. Her words. Like a moron.

florige
12-03-2017, 12:14 PM
937279001684598784

Say this under oath, Trump.


Twitter is tearing him a new one after this one. I guess he forgets his own lies.

pgardn
12-03-2017, 12:16 PM
Not sure why you are spazzing out.

Collusion.

Plain and simple. Dump it. Say it's outrageous.
Even though I wish it could be proven at this point.

boutons_deux
12-03-2017, 12:20 PM
Yet another FEDERAL lie

Jared Kushner failed to disclose West Bank funding ties

Jared Kushner failed to disclose his role as a co-director of the Charles and Seryl Kushner Foundation from 2006 to 2015, a time when the group funded an Israeli settlement considered to be illegal under international law (https://interactive.aljazeera.com/aje/2017/50-years-illegal-settlements/index.html),

The latest development follows reports (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/michael-flynn-charged-with-making-false-statement-to-the-fbi/2017/12/01/e03a6c48-d6a2-11e7-9461-ba77d604373d_story.html?utm_term=.61bdee460d28&wpisrc=al_news__alert-politics--alert-national&wpmk=1) on Friday indicating the White House senior adviser attempted to sway a United Nations Security Council vote against an anti-settlement resolution passed just before Donald Trump took office

The first son-in-law has repeatedly amended his financial records since his initial filing in March, along with three separate revisions to his security clearance application.

Despite correcting his financial history on multiple occasions,

he has yet to include his role as co-director to the family foundation.

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/jared-kushner-failed-to-disclose-west-bank-funding-ties/

JK still has a top national security clearance

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 12:23 PM
Collusion.

Plain and simple. Dump it. Say it's outrageous.
Even though I wish it could be proven at this point.
It will be proven. You want to dump something before the investigation is even over? or are you pro trump?

Reck
12-03-2017, 12:32 PM
Not sure why you are spazzing out.

Tbh...I dont know what he's trying to say. Pgardn is all over the place.

TSA
12-03-2017, 01:09 PM
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/362856-cnn-white-house-claims-obama-admin-approved-flynn-calls-with-russian#

Clapper left himself room there by calling the claim a “stretch”
Things just got more interesting

936720362561208320

936962187846934528

https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2017/01/266932.htm

QUESTION: No, I got just one more. You probably have seen --

MR TONER: Excuse me.

QUESTION: -- reports starting yesterday, but then more of them this morning, about contact between the incoming national security advisor and the Russian ambassador. I’m just wondering, from the State Department’s point of view, is this something that’s of concern at all? Or – I’ll just leave it there and then follow up.

MR TONER: Again, not necessarily – I’ve seen the reports. I don’t think they’ve been confirmed or corroborated yet. But that’s – as he’s part of the transition team, that’s really for them to speak to in how they are engaging. I mean --

QUESTION: Right, but --

MR TONER: -- the president-elect is also engaged on his own with many world leaders.

QUESTION: Right.

MR TONER: So I don’t want to speculate and I don’t want to --

QUESTION: So there’s nothing – this building doesn’t see anything necessarily inappropriate about contact between members of the incoming administration and foreign officials --

MR TONER: No.

QUESTION: -- no matter what country they’re from?

MR TONER: No.

QUESTION: Right?

MR TONER: No. And again, this has been ongoing. I mean, we stand ready if they want to work through the State Department to contact some of these individuals, but we have no comment or no problem with them doing such on their own.

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 01:12 PM
Lol TSA still trying to spin.

Pavlov
12-03-2017, 01:14 PM
I think it's good that everyone is laser focused on this micro event. All the other work goes on.

TSA
12-03-2017, 01:27 PM
Lol TSA still trying to spin.

Flynn was authorized by Obama admin to speak with Kislyak.
:lol Clapper
:lol that’s absurd

TSA
12-03-2017, 01:27 PM
936930514761641984

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 01:43 PM
937372110720204801

FuzzyLumpkins
12-03-2017, 01:48 PM
Touche Djohn.

Because much of your stuff is, a blob of junk.
Only you have pretty pictures.

Actually almost all of his posts here are tweets the opposite of what you call them here. Nice parrot though.

Pavlov
12-03-2017, 01:48 PM
KT's email didn't come from wikileaks, did it?

lol

FuzzyLumpkins
12-03-2017, 01:50 PM
Collusion.

Plain and simple. Dump it. Say it's outrageous.
Even though I wish it could be proven at this point.

Outrageous? Hardly. Not proven beyond a reasonable doubt sure. ARe you on the wrong troll or something?

boutons_deux
12-03-2017, 01:58 PM
Collusion, at very least passive collusion, Trash and his team knowing Pootin was subverting Hillary's campaign. McFarland knew, and she referred to J-Beau "I do declaya that I don't recall 100 times" Sessions

I bet Jared gave his demographic data to Cambridge Anal. who combined it with their own data, then gave to Pootin's hacker troops.

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 02:03 PM
Flynn was authorized by Obama admin to speak with Kislyak.
:lol Clapper
:lol that’s absurd

If Flynn was authorized why would he lie to the FBI about talking to Kislyak at all? :lmao

Btw, Flynn was still a private citizen.

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 02:03 PM
KT's email didn't come from wikileaks, did it?

lol

:lol 10 bucks Priebus leaked it.

Reck
12-03-2017, 02:06 PM
Flynn was authorized by Obama admin to speak with Kislyak.
:lol Clapper
:lol that’s absurd

I highly doubt that given that Obama fired Flynn 2 years prior to him even meeting Kislyak.

This should help guide you.

http://www.factcheck.org/2017/12/michael-flynns-russia-timeline/

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 02:07 PM
I highly doubt that given that Obama fired Flynn 2 years prior to him even meeting Kislyak.

This should help guide you.

http://www.factcheck.org/2017/12/michael-flynns-russia-timeline/

And then Obama warned Trump not to hire Flynn.

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 02:08 PM
936651991652159494
Just for you TSA

spurraider21
12-03-2017, 02:12 PM
:wow Susan rice implicated

TSA
12-03-2017, 02:17 PM
If Flynn was authorized why would he lie to the FBI about talking to Kislyak at all? :lmao

Btw, Flynn was still a private citizen.

He knew there were transcripts of his calls with Kislyak as they were already leaked to WaPo. He knew he was contradicting the transcripts when speaking to the FBI. He lied on purpose, the question now is why?

Reck
12-03-2017, 02:18 PM
:wow Susan rice implicated

Your thoughts on this, Spur21.

937391123835817985

At the very least, this has to be malpractice, right?

TSA
12-03-2017, 02:19 PM
I highly doubt that given that Obama fired Flynn 2 years prior to him even meeting Kislyak.

This should help guide you.

http://www.factcheck.org/2017/12/michael-flynns-russia-timeline/i just provided a video of the state department stating Flynn was allowed to speak with Kislyak and you still “highly doubt that” :rollin

Pavlov
12-03-2017, 02:19 PM
The Dowd ate my homework.

Reck
12-03-2017, 02:21 PM
He knew there were transcripts of his calls with Kislyak as they were already leaked to WaPo. He knew he was contradicting the transcripts when speaking to the FBI. He lied on purpose, the question now is why?

Holy shit.

Who lies to the FBI willingly for the purpose to get caught?

3-D chess baby.

TSA
12-03-2017, 02:25 PM
Holy shit.

Who lies to the FBI willingly for the purpose to get caught?

3-D chess baby.
Who purposely lies? A 33 year spook with intimate knowledge of the intelligence community.

Pavlov
12-03-2017, 02:29 PM
:lol literally every fuckup by the Trump administration is spun by TSA into part of his grand game to bring down Satan worshiping, baby eating Clinton and Obama.

Q said so.

Splits
12-03-2017, 02:36 PM
Who purposely lies? A 33 year spook with intimate knowledge of the intelligence community.

I wonder what site came up with this line of defense you're now parroting.

:cry process crime :cry

TSA
12-03-2017, 02:36 PM
Holy shit.

Who lies to the FBI willingly for the purpose to get caught?

3-D chess baby.remember that early on Flynn “had a story to tell”. He now gets to tell his story without any limitations.

936972454701957120

Any and all crimes. He served for 33 years, he’s got dirt on everyone.

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 02:42 PM
remember that early on Flynn “had a story to tell”. He now gets to tell his story without any limitations.

936972454701957120

Any and all crimes. He served for 33 years, he’s got dirt on everyone.

Funny you made fun of me for quoting Mensch who has been right the whole time and Is at least verified on Twitter while you follow some nobody :lmao

Reck
12-03-2017, 02:45 PM
i just provided a video of the state department stating Flynn was allowed to speak with Kislyak and you still “highly doubt that” :rollin

You sure love to cherry pick.

You cant say he was "authorized" by the Obama admin and then have factual reports that Obama himself warned against hiring Flynn be true at the same time.

I know the Trumpies talking point has morphed into the "Flynn was Obama's personnel" talking point but no one buys that nonsense.

Reck
12-03-2017, 02:46 PM
Who purposely lies? A 33 year spook with intimate knowledge of the intelligence community.

:lmao

TSA
12-03-2017, 02:47 PM
Funny you made fun of me for quoting Mensch who has been right the whole time and Is at least verified on Twitter while you follow some nobody :lmao


:lol Marshal of the Supreme Court

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 02:49 PM
:lol Marshal of the Supreme Court

Following an unverified acount, backward ass TSA.

Reck
12-03-2017, 02:49 PM
:lol Marshal of the Supreme Court

Dude, call it blind, dumb luck but she's been more right than you have all this time.

:lol Pizzagate
:lol Susan Rice
:lol Flynn got caught on purpose

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 02:51 PM
But no seriously.

- Susan Rice not indicted
- Hillary Clinton not indicted.
- Mike Flynn not cleared by the FBI
- Pizzagate a real nothingburger
- Presidents still can't order wiretaps
- Uranium one turned to Uranium None
- FISA warrants granted
- Manafort and Flynn indicted
- 4 members so far of Trump's team are indicted

TSA
12-03-2017, 02:51 PM
You sure love to cherry pick.

You cant say he was "authorized" by the Obama admin and then have factual reports that Obama himself warned against hiring Flynn be true at the same time.

I know the Trumpies talking point has morphed into the "Flynn was Obama's personnel" talking point but no one buys that nonsense.

He was authorized to talk to Kislyak by the Obama administration, this isn’t up for debate.

936962187846934528

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 02:55 PM
He was authorized to talk to Kislyak by the Obama administration, this isn’t up for debate.

936962187846934528

Flynn was an unauthorized citizen contacting a foreign power who was in a dispute with the United STATES. Do you get that?

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 02:57 PM
Flynn was also trying to shape policy as an unauthorized citizen.

dabom
12-03-2017, 02:58 PM
Taken down by his own twitter and big mouth. :lol

dabom
12-03-2017, 02:59 PM
Why do people reply to this tsa guy. It's really doesn't go anywhere. :lol

TSA
12-03-2017, 03:01 PM
Flynn was an unauthorized citizen contacting a foreign power who was in a dispute with the United STATES. Do you get that?

Flynn was the incoming National Security Advosor on the transition team. You don’t know what the fuck you are talking about. Flynn was authorized by the Obama administration to speak with Kislyak.

https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/prs.../01/266932.htm

QUESTION: No, I got just one more. You probably have seen --

MR TONER: Excuse me.

QUESTION: -- reports starting yesterday, but then more of them this morning, about contact between the incoming national security advisor and the Russian ambassador. I’m just wondering, from the State Department’s point of view, is this something that’s of concern at all? Or – I’ll just leave it there and then follow up.

MR TONER: Again, not necessarily – I’ve seen the reports. I don’t think they’ve been confirmed or corroborated yet. But that’s – as he’s part of the transition team, that’s really for them to speak to in how they are engaging. I mean --

QUESTION: Right, but --

MR TONER: -- the president-elect is also engaged on his own with many world leaders.

QUESTION: Right.

MR TONER: So I don’t want to speculate and I don’t want to --

QUESTION: So there’s nothing – this building doesn’t see anything necessarily inappropriate about contact between members of the incoming administration and foreign officials --

MR TONER: No.

QUESTION: -- no matter what country they’re from?

MR TONER: No.

QUESTION: Right?

MR TONER: No. And again, this has been ongoing. I mean, we stand ready if they want to work through the State Department to contact some of these individuals, but we have no comment or no problem with them doing such on their own.

Reck
12-03-2017, 03:04 PM
He was authorized to talk to Kislyak by the Obama administration, this isn’t up for debate.

936962187846934528

Other than this video, is there any documents that shows the Obama Admin "authorized" Flynn specifically? Show me.

You keep reposting this video like it's the holy grail. I guess we should've taken everything Sean Spicer said to be 100% factual. After all, he did report to Trump personally as his press secretary.

Reck
12-03-2017, 03:11 PM
MR TONER: Again, not necessarily – I’ve seen the reports. I don’t think they’ve been confirmed or corroborated yet. But that’s – as he’s part of the transition team, that’s really for them to speak to in how they are engaging. I mean --

I have a feeling it boils down to this.

For you, this constitutes "authorization."

And I'm sorry to say, no that's not how it works.

Their transition team, their prerogative on how they conduct themselves. The Obama admin is not responsible for how they decided to handle business.

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 03:17 PM
TSA not knowing the Logan act prohibits unauthorized citizens from contacting a foreign power who is in a dispute with the US.

TSA
12-03-2017, 03:24 PM
TSA not knowing the Logan act prohibits unauthorized citizens from contacting a foreign power who is in a dispute with the US.

Flynn wasn’t an unauthorized private citizen. Flynn was a government representative on the transition team of the President elect. You don’t know what the fuck you are talking about.

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 03:34 PM
Flynn wasn’t an unauthorized private citizen. Flynn was a government representative on the transition team of the President elect. You don’t know what the fuck you are talking about.

LOL. Flynn was going against then current US policy. He was also still a private citizen. And no he did not represent the government at that time because Trump was not sworn in yet you dumbass cocksucker.

Reck
12-03-2017, 03:35 PM
TSA didn't read my factcheck link. That's too bad.

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 03:36 PM
What this means, unavoidably, is that the Trump transition team was carrying on a rogue foreign policy effort, on issues of the highest sensitivity to U.S. interests, with neither State Department oversight nor expertise. Flynn and others sought concessions, made assurances and negotiated deals behind the back of the Obama administration — on matters they could not have fully understood

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 03:44 PM
Your thoughts on this, Spur21.

937391123835817985

At the very least, this has to be malpractice, right?

937419035427213312

AaronY
12-03-2017, 03:59 PM
:sleep

djohn2oo8
12-03-2017, 04:01 PM
:sleep

Yet you keep coming back.

pgardn
12-03-2017, 04:09 PM
Collusion.

Plain and simple. Dump it. Say it's outrageous.
Even though I wish it could be proven at this point.


Tbh...I dont know what he's trying to say. Pgardn is all over the place.

Nothing.
Forget it.