Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[Pavlov]

I don't know why you keep bringing up Gowdy as neither he nor Nunes saw the documents they requested.What did Gowdy say he had not seen?

Nunes never looks at anything that's given to him so he's irrelevant.

[djohn2oo8]

I don't know why you keep bringing up Gowdy as neither he nor Nunes saw the documents they requested.

"The FBI acted appropriately" -Trey Gowdy

[spurraider21]

"lol Louise Mensch"

IIRC that was the day the Papadopoulos story dropped?
no clue tbh... i just saw that post and assumed those were the 2 january articles you were talkin about. then was just funny to hear you had never seen that one :lol

[Chris]

1001793766737547264

Bongino podcast is where it's at. 1 hour every day. Check out the Downer interview which states Poopoodoopoolous had nothing to do with the fake dossier.

*nevermind I can see you are already armed with that information :tu

[Pavlov]

no clue tbh... i just saw that post and assumed those were the 2 january articles you were talkin about. then was just funny to hear you had never seen that one :lolYeah, I didn't use that one the second time when Darrin was making his demands. Weird.

[Chris]

You were spamming the drunk Papadapolous article when the Steele dossier started to fall apart. If that is not the story you are saying started it what is your new story on how it started?

He was selling that shit. He knows it. We know it.

[djohn2oo8]

He was selling that shit. He knows it. We know it.

"The FBI acted appropriately" -Trey Gowdy

[TSA]

He was selling that shit. He knows it. We know it.

Yeah he knows it. "check your timeline TSA" :lol

[Pavlov]

You were spamming the drunk Papadapolous article when the Steele dossier started to fall apart. If that is not the story you are saying started it what is your new story on how it started?

He was selling that shit. He knows it. We know it.Actually, I posted this:

Yeah, haven't seen Estonia explicitly mentioned, but it looks like they're the basis for these January reports:

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/article127231799.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/19/us/politics/trump-russia-associates-investigation.html?_r=0
on the very day the Papadopoulos story broke.

Just follow the link and scroll up from my post.

Any other questions about this, TSA?

[Pavlov]

Yeah he knows it. "check your timeline TSA" :lolClick the link and scroll up, TSA.

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=266387&p=9233883&viewfull=1#post9233883

What do you see?

[djohn2oo8]

1001825097836003333

[Pavlov]

1001825097836003333NO NO NO NO NO

YOU CAN'T POST A TWEET FROM AN ACTUAL PERSON

[TSA]

What did Gowdy say he had not seen?

Nunes never looks at anything that's given to him so he's irrelevant.

Specific documents were requested on Halper and they were not shown those documents. The meeting they attended was about the DOJ/FBI withholding these documents and how they'd work on releasing the documents.

[boutons_deux]

1001825097836003333

... wait 'till Nunes gets his shitty hands on Mueller's report to Congress.

[djohn2oo8]

Specific documents were requested on Halper and they were not shown those documents. The meeting they attended was about the DOJ/FBI withholding these documents and how they'd work on releasing the documents.

What did Gowdy say that he hasn't seen???

[Pavlov]

Specific documents were requested on Halper and they were not shown those documents. The meeting they attended was about the DOJ/FBI withholding these documents and how they'd work on releasing the documents.Does Gowdy accuse them of doing something nefarious RE: those documents?

Because they only thing I've heard is from Gowdy when he says the FBI acted appropriately.

Have you seen anything different from him about this meeting, TSA?

[djohn2oo8]

Oh and let's not forget Rubio saying the FBI did right

[Pavlov]

Oh and let's not forget Rubio saying the FBI did rightIs there anyone from Congress who went to that meeting saying the FBI did wrong?

TSA?

[TSA]

Does Gowdy accuse them of doing something nefarious RE: those documents?

Because they only thing I've heard is from Gowdy when he says the FBI acted appropriately.

Have you seen anything different from him about this meeting, TSA?

He hasn't seen those documents how would he comment on their content?

[djohn2oo8]

Is there anyone from Congress who went to that meeting saying the FBI did wrong?

TSA?

:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

He hasn't seen those documents how would he comment on their content?

How would he know what documents he hasn't seen if he hasn't commented on it?

[Pavlov]

He hasn't seen those documents how would he comment on their content?He didn't say "the FBI acted appropriately except for maybe something in documents I haven't seen."

[djohn2oo8]

1000170903479734272
Spygate ded

[djohn2oo8]

999761583768260609
lol TSA

[Pavlov]

Yeah he knows it. "check your timeline TSA" :lolYou clammed up quickly after this post.

Do you have any other demands about the timeline of my belief the Russia investigation did not start with Papadopoulos, TSA?

Yes or no.

[djohn2oo8]

1001923994654789632
:rollin

[Chris]

I love how Gowdy is the be all end all whenever he supports the FBI. If he supports Trump he becomes a latent homosexual with a bad haircut.

[djohn2oo8]

1001818025933369350
Lordy!

[Pavlov]

I love how Gowdy is the be all end all whenever he supports the FBI. If he supports Trump he becomes a latent homosexual with a bad haircut.His hair is much better now tbh.

Are you saying Gowdy bad now, Chris?

Yes or no.

[TSA]

Click the link and scroll up, TSA.

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=266387&p=9233883&viewfull=1#post9233883

What do you see?

I see djohn blowing his wad over the NYT drunk Papadapolous story and you playing right along. The question has been when the FBI started their investigation and the story you've pushed has changed numerous times.

[djohn2oo8]

I see djohn blowing his wad over the NYT drunk Papadapolous story and you playing right along. The question has been when the FBI started their investigation and the story you've pushed has changed numerous times.

Guess what? The investigation already started way before the dossier was finished dipshit :lol

[djohn2oo8]

Gowdy got the boy shook

[Pavlov]

I see djohn blowing his wad over the NYT drunk Papadapolous story and you playing right along. The question has been when the FBI started their investigation and the story you've pushed has changed numerous times.Sorry, TSA -- it hasn't changed since I read those articles.

I never pushed Papadopoulos as the start.

You got the answer you demanded.

It just wasn't the answer you wanted.

lol

[djohn2oo8]

Sorry, TSA -- it hasn't changed since I read those articles.

You got the answer you demanded.

It just wasn't the answer you wanted.

lol

TSA. The idiot Spurstalk neither needs nor deserves right now

[Pavlov]

TSA. The idiot Spurstalk neither needs nor deserves right nowWell he's gullible and malleable. Dude can't even make up his mind about Mueller after a full year.

[TSA]

Guess what? The investigation already started way before the dossier was finished dipshit :lol


947143610687946753

[TSA]

TSA. The idiot Spurstalk neither needs nor deserves right now

You don't get to call anyone an idiot after betting $2000 that Trump, Trump Jr, Kushner, and Ivanka were all going to prison.

[Pavlov]

It's important for TSA to say other people have changed their stories because his has changed more times than anyone else's.

[djohn2oo8]

TSA you have yet to prove the investigation didn't start before the dossier.

[Pavlov]

I truthfully don't know what TSA's conspiracy theory is at this point. That's why I ask him.

He never answers.

[TSA]

Sorry, TSA -- it hasn't changed since I read those articles.

I never pushed Papadopoulos as the start.

You got the answer you demanded.

It just wasn't the answer you wanted.

lol

I specifically asked you when you thought the FBI started their investigation, you punted and are now waiting for your new marching orders since Steele and Papadapolous died.

[djohn2oo8]

I truthfully don't know what TSA's conspiracy theory is at this point. That's why I ask him.

He never answers.

He just needs to eat more Pizza. Maybe it will jog his memory

[TSA]

TSA you have yet to prove the investigation didn't start before the dossier.

I never made the claim it didn't.

[djohn2oo8]

I specifically asked you when you thought the FBI started their investigation, you punted and are now waiting for your new marching orders since Steele and Papadapolous died.

Nope. Papadapolous is getting ready to be sentenced.

[djohn2oo8]

I never made the claim it didn't.

So what are you arguing? :lol

[Pavlov]

I specifically asked you when you thought the FBI started their investigation, you punted and are now waiting for your new marching orders since Steele and Papadapolous died.Sorry, you got your answer after stamping your feet. I was going to let you stamp a little more but our researcher came up with the links I was talking about.

You can't pretend you didn't get the answer now.

:lol Look at what you've reduced yourself to -- you have to create a fantasy ST timeline where I pushed the Papadopoulos affair as the beginning of the Russia investigation.

In short, you are lying.

Why do you have to lie, TSA?

[Pavlov]

I never made the claim it didn't.What is your claim, TSA?

When are you saying the Russia investigation started?

[TSA]

So what are you arguing? :lol

I'm just asking you what your story is now. First it was the dossier started the investigation, then it was Papadapolous started the investigation. Now what started the investigation?

[Pavlov]

I'm just asking you what your story is now. First it was the dossier started the investigation, then it was Papadapolous started the investigation. Now what started the investigation?What is your story, TSA?

When are you saying the Russia investigation started?

[TSA]

What is your claim, TSA?

When are you saying the Russia investigation started?

I honestly don't know when the FBI started their counterintelligence investigation...their leaks to the media keep changing.

[Pavlov]

I honestly don't know when the FBI started their counterintelligence investigation...their leaks to the media keep changing.So when do you think it started based on everything you know?

[TSA]

Nope. Papadapolous is getting ready to be sentenced.

999362574796902401

999366584668913664

better hope that isn't the case djohn

[TSA]

So when do you think it started based on everything you know?

I honestly don't know when the FBI started their counterintelligence investigation...their leaks to the media keep changing.

[Pavlov]

I honestly don't know when the FBI started their counterintelligence investigation...their leaks to the media keep changing.The "leak" showing the starting point I believe has been out for over a year and nothing I've seen predates that point.

Damn, TSA.

You don't know that -- you don't know what your conspiracy theory today is -- can you actually say anything right now about what you believe instead of trying to accuse others of changing their beliefs?

[djohn2oo8]

Damn, TSA.

You don't know that -- you don't know what your conspiracy theory today is -- can you actually say anything right now about what you believe instead of trying to accuse others of changing their beliefs?

:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

TSA after pizzagate

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/020/515/roadragebrawl.JPG

[TSA]

Damn, TSA.

You don't know that -- you don't know what your conspiracy theory today is -- can you actually say anything right now about what you believe instead of trying to accuse others of changing their beliefs?

I can say with confidence that the reported start date of the FBI counterintelligence investigation has changed multiple times. Do you deny that yes or no?

[djohn2oo8]

I can say with confidence that the reported start date of the FBI counterintelligence investigation has changed multiple times. Do you deny that yes or no?

You just said you did not know anything

[djohn2oo8]

TSA sure got his ass kicked on spygate

[Pavlov]

I can say with confidence that the reported start date of the FBI counterintelligence investigation has changed multiple times. Do you deny that yes or no?Not since January of last year that I've seen but sure, there could be more information forthcoming.

You didn't even know about that until you were told by us today, so you have to factor your own proven ignorance into any confidence you assert from here on.

[TSA]

You just said you did not know anything

I do know you'll be paying me $2000

[TSA]

Not since January of last year that I've seen.

You didn't even know about that until you were told by us today, so you have to factor your own proven ignorance into any confidence you assert from here on.

Since January of last year what was the start date of the FBI counterintelligence investigation did you see?

[djohn2oo8]

I do know you'll be paying me $2000

:lol spygate

[Pavlov]

Since January of last year what was the start date of the FBI counterintelligence investigation did you see?Here you go with the pointless questions now.

I believe the general times put forth in those articles. I believed them since I first read them. If something else comes out I can certainly reconsider.

You believe nothing about the start of the Russia investigation.

You were completely ignorant about these articles from three major outlets.

That's where we stand.

[Chris]

Not since January of last year that I've seen but sure, there could be more information forthcoming.

Then why are you asking for specific details? You acknowledge you know nothing right here.

lol

[Pavlov]

Then why are you asking for specific details? You acknowledge you know nothing right here.

lolI said what I believe, Chris.

TSA believes nothing.

You believe nothing.

This is where we stand.

[TSA]

Here you go with the pointless questions now.

I believe the general times put forth in those articles. I believed them since I first read them. If something else comes out I can certainly reconsider.

You believe nothing about the start of the Russia investigation.

You were completely ignorant about these articles from three major outlets.

That's where we stand.

What is the “general time” you think the FBI counterintelligence investigation started?

[Chris]

1001952809317740547

Man looks confident.

[djohn2oo8]

lol TSBot

[djohn2oo8]

1001952809317740547

Man looks confident.

Wait, didn't you tell me the other day that I jump at whatever Rudy says? now look at you :rollin

[Pavlov]

What is the “general time” you think the FBI counterintelligence investigation started?More pointless questions along with a goalpost move.

Sorry, TSA.

You believe nothing.

Try again when you believe something.

Anything.

We'll discuss it.

[Reck]

1001952809317740547

Man looks confident.

Well yeah he should given that he's not the one facing impeachment or serious crimes. :lol

[Chris]

Well yeah he should given that he's not the one facing impeachment or serious crimes. :lol

You still think Trump is getting impeached? :lmao

[Reck]

You still think Trump is getting impeached? :lmao

I didn't say he would. But he could be facing getting impeached.

It doesn't matter if he ultimately doesn't. He'll be damage good by 2020.

Keep laughing though. It's a good coping mechanism.

[djohn2oo8]

You still think Trump is getting impeached? :lmao

Chris so nervous he can't ask a question without projecting laughter.

[Chris]

I didn't say he would. But he could be facing getting impeached.

It doesn't matter if he ultimately doesn't. He'll be damage good by 2020.

Keep laughing though. It's a good coping mechanism.

:lol


I'll be laughing all the way to the voting booth in 2020. Democrat Party is FUBAR.

[TSA]

More pointless questions along with a goalpost move.

Sorry, TSA.

You believe nothing.

Try again when you believe something.

Anything.

We'll discuss it.

Why can’t you give a general time when you think the FBI counterintelligence investigation started?

[Pavlov]

Why can’t you give a general time when you think the FBI counterintelligence investigation started?After the dates given in the articles I posted.

What is your conspiracy theory today, TSA?

[TSA]

After the dates given in the articles I posted.

What is your conspiracy theory today, TSA?

What are the dates? Just give a general time when you think the FBI counterintelligence investigation started. I’m not sure why you are stalling.

[Chris]

1001963582785978368

[Pavlov]

What are the dates? Just give a general time when you think the FBI counterintelligence investigation started. I’m not sure why you are stalling.I gave you a general time, TSA: after the start of the investigation spelled out in the articles that are a revelation to you just today.

You can't ask for a general time then demand specific dates.

What is your conspiracy theory today, TSA?

[TSA]

947143610687946753


Board Republicans might have to wait until after the holidays to be told how to react to this.

Are you now claiming the NYT article you were referencing about drunk Papadopoulos was false?

[TSA]

I gave you a general time, TSA: after the start of the investigation spelled out in the articles that are a revelation to you just today.

You can't ask for a general time then demand specific dates.

What is your conspiracy theory today, TSA?

There were multiple articles. I’m asking YOU to put a general time on and you clam up. What are the dates? Just give a general time when you think the FBI counterintelligence investigation started. I’m not sure why you are stalling.

[Pavlov]

Are you now claiming the NYT article you were referencing about drunk Papadopoulos was false?You're still trying to litigate this?

It was news that you are still receiving orders on how to spin.

lol

[Chris]

1001962442262568961

[Pavlov]

There were multiple articles. I’m asking YOU to put a general time on and you clam up. What are the dates? Just give a general time when you think the FBI counterintelligence investigation started. I’m not sure why you are stalling.I just gave you a general time -- after the start of the investigation referenced in the articles.

You got what you asked for.

Again.

It wasn't the answer you wanted.

Again.

Sorry.

[TSA]

I just gave you a general time -- after the start of the investigation referenced in the articles.

You got what you asked for.

Again.

It wasn't the answer you wanted.

Again.

Sorry.

In those articles what was the general time they gave for the FBI counterintelligence investigation start?

[TSA]

You're still trying to litigate this?

It was news that you are still receiving orders on how to spin.

lol

It’s a simple question not sure why you are clamming up so suddenly.

Are you now claiming the NYT article you were referencing about drunk Papadopoulos was false?

[djohn2oo8]

lol what was the trap?

lol who set the trap?

lol get the fuck out of here. Someone is about to get fucked and it isn't Trump or anyone on his team.

oh yeah?

[Pavlov]

In those articles what was the general time they gave for the FBI counterintelligence investigation start?Oh, you didn't even read any of them.

OK.

Good talk.

[djohn2oo8]

The only thing fabricated so far has been the Trump/Russia collusion.

It's going to be hilarious when the only people indicted are the Dems who created and pushed the false narrative and then called for an investigation.

:lmao

[Pavlov]

It’s a simple question not sure why you are clamming up so suddenly.

Are you now claiming the NYT article you were referencing about drunk Papadopoulos was false?I said exactly what I thought people like you would do in that post. The post was about you.

You're still trying a year and a half later.

Turns out it was a pretty cool post. Thanks for reposting it and thanks for all the trying.

[djohn2oo8]

Except boots isn't right.

The FBI hasn't incriminated Trump or any of his entourage so his claim is moot.




:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

The reason given for the meeting was that they would be given evidence of Hillary accepting money from Russians, I don't have a problem at all with the meeting and there is nothing illegal about meeting with a foreign country for opposition research. With today's revelations about another Russian at the meeting tied to Fusion GPS it is quite obvious this was a set up for Trump Jr from the start IMO. I said as much when it was just the Russian lawyer but now we have two people at the meeting who worked with Fusion GPS. Are you writing off today's revelations as just another huge coincidence or are you able to accept this meeting was a setup by Fusion GPS...funded by the DNC.

Can you explain why you remained silent while the DNC reached out to the Ukrainian government and sent a representative to gather opposition research?

Yes it is illegal to involve a foreign country in a US election and then solicit stolen info from said country.

:lol TSA

[TSA]

Oh, you didn't even read any of them.

OK.

Good talk.


They’re your articles. I’m not sure why you are afraid to discuss them. In your articles what was the general time they gave for the FBI counterintelligence investigation start?

[djohn2oo8]

Point me to anywhere in the article where it says the letter has Trump saying he is firing Comey to halt the Russia investigation.

1001965240060465154
lawdy!

[Pavlov]

They’re your articles. I’m not sure why you are afraid to discuss them. In your articles what was the general time they gave for the FBI counterintelligence investigation start?You didn't read them. I'm not sure why you want to pretend to discuss these articles you haven't read.

Read them. Your question about the articles will be answered by the articles. There is no need to ask me about words in articles.

You have a question pending:

What is your conspiracy theory today?

[TSA]

You didn't read them. I'm not sure why you want to pretend to discuss these articles you haven't read.

Read them. Your question about the articles will be answered by the articles. There is no need to ask me about words in articles.

You have a question pending:

What is your conspiracy theory today?

I don’t have a conspiracy theory today. And I’ll accept your white flag. You’re as confused as I am on when the FBI counterintelligence investigation began.

[Pavlov]

I don’t have a conspiracy theory today.So you don't believe anything at all regarding the Russian investigation.

Not one thing.

lol


And I’ll accept your white flag. You’re as confused as I am on when the FBI counterintelligence investigation began.Nope. I have a general time I gave when you demanded it.

Asked and answered.

Pretty simple.

[djohn2oo8]

I don’t have a conspiracy theory today. And I’ll accept your white flag. You’re as confused as I am on when the FBI counterintelligence investigation began.

It's a criminal investigation now biatchhhh

[TSA]

1001965240060465154
lawdy!

no amount of griffin tweets or lawdys will stop you from losing 2 grand.

[dabom]

1001965240060465154
lawdy!

BoomX257

[djohn2oo8]

Trey Gowdy says there would be a Russia probe without the dossier. Lawdy!

[TSA]

So you don't believe anything at all regarding the Russian investigation.

Not one thing.

lol

Nope. I have a general time I gave when you demanded it.

Asked and answered.

Pretty simple.

:lol the flustered edit and misquote

[Winehole23]

I love how Gowdy is the be all end all whenever he supports the FBI. If he fails to support Trump he becomes a latent homosexual with a bad haircut.fify

[Pavlov]

Trey Gowdy says there would be a Russia probe without the dossier. Lawdy!Gowdy gotcha again, TSA.

[Pavlov]

:lol the flustered edit and misquoteYou got the answer you demanded.

You didn't get the answer you wanted.

Sorry, TSA. Not a good day for you at all.

[TSA]

It's a criminal investigation now biatchhhh

How many crimes so far concerning Trump/Russia election collusion?

[Pavlov]

How many crimes so far concerning Trump/Russia election collusion?lol flustered goalpost moves all day

[TSA]

Gowdy gotcha again, TSA.

Who claimed there wouldn’t?

:lol you and djohn sucking off Gowdy today has been entertaining

[Chris]

djohn and Kyle Griffin when a new NYT story comes out...

https://media3.giphy.com/media/yftN0Qg3Q5T1K/giphy.gif

[djohn2oo8]

How many crimes so far concerning Trump/Russia election collusion?

None involving Susan Rice

https://i.giphy.com/media/3Kz2JgzhJRB2E/giphy.webp

[Pavlov]

Who claimed there wouldn’t?

:lol you and djohn sucking off Gowdy today has been entertainingJust noting that he took a wet shit on you.

Twice.

[TSA]

lol flustered goalpost moves all day

Yes because asking about crimes in reference to criminal investigation claim is moving a goalpost. You aren't even making sense.

[Pavlov]

Yes because asking about crimes in reference to criminal investigation claim is moving a goalpost. You are even making sense.:lol flustered gammar

[Winehole23]

lol

[djohn2oo8]

Yes because asking about crimes in reference to criminal investigation claim is moving a goalpost. You aren't even making sense.

Glad to see you admit it is now a criminal investigation

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/FamousNippyAchillestang-max-1mb.gif

[Winehole23]

TSA hoping nobody noticed

[djohn2oo8]

:lmao the quick edit

[Pavlov]

TSA hoping nobody noticed:lol his panic edit

F5 joke incoming.

[TSA]

TSA hoping nobody noticed

Yes I hope nobody noticed. Damn.

[Chris]

1001975349134151681

[Pavlov]

1001975349134151681Anonymous conspiracy monger of the day!

[djohn2oo8]

And a live look at TSA

https://media1.tenor.com/images/0c73fcf7367835409f5364fcc250404e/tenor.gif?itemid=9046513

[spurraider21]

You still think Trump is getting impeached? :lmao
tbh you still think obama is getting impeached :lol

[djohn2oo8]

tbh you still think obama is getting impeached :lol

:lol

[Winehole23]

Yes I hope nobody noticed. Damn.You had to drive it in.

Thanks!

[TSA]

And a live look at TSA

https://media1.tenor.com/images/0c73fcf7367835409f5364fcc250404e/tenor.gif?itemid=9046513

TSA and Chris when djohn has to pay up on his $2000 loss

https://media1.giphy.com/media/l41lKFzpUyuHSK03S/200w.gif

[Chris]

tbh you still think obama is getting impeached :lol

Trust the process.

[Chris]

TSA and Chris when djohn has to pay up on his $2000 loss

https://media1.giphy.com/media/l41lKFzpUyuHSK03S/200w.gif

:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

TSA and Chris when djohn has to pay up on his $2000 loss

https://media1.giphy.com/media/l41lKFzpUyuHSK03S/200w.gif
Because your history with bets is why you lost your original name :lol

[Pavlov]

Trust the process.What is the process for impeaching Obama, Chris?

Walk us through it.

[djohn2oo8]

What is the process for impeaching Obama, Chris?

Walk us through it.

:lmao :lmao

[spurraider21]

TSA... from Pav's bbc article

Last April, the CIA director was shown intelligence that worried him. It was - allegedly - a tape recording of a conversation about money from the Kremlin going into the US presidential campaign.
It was passed to the US by an intelligence agency of one of the Baltic States. The CIA cannot act domestically against American citizens so a joint counter-intelligence taskforce was created.

[TSA]

1001965240060465154
lawdy!

One person who was briefed on Mr. Rosenstein’s conversation with the president said Mr. Trump had simply wanted Mr. Rosenstein to mention that he was not personally under investigation in the Russia inquiry. Mr. Rosenstein said it was unnecessary and did not include such a reference. Mr. Trump ultimately said it himself when announcing the firing.

:cry

1001962171776012289

They are going after Rosenstein now....IG release got em all shook.

[spurraider21]

its amazing that you cant just read the articles and are demanding other people to break it down for you :lol

it's not like you're being told to do the research. the research is given and you're just too lazy to gloss over it

[Chris]

What is the process for impeaching Obama, Chris?

Walk us through it.

Congress + 2/3 majority. Did you really need that explained to you?

[spurraider21]

Congress + 2/3 majority. Did you really need that explained to you?
that's how the US impeaches officers of the federal government

obama isn't an officer of the federal government. what would be the process for impeaching obama?

[Pavlov]

Congress + 2/3 majority. Did you really need that explained to you?Actually, yes -- I do need the process for impeaching a president who has been out of office for over a year.

I don't see anything in the Constitution about it. Maybe there's some relevant case law

[Chris]

tbh you still think obama is getting impeached :lol

If Obama committed federal crimes then obviously Congress would stay out of the way. The whole point of impeachment is to prevent him from holding future office. In this case you would have to favor the criminal justice system over Congress.

[TSA]

TSA... from Pav's bbc article

Last April, the CIA director was shown intelligence that worried him. It was - allegedly - a tape recording of a conversation about money from the Kremlin going into the US presidential campaign.
It was passed to the US by an intelligence agency of one of the Baltic States. The CIA cannot act domestically against American citizens so a joint counter-intelligence taskforce was created.

That doesn’t answer when the FBI counterintelligence investigation began. When do you think it began?

[TSA]

its amazing that you cant just read the articles and are demanding other people to break it down for you :lol

it's not like you're being told to do the research. the research is given and you're just too lazy to gloss over it

I simply asked him for his opinion on when he thinks it started. I’m not going to speak for him.

[Pavlov]

One person who was briefed on Mr. Rosenstein’s conversation with the president said Mr. Trump had simply wanted Mr. Rosenstein to mention that he was not personally under investigation in the Russia inquiry. Mr. Rosenstein said it was unnecessary and did not include such a reference. Mr. Trump ultimately said it himself when announcing the firing.

:cry

1001962171776012289

They are going after Rosenstein now....IG release got em all shook.Uh, Rosenstein's memo did provide cover for Comey's firing. McCabe just figured it out before it actually happened. The right is going to go after Rosenstien.

You will be one of them.

[spurraider21]

That doesn’t answer when the FBI counterintelligence investigation began. When do you think it began?
i dont have any divine revealed wisdom tbh... i just know what the articles tell me

[TSA]

Uh, Rosenstein's memo did provide cover for Comey's firing. McCabe just figured it out before it actually happened. The right is going to go after Rosenstien.

You will be one of them.

:lmao

[Pavlov]

I simply asked him for his opinion on when he thinks it started. I’m not going to speak for him.I answered the question.

You didn't like the answer so you demanded I tell you what words are in the articles you just found out about today after a year and a half and still haven't read.

lol

[TSA]

i dont have any divine revealed wisdom tbh... i just know what the articles tell me

And do you believe that article? Or the dossier article? Or the drunken Papadopoulos article?

[spurraider21]

And do you believe that article? Or the dossier article? Or the drunken Papadopoulos article?
what is the dossier article you are referring to?

i think both journalists and readers alike should reserve the right to update opinions when new information is presented btw

[Pavlov]

TSA getting really mad at people who actually believe something now.

[TSA]

what is the dossier article you are referring to?

i think both journalists and readers alike should reserve the right to update opinions when new information is presented btw

So which event do you think started it tbh? There are three stories that have been pushed. They all can’t be true.

[spurraider21]

the bbc article says it started sometime around what, april 2016? the nyt article references the same investigation and says the FBI is leading the investigation. the mcclatchy article references the same investigation and says it started in spring of 2016

is that a good enough "general date" for you?

[spurraider21]

So which event do you think started it tbh? There are three stories that have been pushed. They all can’t be true.
what is the article you are referring to that says the dossier started the investigation?

[TSA]

the bbc article says it started sometime around what, april 2016? the nyt article references the same investigation and says the FBI is leading the investigation. the mcclatchy article references the same investigation and says it started in spring of 2016

is that a good enough "general date" for you?


Comey testified to it starting in July.

[Pavlov]

the bbc article says it started sometime around what, april 2016? the nyt article references the same investigation and says the FBI is leading the investigation. the mcclatchy article references the same investigation and says it started in spring of 2016

is that a good enough "general date" for you?I think he wants to bog everything down in semantics.

I don't understand why he demands to know every last detail of an ongoing FBI investigation, especially after begin completely ignorant of the task force story for 18 months.

[Pavlov]

Comey testified to it starting in July.Which would be after the time given for the task force in the articles.

Pretty simple.

[TSA]

I think he wants to bog everything down in semantics.

I don't understand why he demands to know every last detail of an ongoing FBI investigation, especially after begin completely ignorant of the task force story for 18 months.

I’m simply pointing out the changing narratives the media has pushed and trying to figure out which one you believe to be true.

[spurraider21]

Comey testified to it starting in July.
which is stated in the drunk papadopolous article, too

are you saying the FBI investigation that started in july is the same as the counterintelligence task force that was assembled during the spring?

im still waiting on the article that claims the dossier started the investigation, btw

[TSA]

I think he wants to bog everything down in semantics.

I don't understand why he demands to know every last detail of an ongoing FBI investigation, especially after begin completely ignorant of the task force story for 18 months.

Yes the difference between April and July is just semantics lol

[Pavlov]

I’m simply pointing out the changing narratives the media has pushed and trying to figure out which one you believe to be true.Not really. It's a pretty steady progression. You didn't read the articles so you don't even know what you're trying to talk about.

[Pavlov]

Yes the difference between April and July is just semantics lol:lol you really haven't read any of the articles.

[Pavlov]

are you saying the FBI investigation that started in july is the same as the counterintelligence task force that was assembled during the spring?This is precisely what he is trying to say after carefully not reading any of the articles he didn't know about for 18 months.

[spurraider21]

This is precisely what he is trying to say after carefully not reading any of the articles he didn't know about for 18 months.
i'm pretty sure i remember having this same discussion months ago, tbh

[TSA]

which is stated in the drunk papadopolous article, too

are you saying the FBI investigation that started in july is the same as the counterintelligence task force that was assembled during the spring?

im still waiting on the article that claims the dossier started the investigation, btw

I didn’t have a specific one in mind just the general dossier story that was pushed.

[Pavlov]

i'm pretty sure i remember having this same discussion months ago, tbh:lol you have a better memory than I. That would be completely insane if it was TSA.

[spurraider21]

I didn’t have a specific one in mind just the general dossier story that was pushed.
correct me if i'm wrong, but the only people who tried to push the "dossier is what launched the investigation" stuff was pro-trump conspiritards.

if i'm wrong, at least when it comes to people in this forum, please direct me to posts where people have made that claim.

[TSA]

i'm pretty sure i remember having this same discussion months ago, tbh

I don’t tbh

Tell me more about these two separate investigations into the Trump campaign and who the targets were.

[Pavlov]

I don’t tbh

Tell me more about these two separate investigations into the Trump campaign and who the targets were.
https://media1.tenor.com/images/c924b622b71a51d0c4aa21760c69b9f3/tenor.gif

[spurraider21]

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=272157&p=9280347&viewfull=1#post9280347

[Pavlov]

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=272157&p=9280347&viewfull=1#post9280347Well, we now know TSA will not read any articles spoon fed to him.

Twice.

lol

[Reck]

:lol


I'll be laughing all the way to the voting booth in 2020. Democrat Party is FUBAR.

And of course you're basing this off what exactly? Virginia? Pennsylvania? Alabama?

:lmao

[TSA]

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=272157&p=9280347&viewfull=1#post9280347

So there were no reported stories about this joint task force investigation until after the Steele dossier was released?

[TSA]

And of course you're basing this off what exactly? Virginia? Pennsylvania? Alabama?

:lmao

Don’t make spurraider21 pull up all your pre-election quotes :rollin

[Pavlov]

So there were no reported stories about this joint task force investigation until after the Steele dossier was released?Not that I have seen.

What is your conspiracy theory about that, TSA?

[spurraider21]

I didn’t have a specific one in mind just the general dossier story that was pushed.


correct me if i'm wrong, but the only people who tried to push the "dossier is what launched the investigation" stuff was pro-trump conspiritards.

if i'm wrong, at least when it comes to people in this forum, please direct me to posts where people have made that claim.

[Chris]

And of course you're basing this off what exactly? Virginia? Pennsylvania? Alabama?

:lmao

1.) Nuclear fallout exposed Liberals for being childish and sheepish.

2.) Chuck & Nancy. (no explanation needed)

3.) Kamala Harris. (only prominent "opponent" I have seen for Trump so far; Bernie Sanders may be running again but everyone knows he's a collectivist and the cat is out of the bag)

4.) The DNC went bankrupt. (:lmao)

5.) Trump has massive support and is winning over blue states simply by adhering to the Constitution.

6.) Trump goes around Media with Twitter. (will continue to do so; has a unique connection to Americans)

7.) The scandal is not going to go away any time soon. This is going to have a ripple effect on the DNC for years and years...

8.) HRC won't go away. She's the gift that keeps on giving and a reminder to vote for Trump in 2020. :lol

9.) lol rambling about random states (who knows what you're talking about?) (:lmao)

[TSA]

Not that I have seen.

What is your conspiracy theory about that, TSA?

Quite the coincidence don’t you think.

[TSA]

The Steele dossier theory fell apart, now the Mifsud/Papadapolous/Downer theory is falling apart....what will their next theory be?

The Maltese Phantom of Russiagate

In the shifting narratives of the Trump-Russia probe, a Maltese academic named Joseph Mifsud has remained a linchpin regarding claims of collusion. He is the professor who allegedly told Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos that the Russians had emails related to the Clinton campaign. The FBI says it opened its investigation in late July 2016 after Papadopoulos relayed that information to Australian diplomat Alexander Downer, and the Australians tipped off U.S. authorities.

While some news accounts describe Mifsud as an accomplice to Russian clandestine operations or a “cut-out” (intermediary), others contend he is a full-fledged Russian spy.

In an official report, Democrats on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence asserted that “in their approach to Papadopoulos, the Russians used common tradecraft and employed a cut-out,” a “Kremlin-linked…Maltese professor named Joseph Mifsud.”

No one in the American intelligence community has publicly challenged this description.

But there is one major problem with this story: No evidence has been presented to support the claim. Although Mifsud has traveled many times to Russia and has contacts with Russian academics, his closest public ties are to Western governments, politicians, and institutions, including the CIA, FBI and British intelligence services. One of Mifsud’s jobs has been to train diplomats, police officers, and intelligence officers at schools in London and Rome, where he lived and worked over the last dozen years.

The house-of-mirrors nature of the claim that Mifsud is a spy is reflected in the guilty plea Papadopoulos signed on Oct. 5, 2017 for making several material false statements to the FBI. It reads, in part: “Defendant PAPADOPOULOS further told the investigating agents that the professor was ‘a nothing’ and ‘just a guy talk[ing] up connections or something.’ In truth and in fact, however, defendant PAPADOPOULOS understood that the professor had substantial connections to Russian government officials (and had met with some of those officials in Moscow immediately prior to telling defendant PAPADOPOULOS about the ‘thousands of emails’) and, over a period of months, defendant PAPADOPOULOS repeatedly sought to use the professor's Russian connections in an effort to arrange a meeting between the Campaign and Russian government officials.”

If Mifsud truly is a Russian agent – which is key to the collusion narrative – he could prove to be one of the most promiscuous spies in modern history. Western intelligence agencies and European politicians would have to spend the next few decades repairing the damage he did to global security by infiltrating key institutions and personnel. As of yet, however, there is no indication that any intelligence service has begun the embarrassing, but highly important, assessment of how it was penetrated and how it can re-fortify the vulnerabilities that Mifsud may have exposed. There has been no public effort to arrest him.

While most media accounts have simply repeated official claims that Mifsud is a sketchy character whose visits to Russia and academic contacts suggest he is working for Russian intelligence, a look at the available evidence challenges that narrative. It also raises the possibility that Mifsud, whose circles are tied to the Clintons, may, like another professor recently in the news, Stefan Halper, have actually been working for Western intelligence agencies.
Disappearance

Painting a full picture of Mifsud is difficult because after the 58-year-old professor was first identified by name in a Washington Post article in the weeks following Papadopoulos’ confession, he gave a few interviews to the international press, and then disappeared.

Rumors circulated in the press that the Kremlin-linked professor may have been recalled to Russia or was liquidated.

A new book by former colleagues of Mifsud’s – Stephan Roh, a 50-year-old Swiss-German lawyer, and Thierry Pastor, a 35-year-old French political analyst – reports that he is alive and well. Their account includes a recent interview with him.

Their self-published book, “The Faking of Russia-gate: The Papadopoulos Case, an Investigative Analysis,” includes a recent interview with Mifsud in which he denies saying anything about Clinton emails to Papadopoulos. Mifsud, they write, stated “vehemently that he never told anything like this to George Papadopoulos.” Mifsud asked rhetorically: “From where should I have this [information]?”

Mifsud’s account seems to be supported by Alexander Downer, the Australian diplomat who alerted authorities about Papadopoulos. As reported in the Daily Caller, Downer said Papadopoulos never mentioned emails; he spoke, instead, about the Russians possessing material that could be damaging to Clinton. This new detail raises the possibility that Mifsud, Papadopoulos’ alleged source for the information, never said anything about Clinton-related emails either.

In interviews with RealClearInvestigations, Roh and Pastor said Mifsud is anything but a Russian spy. Rather, he is more likely a Western intelligence asset.

According to the two authors, it was a former Italian intelligence official, Vincenzo Scotti, a colleague of Mifsud’s and onetime interior minister, who told the professor to go into hiding. “I don’t know who was hiding him,” said Roh, “but I’m sure it was organized by someone. And I am sure it will be difficult to get to the bottom of it.”

Roh said Mifsud was afraid when he first went into hiding. “He had been moved to a place far away in Italy. In November and December, it broke him down. He was under so much pressure and cut off from the world. He had no internet or access to communications.”

Pastor and Roh, who hired Mifsud as a business development consultant in 2015, write that far from being a Russian spy, Mifsud “had only one master: the Western Political, Diplomatic and Intelligence World, his only home, of which he is still deeply dependent.”

There is plenty of open source material that supports their thesis.

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/05/26/the_maltese_phantom_of_russiagate_.html14

1001935211784032258

So was Mifsud a Western or Russian asset?

[Chris]

Porton Johnson was involved? :lol

[Chris]

Funny how this all comes back to M16 - British intelligence.

[Pavlov]

Quite the coincidence don’t you think.
Question pending:

What is your conspiracy theory about it?

[Reck]

Don’t make spurraider21 pull up all your pre-election quotes :rollin

What that Hillary was gonna win the election and a couple of states she should have won in the first place? Wow, call a historian. This one is for the books, TSA.

[Reck]

1.) Nuclear fallout exposed Liberals for being childish and sheepish.

2.) Chuck & Nancy. (no explanation needed)

3.) Kamala Harris. (only prominent "opponent" I have seen for Trump so far; Bernie Sanders may be running again but everyone knows he's a collectivist and the cat is out of the bag)

4.) The DNC went bankrupt. (:lmao)

5.) Trump has massive support and is winning over blue states simply by adhering to the Constitution.

6.) Trump goes around Media with Twitter. (will continue to do so; has a unique connection to Americans)

7.) The scandal is not going to go away any time soon. This is going to have a ripple effect on the DNC for years and years...

8.) HRC won't go away. She's the gift that keeps on giving and a reminder to vote for Trump in 2020. :lol

9.) lol rambling about random states (who knows what you're talking about?) (:lmao)

And yet, despite all that, they still won where they weren't supposed to.

:lmao Losing Alabama to a democrat. :lmao

[Winehole23]

:lmao Losing Alabama to a democrat. :lmaowho votes with Republicans most of the time. Doug Jones is no dummy.

[TSA]

Question pending:

What is your conspiracy theory about it?

I think it’s quite the coincidence that we didn’t hear about investigation 1 until the Steele dossier leaked. Until I see reporting on investigation 1 that occurred before the Steele dossier was released I’ll continue to think it’s quite the coincidence.

Do you think Mifsud was a Western or Russian asset?

[TSA]

Funny how this all comes back to M16 - British intelligence.

Funny how the head of GCHQ resigns days after Trump was sworn in.

[Pavlov]

I think it’s quite the coincidence that we didn’t hear about investigation 1 until the Steele dossier leaked. Until I see reporting on investigation 1 that occurred before the Steele dossier was released I’ll continue to think it’s quite the coincidence.Question pending: What is your conspiracy theory about this?


Do you think Mifsud was a Western or Russian asset?Russian. Maybe I'm wrong. I'll wait for someone not in the conspiracy ecosystem to say.

[TSA]

Question pending: What is your conspiracy theory about this?I just think it’s a strange coincidence that’s all.


Russian. Maybe I'm wrong. I'll wait for someone not in the conspiracy ecosystem to say.What leads you to believe he’s a Russian asset?

[TSA]

In interviews with RealClearInvestigations, Roh and Pastor said Mifsud is anything but a Russian spy. Rather, he is more likely a Western intelligence asset.

According to the two authors, it was a former Italian intelligence official, Vincenzo Scotti, a colleague of Mifsud’s and onetime interior minister, who told the professor to go into hiding. “I don’t know who was hiding him,” said Roh, “but I’m sure it was organized by someone. And I am sure it will be difficult to get to the bottom of it.”

Roh said Mifsud was afraid when he first went into hiding. “He had been moved to a place far away in Italy. In November and December, it broke him down. He was under so much pressure and cut off from the world. He had no internet or access to communications.”

Pastor and Roh, who hired Mifsud as a business development consultant in 2015, write that far from being a Russian spy, Mifsud “had only one master: the Western Political, Diplomatic and Intelligence World, his only home, of which he is still deeply dependent.”

There is plenty of open source material that supports their thesis.

[TSA]

In an official report, Democrats on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence asserted that “in their approach to Papadopoulos, the Russians used common tradecraft and employed a cut-out,” a “Kremlin-linked…Maltese professor named Joseph Mifsud.”

No one in the American intelligence community has publicly challenged this description.

But there is one major problem with this story: No evidence has been presented to support the claim. Although Mifsud has traveled many times to Russia and has contacts with Russian academics, his closest public ties are to Western governments, politicians, and institutions, including the CIA, FBI and British intelligence services. One of Mifsud’s jobs has been to train diplomats, police officers, and intelligence officers at schools in London and Rome, where he lived and worked over the last dozen years.

[TSA]

If Mifsud truly is a Russian agent – which is key to the collusion narrative – he could prove to be one of the most promiscuous spies in modern history. Western intelligence agencies and European politicians would have to spend the next few decades repairing the damage he did to global security by infiltrating key institutions and personnel. As of yet, however, there is no indication that any intelligence service has begun the embarrassing, but highly important, assessment of how it was penetrated and how it can re-fortify the vulnerabilities that Mifsud may have exposed. There has been no public effort to arrest him

[Pavlov]

I just think it’s a strange coincidence that’s all.I don't think it's a coincidence.


What leads you to believe he’s a Russian asset?Common sense. I could be wrong.

Why, in your own words, do you think he is a western asset?

EDIT: Oh, I see the conspiracy site beamed directly into your brain.

[Winehole23]

But there is one major problem with this story: No evidence has been presented to support the claim. that never stopped you, TSA.

there's nothing wrong with spitballing, just don't oversell it.

[Chris]

If Mifsud truly is a Russian agent – which is key to the collusion narrative – he could prove to be one of the most promiscuous spies in modern history. Western intelligence agencies and European politicians would have to spend the next few decades repairing the damage he did to global security by infiltrating key institutions and personnel.

This guy was trained by Putin the mastermind. Greatest spy of all times.

[TSA]

I don't think it's a coincidence.

Common sense. I could be wrong.

Why, in your own words, do you think he is a western asset?

EDIT: Oh, I see the conspiracy site beamed directly into your brain.

What sort of “common sense” leads you to believe he’s a Russian asset?

[Pavlov]

What sort of “common sense” leads you to believe he’s a Russian asset?My common sense.

If you want to convince me I'm wrong, do it with your own words

I'll read them.

[Chris]

My common sense.

If you want to convince me I'm wrong, do it with your own words

I'll read them.

You confused wishful thinking with common sense.

[TSA]

My common sense.

If you want to convince me I'm wrong, do it with your own words

I'll read them.
In my own words, like when I asked you for general dates you just linked 3 articles for me?

Here you go.

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/05/26/the_maltese_phantom_of_russiagate_.html

If you read that and still think Mifsud was a Russian asset you have no common sense.

[Pavlov]

You confused wishful thinking with common sense.Nah.


In my own words, like when I asked you for general dates you just linked 3 articles for me?

Here you go.

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/05/26/the_maltese_phantom_of_russiagate_.html

If you read that and still think Mifsud was a Russian asset you have no common sense.Those aren't your words.

You didn't read my dates the first time I posted them as a direct answer to your direct question, TSA.

Would you like to see them posted again?

lol

I won't pretend to read your conspiracy site.

[Chris]

Refuses to read articles but demands you read his. Typical Pavlov.

[Pavlov]

Refuses to read articles but demands you read his. Typical Pavlov.He never read the articles I posted twice.

Try to keep up.

[TSA]

Nah.

Those aren't your words.

You didn't read my dates the first time I posted them as a direct answer to your direct question, TSA.

Would you like to see them posted again?

lol

I won't pretend to read your conspiracy site.

You’ve been given the most comprehensive article ever written on Mifsud and you take the cowards way out and try to dismiss it because “conspiracy site”.

You’ve claimed to like to debunk conspiracy theories and on this one you just curled up in a ball and sucked your thumb.

[Pavlov]

You’ve been given the most comprehensive article ever written on Mifsud and you take the cowards way out and try to dismiss it because “conspiracy site”.

You’ve claimed to like to debunk conspiracy theories and on this one you just curled up in a ball and sucked your thumb.Put it in your words.

I'll read your take.

[dabom]

TSA posts Twittes but when called out in the future, says he never said those things. Just posting. At same time won't post his actually view points. :lol

What does he actually ever mean. :lol

[Pavlov]

TSA posts Twittes but when called out in the future, says he never said those things. Just posting. At same time won't post his actually view points. :lol

What does he actually ever mean. :lolWhatever it is, it's going to change as soon as someone tells him to change.

[TSA]

Gowdy gotcha again, TSA.

:lol Gowdy
:lol Pavlov
:lol djohn

Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) recently suggested the FBI did nothing wrong when it used at least one government informant to secretly collect information on Donald Trump’s presidential campaign. Public reports indicate, however, that Gowdy never even reviewed the relevant documents on the matter subpoenaed by Congress. In fact, a spokeswoman for Gowdy told The Federalist that the congressman doesn’t even know what documents and records were subpoenaed by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI).

http://thefederalist.com/2018/05/30/trey-gowdy-didnt-even-see-documents-he-claims-exonerate-fbi-on-spygate-reports/

[TSA]

Put it in your words.

I'll read your take.

Do you still think Mifsud is a Russian asset?

[Chris]

Gowdy speculation good enough for Hive Mind. :lol

[Pavlov]

:lol Gowdy
:lol Pavlov
:lol djohn

Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) recently suggested the FBI did nothing wrong when it used at least one government informant to secretly collect information on Donald Trump’s presidential campaign. Public reports indicate, however, that Gowdy never even reviewed the relevant documents on the matter subpoenaed by Congress. In fact, a spokeswoman for Gowdy told The Federalist that the congressman doesn’t even know what documents and records were subpoenaed by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI).

http://thefederalist.com/2018/05/30/trey-gowdy-didnt-even-see-documents-he-claims-exonerate-fbi-on-spygate-reports/The new theory is he doesn't even care enough to know what the committee is demanding and says the FBI acted properly based on all the things he does know?

I'll accept that tbh. Makes perfect sense.

[Pavlov]

Do you still think Mifsud is a Russian asset?I didn't see you put it in your words.

Put it in your own words. I'll read them.

[Pavlov]

Gowdy speculation good enough for Hive Mind. :lolGowdy's record as a prosecutor is good enough for me.

Is it not for you?

[TSA]

I didn't see you put it in your words.

Put it in your own words. I'll read them.

I already know you read it the first time I posted it so just cut the bullshit and answer. Do you still think Mifsud is a Russian asset?

[Pavlov]

I already know you read it the first time I posted it so just cut the bullshit and answer. Do you still think Mifsud is a Russian asset?Actually I didn't.

I don't lie like you do. Quit projecting.

Put it in your own words. I will read them.

[TSA]

Gowdy speculation good enough for Hive Mind. :lol

And Marco Rubio who wasn’t even invited:lol

During the CBS News interview, co-host Gayle King asked Gowdy if he had received any blowback from GOP lawmakers for his comments about the FBI’s behavior regarding the informant. Gowdy responded oddly, invoking Sens. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), neither of whom were invited to last week’s DOJ briefing.

[Pavlov]

And Marco Rubio who wasn’t even invited:lol

During the CBS News interview, co-host Gayle King asked Gowdy if he had received any blowback from GOP lawmakers for his comments about the FBI’s behavior regarding the informant. Gowdy responded oddly, invoking Sens. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), neither of whom were invited to last week’s DOJ briefing.Has anyone who went to the meeting claimed the FBI acted inappropriately due to what they found out during the meeting?

[TSA]

Actually I didn't.

I don't lie like you do. Quit projecting.

Put it in your own words. I will read them.


I don’t believe you.

[Chris]

Gowdy's record as a prosecutor is good enough for me.

Is it not for you?

Nah, I'm waiting on the IG report. I'm also not ready to throw Gowdy under the bus like Gorka and Levin.

Giuliani has an outstanding record as a prosecutor.

Is that not good enough for you?

[Chris]

And Marco Rubio who wasn’t even invited:lol

During the CBS News interview, co-host Gayle King asked Gowdy if he had received any blowback from GOP lawmakers for his comments about the FBI’s behavior regarding the informant. Gowdy responded oddly, invoking Sens. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), neither of whom were invited to last week’s DOJ briefing.

I have no idea what Gowdy is up to tbh

[Pavlov]

I don’t believe you.You don't believe anything.

You proved that today.

If you can't put it in your own words, fine. I'm not going to read your conspiracy links anymore. Too much of it has turned out to be complete bullshit.

[TSA]

Has anyone who went to the meeting claimed the FBI acted inappropriately due to what they found out during the meeting?

No one saw the documents that were subpoenaed dipshit. You jumped in the premature circle jerk with djohn and are now stuck playing cum cookie with him.

[Pavlov]

Nah, I'm waiting on the IG report. I'm also not ready to throw Gowdy under the bus like Gorka and Levin.

Giuliani has an outstanding record as a prosecutor.

Is that not good enough for you?He wasn't at the meeting.

[Pavlov]

No one saw the documents that were subpoenaed dipshit. You jumped in the premature circle jerk with djohn and are now stuck playing cum cookie with him.And yet, Gowdy made his declaration that no one has denounced.

It really happened.

You're stuck with a fantasy.

[TSA]

And yet, Gowdy made his declaration that no one has denounced.

It really happened.

You're stuck with a fantasy.you should know by now to never join djohn for a circle jerk

1000762124308766720

[Pavlov]

you should know by now to never join djohn for a circle jerk

1000762124308766720Changes nothing I said:


And yet, Gowdy made his declaration that no one has denounced.

It really happened.

You're stuck with a fantasy.

My interpretation is he doesn't give a shit about the documents and made his declaration based on everything he already knows.

You can give your interpretation if someone has told you what your interpretation should be.

[djohn2oo8]

My common sense.

If you want to convince me I'm wrong, do it with your own words

I'll read them.


And Marco Rubio who wasn’t even invited:lol

During the CBS News interview, co-host Gayle King asked Gowdy if he had received any blowback from GOP lawmakers for his comments about the FBI’s behavior regarding the informant. Gowdy responded oddly, invoking Sens. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), neither of whom were invited to last week’s DOJ briefing.

Seems mcConnell didnt say anything either :lol

PeeSA :lol

[djohn2oo8]

And I guess TSA doesn't remember that Lester Holt interview where Trump mentions Russa thing as why he fired Comey :lol

[DarrinS]

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/05/trump-campaign-spying-obama-administration-investigation/

[djohn2oo8]

Darrin with another non take

[Spurminator]

The article seems to imply that the FBI should have halted altogether on investigating Russian interference when it lead to people within the Trump campaign. Like they crossed a line somehow by following the trail into a Presidential Campaign. One would think most people would expect even more aggressive investigation once it reaches that threshold, but partisanship is a powerful thing.

Also :lol that is the most butthurt snark I've ever seen in a National Review column. I can see why Darrin likes it.

[Pavlov]

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/05/trump-campaign-spying-obama-administration-investigation/lol Are you as comically outraged as Andy pretends to be, Darrin?

[boutons_deux]

"we protect sources and methods."

Nunes? yeah right! :lol

[Pavlov]

The article seems to imply that the FBI should have halted altogether on investigating Russian interference when it lead to people within the Trump campaign. Like they crossed a line somehow by following the trail into a Presidential Campaign. One would think most people would expect even more aggressive investigation once it reaches that threshold, but partisanship is a powerful thing.

Also :lol that is the most butthurt snark I've ever seen in a National Review column. I can see why Darrin likes it.Dude is so mad that GOP leaders said his past year's work is bullshit. I'm surprised he didn't call them reptilians.

[TSA]

And I guess TSA doesn't remember that Lester Holt interview where Trump mentions Russa thing as why he fired Comey :lol

I remember it, you obviously don't. Here's the transcript.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/11/president_trumps_full_interview_with_lester_holt.h tml

Point me to where Trump mentions the Russia investigation as the reason he fired Comey.

[spurraider21]

I remember it, you obviously don't. Here's the transcript.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/11/president_trumps_full_interview_with_lester_holt.h tml

Point me to where Trump mentions the Russia investigation as the reason he fired Comey.
TRUMP: Oh, I was going to fire regardless of recommendation.

HOLT: So, there was...

(CROSSTALK)

TRUMP: They -- he made a recommendation. He's highly respected. Very good guy, very smart guy.

And the Democrats like him. The Republicans like him.

He had made a recommendation. But regardless of recommendation, I was going to fire Comey knowing there was no good time to do it

And in fact, when I decided to just do it, I said to myself -- I said, you know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story. It's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they should've won.

[Chucho]

I remember it, you obviously don't. Here's the transcript.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/11/president_trumps_full_interview_with_lester_holt.h tml

Point me to where Trump mentions the Russia investigation as the reason he fired Comey.



It's between Chris and djohn as the people who least understand the shit they repost and what they are dicated to think yet always rush to post a tweet or meme for an "I WIN!" moment but end up needing nut rags to clean their faces.

[djohn2oo8]

It's between Chris and djohn as the people who least understand the shit they repost and what they are dicated to think yet always rush to post a tweet or meme for an "I WIN!" moment but end up needing nut rags to clean their faces.

Read the post above dipshit. You know what, I'll point it out to you.

[djohn2oo8]

TRUMP: Oh, I was going to fire regardless of recommendation.

HOLT: So, there was...

(CROSSTALK)

TRUMP: They -- he made a recommendation. He's highly respected. Very good guy, very smart guy.

And the Democrats like him. The Republicans like him.

He had made a recommendation. But regardless of recommendation, I was going to fire Comey knowing there was no good time to do it

And in fact, when I decided to just do it, I said to myself -- I said, you know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story. It's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they should've won.

[DarrinS]

I’ll just put this here

https://amgreatness.com/2018/05/31/the-carnivores-of-civil-liberties/

[spurraider21]

I’ll just put this here
that's your mo

you just put stuff here, never comment on anything. just say muh russia and leave. it's all very interesting

[boutons_deux]

Trash signalling that all of Mueller's convicted can expect pardons
(https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/31/1768418/-Trump-announces-that-he-will-give-a-full-pardon-to-propagandist-and-felon-Dinesh-D-Souza)
Trump announces that he will give a full pardon to propagandist and felon Dinesh D’Souza (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/31/1768418/-Trump-announces-that-he-will-give-a-full-pardon-to-propagandist-and-felon-Dinesh-D-Souza)

https://images.dailykos.com/images/188942/story_image/9260267298_243dfdc4b1_k.jpg?1453963869

D’Souza pleaded guilty to multiple violations of campaign law (https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/newyork/news/press-releases/dinesh-dsouza-sentenced-in-manhattan-federal-court-to-five-years-of-probation-for-campaign-finance-fraud)in in 2014 after conducting a transparent scheme to funnel money to the campaign of Republican Senate candidate Wendy Long.

Long drew D’Souza’s love through her shared Islamophobia (https://www.syracuse.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/08/gop_senate_candidate_wendy_long_links_rising_crime _with_syracuse_mosque.html).

Using a series of straw donors, D’Souza handed money to one conservative pal after another, so they could pass it along to Long.

The action was so blatant that even Wendy Long became concerned.

And D’Souza went so far as lying to both the FBI and the candidate about the money he was pouring into her accounts.

Dinesh D’Souza is best known for his vile right-wing propaganda films and his even more vile political statements.

D’Souza has blamed progressives for causing 9/11 (https://www.salon.com/2007/01/20/d_souza_2),

blamed feminism for violence against women,

argued that the founders actually meant for America to be a Christian theocracy, and

wrote an entire book about how the Democratic Party came from Nazis.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/31/1768418/-Trump-announces-that-he-will-give-a-full-pardon-to-propagandist-and-felon-Dinesh-D-Souza (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/31/1768418/-Trump-announces-that-he-will-give-a-full-pardon-to-propagandist-and-felon-Dinesh-D-Souza)

iow, D'Souza is Trash's preferred kind of lying shitbag

[Chucho]

Read the post above dipshit. You know what, I'll point it out to you.


LOL, ignoring the entirety of a post for ONE time. You're incredibly stupid but, to your credit, I think you're aware of it. I'm unsure if that's a good thing or not. Regardless, you're a twit comparable to the other twits on the other side of the fence.

[TSA]

TRUMP: Oh, I was going to fire regardless of recommendation.

HOLT: So, there was...

(CROSSTALK)

TRUMP: They -- he made a recommendation. He's highly respected. Very good guy, very smart guy.

And the Democrats like him. The Republicans like him.

He had made a recommendation. But regardless of recommendation, I was going to fire Comey knowing there was no good time to do it

And in fact, when I decided to just do it, I said to myself -- I said, you know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story. It's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they should've won.

Why did you stop it there?

[Pavlov]

I’ll just put this here

https://amgreatness.com/2018/05/31/the-carnivores-of-civil-liberties/:lol Darrinspelledliketheblacksspellit

[spurraider21]

Why did you stop it there?


I remember it, you obviously don't. Here's the transcript.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/11/president_trumps_full_interview_with_lester_holt.h tml

Point me to where Trump mentions the Russia investigation as the reason he fired Comey.
because you asked me to point you to the specific part. do you want me to just copy/past the whole transcript?

[boutons_deux]

Trash also yucked it up with Russians in his office that he got rid of Comey

[spurraider21]

inb4 obama flexibility video

[Pavlov]

inb4 obama flexibility videoYep, that's why Obama fired Comey.

[Winehole23]

I’ll just put this here

https://amgreatness.com/2018/05/31/the-carnivores-of-civil-liberties/What were the highlights for you?

[Reck]

What were the highlights for you?

Oh this oughta be good. :downspin:

[DarrinS]

What were the highlights for you?




Why have the former guardians of civil liberties flipped in the near half-century since Watergate?

One, both the media and the liberal establishment believed that the outsider Trump represented an existential danger to themselves and the nation at large—similar to the way operatives in the Nixon Administration had felt about far-left presidential challenger George McGovern in 1972.

But this time around, liberals were not out of power as they were in 1972. Instead, they were the establishment. They held the reins of federal power under the Obama Administration. And they chose to exercise it in a fashion similar to how Nixon’s team had in 1972.

Second, pollsters and the media were convinced that Hillary Clinton would be elected. As a result, members of the FBI, CIA, and other federal bureaucracies apparently assumed that any extralegal efforts to stop the common menace Trump would be appreciated rather than punished by a soon-to-be President Clinton.

Three, those in the Obama Administration, the Clinton campaign, and the media formed an echo chamber. All convinced themselves that any means necessary to achieve the noble ends of precluding a Trump presidency were justified.

[Pavlov]

Yeah, you and Victor are pretty stupid.

This isn't anything like Watergate.