PDA

View Full Version : Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions



Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210

DisAsTerBot
12-13-2017, 10:59 PM
You just include me, because you know I make valid points and it irritates you.

:lol

TSA
12-13-2017, 11:05 PM
If Mueller somehow fucks this up...this is more giftwrapped than Roy Moore.

The OIG investigation results will be far more impactful and shocking than anything Mueller’s investigation could uncover.

Pavlov
12-13-2017, 11:07 PM
The OIG investigation results will be far more impactful and shocking than anything Mueller’s investigation could uncover.And what will those results be?

DarrinS
12-13-2017, 11:56 PM
People were talking about Russian favoritism for Trump and the possibility of collusion well before the dossier.


Can you point me to the people talking about it in or before July 2016?

spurraider21
12-13-2017, 11:58 PM
The unmasking investigation results will be far more impactful and shocking than anything Mueller’s investigation could uncover.
This shit again?

spurraider21
12-13-2017, 11:59 PM
Can you point me to the people talking about it in or before July 2016?
Dossier wasn’t publicly known about until after the election

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 12:06 AM
Can you point me to the people talking about it in or before July 2016?Manafort and Page raised eyebrows when they joined the campaign. Page had already been the subject of a FISA warrant.

Spurtacular
12-14-2017, 12:08 AM
Dossier wasn’t publicly known about until after the election

:lmao "Dossier"
:lmao Gimmick
:lmao Clinton supporters' tears

Spurminator
12-14-2017, 12:10 AM
Glad you shared your thoughts on this week’s revelations.

I don't know what revelations you're talking about but if it's one of your usual 4chan/Russia-pushed Clinton scandals, I'm not interested.

If it's the FBI text messages, I don't think personal opinions are relevant unless they're shown to affect the integrity of the work. I expect anyone with a working brain who is not also completely dishonest with themselves and others probably thinks Trump is unfit to be President, and has likely said so. If we're to staff the FBI only with people who don't have an opinion on Donald Trump as President, the bureau is going to be in pretty shit shape.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 12:11 AM
:lmao "Dossier"
:lmao Gimmick
:lmao Clinton supporters' tearsMan, you really never know what anyone is talking about.

Spurtacular
12-14-2017, 12:13 AM
:cry My tampon is overflowing today. :cry

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 12:14 AM
:lol Spurty's on a multi-thread meltdown.

Chris
12-14-2017, 12:17 AM
My tampon is overflowing today.

:lol

DarrinS
12-14-2017, 12:18 AM
Dossier wasn’t publicly known about until after the election


Precisely

Spurtacular
12-14-2017, 12:21 AM
I don't know what revelations you're talking about but if it's one of your usual 4chan/Russia-pushed Clinton scandals, I'm not interested.



https://i.ytimg.com/vi/KsZJKpbEoNE/hqdefault.jpg



:lmao

Spurminator
12-14-2017, 12:22 AM
Precisely

What led to the Dossier, Darrin?

DarrinS
12-14-2017, 12:23 AM
What led to the Dossier, Darrin?

Money

Spurminator
12-14-2017, 12:23 AM
Money

:rolleyes
What else?

DarrinS
12-14-2017, 12:26 AM
:rolleyes
What else?

You tell me

Spurminator
12-14-2017, 12:28 AM
You tell me

You can teach a man to fish, etc.

Do you believe that those who sought the information contained in the dossier chose Russia at random as the source of potentially compromising info?

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 12:29 AM
It's det dirt dirty Free Beacon money!

spurraider21
12-14-2017, 12:31 AM
What led to the Dossier, Darrin?
Soros

DarrinS
12-14-2017, 12:33 AM
You can teach a man to fish, etc.

Do you believe that those who sought the information contained in the dossier chose Russia at random as the source of potentially compromising info?


Nope. Chosen on purpose. Still oppo research financed by Hillary and DNC and likely used for FISA warrant to spy on Trump campaign.

Its amazing that someone like Trump, who can’t keep his mouth shut, has been so disciplined on his collusion activities.

DarrinS
12-14-2017, 12:36 AM
It's det dirt dirty Free Beacon money!

During primaries and non Russian related

Spurminator
12-14-2017, 12:37 AM
Nope. Chosen on purpose.

Chosen on purpose because the idea of Russia/Trump collusion was already out there. Thank you.


Still oppo research financed by Hillary and DNC and likely used for FISA warrant to spy on Trump campaign.

For info other than potential collusion?


Its amazing that someone like Trump, who can’t keep his mouth shut, has been so disciplined on his collusion activities.

Many would say he hasn't been disciplined at all, considering his many anti-sanction statements and general Putin knob-slobbing since the beginning of his campaign.

DarrinS
12-14-2017, 12:41 AM
Chosen on purpose because the idea of Russia/Trump collusion was already out there. Thank you.



Nope. The idea that Russians were bad actors and Trump wasn’t sufficiently “mean” to them was out there.


Keep Googling. I tried.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 12:43 AM
Nope. The idea that Russians were bad actors and Trump wasn’t sufficiently “mean” to them was out there.


Keep Googling. I tried.Well, the ad:lolption meeting took place on June 9. It's entirely possible one or more of the many Russians involved were already under surveillance by some party, somewhere, no?

DarrinS
12-14-2017, 12:46 AM
Well, the ad:lolption meeting took place on June 9. It's entirely possible one or more of the many Russians involved were already under surveillance by some party, somewhere, no?

Probably. Is that the same Russian lawyer who met with Fusion GPS founder both before and after her meeting with Jr..

Spurtacular
12-14-2017, 12:47 AM
:cry Turns out this is a nothingburger :cry

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 12:47 AM
Probably. Is that the same Russian lawyer who met with Fusion GPS founder both before and after her meeting with Jr..Yeah. What is your theory there, Darrin?

No need for TSA's questions three game.

DarrinS
12-14-2017, 12:50 AM
That loudmouth with no impulse control has amazing discipline when it comes to Russia tho. Maybe they have a hi res pic of his micropenis? :lmao

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 12:51 AM
That loudmouth with no impulse control has amazing discipline when it comes to Russia tho. Maybe they have a hi res pic of his micropenis? :lmaoHe has showed amazing discipline in dragging his feet with the new sanctions, I'll give him that.

DarrinS
12-14-2017, 12:52 AM
Yeah. What is your theory there, Darrin?

No need for TSA's questions three game.

Meeting wreaks of set up.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 12:53 AM
Meeting wreaks of set up.Walk me through the set up, Darrin. All the players and motives and methods.

DarrinS
12-14-2017, 12:55 AM
Walk me through the set up, Darrin. All the players and motives and methods.

Fusion GPS is just a ubiquitous swamp creature, I suppose.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 12:59 AM
Fusion GPS is just a ubiquitous swamp creature, I suppose.No need to be passive aggressive about it. Just say you won't make the effort.

Spurminator
12-14-2017, 01:07 AM
Nope. The idea that Russians were bad actors and Trump wasn’t sufficiently “mean” to them was out there.

:lol "wasn't sufficiently mean"

You're playing semantics because your point of view is impervious to reason. Trump was known to be cozy with Putin, and his Page/Manafort appointments along with his positions on Ukraine and the like were seen as oddly bold pro-Russia moves. Putin and his propaganda arms were openly pro-Trump, so the idea of collusion is a natural extension from all of those factors.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 03:09 AM
Nope. Chosen on purpose. Still oppo research financed by Hillary and DNC and likely used for FISA warrant to spy on Trump campaign.

Its amazing that someone like Trump, who can’t keep his mouth shut, has been so disciplined on his collusion activities.

Disciplined? There are reports that Trump was instructing the room to make up that shit about adoptions with the ambassador meeting they changed stories on 4 times. He has at least two people already flipping on him.

We don't have access so we cannot see what he actually did but Mueller is in position to get the skinny on that shit. You are just wishcasting.

You have no idea what the basis for the FISA warrant was.

DarrinS
12-14-2017, 09:45 AM
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2017-12-13%20CEG%20to%20DOJ%20(Strzok%20Page%20McCabe%20In surance%20Policy).pdf

boutons_deux
12-14-2017, 10:21 AM
Doubting the intelligence, Trump pursues Putin and leaves a Russian threat unchecked

In the final days before Donald Trump was sworn in as president, members of his inner circle pleaded with him to acknowledge publicly what U.S. intelligence agencies had already concluded — that Russia's interference in the 2016 election was real.

Holding impromptu interventions in Trump's 26th-floor corner office at Trump Tower, advisers — including Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and designated chief of staff, Reince Priebus — prodded the president-elect to accept the findings that the nation's spy chiefs had personally presented to him on Jan. 6.

They sought to convince Trump that he could affirm the validity of the intelligence without diminishing his electoral win, according to three officials involved in the sessions. More important, they said that doing so was the only way to put the matter behind him politically and free him to pursue his goal of closer ties with Russian President Vladi*mir Putin.

"This was part of the normalization process," one participant said. "There was a big effort to get him to be a standard president." :lol

But as aides persisted, Trump became agitated. He railed that the intelligence couldn't be trusted and scoffed at the suggestion that his candidacy had been propelled by forces other than his own strategy, message and charisma.

Told that members of his incoming Cabinet had already publicly backed the intelligence report on Russia, Trump shot back, "So what?"

"As far as hacking, I think it was Russia," he said, adding that "we also get hacked by other countries and other people."

As hedged as those words were, Trump regretted them almost immediately. "It's not me," he said to aides afterward. "It wasn't right."

the personal insecurities of the president — and his refusal to accept what even many in his administration regard as objective reality — have impaired the government's response to a national security threat. The repercussions radiate across the government.

Trump has waged his own campaign to discredit the case that Russia poses any threat and he has resisted or attempted to roll back efforts to hold Moscow to account.

when Congress moved to impose additional penalties on Moscow, Trump opposed the measures fiercely.

"What the president has to say is, 'We know the Russians did it, they know they did it, I know they did it, and we will not rest until we learn everything there is to know about how and do everything possible to prevent it from happening again,' " Hayden said in an interview.

Trump "has never said anything close to that and will never say anything close to that."

'More than worth the effort'

The feeble American response has registered with the Kremlin.

U.S. officials said that a stream of intelligence from sources inside the Russian government indicates that Putin and his lieutenants regard the 2016 "active measures" campaign — as the Russians describe such covert propaganda operations — as a resounding, if incomplete, success.

But overall, U.S. officials said, the Kremlin believes it got a staggering return on an operation that by some estimates cost less than $500,000 to execute and was organized around two main objectives — destabilizing U.S. democracy and preventing Hillary Clinton, who is despised by Putin, from reaching the White House.

The bottom line for Putin, said one U.S. official briefed on the stream of post-election intelligence, is that the operation was "more than worth the effort."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/doubting-the-intelligence-trump-pursues-putin-and-leaves-a-russian-threat-unchecked/ar-BBGJ75h

DaughterFucker-in-chief is totally compromised by Pootin, will probably fire Mueller and be impeached/convicted for the firing, rather than let Mueller make his case and be impeached/convicted on that case.

TSA
12-14-2017, 10:34 AM
Disciplined? There are reports that Trump was instructing the room to make up that shit about adoptions with the ambassador meeting they changed stories on 4 times. He has at least two people already flipping on him.

We don't have access so we cannot see what he actually did but Mueller is in position to get the skinny on that shit. You are just wishcasting.

You have no idea what the basis for the FISA warrant was.

:lol

TSA
12-14-2017, 10:36 AM
T7S9t4o9HC0
"We Have Proof DOJ Worked Against Republican Party During Election"

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 10:39 AM
:lol second special counsel.

boutons_deux
12-14-2017, 10:42 AM
T7S9t4o9HC0
"We Have Proof DOJ Worked Against Republican Party During Election"

link to the "proof"?

Dobbs is nuttier with every year. Frontal lobes shrinking

boutons_deux
12-14-2017, 10:59 AM
‘Show your text messages during Benghazi’: Morning Joe rips GOP ‘jackasses’ undermining Mueller

MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough hammered House Republicans who “snarled” at deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein as part of the broader effort to undermine — and then fire — special counsel Robert Mueller.

The “Morning Joe” host said Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) and other GOP members of the House Judiciary Committee had embarrassed themselves during Wednesday’s hearing by obsessing over anti-Trump texts sent by an FBI agent fired by Mueller last summer.

“By the way, I’d love to see these guys’ text messages during their hearings,” Scarborough said.

“You guys want to play that game?

Show your text messages during Benghazi, show your texts.

Why don’t you reveal your tech messages and what you were texting each other while you were conducting an impartial investigation of Benghazi for, like, eight years?”

“If you’re trying to disrupt Bob Mueller’s investigation that has already brought down three or four people extraordinarily close to the president of the United States,

you’re making a fool of yourself,” Scarborough said.

“You’re trying to undermine the rule of law.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/show-your-text-messages-during-benghazi-morning-joe-rips-gop-jackasses-undermining-mueller/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29 (https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/show-your-text-messages-during-benghazi-morning-joe-rips-gop-jackasses-undermining-mueller/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29)

For Repugs, oligarchy-fellating politics overrides any and all laws, regs, conventions.

All Oligarchy Politic$, All The Time.

TSA
12-14-2017, 11:09 AM
djohn2oo8 :rollin

Read the Letter That Cummings Sent on Flynn Whistle-Blower
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/12/06/us/politics/document-Gowdy-Flynn-Letter.html

Congressional Street Thug Elijah Cummings Gets Snagged Fabricating Trump Hoax
http://truepundit.com/busted-congressional-street-thug-elijah-cummings-gets-snagged-fabricating-trump-hoax-video/

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 11:11 AM
lol "Street Thug" code words

Subtle, TSA.

boutons_deux
12-14-2017, 11:23 AM
Judiciary Dem Issues Dire Warning: GOP Is Plotting To Let Trump Fire Mueller

An increasing number of Republicans are making it plain that any attempt by Trump to fire Mueller would be fine with them.

That was the undeniable take-away (https://twitter.com/jimsciutto/status/940986569523126273) from the House Judiciary Committee’s Wednesday hearing. During his testimony, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein was pressured relentlessly (https://twitter.com/DavidCornDC/status/940986439017394176) by Republicans who used to be pro-law and order but now

use the FBI and the DOJ as a political punching bag.

Why?

Because they want the Mueller investigation shut down. Period.
After listening to hours of the GOP’s bashing, Rep. Eric Swawell (D-CA) warned that

Republicans were signaling to the White House that they would OK with Trump trying to obstruct justice

http://www.nationalmemo.com/judiciary-dem-issues-dire-warning-gop-plotting-let-trump-fire-mueller/ (http://www.nationalmemo.com/judiciary-dem-issues-dire-warning-gop-plotting-let-trump-fire-mueller/)

yep, Repugs would not impeach AND convict Trash for shutting down Mueller

Would Repugs get then screwed in 2018, or any, elections? Probably not.

Repugs can count on 40% - 45% of voters no matter WHAT THE FUCK the Repugs do.

boutons_deux
12-14-2017, 11:57 AM
Conservatives want the FBI demolished — to protect Donald Trump

Another conservative speaks up, and echoes the refrain that the FBI is not pro-Trump enough for his taste

Fox News is actively encouraging President Donald Trump to behave like a tyrant.

On Wednesday, the network invited Tom Fitton, president of the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch — known for promoting endless scandals in the Obama administration (including Hillary Clinton's emails) — suggested that the FBI is tainted, and perhaps should be culled.

"Forget about the FBI investigation into Clinton and Trump being compromised by these conflicts.

I think the FBI has been compromised.

Forget about shutting down Mr. Mueller.

Do we need to shut down the FBI because

it was turned into a KGB-type operation by the Obama administration?" Fitton said. :lol

Fitton is just the latest conservative to abandon the "law and order"

priority, instead

encouraging the president to thwart an investigation into his potentially illegal activities.

Last week Fox News’ Judge Jeanine Pirro called for a "cleansing (https://www.salon.com/2017/12/10/its-time-to-take-them-out-in-cuffs-foxs-jeanine-pirro-calls-for-a-purge-of-the-fbi/)" of law enforcement officials who are investigating the president.

"There is a cleansing needed in our FBI and Department of Justice — it needs to be cleansed of individuals who should not just be fired, but who need to be taken out in cuffs!" Pirro proclaimed.

https://www.salon.com/2017/12/14/conservatives-want-the-fbi-demolished-to-protect-donald-trump/

More rightwingnutjob hate media signalling to Trash that it's OK to shut Mueller down.,

TSA
12-14-2017, 12:12 PM
lol "Street Thug" code words

Subtle, TSA.

I didn’t title the article. No comment on the actions of Cummings?

Spurminator
12-14-2017, 12:20 PM
I didn’t title the article. No comment on the actions of Cummings?

Did you read the article? Where is there any evidence of fabrication by Cummings? It's a Fox News video questioning the whistleblower's credibility, with the following commentary added by the TruePundit writer (in its entirety):


Add another lie onto the long career list of Congressman Elijah Cummings’ political falsehoods and con jobs.

This one is a doozy.


What a gig. Lie and get paid well for it while your constituents live in squalor and poverty.


Only in America can a gutter snipe like Cummings make it to Congress.


Thug life.

LOL the shit you try to pass off to intelligent people.
LOL "BUSTED"

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 12:23 PM
I didn’t title the article.You chose to spread it.
No comment on the actions of Cummings?Honestly, I can't get past your racist dog whistles, TSA. Maybe you could find some source that isn't a piece of shit.

Spurminator
12-14-2017, 12:28 PM
I do agree with the commentary on the Fox News video that people tend to believe what they want to believe, which explains why someone would share an article titled "BUSTED: Congressional Street Thug Elijah Cummings Gets Snagged Fabricating Trump Hoax" despite it showing no such thing.

It took two minutes to watch the video and read the article. Shame TSA doesn't have that kind of spare time in between posting dishonest articles written by terrible people.

TSA
12-14-2017, 12:54 PM
I do agree with the commentary on the Fox News video that people tend to believe what they want to believe, which explains why someone would share an article titled "BUSTED: Congressional Street Thug Elijah Cummings Gets Snagged Fabricating Trump Hoax" despite it showing no such thing.

It took two minutes to watch the video and read the article. Shame TSA doesn't have that kind of spare time in between posting dishonest articles written by terrible people.

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000160-4678-d668-ab6e-dfff6bf60001

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 12:56 PM
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000160-4678-d668-ab6e-dfff6bf60001Yes, that is your "street thug's" letter. Where is the part where the "gutter snipe" is busted?

Spurminator
12-14-2017, 12:57 PM
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000160-4678-d668-ab6e-dfff6bf60001

Again, disputing the claims of the whistleblower.

Where does anyone accuse or provide evidence that Cummings fabricated the whistleblower story? What "actions of Cummings," as you put it, are being protested here?

TSA
12-14-2017, 12:59 PM
Yes, that is your "street thug's" letter. Where is the part where the "gutter snipe" is busted?

That isn't Cummings letter

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 01:02 PM
That isn't Cummings letterRead it.


See nothing about fabrication.

Spurminator
12-14-2017, 01:06 PM
Meanwhile, the White House is still holding Flynn documents that have been requested by the Congressional committee since March but who are we to mistrust them?

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 01:10 PM
Now it's entirely possible that the whistleblower fabricated the story, but he's probably white and can't be called a street thug by TSA.

It's cool that ACU got the phone records for a phone -- but there's nothing to say that is the phone the whistleblower saw.

TSA
12-14-2017, 01:12 PM
Now it's entirely possible that the whistleblower fabricated the story, but he's probably white and can't be called a street thug by TSA.

It's cool that ACU got the phone records for a phone -- but there's nothing to say that is the phone the whistleblower saw.

It's also entirely possible there is no whistleblower.

Spurminator
12-14-2017, 01:14 PM
It's also entirely possible there is no whistleblower.

"BUSTED"
"THE ACTIONS OF CUMMINGS"
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(It's entirely possible)

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 01:14 PM
It's also entirely possible there is no whistleblower.Because Cummings is a street thug.

You did read all of Cummings' letter, did you not?

Spurminator
12-14-2017, 01:17 PM
It's also entirely possible that people have more than one phone, since we're speculating wildly with absolutely no evidence of anything.

TSA
12-14-2017, 01:19 PM
It's also entirely possible that people have more than one phone, since we're speculating wildly with absolutely no evidence of anything.

:lol you have more posts on this subject than the Strzok texts

TSA
12-14-2017, 01:20 PM
941245161153159168

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 01:22 PM
941245161153159168What are the new details, TSA? It looks like the same stuff you've been posting.

Spurminator
12-14-2017, 01:26 PM
:lol you have more posts on this subject than the Strzok texts

I posted about the texts. No one responded, so I didn't post again about them. That's typically how this works.

Meanwhile, on this subject you seem to be having a more difficult time getting the point. Or you're just more stubbornly committed to the lie you're soldiering for today. Either way, that usually leads to more posts.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 01:26 PM
I posted about the texts. No one responded, so I didn't post again about them. That's typically how this works.

Meanwhile, on this subject you seem to be having a more difficult time getting the point. Or you're just more stubbornly committed to the lie you're soldiering for today. Either way, that usually leads to more posts.His point is Cummings is a street thug gutter snipe whose letter he did not read.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 01:31 PM
It's also entirely possible that people have more than one phone, since we're speculating wildly with absolutely no evidence of anything.

That is just what conspiratards do.

TSA
12-14-2017, 01:39 PM
I posted about the texts. No one responded, so I didn't post again about them. That's typically how this works.

Meanwhile, on this subject you seem to be having a more difficult time getting the point. Or you're just more stubbornly committed to the lie you're soldiering for today. Either way, that usually leads to more posts.

I believe Cummings or the whistleblower fabricated the story.

I must have missed your posts on the Strzok texts yesterday.

941342605467668481

TSA
12-14-2017, 01:42 PM
941349568708521985

TSA
12-14-2017, 01:42 PM
941342605467668481

Q:
follow the wives
these people are stupid!

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 01:45 PM
:lol Q

Spurminator
12-14-2017, 01:47 PM
I believe Cummings or the whistleblower fabricated the story.

So, not "Busted" then. Glad we've settled that.


I must have missed your posts on the Strzok texts yesterday.

You asked for my thoughts and I responded.

I'll add that it's textbook selective speculation. An FBI agent is found to have texted messages that indicate he did not want Trump to be President (something that was true for about 60% of the country in 2016), and is subsequently removed from Mueller's investigation team.... That must mean the entire investigation is compromised and Mueller must be fired!

At the same time, several members of Trump's team have been charged or forced out due to questions about cooperation with Russia, the White House is withholding evidence, and Donald Trump is the first President in modern history to refuse to release his tax reports.... Nothing to see here!

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 01:49 PM
Why is TSA repeating the exact same thing from multiple sources?

Spurminator
12-14-2017, 01:50 PM
941342605467668481


941349568708521985

This is the same person who wrote the "article" you shared that claimed Cummings was "Busted." The headline he wrote was a lie that manipulated you into believing something that was not supported anywhere in the article, causing you to share the article and shame yourself even further than you already have in the past two years.

You should be embarrassed that you fell for it and you should be resentful that this person mislead you like that. Instead, you're continuing to amplify his content. Why would you do that?

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 01:51 PM
This is the same person who wrote the "article" you shared that claimed Cummings was "Busted." The headline of that article was a lie that manipulated you into believing something that was not supported anywhere in the article.

You should be embarrassed that you fell for it and you should be resentful that this person mislead you like that. Instead, you're continuing to amplify his content. Why would you do that?Investigative Bureau is my favorite writer.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 02:06 PM
And remember TSA is totes against leaks, which is why he's demanding to know why Fox News got 2600% more texts then Congress and why all the private texts would need to be released at all.

He's a true, unbiased patriot.

boutons_deux
12-14-2017, 03:09 PM
Fox / Repugs OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE

Trump super PAC quietly launches new ad campaign targeting Special Counsel Robert Mueller

A PAC call center staffer told ThinkProgress the group believes Mueller should be fired.

https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Tomi-Lahren-scare-quotes-screencap-800x430.png

https://thinkprogress.org/trump-pac-mueller-2e51b395d246/

Repugs are signalling to Trash, who will be emboldened by the tax cut scam, that he can have his Saturday Night Massacre so he should go searching for his Robert Bork.

TSA
12-14-2017, 03:10 PM
And remember TSA is totes against leaks, which is why he's demanding to know why Fox News got 2600% more texts then Congress and why all the private texts would need to be released at all.

He's a true, unbiased patriot.

Those texts were made on government issued phones, there’s nothing private about them.

TSA
12-14-2017, 03:11 PM
Strzok’s Texts And The Clinton-Trump Investigations — A Definitive Timeline
http://amp.dailycaller.com/2017/12/14/strzoks-texts-and-the-clinton-trump-investigations-a-definitive-timeline/

spurraider21
12-14-2017, 03:13 PM
investigation ongoing... but the tarmac!
investigation ongoing... but the unmasking!
investigation ongoing... but the texts!

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 03:31 PM
Those texts were made on government issued phones, there’s nothing private about them.Oh, every text on every government issued phone is automatically available to Fox News?

I'm going to have to ask you for a link to that regulation, TSA.

Thanks in advance.

djohn2oo8
12-14-2017, 03:36 PM
Oh, every text on every government issued phone is automatically available to Fox News?

I'm going to have to ask you for a link to that regulation, TSA.

Thanks in advance.

:lol

boutons_deux
12-14-2017, 03:42 PM
Those texts were made on government issued phones, there’s nothing private about them.

So let's respond to Mornging Joe's request to see all the texts between Repug members of the 8 Benghazi committees.

TSA
12-14-2017, 03:49 PM
And remember TSA is totes against leaks, which is why he's demanding to know why Fox News got 2600% more texts then Congress and why all the private texts would need to be released at all.

He's a true, unbiased patriot.

You might want to research the "10,000" texts you keep claiming Fox news acquired :rollin

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 04:02 PM
You might want to research the "10,000" texts you keep claiming Fox news acquired :rollinIf it's wrong I'll accept falling for the conservative fake news sites that claimed it.

You got that regulation yet? I'd love to see all the Trump administration's texts since they're readily available to me according to you.

TSA
12-14-2017, 04:09 PM
The best part of all these texts coming out is that it is the fault of the Democrats for calling on the OIG to investigate how Clinton's email investigation was handled.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 04:10 PM
The best part of all these texts coming out is that it is the fault of the Democrats for calling on the OIG to investigate how Clinton's email investigation was handled.I'm fine with it. You're the one who wants the Mueller investigation to be stopped.

Don't even try to deny it.

TSA
12-14-2017, 04:12 PM
If it's wrong I'll accept falling for the conservative fake news sites that claimed it.

You got that regulation yet? I'd love to see all the Trump administration's texts since they're readily available to me according to you.

That wasn't "according" to me, you just made it up.

TSA
12-14-2017, 04:13 PM
I'm fine with it. You're the one who wants the Mueller investigation to be stopped.

Don't even try to deny it.Here you go again just making shit up.

Find one post of me saying the Mueller investigation should be shut down. Happy hunting.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 04:14 PM
That wasn't "according" to me, you just made it up.Oh, so they're not readily available?

Look, you act like you know all the regulations surrounding government issued phones -- so spit them out.

Educate us on all the pertinent regulations in this case.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 04:14 PM
Here you go again just making shit up.

Find one post of me saying the Mueller investigation should be shut down. Happy hunting.See, this is you not denying it.

You want the Mueller investigation shut down. All you are doing is parroting every right wing talking point that is aimed at increasing public acceptance of a Mueller firing.

If you can't see that, you're an idiot.

TSA
12-14-2017, 04:15 PM
Oh, so they're not readily available?

Look, you act like you know all the regulations surrounding government issued phones -- so spit them out.

Educate us on all the pertinent regulations in this case.

I never said they were readily available. You just keep making shit up.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 04:16 PM
I never said they were readily available. You just keep making shit up.What are you saying, TSA?

Give us the regulations.

spurraider21
12-14-2017, 04:16 PM
And remember TSA is totes against leaks, which is why he's demanding to know why Fox News got 2600% more texts then Congress and why all the private texts would need to be released at all.

He's a true, unbiased patriot.


Those texts were made on government issued phones, there’s nothing private about them.
explain what this comment meant, then

TSA
12-14-2017, 04:17 PM
See, this is you not denying it.

You want the Mueller investigation shut down.

I don't need to deny something I've never said. Back your claim up, find a single post of me saying I want the Mueller investigation shut down.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 04:18 PM
I don't need to deny something I've never said. Back your claim up, find a single post of me saying I want the Mueller investigation shut down.This is you not denying it.

Just say "I don't want the Mueller investigation shut down. I want it to run its course and conclude without any outside interference."

I'll believe you.

spurraider21
12-14-2017, 04:19 PM
I don't need to deny something I've never said. Back your claim up, find a single post of me saying I want the Mueller investigation shut down.
It's the equivalent of how you've never actually said hillary and podestas engage in child trafficking despite making a million posts consistent with the conspiracy theory that hillary and podestas engage in child trafficking

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 04:19 PM
It's the equivalent of how you've never actually said hillary and podestas engage in child trafficking despite making a million posts consistent with the conspiracy theory that hillary and podestas engage in child traffickingARE YOU DENYING BILL CLINTON GOT LAURA SILSBY OUT OF HAITI??????!!!!!1111?!!111!

TSA
12-14-2017, 04:21 PM
explain what this comment meant, then

Government can access information on government issued phones whenever they please.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 04:22 PM
Government can access information on government issued phones whenever they please.Where is that regulation, TSA?

I need to see a link.

spurraider21
12-14-2017, 04:24 PM
And remember TSA is totes against leaks, which is why he's demanding to know why Fox News got 2600% more texts then Congress and why all the private texts would need to be released at all.

He's a true, unbiased patriot.


Those texts were made on government issued phones, there’s nothing private about them.
when asked to explain...

Government can access information on government issued phones whenever they please.
no, that was a response to how Fox News got access, not "the government"

TSA
12-14-2017, 04:27 PM
It's the equivalent of how you've never actually said hillary and podestas engage in child trafficking despite making a million posts consistent with the conspiracy theory that hillary and podestas engage in child trafficking

I've never even alluded to wanting it shut down, quite the opposite.

TSA
12-14-2017, 04:30 PM
when asked to explain...

no, that was a response to how Fox News got access, not "the government"

Fox News was invited by the government to see the texts, just like many other news outlets were. Chumpdumper was outraged over something that never happened.

TSA
12-14-2017, 04:31 PM
This is you not denying it.

Just say "I don't want the Mueller investigation shut down. I want it to run its course and conclude without any outside interference."

I'll believe you.

This is you failing to back your claim.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 04:32 PM
Fox News was invited by the government to see the texts, just like many other news outlets were. Chumpdumper was outraged over something that never happened.And why did they do that?

"I think it's wrong that their texts have been massively released to the public. I do think they should have been vetted so that only stuff that was relevant to whether there was bias in Mueller's investigation was sent to Congress. Congress is entitled to look at that, just as Mueller was entitled to look at that. But in an investigation, the public usually doesn't have a right to know about this until charges are brought."

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 04:33 PM
This is you failing to back your claim.My claim is you won't just say "I don't want the Mueller investigation shut down. I want it to run its course and conclude without any outside interference."

At this point, it is completely backed up.

TSA
12-14-2017, 04:40 PM
And why did they do that?

"I think it's wrong that their texts have been massively released to the public. I do think they should have been vetted so that only stuff that was relevant to whether there was bias in Mueller's investigation was sent to Congress. Congress is entitled to look at that, just as Mueller was entitled to look at that. But in an investigation, the public usually doesn't have a right to know about this until charges are brought."

I'd guess it had something to do with Mueller hiding the reason for Strzok being removed from Mueller's team from congress for four months.

DarrinS
12-14-2017, 04:40 PM
And remember TSA is totes against leaks, which is why he's demanding to know why Fox News got 2600% more texts then Congress and why all the private texts would need to be released at all.

He's a true, unbiased patriot.



Does Fox actually have 10k text messages in their possession?

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 04:41 PM
I'd guess it had something to do with Mueller hiding the reason for Strzok being removed from Mueller's team from congress for four months.Oh, is that another rule you made up?

TSA
12-14-2017, 04:41 PM
My claim is you won't just say "I don't want the Mueller investigation shut down. I want it to run its course and conclude without any outside interference."

At this point, it is completely backed up.

No, this is your claim.


You're the one who wants the Mueller investigation to be stopped.

And you won't even attempt to back it up.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 04:42 PM
Does Fox actually have 10k text messages in their possession?Doesn't look like it. Serves me right for believing TSA's sauces.

TSA
12-14-2017, 04:42 PM
Oh, is that another rule you made up?

wtf are you even on about now?

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 04:44 PM
No, this is your claim.



And you won't even attempt to back it up.You're backing it up for me.

Thanks. This gets easier every day.

All you have to do to totally shut me down is to post the following as your own: "I don't want the Mueller investigation shut down. I want it to run its course and conclude without any outside interference."

You won't do it. You will not commit to that because you know that you will call for the investigation to be shut down.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 04:45 PM
wtf are you even on about now?There's now a rule that the texts must be released since Mueller didn't want them released?

Reck
12-14-2017, 04:47 PM
I've never even alluded to wanting it shut down, quite the opposite.

Nah, you did.

Your problem is that you think you're substantially smarter than everyone here.

Cant be bothered to look it up now but you said Flynn purposefully pleaded guilty so he can infiltrate and target the Mueller team so he can exposed them all.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 04:49 PM
Nah, you did.

Your problem is that you think you're substantially smarter than everyone here.

Cant be bothered to look it up now but you said Flynn purposefully pleaded guilty so he can infiltrate and target the Mueller team so he can exposed them all.:lol I've never seen someone so completely manipulated by right wing/alt right media who thought he was figuring it all out by himself.

TSA
12-14-2017, 04:51 PM
Nah, you did.

Your problem is that you think you're substantially smarter than everyone here.

Cant be bothered to look it up now but you said Flynn purposefully pleaded guilty so he can infiltrate and target the Mueller team so he can exposed them all.

Nope. Never said I wanted the Mueller investigation shut down, quite the opposite. I'll challenge you as well to find a single post of me ever calling for the Mueller investigation to be shut down. Happy hunting.

TSA
12-14-2017, 04:54 PM
You're backing it up for me.

Thanks. This gets easier every day.

All you have to do to totally shut me down is to post the following as your own: "I don't want the Mueller investigation shut down. I want it to run its course and conclude without any outside interference."

You won't do it. You will not commit to that because you know that you will call for the investigation to be shut down.

I've already shut you down, you've completely abandoned backing your claim up by providing a single post from me calling for the investigation to be shut down. I've posted quite the opposite here multiple times but you are too lazy to even look.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 04:58 PM
I've already shut you down, you've completely abandoned backing your claim up by providing a single post from me calling for the investigation to be shut down. I've posted quite the opposite here multiple times but you are too lazy to even look.No, you want it shut down. You just have to post the same story enough times to justify your declaration. It's the right wing playbook.

The fact you won't say this -- "I don't want the Mueller investigation shut down. I want it to run its course and conclude without any outside interference" -- when you have every chance to is all the proof I will ever need.

Prove me wrong. Say this -- "I don't want the Mueller investigation shut down. I want it to run its course and conclude without any outside interference" -- for yourself.

Take a real stand for once.

TSA
12-14-2017, 05:00 PM
No, you want it shut down. You just have to post the same story enough times to justify your declaration. It's the right wing playbook.

The fact you won't say this -- "I don't want the Mueller investigation shut down. I want it to run its course and conclude without any outside interference" -- when you have every chance to is all the proof I will ever need.

Prove me wrong. Say this -- "I don't want the Mueller investigation shut down. I want it to run its course and conclude without any outside interference" -- for yourself.

Take a real stand for once.

You look really pathetic when you beg like this.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 05:01 PM
You look really pathetic when you beg like this.It's a challenge.

And you won't do it. You'll just get angry and more personal now. It's your playbook.

TSA
12-14-2017, 05:05 PM
It's a challenge.

And you won't do it. You'll just get angry and more personal now. It's your playbook.


You're the one who wants the Mueller investigation to be stopped.

No, this was the challenge


Find one post of me saying the Mueller investigation should be shut down.

And you won't do it. You'll instead just keep begging.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 05:11 PM
No, this was the challenge



And you won't do it. You'll instead just keep begging.I don't have to look up old posts. This is what you're doing now. You're repeating the same talking point over and over just like the whole of the right wing media. Their goal is to increase public acceptance of a shutdown of Mueller's investigation, and their goal is your goal.

You might not even know it yet -- but since you won't commit to explicitly supporting Mueller's doing his job to completion without outside interference, you probably do and are just too embarrassed to admit it at this point.

"I don't want the Mueller investigation shut down. I want it to run its course and conclude without any outside interference"

My challenge stands. It's all you have to do to completely shut me up about it and you won't do it.

Reck
12-14-2017, 05:11 PM
Nope. Never said I wanted the Mueller investigation shut down, quite the opposite. I'll challenge you as well to find a single post of me ever calling for the Mueller investigation to be shut down. Happy hunting.

You like to play word games, dont you?

You dont have to flat out say it in that manner to want Mueller's team shut down.

By saying stuff like Flynn has flipped on purpose to be able to target and then get Mueller and his team and that its a Trump/NSA vs FBI/CIA, what exactly do you think you're saying? Who exactly do you think Mueller works for if not the FBI?

Those are your own words. :lol

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 05:35 PM
You like to play word games, dont you?

You dont have to flat out say it in that manner to want Mueller's team shut down.

By saying stuff like Flynn has flipped on purpose to be able to target and then get Mueller and his team and that its a Trump/NSA vs FBI/CIA, what exactly do you think you're saying? Who exactly do you think Mueller works for if not the FBI?

Those are your own words. :lol

He started off saying that Susan Rice and HRC were the ones going to be indicted and the Russia thing was a big nothingburger. I don't see why you guys feel the need to argue every new position he takes at face value as he clearly gets off to it.

Just point out the pattern of stupidity and laugh I say.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 05:38 PM
He started off saying that Susan Rice and HRC were the ones going to be indicted and the Russia thing was a big nothingburger. I don't see why you guys feel the need to argue every new position he takes at face value as he clearly gets off to it.

Just point out the pattern of stupidity and laugh I say.I truly don't know if he's aware just how hard he's being played.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 05:42 PM
I truly don't know if he's aware just how hard he's being played.

:lol that is your take? He is being played?

It's more like he moves from stupid position to stupid position with the full knowledge that you guys cannot help but argue each one on face value. He absolutely dictates the conversation as you are talking about him and his position. That is is mind numbingly stupid is besides the point. If anything it is bait.

You and your challenges as if you have somehow accomplished something are hilarious.

spurraider21
12-14-2017, 05:43 PM
:lol that is your take? He is being played?

It's more like he moves from stupid position to stupid position with the full knowledge that you guys cannot help but argue each one on face value. He absolutely dictates the conversation as you are talking about him and his position. That is is mind numbingly stupid is besides the point. If anything it is bait.

You and your challenges as if you have somehow accomplished something are hilarious.as hilarious as your super secret proof of koriwhat's identity

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 05:44 PM
:lol that is your take? He is being played?

It's more like he moves from stupid position to stupid position with the full knowledge that you guys cannot help but argue each one on face value. He absolutely dictates the conversation as you are talking about him and his position. That is is mind numbingly stupid is besides the point. If anything it is bait.

You and your challenges as if you have somehow accomplished something are hilarious.OK. I mean I tried to find out if he sold weed to Nazi babysitters but private investigators in California are expensive.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 05:48 PM
OK. I mean I tried to find out if he sold weed to Nazi babysitters but private investigators in California are expensive.

skinhead and try and get koriwhat to deny it.

But nice bait and switch. You know exactly what I am talking about. Really the only question I have is if it is one or two guys behind the accounts that you spend month after month going round and round with.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 05:48 PM
as hilarious as your super secret proof of koriwhat's identity

have a bone to pick, peaches? I did that for what? a few days? Chump has been doing this round and round for years with the exact same trolls.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 05:49 PM
skinhead and try and get koriwhat to deny it.Yeah, I'll get right on that.

Reck
12-14-2017, 05:59 PM
:lol Bailing out TSA with the petty in-fighting.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 06:08 PM
:lol Bailing out TSA with the petty in-fighting.

Bailing him out from what? The attention he is so clearly desperate for?

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 06:09 PM
Bailing him out from what? The attention he is so clearly desperate for?Envy isn't pretty, dude.

TSA
12-14-2017, 06:14 PM
941440768148942848

Remember WHO it is that's been investigating the DOJ/FBI since January and who is now slow rolling *some* of the evidence out in advance of his soon-to-be-released report to prepare the public for it's explosive revelations:

This isn't Judicial Watch or members of Congress doing their own investigations that uncovered the #FusionGPS/FBI/DOJ nexus of corruption.

It's this DOJ Inspector General who's been QUIETLY doing his work in the background since January while EVERYBODY focused on Mueller.

Strzok, Page, the Ohrs, Hillary's campaign funding the Trump dossier thru #FusionGPS & trying to hide it by running the $ through a law firm?

The DOJ IG is the guy who uncovered all of this.

Since nobody even knows who this guy is, allow me to introduce you to the DOJ IG: his name is Michael Horowitz.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_E…

When Horowitz announced last January he'd been tasked with investigating the DOJ/FBI for political fixing, it received so little media attention even *I* didn't hear about.

oig.justice.gov/about/meet-ig.…

Literally NOBODY at the time in the media paid any attention at all to this official announcement on January 12th, 2017.

oig.justice.gov/press/2017/201…

Here's what Horowitz and his 450 agents were specifically tasked with investigating, and what they have been pursuing QUIETLY since January:

Now, IG Horowitz and his investigators aren't LIMITED to just that; if during their investigation they discover other improper acts by FBI/DOJ officials they can investigate those improper actions as well.

Note the 1st issue Horowitz was tasked with investigating: that's Comey's decision not to press charges against Hillary Clinton & her aides *despite* the obvious fact the law was broken numerous times relating to classified information.

We now know, thanks to the IG & his special agents investigation into this, that Peter Strzok & others in the FBI *knew* Hillary & her aides, Cheryl Mills & Huma Abedin, repeatedly lied in their interviews about Hillary's illegal email server.

Clinton/Mills/Abedin insisted to the FBI agents that they never intentionally sent class. info over nonsecure lines.

Mills & Abedin compounded their lies by claiming they didn't even KNOW about this private server of Hillary's until after she left the St. Dept.

Strzok & others in the FBI at that time had emails in their possession that demonstrated Hillary/Mills/Abedin were sending emails to each other DISCUSSING the private server.

These emails were written, of course, while Hillary was still the Secretary of State.

So Strzok & other agents in the FBI were very well aware they were being lied to extensively during these interviews.

And they made a deliberate decision to let them skate.

So 1 of the VERY FIRST THINGS Horowitz established in his investigation was that proper procedures were NOT followed in this investigation of the email server.

Agents let powerful Democrats boldly lie to them and get away with it.

But, in the course of investigating why FBI agents including Strzok let Hillary & her aides boldly lie to them & then walk away without any charges, IG Horowitz uncovered SOMETHING ELSE.

Not only were FBI agents - who are supposed to be strictly politically neutral at their jobs - giving Democratic politicians & their staff preferential treatment, Horowitz discovers these same FBI agents & others at the DOJ are engaging in blatant political fixing.

In the course of looking into why FBI agents let people tell blatant lies and walk away, Horowitz discovers these same agents making use of the Trump dossier to get a FISA warrant approved for surveillance of the Trump campaign during the election.

IG Horowitz & his special agents then dig into the Trump dossier and how it was used to bolster the case to the FISA court that top Trump campaign team members needed to be investigated/surveilled as possible foreign agents.

Since by August it was know the Trump dossier was an opposition research product of #FusionGPS, it's being used by FBI agents to get a FISA warrant for surveillance of a political campaign is a huge red flag.

In fact, even earlier than this Senator Charles Grassley had become aware of information in which the FBI actually offered to pay $ to the Trump dossier's author, Christopher Steele, to continue his research into Trump. Grassley demands the FBI explain this.

So now IG Horowitz has to investigate the improper use of a political opposition research product by FBI/DOJ officials. There is no way if this dossier was accurately described as political opposition research that it should've been presented to the FISA court.

And it's while researching the Trump dossier that IG Horowitz discovers it's production was funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign. Which tried to HIDE this funding by running the $ through the law firm of Perkins Coie.

By this point, realize what Horowitz has uncovered so far:

1) FBI agents allowed Hillary & her aides to lie during interviews without ANY consequences

2) FBI agents improperly made use of political opposition research to help launch FISA surveillance of a political campaign

3) Hillary Clinton's campaign illegally tried to hide it's funding of the Trump dossier from the FEC by using a law firm.

Now here's what ELSE Horowitz discovers: FBI/DOJ officials who made use of this dossier knew it was tied to Hillary & that it was oppo research.

Through study of emails, text messages, phone calls and other records, Horowitz builds a case that demonstrates top FBI/DOJ people knew this Trump dossier was tied to the HRC campaign and the only way they could use it in FISA court was to MISREPRESENT IT to the judge.

IF Strzok & other FBI/DOJ people had ACCURATELY presented the dossier to the FISA court, it would have been inadmissible as political propaganda/oppo research.

Instead, they chose to present it as the result of INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY work.

The case Strzok & others were making to the FISA court to get that surveillance warrant was that top Trump people were likely COMPROMISED and working as AGENTS OF A FOREIGN POWER, namely Russia.

And instead of saying "And here's our proof, stuff from a dossier compiled by a former MI6 guy being paid by the HRC campaign thru #Fusion GPS!"

the FBI/DOJ decided to BOLSTER their case for the warrant by misrepresenting where this information came from.

Let me explain here it is a SERIOUS CRIME to misrepresent your evidence to the FISA court to pretend you have probable cause to believe people are acting as foreign agents & they need to be wiretapped & surveilled.

At this point, IG Horowitz and his special agent investigators had to be HORRIFIED by what they had discovered.

Now the question becomes: why were FBI/DOJ officials so DETERMINED to get this FISA surveillance of the Trump campaign?

To the point they would commit the crime of misrepresenting the origin/nature of the Russian info in the Trump dossier to the FISA court?

And the answer is: as an 'insurance policy' in case Trump won the election.

Look at all the Strzok text messages that have been released from the IG's investigation thus far.

Did he think Trump was dirty and just chock full of Russian collusion?

Yes he did.

The reason top FBI/DOJ people were determined to get the Trump campaign under FISA-approved surveillance was so they could begin collecting EVIDENCE of all the Russian/foreign collusion they just KNEW Trump & his team MUST be engaging in.

Remember: Hillary's foreign entanglements/corruption were WELL KNOWN to all the highly placed people in the Obama regime. People in the FBI/DOJ knew all about them because they'd just spent EIGHT YEARS making sure she got away with it all.

Now...how did these same people view Trump last year leading up to the election?

From their own writings, we know they believed Trump is just as corrupt as Hillary, if not MORE so.

So how hard would it be to build a case against him if they get surveillance? ��

Given that these people think Trump is even more corrupt that Hillary & must be setting up numerous pay-to-play schemes for himself leading up to the election, and certainly after WINNING it, finding evidence of Russian collusion would be CAKE.

Remember also: at the time Strzok & Ohr and all these others are engineering this FISA court surveillance, they hoped to uncover crimes they could use BEFORE the election to sink Trump's chances to win.

After Trump won the election, the FISA surveillance was SUPPOSED to now be used as an 'insurance policy' to find evidence of Trump corruption & hopefully lead to his quick impeachment.

And here's what's to funny about all of this: They got the surveillance they wanted and they found....NOTHING.

There were no pay-to-play schemes being set up, no illegal secret deals being done.

As I've been saying for going on 9 months now, if any smoking gun had been produced from any of this, it'd have leaked long ago.

Instead of finding any evidence from this FISA surveillance they can use to damage/impeach Trump, what Stzok & others ended up having to do was go after genFlynn for making perfectly legal phone calls to the Russian ambassador & manufacturing a process crime.

So here's what IG Horowitz's report is going to show: a highly partisan FBI/DOJ engaged in blatant political fixing to let Democrats skate from serious crimes while actually BREAKING THE LAW to try to nail/manufacture cases against Trump's incoming administration.

Michael E. Horowitz, remember that name.

Once Democrats & DNC Media figure out what he's done, what he's been doing and who's going to prison as a result, what they did to Ken Starr in the 1990's is going to look mild.

Ken Starr's investigation led to Bill Clinton's impeachment. Michael Horowitz's investigation will have far greater results and will actually to people going to prison for violating their offices and their oaths.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 06:18 PM
Envy isn't pretty, dude.

IF I wanted that, ll I have to do is start bringing up koriwhat's high school years and you, SR, and the troll cabal are on me like flies. I do notice how you are trying to deflect from the point I bring up.

That tells me you see it. IF you still do it that is pretty sad frankly.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 06:19 PM
REMEMBER REMEMBER THE MICHAEL E. HOROWITZ OF DECEMBER NOON BOOM DEFOO

You need to make a list of everything we were supposed to remember remember, TSA.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 06:20 PM
IF I wanted that, ll I have to do is start bringing up koriwhat's high school years and you, SR, and the troll cabal are on me like flies. I do notice how you are trying to deflect from the point I bring up.

That tells me you see it. IF you still do it that is pretty sad frankly.You don't have much of a point. It's not like you're discussing the topic or anything.

Pretty sad, frankly.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 06:23 PM
:lol that is your take? He is being played?

It's more like he moves from stupid position to stupid position with the full knowledge that you guys cannot help but argue each one on face value. He absolutely dictates the conversation as you are talking about him and his position. That is is mind numbingly stupid is besides the point. If anything it is bait.

You and your challenges as if you have somehow accomplished something are hilarious.


You don't have much of a point. It's not like you're discussing the topic or anything.

Pretty sad, frankly.

You are desperately trying to ignore this but its there just the same. You never address it directly. I await your next deflection.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 06:26 PM
Quote Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins
IF I wanted that, ll I have to do is start bringing up koriwhat's high school years and you, SR, and the troll cabal are on me like flies. I do notice how you are trying to deflect from the point I bring up.

That tells me you see it. IF you still do it that is pretty sad frankly.





do tell fuzzyfaggot... let's hear about all them years in HS i spent. i am waiting patiently. lmao! you're a fucking loser and you have nothing to say to back up any of your claims so keep on acting like you're special and not just a fucking retard like you are.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 06:33 PM
Quote Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins
IF I wanted that, ll I have to do is start bringing up koriwhat's high school years and you, SR, and the troll cabal are on me like flies. I do notice how you are trying to deflect from the point I bring up.

That tells me you see it. IF you still do it that is pretty sad frankly.





do tell fuzzyfaggot... let's hear about all them years in HS i spent. i am waiting patiently. lmao! you're a fucking loser and you have nothing to say to back up any of your claims so keep on acting like you're special and not just a fucking retard like you are.

So was Miss C your babysitter and did she date skinheads and otherwise befriend them?

Reck
12-14-2017, 06:37 PM
Bailing him out from what? The attention he is so clearly desperate for?

You're way too serious for a place where 98% of posts are basically trolling.

You get a lot of your buck from entertaining TSA. His stuff is so out in the fringes of reality that the net result of most of his predictions/comments backfire in the most epic of ways.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 06:40 PM
So was Miss C your babysitter and did she date skinheads and otherwise befriend them?

your line of questioning is fucking retarded just like you. you just keep reaching and reaching fuzzy... what exactly is your end game? trying to peg me as a white supremacist has to be the funniest thing i have ever read before.

here's a breakdown... i never hung with my bud dealer til college and even then we didn't really "hang" much at all except to pick up and smoke a bowl together. whether she went out of her way or not to befriend wannabe skins is not something i could answer because i don't know anyone of her friends except maybe 2 and they most def weren't wannabe skins.

your libretard mentality has trapped you in a box where you see everyone outside of it as an evil person when in reality you're the dipshit pos. it's true. you're a fucking loser.

now go ahead and spill the beans on all this info you got on me and all them HS yrs of mine. please, do tell. you have nothing and we all know it. there's nothing to say realistically and that's what cracks me the fuck up about you. you're a pussy homie, own it!

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 06:41 PM
You're way too serious for a place where 98% of posts are basically trolling.

You get a lot of your buck from entertaining TSA. His stuff is so out in the fringes of reality that the net result of most of his predictions/comments backfire in the most epic of ways.

If you are aware of the dynamic and still get off to it then who am I to judge?

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 06:42 PM
You are desperately trying to ignore this but its there just the same. You never address it directly. I await your next deflection.Never address discussing the topic with TSA on the discussion board?

You got me.

Congratulations.

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 06:42 PM
If you are aware of the dynamic and still get off to it then who am I to judge?Indeed.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 06:44 PM
your line of questioning is fucking retarded just like you. you just keep reaching and reaching fuzzy... what exactly is your end game? trying to peg me as a white supremacist has to be the funniest thing i have ever read before.

here's a breakdown... i never hung with my bud dealer til college and even then we didn't really "hang" much at all except to pick up and smoke a bowl together. whether she went out of her way or not to befriend wannabe skins is not something i could answer because i don't know anyone of her friends except maybe 2 and they most def weren't wannabe skins.

your libretard mentality has trapped you in a box where you see everyone outside of it as an evil person when in reality you're the dipshit pos. it's true. you're a fucking loser.

now go ahead and spill the beans on all this info you got on me and all them HS yrs of mine. please, do tell. you have nothing and we all know it. there's nothing to say realistically and that's what cracks me the fuck up about you. you're a pussy homie, own it!

How is that given you hung out with her brother the entire time? His name starts with C as well.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 06:44 PM
it's hilarious that mueller is fuzzys av because just like mueller, fuzzy has nothing and will never find anything. both are corrupt, liars, etc... two dipshits accept mueller is actually a man whether or not i like the dude.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 06:45 PM
Never address discussing the topic with TSA on the discussion board?

You got me.

Congratulations.

Feigning stupidity suits you.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 06:46 PM
How is that given you hung out with her brother the entire time? His name starts with C as well.

her brother is weird. he and her couldn't had been more different. again, spill the beans homie. i am waiting! i want to read your MOAB!

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 06:47 PM
it's hilarious that mueller is fuzzys av because just like mueller, fuzzy has nothing and will never find anything. both are corrupt, liars, etc... two dipshits accept mueller is actually a man whether or not i like the dude.

You not hang out with her brother in HS?

Mueller has 2 indictments and 2 guilty pleas in record federal investigation time, dim.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 06:48 PM
here's the real question fuzzy, what are you waiting for exactly if you have all this info on me to reveal? do it already!

i believe no one here wants this bs to keep going on and ruining thread after thread so man up or non binary up and let's hear it already.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 06:49 PM
You not hang out with her brother in HS?

Mueller has 2 indictments and 2 guilty pleas in record federal investigation time, dim.

who gives a fuck about HS to begin with puto... that's almost 20 yrs ago and i could not care less about 20 yrs ago. i hung with a ton of people over the years from every race so what's your point?

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 06:49 PM
her brother is weird. he and her couldn't had been more different. again, spill the beans homie. i am waiting! i want to read your MOAB!

Youre fucking weird. You used to dress up like Jimbo Jones all the time. I remember you hanging out with him dressed like that.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 06:51 PM
Youre fucking weird. You used to dress up like Jimbo Jones all the time. I remember you hanging out with him dressed like that.

lmao! i never dressed like jimbo jones. wish i was that cool.

spill the fucking beans or stfu already you pathetic loser. your e-cred is fading quick.

clambake
12-14-2017, 06:52 PM
lol i had to google jimbo jones

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 06:53 PM
who gives a fuck about HS to begin with puto... that's almost 20 yrs ago and i could not care less about 20 yrs ago. i hung with a ton of people over the years from every race so what's your point?

You're going with this routine? You see it now at least, Joey.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 06:53 PM
lol i had to google jimbo jones

maybe i did dress like him afterall... lol but with some pantera shirt. i can dig it!

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 06:54 PM
lmao! i never dressed like jimbo jones. wish i was that cool.

spill the fucking beans or stfu already you pathetic loser. your e-cred is fading quick.

So you didn't wear that knit cap and t-shirts? Really, Joey?

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 06:55 PM
You're going with this routine? You see it now at least, Joey.

spill the beans... you're the pussy running in circles. man up or shut up. doesn't make sense why you avoid all this "info" you got on me. just let it out already. it can't be as hard as the time you finally came out to your mother and father.

clambake
12-14-2017, 06:55 PM
lol i had to google pantera shirt.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 06:56 PM
So you didn't wear that knit cap and t-shirts? Really, Joey?

you fixate on nothing important... nothing! get to the point already pussy!

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 07:00 PM
so????

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 07:02 PM
lol Fuzzy's gone off again.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 07:02 PM
lol Fuzzy's gone off again.

he's a pussy

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 07:04 PM
you fixate on nothing important... nothing! get to the point already pussy!

I know about you Miss C, her brother, and how you dressed back then. I know you were around when she was dating skinheads and lied about being around. You didn't know I knew Chris I suppose and thought you could pass it off.

If you don't believe me at this point I don't care. I also know you are lying about having black friends.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 07:04 PM
Pav, you see how quick fuzzy is to reply but when told to just put it all out there he goes and hides? funny biz this troll game is.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 07:05 PM
lol Fuzzy's gone off again.

Oh it's okay when you go round and round with trolls but I'm the bad one? you should dump yourself, chump.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 07:06 PM
I know about you Miss C, her brother, and how you dressed back then. I know you were around when she was dating skinheads and lied about being around. You didn't know I knew Chris I suppose and thought you could pass it off.

If you don't believe me at this point I don't care. I also know you are lying about having black friends.

jesus you're a nutcase aren't you? wow! lmao black friends? i don't give a fuck who you know, who you hung out with, etc... no wonder calling her brother weird made you a bit nutty. hahaha!

just put it out there already! lets all read this funny ass bs you got.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 07:07 PM
Pav, you see how quick fuzzy is to reply but when told to just put it all out there he goes and hides? funny biz this troll game is.

You two are like peas in a pod. It's adorable.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 07:07 PM
If you don't believe me at this point I don't care.

if that's not a lie then what is? lmao

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 07:08 PM
jesus you're a nutcase aren't you? wow! lmao black friends? i don't give a fuck who you know, who you hung out with, etc... no wonder calling her brother weird made you a bit nutty. hahaha!

just put it out there already! lets all read this funny ass bs you got.

He wasn't my friend. He was your friend. That is why you kept on hanging out with him after she stopped babysitting you two. My point is that you were the awkward social outcast just like he was, Jimbo.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 07:09 PM
He wasn't my friend. He was your friend. That is why you kept on hanging out with him after she stopped babysitting you two. My point is that you were the awkward social outcast just like he was, Jimbo.

i have never been a social outcast. he might have been and might still be but not me. never. again, what's your end game with your merrygoround bs?

Pavlov
12-14-2017, 07:10 PM
Oh it's okay when you go round and round with trolls but I'm the bad one? you should dump yourself, chump.

You realize you're the troll here, right?

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 07:10 PM
i have never been a social outcast. he might have been and might still be but not me. never. again, what's your end game with your merrygoround bs?

Uh-huh. Not cool throwing your friend under the bus like that. You're the dickhead backstabbing type, eh?

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 07:11 PM
You realize you're the troll here, right?

lmao indeed he is or she or it or whatever fuzzyfag wants to be labeled.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 07:12 PM
You realize you're the troll here, right?

I did point out that if I did this that you would be all over it did I not?

TSA
12-14-2017, 07:13 PM
You too lovebirds should just IM each other and stop shitting up the thread.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 07:13 PM
Uh-huh. Not cool throwing your friend under the bus like that. You're the dickhead backstabbing type, eh?

dude this is why i had ignored you the past week. you're a fucking pussy and you can't man up to anything. run in circles, try to be cool in your own head, etc... you're a bitch and that's that.

TSA
12-14-2017, 07:14 PM
941441518669217793

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 07:14 PM
You too lovebirds should just IM each other and stop shitting up the thread.

tell it to fuzzfag. i have been waiting for his wikileaks dump of my whatever but he's too chicken shit and runs around and around. dude's a bitch straight up.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 07:15 PM
dude this is why i had ignored you the past week. you're a fucking pussy and you can't man up to anything. run in circles, try to be cool in your own head, etc... you're a bitch and that's that.

You put me on ignore the moment I pointed out I know who your babysitter was. Must've been cognitive dissonance like a bitch.

I am just stunned you would throw Chris under the bus like that. I know you weren't invited to parties just like he wasn't.

Splits
12-14-2017, 07:17 PM
Can you point me to the people talking about it in or before July 2016?

July 2016?

sure, I started a thread about it: http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=262456

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 07:17 PM
You put me on ignore the moment I pointed out I know who your babysitter was. Must've been cognitive dissonance like a bitch.

I am just stunned you would throw Chris under the bus like that. I know you weren't invited to parties just like he wasn't.

lmao you're on ignore because i don't give a fuck about you. what don't you understand? do i really want IM's from you? nah! put it all out in the open right here homie.... no need for a pussy ass IM!

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 07:19 PM
lmao you're on ignore because i don't give a fuck about you. what don't you understand? do i really want IM's from you? nah! put it all out in the open right here homie.... no need for a pussy ass IM!

So now that I am off ignore you care? How lovely!

In the meantime you weren't at the keggers we had back in HS on the weekends; your babysitter would stop by though peddling her wares. You were at home with her brother.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 07:22 PM
So now that I am off ignore you care? How lovely!

In the meantime you weren't at the keggers we had back in HS; your babysitter would stop by though peddling her wares. You were at home with her brother.

so with your logic then, you're a white supremacist?

as well, you're not off ignore. i saw a quote of yours in one of pav's replies and it dealt with my HS yrs so lets hear it already... and not your bs made up stories about hanging with her brother because i wasn't invited to some lame ass HS party.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 07:23 PM
you weren't at the keggers we had back in HS on the weekends

you must've been so cool

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 07:26 PM
so with your logic then, you're a white supremacist?

as well, you're not off ignore. i saw a quote of yours in one of pav's replies and it dealt with my HS yrs so lets hear it already... and not your bs made up stories about hanging with her brother because i wasn't invited to some lame ass HS party.

It wasn't "a" party but instead "none of them." I said she stopped by the party. She helped raise you and is admittedly a long time friend of yours.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueZ6tvqhk8U

And you would hang out with him regardless of a party or not. That is just how it was. It's not very cool throwing him under the bus now though. You're a shitty friend. I feel justified for shunning you back then moreso now.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 07:28 PM
you must've been so cool

I don't know about that but I certainly enjoyed myself. I prefer cocktails and more dignity nowadays but when youre 16 keggers are certainly entertaining.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 07:39 PM
I don't know about that but I certainly enjoyed myself. I prefer cocktails and more dignity nowadays but when youre 16 keggers are certainly entertaining.

you're a dipshit and probably were the same dipshit back in HS... fuck HS! btw, where's all this dirt you got on me? if i am asking you to reveal whatever the fuck it is you got then why aren't you doing so? pussy!

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 07:49 PM
you're a dipshit and probably were the same dipshit back in HS... fuck HS! btw, where's all this dirt you got on me? if i am asking you to reveal whatever the fuck it is you got then why aren't you doing so? pussy!

Well I went off to college and have not seen you since. I enjoyed HS. Sorry that you did not. It makes sense you didn't considering how you will throw your friends under the bus for spurstalk cred though. That was just sad, Joey.

And who said anything about dirt? I am just saying that you were not liberal back in the day and have always been right wing. That is what started this whole conversation, dim. Remember now?

boutons_deux
12-14-2017, 07:50 PM
Stone’s Supposed Assange Intermediary Pleads 5th Before House Intel Interview

Satirist and radio host Randy Credico was released from an interview with the House Intelligence Committee after his lawyer told the committee he planned on pleading the Fifth Amendment,

“Since your client will be pleading the 5th Amendment, the Committee does not require his presence for the scheduled interview,”

Roger Stone claimed (http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/house-intel-stone-credico) that Credico had been his intermediary with Assange. Stone emphasized (https://www.facebook.com/rogerstone/posts/10155756631713617) that Credico hadn’t transferred anything secret or privileged to him.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/randy-credico-released-house-intelligence-interview?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20tpm-news%20%28TPMNews%29

DarrinS
12-14-2017, 07:52 PM
This retarded shit again? Can’t you faggots just PM each other.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 07:56 PM
Well I went off to college and have not seen you since. I enjoyed HS. Sorry that you did not. It makes sense you didn't considering how you will throw your friends under the bus for spurstalk cred though. That was just sad, Joey.

And who said anything about dirt? I am just saying that you were not liberal back in the day and have always been right wing. That is what started this whole conversation, dim. Remember now?

actually i did go to college and did get a degree... in nothing really, but i got a degree just to do it. so tell me more about how you know me. i'm still waiting puto!

as for political party in HS, wtf are you going on about? people can't even vote til they are 18 yrs old. almost as laughable as the whole "school council" bs. politics weren't even a part of my daily thinking when i was a teen. but you hung out with my babysitter at parties and you claim she dated skins so that must make you far right? hmmm, it all makes sense now. project, project, and project some more.

so boohoo i threw a friend under the bus, right? nah... he was socially inept, never wanted to get out of mommys house, made excuses not to hang when invited because he is a video game nerd and i am not but his nerd friends who played those mmorpgs were more important to him and so be it. time passes us all by and i don't have the time to give a fuck about what he's up to.

what else big shot?

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 07:58 PM
This retarded shit again? Can’t you faggots just PM each other.

no. i have him on ignore and just happened to see him quoted in pav's reply. it is what it is. i might be a fool but fuzzy is def a bitch.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 08:01 PM
so if i got this right fuzzyfag, your whole point was to get me to admit that i align with conservatism and am a republican? that's it? what party do you subscribe to again? whatever it is, peg me as the opposite because i'd hate to be in a party of dipshits like yourself.

DarrinS
12-14-2017, 08:03 PM
no. i have him on ignore and just happened to see him quoted in pav's reply. it is what it is. i might be a fool but fuzzy is def a bitch.

If you have him on ignore, you’re doing it wrong. No one cares what that assclown knows or doesn’t know about you. He craves attention and you’re giving ii to him.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 08:04 PM
If you have him on ignore, you’re doing it wrong. No one cares what that assclown knows or doesn’t know about you. He craves attention and you’re giving ii to him.

indeed he does... attention whore is nicely describing fuzzyfags ways.

now that i know exactly what his end game was, i guess i can go back to ignoring his bs. dude is a nutcase.

dabom
12-14-2017, 08:08 PM
Agree to drop this shtick. For both sides.

dabom
12-14-2017, 08:10 PM
I agree with my dude Darrin.

Chris
12-14-2017, 08:11 PM
All TMZ up in here without TSA/DarrinS/Chris to class up the thread :lol I'll be dropping some fact bombs in a little bit to get it (the thread) back on track.

koriwhat
12-14-2017, 08:12 PM
All TMZ up in here without TSA/DarrinS/Chris to class up the thread :lol I'll be dropping some fact bombs in a little bit to get it (the thread) back on track.

:tu

dabom
12-14-2017, 08:12 PM
All TMZ up in here without TSA/DarrinS/Chris to class up the thread :lol I'll be dropping some fact bombs in a little bit to get it (the thread) back on track.

Pics don't count as classing up the thread. And they don't explain anything. It's like spam.

dabom
12-14-2017, 08:18 PM
We can make fun of repugs without the extra stuff. It's more fun anyways. :lol

spurraider21
12-14-2017, 08:26 PM
We can make fun of repugs without the extra stuff. It's more fun anyways. :lol
you voted that it was super important

dabom
12-14-2017, 08:28 PM
you voted that it was super important

And it was funny in that thread. :lol

Reck
12-14-2017, 08:33 PM
941441518669217793

Running out of new material, TSA?

This is like 3 month old news.

Chris
12-14-2017, 08:41 PM
Judicial Watch: Hillary and Huma Hid Call Logs and Record of Gifts When Leaving Obama State Dept

https://cdn1.ijr.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/hillary_email-e1513274277395-676x330.jpg


Hillary Clinton and her aide and confidante Huma Abedin were allowed to take many of their U.S. Department of State records to keep them secret when they left office, according to Judicial Watch.

Judicial Watch has just released documents showing that taking those records is "contrary to FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] and other laws.”


Screenshot/Judicial Watch
The conservative public interest group said that the two were allowed to carry out multiple boxes of records as they walked out the door of the Obama State Department. They were given a specific notation that they may not be released to the general public under FOIA:

NOTE: The Secretary’s call log, grid and schedules are not classified, however, they would not be released to the general public under FOIA. They are being released to the Secretary with this understanding. [Emphasis in original]

Judicial Watch was given a breakdown of some of the items removed:

Electronic copy of “daily files” — which are word versions of public documents and non-records: speeches/press statements/photos from the website, a non-record copy of the schedule, a non record copy of the call log, press clips, and agenda of daily activities.

[...]

The new records also show that Huma Abedin was allowed to take five boxes of “physical files” out of the State Department that include records described as “Muslim Engagement Documents.”


Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images
The group reported that the originals of some documents were allowed to be taken, with “no indication that a copy was made”:

The most significant of these are her personal correspondence and gift binders, which could reflect Clinton Foundation and Clinton Global Initiative ties.

[...]

The documents indicate that Clinton removed a physical file of “the log of the Secretary’s gifts with pictures of gifts.”

Gifts are regulated by federal law to avoid a conflict of interest, according to Judicial Watch.

In a press release, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said the people have a right to review these documents:

We already know the Obama State Department let Hillary Clinton steal and then delete her government emails, which included classified information. But these new records show that was only part of the scandal. These new documents show the Obama State Department had a deal with Hillary Clinton to hide her calls logs and schedules, which would be contrary to FOIA and other laws.

Chris
12-14-2017, 08:42 PM
https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t31.0-8/25358358_10155548776466943_5339880170900048720_o.j pg?oh=ac91dbf8e3486e40fafa9e1cbb1cb5b9&oe=5ACE7251

Chris
12-14-2017, 08:43 PM
Gowdy mode :tu

https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/25299071_10155090650636770_5781470287877374470_n.j pg?oh=652d792ec8c0257b7c21e05ec14f9bef&oe=5AC4EB2C

Chris
12-14-2017, 08:48 PM
Democrats Mobilize Against Rod Rosenstein As Inspector General Investigation Zeroes In On FBI


Democrats are attacking Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s credibility after the Department of Justice released text messages showing a top FBI agent on both the Clinton email investigation and the Russia probe rooting for Clinton while he was investigating her and discussing an unknown “insurance policy” against Trump in case he won the election.

The pro-Clinton, anti-Trump messages were, ironically, discovered as part of an investigation into the DOJ and FBI launched by the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General (IG) in response to Democratic politicians demanding a probe into possible anti-Clinton bias at the FBI.

Democratic politicians and left-wing media have attacked Rosenstein’s credibility in response, claiming he should have blocked the messages’ release. (RELATED: ‘We Can’t Take That Risk’ — FBI Officials Discussed ‘Insurance Policy’ Against Trump Presidency)

Democratic Maryland Rep. Jamie Raskin, one of 58 House Democrats to vote in favor impeaching Trump, attacked Rosenstein and the Department of Justice on the House floor on Thursday.

Raskin claimed the release of the text messages show “that there are people in the Department of Justice who apparently are cooperating with this effort to undermine the integrity and the strength of this special counsel investigation.”

The DOJ, Raskin argued, should have withheld the damning messages, which were exchanged on taxpayer-funded cell phones.

Raskin said “the key thing to understand is that all of those text messages are totally irrelevant” and claimed they were nothing more than political opinions.

Democratic California Sen. Dianne Feinstein told Mother Jones on Wednesday that the messages “are being used for propaganda purposes.” She added: “I think there’s an ongoing effort to malign both Bob Mueller and the work that that Special Counsel Office is doing. They are grabbing at every single thing to try to demean him.”

The text messages go well beyond simple political opinions and are part of a larger pattern of bias on Mueller’s team. (RELATED: Top Senate Republican Wants DOJ To Twist Screws On Probe Into FBI Deputy Director McCabe)

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley noted that some of the texts “appear to go beyond merely expressing a private political opinion, and appear to cross the line into taking some official action to create an ‘insurance policy’ against a Trump presidency.”

Benjamin Wittes, a staunch ally of former FBI director James Comey, claimed in a blog post that the text messages’ publication were part of “a partisan circus.”

Wittes is a close friend of Comey and has been one of his strongest public defenders since he was fired as FBI director. In May, Wittes relayed that Comey had “concerns” about Rosenstein as assistant attorney general. Now, as an internal DOJ investigation sheds light on a troubled FBI under Comey, Wittes is ramping up the attacks on Rosenstein.

“Rosenstein here has, at a minimum, contributed to that circus—at the expense of his own employees. In throwing a career FBI agent and career FBI lawyer to the wolves by authorizing the release to the public of their private text messages—without any finding that they had done anything wrong—he once again sent a message to his workforce that he is not the sort of man with whom you want to share your foxhole,” Wittes wrote on his LawFare blog.

He added a warning: “The DOJ and FBI workforces will not forget that. Nor should they.” (RELATED: Schumer: Intelligence Community May ‘Get Back At’ Trump For Tweet [VIDEO])

Journalists circulated Wittes’ criticism of Rosenstein on social media and left-wing pundits echoed his points.

“These were government documents – texts on government devices. So the formal privacy claim is limited,” Talking Points Memo publisher Josh Marshall conceded, before arguing: “But let’s be honest. It’s still a massive breach of privacy. Political and personal chit chat and sounding off between two lovers?”

That the DOJ released some of the Strzok texts, Marshall argued, showed that Rosentstein had become “bent and deformed.”

Marshall didn’t note that the DOJ released just a small fraction of the Strzok-Page messages and redacted personal details in the messages it did release.

Former FBI Assistant Director Chris Swecker, who has praised Special Counsel Robert Mueller and his handling of the Russia investigation, said last week that the Strzok scandal reflects “disarray” at the FBI “that is left over from the Comey era.”

In his testimony on Wednesday, Rosenstein said the DOJ “consulted with the inspector general to determine that he had no objection to releasing the material” before doing so. “If he had, we would not have released it,” Rosenstein said.

A report on the IG’s findings is expected sometime in the spring.

Democrats had previously praised both Rosenstein and the IG probe.

“I think Rosenstein is 100 percent honorable, and I think Mueller is a 100 percent professional,” Democratic Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse told Politico in June. “And you know, Mueller has to report to somebody. I’d rather have it be Rosenstein than anybody else I can think of in the department, particularly with [Attorney General Jeff] Sessions recused.”

Democrats were similarly more receptive to the IG’s probe when they suspected anti-Clinton bias at the FBI.

“In our committee one of the things that we say is that we have integrity, and of all the organizations that we have, the FBI is the one that we must have trusted,” Democratic Maryland Rep. Elijah Cummings told reporters in January following news of the IG probe.

“And I think this investigation by the IG, I don’t know what it will reveal, but you know I think we need to go through that process, because if we’re not careful we will reach a crisis of legitimacy with regard to the very fabric of our country and the fabric–when I say the fabric, I’m talking about organizations like the CIA, FBI and others.”

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 10:42 PM
actually i did go to college and did get a degree... in nothing really, but i got a degree just to do it. so tell me more about how you know me. i'm still waiting puto!

as for political party in HS, wtf are you going on about? people can't even vote til they are 18 yrs old. almost as laughable as the whole "school council" bs. politics weren't even a part of my daily thinking when i was a teen. but you hung out with my babysitter at parties and you claim she dated skins so that must make you far right? hmmm, it all makes sense now. project, project, and project some more.

so boohoo i threw a friend under the bus, right? nah... he was socially inept, never wanted to get out of mommys house, made excuses not to hang when invited because he is a video game nerd and i am not but his nerd friends who played those mmorpgs were more important to him and so be it. time passes us all by and i don't have the time to give a fuck about what he's up to.

what else big shot?

You went to community college and got a associates in graphic design. Not quite the same thing.

And you continue to throw him under the bus. What a dickhead. Like I said I am glad to never have been your friend.

TSA
12-14-2017, 10:54 PM
This is worse than the GiG/Norcal510 feud.

Fuck off already.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 11:18 PM
:cry Fuzzy is interrupting my circle jerk with Chump /stampfoot :cry

TSA
12-14-2017, 11:27 PM
:rollin “on ignore”

FuzzyLumpkins
12-14-2017, 11:48 PM
:rollin “on ignore”

We've been over this before, dim. I'm not Chump and Reck. I don't want to do the round and round with you. That does not mean I will never look at your posts. HAve fun spamming your 4chan/breitbart conspiratard takes.

DarrinS
12-15-2017, 12:19 AM
Sad to see a classic thread hijacked by some high school bs.

djohn2oo8
12-15-2017, 12:43 AM
941462671941079041

boutons_deux
12-15-2017, 01:04 AM
Mueller Sought Emails of Trump Campaign Data Firm

Special counsel asked Cambridge Analytica to hand over employees’ emails, in sign of investigators’ interest in campaign data operation

https://www.wsj.com/articles/mueller-sought-emails-of-trump-campaign-data-firm-1513296899

Kushner gave his demographic data to CA, which combined it with CA's data, and CA gave it all to Pootin's cyber/hacker army.

CA is owned by extreme right wing billionaire Robert Mercer who finances Breitbart, Bannon, and donated to Trash's campaign

Cambridge Analytica, the shady data firm that might be a key Trump-Russia link, explained
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/16/15657512/cambridge-analytica-trump-kushner-flynn-russia

Chris
12-15-2017, 01:54 AM
Shady data firm :wow were they the ones responsible for the Russian troll farms and Pokémons?

FuzzyLumpkins
12-15-2017, 02:54 AM
Sad to see a classic thread hijacked by some high school bs.

It's no worse than your incessant mindless deflections,dissembling, and blanket dismissals nor TSA's idiotic conspiratard spam with Chump round and rounds nor chris and spurt's meme stream.

Pavlov
12-15-2017, 04:16 AM
It's no worse than your incessant mindless deflections,dissembling, and blanket dismissals nor TSA's idiotic conspiratard spam with Chump round and rounds nor chris and spurt's meme stream.I'd say it is much worse because your particular jihad has nothing to do with politics.

This is not the high school grudge forum.

djohn2oo8
12-15-2017, 08:39 AM
941303029436993536

boutons_deux
12-15-2017, 10:18 AM
Rachel Maddow Wants To Know Why We Always Learn About Trump-Putin Meetings From Russian News

"Why does this keep happening?

Why do we consistently have to get news about the behavior and the meetings and the conversations of the American president

from the Russian government?"

http://www.politicususa.com/2017/12/14/rachel-maddow-learn-trump-putin-meetings-russian-news.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29

FuzzyLumpkins
12-15-2017, 10:45 AM
I'd say it is much worse because your particular jihad has nothing to do with politics.

This is not the high school grudge forum.

Of course you wouldn't but as I pointed out last time we had this conversation, your way helped drive off a whole slew of unique, longtime accounts a few years ago. I even posted the thread where they asked you to cool your shit a short time before they left here. I will let that speak on its own.

If you stop posting I don't think people will give a shit.

Pavlov
12-15-2017, 11:00 AM
Of course you wouldn't but as I pointed out last time we had this conversation, your way helped drive off a whole slew of unique, longtime accounts a few years ago. I even posted the thread where they asked you to cool your shit a short time before they left here. I will let that speak on its own.

If you stop posting I don't think people will give a shit.If you stop posting people will celebrate.

monosylab1k
12-15-2017, 11:06 AM
you know I make valid points.

https://media.giphy.com/media/I4Jmrcjnr8Zfq/200w.gif

FuzzyLumpkins
12-15-2017, 12:41 PM
If you stop posting people will celebrate.

Sure. You, TSA, chucho, Chris, Spurt, Terrence, DMC.

Great company you keep.

In the meantime your presence and routine drives people away.

spurraider21
12-15-2017, 12:45 PM
I’d be for it tbh

FuzzyLumpkins
12-15-2017, 12:47 PM
I’d be for it tbh

and my point remains the same. youre like chump lite.

Pavlov
12-15-2017, 12:55 PM
Of course you wouldn't but as I pointed out last time we had this conversation, your way helped drive off a whole slew of unique, longtime accounts a few years ago. I even posted the thread where they asked you to cool your shit a short time before they left here. I will let that speak on its own.That happened because a couple of posters thought they had discovered my identity and kept posting about it over and over and over.

Now you think you have discovered some other poster's identity and keep posting about it over and over and over.

lol

FuzzyLumpkins
12-15-2017, 01:02 PM
That happened because a couple of posters thought they had discovered my identity and kept posting about it over and over and over.

Now you think you have discovered some other poster's identity and keep posting about it over and over and over.

lol

You are leaving out the part where you responded to each and every smilie filled idiocy they posted for over a year. It was hour after hour, day after day. That is what drove people off cause they could not get away from a page full of posts of your idiocy.

I troll Joey for a day or two in one thread to get him going and the leave it alone. It is not remotely the same thing. And of course you serve to perpetuate and worsen the situation as you are doing here.

And I know who Joey is it should be quite obvious from this most recent conversation. He doesn't argue that his babysitter was not a skinhead. He was never a liberal. He doesn't have black friends.

Pavlov
12-15-2017, 01:14 PM
You are leaving out the part where you responded to each and every smilie filled idiocy they posted for over a year. It was hour after hour, day after day. That is what drove people off cause they could not get away from a page full of posts of your idiocy.I told them they were wrong and they should stop. Turns out i was right.


I troll Joey for a day or two in one thread to get him going and the leave it alone. It is not remotely the same thing. And of course you serve to perpetuate and worsen the situation as you are doing here.It's exactly the same thing.


And I know who Joey is it should be quite obvious from this most recent conversation. He doesn't argue that his babysitter was not a skinhead. He was never a liberal. He doesn't have black friends.Nobody cares. Why do you care so much?

FuzzyLumpkins
12-15-2017, 01:22 PM
I told them they were wrong and they should stop. Turns out i was right.

It's exactly the same thing.

Nobody cares. Why do you care so much?

Of course you would go with the braindead moral equivalency. And being right is your excuse for taking a gigantic shit on the forum? Nice.

Speak for yourself. Plenty of people were incredulous about his claims of once being liberal and now being independent.

Anywho this is boring and I am moving on.

Pavlov
12-15-2017, 01:32 PM
Of course you would go with the braindead moral equivalency. And being right is your excuse for taking a gigantic shit on the forum? Nice.You're trying to do the exact same thing. :lol


Speak for yourself. Plenty of people were incredulous about his claims of once being liberal and now being independent.No one cares about what you are talking about. No one.


Anywho this is boring and I am moving on.If only trying to brag about something no one cares about bored you as much.

djohn2oo8
12-15-2017, 03:32 PM
941738142670913536
TSA getting skullfucked again

djohn2oo8
12-15-2017, 03:36 PM
941766078618898432

Reck
12-15-2017, 03:37 PM
941738142670913536
TSA getting skullfucked again

In before TSA claims Schiffs was the one responsible for the leaks....to Fox News. :lol

Reck
12-15-2017, 03:39 PM
Fox News first reported on the messages on Dec. 6, claiming that more than 10,000 texts between the two officials had been found and were being reviewed. The article raised questions about possible anti-Trump bias in the special counsel investigation over messages that criticized Trump.

Pavlov (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=7343) get in here and laugh at TSA (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=7640) backfire.

Spurtacular
12-15-2017, 04:09 PM
941462671941079041

And their lawyers undoubtedly told Mueller to GFH; he can subpoena under a narrow scope if necessary.

Spurtacular
12-15-2017, 04:12 PM
Pavlov (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=7343) get in here and laugh at TSA (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=7640) backfire.

Tranny thinks mindless cackling is a rebuttal. Don't want to strain that tranny brain. :lol

Spurtacular
12-15-2017, 04:20 PM
Sure. You, TSA, chucho, Chris, Spurt, Terrence, DMC.

Great company you keep.

In the meantime your presence and routine drives people away.

Tbf, I likely would only realize you're gone 'til weeks later.

boutons_deux
12-15-2017, 04:21 PM
corrupt, compromised, racist Sessions leaked the FBI txts, to undercut and push the shutdown of Mueller

koriwhat
12-15-2017, 04:29 PM
You went to community college and got a associates in graphic design. Not quite the same thing.

And you continue to throw him under the bus. What a dickhead. Like I said I am glad to never have been your friend.

dude, i don't know what bs you're on but you're worse than a crazy ex girlfriend. wtf? and btw, i didn't get an associates in graphic design mr. knowitall. lmao! one bs lie after another with you. go jack off and leave me alone already you fucking loser.


This is worse than the GiG/Norcal510 feud.

Fuck off already.

for real! wtf is up with that queer fuzzy?

koriwhat
12-15-2017, 04:39 PM
I troll Joey for a day or two in one thread to get him going and the leave it alone...And I know who Joey is it should be quite obvious from this most recent conversation. He doesn't argue that his babysitter was not a skinhead. He was never a liberal. He doesn't have black friends.

i have no "black" friends and my old babysitter was a skinhead latina. lmao! shit is just lol rofl levels. btw fuzzy, you're looking more and more like a bitch with every post.


Plenty of people were incredulous about his claims of once being liberal and now being independent.

i'm not even independent! i am nothing and so are you. as for politics, i sit on no side. ripped my shitty voter registration card up today that came in the mail as well. again, tell me how much of a conservative i am. it cracks me up to see you lose your shit because i won't pick a side in your clown show. you fucking clown!

boutons_deux
12-15-2017, 04:44 PM
Trump made at least 7 false claims about Russia in 90 seconds

"They've found tremendous things on the other side..."



Let’s put it this way — there is absolutely no collusion. That has been proven.


No, it hasn’t. What we do have proof of is that the Trump campaign wanted to collude (https://thinkprogress.org/donald-trump-jr-releases-emails-showing-trump-campaign-knowingly-colluded-with-russia-b21a822c864c/) with Russia, and that Russian agents helped Trump by leaking hacked emails meant to make Democrats look bad (https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/g/page/politics/the-intelligence-community-report-on-russian-activities-in-the-2016-election/2153/). There is no proof, however, that collusion didn’t occur.

When you look at the committees, whether it’s the Senate or the House, everybody — my worst enemies, they walk out, they say, ‘there is no collusion but we’ll continue to look.’


This is not the conclusion of “everybody” on the committees. Multiple members of the committees say there has been evidence of collusion (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/schiff-defends-committee-examining-russia-trump-connections-n735391), if not yet definitive proof (http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/12/14/ron-wyden-reaction-russia-probe-mueller-latest-tsr.cnn).

They’re spending millions and millions of dollars. There is absolutely no collusion. I didn’t make a phone call to Russia, I have nothing to do with Russia.

This is also false. Trump has gotten caught making contradictory statements about his relationship with Vladimir Putin (https://thinkprogress.org/trump-putin-extra-22babc3a8e19/), and his sons have bragged publicly about the Trump Organization’s business relationships with Russians (https://thinkprogress.org/eric-trump-reportedly-bragged-about-russian-funding-streams-e6f3e525f10e/).

Everybody knows it. That was a Democrat hoax, it was an excuse for losing the election, and it should have never been this way where they’ve spent all these millions of dollars.



The FBI investigation into the Trump campaign’s Russia contacts actually began before in July 2016 (https://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/fbi-trump-russia-probe-timeline-236258), months before Clinton’s loss.

So now even the Democrats admit, there’s no collusion, there is no collusion, that’s it, and we gotta get back to running the country.


Again, the claim that any Democrat has “admitted” there’s no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia is false (http://www.newsweek.com/trump-russia-collusion-impeachment-waters-669866).


What we have found, and what they have found, after looking at this, really, scam, is they found tremendous — whatever you want to call it, you’re going to have to make up your own determination — but they’ve found tremendous things on the other side.



Trump is likely referring to the Uranium One “scandal” which has revealed no evidence of wrongdoing by Clinton (https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/).

When you look at the Hillary Clinton investigation, it’s — you know, I’ve been saying it for a long time — that was a rigged system folks, that was a rigged system. When you look at what they did with respect to the Hillary Clinton investigation, it was rigged and there has never been anything like it in this country that we’ve ever found before.



Just days before the election, then-FBI Director James Comey went out of his way to publicize that investigators were taking a fresh look at evidence (https://thinkprogress.org/the-fbi-directors-letter-about-the-clinton-emails-says-a-lot-less-than-the-media-wants-you-to-aa61e81e5a97/) pertaining to the Clinton emails investigation — a controversial move that some pollsters believe cost her the presidency (https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-comey-letter-probably-cost-clinton-the-election/).

Trump and his backers haven’t been able to provide a coherent explanation (https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/938955004232204289) for why the FBI would have done that if bureau brass was in fact trying to take Trump down.

It’s very, very sad — very, very sad.

This is accurate.

https://thinkprogress.org/trump-makes-at-least-7-false-claims-in-one-90-second-statement-about-russia-9091a6fb4ef6/