Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[TSA]

Depends on what the meaning of ok is. Is it legal? I wouldn't know, honestly. Filing knowingly false reports is probably illegal, but giving mistaken tips to police is probably not. Political campaigns complaining about stuff they think is or should be illegal, for better and for worse, is a common political tactic. Throwing shit against the wall without regard to its truth or falsity is more or less Republican SOP, as characterized the by serial Benghazi probes. It's certainly unethical and not ok in that sense, but at this point it appears to be customary for both sides to try to trigger official investigations of the other side, "to damage them" in the eyes of voters.

You cheer it on when your side does it, and cry when it happens to yours.

Do you condone the Clinton campaign creating false stories and feeding them to the FBI to trigger FBI investigations into her opponent Trump in order to damage his presidential campaign and later damage his presidency?

[ChumpDumper]

It's OK, TSA -- you still got Hilary dead to rights on eating Silsby babies in uranium-lined pizzeria child sex dungeons.

Tick-tock!

[Winehole23]

Do you condone the Clinton campaign creating false stories and feeding them to the FBI to trigger FBI investigations into her opponent Trump in order to damage his presidential campaign and later damage his presidency?I'm not convinced that's what happened, Pizzagate guy, maybe you're just gullible.

[TSA]

I'm not convinced that's what happened, Pizzagate guy, maybe you're just gullible.

You're not convinced the Clinton campaign fed the FBI the Alfa Bank hoax and the Steele dossier? Maybe you're just retarded.

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/JeffMordock/status/1531683472670064642
:rollin

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/JeffMordock/status/1531683472670064642
:rollin
whats the rest of the quote in the next tweet, TSA?

:lmao

[Winehole23]

You're not convinced the Clinton campaign fed the FBI the Alfa Bank hoax and the Steele dossier? Maybe you're just retarded.whatever, pizzagate dude

Durham's fishing expedition didn't deliver the goods, it's hilarious you're tripling down and declaring total vindication.

[Ef-man]

You're not convinced the Clinton campaign fed the FBI the Alfa Bank hoax and the Steele dossier? Maybe you're just retarded.

You should have stayed in Korea, without internet, busy working, 24/7, recovering from your back surgery, tbh. :lol

[Winehole23]

Final arguments: Friday

Yesterday: Memorial Day holiday

This morning: not guilty verdict


Sounds like Durham indicted, but failed to convict, a ham sandwich.

[TSA]

whatever, pizzagate dude

Durham's fishing expedition didn't deliver the goods, it's hilarious you're tripling down and declaring total vindication.

He exposed the Clinton campaigns entire scheme of using campaign operatives and opposition researchers to feed false stories to the FBI and exploit them into investigating a political rival. This is all now in the public record. His final report will be even more damning.

[Winehole23]

:lmao

[ElNono]

Well, then... never more appropriate than here it seems...

https://i.imgflip.com/1nhqil.jpg?a459384

[ElNono]

Here comes the point where the discussion shifts into the moral plane because the legal plane is sound...

[Reck]

TSA coming out of retirement to argue a losing point. Lmao

Take your L.

[ElNono]

https://twitter.com/JeffMordock/status/1531683472670064642
:rollin

Literally next tweet:

1531683655843827715

:rollin

[Winehole23]

Durham using a weak case against Sussmann to establish a political narrative in the public record rhymes with the Trumpista grievance against Mueller, the main difference being that Mueller brought seven criminal cases and won them. It's not about principles or the law, Trumpistas are snowflakes and sore losers. They can dish it out, but fall to crying immediately when the roles are reversed.

[Winehole23]

lol Republican snipe hunts

[Spurs Homer]

lolololololololololol

the guys that always cry “witch hunt”


CRYING over durhams actual witch hunt

the fbi, clintons, intel, etc


NONE OF THEM

are trembling when any trump PLANT investigates them because THEY HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE- NEVER DID- NEVER WILL

TRUMP WAS IN BED WITH RUSSIA

and is a fucking traitor and any witch hunt of the “investigate the investigators”
is no different than

OJ SEARCHING FOR THE KILLERS!


Called this from day-1

sorry comrade TSA


bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

[RandomGuy]

He exposed the Clinton campaigns entire scheme of using campaign operatives and opposition researchers to feed false stories to the FBI and exploit them into investigating a political rival. This is all now in the public record. His final report will be even more damning.

All of that is far less important than Trumps multiple actions that easily constitute obstruction of justice, tbh. One is shady, the other is deliberately criminal that actively undermines the rule of law.

[RandomGuy]

Durham using a weak case against Sussmann to establish a political narrative in the public record rhymes with the Trumpista grievance against Mueller, the main difference being that Mueller brought seven criminal cases and won them. It's not about principles or the law, Trumpistas are snowflakes and sore losers. They can dish it out, but fall to crying immediately when the roles are reversed.

Pretty much. This is the OIG investigation report redux.

[RandomGuy]

Flynn, you know the dude from the OP, has gone full on tin foil hat.

Mysterious elites may be plotting to release a new virus because "their little plan with COVID didn't work," the former national security adviser said.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/michael-flynn-covid-conspiracy-theory_n_619ef84ee4b0451e5503785e

Trump's former national security adviser, a QAnon believer, seemed to suggest vaccines might be imposed on people via salad.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/michael-flynn-vaccines-salad-dressing_n_614bbe21e4b03d83baceb1fa

etc.

Dude caters to that crowd to make money. Totally skeezy.

[boutons_deux]

Flynn, you know the dude from the OP, has gone full on tin foil hat.

Mysterious elites may be plotting to release a new virus because "their little plan with COVID didn't work," the former national security adviser said.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/michael-flynn-covid-conspiracy-theory_n_619ef84ee4b0451e5503785e

Trump's former national security adviser, a QAnon believer, seemed to suggest vaccines might be imposed on people via salad.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/michael-flynn-vaccines-salad-dressing_n_614bbe21e4b03d83baceb1fa

etc.

Dude caters to that crowd to make money. Totally skeezy.

Flynn was already a flake, is why Obama fired him. Lt General? WTF? how does a shitbag rise so high in the military? climbing by seniority only?

[Brazil]

He exposed the Clinton campaigns entire scheme of using campaign operatives and opposition researchers to feed false stories to the FBI and exploit them into investigating a political rival. This is all now in the public record. His final report will be even more damning.

Tick tock ?

:lmao

buffoon

[Ef-man]

Chuncko and hater avoiding this thread like the plague. :lol

[Ef-man]

But in his defense, hater would only end up giving the plague to his family if he commented, so there is that. :lol

[ElNono]

Durham using a weak case against Sussmann to establish a political narrative in the public record rhymes with the Trumpista grievance against Mueller, the main difference being that Mueller brought seven criminal cases and won them. It's not about principles or the law, Trumpistas are snowflakes and sore losers. They can dish it out, but fall to crying immediately when the roles are reversed.

He got cucked pre-trial by the judge on trying to advance that narrative. He still pushed on, and got served the turd sandwich. C'est la vie.

If he can prove that connection, he should sue the Clinton campaign, Shillary, etc... we'll see what he does next.

[ElNono]

Good thing Sussman didn't admit to lying to the Feds in court, not once, but twice... or he'll likely be looking for a pardon right now...

[DMC]

I'm not convinced that's what happened, Pizzagate guy, maybe you're just gullible.

Translation "I can post mountains of unsubstantiated tweets about the right but need proof before I'll make a comment about the left"

[daboom1]

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1529958022822432773?t

Judge and Jury were totally legit :tu

[ChumpDumper]

:lol Trumptard tears

[Winehole23]

Translation "I can post mountains of unsubstantiated tweets about the right but need proof before I'll make a comment about the left"I'll repeat my take since you seem to have missed it. Sharing oppo research with reporters is no big deal. Bullshit tipoffs to LE are unethical, but intentional deception can be hard to prove, Durham sure failed to in this case.

Keep nursing det grudge, tho.

:lol

[DMC]

I'll repeat my take since you seem to have missed it. Sharing oppo research with reporters is no big deal. Bullshit tipoffs to LE are unethical, but intentional deception can be hard to prove, Durham sure failed to in this case.

Keep nursing det grudge, tho.

:lol
You're a turd on the sidewalk, commenting about you isn't nursing a grudge, it's pointing out the shit on the sidewalk.

[Winehole23]

You're a turd on the sidewalk.nope, no grudge there, just neutral description

[Ef-man]

And Chuncko continues with the personal attacks.

Let me try: Type-2 diabetes is a hell of an illness, amirite Chuncko! :lol

[DMC]

nope, no grudge there, just neutral description

A turd by any other name..

[Winehole23]

https://c.tenor.com/eEAqXEtMAuIAAAAd/caddyshack-pool-cleaning.gif

[FuzzyLumpkins]

You're a turd on the sidewalk, commenting about you isn't nursing a grudge, it's pointing out the shit on the sidewalk.

weird gaslighting, dude.

[Winehole23]

Bash report FOIA'd

Leaks to media, yes, but no improper unmasking requests by senior Obama officials.


“My review has uncovered no evidence that senior Executive Branch officials sought the disclosure of” the identities of US individuals “in disseminated intelligence reports for political purposes or other inappropriate reasons during the 2016 presidential-election period or the ensuing presidential-transition period,” Bash’s report said.

A central focus of the probe was the leak showing that Flynn had been in communication with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak prior to Trump’s inauguration, and whether Flynn’s involvement was revealed through an unmasking request from a government official.

But Bash’s review of unmasked intelligence reports about the calls found that the FBI did not in fact disseminate any that contained Flynn’s information, and that a single unmasked report that did contain Flynn’s information did not describe the calls between him and Kislyak. “For that reason, the public disclosure of the communications could not have resulted from an unmasking request,” Bash’s report concludes.

Intriguingly, the prosecutor did find that “the FBI shared transcripts of the relevant communications outside the Bureau without masking General Flynn’s name,” but notes that he did not investigate those incidents any further because “evaluating that dissemination, and determining how the information was provided to the media, is beyond the scope of this review.” No information about who shared those transcripts and who received them is contained in Bash’s report.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/jasonleopold/heres-the-doj-report-finding-that-obama-officials-didnt

[Winehole23]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FUIfB7eUAAEsNpp?format=jpg&name=medium

[daboom1]

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1529958022822432773?t

Judge and Jury were totally legit :tu

[spurraider21]

:cry

[DMC]

weird gaslighting, dude.

Not as weird as you needing to be on my nuts.

[Winehole23]

(DMC trolls freely in an open forum, as is proper, but whines and falls to name calling when he's the target. So tuff!)

[Winehole23]

Key findings of the bipartisan committee are front-loaded, hardly seems the nothingburger Trumpistas keep harping on.

https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/senate-intelligence-committee-russian-interference/8cf58e574d235164/full.pdf

[Winehole23]

1532015633193385990

[daboom1]

One juror said she hates Trump and couldnt be impartial if it related to him.

She made it on the jury.

[ChumpDumper]

One juror said she hates Trump and couldnt be impartial if it related to him.

She made it on the jury.

Sounds like Durham is a shitty lawyer tbh.

[daboom1]

Durham objected to the jurors, but the judge overruled him. Totally legit guys :tu

[ChumpDumper]

Durham objected to the jurors, but the judge overruled him. Totally legit guys :tu

Did he? Or is this just excuse making after taking a vicious L?

[Winehole23]

Bash report FOIA'd

Leaks to media, yes, but no improper unmasking requests by senior Obama officials.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/jasonleopold/heres-the-doj-report-finding-that-obama-officials-didntthis was in the can during the reign of El Trumpo, how odd it wasn't released to the public.

had to keep det narrative alive.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Not as weird as you needing to be on my nuts.

You have my concern because you are constant with the gaslighting and rape ideation. It's only predatory sociopath behavior you're trolling with. Even your "mind your own business" and trying to make it about me is textbook to the pathology.

I guess I don't have to wonder why you were divorced.

[DMC]

You have my concern because you are constant with the gaslighting and rape ideation. It's only predatory sociopath behavior you're trolling with. Even your "mind your own business" and trying to make it about me is textbook to the pathology.

I guess I don't have to wonder why you were divorced.

Fuk yo concern, clown

[spurraider21]

One juror said she hates Trump and couldnt be impartial if it related to him.

She made it on the jury.


Durham objected to the jurors, but the judge overruled him. Totally legit guys :tu
https://c.tenor.com/vWVblPEdQ5AAAAAC/kfc-chicken.gif

[ElNono]

https://c.tenor.com/vWVblPEdQ5AAAAAC/kfc-chicken.gif

[Spurs Homer]

lol

comrade TSA

[daboom1]

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1529958022822432773?t

[ChumpDumper]

:lol you can't stop crying

[Spurs Homer]

:cry:cry:cry:cry:cry



“investigate the investigators- our lying liar was telling the truth THIS TIME!”

[ElNono]

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1529958022822432773?t

https://media0.giphy.com/media/3oz8xBwn8AU6Bp1hKM/200.gif?cid=ecf05e47mpdjbcgc1ph45sa58b00pp5txhkir1 jvtgvtbtyd&rid=200.gif&ct=g

[Winehole23]

Hobnobbing with the CPSOA and dominionists to muster anti-government, paramilitary posses for Christ

Full whackadoodle political theology.

1554094582610239494

[ElNono]

Hobnobbing with the CPSOA and dominionists to muster anti-government, paramilitary posses for Christ

Full whackadoodle political theology.

1554094582610239494

Exactly, Jan 6th was simply a symptom of a much larger problem: fascism permeating the right wing at every level, including LEO and elected officials.

Complete disregard for the law, democratic processes and institutions. Primarily due to the huge butthurt of conservatism being a loser in this day and age.

[Winehole23]

Exactly, Jan 6th was simply a symptom of a much larger problem: fascism permeating the right wing at every level, including LEO and elected officials.

Complete disregard for the law, democratic processes and institutions. Primarily due to the huge butthurt of conservatism being a loser in this day and age.Really really buttsore about changing social mores. It's the literal equivalent of slavery.

[ElNono]

Really really buttsore about changing social mores. It's the literal equivalent of slavery.

On the other hand, nobody expected them to go out without a fight/tantrum. It's actually pretty ironic that their standard bearer and the person that gave them a bit of a lifeline is a life-long liberal.

[TSA]

djohn2oo8 you really want to do this brah? This thread has more pages than mine had posts.

[ChumpDumper]

Flynn was in major trouble even before he was nominated by your dumbass Trump.

MF: I'm flattered and honored by your considering me for the post of National Security Adviser. However, I must inform you that I am currently under federal investigation for being an unregistered foreign agent which is probably the worst thing for which a nominee for this job could be suspected.

Dumbass: When can you start?

[TSA]

djohn2oo8 you really want to do this brah? This thread has more pages than mine had posts.

I've got 8,000+ posts of yours in this thread alone to bump for lol's, not to mention all of your other failed Trump is going to prison threads.

Oooooh I know we can go back in this thread and find out the moment you went into hiding after Mueller failed to put Trump in prison. Maybe that will spark your memory and you can finally give an answer to where you went...if you truly didn't go into hiding.

[TSA]

https://mobile.twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1569774842131451906

The FBI paid him after they knew he lied to them. Top men :lol

[TSA]

.

[ChumpDumper]

TSA notably absent from discussion of the three current investigations into his Trump.

[Winehole23]

.:tu

[Winehole23]

https://c.tenor.com/qfAsCPqvDLMAAAAC/the-price.gif


Mr. Durham appears to be winding down his three-year inquiry without anything close to the results Mr. Trump was seeking. The grand jury that Mr. Durham has recently used to hear evidence has expired, and while he could convene another, there are currently no plans to do so, three people familiar with the matter said.

Mr. Durham and his team are working to complete a final report by the end of the year, they said, and one of the lead prosecutors on his team is leaving for a job with a prominent law firm.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/14/us/politics/durham-inquiry-trump-russia.html

[TSA]

https://c.tenor.com/qfAsCPqvDLMAAAAC/the-price.gif

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/14/us/politics/durham-inquiry-trump-russia.html

https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1570044417871908866?cxt=HHwWhMC4jYzF9ckrAAAA

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1570044417871908866?cxt=HHwWhMC4jYzF9ckrAAAA

It turned out to not be a bombshell.

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1569861190330744835

https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1569861192788676608

[ChumpDumper]

Turns out Trump is a felon who can't be trusted with state secrets.

Go figure.

[TSA]

As the prosecution opened its case against Danchenko Tuesday, ​​Special Counsel John Durham questioned his first witness, FBI supervisory intelligence analyst Brian Auten.

Auten testified that in early October 2016, the FBI offered Steele "up to $1 million" to provide corroborating evidence for his dossier, but the former British spy didn't provide any such information to the bureau. As a result, Steele wasn't given the money because he was unable to "prove the allegations."

An application the FBI submitted to a FISA court on Oct. 21, 2016 for a warrant to initiate electronic surveillance of former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page included uncorroborated information from the dossier. Auten testified that before the FBI received the dossier, it didn't have enough evidence to obtain a FISA warrant.

Auten also said the FBI contacted other intelligence agencies regarding the specific allegations in the dossier, but none were able to corroborate them.

Durham asked Auten, "On October 21, 2016 did you have any information to corroborate that information?"

"No," Auten replied.

Patel was asked about the purported reward offer on the "Just the News, No Noise" TV show Tuesday. The House Intelligence panel chaired by then-Rep. Devin Nunes sent 17 congressional subpoenas "for information specifically related to payments and confidential human sources," he said, "were denied this information, and we learn it four years after our investigation."

"That means somebody obstructed a congressional investigation with congressional subpoenas," said Patel, a former national security prosecutor.

This exposes "the depths that [the FBI] would go to to falsely corroborate the Steele dossier, which ... shows they didn't have it verified, which we've said the whole time," Patel added.

"And more importantly," he continued, "they were willing to spend a million taxpayer dollars on shoveling political hot garbage through the federal court system just to surveil a political target that would have been totally baseless — it was baseless then."

Referring to a group of senior FBI leaders during the James Comey era as "government gangsters," Patel said "this bombshell" shows that they "were so arrogant, that they said, 'Nobody is going to catch us. We are going to break a constitutional republic's 250-year tradition because we don't like the guy in the White House, and we're going to manufacture a crime on it.'"

Retired FBI supervisory special agent Bassem Youssef, one of the bureau's most famous whistleblowers, said Tuesday's revelation at the trial was unlike anything he ever saw in his three-decade FBI career.

"Never in my entire career have I heard of such an offer to pay a source to corroborate their own information," Youssef told Just the News. "The FBI queries other sources in order to validate the original source of information. It is unheard of that the FBI would offer to pay Steele $1 million to corroborate his own information.

"Obviously, the FBI was unable to validate this information through any other source that they had to resort to 'bribing' Steele to lend credibility to his own information, which the FBI knew to be inaccurate and unreliable," he added. "What a sad state of affairs in my beloved FBI."

https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/bombshell-revelation-1m-offer-steele-shows-fbi-misled

[ChumpDumper]

FBI didn't pay because it wasn't corroborated.

You wanted to kill Pence and end the Constitution.

You're much worse than the FBI.

[Spurs Homer]

Hahahahaha!

OJ still looking for the “killers”



crofl TSA

[ElNono]

So the big bad FBI are the actual witnesses to Durham? :lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao

[TSA]

So the big bad FBI are the actual witnesses to Durham? :lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao

Danchenko is charged with lying to the FBI...why would the FBI not be a witness?

[boutons_deux]

Danchenko is charged with lying to the FBI...why would the FBI not be a witness?

do you mean FBI should also be charged? your court-acceptable evidence?

[Winehole23]

whoopsie

1580558311505555456

[TSA]

whoopsie

1580558311505555456

Did you even read the article you posted? :lol

[ChumpDumper]

whoopsie

1580558311505555456

:lmao Durham's going to lose and it's all his own fault.

[ChumpDumper]

Did you even read the article you posted? :lolI did.

His inquiry is winding down after more than three years, and he has only secured one guilty plea from an FBI lawyer that resulted in zero jail time. His only other case, against a Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer, ended with a swift jury acquittal in May.

:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin: rollin

[Winehole23]

Did you even read the article you posted? :lolI did.

Durham has been unwilling to charge anyone over the stuff he grandstands about in court. Maybe the grandstanding is the whole point.

[TSA]

whoopsie

1580558311505555456

CNN is trying to frame this as undercutting Durham's case?!?! :lmao


"Auten previously said Danchenko was “truthful” and “assisted” the Russia probe. He also said securing Danchenko as an FBI source was “one of the best things that came out of” the Russia probe. This undercuts the core of Durham’s indictment, which alleged that Danchenko serially lied to the FBI and impeded the investigators who were scrambling to verify the Steele dossier.

Danchenko’s defense attorney, Danny Onorato, asked Auten in court on Wednesday if that was still his belief today, and Auten answered in the affirmative, adding, “I stand by my testimony.”

Thanks for posting the article winehole...Durham took a wet shit on Auten and the FBI.


Durham brought up the previously unknown fact that Auten was “recommended for suspension” by the FBI’s internal auditors – which wasn’t even mentioned by the defense. Auten acknowledged the recommendation, which he said is under appeal. Lawyers often bring up a witness’ past misconduct or punishments as a way to attack their credibility – but in this case, it was the prosecutor seemingly impeaching his own witness.

“You’re going to be suspended,” Durham said in one of his questions, “because you won’t admit your involvement” in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, process.

The special counsel then rebuked Auten for saying earlier that George Papadopoulos was a “high-level adviser” to Trump’s 2016 campaign. Durham accurately noted that Papadopoulos was a low-level aide, just 28 years old at the time, and still included his Model UN experience from college on his resume.


Durham took a bat to Crossfire Hurricane, which was the codename for the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe before special counsel Robert Mueller took over. The Russia probe has been a major focus of Durham’s work, and he previously criticized how it was opened. But he hasn’t brought any charges alleging bias or misconduct in the opening of Crossfire Hurricane.

“Did you guys even bother to go look at the phone records?” Durham asked, referring to the records of one of Danchenko’s potential sources for the dossier. “Did you guys even bother to look at the travel records?”

Auten said the FBI had not, to the best of his memory.

“It all had to be reconstructed,” Durham said.

“Reconstructed by whom?” Auten asked.

“Not by your group,” Durham responded, touting his team’s renewed scrutiny of Danchenko.


The special counsel also grilled Auten over his role in the FBI applications to surveil a former Trump campaign adviser, Carter Page, under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

It seemed as if Durham was using Auten’s time on the witness stand to hold him responsible for the significant mistakes and omissions in the FISA applications, which were revealed by the Justice Department inspector general in a 2019 report. Durham called it a “scathing report,” but was forced to rephrase his question after Danchenko’s lawyers objected to his characterization.

Durham said the FBI was “much too ready, willing and able just to accept” Steele’s claims and include them in the FISA warrant applications. The trial has established that FBI agents recycled Steele’s material in FISA renewals, even as their efforts to corroborate his work fell flat.


whoopsie

[TSA]

I did.

Durham has been unwilling to charge anyone over the stuff he grandstands about in court. Maybe the grandstanding is the whole point.

If you did indeed read it what's then what is the "whoopsie"?

[ChumpDumper]

Yep, Durham sure did everything he could do discredit his own witness and destroy his own case.:lmao

wh:lol:lolpsie

[Winehole23]

If you did indeed read it what's then what is the "whoopsie"?Durham attacked his own lead witness on the stand because he hurt the case before the court. Durham basically got caught mischaracterizing his own witness's beliefs.

[TSA]

Durham attacked his own lead witness on the stand because he hurt the case before the court. Durham basically got caught mischaracterizing his own witness's beliefs.:rollin

[ChumpDumper]

:lol what does TSA think is happening here?

[Winehole23]

:lol what does TSA think is happening here?he thinks everything he posts backs up his creedal bullshit, obviously

[ChumpDumper]

he thinks everything he posts backs up his creedal bullshit, obviouslyI mean his last gasp is a trial in which the FBI is the nominal victim of the crime.

[TSA]

whoopsie

1580558311505555456

https://twitter.com/realtoriabrooke/status/1580218736031645697

Here's a play by play from day 2 with Auten. Durham obliterates him.


Many of Durham’s actions Wednesday vindicated his critics’ main complaint – that he has used his trials to push a dubious narrative of intentional government misconduct against Trump, and of a far-reaching conspiracy by Democrats to smear Trump, without ever actually charging it.

Going to have to agree with CNN and Durham's critics...he has put the intentional government misconduct on full display.

[TSA]

ChumpDumper begging for a middleman assist from Winehole to get his posts visible to me :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

I quote your dumbass posts so people know what I'm mocking, you pizzagate QAnon rube.

You don't understand that Auten is Durham's witness and Durham is fucking himself.

Hillary broke you and she didn't even win.:lmao

[Spurs Homer]

Durham announces to the planet:

“yes- i am nothing but a trumper with an agenda to do trump and barrs bidding”


lololololol9l

[Spurs Homer]

Has OJ found the “killers” yet - comrade TSA?

bwahahahahahahahaha!

[ElNono]

So the big bad FBI are the actual witnesses to Durham? :lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao


Danchenko is charged with lying to the FBI...why would the FBI not be a witness?

So that's a YES SIR YES

[TSA]

So that's a YES SIR YES
So then what's with the 5 lmao emojis in a row?

[ElNono]

So then what's with the 5 lmao emojis in a row?

I think the fact that he has no case without the big bad FBI is hilarious, especially in light of the well documented disdain for the feds you've displayed here.

[TSA]

I think the fact that he has no case without the big bad FBI is hilarious, especially in light of the well documented disdain for the feds you've displayed here.

It’s hilarious you think he thinks he needs the big bad FBI. He hung them out to dry today. I’m not sure he actually gives a fuck about Danchenko, its looking like he’s more interested in publicly airing out all the dirty laundry of the FBI/DOJ.

[ElNono]

It’s hilarious you think he thinks he needs the big bad FBI. He hung them out to dry today. I’m not sure he actually gives a fuck about Danchenko, its looking like he’s more interested in publicly airing out all the dirty laundry of the FBI/DOJ.

If he didn't need them, then they wouldn't be his witnesses and if he had any dirt on the FBI, they'll be on trial, not on the witness stand. But I'm good if he wants to lose this case too, just like the last one.... :tu

[Winehole23]

If he didn't need them, then they wouldn't be his witnesses and if he had any dirt on the FBI, they'll be on trial, not on the witness stand. But I'm good if he wants to lose this case too, just like the last one.... :tulosing two federal jury trials within a few months would be quite the accomplishment, tbh

[ChumpDumper]

The important takeaway here is that Durham went down losing by his own impotent rage.

[ElNono]

The important takeaway here is that Durham went down losing by his own impotent rage.

I have no reason to believe Durham didn't do his best and dug as deep as needed. Considering nobody is or has been in jail over this (we'll see about Danchenko), I guess it just was a nothingburger.

It happens.

[Ef-man]

losing two federal jury trials within a few months would be quite the accomplishment, tbh

Only the best. :lol

[Spurs Homer]

OJ didnt find the “killers?”



:lmao:lmao TSA

[spurraider21]

1581004532150304769

inb4 TSA spins this as an epic win for durham

[Winehole23]

1581004532150304769

inb4 TSA spins this as an epic win for durhamdang, Durham skipped elements of the crime

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1581438293773688832

https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1581440461331648512

[ChumpDumper]

Trump tried to have his Vice-President murdered and this is your focus.

[ElNono]

https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1581438293773688832

https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1581440461331648512

Those statements are actually consistent with the Steele Dossier not being in Mueller's "purview"... thus, where's the lie?

Techn:lolf:lolg

[ElNono]

Durham was vague about why FBI agents working on the Mueller probe didn’t pursue leads he said they should have, such as by tracking down phone and travel records. Some FBI personnel who testified said they wanted to open an investigation into Dolan, but were rebuffed by superiors.

“For whatever reason, there is a certain mindset that agents did not do what they should have done,” Durham told the jurors, without elaborating. While repeatedly raising such episodes, prosecutors insisted they were ultimately irrelevant to the case against Danchenko.

Defenders of the FBI probe have argued that, whatever the criticism of the bureau’s handling of the Steele dossier, that report was a relatively small part of the overall Trump-Russia investigation, which was well underway by the time the dossier surfaced.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/10/17/jury-danchenko-case-durhams-swan-song-00062146

[TSA]

Those statements are actually consistent with the Steele Dossier not being in Mueller's "purview"... thus, where's the lie?

Techn:lolf:lolg

The Testimony of Former FBI Intelligence Analyst Brittany Hertzog

Hertzog was with the FBI from 2008 through 2019 as an intelligence analyst with a primary focus on Russian counterintelligence. She described her role as an analyst who “looks at information and tries to identify trends, patterns, and investigative next steps.” She was assigned to the Directorate of Intelligence at FBI Headquarters.

Hertzog was assigned to Special Counsel Mueller’s Office in July 2017. She described her role and chain of command with the Mueller Team:

Q And what, generally, was your role with the Special Counsel Mueller's team?

A I was primarily initially to focus on looking into reports that the FBI had received on Russian matters.

Q All right. Did those reports have a particular name?

A We referred to them typically as the Steele dossier.

Q Now, as a member of Special Counsel Mueller's team, was there a chain of command?

A Yes.

Q Can you describe the chain of command that you worked with?

A I reported directly to SIA Brian Auten. Above him was Special Counsel Mueller. There were horizontal chains of reporting as well. So there was an attorney, a supervisory special agent, and then head of FBI personnel.

Q Okay. So you had occasion to work with special agents as well, correct?

A Correct.

Q And who were some of the special agents that you worked with Special Counsel Mueller?

A I worked with Supervisory Special Agent Amy Anderson and Supervisory Special Agent Joe Nelson.

Hertzog became familiar with the Steele Dossier, and with the parties involved in the Steele Dossier, once she joined the Mueller Team:

Q And how did you become familiar with Mr. Steele?

A When I reported [July 2017] to the Special Counsel's Office, SCO, I had received background information on the investigation up until that point.

It was her job to “look into the Steele Dossier.” She described this as “trying to identify the sourcing for the claims in the dossier and, specifically, the national security threat with regards to the Russian influence piece.” Hertzog explains:

Q And a lot of names appeared in those dossier reports?

A Correct.

Q Did you learn that there were a number of different sources that the defendant relied on?

A Yes.

Q Did you have a particular focus on any of those sources?

A There were a number of sub-sources that were identified for investigative next steps.

Q Okay. And did you have a particular individual that you focused on?

A Yes. There was an individual named Olga Galkina who was -- when I was assigned to SCO, was my primary focus initially.

Compare Hertzog’s testimony to the words of Robert Mueller:

3YKWAmtXdZA

The Testimony of FBI Special Agent Amy Anderson

Agent Anderson, who works in the field of counterintelligence, was part of the Crossfire Hurricane/Mueller Team from April 2017 through January of 2018. Her initial assignment was “to attempt to validate the Steele Dossier,” to “either verify the reporting or determine that it was not accurate.”

Anderson described her role and supervisors with Special Counsel Mueller:

Q What was your initial -- who were you initially working with in that role at the Special Counsel's investigation?

A When I first arrived at the Special Counsel, I worked with Supervisory Intelligence Analyst Brian Auten, as well as quite a few other intelligence analysts, Stephanie LaParre, Iva Drasinover. We had a team that was working the dossier in particular.

Q Did you work with someone by the name of Brittany Hertzog?

A I worked with Brittany a little bit later. She came in not at the very beginning but maybe a month after, a month or two.

Q And in terms of who you reported to at the Special Counsel's office, if you could, just tell us who you reported to.

A Technically, I reported to Supervisory Special Agent Joe Nelson.

Anderson said she was interested in Dolan in particular, given his connection to Galkina and Danchenko:

Q And how did you learn of the connection between Mr. Dolan to Ms. Galkina and the defendant?

A I believe it was also database checks, and Ms. Galkina did tell us that she knew him -- both of them.

Q And learning of Mr. Dolan's connection to the two individuals, what did you do with respect to Mr. Dolan? Did you look into him?

A I wanted to look into him.

She also wanted to speak to Danchenko. But she had to do that through Agent Helson, Danchenko’s handler. Here’s how that process worked:

Q And just briefly explain to the jury how it might work. If you wanted to get information from Mr. Danchenko, how would you go about getting that?

A I would speak to the source handler. So in this case, I would speak to Agent Helson, and we would discuss what might be interesting for us to know. And then he would go and speak to his source. We do that for reasons of source safety, so that not everyone knows who our sources are.

Agent Anderson would eventually fly to Cyprus with Auten to interview Olga Galkina. She said Galkina was mostly forthcoming, except when it came to discussing Charles Dolan:

Q And did you interview with her all days?

A Yes, we did three days.

Q And would you characterize Ms. Galkina as forthcoming with her information about her role with the dossier and any information in it?

A She seemed mostly forthcoming.

Q You said mostly forthcoming. Was there a particular area that she was not forthcoming about?

A Yes. She was hesitant in telling us about Mr. Dolan.

Q All right. Let's start with the beginning of these interviews. When you began interviewing Ms. Galkina, did you specifically ask her about Mr. Dolan or not?

A We did.

Q And if you could, how did she react when you asked her about Mr. Dolan the first time?

A She did not want to speak about him.

But Anderson kept pressing and eventually straight-up asked if Dolan had a connection with the Steele Dossier. At that point, Galkina admitted Dolan’s involvement:
Agent Anderson then prepared a report of the interviews and compiled a report on everything that she and Analyst Hertzog had compiled on Charles Dolan. That report was submitted to her supervisor, Supervisory Special Agent Joe Nelson.

https://technofog.substack.com/p/igor-danchenko-trial-revelations

ElN:loln:lol

[Spurminator]

Jesus Christ dude, get a hobby.

[TSA]

Jesus Christ dude, get a hobby.

Like creating an alt and talking to myself, that kind of hobby?

[ElNono]

The Testimony of Former FBI Intelligence Analyst Brittany Hertzog

Hertzog was with the FBI from 2008 through 2019 as an intelligence analyst with a primary focus on Russian counterintelligence. She described her role as an analyst who “looks at information and tries to identify trends, patterns, and investigative next steps.” She was assigned to the Directorate of Intelligence at FBI Headquarters.

Hertzog was assigned to Special Counsel Mueller’s Office in July 2017. She described her role and chain of command with the Mueller Team:

Q And what, generally, was your role with the Special Counsel Mueller's team?

A I was primarily initially to focus on looking into reports that the FBI had received on Russian matters.

Q All right. Did those reports have a particular name?

A We referred to them typically as the Steele dossier.

Q Now, as a member of Special Counsel Mueller's team, was there a chain of command?

A Yes.

Q Can you describe the chain of command that you worked with?

A I reported directly to SIA Brian Auten. Above him was Special Counsel Mueller. There were horizontal chains of reporting as well. So there was an attorney, a supervisory special agent, and then head of FBI personnel.

Q Okay. So you had occasion to work with special agents as well, correct?

A Correct.

Q And who were some of the special agents that you worked with Special Counsel Mueller?

A I worked with Supervisory Special Agent Amy Anderson and Supervisory Special Agent Joe Nelson.

Hertzog became familiar with the Steele Dossier, and with the parties involved in the Steele Dossier, once she joined the Mueller Team:

Q And how did you become familiar with Mr. Steele?

A When I reported [July 2017] to the Special Counsel's Office, SCO, I had received background information on the investigation up until that point.

It was her job to “look into the Steele Dossier.” She described this as “trying to identify the sourcing for the claims in the dossier and, specifically, the national security threat with regards to the Russian influence piece.” Hertzog explains:

Q And a lot of names appeared in those dossier reports?

A Correct.

Q Did you learn that there were a number of different sources that the defendant relied on?

A Yes.

Q Did you have a particular focus on any of those sources?

A There were a number of sub-sources that were identified for investigative next steps.

Q Okay. And did you have a particular individual that you focused on?

A Yes. There was an individual named Olga Galkina who was -- when I was assigned to SCO, was my primary focus initially.

Compare Hertzog’s testimony to the words of Robert Mueller:

3YKWAmtXdZA

The Testimony of FBI Special Agent Amy Anderson

Agent Anderson, who works in the field of counterintelligence, was part of the Crossfire Hurricane/Mueller Team from April 2017 through January of 2018. Her initial assignment was “to attempt to validate the Steele Dossier,” to “either verify the reporting or determine that it was not accurate.”

Anderson described her role and supervisors with Special Counsel Mueller:

Q What was your initial -- who were you initially working with in that role at the Special Counsel's investigation?

A When I first arrived at the Special Counsel, I worked with Supervisory Intelligence Analyst Brian Auten, as well as quite a few other intelligence analysts, Stephanie LaParre, Iva Drasinover. We had a team that was working the dossier in particular.

Q Did you work with someone by the name of Brittany Hertzog?

A I worked with Brittany a little bit later. She came in not at the very beginning but maybe a month after, a month or two.

Q And in terms of who you reported to at the Special Counsel's office, if you could, just tell us who you reported to.

A Technically, I reported to Supervisory Special Agent Joe Nelson.

Anderson said she was interested in Dolan in particular, given his connection to Galkina and Danchenko:

Q And how did you learn of the connection between Mr. Dolan to Ms. Galkina and the defendant?

A I believe it was also database checks, and Ms. Galkina did tell us that she knew him -- both of them.

Q And learning of Mr. Dolan's connection to the two individuals, what did you do with respect to Mr. Dolan? Did you look into him?

A I wanted to look into him.

She also wanted to speak to Danchenko. But she had to do that through Agent Helson, Danchenko’s handler. Here’s how that process worked:

Q And just briefly explain to the jury how it might work. If you wanted to get information from Mr. Danchenko, how would you go about getting that?

A I would speak to the source handler. So in this case, I would speak to Agent Helson, and we would discuss what might be interesting for us to know. And then he would go and speak to his source. We do that for reasons of source safety, so that not everyone knows who our sources are.

Agent Anderson would eventually fly to Cyprus with Auten to interview Olga Galkina. She said Galkina was mostly forthcoming, except when it came to discussing Charles Dolan:

Q And did you interview with her all days?

A Yes, we did three days.

Q And would you characterize Ms. Galkina as forthcoming with her information about her role with the dossier and any information in it?

A She seemed mostly forthcoming.

Q You said mostly forthcoming. Was there a particular area that she was not forthcoming about?

A Yes. She was hesitant in telling us about Mr. Dolan.

Q All right. Let's start with the beginning of these interviews. When you began interviewing Ms. Galkina, did you specifically ask her about Mr. Dolan or not?

A We did.

Q And if you could, how did she react when you asked her about Mr. Dolan the first time?

A She did not want to speak about him.

But Anderson kept pressing and eventually straight-up asked if Dolan had a connection with the Steele Dossier. At that point, Galkina admitted Dolan’s involvement:
Agent Anderson then prepared a report of the interviews and compiled a report on everything that she and Analyst Hertzog had compiled on Charles Dolan. That report was submitted to her supervisor, Supervisory Special Agent Joe Nelson.

https://technofog.substack.com/p/igor-danchenko-trial-revelations

ElN:loln:lol

:lmao having to fill in the dots because it's not on the interview, and he can't post a straight quote

Techn:lolf:lolg

[TSA]

:lmao having to fill in the dots because it's not on the interview, and he can't post a straight quote

Techn:lolf:lolg

Q And what, generally, was your role with the Special Counsel Mueller's team?

A I was primarily initially to focus on looking into reports that the FBI had received on Russian matters.

Q All right. Did those reports have a particular name?

A We referred to them typically as the Steele dossier.


ElN:rollinn:rollin

[Winehole23]

Danchenko not guilty on all counts

1582468759167463425

[spurraider21]

:lmao

[Winehole23]

https://i.imgflip.com/6i69wq.jpg

[spurraider21]

am i missing anything from Durham's prosecutions?

Clinesmith - pled guilty, no prison time

Sussman - acquitted

Danchenko - acquitted

[Spurminator]

Where did the "Podesta eats people with the Clintons" case end up?

[Winehole23]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FfYT7J-WYBAxX3g?format=png&name=medium

[TSA]

I’m not sure he actually gives a fuck about Danchenko, its looking like he’s more interested in publicly airing out all the dirty laundry of the FBI/DOJ.

:bobo

[Winehole23]

https://media2.giphy.com/media/ZZO4GlQRTD7J4BHtRG/giphy.gif

[ChumpDumper]

TSA thinks it was a show trial.:lol

Durham just could've gone on Tucker and gotten a more effective result.

All he's done is fail.

[Winehole23]

am i missing anything from Durham's prosecutions?

Clinesmith - pled guilty, no prison time

Sussman - acquitted

Danchenko - acquittedsome say the IG should get credit for Clinesmith

1582478013043990530

[ChumpDumper]

some say the IG should get credit for Clinesmith

1582478013043990530

Baylor's next president.

[Spurs Homer]

Trump still looking for the "killers?"



:lmao:lmao:rollin:rollin


comrade TSA - still fighting for mother russia - and still unable to see how trump is and will always be a fucking traitor russian asset!

[spurraider21]

heads i win tails you lose
Sad!

[Ef-man]

:lmao having to fill in the dots because it's not on the interview, and he can't post a straight quote

Techn:lolf:lolg

You will need to fill in the blanks on what acquitted means as tsa will not understand, just saying.

[ElNono]

Q And what, generally, was your role with the Special Counsel Mueller's team?

A I was primarily initially to focus on looking into reports that the FBI had received on Russian matters.

Q All right. Did those reports have a particular name?

A We referred to them typically as the Steele dossier.

ElN:rollinn:rollin

That's only part of the story. You neglected the part that when they were going to dig into Nolan, etc, they were told by the Mueller team not to, which is the part Technofag made up

Techn:lolf:lolg

[ElNono]

So what laundry was aired publicly? :lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao

That Durham and his investigation has been a failure is pretty clear, what else? lmao

[ElNono]

am i missing anything from Durham's prosecutions?

Clinesmith - pled guilty, no prison time

Sussman - acquitted

Danchenko - acquitted

Not missing a thing, tbh.... but that was expected since Mueller took on all the big fish...

[spurraider21]

:lmao patriots.win having a normal one (formerly thedonald.win)

https://i.gyazo.com/1e4b0d5c37b70d64a79e2237b01c9add.png

[spurraider21]

:lmao durham is losing on purpose as part of the cover-up!

[Winehole23]

1582475771540406272

[Winehole23]

Mueller investigation: 37 indictments, 7 guilty pleas or convictions, 14 criminal referrals.

Durham investigation: 1 guilty plea without jail time, 2 acquittals.

[spurraider21]

Mueller investigation: 37 indictments, 7 guilty pleas or convictions, 14 criminal referrals.

Durham investigation: 1 guilty plea without jail time, 2 acquittals.
not to mention for mueller multiple were handed prison sentences

[Spurs Homer]

Mueller investigation: 37 indictments, 7 guilty pleas or convictions, 14 criminal referrals.

Durham investigation: 1 guilty plea without jail time, 2 acquittals.


not to mention….


all the complicit traitors that lied for russia

the corrupt attorney general running interference

the corrupt use/shielding of the office of the presidency

the corrupt complicit GOP who also shielded the traitors and lied to the base about russia and is still lying to the base about the coup

[pgardn]

Like creating an alt and talking to myself, that kind of hobby?

TSA: Next Pizza up!

[Ef-man]

TSA: Next Pizza up!

More like tsa will be in Korea, busy working 24/7 and without internet for several months.

[TSA]

That's only part of the story. You neglected the part that when they were going to dig into Nolan, etc, they were told by the Mueller team not to, which is the part Technofag made up

Techn:lolf:lolg

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:s teep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F 86960e22-6a29-4fd8-b4de-bc35afa9f63c_624x334.png

ElN:loln:lol

[Winehole23]

sorry for your loss

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/976/084/33d.gif

[ElNono]

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:s teep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F 86960e22-6a29-4fd8-b4de-bc35afa9f63c_624x334.png

ElN:loln:lol

:lmao that's exactly what I've been pointing out. You can't claim Mueller investigated the dossier when it told the FBI not to pursue it.

Techn:lolf:lolg

[spurraider21]

HOROWITZ IS COMING

DURHAM IS COMING

end result, one guy pleads guilty to no jail time, 2 outright acquittals, and horowitz found there was proper factual predicate for the russia investigation

:lmao

[Winehole23]

The jury in Danchenko’s case deliberated for about nine hours over two days. Juror Joel Greene said in an interview that there were no holdouts in the deliberations and that jurors were “pretty unanimous” in how they viewed the case.

“We looked at everything really closely,” said Greene, who declined to comment on the politics of the case. “The conclusion we reached was the conclusion we all were able to reach.”https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/18/igor-danchenko-john-durham-verdict/

[TSA]

:lmao that's exactly what I've been pointing out. You can't claim Mueller investigated the dossier when it told the FBI not to pursue it.

Techn:lolf:lolgThis has all been testimony from Mueller's team. Mueller's team investigated the dossier for months :rollin

Q What was your initial -- who were you initially working with in that role at the Special Counsel's investigation?

A When I first arrived at the Special Counsel, I worked with Supervisory Intelligence Analyst Brian Auten, as well as quite a few other intelligence analysts, Stephanie LaParre, Iva Drasinover. We had a team that was working the dossier in particular.

Q Did you work with someone by the name of Brittany Hertzog?

A I worked with Brittany a little bit later. She came in not at the very beginning but maybe a month after, a month or two.

ElN:loln:lol

[Monostradamus]

:lol You thought Pizzagate was real
:lmao

[TSA]

The corrupt FBI was also on trial in federal court where Igor Danchenko was being tried for making false statements.

Igor Danchenko was acquitted in federal court Tuesday on all four counts of lying to the FBI about where he obtained the phony information that he secretly fed to ex-British spy Christopher Steele for his fictive dossier that smeared Donald Trump as a Russian asset. The loss is another setback for special counsel John Durham, but the verdict comes as no surprise.

The case was tried in Alexandria, Virginia where 80% of residents voted Democrat in the last presidential election. In a politically charged case involving names like Trump and Clinton, it was always an uphill battle for Durham, just as it was in the earlier trial of Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann who was acquitted by a Washington, D.C. jury in a district where 92% of voters cast ballots for Biden in the last election and a scant 5% for Trump. But the not guilty verdicts are a minor footnote in the sordid story of the greatest mass delusion in American political history.

The Virginia trial was never really about Danchenko at all. Sure, he was the named defendant. But as testimony unfolded it was obvious that he was a conduit for a worthier ambition —a damning indictment of the FBI’s gross misconduct.

Durham candidly admitted it to the jury during his closing argument when he referred to the bureau as "the elephant in the room."

In reality, the crooked FBI was in the dock throughout the weeklong trial, exposed for its years of shameful lies, shocking corruption, and devious cover-ups.

It was former Director James Comey and his sleazy confederates who colluded with the Hillary Clinton campaign to falsely accuse Trump of colluding with Russia. They framed him for alleged crimes he never committed.

The genesis of the lies came from Hillary herself, according to declassified documents. In the run-up to 2016 presidential election, she personally approved a plan to defame her political opponent as a clandestine Russian mole. Her campaign manager, Robby Mook, confirmed it in an earlier trial five months ago.

But that’s not all. Clinton’s acolytes covertly funded the specious dossier authored by the now-disgraced Steele who was already pocketing cash while on the FBI payroll. Hillary’s cronies and political operatives not only furnished the fabricated garbage in the document, but they disseminated it to the Trump-loathing media. With the FBI as witting accessories, the Russia hoax took flight and a dilating witch hunt ensued.

Any intelligent person who has ever read Steele’s preposterous report knew immediately that it was bogus. It read like a dime novel penned by a halfwit.

Naturally, the geniuses in the liberal mainstream media thought it was real. Blinded by their own bias and contempt for Trump, they accepted it as gospel and reported it as such, never bothering to verify any of it. But the FBI knew better.

Early on, the agency easily debunked much of it as demonstrably false. Yet, in October of 2016 they offered Steele a reward of $1 million dollars —the equivalent of a bounty on Trump’s head— if only the former spook would corroborate its contents. Steele could not, of course, because it is impossible to prove the truth of a lie.

Russian national Igor Danchenko was acquitted in federal court on Tuesday on four counts of lying to the FBI. ( )

Although the bureau was unable to verify the dossier, that did not stop the FBI from exploiting it. That same month, Comey signed a warrant application to spy on the Trump campaign by vowing under oath to the FISA court that the faux document was "verified" even though it was not.

He further represented to the judge that the dossier was "credible" and that Steele was "reliable," intentionally omitting the vital fact that Steele had been fired by the FBI for lying.

Russian national Igor Danchenko was acquitted in federal court on Tuesday on four counts of lying to the FBI. ( )

Although the bureau was unable to verify the dossier, that did not stop the FBI from exploiting it. That same month, Comey signed a warrant application to spy on the Trump campaign by vowing under oath to the FISA court that the faux document was "verified" even though it was not.

He further represented to the judge that the dossier was "credible" and that Steele was "reliable," intentionally omitting the vital fact that Steele had been fired by the FBI for lying.

As Democrats and the media proceeded to convict Trump in the court of public opinion, the sanctimonious Comey and others at the bureau remained mute and happily watched as their nemesis struggled to defend himself.

They continued peddling lies to the FISA court while withholding from both congress and the public their exculpatory evidence that Trump was innocent.

Collusion was a hallucination they helped propagate. They concealed Danchenko’s admission that the dossier was a collection of idle rumors, innuendos, multiple hearsay, and —literally— gossip in a bar. Instead, behind the scenes the FBI manipulated the narrative to depict the president as guilty of conspiring with Russia. Comey, Clinton and others colluded to frame him and evict him from office.

There were countless other acts of misfeasance and malfeasance by the FBI, all of which were driven by the agency’s unabashed hatred of Trump.

They weaponized the law for partisan purposes and politicized our nation’s justice systems. To some extent, they succeeded.

Through their abuse of power they managed to convince tens of millions of citizens that the president was a traitor without a shred of evidence.

There was never any credible evidence that Trump was a Russian agent. There were no seditious acts that he cooked up with the Kremlin or some nefarious cabal to steal the 2016 election.

It was all a damning fiction that constitutes what is surely the dirtiest political trick ever perpetrated in politics.

Special counsel Durham should be commended for his dogged pursuit of the truth. He may have lost the trial, but he succeeded in unraveling a multitude of pernicious lies.

He exposed how a malignant force of unelected officials committed uncommon corruption through insipid deceptions and malevolent acts. They subverted our rules of law and undermined the democratic process. By their venal acts, they damaged the institutions of American government. And they squandered the nation’s trust.

Comey and his miserable minions may be gone from the FBI, but the wretched rot lingers.


https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/danchenko-acquitted-comey-fbi-guilty-perpetrating-russia-hoax

[Winehole23]

Except, the FBI wasn't on trial. Danchenko was.

[spurraider21]

:lmao gregg jarrett op-ed

[spurraider21]

In August 2017, Jarrett called for a grand jury for Hillary Clinton over her email controversy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controversy).[7] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregg_Jarrett#cite_note-:2-7) A day later, when a grand jury was impaneled by special counsel Robert Mueller (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Mueller) in the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_ele ctions), Jarrett said that grand juries were an "undemocratic farce".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregg_Jarrett

[Spurs Homer]

:lmao:rollin:lmao:rollin

greg jarret fox “news”. OPINION

[Spurs Homer]

Bannon headed for prison…

more charges pending elsewhere…

just a start of prison life for this traitor-


ALL THE BEST PEOPLE!

[ElNono]

This has all been testimony from Mueller's team. Mueller's team investigated the dossier for months :rollin

Q What was your initial -- who were you initially working with in that role at the Special Counsel's investigation?

A When I first arrived at the Special Counsel, I worked with Supervisory Intelligence Analyst Brian Auten, as well as quite a few other intelligence analysts, Stephanie LaParre, Iva Drasinover. We had a team that was working the dossier in particular.

Q Did you work with someone by the name of Brittany Hertzog?

A I worked with Brittany a little bit later. She came in not at the very beginning but maybe a month after, a month or two.

ElN:loln:lol

That it wasn’t in their ‘purview’ doesn’t mean they didn’t look at it all, it simply means it wasn’t pursued as an integral part of the investigation, which, given Mueller’s now known report and the tacit admission here that leads like Dolan were not pursued, prove that statement correct.

You can’t have it both ways. You can’t claim Mueller based parts of his report on the dossier and then turn around and complain, like Durham, that this stuff wasn’t followed. In any case, as the jury found, Durham was wrong.

Techn:lolf:lolg

[ElNono]

The corrupt FBI was also on trial in federal court where Igor Danchenko was being tried for making false statements.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/danchenko-acquitted-comey-fbi-guilty-perpetrating-russia-hoax

This is fake news

[spurraider21]

This is fake news
Of course. It’s a Gregg jarrett op ed

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/15poundstogo/status/1617554097158213633

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/mgEyesOpen/status/1617554410116190211

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/HansMahncke/status/1617554903920001025

https://twitter.com/TrustIsEarnd/status/1617561498821312523

[Spurs Homer]

So he was on trump /russia team and helped mother russia also?



:lmao:lmao


comrade TSA still working for russia 24/7

[Spurs Homer]

So this guy did what trump did routinely- ACCEPT MONEY FROM FOREIGN AGENTS and hide it all while using his position/office to enrich himself and to also work from the inside to help this foreign actor against the interests of the usa…

just like flynn working for turkey and russia
and bannon
and julie-yanni

et al

and the FBI busted his ass and he will be prosecuted just like trump should be;


https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/retired-fbi-executive-charged-concealing-225000-cash-received-outside-source



good for the integrity of the FBI

[TSA]

So he was on trump /russia team and helped mother russia also?

Only a dipshit would come to that conclusion.

[Spurs Homer]

Only a dipshit would come to that conclusion.

He was laundering money from enemies cash - just like all your heroes in the treason administration - and the FBI busted him - just like all the other traitors you defend -

pretty simple actually, and kudos to the FBI agents who have stayed true to the usa - even when they bust one of their own agents -

and any news from Durham investigating the investigators?

lol comrade traitor TSA

[spurraider21]

Only a dipshit would come to that conclusion.
only a dipshit would believe pizzagate was real

[ElNono]

FBI getting it done :tu

[TSA]

only a dipshit would believe pizzagate was real

only a dipshit would believe Russiagate was real.

[Ef-man]

He was laundering money from enemies cash - just like all your heroes in the treason administration - and the FBI busted him - just like all the other traitors you defend -

pretty simple actually, and kudos to the FBI agents who have stayed true to the usa - even when they bust one of their own agents -

and any news from Durham investigating the investigators?

lol comrade traitor TSA

:lol TSA self-owned

[Winehole23]

Only a dipshit would come to that conclusion.what conclusions do you draw?

DOJ thinks it can prove money laundering, illegal lobbying for Deripaska. Allegedly McGonigal concealed a quarter mil in payments from a former Albanian intelligence dude.

[TSA]

what conclusions do you draw?

DOJ thinks it can prove money laundering, illegal lobbying for Deripaska. Allegedly McGonigal concealed a quarter mil in payments from a former Russian intelligence dude.

He wasn't on Trump team as dipshit Spurs Homer claimed.

[spurraider21]

only a dipshit would believe Russiagate was real.
Define russiagate

[Winehole23]

He wasn't on Trump team as dipshit Spurs Homer claimed.yet he ended up working for Kushner's property group.

[Spurs Homer]

He wasn't on Trump team as dipshit Spurs Homer claimed.

obviously he was on RUSSIA team- no different than you- no different than trump

FBI agents being TURNED by russia
a president being TURNED. by russia
trump/russia supporters being TURNED BY RUSSIA

ALL against the interests of the USA is a horrible problem.

FBI prosecuting every last one of them- the trumps/flynns/carter page/ et al

is a start to CLEANSING our democracy from traitors like you who CONTINUE to spew russian propaganda like

”russian hoax”
”russiagate”

stupid cultists

any news on the DURHAM - UNCOVERING the hoax and exposing the “investigators?”

lol comrade TSA

[TSA]

obviously he was on RUSSIA team- no different than you- no different than trump

FBI agents being TURNED by russia
a president being TURNED. by russia
trump/russia supporters being TURNED BY RUSSIA

ALL against the interests of the USA is a horrible problem.

FBI prosecuting every last one of them- the trumps/flynns/carter page/ et al

is a start to CLEANSING our democracy from traitors like you who CONTINUE to spew russian propaganda like

”russian hoax”
”russiagate”

stupid cultists

any news on the DURHAM - UNCOVERING the hoax and exposing the “investigators?”

lol comrade TSA

:lol unhinged

[TSA]

yet he ended up working for Kushner's property group.

:lol no he didn't

[TSA]

Define russiagate

Trump and team colluded with Russia before the election to sway it, Trump secretly worked for Russia, Trump was a Russian agent etc.

[BD24]

Jesus Christ. Didn’t realize this shit ended up going over 2k pages. The Ukraine thread is huge and is only about half of this :lol

[TSA]

Jesus Christ. Didn’t realize this shit ended up going over 2k pages. The Ukraine thread is huge and is only about half of this :lol

Where did OP djohn2oo8 go?

[Winehole23]

:lol no he didn'tmy bad, he was the senior VP of the company that bought Kushner's white elephant at 666 Fifth Ave.

[TSA]

my bad, he was the senior VP of the company that bought Kushner's white elephant at 666 Fifth Ave.

Thought you had a gotcha :rollin

[Spurs Homer]

Thought you had a gotcha :rollin

so- jared getting bailed by suadis, emirates and helped by russians to get into the white house and paid two billion after leaving white house is all ok with you amirite?

[Winehole23]

Thought you had a gotcha :rollinNah, just a crossed wire. I scan things too quickly sometimes, my powers of reading aren't perfect.

[TSA]

Nah, just a crossed wire. I scan things too quickly sometimes, my powers of reading aren't perfect.

Next time take a breath before racing to post a gotcha on spurstalk.

[Ef-man]

https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1617971405278285824

[TSA]

That it wasn’t in their ‘purview’ doesn’t mean they didn’t look at it all, it simply means it wasn’t pursued as an integral part of the investigation, which, given Mueller’s now known report and the tacit admission here that leads like Dolan were not pursued, prove that statement correct.

You can’t have it both ways. You can’t claim Mueller based parts of his report on the dossier and then turn around and complain, like Durham, that this stuff wasn’t followed. In any case, as the jury found, Durham was wrong.

Techn:lolf:lolg

When did I claim Mueller based parts of his report on the dossier? You claimed Mueller never investigated the dossier. Mueller had a team investigating the dossier for months. Just take the L and move on.

[TSA]

So he was on trump /russia team and helped mother russia also?



:lmao:lmao


comrade TSA still working for russia 24/7

https://twitter.com/VinceCoglianese/status/1617944294731681793

:rollin

[spurraider21]

we already know the probe was not a "hoax"

horowitz report said the investigation was started for proper purpose or proper factual predicate or whatever

just because an investigation comes up dry doesnt make it a "hoax". and of course, "coming up dry" is not entirely accurate. they found contacts, just insufficient evidence to move forward. but that was also blamed at least in part of the efforts to obstruct the investigation, something they specifically said they could not exonerate the campaign of

[TSA]

we already know the probe was not a "hoax"

horowitz report said the investigation was started for proper purpose or proper factual predicate or whatever

just because an investigation comes up dry doesnt make it a "hoax". and of course, "coming up dry" is not entirely accurate. they found contacts, just insufficient evidence to move forward. but that was also blamed at least in part of the efforts to obstruct the investigation, something they specifically said they could not exonerate the campaign of

lol you didn't even touch on what I said was Russiagate.


Trump and team colluded with Russia before the election to sway it, Trump secretly worked for Russia, Trump was a Russian agent etc.

"Russiagate" was a coordinated hit job by MSM/democrats/intelligence community (leaking documents to friendly media) to try and take out Trump. I didn't even bring up the Mueller investigation.

Why would you focus on the Mueller investigation and totally ignore the 24/7 news cycle of Trump was a Russian agent?

[spurraider21]

lol you didn't even touch on what I said was Russiagate.
i responded to the post directly above mine

[TSA]

i responded to the post directly above mine

huh? what post directly above yours?

[spurraider21]

huh? what post directly above yours?
click this link to go to my post. then scroll up one post. that would be the one directly above it.

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=266387&page=2088&p=10855949&viewfull=1#post10855949

[TSA]

click this link to go to my post. then scroll up one post. that would be the one directly above it.

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=266387&page=2088&p=10855949&viewfull=1#post10855949

The post with me laughing at Spurs Homer?

[spurraider21]

The post with me laughing at Spurs Homer?
yes. including the tweet that says "proves trump/russia collusion probe not a 'hoax'"

to which my comment was directed. its why i led with "we already know the probe was not a 'hoax'"

[TSA]

yes. including the tweet that says "proves trump/russia collusion probe not a 'hoax'"

to which my comment was directed. its why i led with "we already know the probe was not a 'hoax'"

Sorry that was really confusing...I can't see the tweets when I'm using Firefox and I can't copy and paste the link if someone doesn't put the full tweet link in their post. I quoted Spurs Homer just to laugh at him. Had no idea he posted a tweet.

You asked me to define Russiagate and I did. Did you just want my definition or did you want to discuss it further? You completely ignored my response.

[spurraider21]

Sorry that was really confusing...I can't see the tweets when I'm using Firefox and I can't copy and paste the link if someone doesn't put the full tweet link in their post. I quoted Spurs Homer just to laugh at him. Had no idea he posted a tweet.
:lol you posted the tweet


You asked me to define Russiagate and I did. Did you just want my definition or did you want to discuss it further? You completely ignored my response.
i did ask you to define Russiagate. because when you say "believing in Russiagate" i wanted to know what you meant. if i thought there were valid questions about the campaign's contact with russian officials/lawyers and welcomed the investigation into it and did not think it was all a hoax created by hillary clinton or whatever, i dont know if i'd put that on the same plane of existence as believing that democrats were eating babies in the basement of a pizza parlor

i would agree that people who believed stuff like the peepee tape or that trump was basically the winter soldier actively doing the bidding of russia, that would be a lot more farfetched

[ElNono]

When did I claim Mueller based parts of his report on the dossier? You claimed Mueller never investigated the dossier. Mueller had a team investigating the dossier for months. Just take the L and move on.

By omission. When you advance that Mueller didn't follow up on Nolan, you're calling into question Mueller investigation's thoroughness and thus his report. Otherwise, you wouldn't be posting that Techn:lolf:lolg garbage.

But every single statement from the witnesses point out that Mueller didn't deem that the dossier had value to his investigation, thus not pursuing it. Not to mention that Durham epic fail validated Mueller's decision.

You can keep the L, add it to your growing collection, tbh

[BD24]

Where did OP djohn2oo8 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14870) go?
Hiding or posting under another name I imagine

[TSA]

By omission. When you advance that Mueller didn't follow up on Nolan, you're calling into question Mueller investigation's thoroughness and thus his report. Otherwise, you wouldn't be posting that Techn:lolf:lolg garbage.

But every single statement from the witnesses point out that Mueller didn't deem that the dossier had value to his investigation, thus not pursuing it. Not to mention that Durham epic fail validated Mueller's decision.

You can keep the L, add it to your growing collection, tbh

Thanks for admitting you pulled that made up claim from me out of your ass.

You claimed Mueller never investigated the dossier and were then shown Mueller had a team dedicated to investigating the dossier and they did so for months. Take the L and move on.

[Spurs Homer]

Thanks for admitting you pulled that made up claim from me out of your ass.

You claimed Mueller never investigated the dossier and were then shown Mueller had a team dedicated to investigating the dossier and they did so for months. Take the L and move on.


Read about this corruption from traitors TSA supports:


https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/26/us/politics/durham-trump-russia-barr.html

[ElNono]

Thanks for admitting you pulled that made up claim from me out of your ass.

You claimed Mueller never investigated the dossier and were then shown Mueller had a team dedicated to investigating the dossier and they did so for months. Take the L and move on.

I can quote myself on what my claim was:


That it wasn’t in their ‘purview’ doesn’t mean they didn’t look at it all, it simply means it wasn’t pursued as an integral part of the investigation, which, given Mueller’s now known report and the tacit admission here that leads like Dolan were not pursued, prove that statement correct.

Which is not the goalpost move you're trying to make now. You can tack that L to your collection :lol

[Winehole23]

Mr. Barr and Mr. Durham decided that the tip was too serious and credible to ignore. But rather than assign it to another prosecutor, Mr. Barr had Mr. Durham investigate the matter himself — giving him criminal prosecution powers for the first time — even though the possible wrongdoing by Mr. Trump did not fall squarely within Mr. Durham’s assignment to scrutinize the origins of the Russia inquiry, the people said.

Mr. Durham never filed charges, and it remains unclear what level of an investigation it was, what steps he took, what he learned and whether anyone at the White House ever found out. The extraordinary fact that Mr. Durham opened a criminal investigation that included scrutinizing Mr. Trump has remained secret.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/26/us/politics/durham-trump-russia-barr.html

[Spurs Homer]

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/26/us/politics/durham-trump-russia-barr.html

weaponization of the doj?

ya think gym jordan will look into this?

you think TSA will clutch his pearls?

[TSA]

I can quote myself on what my claim was:



Which is not the goalpost move you're trying to make now. You can tack that L to your collection :lol


I never claimed Mueller relied on the dossier for his investigation I just said it was a part of it.



There's simply no evidence of that.

Take the L and move on. :lol

[ElNono]

Take the L and move on. :lol

:lol why are you quoting that when I was referring to the Technofag tweet you posted and the followup lame attempts at defending it?

Take the L and move on. :lol

[TSA]

:lol why are you quoting that when I was referring to the Technofag tweet you posted and the followup lame attempts at defending it?

Take the L and move on. :lol

I quoted you to laugh at your goalpost move. You went from the Steele dossier was never part of Mueller's investigation to well, it wasn't in the purview, but that doesn't mean it was not investigated.

Take your L and move on.

[Ef-man]

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/26/us/politics/durham-trump-russia-barr.html

Fucked up shit.

[Spurs Homer]

Fucked up shit.

comrade TSA wants zero part in anything regarding truth about trumps treason

[Ef-man]

comrade TSA wants zero part in anything regarding truth about trumps treason

Yup.

https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1620109215141593088

[ElNono]

I quoted you to laugh at your goalpost move. You went from the Steele dossier was never part of Mueller's investigation to well, it wasn't in the purview, but that doesn't mean it was not investigated.

You quoted Cuck Ross, that's not me.


Take your L and move on.

You earned it, keep it.

[Ef-man]

You quoted Cuck Ross, that's not me.



You earned it, keep it.

Didn't you know that in Korea (where TSA works 24/7 without internet), Cuck Ross (쿠크 로스) is same-same as El Nono (엘노노)?

:lmao

In Korea, TSA ross again.

[Spurs Homer]

Yup.

https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1620109215141593088

jeez

ANOTHER treasonous confession…

Comrade TSA = too much of a pussy to touch that one lol

[TSA]

You quoted Cuck Ross, that's not me.



You earned it, keep it.

I quoted your response to Cuck Ross. This is amusing watching you deny your goalpost move :lol

You are stacking up L's at this point, time to move on.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Yup.

https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1620109215141593088

Trump recognizes the efficacy of Russian interference.

[TSA]

comrade TSA wants zero part in anything regarding truth about trumps treason

"The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

"The investigation examined whether [contacts between Russia and Trump figures] involved or resulted in coordination or a conspiracy with the Trump Campaign and Russia, including with respect to Russia providing assistance to the Campaign in exchange for any sort of favorable treatment in the future. Based on the available information, the investigation did not establish such coordination."

"The investigation did not establish that [Carter] Page coordinated with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere with the 2016 election."

"The Office did not identify evidence in those [contacts between Russians and people around Trump after the GOP convention] of coordination between the Campaign and the Russian government."

"The Office did not identify evidence of a connection between Manafort's sharing polling data and Russia's interference in the election ... [and] the investigation did not establish that Manafort otherwise coordinated with the Russian government on its election-interference efforts."

"The investigation did not establish that these [contacts between Russians and people around Trump during the transition] reflected or constituted coordination between the Trump Campaign and Russia in its election interference activities."

"The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons conspired or coordinated with the [Russian disinformation campaign]."

[Ef-man]

A federal judge criticized Attorney General William Barr on Thursday for his handling of the Mueller report when it was released last spring, saying Barr’s early description of the report didn’t match the special counsel’s actual conclusions.

Judge Reggie Walton asked if Barr’s actions were a “calculated attempt” to help President Donald Trump and opined the attorney general had a “lack of candor” with the public and Congress.

“The Court cannot reconcile certain public representations made by Attorney General Barr with the findings in the Mueller Report,” Walton wrote on Thursday. Barr’s initial publicly announced interpretation of the findings from former special counsel Robert Mueller “cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary.”

https://www.cnn.com/judge-mueller-report-barr (https://www.cnn.com/judge-mueller-report-barr)


"The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

"The investigation examined whether [contacts between Russia and Trump figures] involved or resulted in coordination or a conspiracy with the Trump Campaign and Russia, including with respect to Russia providing assistance to the Campaign in exchange for any sort of favorable treatment in the future. Based on the available information, the investigation did not establish such coordination."

"The investigation did not establish that [Carter] Page coordinated with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere with the 2016 election."

"The Office did not identify evidence in those [contacts between Russians and people around Trump after the GOP convention] of coordination between the Campaign and the Russian government."

"The Office did not identify evidence of a connection between Manafort's sharing polling data and Russia's interference in the election ... [and] the investigation did not establish that Manafort otherwise coordinated with the Russian government on its election-interference efforts."

"The investigation did not establish that these [contacts between Russians and people around Trump during the transition] reflected or constituted coordination between the Trump Campaign and Russia in its election interference activities."

"The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons conspired or coordinated with the [Russian disinformation campaign]."

[Ef-man]

https://twitter.com/dennisgriffin7/status/1620469040195211264

[TSA]

A federal judge criticized Attorney General William Barr on Thursday for his handling of the Mueller report when it was released last spring, saying Barr’s early description of the report didn’t match the special counsel’s actual conclusions.

Judge Reggie Walton asked if Barr’s actions were a “calculated attempt” to help President Donald Trump and opined the attorney general had a “lack of candor” with the public and Congress.

“The Court cannot reconcile certain public representations made by Attorney General Barr with the findings in the Mueller Report,” Walton wrote on Thursday. Barr’s initial publicly announced interpretation of the findings from former special counsel Robert Mueller “cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary.”

https://www.cnn.com/judge-mueller-report-barr (https://www.cnn.com/judge-mueller-report-barr)

These are Mueller’s words not Barr’s you dipshit.

"The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

"The investigation examined whether [contacts between Russia and Trump figures] involved or resulted in coordination or a conspiracy with the Trump Campaign and Russia, including with respect to Russia providing assistance to the Campaign in exchange for any sort of favorable treatment in the future. Based on the available information, the investigation did not establish such coordination."

"The investigation did not establish that [Carter] Page coordinated with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere with the 2016 election."

"The Office did not identify evidence in those [contacts between Russians and people around Trump after the GOP convention] of coordination between the Campaign and the Russian government."

"The Office did not identify evidence of a connection between Manafort's sharing polling data and Russia's interference in the election ... [and] the investigation did not establish that Manafort otherwise coordinated with the Russian government on its election-interference efforts."

"The investigation did not establish that these [contacts between Russians and people around Trump during the transition] reflected or constituted coordination between the Trump Campaign and Russia in its election interference activities."

"The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons conspired or coordinated with the [Russian disinformation campaign]."

https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/download

[FuzzyLumpkins]

A federal judge criticized Attorney General William Barr on Thursday for his handling of the Mueller report when it was released last spring, saying Barr’s early description of the report didn’t match the special counsel’s actual conclusions.

Judge Reggie Walton asked if Barr’s actions were a “calculated attempt” to help President Donald Trump and opined the attorney general had a “lack of candor” with the public and Congress.

“The Court cannot reconcile certain public representations made by Attorney General Barr with the findings in the Mueller Report,” Walton wrote on Thursday. Barr’s initial publicly announced interpretation of the findings from former special counsel Robert Mueller “cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary.”

https://www.cnn.com/judge-mueller-report-barr (https://www.cnn.com/judge-mueller-report-barr)

He already know this. it was rubbed in his face in real time. You haven't caught on that he doesn't even believe the shit he is spouting? He lives for your indignation.

[Spurs Homer]

These are Mueller’s words not Barr’s you dipshit.

"The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

"The investigation examined whether [contacts between Russia and Trump figures] involved or resulted in coordination or a conspiracy with the Trump Campaign and Russia, including with respect to Russia providing assistance to the Campaign in exchange for any sort of favorable treatment in the future. Based on the available information, the investigation did not establish such coordination."

"The investigation did not establish that [Carter] Page coordinated with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere with the 2016 election."

"The Office did not identify evidence in those [contacts between Russians and people around Trump after the GOP convention] of coordination between the Campaign and the Russian government."

"The Office did not identify evidence of a connection between Manafort's sharing polling data and Russia's interference in the election ... [and] the investigation did not establish that Manafort otherwise coordinated with the Russian government on its election-interference efforts."

"The investigation did not establish that these [contacts between Russians and people around Trump during the transition] reflected or constituted coordination between the Trump Campaign and Russia in its election interference activities."

"The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons conspired or coordinated with the [Russian disinformation campaign]."

https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/download


in YOUR words comrade;

1) is it ok to take putins side against usa intel?
2j is it ok to have your campaign mgr give polling data to russian intel agents in the secret meeting?
3) is it ok to organize, fund, direct, inspire and take part in a coup against the usa?
4) is it ok for a sitting president to take part in a coup and his son in law to receive two billion from a foreign govt?


thanks comrade - now run away like a bitch or cherry-pick some more talking points while ignoring the instances where trump and russia DID collude and conspire and sell out the usa in favor of russia

[ElNono]

I quoted your response to Cuck Ross. This is amusing watching you deny your goalpost move :lol

You are stacking up L's at this point, time to move on.

Again, I can quote myself on what my position was:


That it wasn’t in their ‘purview’ doesn’t mean they didn’t look at it all, it simply means it wasn’t pursued as an integral part of the investigation, which, given Mueller’s now known report and the tacit admission here that leads like Dolan were not pursued, prove that statement correct.

I don't even know what that response to Cuck Ross was (you didn't link it), and probably was well before the Danchenko trial. So, if we didn't know then, we sure know now that Mueller didn't pursue the dossier.

:lol Keep your stack of L's.

[TSA]

Again, I can quote myself on what my position was:



I don't even know what that response to Cuck Ross was (you didn't link it), and probably was well before the Danchenko trial. So, if we didn't know then, we sure know now that Mueller didn't pursue the dossier.

:lol Keep your stack of L's.

You are quoting your goalpost move :lol

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=287389&page=9&highlight=Durham

Add another L to the stack.

[ElNono]

You are quoting your goalpost move :lol

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=287389&page=9&highlight=Durham

Add another L to the stack.

:lol there was no goalpost move. This conversation spawned from your technofag post on the Danchenko interview.

I answered to Cuck that there was no evidence at the time, which was correct at that time (previous to the case). Once the Danchenko case shed light on the fact that Mueller didn't pursue the dossier, there was evidence.

If you're going to keep racking up L's, at least keep track of what you're quoting. :lol

[pgardn]

:lol there was no goalpost move. This conversation spawned from your technofag post on the Danchenko interview.

I answered to Cuck that there was no evidence at the time, which was correct at that time (previous to the case). Once the Danchenko case shed light on the fact that Mueller didn't pursue the dossier, there was evidence.

If you're going to keep racking up L's, at least keep track of what you're quoting. :lol

This is one of my biggest gripes with the red team members on this site; chronological order HAS meaning.

Especially with their Covid bullshit.

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao the dumbasses who thought this guy was a rational human being

1623781272022548480

[RandomGuy]

‘Trump Was Right’: Explosive New FBI Texts Detail Internal Furor Over Handling Of ‘Crossfire Hurricane’ Investigation

"Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents tasked by fired former Director James Comey to take down Donald Trump during and after the 2016 election were so concerned about the agency’s potentially illegal behavior that they purchased liability insurance to protect themselves less than two weeks before Trump was inaugurated president, previously hidden FBI text messages show. The explosive new communications and internal FBI notes were disclosed in federal court filings today from Sidney Powell, the attorney who heads Michael Flynn’s legal defense team.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Frqi5n7WYAE-tXx?format=jpg&name=small

:rollin

[Spurs Homer]

:lmao:lmao:rollin:lmao ^

[djohn2oo8]

This thread will go down in Spurstalk history as the political forums GOAT when the only person indicted is Susan Rice
Oh yeah?

[djohn2oo8]

List the 2 process crimes and the 2 that have absolutely nothing to do with Trump not his campaign. Let’s have some fun.
Seems like Trump has done some crimes now

[Ef-man]

Seems like Trump has done some crimes now

Back to S. Korea to work 24/7 with no internets for qtsa, the ST board idiot. :lol

[TSA]

Seems like Trump has done some crimes now

Are you really this stupid to bump the thread that sent you into hiding? Yes, you are that stupid. :lol

When Mueller didn’t put Trump in prison why did you abandon this thread and go into hiding for months?

[djohn2oo8]

Are you really this stupid to bump the thread that sent you into hiding? Yes, you are that stupid. :lol

When Mueller didn’t put Trump in prison why did you abandon this thread and go into hiding for months?
Still can’t find the Susan Rice indictment

[TSA]

Still can’t find the Susan Rice indictment

Still can’t answer why you abandoned this thread and went into hiding for months. :lmao

Should have at least bumped this thread with one of your alts tbh. Coming back in here under your main account lol…everyone saw what a bitch you were when you bailed and no one has forgotten.

[djohn2oo8]

Still can’t answer why you abandoned this thread and went into hiding for months. :lmao

Should have at least bumped this thread with one of your alts tbh. Coming back in here under your main account lol…everyone saw what a bitch you were when you bailed and no one has forgotten.
Trump is about to go hide in a prison. Get my money ready, bitch.

[TSA]

Trump is about to go hide in a prison. Get my money ready, bitch.

Get money ready for what?

[djohn2oo8]

The original bet was Trump will be nailed for obstruction.


$500 per person on going to prison

Trump
Trump Jr
Kushner
Ivanca
Here are the goddamn terms

[djohn2oo8]

So you will pay the fuck up

[Ef-man]

So you will pay the fuck up

He is going to welsh, book it.

[djohn2oo8]

He is going to welsh, book it.
Absolutely

[Spurs Homer]

Pay the man- comrade TSA

you fucking fuck

[TSA]

Here are the goddamn terms

Mueller put none of them in prison. You lost $2000 and welshed and went into hiding for months. These are the facts.

[djohn2oo8]

Mueller put none of them in prison. You lost $2000 and welshed and went into hiding for months. These are the facts.
You didn’t bet that. You said no one was going to jail period. Welshing ass bitch.

[Spurs Homer]

You didn’t bet that. You said no one was going to jail period. Welshing ass bitch.


maybe he is a broke ass bitch?

a brainwashed, lying, treasonous, welching, broke-ass bitch



:rollin:rollin:lmao

[TSA]

You didn’t bet that. You said no one was going to jail period. Welshing ass bitch.
Our bet was dependent on Mueller.

If that wasn't the bet...why did you abandon this thread and go into hiding when Mueller closed his investigation and didn't put Trump or family in prison?

[TSA]

Poor fella isn't going to be able to answer that question :lol

[djohn2oo8]

Our bet was dependent on Mueller.

If that wasn't the bet...why did you abandon this thread and go into hiding when Mueller closed his investigation and didn't put Trump or family in prison?
You actually said Trump would never be indicted or go to jail period but I digress

https://media.tenor.com/BzdybKbJj7gAAAAd/moving-goalpost.gif

[pgardn]

Mueller does not put Trump in prison, a jury and judge do.