Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[ChumpDumper]

https://mediaproxy.salon.com/width/380/https://media2.salon.com/2020/07/general-flynn-4th-of-july-pledge-screengrab-0706201.jpg

king sp:lol:lolk

[Winehole23]

ALL CAPS SHOUTING


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:szb2trl37bymn5rstoa3v5wl/bafkreigzijf2qgfxqqvahds4xgvwki2ab2c7ubrak474o6nwn n7ltpz4ni@jpeg

[Thread]

ALL CAPS SHOUTING


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:szb2trl37bymn5rstoa3v5wl/bafkreigzijf2qgfxqqvahds4xgvwki2ab2c7ubrak474o6nwn n7ltpz4ni@jpeg

Blasting hair all over them walls.

[ChumpDumper]

ALL CAPS SHOUTING


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:szb2trl37bymn5rstoa3v5wl/bafkreigzijf2qgfxqqvahds4xgvwki2ab2c7ubrak474o6nwn n7ltpz4ni@jpeg

Completely hinged. Why isn't he DNI?

[Spurs Homer]

When criminals are in power...there is no law...

not sure why criminals threaten honorable law abiders with "lawful prosecutions"

laughable...

[Thread]

When criminals are in power...there is no law...

not sure why criminals threaten honorable law abiders with "lawful prosecutions"

laughable...

Let us proceed...

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:wbsyxxtht2fli5uvix6l55d4/bafkreifneldyvh4v3frqyqpbptitijlhw5b22lwdw6fp37f5u ksfznf5ni@jpeg

[Thread]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:wbsyxxtht2fli5uvix6l55d4/bafkreifneldyvh4v3frqyqpbptitijlhw5b22lwdw6fp37f5u ksfznf5ni@jpeg

You never forget. & you never leave anybody behind.

Let us proceed...

[TSA]

https://x.com/LibertyLockPod/status/1902465203180109848
djohn2oo8 :lmao :lmao :lmao

[Winehole23]

are you ok, TSA?

[TSA]

are you ok, TSA?

Of course. Why do you ask?

[ChumpDumper]

:lol still simping for King Spook

[SnakeBoy]

Of course. Why do you ask?

He's been projecting for a while now

[Winehole23]

about the only thing you ever offer an opinion about on this board is me

have you considered getting other hobbies?

[Thread]

about the only thing you ever offer an opinion about on this board is me

have you considered getting other hobbies?

He left Effy where he found him...dead in the ground.

[TSA]

are you ok, TSA?

Of course. Why do you ask?

[ChumpDumper]

The actual list of issues on which TSA will comment gets smaller with every Trump/President Elon fuckup.

[koriwhat]

When criminals are in power...there is no law...

not sure why criminals threaten honorable law abiders with "lawful prosecutions"

laughable...

You're on some strong meds aren't you? Fucking mentally ill retard!

[koriwhat]

https://x.com/LibertyLockPod/status/1902465203180109848
djohn2oo8 :lmao :lmao :lmao

Steele needs time in that El Salvador prison and that's not harsh enough.

[Winehole23]

deporting people for doing political oppo research

[Winehole23]

such thin skins, all these years later

[TSA]

are you ok, TSA?

Of course. Why do you ask?

[Winehole23]

your outbursts are often not very coherent, as above

[TSA]

your outbursts are often not very coherent, as above

A video of Christopher Steele getting taken to the woodshed in the Russiagate thread is not very coherent? Are you day drinking again?

[Thread]

A video of Christopher Steele getting taken to the woodshed in the Russiagate thread is not very coherent? Are you day drinking again?

muhahahahahhahahaha!!!

[Winehole23]

Christopher Steele is a UK citizen. Good luck deporting him to a gulag.

[TSA]

FBI launches criminal investigations of John Brennan, James Comey: DOJ sources

"Former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey are under criminal investigation for potential wrongdoing related to the Trump–Russia probe, including allegedly making false statements to Congress, Justice Department sources told Fox News Digital."

"Last week's review marks the first time career CIA officials have acknowledged politicization of the process by which the ICA was written, particularly by Obama-era political appointees. Records declassified as part of that review further revealed that Brennan did, in fact, push for the dossier to be included in the 2017 ICA. Brennan testified to the House Judiciary Committee in May 2023, however, that he did not believe the dossier should be included in that intelligence product."

"The false statements portion of the probe stems from a newly declassified email sent to Brennan by the former deputy CIA director in December 2016. That message said that including the dossier in the ICA in any capacity jeopardized "the credibility of the entire paper. "Despite these objections, Brennan showed a preference for narrative consistency over analytical soundness," the new CIA review states. "When confronted with specific flaws in the Dossier by the two mission center leaders – one with extensive operational experience and the other with a strong analytic background – he appeared more swayed by the Dossier's general conformity with existing theories than by legitimate tradecraft concerns."

The review added: "Brennan ultimately formalized his position in writing, stating that ‘my bottomline is that I believe that the information warrants inclusion in the report.’"

But Brennan testified the opposite in front of Congress in May 2023.

"The CIA was very much opposed to having any reference or inclusion of the Steele dossier in the Intelligence Community Assessment," Brennan testified before the House committee, according to the transcript of his deposition reviewed by Fox News Digital. "And so they sent over a copy of the dossier to say that this was going to be separate from the rest of that assessment."


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/john-brennan-james-comey-under-criminal-investigation-doj-sources
djohn2oo8 :lol

[Spurs Homer]

There is zero chance trump really wants any kind of "discovery" to prosecute these guys...

ZERO.

Another one of these "be careful what you wish for" trump acts...

please try to prove trumps treason was some kind of hoax instead of what it actually is


trumps treason.


hahahahahahahahahaha!

TSA already setting himself up to be embarrassed again...

[ChumpDumper]

I look forward to an open and transparent discovery process.

[Spurs Homer]

I look forward to an open and transparent discovery process.

We will get all of trumps proof - and a full discovery hearing - the same day we get the unredacted epstein files, the unredacted mueller report and these new "outrageous" crimes by comey and brennan....

[TSA]

Obama admin 'manufactured' intelligence to create 2016 Russian election interference narrative, documents show

"The Obama administration "manufactured and politicized intelligence" to create the narrative that Russia was attempting to influence the 2016 presidential election, despite information from the intelligence community stating otherwise, Fox News Digital has learned.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard Friday declassified documents revealing "overwhelming evidence" that demonstrates how, after President Donald Trump won the 2016 election against Hillary Clinton, then-President Barack Obama and his national security team laid the groundwork for what would be the yearslong Trump–Russia collusion probe.

""The information we are releasing today clearly shows there was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government," Gabbard told Fox News Digital. "Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people."

Gabbard said the "egregious abuse of power and blatant rejection of our Constitution" by Obama-era officials "threatens the very foundation and integrity of our democratic republic."

"No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, to ensure nothing like this ever happens again," Gabbard said. "The American people’s faith and trust in our democratic republic and therefore the future of our nation depends on it."

Gabbard added: "As such, I am providing all documents to the Department of Justice to deliver the accountability that President Trump, his family, and the American people deserve."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/obama-admin-manufactured-intelligence-create-2016-russian-election-interference-narrative-documents-show
djohn2oo8 :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

TSA :lmao

[Spurs Homer]

TSA :lmao


Im betting my net worth that TSA already swallowed these lies - and the proof will always be just a little out of reach but he will peddle this shit!

hahahahahahahahaha!

Trump: "hey tulsi....here is your next assignment!"

[koriwhat]

Im betting my net worth that TSA already swallowed these lies - and the proof will always be just a little out of reach but he will peddle this shit!

hahahahahahahahaha!

Trump: "hey tulsi....here is your next assignment!"

A bet for $0 isn't a bet at all.

[Ball Buster]

TSA :lmao

Russia-gate hucksters :lol

[TSA]

Obama admin 'manufactured' intelligence to create 2016 Russian election interference narrative, documents show

"The Obama administration "manufactured and politicized intelligence" to create the narrative that Russia was attempting to influence the 2016 presidential election, despite information from the intelligence community stating otherwise, Fox News Digital has learned.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard Friday declassified documents revealing "overwhelming evidence" that demonstrates how, after President Donald Trump won the 2016 election against Hillary Clinton, then-President Barack Obama and his national security team laid the groundwork for what would be the yearslong Trump–Russia collusion probe.

""The information we are releasing today clearly shows there was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government," Gabbard told Fox News Digital. "Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people."

Gabbard said the "egregious abuse of power and blatant rejection of our Constitution" by Obama-era officials "threatens the very foundation and integrity of our democratic republic."

"No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, to ensure nothing like this ever happens again," Gabbard said. "The American people’s faith and trust in our democratic republic and therefore the future of our nation depends on it."

Gabbard added: "As such, I am providing all documents to the Department of Justice to deliver the accountability that President Trump, his family, and the American people deserve."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/obama-admin-manufactured-intelligence-create-2016-russian-election-interference-narrative-documents-show
djohn2oo8 :lmao

https://x.com/DNIGabbard/status/1946271406888554848

https://x.com/DNIGabbard/status/1946271414132133999

https://x.com/DNIGabbard/status/1946271421400805844

https://media1.tenor.com/m/vvX7YQxvGj4AAAAd/oof-meme.gif

[ChumpDumper]

nothingburger

So where are the Epstein files?

[ChumpDumper]

:lol the narrative building is off the charts here

[ChumpDumper]

Seriously TSA, could you believe that maybe the release of this new narrative might be meant to distract from -- I don't know -- Trump's love letter to Epstein?

[Spurs Homer]

Hahahahahahahaha!

look - over there- a squirrel!


hahahahahaha!

this is good!

trump was playing 34-D chess when he said, “russia , if you are listening…”

and helsinki was trump using his academy award acting chops to fool the world that he had just taken putins side against the usa…
because he knew that years later…

cult hypnotized tulsi- now on her third cult trance - would uncover the reeeeel deep state and those acts of treason like
jan 6th….

was just trump-again- donning his patriot suit and staging a false flag attack on the capitol to make sure those dems were thrwon off the trail and fall right into the trap…


TSA

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

[Spurs Homer]

Release the UNREDACTED EPSTEIN PEDO-FILES!

[Winehole23]

"Russia-Russia-Russia-gate"

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/18/tulsi-gabbard-obama-2016-election-russia

[Ball Buster]

"Russia-Russia-Russia-gate"

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/18/tulsi-gabbard-obama-2016-election-russia

Neo-lib propaganda piece attempting to discredit Gabbard’s “allegations”.

Article ends with…


The Steele dossier, which contained salacious details of “kompromat” allegedly held by Russian intelligence on Trump, formed part of the basis for a lengthy investigation conducted by Robert Mueller, who was appointed as special counsel into the Russia affair. Mueller’s subsequent report concluded that Russia interfered “in sweeping and systematic fashion” in the election campaign but “did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated” with the Russian government’s activities.

they print this weak attempt narrative control knowing full well their rube audience is too dumb to know the Hillary Clinton campaign 2016 was the source of the Steele dossier :lol

[Winehole23]

Neo-lib propaganda piece attempting to discredit Gabbard’s “allegations”.

Article ends with…



they print this weak attempt narrative control knowing full well their rube audience is too dumb to know the Hillary Clinton campaign 2016 was the source of the Steele dossier :lolWhat do you think of Gabbard's allegations?

Assumed as proven, I take it?

[Ball Buster]

nothingburger

So where are the Epstein files?

exactly, we know the Democrats and their donors want the files released.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GwN7qUmWcAApJhb?format=jpg&name=large

[Winehole23]

I'd be totally down with that

let the chips fall

[Ball Buster]

What do you think of Gabbard's allegations?

Assumed as proven, I take it?

How does one post Twitter links these days?

[Winehole23]

How does one post Twitter links these days?"go advanced" use the logo

[Ball Buster]

What do you think of Gabbard's allegations?

Assumed as proven, I take it?


she uncovered evidence that the FBI and the CIA were publicly claiming widespread Russian tampering and hacking by the Russians. While privately among themselves were expressing doubts about the Russians intent and ability to rig an U.S. election.



https://x.com/aaronjmate/status/1946364596568134132?s=61&t=CQfvV293J518QWnxG7pQDg

[Ball Buster]

https://x.com/aaronjmate/status/1946364596568134132?s=61&t=CQfvV293J518QWnxG7pQDg

[Ball Buster]

https://x.com/aaronjmate/status/1946364596568134132?s=61&t=CQfvV293J518QWnxG7pQDg

[Winehole23]

she uncovered evidence that the FBI and the CIA were publicly claiming widespread Russian tampering and hacking by the Russians. While privately among themselves were expressing doubts about the Russians intent and ability to rig an U.S. election.



https://x.com/aaronjmate/status/1946364596568134132?s=61&t=CQfvV293J518QWnxG7pQDgI don't see the two as being mutually exclusive, do you?

surely it's overkill to suggest there were zero Russian attempts to influence Trump or the reverse

[Ball Buster]

I don't see the two as being mutually exclusive, do you?

surely it's overkill to suggest there were zero Russian attempts to influence Trump or the reverse

interesting.

can you think of any other countries that influence our elections?

[Winehole23]

short of overt corruption and election tampering, there's room for considerable mischief

I think it's ok for people to make up their own minds about the trustworthiness of their representatives well short of legally provable crimes and for the media to report on it, don't you?

[Winehole23]

interesting.

can you think of any other countries that influence our elections?probably all of them in some way or another

do you have a point, or were you just clearing your throat?

[Winehole23]

suggesting that the other side's propaganda is treason and that reporting on it is treason is just sore loser right wingers complaining that free speech didn't always go their way

in an election Trump won

[Ball Buster]

probably all of them in some way or another

do you have a point, or were you just clearing your throat?

You are concerned about Russian interference. Even though it’s a conspiracy theory that’s been debunked.

Yet, you are unbothered by this shit…

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gv7b78NXwAA8hKO?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gv7b78QWgAEAmKv?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gv7b78KWEAEx5Yp?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gv7b78MWQAAQyB3?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gv7b8d9WUAEXOhl?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gv7b8eDXAAAKD3H?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gv7b8d9XIAAJ1ZV?format=jpg&name=large



,



https://x.com/maxblumenthal/status/1945233916480172475?s=61&t=CQfvV293J518QWnxG7pQDghttps://x.com/maxblumenthal/status/1945233916480172475?s=61&t=CQfvV293J518QWnxG7pQDg

[Winehole23]

Yes, Israel is very influential in the USA

Not sure why you assume my opinion about that, it's free to ask and my forum posts are searchable

[Winehole23]

And I guess you weren't paying attention to my pattern of posting here

I never was a Russia collusion guy, I never found that convincing, but that doesn’t mean there was nothing at all there

[Winehole23]

Even less convincing to me is the conspiracy theory that the plot against Trump was kept under wraps, just in case he won.

[Ball Buster]

Trump wouldn't be covering his ass so carefully if he didn't have something -- in all likelihood, a lot of things -- to hide.

I seem to remember you making quite a few posts like this. Not a full blown Russia-gater, but somewhere in the “where there’s smoke there’s fire “ camp.

[Winehole23]

I seem to remember you making quite a few posts like this. Not a full blown Russia-gater, but somewhere in the “where there’s smoke there’s fire “ camp.I think the Mueller Report bore that out.

Of course this is very all quaint now with China and various foreign billionaires openly stuffing Trump's pockets with crypto cash.

[ChumpDumper]

she uncovered evidence that the FBI and the CIA were publicly claiming widespread Russian tampering and hacking by the Russians. While privately among themselves were expressing doubts about the Russians intent and ability to rig an U.S. election.



https://x.com/aaronjmate/status/1946364596568134132?s=61&t=CQfvV293J518QWnxG7pQDg
The initial evaluations were about tampering directly with election infrastructure.

The following evaluations were about hacking servers and accounts of Democrats.

Even the most cursory reading of the tweetstorm shows these are two different things.

Are you smart enough to know these are two different things?

[Spurs Homer]

those russians got hillary installed as president...oh shit no -wait!

hahahahahahahahahaha!

what kind of a scandal is this anyway?


oh yeah - epstein panic....

[ChumpDumper]

those russians got hillary installed as president...oh shit no -wait!

hahahahahahahahahaha!

what kind of a scandal is this anyway?


oh yeah - epstein panic....

:lol if this is the best they can do to distract from the Epstein fiasco -- Epstein is going to be top of mind for the foreseeable future.

Just release the files. What are you afraid of, Trumptards?

[Spurs Homer]

:lol if this is the best they can do to distract from the Epstein fiasco -- Epstein is going to be top of mind for the foreseeable future.

Just release the files. What are you afraid of, Trumptards?

its a waste of time -

im calling it now -

leaks will happen and confirm 1000 percent trump pedophilia and....

the cult and the right wing propagandists will create another alternate reality where trump is actually a savior who fooled the libs into thinking pedophilia is actually a crime...

and his assaults were just messianic acts of sacrifice to save the usa and .....MAGA!

[ChumpDumper]

I just can't believe how poorly thought-out this whole gambit was.

Voting machines <> DNC servers is the biggest and easiest fuckup to spot.

The fun part is that the current FBI director and Joltin' John Durham had already reviewed all of this material for years and didn't come to these idiotic conclusions.

Probably because they're lawyers who know that's not how anything works.

Rubes like TSAnon fell for it though. As always.

[Winehole23]

I think the Mueller Report bore that out.

Of course this is very all quaint now with China and various foreign billionaires openly stuffing Trump's pockets with crypto cash.oddly, no one has replied to this

isn't it obvious?

[Ball Buster]

The initial evaluations were about tampering directly with election infrastructure.

The following evaluations were about hacking servers and accounts of Democrats.

Even the most cursory reading of the tweetstorm shows these are two different things.

Are you smart enough to know these are two different things?


All of the evaluations were proven false. The FBI lied about Russia gate, the CIA lied about Russia gate, the news media continues to lie about Russia gate, and you still are dumb enough to believe Russia gate was real. Take your debate class hair-splitting, and shove it up your ass :lol.

[Ball Buster]

oddly, no one has replied to this

isn't it obvious?

the Mueller investigation didn’t “prove “anything. Instead it was a political gift to Donald Trump after the no collusion finding

[ChumpDumper]

All of the evaluations were proven false.Nope.

Mueller Report.

You have no idea what you're talking about.

[ChumpDumper]

Mueller sure didn't say Seth Rich did it.:lol

[Winehole23]

the Mueller investigation didn’t “prove “anything. Instead it was a political gift to Donald Trump after the no collusion findingI didn't claim they proved anything but you missed the point -- current crypto corruption, mass impoundment and blatant top down censorship of the public sphere.

[Winehole23]

the Mueller investigation didn’t “prove “anything. Instead it was a political gift to Donald Trump after the no collusion findingthat's a superficial take, tbh

the lack of legally provable crimes is not an exoneration. DJT is shady as fuck, always has been.

a person like Donald Trump is supposed to get weeded out in our system of government -- he's not fit for public service

[TSA]

https://x.com/FoxNews/status/1947329259657191842


https://x.com/walkafyre/status/1947323441272520985


https://x.com/FOOL_NELSON/status/1947329546211999864


https://x.com/JsnFostr/status/1947327018485604476

[ChumpDumper]

https://x.com/FoxNews/status/1947329259657191842


https://x.com/walkafyre/status/1947323441272520985


[tweet]https://x.com/FOOL_NELSON/status/1947329546211999864[/tweet[

you got duped again, rube.:lol

[Spurs Homer]

todays date- 7/21/25

ill say OBAMA never gets lawfully prosecuted on anything...and the date is set....

in a year TSA- can look at the date and ask himself why its been a year and this "new bombshell" is forgotten....

any other dumbshit that takes this seriously also - is as stupid as gullible cultist TSA...

Tulsi knew this was one of her mandates....to create an alternate reality to

1) fool the dumbshits - again

and

2) soothe trumps guilt over his treason that the entire planet witnessed in real time

[spurraider21]

are they going to revive benghazigate again too?

[Winehole23]

are they going to revive benghazigate again too?why not, Trump is basically calling for Obama's arrest

[Winehole23]

hell, maybe they'll release the Vince Foster files too

[Winehole23]

or try to sock Obama for improper command influence on the Skip Gates case

[Winehole23]

Hannity 2019: I have zero doubt that Russia meddled in the 2016 election…I’m certain they did. Devin Nunes was warning Obama in 2014

Hannity 2025: They all lied. I’m proud that this show got it right. The rest of the media went along with the lie.

[TSA]

https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/DIG/DIG-Declassified-HPSCI-Report-Manufactured-Russia-Hoax-July2025.pdf

https://x.com/C__Herridge/status/1948028961729966404

https://x.com/bravenstunning/status/1948029987694502134

https://x.com/themarketswork/status/1948019538970472914

[TSA]

https://x.com/themarketswork/status/1948039987573989616

[ChumpDumper]

Russia did and does favor the Trump administration because Trump is a weak little bitch when it comes to dealing with Putin.

There will be zero criminal convictions from this.

It's another nothingburger you're getting excited about because Trump skullfucked you and your Epstein dreams.

[TSA]

https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/1948083651771502765

https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/161110103101-donald-trump-obama-2011-correspondents-dinner.jpg

[ChumpDumper]

The DOJ won't press charges of any kind.

You will always be a rube who never gave a shit about real child sex abuse victims.

[TSA]

https://x.com/WarlordDilley/status/1948087143848464827

https://media1.tenor.com/m/vvX7YQxvGj4AAAAd/oof-meme.gif

[ChumpDumper]

Rube.

[TSA]

In Brutal Document Release, the Russia Hoax is Finally Exposed

Official claim that Putin "aspired" to help Trump was based on four pieces of evidence, all bogus, even "ridiculous," according to long-suppressed report just released by DNI Tulsi Gabbard

It was worse than we thought.

The January 6, 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment concluding that Russian President Vladimir Putin “developed a clear preference” for Donald Trump and “aspired to help his chances of victory” is revealed in a report released this morning by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard to have been based on four pieces of evidence. One was the Steele Dossier. The surprise is that the other three were even less credible, each included over objections of the report’s CIA authors.

The first item was a “scant, unclear, and unverifiable fragment” of one sentence that the report’s five CIA authors read “five ways” and initially left out, only to have Director John Brennan order it back in. The second item was an email with “no date, no identified sender, no clear recipient, and no classification.” The third was supposedly backed by “liaison,” diplomatic, and press reporting, as well as signals intelligence (SIGINT), except the “SIGINT” didn’t mention Trump, the “liaison reporting” didn’t mention Trump and was from 2014, and the “diplomatic and media” reporting was a post-election review by a U.S. Ambassador citing a Russian pundit who said Putin and Trump should “work together like businessmen.” This was “evidence” that Putin “developed a clear preference” for Trump.

All three reports weren’t just unsourced and unreliable, but discarded fictions pulled out of the CIA’s trash heap. “They manipulated the manipulations,” is how ODNI Deputy Chief of Staff Alexa Henning put it.

The Assessment was written by just five CIA analysts hand-picked by Brennan, but even these most favored lieutenants couldn’t accept the key pieces of evidence. Two of the five went to Brennan to say, “We don’t have direct information that Putin wanted to get Trump elected,” only to be overruled. The same thing happened when members of the group objected to the Steele material, saying it didn’t meet even “basic tradecraft standards.” When confronted on this point, Brennan reportedly said, “Yes, but doesn’t it ring true?”

Similarly, when FBI agents tasked with preparing source material were asked about use of the Steele reports, one replied, “Our instructions were that anything we had was to be used,” and that “We were to push this.” The analyst added, about the Steele material, that FBI leadership had decided it was “the right thing to do,” but “we were not able to verify it.” Use of the dossier was debated but ultimately insisted upon by Brennan and FBI Director James Comey, who wrote, “I thought it very important that it be included.”

The information comes from a secret review conducted by a team of House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) investigators who worked “mostly at CIA Headquarters” and “spent over 2,300 hours reviewing the ICA and its source reports,” confirming what Racket and Public reported last year. A long list of other reporters, from Lee Smith to Aaron Maté to Paul Sperry to Ray McGovern to Margot Cleveland of The Federalist to Glenn Greenwald and the Internet sleuthing group “The Corner,” previously reported on the existence of this HPSCI report, which has been “locked in a vault” and “held hostage” at Langley since 2018, as current HPSCI chair Rick Crawford put it. Only after Donald Trump interceded in early July was this report returned to the Hill, and Gabbard’s ODNI has been working to declassify it ever since.

“The most egregious weaponization and politicization of intelligence in American history,” is how Gabbard described it today.

“Amazing,” is how former Judiciary Committee Chief Counsel Jason Foster describes the report. “It takes apart the ICA piece by piece.”

A staffer from the House intelligence Committee under Devin Nunes, who assigned the report in question, commented: “You don’t have to read much past the first page before it becomes crystal clear why the IC spent years trying to bury this report.”

https://www.racket.news/p/in-brutal-document-release-the-russia

[TSA]

https://x.com/walkafyre/status/1948081366802808914

https://x.com/walkafyre/status/1948082019126161502

[TSA]

https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/1948086361577136159

[ChumpDumper]

TSA has ODS.

You're never going to get Black President.

[Winehole23]

Periodic reminder that the Senate Intel Committee, led at the time by a certain future secretary of state Marco Rubio, concluded this in its comprehensive review of Russian interference in the 2016 election:

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:euynv325eix7glyek377orak/bafkreiclbtqvq356o6azt63lwuvv7pebfkmmcbatiomkfiaf2 [email protected]/wp-content/u... (https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/sites-default-files-documents-report-volume5.pdf)

[TSA]

https://x.com/TheJusticeDept/status/1948139213628592566

https://x.com/nicksortor/status/1948198774779568451

[TSA]

www.intelligence.senate.gov/wp-content/u... (https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/sites-default-files-documents-report-volume5.pdf)

https://x.com/VetWarrior76/status/1948244681504260505

Periodic reminder that Winehole23 a TDS is a cultist, he is immune to facts and reason.

Motivated paranoid belief is everything.

[TSA]

TSA Get in here NOW motherfucker!!!!!!

djohn2oo8

:lmao
:lmao
:lmao

[TSA]

How Obama Admin Turned ‘Unverifiable’ Report Into Russiagate Dynamite

The Obama intelligence community’s claim that Russian President Vladimir Putin authorized dirty tricks to try and help Donald Trump win the 2016 election was based on "one scant, unclear and unverifiable fragment of a sentence from one of the substandard [intelligence] reports," according to a just-declassified report that had been locked away in a CIA vault.

Nevertheless, former CIA Director John Brennan ordered agency analysts to use the claim in the Intelligence Community Assessment issued during the Obama administration’s final days – even though the ICA itself noted that how the information on Putin's plans was obtained was “not explicitly clear.”

A 46-page report by the House of Representatives released Wednesday found that the source of the claim about Putin – reportedly a Russian defector living in Northern Virginia described as “anti-Trump” – merely speculated to Brennan about something he had been told by somebody else: namely, that Putin was "counting on" Trump winning.

ICA participants interpreted the informant's phrase "counting on" several different ways, the report said. Many NSA and CIA officials viewed "counting on" as meaning the same thing as "expected," which is much different than the language – Putin "preferred" Trump – Brennan's five handpicked drafters used in the ICA.

The congressional review determined that "the ICA did not cite any [classified] report where Putin directly indicated helping Trump win was the objective." (Emphasis added.)

No Corroborating Intelligence

The report then drops a bombshell: "The ICA judgment on Putin's thoughts about helping candidate Trump does not stand if single interpretation of the fragment [from the tip that Putin was 'counting on' Trump winning] is wrong, because there is no other intelligence corroborating it."

The 2019 report, which investigated the spycraft that went into the highly classified and restricted version of the ICA, found that the Obama intelligence community’s assessment of Russia’s intentions changed sharply after Trump’s surprising victory.

On the eve of the 2016 election, Brennan sent a "Fusion Cell" memo to Obama summarizing all the most secret, compartmented intel gathered on Trump and Russia. According to the House report declassified and released by DNI Tulsi Gabbard on Wednesday, that memo " made no mention of Putin 'aspiring' for a Trump victory." Although the Russian defector had shared his thoughts about Putin with Brennan in July, the CIA director’s Nov. 6 memo concluded, "Putin expected [Clinton] to win."

But then in early December, after Obama ordered a new assessment, Brennan dusted off the informant's second-hand hearsay, which had been shelved as unreliable. The CIA director, who had previously worked for Obama in the White House, suddenly insisted it underpin the new conclusion about Putin's motives.

"The major 'high confidence' judgment of the ICA rests on one opinion about a text fragment with uncertain meaning," the House report found. "This text – which would not have been published without [Brennan's] orders to do so – is cited using only one interpretation of its meaning and without considering alternative interpretations," in violation of Intelligence Community Directive 203. One alternative was that Putin was "counting on" Trump winning the primary and nomination at the GOP Convention that July, just two weeks after the informant provided the tip, not the general election in November 2106.

[b]Rebuking Brennan

The House Intelligence Committee report, whose chief author was retired Army Col. Derek Harvey, determined from a series of interviews in 2018 and 2019 with CIA analysts at Langley that Brennan ordered drafters to use the specious report from the Russian informer without following analytical standards approved by President Obama's intelligence czar James Clapper in 2015.
The House report singled out Brennan for rebuke, questioning his "character" and "ethics," while suggesting he misled not only the public but also policymakers, lawmakers, and even many of his fellow intelligence officers. Gabbard said Wednesday she has turned the declassified report over to the Justice Department along with a criminal referral on Brennan. The FBI and DOJ have launched an investigation into Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey for possible perjury. They are also subjects of a broader conspiracy probe.

Brennan, who could not be reached for comment, has strongly defended his work. Requests for comment from Comey and his attorney went unanswered.

Harvey and other investigators spent hundreds of hours inside a highly secure room called a SCIF at CIA headquarters poring over the raw intelligence materials that supposedly backstopped the ICA's conclusions. In an exclusive interview with RealClearInvestigations, he said it became clear, after closer inspection, that the raw information the informant provided lacked credibility. “There really was no evidence that Putin supported Trump,” Harvey said.

Even so, Brennan as well as Comey, who also handled the informant, pushed to include his tip in the ICA to back the judgment Putin worked to help Trump win the election, all the while concealing their star source's identity, background and reliability from most of the participants involved in the crafting of the ICA.

"They knew he was not reliable and they tried to hide access to him," Harvey said. "They knew he had bad sources. This stuff was weak."

It was so weak that Brennan insisted analysts reference a since-debunked dossier funded by Clinton's campaign as a bullet point in the main body of the ICA to support the Putin-helped-Trump conclusion. This judgment was the most radioactive finding in the ICA and laid the foundation for several investigations of Trump and several of his advisers for allegedly "colluding" with Russia. A special counsel found no evidence that any of them conspired with Russia.

In the main body of the highly classified ICA, the bullet point supporting the key Putin-Trump judgment referred to a detailed summary of the dossier, without mentioning it was underwritten by the Clinton campaign: "For additional reporting on Russian plans and intentions, please see Annex A: Additional Reporting from an FBI Source on Russian Influence Efforts."

The "FBI source" was the retired British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, whose employer, Fusion GPS, was on the Clinton payroll. And the "additional reporting" was nothing more than Steele’s dossier, which alleged a raft of easily dispelled rumors about Trump conspiring with the Kremlin to steal the election from Clinton.

Suppressing Dissent

The House report quoted an unnamed senior intelligence officer who said he and two senior CIA officers argued with Brennan that the dossier should not be included in the ICA "at all." Brennan reportedly refused to remove it, and when confronted with the dossier's many flaws, Brennan responded: “Yes, but doesn't it ring true?"

The report discovered that Brennan "personally directed" that the CIA informant's tip underlying the key ICA conclusion that Putin helped Trump not be circulated in formal Intelligence Community channels. And Brennan only briefed the ICA team orally about it, raising suspicions he "tailored his message to different officials" to convince dissenters the tip was sound.

What's more, the House review found that Brennan made sure only a handful of analysts, mainly his handpicked authors of the ICA, were allowed to see the raw source reports out of the more than 250 people who participated in the ICA project.

On Dec. 20, 2016, during the review process, career CIA officers removed the defector’s tip from the first draft of the ICA – only to have Brennan "countermand" their decision and reinsert it in the final draft of the report.

"We don't have direct information that Putin wanted to get Trump elected," a senior CIA operations officer said he told Brennan, along with another senior colleague, according to closed-door testimony he gave House investigators. He argued that "political judgment" should have been "eliminated" from the ICA.

Right after Obama ordered the ICA on Russia in early December 2016, Brennan ordered the CIA to publish new human source intelligence reports, including the Russian informant's, which contained "flawed information," yet they were used as foundation to support the ICA's central claim that Putin helped Trump win.

Sketchy Source

Brennan's informant is believed to be Oleg Smolenkov, who previously worked in the U.S. Embassy in Washington and later as a government foreign policy adviser in Moscow, before moving back to the D.C. area in early 2017.

Brennan said his source could not be revealed because Putin might have him executed. However, reporters easily found Smolenkov living in a six-bedroom home in Stafford, Va., listed in his and his wife's real names.

It's not known if Smolenkov was paid for his information. The CIA and FBI declined to comment.

The highly classified version of the ICA did not fully identify Smolenkov, referring to him in "abbreviated" form. It described him as "an established source" but with only "secondhand access" to Kremlin information. That is, he was only repeating what an unnamed source had told him.

Then, in describing the "raw intelligence" he provided, the ICA conceded that it had no insight into Smolenkov's own source: "The exact circumstances in which the subsource obtained the information on Putin's plans were not explicitly clear."

Explaining why NSA dissented from the key Putin conclusion, former NSA Director Adm. Mike Rogers argued the human source it was based on "did not have direct access" to insider information about Putin. Also, he added, "I didn't see multiple sources."

Foreign press outlets have noted that Smolenkov "would not have direct access to secret information at either the Russian Embassy in the U.S. or while working for the presidential administration in Moscow."

Yet Smolenkov was also Brennan's source for the ICA claim that Putin ordered allegedly hacked DNC material to be leaked to WikiLeaks.

"The established source with secondhand access provided us our only specific information on Putin's order to pass collected material to WikiLeaks," the highly classified version of the ICA stated.

He was also the source for "the reported role of the [Russian] Federal Security Service (FSB) hacking operations related to the U.S. election," the classified ICA said.

Harvey, the lead author of the explosive congressional report, told RCI that in addition to the 46-page review declassified by the Office of National Intelligence, the House panel also produced a 17-page condensed classified version for members of Congress – including Democratic Reps. Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell, who continue to speculate that Trump is compromised by Putin – plus a 200-page version with additional footnotes, as well as other supporting material.

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2025/07/24/how_obama_admin_turned_unverifiable_report_into_ru ssiagate_dynamite_1124640.html


djohn2oo8 Get in here NOW motherfucker!!!!!!

[TSA]

https://x.com/TheJusticeDept/status/1948139213628592566

https://x.com/nicksortor/status/1948198774779568451

https://x.com/TrashDiscourse/status/1948125652953215477

Of course all the perps are running to CNN :lol

[TSA]

https://x.com/VetWarrior76/status/1948244681504260505

Periodic reminder that Winehole23 a TDS is a cultist, he is immune to facts and reason.

Motivated paranoid belief is everything.

https://x.com/paulsperry_/status/1947130252959887361

[ChumpDumper]

Nothing is going to happen.

Black President remains undefeated.

[ChumpDumper]

I’ll take Andrew McCarthy’s legal opinion over yours and Nono’s. No hard feelings.

By Andrew C. McCarthy
July 21, 2025 6:30 AM
The director of national intelligence makes a frivolous argument.

...I contended that the Trump administration’s decision to revive this episode, while titillating for the MAGA political base, was self-sabotage. That is mainly because, after months of scrutiny, the Trump CIA has reaffirmed the ICA’s conclusions that (1) Russia sought to interfere in the 2016 election and (2) did so in order to denigrate Hillary Clinton — i.e., Kremlin strongman Vladimir Putin anticipated that Clinton would be elected and hoped to make her a less effective president, which would be in Russia’s interest as America’s geopolitical rival...

the principal flaw in Ratcliffe’s report — which he accompanied with a referral to the Justice Department, as did Gabbard in her press release — was its attempt to manufacture a false statement in order to generate a predicate for renewed investigation and potential prosecution of Obama officials.

In a nutshell, Ratcliffe suggested that Obama CIA Director John Brennan’s 2023 House testimony — that the CIA opposed inclusion of the bogus Steele dossier in the ICA — was inconsistent with emails Brennan had sent seven years earlier, as the ICA was being prepared, in which he argued in favor of the dossier’s inclusion in the ICA. On even cursory examination, this was specious. In the 2016 emails, Brennan was arguing his personal position; by contrast, his 2023 testimony laid out the CIA’s institutional position, which was against the dossier’s inclusion. Not only is the 2023 testimony true; it is proven true by the 2016 emails, which were in response to top CIA officials (including Brennan’s deputy), who asserted that the agency broadly opposed inclusion of the dossier. (Brennan’s colleagues largely succeeded in having it excluded: a streamlined summary was included in an annex but not in the ICA’s analysis.) To repeat what I posited, a false-statements case cannot be based on true statements (even if we assume, as I do, that Brennan was being cagey in the 2023 testimony). There is, therefore, no basis in the new CIA report for an investigation of Brennan. (Ratcliffe reportedly also recommended that the DOJ investigate James Comey, the Obama-appointed FBI director later fired by Trump, though it’s unclear why.)

Gabbard’s press release attempts the same kind of legerdemain. She claims that in the run-up to and the immediate aftermath of the 2016 election, Obama intelligence officials, including then-DNI James Clapper, took the position that Russia was “probably not trying . . . to influence the election by using cyber means.” But later, as top Obama administration officials huddled and executed the rapid-fire completion of the ICA, Gabbard says the administration changed its tune and claimed that Russia had used cyber means to interfere in the election.

It’s a frivolous argument. The original (and true) claims that Russia was not engaged in cyber espionage were unambiguously referring to cyberattacks on election infrastructure. Try as she might, even Gabbard cannot get around this in the press release and the selectively redacted documents she released — e.g., Clapper’s December 7, 2016, statement: “Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome” (emphasis added). This is true: No one believed that Russian operatives had tried to attack election machines and the like. As officials explained post-election, the U.S. presidential contest involves 50 state elections that use various, redundant measures to prevent the possibility of hacking; even a regime with capable intelligence services, such as Russia’s, could not manipulate the results through cyberattacks.

Nonexistent cyber intrusions on election infrastructure are different, not just in degree but in kind, from what the Obama intelligence officials settled on, which was that Russia had conducted cyberattacks (1) to hack the DNC emails and (2) to promote anti-Clinton political messaging. The fact that the Obama officials claimed that Russia was responsible for those operations is not contradicted by those same officials’ admission that Russia didn’t conduct cyber ops against voting machines....

To be sure, the FISA application relied on the dossier and was appallingly shoddy. That said, it demonstrates that, even before the election (and weeks before the ICA), Obama intelligence officials had a cyber-espionage theory of Russian interference that focused on hacking and campaign messaging, not election infrastructure. Gabbard’s allegation that his theory was concocted post-election is obviously wrong.

"Toward the conclusion of Gabbard’s press release comes this thundering claptrap:
After months of investigation into this matter, the facts reveal this new assessment [i.e., the ICA] was based on information that was known by those involved to be manufactured i.e. the Steele Dossier or deemed as not credible. This was politicized intelligence that was used as the basis for countless smears seeking to delegitimize President Trump’s victory, the years-long Mueller investigation, two Congressional impeachments, high level officials being investigated, arrested, and thrown in jail, heightened US-Russia tensions, and more."

Down here on Planet Earth, the use of the Steele dossier has been roundly condemned in government investigations (as it was in Ratcliffe’s new report). The Mueller probe, despite being staffed by anti-Trump partisans, concluded that there was no evidence of Trump-Russia collusion and did not delve into the dossier and the FISA debacle. No one who was prosecuted as a result of the Mueller investigation was charged with offenses related to the Steele dossier or the ICA. Trump’s two impeachments pertained to Ukraine and the Capitol riot — neither had anything to do with Russiagate or the 2016 ICA. And while it is characteristic of Gabbard to blame the United States for “heightened US-Russia tensions,” they have in fact been heightened because of Russia’s annexation of its neighbors’ territories and the monstrous war crimes it has committed in Ukraine.

DNI Gabbard concludes by assuring us: “The issue I am raising is not a partisan issue.” Well, that’s a relief.

https://archive.is/20250723202544/https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/07/russiagate-re-revisited-gabbard-urges-doj-to-prosecute-obama-officials/#selection-999.0-1017.110

[Trill Clinton]

1947775040876843226

[TSA]

1947775040876843226

Russian meddling isn't what's in question. Same failed obfuscation attempt as Winehole.

You're better than this Trill.

[ChumpDumper]

Russian meddling isn't what's in question. Same failed obfuscation attempt as Winehole.

You're better than this Trill.


I’ll take Andrew McCarthy’s legal opinion over yours

Even if TSA was reading my posts, he would never respond to this magnificent own goal.

[TSA]

https://x.com/TheJusticeDept/status/1948139213628592566


https://x.com/nedryun/status/1948383941825626232

Colonel Harvey, the author of the report that was released yesterday, on Warroom said Tulsi is laying out a roadmap and people need to read it.
He also listed some examples of reports that will be declassified and put out.
1. Durham report classified annex on HRC plan to link Putin to Trump.
2. Durham report classified annex on the Steele Dossier.
3. IG classified annexes on the connection to the Steele dossier.

And he said the Strike Force already has a lot of documents.
He said Wray, Barr and Pompeo blocked Nunes team from interviewing people.

https://x.com/MizDonna69/status/1948398663018889494

[TSA]

https://x.com/TrashDiscourse/status/1948125652953215477

Of course all the perps are running to CNN :lol

Another segment :rollin

https://x.com/WesternLensman/status/1948355086721397012

[ChumpDumper]

Intel bureaucrats make shitty legal arguments tbh.

[Spurs Homer]

Holy shit - this is a bombshell!

Obama installed Hillary as president!




RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES!

[TSA]

https://x.com/nedryun/status/1948475272090808424

https://x.com/WesternLensman/status/1948473577071583406

https://x.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1948467608132727159
djohn2oo8 Get in here NOW motherfucker!!!!!! :rollin

[ChumpDumper]

I’ll take Andrew McCarthy’s legal opinion over yours

[Winehole23]

John Durham investigated the purported Obama plot against Trump for four years and lost two out of the three cases he brought

You'd think TSA would recall that

[DarrinS]

BlueAnon not even mad they got brain damaged for years. :downspin:

[Winehole23]

^^^ glib as well as incoherent, how drunk are you right now, Darrin?

[DarrinS]

^^^ glib as well as incoherent, how drunk are you right now, Darrin?

I see you're still living your best life. Be back in a few weeks. Too boring and partisan here.

[Spurs Homer]

If all this is true - im gonna be pissed that Hillary became president!

[Winehole23]

The Steele dossier was an annex and was not considered very credible by the FBI, nor was it substantially relied upon

That's according to the Senate Intelligence Committee that Marco Rubio chaired in 2020


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:oyijun4tunao777bpfxlpxvr/bafkreig47cdwz2w4fxtfrer7gngbgdsrhpql4aoyhqxbds56n wcz2rxemy@jpeg

The conclusion that there was Russian interference did not rely on the Steele Dossier or dodgy HUMINT


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:oyijun4tunao777bpfxlpxvr/bafkreicwgskwrgaeq5p5xlizz4zdotm2dec75tmwsqnx2fzwr 3nskzdcda@jpeghttps://www.intelligence.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/sites-default-files-documents-report-volume4.pdf

[Winehole23]

The former senior CIA officer who helped oversee the 2017 intelligence assessment on Russia’s interference in the 2016 election says Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and the White House are “lying” when they claim that it was an attempt to sabotage President Donald Trump.


Susan Miller, a retired CIA officer who helped lead the team that produced the report about Russia’s actions during the 2016 campaign, told NBC News it was based on credible information that showed Moscow sought to help Trump win the election, but that there was no sign of a conspiracy between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign.



“The director of national intelligence and the White House are lying, again,” Miller said. “We definitely had the intel to show with high probability that the specific goal of the Russians was to get Trump elected.”


She added: “At the same time, we found no two-way collusion between Trump or his team with the Russians at that time.”
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna220870

[Winehole23]

She said that when her team briefed Trump and others about their assessment in 2017, they made clear there was no way to gauge the impact of the Russian information warfare on the vote, and that Trump was the country’s lawful commander in chief.


“Both me and my team readily acknowledged — to Trump and others in the USG [U.S. government] we briefed — that we could not say if this attempt by the Russians actually worked unless someone polled every single Trump voter to see if this disinformation was what led them to vote for Trump,” she said.


“Both my team and I and DCIA [the director of the CIA] said clearly in our report to Trump himself and to the intel committees [in Congress] that Trump was our president,” Miller said.


Trump thanked the CIA director for the briefing, Miller said.


“That part was left out by Gabbard,” Miller said.

[velik_m]

https://bsky.app/profile/meidastouch.com/post/3lujbofsg4c2f

[TSA]

The Steele dossier was an annex and was not considered very credible by the FBI
:rollin


nor was it substantially relied upon
:rollin


The conclusion that there was Russian interference did not rely on the Steele Dossier or dodgy HUMINT

:rollin

In light of the blockbuster revelation last week that the Obama ICA on Russian meddling was based on lies known to the FBI and CIA at the time, it’s worth revisiting the Steele dossier “annex” that was included in the ICA.

By the time the ICA was ordered, written, and published, Christopher Steele had already been fired as a source by the FBI for leaking his dossier to the media. The FBI knew he was no longer a source, they knew who he leaked to, and they knew what he leaked.

And despite that knowledge, the “annex” fraudulently referred to Steele as an “FBI source” at least 11 separate times, including in the heading on the document: “Additional Reporting From an FBI Source on Russian Influence Efforts.”

The FBI knew Steele was not an FBI source at the time, but chose to deliberately lie about that.

Later in the annex, the document claimed that “the source’s reporting appears to have acquired by multiple Western press organizations, starting in October.” The FBI knew Steele gave it to those outlets. The FBI knew Steele was being funded by the Clinton campaign. The FBI lied about and omitted these facts in the ICA “annex.”

The FBI “annex” also falsely claimed that Steele’s reporting had been “corroborated.” Not only did the FBI not corroborate any of Steele’s anti-Trump claims, it was aware that many were outright fabrications.

In addition to the scores of lies peddled in the Steele dossier “annex” to the ICA, we also know that former CIA director John Brennan repeatedly lied, including to Congress, when he claimed the main ICA body never included or referenced claims from the bogus Steele dossier.

The only question now is whether Brennan and Comey will finally be held accountable for the fraudulent conspiracy which they are still actively perpetrating against the U.S.

https://x.com/seanmdav/status/1949874800739987653

[Spurs Homer]

:lmao

"thank you sir- may i have another!"


hahahahahahahahahahahaha! TSA

[TSA]

https://x.com/paulsperry_/status/1949489101725479114

https://x.com/GuntherEagleman/status/1949474799438463060

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao TSAnon falls for it every time.

[TSA]

Details Buried In Recently Declassified Docs Further Implicate Obama In Russia Hoax

Documents released over the last month have exposed a post-election plot designed to derail President Donald Trump’s first term. The recently declassified material reveals former President Barack Obama sought to continue the Russia-collusion hoax Hillary Clinton had launched during the presidential campaign by directing select members of his intelligence community to craft the deceptive Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) on Russia’s efforts to influence the 2016 election. However, a close reading of these documents reveals Obama holds even more culpability than previously discussed.

As The Federalist reported earlier, the CIA’s review of the ICA established Obama not only knew of and “condoned the politicalization of the intelligence community, but that the former president directed the politicalization.” According to the CIA’s “lessons learned” analysis of the deceptive ICA released by the Obama Administration, on December 6, 2016, then-President Obama directed “then-Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper to conduct a comprehensive review of all available intelligence and provide the IC’s best assessment of Russian activities related to the election,” ordering Clapper to complete the review before Trump’s inauguration. And according to former CIA Director John Brennan, the White House worked with him to “established crucial elements of the process,” including directing the CIA to take “the lead drafting the report.”

That White House-directed process included sidelining the National Intelligence Council (“NIC”) which, under standard protocols held “control over drafting assignments, coordination, and review processes” for intelligence assessments. Not only that, but Brennan — the man Obama charged with leading the drafting of the ICA — also marginalized CIA and ODNI analysts, ignoring their conclusion that intel did not support the view that Russia “aspired” to help Trump win the 2016 election. Brennan also trumped the analysts’ objection to referencing the Steele dossier in the text of the ICA and including a summary of the Clinton-funded fake dossier in an annex to the report.

Last week’s release of the House Permanent Selection Committee on Intelligence’s (“HPSCI”) report summarizing the results of its investigation into the drafting of the ICA exposed further corruption behind the assessment that falsely reported Russia aspired to help elect Trump. That 46-page report revealed how, after the election, Brennan ordered the publication of three substandard intelligence reports which, along with the Steele dossier, “became foundational sources for the ICA judgments that Putin preferred Trump over Clinton.”

The HPSCI report also detailed the flaws in that intel, as well as how the ICA further misrepresented what the belatedly created intelligence reports stated. The HPSCI report further highlighted the extensive evidence omitted from the ICA — intel which conflicted with the Obama-ordered assessment’s conclusion that Russia aspired to help Trump. The Federalist summarized these top take-aways last week.

However, the recently declassified HPSCI report also revealed a more subtle — but equally significant — detail, namely Obama’s role in hiding intel from the analysts responsible for drafting the ICA.

“Investigators as well as the ICA authors were denied access to a trove of information on grounds of executive or congressional privilege,” the HPSCI report explained. According to the report, one FBI analyst argued the intel should be shared with analysts, but “that the Obama Administration denied ICA drafters access to this intelligence on grounds of Executive or Congressional privilege.”

While it is unclear what intel would be protected by congressional privilege, executive privilege rests in the president of the United States, meaning Barack Obama prevented the drafters of the ICA from reviewing relevant information.

What intel Obama directed Brennan and others to keep from those drafting the ICA is also unclear, but the recent release by Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, of internal emails related to the ICA suggest the material withheld under the guise of executive privilege, or elsewise, was extensive.

A little over a week ago, Director Gabbard released a report revealing that soon after Obama ordered the rushed crafting of the ICA, a top official in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) eighty-sixed an already completed President’s Daily Brief that concluded Russia had not hacked the 2016 presidential election. As The Federalist reported at the time, emails declassified by Director Gabbard indicate the ODNI “buried the PDB to provide the intelligence community cover to issue a contrary assessment concerning Russia’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 election — and did so, against the recommendations of a wide array of intelligence professionals.”

In addition to that explosive news, another email thread in the hundred-plus pages of declassified emails revealed another shocking detail: The intelligence officer charged with conducting an “analytic scrub” of the “noncompartmented” version of the ICA had no knowledge that the ICA report referenced, much less relied upon, the Steele dossier.

Director Gabbard’s report referred to this analyst as an “ODNI Whistleblower,” noting that he was shocked when asked as part of a FOIA request in September of 2019 to search email systems for material related to the Steele dossier, being told “the dossier was a factor in the 2017 ICA on the election interference in which an assessment of the document was added as an annex.”

“I am choosing my words carefully, for your awareness, because the premise of the message is concerning,” the ODNI whistleblower wrote in response to learning the dossier was relied upon in completing the ICA. Then, after explaining his role in the development of the ICA, the whistleblower stressed, “[i]t included no dossier reference that I recall.” Further, “[a]t no point did [redacted name] suggest that there was any analytically significant reporting that I was NOT seeing, with the exception of compartmented material.” And here, the whistleblower noted that he had “asked repeatedly” whether there was any analytically significant reporting because of “concerns” he held regarding a key judgment of the analysis.

“At no point did I see or consider what I gather is, or was represented to be, ‘dossier’ materials,” the ODNI whistleblower’s email to another member of ODNI continued, adding that he “heard second hand from [redacted name], ostensibly recounting words of then DNI Clapper, on the day of a briefing to current [then, I think, just elect] POTUS, about inclusion of dossier materials in a presentation to POTUS elect. This was characterized as an unexpected and unwanted sudden and unilateral act by then DIR FBI Comey, and as a source of concern to the DNI.”

Of course, that was not true, as both Director Clapper and CIA Director Brennan colluded with Comey to include the dossier in an annex. But the DNI intelligence officer, turned ODNI whistleblower, who worked on the ICA knew nothing about the assessment’s reliance on the dossier. This led him to conclude that “IF the Dossier material WAS used by the NIC, unless it is also compartmented,” he was “deceived and excluded [] from things [he] was cleared for and had need to know, . . . .”

Here, the ODNI whistleblower is both right — and wrong. He properly concludes that he was deceived and excluded from things he was cleared for and had a need to know, but he inaccurately assumes that if the dossier was “compartmented” there was no concern.

“Compartmented” information is tightly held intelligence that is accessible only to specifically identified and approved individuals. The ODNI whistleblower noted in his emails that he had not “participate[d] in the crafting of the compartmented version” of the ICA, assuming that fact might explain away his ignorance about the ICA’s reliance on the Steele dossier.

But that does not explain why the Steele dossier was compartmented in the first place. Or rather, it does: to keep the honest analysts responsible for finalizing the classified and unclassified version of the ICA from discovering the shady and fake intel Brennan buried in the compartmented version.

In discussing the compartmentalizing of the intel for the ICA, the CIA’s report questioned “whether the extreme limitations on access to underlying intelligence within the IC during the ICA’s preparation was justified.” Here, the CIA stressed that the “ICA had been shared with more than 200 US officials.” “This is unusually high for such a highly compartmented product,” the CIA noted in questioning the compartmentalization of the materials.

While the compartmentalized version of the ICA has yet to be declassified, the HPSCI report released last week reveals large swaths of intel that were included only in the compartmentalized version and thus withheld from analysts working on the classified and unclassified versions. The HPSCI report stressed this point, explaining “the highly compartmented nature of the raw reporting made it difficult or impossible for most readers to see the foundational sources.”

The Steele dossier was but one of the documents included in the compartmentalized ICA but excluded from the public and classified versions of the report. This reality becomes clear when you compare what the HPSCI report states about the ICA with the previously classified version of the ICA that Director Gabbard recently released.

For example, in the previously classified version, Annex A is entitled “Possible State-Level Election Network Breaches and Related Intrusions.” In contrast, Annex A in the Compartmented ICA is entitled “Additional Reporting from an FBI Source on Russian Influence Efforts.” Also omitted from the previously classified version of the ICA is the fourth bullet of supporting evidence for the assessment that the Russian “influence campaign aspired to help (Trump’s) chances of victory,” that referred the reader to the detailed summary and analysis of the dossier.

The HPSCI report also revealed that the Compartmented ICA explained that it made “some judgments based on the reporting of an established clandestine source with secondhand access through identified subsources.” “The source is well established, and other examples of reporting have been corroborated through other streams of human and signals intelligence,” according to the Compartmented ICA. The Compartmented ICA added that that “established source with secondhand access provided us our only specific information on President Vladimir Putin’s order to pass collected material to Wikileaks: the timing of the formal influence campaign; the existence of specific, planned Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) efforts; some specific details of Putin’s views of Secretary Clinton; and the reported role of the Federal Security Service (FSB) hacking operations related to the US election.”

That single source had reported in July that “Putin had made this decision [to leak DNC emails] after he had come to believe that the Democratic nominee had better odds of winning the U.S. presidential election, and that [candidate Trump], whose victory Putin was counting on, most likely would not be able to pull off a convincing victory.” Then after Obama directed Brennan to craft the ICA, the former CIA director ordered that purported intel to be documented — something that had not been done at the time the source made the claim. It then served as the sole source of classified information cited in support of the conclusion that Putin aspired to help Trump win the election.

As the HPSCI report detailed, beyond the flaws in the intel — including that it was single-sourced and based on a sub-source’s supposed insight into Putin’s perspective — the “whose victory Putin was counting on” was hopelessly ambiguous. As one senior CIA officer put it, “We don’t know what was meant by that,” with “five people read[ing] it five ways.” Also, as the HPSCI report highlighted, that statement was made before Trump was officially nominated at the Republican convention, making it more reasonable to believe Putin meant he was counting on Trump winning the Republican nomination.

But that single-source intel remained compartmentalized, preventing those reviewing the classified and public versions of the ICA from learning of those flaws. In fact, the previously classified and public versions of the ICA made no reference to the single “clandestine” source discussed in the compartmentalized ICA. Instead, the noncompartmentalized reports stated that “[m]any of the key judgments in this assessment rely on a body of reporting from multiple sources that are consistent with our understanding of Russian behavior.” The noncompartmented ICAs also represented that “[i]nsights into Russian efforts — including specific cyber operations — and Kremlin views of key US players like President-elect Trump and Secretary Clinton derive from multiple corroborating sources.”

Given the many problems with the single-source reporting used to supposedly support the idea that Putin aspired for Trump to win, it is readily apparent why Obama’s minions sought to keep that “intel” compartmentalized. In fact, it is only now, nearly five years after HPSCI, under the leadership of then-Chair Devin Nunes, completed its investigation into the ICA, that Americans are learning these details. Before last week’s declassification, the HPSCI report remained sequestered at CIA headquarters: Even the current HPSCI chair lacked access to the report until recently.

With the compartmentalized version of the ICA still classified — and possibly still compartmentalized at the CIA — the HPSCI report proves indispensable for understanding what supposed intel Obama withheld from the intelligence community under the guise of executive privilege or by directing Clapper, Brennan, Comey, and crew to limit access to the materials.

Not only does this represent a scandal in its own right, but Sunday on Sunday Morning Futures, former HPSCI Chair Nunes told Maria Bartiromo he believes the Biden Administration raided Mar-a-Lago in part to look for a copy of the HPSCI’s report. Given the former Republican congressman’s track record in exposing the Russia-collusion hoax and the corruption of the intelligence community, DOJ, and FBI, odds are he’s right — and that would mean the conspiracy launched nearly a decade ago by then-President Obama continued after he left office and well within any statute of limitations.

https://thefederalist.com/2025/07/28/details-buried-in-recently-declassified-docs-further-implicate-obama-in-russia-hoax/

[ChumpDumper]

Why are you trying to distract from the Epstein files?

[TSA]

https://x.com/BrookeSingman/status/1949906069171687867

[ChumpDumper]

https://x.com/BrookeSingman/status/1949906069171687867

https://coin-images.coingecko.com/coins/images/67364/large/P4GUiDOM_400x400-2-2.jpg?1752569669

[Spurs Homer]

lol "sources"

[Winehole23]

Lightly modified old bullshit is a category of post in this thread -- quasi lit-crit


And now, the plot twist: Kash Patel, a man so passionately devoted to this theory that he literally wrote a kids’ book about it, unveils the document that should supply the final proof—but instead, it provides a definitive debunking. It’s like a mystery novel where the murderer almost succeeds in implicating someone else, only to plant a clue so obviously fake it gives him away.

Of course, in a mystery novel, the truth comes out and the story is over. In our reality, pro-Trump media (and their left-wing useful idiots like Matt Taibbi) will continue to insist that the fake clue is real, and Wizard Kash will say he’s got even more magic up his sleeve—that is, more “explosive” evidence from that FBI backroom. No doubt it will be enough to keep the base distracted for a little while longer.https://www.thebulwark.com/p/how-kash-patel-fbi-director-duped-russiagate-hoax-smoking-gun-durham-annex

[Spurs Homer]

looking more and more like...

that "raw" steele dossier...was more about epstein/trump pedophilia- than trump/russian prostitutes golden showers...

and its looking more and more like - the israelis (mossad) and the ruskies - both got a hold of those files and have been handling trump like the compromised asset he has always been...

that is how "raw intelligence" usually works...there is always something accurate and somethings not as accurate in these initial assessments...

the cultists though - fall for every rabbit hole that their dear leader leads them to....which is why the term "useful idiots" never dies...

[ChumpDumper]

:lol morons

1952756099603464426

https://x.com/Kasparov63/status/1952756099603464426

[Spurs Homer]

oof!


<strong>
https://youtu.be/OAnQaAVbFVI?si=5KIxP_ppBrPimvQN

[Blake]

https://x.com/VetWarrior76/status/1948244681504260505

Periodic reminder that Winehole23 a TDS is a cultist, he is immune to facts and reason.

Motivated paranoid belief is everything.

You're pimping for a felon. Trump is a felon. That actually happened.

[Blake]

Details Buried In Recently Declassified Docs Further Implicate Obama In Russia Hoax

Documents released over the last month have exposed a post-election plot designed to derail President Donald Trump’s first term. The recently declassified material reveals former President Barack Obama sought to continue the Russia-collusion hoax Hillary Clinton had launched during the presidential campaign by directing select members of his intelligence community to craft the deceptive Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) on Russia’s efforts to influence the 2016 election. However, a close reading of these documents reveals Obama holds even more culpability than previously discussed.

As The Federalist reported earlier, the CIA’s review of the ICA established Obama not only knew of and “condoned the politicalization of the intelligence community, but that the former president directed the politicalization.” According to the CIA’s “lessons learned” analysis of the deceptive ICA released by the Obama Administration, on December 6, 2016, then-President Obama directed “then-Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper to conduct a comprehensive review of all available intelligence and provide the IC’s best assessment of Russian activities related to the election,” ordering Clapper to complete the review before Trump’s inauguration. And according to former CIA Director John Brennan, the White House worked with him to “established crucial elements of the process,” including directing the CIA to take “the lead drafting the report.”

That White House-directed process included sidelining the National Intelligence Council (“NIC”) which, under standard protocols held “control over drafting assignments, coordination, and review processes” for intelligence assessments. Not only that, but Brennan — the man Obama charged with leading the drafting of the ICA — also marginalized CIA and ODNI analysts, ignoring their conclusion that intel did not support the view that Russia “aspired” to help Trump win the 2016 election. Brennan also trumped the analysts’ objection to referencing the Steele dossier in the text of the ICA and including a summary of the Clinton-funded fake dossier in an annex to the report.

Last week’s release of the House Permanent Selection Committee on Intelligence’s (“HPSCI”) report summarizing the results of its investigation into the drafting of the ICA exposed further corruption behind the assessment that falsely reported Russia aspired to help elect Trump. That 46-page report revealed how, after the election, Brennan ordered the publication of three substandard intelligence reports which, along with the Steele dossier, “became foundational sources for the ICA judgments that Putin preferred Trump over Clinton.”

The HPSCI report also detailed the flaws in that intel, as well as how the ICA further misrepresented what the belatedly created intelligence reports stated. The HPSCI report further highlighted the extensive evidence omitted from the ICA — intel which conflicted with the Obama-ordered assessment’s conclusion that Russia aspired to help Trump. The Federalist summarized these top take-aways last week.

However, the recently declassified HPSCI report also revealed a more subtle — but equally significant — detail, namely Obama’s role in hiding intel from the analysts responsible for drafting the ICA.

“Investigators as well as the ICA authors were denied access to a trove of information on grounds of executive or congressional privilege,” the HPSCI report explained. According to the report, one FBI analyst argued the intel should be shared with analysts, but “that the Obama Administration denied ICA drafters access to this intelligence on grounds of Executive or Congressional privilege.”

While it is unclear what intel would be protected by congressional privilege, executive privilege rests in the president of the United States, meaning Barack Obama prevented the drafters of the ICA from reviewing relevant information.

What intel Obama directed Brennan and others to keep from those drafting the ICA is also unclear, but the recent release by Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, of internal emails related to the ICA suggest the material withheld under the guise of executive privilege, or elsewise, was extensive.

A little over a week ago, Director Gabbard released a report revealing that soon after Obama ordered the rushed crafting of the ICA, a top official in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) eighty-sixed an already completed President’s Daily Brief that concluded Russia had not hacked the 2016 presidential election. As The Federalist reported at the time, emails declassified by Director Gabbard indicate the ODNI “buried the PDB to provide the intelligence community cover to issue a contrary assessment concerning Russia’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 election — and did so, against the recommendations of a wide array of intelligence professionals.”

In addition to that explosive news, another email thread in the hundred-plus pages of declassified emails revealed another shocking detail: The intelligence officer charged with conducting an “analytic scrub” of the “noncompartmented” version of the ICA had no knowledge that the ICA report referenced, much less relied upon, the Steele dossier.

Director Gabbard’s report referred to this analyst as an “ODNI Whistleblower,” noting that he was shocked when asked as part of a FOIA request in September of 2019 to search email systems for material related to the Steele dossier, being told “the dossier was a factor in the 2017 ICA on the election interference in which an assessment of the document was added as an annex.”

“I am choosing my words carefully, for your awareness, because the premise of the message is concerning,” the ODNI whistleblower wrote in response to learning the dossier was relied upon in completing the ICA. Then, after explaining his role in the development of the ICA, the whistleblower stressed, “[i]t included no dossier reference that I recall.” Further, “[a]t no point did [redacted name] suggest that there was any analytically significant reporting that I was NOT seeing, with the exception of compartmented material.” And here, the whistleblower noted that he had “asked repeatedly” whether there was any analytically significant reporting because of “concerns” he held regarding a key judgment of the analysis.

“At no point did I see or consider what I gather is, or was represented to be, ‘dossier’ materials,” the ODNI whistleblower’s email to another member of ODNI continued, adding that he “heard second hand from [redacted name], ostensibly recounting words of then DNI Clapper, on the day of a briefing to current [then, I think, just elect] POTUS, about inclusion of dossier materials in a presentation to POTUS elect. This was characterized as an unexpected and unwanted sudden and unilateral act by then DIR FBI Comey, and as a source of concern to the DNI.”

Of course, that was not true, as both Director Clapper and CIA Director Brennan colluded with Comey to include the dossier in an annex. But the DNI intelligence officer, turned ODNI whistleblower, who worked on the ICA knew nothing about the assessment’s reliance on the dossier. This led him to conclude that “IF the Dossier material WAS used by the NIC, unless it is also compartmented,” he was “deceived and excluded [] from things [he] was cleared for and had need to know, . . . .”

Here, the ODNI whistleblower is both right — and wrong. He properly concludes that he was deceived and excluded from things he was cleared for and had a need to know, but he inaccurately assumes that if the dossier was “compartmented” there was no concern.

“Compartmented” information is tightly held intelligence that is accessible only to specifically identified and approved individuals. The ODNI whistleblower noted in his emails that he had not “participate[d] in the crafting of the compartmented version” of the ICA, assuming that fact might explain away his ignorance about the ICA’s reliance on the Steele dossier.

But that does not explain why the Steele dossier was compartmented in the first place. Or rather, it does: to keep the honest analysts responsible for finalizing the classified and unclassified version of the ICA from discovering the shady and fake intel Brennan buried in the compartmented version.

In discussing the compartmentalizing of the intel for the ICA, the CIA’s report questioned “whether the extreme limitations on access to underlying intelligence within the IC during the ICA’s preparation was justified.” Here, the CIA stressed that the “ICA had been shared with more than 200 US officials.” “This is unusually high for such a highly compartmented product,” the CIA noted in questioning the compartmentalization of the materials.

While the compartmentalized version of the ICA has yet to be declassified, the HPSCI report released last week reveals large swaths of intel that were included only in the compartmentalized version and thus withheld from analysts working on the classified and unclassified versions. The HPSCI report stressed this point, explaining “the highly compartmented nature of the raw reporting made it difficult or impossible for most readers to see the foundational sources.”

The Steele dossier was but one of the documents included in the compartmentalized ICA but excluded from the public and classified versions of the report. This reality becomes clear when you compare what the HPSCI report states about the ICA with the previously classified version of the ICA that Director Gabbard recently released.

For example, in the previously classified version, Annex A is entitled “Possible State-Level Election Network Breaches and Related Intrusions.” In contrast, Annex A in the Compartmented ICA is entitled “Additional Reporting from an FBI Source on Russian Influence Efforts.” Also omitted from the previously classified version of the ICA is the fourth bullet of supporting evidence for the assessment that the Russian “influence campaign aspired to help (Trump’s) chances of victory,” that referred the reader to the detailed summary and analysis of the dossier.

The HPSCI report also revealed that the Compartmented ICA explained that it made “some judgments based on the reporting of an established clandestine source with secondhand access through identified subsources.” “The source is well established, and other examples of reporting have been corroborated through other streams of human and signals intelligence,” according to the Compartmented ICA. The Compartmented ICA added that that “established source with secondhand access provided us our only specific information on President Vladimir Putin’s order to pass collected material to Wikileaks: the timing of the formal influence campaign; the existence of specific, planned Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) efforts; some specific details of Putin’s views of Secretary Clinton; and the reported role of the Federal Security Service (FSB) hacking operations related to the US election.”

That single source had reported in July that “Putin had made this decision [to leak DNC emails] after he had come to believe that the Democratic nominee had better odds of winning the U.S. presidential election, and that [candidate Trump], whose victory Putin was counting on, most likely would not be able to pull off a convincing victory.” Then after Obama directed Brennan to craft the ICA, the former CIA director ordered that purported intel to be documented — something that had not been done at the time the source made the claim. It then served as the sole source of classified information cited in support of the conclusion that Putin aspired to help Trump win the election.

As the HPSCI report detailed, beyond the flaws in the intel — including that it was single-sourced and based on a sub-source’s supposed insight into Putin’s perspective — the “whose victory Putin was counting on” was hopelessly ambiguous. As one senior CIA officer put it, “We don’t know what was meant by that,” with “five people read[ing] it five ways.” Also, as the HPSCI report highlighted, that statement was made before Trump was officially nominated at the Republican convention, making it more reasonable to believe Putin meant he was counting on Trump winning the Republican nomination.

But that single-source intel remained compartmentalized, preventing those reviewing the classified and public versions of the ICA from learning of those flaws. In fact, the previously classified and public versions of the ICA made no reference to the single “clandestine” source discussed in the compartmentalized ICA. Instead, the noncompartmentalized reports stated that “[m]any of the key judgments in this assessment rely on a body of reporting from multiple sources that are consistent with our understanding of Russian behavior.” The noncompartmented ICAs also represented that “[i]nsights into Russian efforts — including specific cyber operations — and Kremlin views of key US players like President-elect Trump and Secretary Clinton derive from multiple corroborating sources.”

Given the many problems with the single-source reporting used to supposedly support the idea that Putin aspired for Trump to win, it is readily apparent why Obama’s minions sought to keep that “intel” compartmentalized. In fact, it is only now, nearly five years after HPSCI, under the leadership of then-Chair Devin Nunes, completed its investigation into the ICA, that Americans are learning these details. Before last week’s declassification, the HPSCI report remained sequestered at CIA headquarters: Even the current HPSCI chair lacked access to the report until recently.

With the compartmentalized version of the ICA still classified — and possibly still compartmentalized at the CIA — the HPSCI report proves indispensable for understanding what supposed intel Obama withheld from the intelligence community under the guise of executive privilege or by directing Clapper, Brennan, Comey, and crew to limit access to the materials.

Not only does this represent a scandal in its own right, but Sunday on Sunday Morning Futures, former HPSCI Chair Nunes told Maria Bartiromo he believes the Biden Administration raided Mar-a-Lago in part to look for a copy of the HPSCI’s report. Given the former Republican congressman’s track record in exposing the Russia-collusion hoax and the corruption of the intelligence community, DOJ, and FBI, odds are he’s right — and that would mean the conspiracy launched nearly a decade ago by then-President Obama continued after he left office and well within any statute of limitations.

https://thefederalist.com/2025/07/28/details-buried-in-recently-declassified-docs-further-implicate-obama-in-russia-hoax/

Lol text wall of nothingness

[Spurs Homer]

Lol text wall of russian disinfo/propaganda given to tulsi by whom else? - russia.


fify

[Spurs Homer]

trump when asked if the "deadline" for russia to stop attacking still stands and if he made that clear to putin;

"thats up to putin"

:lmao

[Winehole23]

It's pretty hard to believe that Republicans trying for years to nail Obama for anything -- and failing -- overlooked something really important

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:svawqo4jxobyyuqmixplvcux/bafkreifqrkhd33rowpatt6sbtlokmzxbiwwprpoxnpoptz5w4 ahafu2ujm@jpeghttps://www.wsj.com/world/russia/trump-putin-meeting-russia-goals-327d4d4c?st=hzvp6Y&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

[TSA]

https://x.com/FBIDirectorKash/status/1955068719815684196

https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1955085862191923494

[ChumpDumper]

You don't give a shit about the classification of information.

Why pretend?

[TSA]

https://x.com/FBIDirectorKash/status/1955068719815684196

https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1955085862191923494

https://x.com/94c2500/status/1955421777359933849

[TSA]

https://x.com/mtaibbi/status/1955452050361229408

https://x.com/RealSLokhova/status/1952575795630940340

https://x.com/RealSLokhova/status/1955490210739040611

[Winehole23]

Fine, investigate Schiff

Let the chips fall

[koriwhat]

trump when asked if the "deadline" for russia to stop attacking still stands and if he made that clear to putin;

"thats up to putin"

:lmao

Who cares? Let Ukraine fight all on their own with 0 from us! Not our war, it's Europe's! Fuck them all!

[koriwhat]

looking more and more like...

that "raw" steele dossier...was more about epstein/trump pedophilia- than trump/russian prostitutes golden showers...

and its looking more and more like - the israelis (mossad) and the ruskies - both got a hold of those files and have been handling trump like the compromised asset he has always been...

that is how "raw intelligence" usually works...there is always something accurate and somethings not as accurate in these initial assessments...

the cultists though - fall for every rabbit hole that their dear leader leads them to....which is why the term "useful idiots" never dies...

Are you my brother tbh? You come across just as dense and dimwitted as that retard and I can't tell yall apart. He's fucking mentally ill and retarded just like you. Both on meds and both big pussies!

[ChumpDumper]

Joey dumb.

[TSA]

https://x.com/DNIGabbard/status/1955721194143146226

:bobo

[ChumpDumper]

https://x.com/DNIGabbard/status/1955721194143146226

:bobo
These reports are explicitly about the DNC/DCCC hacks -- which you personally and thoroughly documented as real.

:lmao you didn't even read the tweets you posted.

You're an even worse rube than before you swallowed this.

:bobo

[Spurs Homer]

The cult has been conditioned to swallow every conspiracy -especially at the very beginning where the headlines are like red meat for gullible morons…

its like a hit of their favorite drug….

by the time any actual case with facts and evidence reach the discovery phase…the cult has moved on to the next conspiracy.

TSA will believe any whacko conspiracy…except the most obvious one- that trump is a compromised pedophile and that russia has always had trumps pedophilia evidence to use and abuse trump at will.

[Winehole23]

These reports are explicitly about the DNC/DCCC hacks -- which you personally and thoroughly documented as real.

:lmao you didn't even read the tweets you posted.

You're an even worse rube than before you swallowed this.

:bobogoldfish amplitude of consciousness

or the guile of appearing to be naive known as being coy

hard to say






























TSA got grilled on his own Hibachi, not for the first time

[TSA]

goldfish amplitude of consciousness

or the guile of appearing to be naive known as being coy

hard to say






























TSA got grilled on his own Hibachi, not for the first time

:lol ChumpDumper still humping my leg and begging for attention
:lol ChumpDumper in denial about the Obama directed ICA

[ChumpDumper]

:lol ChumpDumper still humping my leg and begging for attention
:lol ChumpDumper in denial about the Obama directed ICA

It's right there in the email you posted, dipshit. DNC/DCCC hacks. You should read what you post.

You're getting more gullible every day.

[TSA]

https://x.com/C__Herridge/status/1955810062120681868

[ChumpDumper]

You're going to watch Trump bend over and take it straight up the ass from Putin tomorrow.

[TSA]

https://x.com/DepDNILukas/status/1955808068551192945

https://x.com/DepDNILukas/status/1955756307522183233

[ChumpDumper]

https://x.com/DepDNILukas/status/1955808068551192945

https://x.com/DepDNILukas/status/1955756307522183233

"a joint project related to Russian attribution and intent for the DNC/DCCC hacks"

:lol you keep posting it.

[Spurs Homer]

TSA -

Russia just cyberattacked - USA Federal court systems....

Trumps reaction/response: "are you surprised? USA does it too!"

Now imagine Biden saying/responding that way to another russian cyberattack?

You would have walls and walls of faux outrage -

disgusting traitor....

[TSA]

https://x.com/JonathanTurley/status/1955727573389840890

Clapper is scrambling to get on CNN for another interview

[ChumpDumper]

It's astounding how stupid you have become, TSA.

Senate panel finds Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election
Politics Aug 18, 2020 4:49 AM EDT

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump campaign’s interactions with Russian intelligence services during the 2016 presidential election posed a “grave” counterintelligence threat, a Senate panel concluded Tuesday as it detailed how associates of Donald Trump had regular contact with Russians and expected to benefit from the Kremlin’s help.

The nearly 1,000-page report, the fifth and final one from the Republican-led Senate intelligence committee on the Russia investigation, details how Russia launched an aggressive effort to interfere in the election on Trump’s behalf. It says the Trump campaign chairman had regular contact with a Russian intelligence officer and says other Trump associates were eager to exploit the Kremlin’s aid, particularly by maximizing the impact of the disclosure of Democratic emails hacked by Russian intelligence officers.

The report is the culmination of a bipartisan probe that produced what the committee called “the most comprehensive description to date of Russia’s activities and the threat they posed.” The investigation spanned more than three years as the panel’s leaders said they wanted to thoroughly document the unprecedented attack on U.S. elections.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/senate-panel-finds-russia-interfered-in-the-2016-us-election

Are you going to arrest Trump's Secretary of State/National Security Adviser/Archivist for his radical attack on whatever you think is a thing?

[TSA]

Russiagate Releases Lifting a Veil on Surveillance State Abuses

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s office released two damning emails yesterday, the first being a letter from former DNI James Clapper to former FBI head James Comey, former CIA head John Brennan, and then-NSA chief Michael Rogers. Dated December 22, 2016, Clapper’s letter explains how the chiefs should approach writing a new Intelligence Community Assessment, whose conclusion — that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump — had already been reported:

Mike John Jim;

Understand your concern. It is essential that we (CIA/NSA/FBI/ODNI) be on the same page. and are all supportive of the report — in the highest tradition of “that’s OUR story, and we’re stickin’ to it.” This evening, CIA has provided to the NIC the complete draft generated by the ad hoc fusion cell. We will facilitate as much mutual transparency as possible as we complete the report, but, more time is not negotiable,” We may have to compromise on our “normal” modalities, since we must do this on such a compressed schedule.

This is one project that has to be a team sport.

Jim

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!3jQj!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F0763fc8 4-f2b2-4414-9800-59c44220a3c0_1420x910.png

Clapper’s email was in response to a note about “concerns” from Rogers, the NSA chief who never upgraded his agency’s confidence level in the “Russia did it for Trump” conclusion from “moderate” to high. The Rogers letter makes it clear that the head of the Pentagon’s most powerful surveillance agency was being asked to sign off on a conclusion without seeing the most “sensitive” intelligence. From Rogers:

"I asked my team if they’d had sufficient access to the underlying intelligence and sufficient time to review that intelligence. On both points my team raised concerns… I’m concerned that, given the expedited nature of this activity, my folks aren’t fully comfortable saying that they have had enough time to review all of the intelligence to be absolutely confident in their assessments… I do want to make sure that, when we are asked in the future whether we can absolutely stand behind the paper… I’m concerned we are not there yet."

This is a devastating exchange. It shows that in assembling perhaps the most high-profile group analysis since the 2002 National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq’s WMD program, four of America’s most powerful enforcement officials said, “To hell with evidence, let’s just put out a tale and stick with it.”

In the specific context of this scandal, it makes a joke of years of public narratives about Trump, Putin, and Russia. Along with more documents funneled from Kash Patel’s FBI to Just The News asserting that senior Justice Department officials squashed Hillary Clinton corruption investigations, and that Comey gave a middleman access to highly classified information to help plead his case to newspapers like the New York Times, the new Gabbard docs further elucidate how years of Russia mania were built on fraud.

But this cascade of revelations is bringing a more disturbing story into focus. A subtext is the unnerving casualness with which procedural rules were broken. Even before Rogers and the NSA were asked to blindly bless a domestic political probe built in part atop “evidence” from an illegal FISA warrant, the FISA court had begun investigating misuse of the surveillance program. Onetime Trump aide Carter Page is not the only American in a politically sensitive position recently monitored under this dubious legal end-around. There was FISA monitoring of campaign manager Paul Manafort, “non-compliant” use of FISA to investigate the January 6th Capitol breach, even FISA tracking of ordinary Americans overseas applying for benefits.

In the coming weeks you’ll be reading (at Racket, among other places) about wholesale abuse of other surveillance programs. It turns out an alarming number of senior Trump campaign officials from the 2024 cycle were notified about prior FBI surveillance (news about Kash Patel, Dan Scavino, and Jeff Clark receiving such notices has already broken, but more names are coming). Widespread surveillance of congressional officials in a 2017 leak probe was the underlying context of recent revelations suggesting two members, Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell, approved leaks of classified information.

The legacy press is ignoring the releases both because they paint Donald Trump as a victim of overreach and because the press played such a prominent role in the Russiagate corruption. They’re betraying audiences who might be concerned about the larger pattern coming into relief. That story is about intelligence agencies meddling in domestic politics at all — Trump or no Trump — through a list of forbidden practices. We’re about to find out that far more people in the political world were under routine surveillance than previously thought, including mainstream and independent reporters who communicated with political sources of all stripes.

https://www.racket.news/p/russiagate-releases-lifting-a-veil

[ChumpDumper]

:lol no

Russia interfered with the 2016 election in favor of Trump. It has been proved over and over again -- even by Republicans.

This sure made you forget about Trump's hiding the Epstein files and freeing a pedophile tho.

And that was the entire point.

[TSA]

https://x.com/RealSLokhova/status/1955490210739040611

https://x.com/listen_2learn/status/1955823568681365547

[ChumpDumper]

https://x.com/listen_2learn/status/1955823568681365547
Where's the propaganda?

It's a 1000 page report.

Show us what you, TSA, think is garbage in the report.

Fever tweets don't count.

[TSA]

https://x.com/94c2500/status/1955421777359933849

https://x.com/C__Herridge/status/1955686857414529506

[Spurs Homer]

Where are the EPSTEIN files?

[DarrinS]

Russia gate crew not even embarrassed

[ChumpDumper]

Russia gate crew not even embarrassed

About what?

Be specific.

[DarrinS]

About what?

Be specific.

You're existence is sad. Like WH. Later

[DarrinS]

TSA -- nothing you post will ever change their minds. They got suckered on Russiagate and will double and triple down on it. Why waste your time?

[DarrinS]

After all, this a therapeutic place for libtards to vent.

[Spurs Homer]

TSA -- nothing you post will ever change their minds. They got suckered on Russiagate and will double and triple down on it. Why waste your time?


Your cult leader said, in public, “russia, if you are listening….i hope you can attack one of our usa citizens and find those emails…”
5 hours later, russia complied and hacked servers….

in public…which any american with functioning eyes and ears could witness for themselves without any media outlet convincing them either way…

helsinki…again…its on video…trump took the side of russia/putin against his own usa intel- and OUR usa intel…
again…any american with functioning eyes and ears could witness this by just pulling out that youtube video…

a us president committing treason in public and if you still support him- that says everything about you and your patriotism…

jan 6- on live tv- the entire planet witness a us president committing treason and doing nothing for 3 hours as his own govt he swore an oath to

was attacked with people saying live on tv that they were sent there by trump- your own eyes and ears witnessed this

and here you are - calling things you witnessed with your own eyes and ears- a “hoax” and “russiagate”

you got serious issues

[DarrinS]

Your cult leader said, in public, “russia, if you are listening….i hope you can attack one of our usa citizens and find those emails…”
5 hours later, russia complied and hacked servers….

in public…which any american with functioning eyes and ears could witness for themselves without any media outlet convincing them either way…

helsinki…again…its on video…trump took the side of russia/putin against his own usa intel- and OUR usa intel…
again…any american with functioning eyes and ears could witness this by just pulling out that youtube video…

a us president committing treason in public and if you still support him- that says everything about you and your patriotism…

jan 6- on live tv- the entire planet witness a us president committing treason and doing nothing for 3 hours as his own govt he swore an oath to

was attacked with people saying live on tv that they were sent there by trump- your own eyes and ears witnessed this

and here you are - calling things you witnessed with your own eyes and ears- a “hoax” and “russiagate”

you got serious issues

Exhibit A

[ChumpDumper]

You're existence is sad. Like WH. Later


TSA -- nothing you post will ever change their minds. They got suckered on Russiagate and will double and triple down on it. Why waste your time?


After all, this a therapeutic place for libtards to vent.

You'll have to tell us, in your own words, what you're talking about.

I'm going to assume you're just falling for the same stupid shit TSAnon is trying to make happen.

I can explain where you have been taken advantage of by people who are counting on an emotional response from you.

You won't even try.

[Winehole23]

Darrin doesn't even know what he's talking about -- pure handwaving

[Spurs Homer]

Exclusive footage of trump meeting putin;


https://youtu.be/ahRma_l8x10?si=t1TWVfuh8KIOXRqa

[Spurs Homer]

How fitting that trump says "we had to deal with the russia russia hoax" - standing right next to the guy who knows he actually attacked the usa elections...and has even admitted it on stage at helsinki...


how much of a piece of shit are you to be owned by a midget and you have to grovel in his presence - embarrassing the usa - again -

and willingly have to say that the actual russian attack ordered by the midget you are scared shitless of - is standing and smirking as you kneel before the world

the usa is garbage now

i hope putin just releases the pedophilia tapes and get it all over with...

[DarrinS]

Exclusive footage of trump meeting putin;


https://youtu.be/ahRma_l8x10?si=t1TWVfuh8KIOXRqa

He's not embarrassed that he listens to these partisan hags

[ChumpDumper]

He's not embarrassed that he listens to these partisan hags

Still waiting for you to say what's supposed to be shaming us.

[Winehole23]

DarrinS has no idea what he's talking about

[Spurs Homer]

He's not embarrassed that he listens to these partisan hags

guess who else is triggered by these ladies?

foxpropaganda channel

they lost their shit over hearing truth….

[TSA]

https://x.com/Comey/status/1667259969090248704

[ChumpDumper]

TSA will never talk about tariffs or inflation or Epstein again.

This is all he's got.:lol

[Spurs Homer]

TSA: "Forget about the 50,000 trumps lies and his 34 convictions...COMEY LIED to ted kroooze!"


lol

[ChumpDumper]

Honestly Patrick Fitzgerald(!) should be able to get the charges dismissed based simply on Trump and Trump toady social media posts.

[koriwhat]

TSA: "Forget about the 50,000 trumps lies and his 34 convictions...COMEY LIED to ted kroooze!"


lol

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GCoSHfnXQAAP875.jpg

[Spurs Homer]

Honestly Patrick Fitzgerald(!) should be able to get the charges dismissed based simply on Trump and Trump toady social media posts.

yup
will never get to trial…and just to stick to facts, this sham case is not even about comey lying.

Its about trump still trying to re-write his russian treason but that stain will never be washed away no matter how many times magats throw out the “russia russia russia” or the “russiagate” propaganda.it happened and we all saw it.

They just are comfortable lying to themselves i guess…

[ChumpDumper]

https://x.com/Comey/status/1667259969090248704


I’ll take Andrew McCarthy’s legal opinion over yours and Nono’s. No hard feelings.

1971586481832546552

https://x.com/NRO/status/1971586481832546552

No hard feelings.

[Winehole23]

DOJ about to drop their unwinnable case against Comey, which it fired a career prosecutor for not bringing

Pretextual justice undermines the confidence it needs to be effective, every time


Federal prosecutors investigating former FBI Director James Comey (https://abcnews.go.com/US/justice-america-trump-applauds-indictment-dirty-cop-james/story?id=125958551) for allegedly making false statements to Congress determined that a central witness in their probe would prove "problematic" and likely prevent them from establishing their case to a jury, sources familiar with their findings told ABC News.


Daniel Richman -- a law professor who prosecutors allege Comey authorized to leak information to the press -- told investigators (https://abcnews.go.com/US/friend-former-fbi-director-james-comey-subpoenaed-federal/story?id=125666973) that the former FBI director instructed him not to engage with the media on at least two occasions and unequivocally said Comey never authorized him to provide information to a reporter anonymously ahead of the 2016 election, the sources said.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/central-witness-undermines-case-james-comey-prosecutors-concluded/story?id=126311648

[TSA]

https://x.com/Comey/status/1667259969090248704

https://x.com/TishJames/status/1796292561264332946

[Blake]

https://x.com/TishJames/status/1796292561264332946

You're simping for a dude that's a felon and instead of getting punished, he received the highest office in the land.

[ChumpDumper]

https://x.com/TishJames/status/1796292561264332946

Neither case is going anywhere.

Trump is a convicted felon.

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:5o6k7jvowuyaquloafzn3cfw/bafkreiduvxk5gffzatzdj5f3fos6flkwcfkzrwjsei47ymtrt uzpngxwna@jpeghttps://newrepublic.com/post/202897/fbi-informant-alexander-smirnov-lied-biden-released-jail

[SnakeBoy]

bout to get paid :tu

Michael Flynn, former National Security Adviser under President Donald Trump, is in discussions with the Department of Justice (DOJ) to settle a $50 million claim. The claim arises from his previous legal ordeal involving charges of lying to the FBI, which were later dropped. Flynn’s legal team argues that he endured damages due to alleged malicious prosecution and abuse of process.

[Winehole23]

bout to get paid :tu

Michael Flynn, former National Security Adviser under President Donald Trump, is in discussions with the Department of Justice (DOJ) to settle a $50 million claim. The claim arises from his previous legal ordeal involving charges of lying to the FBI, which were later dropped. Flynn’s legal team argues that he endured damages due to alleged malicious prosecution and abuse of process.DOJ reopened a lawsuit it had already got a court to throw out so it could give a crony who helped Trump try to overturn an election $$$

Unprecedented corruption

[ChumpDumper]

bout to get paid :tu

Michael Flynn, former National Security Adviser under President Donald Trump, is in discussions with the Department of Justice (DOJ) to settle a $50 million claim. The claim arises from his previous legal ordeal involving charges of lying to the FBI, which were later dropped. Flynn’s legal team argues that he endured damages due to alleged malicious prosecution and abuse of process.
:lol you want Flynn to have your money

[ChumpDumper]

https://x.com/Comey/status/1667259969090248704

1993010936169611622

https://x.com/kyledcheney/status/1993010936169611622

:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin: rollin

[Spurs Homer]

When is Trump going to complete Putin's order to screw ukraine?

[Spurs Homer]

I mean...its been ten years and no amount of treason and having the usa undressed on the world stage can ever shake this MAGA cult...Russia now has plants working inside the oval to just handle the traitor in chief to make sure russia's agenda happens;

but the cult would rather worship dear leader than save their country;


https://youtu.be/-8YCHwfPPPw?si=6GBuEPfHDKKviTIW

[Spurs Homer]

think back to that trump/zelensky - russian-staged fiasco where they ambushed zelensky....

and its all in the ^ witkoff/russian emails planning it in real time...even down to the putin phone call trump was ordered to take while world leaders were in the oval....

if a script writer from hollywood pitched this - it would be flatly denied and they would make fun of him
("c'mon man - make this realistic - the us president would never be so stupid as to be handled like this")

fuck you cultist traitors...

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:miczfsfixolk42l7343z3bpd/bafkreifx3qw4mw7wvomko276zpvlhacfdrfwzu7vzlsktyeif q2whgcfye

[ChumpDumper]

:lol Kash's beard pilled herself talking to ChatGPT.

[Winehole23]

Flynn fee for doing crimes for Trump


The Justice Department has reached an agreement with President Donald Trump's former national security adviser Michael Flynn (https://abcnews.com/Politics/president-trump-pardons-michael-flynn-pleaded-guilty-lying/story?id=74405950) to pay him roughly $1.2 million to settle a lawsuit brought by the former general claiming he was politically targeted for prosecution during Trump's first administration, sources familiar with the matter tell ABC News.


A federal judge had previously thrown out Flynn's lawsuit in 2024 following a motion to dismiss the suit filed by the Justice Department during the Biden administration, after ruling that Flynn had failed to meet essential elements showing he was a victim of malicious prosecution. But Flynn's attorneys sought to revive their case after President Trump returned to office, and the department disclosed in a filing last year that it had been engaged in settlement talks with his legal team. https://abcnews.com/US/doj-pay-trump-adviser-michael-flynn-1m-settle/story?id=131411111

[Winehole23]

US taxpayers paying $1.2 million to settle Flynn's lawsuit complaining it was unfair that he agreed to plead guilty and admit to lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russia and to secretly lobbying for Turkey.https://bsky.app/profile/dfriedman.bsky.social/post/3mhwoyaikyk2k