PDA

View Full Version : Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions



Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 [90] 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211

Pavlov
02-20-2018, 01:16 PM
Has nothing at all to do with trump, isn’t this pertaining to Manaforts consulting work long before trump?


Sigh, alright guys have fun playing with fire. If you get your wet dream I’ll be hiding out in the mountains until it all dies down. You guys have no idea what you’re playing with in trying to remove this president on bogus trumped up charges. I called trumps election in 2015 and I’m predicting a volatile situation if you are successful. Doubt the trump people are going to sit and take it.


I just don’t understand the insistence on refusing to respect the results of our election? Don’t you see where this could set a bad precedent and lead to worse things? There’s already so much divide and polarization and brinksmanship does anyone really think a coup would go down without incident? When it happens the blood will be on your hands, don’t think you won’t be partly to blame. But I guess if some conservatives got killed by the government goons you’d feel good about that right? I see it all the time, people were actually happy when that republican congressman got shot during the softball game saying he deserved it and other sick comments. Some were even talking shit on the parents of one of the victims in the recent shooting because he was a trump supporter.You people really are animals.


You’re an animal you’re not my countryman. You have been reduced to something disgusting and vile. You represent none of the values that it means to be an American. You’re just vile hateful scum. You’re worse than the average white nationalist who would most likely still help a black person if he were hurt or dying of thirst. Just keep mocking and hating your countrymen you scumbag.


I’m alarmed, you people want us dead and our country destroyed and molded into something unrecognizable. You’re not my countryman either.


flip? Dude, trump had nothing to do with the guy during all of this. He was campaign manager for a small length of time during the primaries. Get a grip on yourself.


Look, Paul Manafort may be in trouble but he is not synonymous with Donald trump.


I’m sure you’ve known someone who got in trouble at some point or another, that doesn’t mean you were in on it. By that logic shouldn’t oprah be charged since she knew trump since the 80s? What about The clintons? They knew him. They were friends before all this election business. She has ties to Russia also. Uranium one? Makes sense to me.


What shady businesses did trump and Manafort do together?


This is worse than conservatives freaking out Over the Nunez memo I saaaiidd

Nothingburger to Civil War in one day.

djohn2oo8
02-20-2018, 01:16 PM
Nothingburger to Civil War in one day.
:lmao

Pavlov
02-20-2018, 01:17 PM
Do you think Holder didn't indict Manafort because he was working with the Podesta Group and Greg Craig?I don't know. Maybe he just didn't lie to investigators back then. Let me know what the latest grocer conspiracy is.

TSA
02-20-2018, 01:21 PM
I don't know. Maybe he just didn't lie to investigators back then. Let me know what the latest grocer conspiracy is.

All 12 counts against Manafort aren't for lying to investigators so that weak cop out attempt won't work for you. Do you think Holder didn't indict Manafort because he was working with the Podesta Group and Greg Craig?

Mark Celibate
02-20-2018, 01:22 PM
Nothingburger to Civil War in one day.
You guys are attempting to take a whole bunch of nothing and try to spin it into impeachment proceedings. THey set the agenda and you minions run out and spread the word and start circle jerking over it. Don’t try to pretend it’s anything else.

RandomGuy
02-20-2018, 01:22 PM
965981901923201025

That was one that struck me as well.

Don't lie to federal prosecutors. Dude is building his case bit by bit. The bottom layer of the pyramid is almost complete, and it seems the next layer is getting prepped.

Pavlov
02-20-2018, 01:25 PM
All 12 counts against Manafort aren't for lying to investigators so that weak cop out attempt won't work for you. Do you think Holder didn't indict Manafort because he was working with the Podesta Group and Greg Craig?Sorry, got the name wrong. I don't know. I have no idea what the investigations back then discovered or didn't discover. I'm sure it's what you believe .

Is this the new grand grocer conspiracy, TSA? Just go ahead and post the rest of the theory from the grocer or whoever pulled your string today.

Pavlov
02-20-2018, 01:27 PM
You guys are attempting to take a whole bunch of nothing and try to spin it into impeachment proceedings. THey set the agenda and you minions run out and spread the word and start circle jerking over it. Don’t try to pretend it’s anything else.Who is "THey"?

Pavlov
02-20-2018, 01:32 PM
Yes. Also involved with the report Manafort commissioned was the Podesta Group and Greg Craig, Skadden Arps partner and Obama White House counsel. Why didn't Holder indict back then?

965997455555821568"Tymoshenko filed a complaint in 2013 with the then-U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder over the payments to Skadden Arps for the report justifying her imprisonment."

That's the only mention of Holder I see there.

TSA, what charges would you have brought against Manafort at that time over that report?

Be specific.

djohn2oo8
02-20-2018, 01:34 PM
Entire Australian delegation coming to US and meeting with all 50 Governors, and DNI expected to be briefed separately. lol shidddddddd

Mikeanaro
02-20-2018, 01:34 PM
You guys are attempting to take a whole bunch of nothing and try to spin it into impeachment proceedings. THey set the agenda and you minions run out and spread the word and start circle jerking over it. Don’t try to pretend it’s anything else.
Something like that would cause a civil war in the 30s, but now you can search for info and get your conclusions, they spent billions and lost the election because people knows Obozo was a failure, if the economy is good people dont give a shit about false accusations, thats why Hillardy lost.

Yesterday minions created a fake trend on Twitter called #TrumpColluded and millions of idiots including that gay asshole Perez Hilton promoted it like it was an actual fact.

The fact that these losers think they are entitled to everything, including facts makes them create their own reality, thank god that kind of ignorant failures are mostly in NY and California.

djohn2oo8
02-20-2018, 01:39 PM
Something like that would cause a civil war in the 30s, but now you can search for info and get your conclusions, they spent billions and lost the election because people knows Obozo was a failure, if the economy is good people dont give a shit about false accusations, thats why Hillardy lost.

Yesterday minions created a fake trend on Twitter called #TrumpColluded and millions of idiots including that gay asshole Perez Hilton promoted it like it was an actual fact.

The fact that these losers think they are entitled to everything, including facts makes them create their own reality, thank god that kind of ignorant failures are mostly in NY and California.
http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/2012/11/real-mad.gif

RandomGuy
02-20-2018, 01:39 PM
All 12 counts against Manafort aren't for lying to investigators so that weak cop out attempt won't work for you. Do you think Holder didn't indict Manafort because he was working with the Podesta Group and Greg Craig?

I think Holder didn't indict because there may not have been enough evidence to merit it at the time. Just spit-ballin' for the normal reason people aren't indicted for things.

Would a career prosecutor bring charges outside an area of investigation to get cooperation from involved, reluctant witnesses to what was really being investigated?

Mikeanaro
02-20-2018, 01:43 PM
http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/2012/11/real-mad.gif
Because I dont fit your shitty agenda? keep trying to reinvent reality...

Mark Celibate
02-20-2018, 01:44 PM
Who is "THey"?
Doesn’t matter, you’re a follower and there’s no proof of any real wrongdoing on trumps behalf despite your attitudes to the contrary.

TSA
02-20-2018, 01:46 PM
Sorry, got the name wrong. I don't know. I have no idea what the investigations back then discovered or didn't discover. I'm sure it's what you believe .

Is this the new grand grocer conspiracy, TSA? Just go ahead and post the rest of the theory from the grocer or whoever pulled your string today.

What's it feel like to have a grocer blogger living in your head rent free?

I don't know what the investigations back then discovered or didn't discover either, but I've got a strong feeling they weren't fully investigated because Manafort was working with the Podesta Group and Greg Craig.

djohn2oo8
02-20-2018, 01:46 PM
Wait, why is TSA posting about Manafort, i thought he said he had nothing to do with Trump? :rollin

Mark Celibate
02-20-2018, 01:50 PM
Something like that would cause a civil war in the 30s, but now you can search for info and get your conclusions, they spent billions and lost the election because people knows Obozo was a failure, if the economy is good people dont give a shit about false accusations, thats why Hillardy lost.

Yesterday minions created a fake trend on Twitter called #TrumpColluded and millions of idiots including that gay asshole Perez Hilton promoted it like it was an actual fact.

The fact that these losers think they are entitled to everything, including facts makes them create their own reality, thank god that kind of ignorant failures are mostly in NY and California.
Pretty much, except a lot of them moved to Texas and added to the infestation we already had going down in Austin. I can’t stand them and they unsettle me to be perfectly honest. Or gross me out rather. These soy-people are not our countrymen.

TSA
02-20-2018, 01:51 PM
Wait, why is TSA posting about Manafort, i thought he said he had nothing to do with Trump? :rollin

The charges he face have nothing to do with Trump, the 20 tweets you posted support that.

boutons_deux
02-20-2018, 02:03 PM
The charges he face have nothing to do with Trump, the 20 tweets you posted support that.

Not yet, but why did Trash hire a nantional campaign manager who worked for, very lucratively, Pootin's puppet in Ukraine?

EVERYBODY around Trash seems to have, or had, connections to Pootin.

Why is Trash obstructing Comey/Mueller investigations?

Why did Trash not implement the Congressional sanctions on Pootin?

Why has Trash done nothing about blocking Pootin fucking around with USA and 2018 elections?

RandomGuy
02-20-2018, 02:05 PM
The charges he face have nothing to do with Trump, the 20 tweets you posted support that.

If he were prosecuted for unrelated crimes, could he be offered immunity for testifying about potential crimes that happened during the campaign that involved Trump?

RandomGuy
02-20-2018, 02:08 PM
What's it feel like to have a grocer blogger living in your head rent free?

I don't know what the investigations back then discovered or didn't discover either, but I've got a strong feeling they weren't fully investigated because Manafort was working with the Podesta Group and Greg Craig.

I've got a strong feeling that your strong feelings are meaningless.

https://assets.itsnicethat.com/system/files/112015/563b992b7fa44cff9d001763/images_slice_large/pizza.gif?1446796803

boutons_deux
02-20-2018, 02:13 PM
Flynn's Secret Meeting with Kislyak was 'No Rogue Action' (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/2/19/1742807/-Flynn-s-Secret-Meeting-with-Kislyak-was-No-Rogue-Action)

It was rather the “good faith” offer to reassure Russia that ‘relief on Sanctions’ was on the way — once Trump was sworn in.

It was the ‘up-front collateral’ on their Quid-pro-Quo agreement. It was a mini-conspiracy that

everyone on the Trump Transition Team was aware of. Sans one, allegedly

senior transition official K.T. McFarland had notified other staff that Flynn would be reaching out to Russian ambassador Sergei Kislyak as part of an effort to repair U.S.-Russian relations,

“which has just handed the U.S.A. election to him [Trump].”

In an email to another transition official, now-homeland security adviser Thomas Bossert, McFarland wrote that “Russia’s response over the next few days” to Flynn’s outreach would be crucial. Per the Times, Bossert then forwarded that December 29th email exchange to at least six other officialsincluding Flynn, Reince Priebus, Stephen Bannon, and Sean Spicer. He added that

everyone needed to “defend election legitimacy now.”

Up til now, Mike Pence has claimed time and again he was “out of loop”.

That he knew nothing of the Flynn peace-offering mission.

That these were all rogue actions, by rouge players — to conduct secret international diplomacy, on a whim, on their own initiative. For the fun of it, apparently.

EVEN THOUGH, Mike Pence was the Boss of every one them — since Pence was the Director of the Transition Team, where this micro-managed “mend the fences conspiracy” occurred.

that everyone needed to “defend election legitimacy now.”

Because that was precisely the Message delivered (https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=232&v=fhiHyWP5T80) by Mike Pence, in his first Press Conference as V.P.-elect, (Jan 11, 2017 (http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=120985), New York City):

that everyone needed to “defend election legitimacy now.”

Because that was precisely the Message delivered (https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=232&v=fhiHyWP5T80) by Mike Pence, in his first Press Conference as V.P.-elect, (Jan 11, 2017 (http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=120985), New York City):

So which is it Mike,

were you “in the loop” of the Bossert directive, or not?

Mr Pence, were you in charge of your own Transition Team, or not — including Michael Flynn’s extra-circular “Diplomatic” activities, or not?

It seems the rest of your Team was well aware of the plan, according to the well-established email-evidence.

AND it would seem that

Mr Pence himself, was “in the direct loop” too, given his phrasing, to “chill” the Media-watchdogs, mere weeks after the Flynn-Kislyak meeting:

Pence: “Why there's been a concerted effort … to delegitimize this election” …

The Trump Team, including Mike Pence, were all singing from the same ‘McFarland-Bossert Hymnal’ in those sketchy, intervening, transition days.

Song Title: "Russia DID NOT (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/12/3/1720751/-One-big-Problem-with-KT-McFarland-s-Alibi-The-Meme-she-was-Mocking-was-NOT-a-Meme-then)interfere with the US Election."

Not in the least bit. Not Ever … because: Largest.Crowd.In.History. Period!

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/2/19/1742807/-Flynn-s-Secret-Meeting-with-Kislyak-was-No-Rogue-Action?detail=emaildkre

Mueller will interrogate KT MacFarland and Bossert?

Pavlov
02-20-2018, 02:33 PM
Doesn’t matter, you’re a follower and there’s no proof of any real wrongdoing on trumps behalf despite your attitudes to the contrary.Actually it does matter.

Who is "they"?

Pavlov
02-20-2018, 02:35 PM
What's it feel like to have a grocer blogger living in your head rent free?It's just really funny you get most of your conspiracies from a grocer. He's really living in your head.


I don't know what the investigations back then discovered or didn't discover either, but I've got a strong feeling they weren't fully investigated because Manafort was working with the Podesta Group and Greg Craig.A thrill going up your leg?

:lol another conspiracy

TSA
02-20-2018, 02:40 PM
Yes. Also involved with the report Manafort commissioned was the Podesta Group and Greg Craig, Skadden Arps partner and Obama White House counsel. Why didn't Holder indict back then?

965997455555821568

"Skadden Arps’ lead attorney on the project was Greg Craig, the former White House counsel to President Obama. Clifford Sloan, a former special envoy to Guantanamo during the Obama administration, also helped with the report, which asserted that the prosecution of Tymoshenko was not politically motivated."

Make that 3 of Obama's people involved.

djohn2oo8
02-20-2018, 02:41 PM
966032264764239872

Mark Celibate
02-20-2018, 02:42 PM
If he were prosecuted for unrelated crimes, could he be offered immunity for testifying about potential crimes that happened during the campaign that involved Trump?
There aren’t any, we would know by now.

djohn2oo8
02-20-2018, 02:42 PM
966031961318928384

TSA
02-20-2018, 02:43 PM
It's just really funny you get most of your conspiracies from a grocer. He's really living in your head.

A thrill going up your leg?

:lol another conspiracy

You bring him up more often than I post articles from him. So what's it feel like to have a grocer blogger living in your head rent free?

Mark Celibate
02-20-2018, 02:52 PM
966031961318928384
All of that has nothing to do with trump or the election though.

clambake
02-20-2018, 03:04 PM
bootlicker mountain man

boutons_deux
02-20-2018, 03:07 PM
The pro-Kremlin talking points of Jill Stein

Trump wasn't the only one promoting pro-Kremlin talking points last year.


By all appearance, Stein seemed more than willing to spout Kremlin talking points at every turn – and all, it appears, for free.

To be sure, Stein received a wealth of support from the Kremlin propaganda channel RT.

Not only was her campaign, as NBC noted (https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/guess-who-came-dinner-flynn-putin-n742696), “heavily promoted by RT,” but

she opted to participate in the 2016 Green Party presidential debate, broadcast on RT (https://www.rt.com/usa/342395-green-party-rt-debate/).

Stein instead lauded the hosts, describing the debate on RT as a “step towards real democracy and an inspiration for … millions of Americans.” :lol

In late 2015, Stein memorably joined Michael Flynn – who recently pled guilty (https://thinkprogress.org/michael-flynn-charged-fbi-bc815c614f54/) for lying about his interactions with Russian officials – and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow at a gala celebrating the ten-year anniversary of RT (https://conference.rt.com/#speakers). Stein later described the attendant RT conference as “inspiring (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3Qhx2ON8RE).”

Stein also shared the conference billing with

Julian Assange – whom Stein in 2016 hailed as a “hero in my book (http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/technology/292305-exclusive-jill-stein-op-ed-in-praise-of-wikileaks),”

and who, remarkably, even made a speaking appearance at the Green Party’s convention.

Stein says she “met Russian President Vladimir Putin (https://www.jill2016.com/photo_gallery_jill_in_paris_and_moscow),” while she recently told Vice that she “didn’t meet” Putin (https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/8x5pw3/jill-stein-profile). :lol

she challenged – and arguably surpassed – Trump in crafting the most Moscow-friendly campaign of 2016.

Stein made the strange claim multiple times (https://www.vox.com/2016/9/14/12913174/jill-stein-green-party) that NATO had “surrounded” Russia with nuclear weapons.

She also said last year that NATO is only fighting “enemies we invent to give the weapons industry a reason to sell more stuff.”

Stein claimed (http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Jill_Stein_Foreign_Policy.htm) that Ukraine’s 2014 revolution was, in reality, a “coup” that the U.S. “helped foment.”

Only two other leaders have described Ukraine’s toppling of former president Viktor Yanukovych as a “coup”: Putin and Kazakhstani President Nursultan Nazarbayev, whose country remains a security ally of Russia.

Stein even spent time last year saying that “Russia used to own Ukraine (https://www.vox.com/2016/9/14/12913174/jill-stein-green-party).”

Stein selected a vice presidential candidate who brought his own Russia-friendly conspiracy theories along. It was a “major false flag operation” designed “to be blamed on the Russians. And that’s exactly what has happened.”

fake Russian Facebook accounts (https://thinkprogress.org/russia-facebook-clinton-campaign-d6d76b2a2e82/) were likewise propping her campaign, as POLITICO uncovered in September (https://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/26/facebook-russia-trump-sanders-stein-243172).

The pro-Stein material also appeared (http://money.cnn.com/2017/09/28/media/blacktivist-russia-facebook-twitter/index.html) on the Twitter feed of the most popular fake Russian account yet uncovered, which called on followers to “Choose peace and vote for Jill Stein. Trust me, it’s not a wasted vote.”

she’s still not convinced Moscow actually attempted to meddle in the election.

https://thinkprogress.org/jill-stein-campaign-russia-ecf424ac3b7e/

Stein doesn't sound very smart

Mark Celibate
02-20-2018, 03:08 PM
bootlicker mountain manbetter than what you lick

clambake
02-20-2018, 03:16 PM
you're a mountain flea.

djohn2oo8
02-20-2018, 03:27 PM
966045715666530304

djohn2oo8
02-20-2018, 03:29 PM
966045140623249408

djohn2oo8
02-20-2018, 03:32 PM
966047515547197440

Pavlov
02-20-2018, 03:39 PM
"Skadden Arps’ lead attorney on the project was Greg Craig, the former White House counsel to President Obama. Clifford Sloan, a former special envoy to Guantanamo during the Obama administration, also helped with the report, which asserted that the prosecution of Tymoshenko was not politically motivated."

Make that 3 of Obama's people involved.What would you have charged them all with back then, TSA?

Pavlov
02-20-2018, 03:39 PM
You bring him up more often than I post articles from him.Prove it.

Mark Celibate
02-20-2018, 03:48 PM
you're a mountain flea.
Cry harder shitstain

clambake
02-20-2018, 04:21 PM
Cry harder shitstain

running to the mountains.

what a patriot!

RandomGuy
02-20-2018, 04:29 PM
All of that has nothing to do with trump or the election though.


Would a career prosecutor bring charges outside an area of investigation to get cooperation from involved, reluctant witnesses to what was really being investigated?

RandomGuy
02-20-2018, 04:35 PM
If [manafort] were prosecuted for unrelated crimes, could he be offered immunity for testifying about potential crimes that happened during the campaign that involved Trump?


There aren’t any, we would know by now.

Um, Manafort has already been indicted.

Unnamed "Person A" in the current indictment (dutch dude) may very well be Manafort's daughter, per the analysis I have read so far. Care to guess which law firm she worked at...?

Mueller is ratcheting up the pressure on Manafort to roll over. This is pretty standard rolling up the chain legal tactic stuff, as has been pointed out to you before.

clambake
02-20-2018, 04:50 PM
If [manafort] were prosecuted for unrelated crimes, could he be offered immunity for testifying about potential crimes that happened during the campaign that involved Trump?



Um, Manafort has already been indicted.

Unnamed "Person A" in the current indictment (dutch dude) may very well be Manafort's daughter, per the analysis I have read so far. Care to guess which law firm she worked at...?

Mueller is ratcheting up the pressure on Manafort to roll over. This is pretty standard rolling up the chain legal tactic stuff, as has been pointed out to you before.

don't worry about what he says. he has stated that he runs from his problems. a real patriot!

Mark Celibate
02-20-2018, 04:59 PM
If [manafort] were prosecuted for unrelated crimes, could he be offered immunity for testifying about potential crimes that happened during the campaign that involved Trump?



Um, Manafort has already been indicted.

Unnamed "Person A" in the current indictment (dutch dude) may very well be Manafort's daughter, per the analysis I have read so far. Care to guess which law firm she worked at...?

Mueller is ratcheting up the pressure on Manafort to roll over. This is pretty standard rolling up the chain legal tactic stuff, as has been pointed out to you before.
There’s nothing to roll over

RandomGuy
02-20-2018, 05:09 PM
There’s nothing to roll over

https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/hilltopviewsonline.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/e/79/e79280e0-b2c9-11e7-a4e7-1b9a182b4f74/59e5411211b6e.image.jpg


I have neither the time, nor the crayons to explain this to you.

Mark Celibate
02-20-2018, 05:11 PM
Keep your hopes up I’m sure you’ll take down drumpf any day now.

RandomGuy
02-20-2018, 05:13 PM
Keep your hopes up I’m sure you’ll take down drumpf any day now. I hope trump goes full fash and you shit your pants.

:lol

Makes your "you hate democracy" BS ring a bit hollow. At this point I have to wonder how many goosestepping fucktwits are out there. I'm sure they are fine people. :rollin

Mark Celibate
02-20-2018, 05:14 PM
Putting words in my mouth like a commie

Mark Celibate
02-20-2018, 05:15 PM
We trump supporters love democracy which you all are trying to undermine with this goose hunt. Respect our free and fair election.

clambake
02-20-2018, 05:23 PM
We trump supporters love democracy which you all are trying to undermine with this goose hunt. Respect our free and fair election.

nah, its too fun.

Mark Celibate
02-20-2018, 05:25 PM
nah, its too fun.
Trump won fair and square, impeachment isn’t a political tool to undermine our election process when it doesn’t go your way.

clambake
02-20-2018, 05:31 PM
Trump won fair and square, impeachment isn’t a political tool to undermine our election process when it doesn’t go your way.

what happened to hillary went my way. i need the other shoe to drop.

Mark Celibate
02-20-2018, 05:35 PM
what happened to hillary went my way. i need the other shoe to drop.
But this country needs something else. We either are a democracy or we aren’t. No in betweens. This can happen again next time the establishment doesn’t win the election if we set this as a precedent.

Chris
02-20-2018, 06:41 PM
965778252857053184

mortgage fraud :lmao

Chris
02-20-2018, 06:43 PM
965976602894131200

Chris
02-20-2018, 06:47 PM
965594582431010816

lmao

Chris
02-20-2018, 06:50 PM
965567210214260736

clambake
02-20-2018, 06:52 PM
tick

tock

Pavlov
02-20-2018, 06:54 PM
lol Chris's entire twittersphere is in meltdown.

Reck
02-20-2018, 06:55 PM
965976602894131200

Lying on the "record" (Random TV show) is same as lying under oath?

Chris
02-20-2018, 06:59 PM
Lying on the "record" (Random TV show) is same as lying under oath?

Why was she lying?

clambake
02-20-2018, 07:00 PM
Why was she lying?

ding

Pavlov
02-20-2018, 07:03 PM
:lol "on the record"

Do you know who the president is, Chris?

Do you really want to go down that road?

Chris
02-20-2018, 07:10 PM
Why was she lying?

Reck
02-20-2018, 07:11 PM
Why was she lying?

Who the fuck knows. People lie.

spurraider21
02-20-2018, 07:13 PM
Rep. Gerald Connolly, D-Va., explicitly asked Comey if Clinton lied to the FBI in that interview. Comey’s response: "I have no basis for concluding that she was untruthful with us."

During a line of questioning with then-Rep. Mick Mulvaney, R-S.C., Comey reiterated, "We do not have a basis for concluding she lied to the FBI."

Here’s another exchange with then-Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, in which Comey repeatedly said he was not aware of any FBI case in which Clinton lied.

Chaffetz: "So Hillary Clinton did come to possess documents and materials that contained classified information via e-mail on these unsecured servers is that correct?"
Comey: "That is correct."
Chaffetz: "Did Hillary Clinton lie?"
Comey: "To the FBI? We have no basis to conclude she lied to the FBI."
Chaffetz: "Did she lie to the public?"
Comey: "That's a question I'm not qualified to answer. I can speak about what she said to the FBI."
Chaffetz: "Did she -- did Hillary Clinton lie under oath?"
Comey: "Not to the FBI. Not in a case we're working."

Chris
02-20-2018, 07:14 PM
Well Comey's word is good enough for me. Lord knows he's never been caught lying.

Chris
02-20-2018, 07:17 PM
966011740990386177

Reck
02-20-2018, 07:17 PM
Well Comey's word is good enough for me. Lord knows he's never been caught lying.

He's never been caught lying. Under oath I presumed you meant.

Chris
02-20-2018, 07:19 PM
He's never been caught lying. Under oath I presumed you meant.

lkCBdsfNQVE

Reck
02-20-2018, 07:19 PM
966011740990386177

How do you figure?

Back when the email server story broke, they never shut up about it.

Why would an indictment on her would cause a media blackout? That would be the story of the year. :lol Chrissy's hateful ways getting in the way of common sense.

Spurtacular
02-20-2018, 07:22 PM
How do you figure?

Back when the email server story broke, they never shut up about it.

Why would an indictment on her would cause a media blackout? That would be the story of the year. :lol Chrissy's hateful ways getting in the way of common sense.

Really, that's what they did, tranny? Who in the media called for Hillary's impeachment?

Chris
02-20-2018, 07:22 PM
How do you figure?

Back when the email server story broke, they never shut up about it.

Why would an indictment on her would cause a media blackout? That would be the story of the year. :lol Chrissy's hateful ways getting in the way of common sense.

No one said anything about a media blackout dummy only that they would go into attack mode. Your common sense is lacking.

Spurtacular
02-20-2018, 07:23 PM
No one said anything about a media blackout dummy only that they would go into attack mode. Your common sense is lacking.

:lol Today's tranny.

Mikeanaro
02-20-2018, 07:25 PM
966011740990386177
Like they did with Comey, first he was a hero and then a 2 headed snake.

Chris
02-20-2018, 07:25 PM
:lol Today's tranny.

:lol

Chris
02-20-2018, 07:26 PM
Like they did with Comey, first he was a hero and then a 2 headed snake.

Bannon also a hero now :tu

Spurtacular
02-20-2018, 07:28 PM
Like they did with Comey, first he was a hero and then a 2 headed snake.

His character was "impeccable".

Reck
02-20-2018, 07:31 PM
No one said anything about a media blackout dummy only that they would go into attack mode. Your common sense is lacking.

No they wouldn't.

Who would attack Mueller?

Reck
02-20-2018, 07:31 PM
Really, that's what they did, tranny? Who in the media called for Hillary's impeachment?

Rent free, mothercfucker. Get some.

Spurtacular
02-20-2018, 07:33 PM
Rent free, mothercfucker. Get some.

:lol Shameless pretense.

Who in the MSM called for Hillary's impeachment? Name one person.

Chris
02-20-2018, 07:36 PM
Who would attack Mueller?

Anybody with a bit of clout on Twitter tbh. Hillary or Obama could drop one tweet attacking Mueller and MSNBC/CNN/etc would run with it for the whole year. Mueller is pushing all the right buttons so far to keep Libs/Dems happy.

spurraider21
02-20-2018, 07:40 PM
:lol Shameless pretense.

Who in the MSM called for Hillary's impeachment? Name one person.
:lol impeach somebody not in government?

Reck
02-20-2018, 07:47 PM
:lol impeach somebody not in government?

No no. We must impeach the then Secretary of state. Because you know...that's apparently a thing according to derp.

Reck
02-20-2018, 07:49 PM
:lol Shameless pretense.

Who in the MSM called for Hillary's impeachment? Name one person.

Where did you get impeach thing from? Burned too many brain cells to come up with a coherent post or what?

:lol No one was talking about impeachment
:lol Hillary getting impeached because in your mind she's the president
:lol Derp's gonna derp

Reck
02-20-2018, 07:50 PM
Anybody with a bit of clout on Twitter tbh. Hillary or Obama could drop one tweet attacking Mueller and MSNBC/CNN/etc would run with it for the whole year. Mueller is pushing all the right buttons so far to keep Libs/Dems happy.

:lmao

Spurtacular
02-20-2018, 08:18 PM
:lol impeach somebody not in government?

Read the Constitution.

Spurtacular
02-20-2018, 08:20 PM
Where did you get impeach thing from? Burned too many brain cells to come up with a coherent post or what?

:lol No one was talking about impeachment
:lol Hillary getting impeached because in your mind she's the president
:lol Derp's gonna derp

A triple :lol even though you're blatantly wrong. :lmao

One does not need to be president or even in office to be impeached from holding federal office. In fact, I'd argue the framers made it that way so we wouldn't have to put up with a criminal like Hillary running for office. But Dems were too far gone.

:lol Tranny's got to tranny

spurraider21
02-20-2018, 08:26 PM
Read the Constitution.
so you wanted hillary impeached while she was not in office?

Spurtacular
02-20-2018, 08:27 PM
so you wanted hillary impeached while she was not in office?

Of course. Why would I want a felon to run for office?

Mikeanaro
02-20-2018, 08:28 PM
A triple :lol even though you're blatantly wrong. :lmao

One does not need to be president or even in office to be impeached from holding federal office. In fact, I'd argue the framers made it that way so we wouldn't have to put up with a criminal like Hillary running for office. But Dems were too far gone.

:lol Tranny's got to tranny
Exactly, most people eating potato chips knows that, in all those movies when there is a trial and the judge says ¨do you remember you are under oath right? lying would be perjury¨

So now its only for presidents? only for liberals I guess

https://thegrio.com/2018/02/20/former-nyt-editor-claims-clarence-thomas-impeached-lying-oath/

Chris
02-20-2018, 08:37 PM
21 runnin' as fast as he can. :lol

spurraider21
02-20-2018, 08:38 PM
21 runnin' as fast as he can. :lol
not running at all. finding it hilarious that spurtacular wanted somebody who was not in office to be impeached

i didnt say its not permitted constitutionally. i just said its hilarious

clambake
02-20-2018, 08:58 PM
love this thread

tick
tock

Chris
02-20-2018, 08:59 PM
clambot spams the tick tock thingy again. :jack

clambake
02-20-2018, 09:03 PM
clambot spams the tick tock thingy again. :jack

stop letting it under your skin, dale

Chris
02-20-2018, 09:04 PM
Told you Mueller just wants to go home :lol


966106486446358530

Reck
02-20-2018, 09:23 PM
A triple :lol even though you're blatantly wrong. :lmao

One does not need to be president or even in office to be impeached from holding federal office. In fact, I'd argue the framers made it that way so we wouldn't have to put up with a criminal like Hillary running for office. But Dems were too far gone.

:lol Tranny's got to tranny

You're antiquated and a retard.

She wouldn't have been "impeached." Nobody would be using that word to ask for her resignation. No one was talking about impeachment before you falsely used that term like you always do.

Always using words in the wrong context or using 1800s words that are obsolete to come off as intelligent and always finding a way to make yourself look worse. :lol
:lol Potatoe
:lol Deauche

spurraider21
02-20-2018, 09:27 PM
Told you Mueller just wants to go home :lol


966106486446358530
:lol "potentially could've"

DMX7
02-20-2018, 09:35 PM
If this all unfolds the way it's shaping up to then I have to say I am so proud of Robert Mueller and so proud to be an American again. Mueller represents the best of our country and Trump represents the absolute worst.

I would vote Robert Mueller for POTUS if I could.

TSA
02-20-2018, 09:35 PM
965951888935018497

:lol Trump isn’t tied to any of this, but guess who is? *ding*

966121512825585664

Thread well sourced and worth the read. Mueller may be after something well different then we were lead to believe.

Reck
02-20-2018, 09:44 PM
:lol Trump isn’t tied to any of this, but guess who is? *ding*

966121512825585664

Thread well sourced and worth the read. Mueller may be after something well different then we were lead to believe.

BOOM.

You hit the trifecta.

Obama, Bill and Podesta are the ones about to get indicted.

Was dissapointed when I didn't see Hillary up in there. Giving the good old horse a break, TSA?


EDIT: All caught up now. Tweets #14 and #15 covered all the bases.

Pavlov
02-20-2018, 09:45 PM
966011740990386177

I would not. Let that sink in.

Chris
02-20-2018, 09:46 PM
Hilarious that they are pushing Manafort doing 80 years vs. giving up Trump (pee pee tape etc..)

Chris
02-20-2018, 09:46 PM
I would not. Let that sink in.

Hah! We will see...

Chris
02-20-2018, 09:53 PM
BOOM.

You hit the trifecta.

Obama, Bill and Podesta are the ones about to get indicted.

Was dissapointed when I didn't see Hillary up in there. Giving the good old horse a break, TSA?


EDIT: All caught up now. Tweets #14 and #15 covered all the bases.

Mueller is not the only one conducting investigations.

TSA
02-20-2018, 10:07 PM
BOOM.

You hit the trifecta.

Obama, Bill and Podesta are the ones about to get indicted.

Was dissapointed when I didn't see Hillary up in there. Giving the good old horse a break, TSA?


EDIT: All caught up now. Tweets #14 and #15 covered all the bases.

Now that you’re all caught up who is the most recent indictment connected to, Trump or the Clintons?

Chris
02-20-2018, 10:09 PM
Sneaky Feinstein

965948500830773249

http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/20/is-a-former-feinstein-staffer-running-fusion-gpss-post-election-russia-dossier-operation/

Chris
02-20-2018, 10:24 PM
CNN LITERALLY digging in the trash for news! :lmao


965745991633715200

Spurtacular
02-20-2018, 11:05 PM
You're antiquated and a retard.

She wouldn't have been "impeached." Nobody would be using that word to ask for her resignation. No one was talking about impeachment before you falsely used that term like you always do.

Always using words in the wrong context or using 1800s words that are obsolete to come off as intelligent and always finding a way to make yourself look worse. :lol
:lol Potatoe
:lol Deauche

You're ranting and raving like an unhinged tranny.

Antiquated? What are you talking about?

"She wouldn't have been 'impeached.'" -- What are you talking about?

"Nobody would be using that word to ask for her resignation." -- We weren't talking about resignations per say.

"No one was talking about impeachment before you falsely used that term like you always do." Yea, I said that nobody was saying it. What does that have to do with me? And :lol at you saying I'm falsely using impeachment. You clearly didn't bother to go read the Constitution on this.

:lol Trying to make hash out of old spelling sh** which doesn't even bother me other than I see no point in debating it for the umpteenth time.

Mikeanaro
02-20-2018, 11:16 PM
CNN LITERALLY digging in the trash for news! :lmao


965745991633715200
Real lame, ¨we are leaving¨ well then just leave you piece of shit.
No wonder ratings are so low.

hater
02-20-2018, 11:39 PM
If this all unfolds the way it's shaping up to then I have to say I am so proud of Robert Mueller and so proud to be an American again. Mueller represents the best of our country and Trump represents the absolute worst.

I would vote Robert Mueller for POTUS if I could.

:lmao wut

Mueller is Colin Powell 2.0 he will go in hiding after he either resigns or gets fired
:lol

hater
02-20-2018, 11:40 PM
CNN LITERALLY digging in the trash for news! :lmao


965745991633715200


:lmao omg

:lmao :lol

hater
02-20-2018, 11:49 PM
Cnn also tracking random grannies qnd accusing them of being in with the russians :lmao :lol

966157651624284160

Chris
02-20-2018, 11:54 PM
Cnn also tracking random grannies qnd accusing them of being in with the russians :lmao :lol

966157651624284160

The comments from that thread are great :lol Flowers By Irene :lol

DMX7
02-21-2018, 12:02 AM
Why is it that every new piece of evidence that comes out makes Trump look more guilty and not less? I think we know why.... :lol

I think pretty soon they'll be calling Robert Mueller "Big Shot Bob!"

hater
02-21-2018, 12:07 AM
Why is it that every new piece of evidence that comes out makes Trump look more guilty and not less? I think we know why.... :lol

I think pretty soon they'll be calling Robert Mueller "Big Shot Bob!"

There were idiots back then saying Powell would be next president as well

:lmao

hater
02-21-2018, 12:16 AM
:lmao

966179319214206976

Spurminator
02-21-2018, 12:16 AM
Reporting <> Promoting

Chris
02-21-2018, 12:18 AM
Why were Michael Moore and CNN promoting Russian funded protests?

Chris
02-21-2018, 12:20 AM
Where are the indictments for them? "Mueller?" "Mueller?" "Mueller?"

NP0mQeLWCCo

hater
02-21-2018, 12:26 AM
Reporting <> Promoting

Then why didnt CNN confront Michael Moore? He promotd it :lol

DMC
02-21-2018, 12:28 AM
Rent free, mothercfucker. Get some.

Shadowflameout

DMC
02-21-2018, 12:28 AM
running to the mountains.

what a patriot!

Better sniping positions in the high ground.

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 12:31 AM
966101080944898049

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 12:32 AM
The bot activity uptick in this thread is quite refreshing. Panic. Niggas shook.

Spurminator
02-21-2018, 12:36 AM
Then why didnt CNN confront Michael Moore? He promotd it :lol

I guess they prefer "harassing patriots."

Chris
02-21-2018, 12:40 AM
The bot activity uptick in this thread is quite refreshing. Panic. Niggas shook.

Why were Michael Moore and CNN promoting Russian funded protests?

hater
02-21-2018, 12:40 AM
I guess they prefer "harassing patriots."

Apparently :lol

DMX7
02-21-2018, 12:40 AM
There were idiots back then saying Powell would be next president as well

:lmao

Powell? What does he have to do with anything? He scared himself by going to the UN and doing Bush's bidding. Mueller is doing the opposite of that. I don't know if he ever would have been POTUS but that event ended it for him.

hater
02-21-2018, 12:42 AM
Why were Michael Moore and CNN promoting Russian funded protests?

He will probably not answer and instead post something like “mueller time!” Or “Anyminute now Trump will be charged with treason” :lmao

hater
02-21-2018, 12:43 AM
Powell? What does he have to do with anything? He scared himself by going to the UN and doing Bush's bidding. Mueller is doing the opposite of that. I don't know if he ever would have been POTUS but that event ended it for him.

Mueller is working for the same neocon globalists thqt Powell was working for

Chris
02-21-2018, 12:45 AM
He will probably not answer and instead post something like “mueller time!” Or “Anyminute now Trump will be charged with treason” :lmao

Just going to call everyone bots and suck on his thumb :lol

TSA
02-21-2018, 12:45 AM
Why is it that every new piece of evidence that comes out makes Trump look more guilty and not less? Because you’re a dipshit who takes MSM reporting at face value.

The newest indictment has zero to do with Trump. The newest indictment is closely linked to the Clintons, the Clinton Foundation, the Podesta Group, the White House counsel to Obama/assistant to the President and special counsel in the White House for Clinton (Craig), and the associate White House counsel to Clinton (Sloan). These were the people directly involved with Manafort and his work in Ukraine and what got him indicted. None of this had anything to with Trump.


I think pretty soon they'll be calling Robert Mueller "Big Shot Bob!"

They will, it just won’t be coming from your side.

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 12:48 AM
Why were Michael Moore and CNN promoting Russian funded protests?
Not sure what you think Michael Moore has anything to do with anything. Looks like you are malfunctioning.

TSA
02-21-2018, 12:51 AM
The bot activity uptick in this thread is quite refreshing. Panic. Niggas shook.

Based on the sheer volume of tweets you’ve posted in this thread I take it you’re one of those panicked and shook niggas I’ve heard about.

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 12:57 AM
Based on the sheer volume of tweets you’ve posted in this thread I take it you’re one of those panicked and shook niggas I’ve heard about.

Nope. I'm calm and enjoying the moment. Watching you dance around your "no indictments period" stance is a sight to behold.

TSA
02-21-2018, 01:10 AM
Nope. I'm calm and enjoying the moment. Watching you dance around your "no indictments period" stance is a sight to behold.Nope. You’re completely shook and it’s obvious. There has been nothing recently for you to enjoy. Everything you post backfires once dug in to.

Watching you refuse to comment on who the newest indictment connects to is a sight to behold.

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 01:14 AM
Nope. You’re completely shook and it’s obvious. There has been nothing recently for you to enjoy. Everything you post backfires once dug in to.

Watching you refuse to comment on who the newest indictment connects to is a sight to behold.

Susan Rice still walking around a free woman. Pizzagate dead. Yeah your predictions are rock solid.

TSA
02-21-2018, 01:17 AM
Susan Rice still walking around a free woman. Pizzagate dead. Yeah your predictions are rock solid.

Watching you refuse to comment on who the newest indictment connects to is a sight to behold.

Pavlov
02-21-2018, 04:39 AM
Watching you refuse to comment on who the newest indictment connects to is a sight to behold.You never answer any questions that are asked of you.

Why is that?

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 10:09 AM
Nunes on twitter literally asking for help from Russian bots. :lol

hater
02-21-2018, 10:32 AM
Word on d streets is Flynn considering flipping his guilty plea cause US FISA was illegal :lmao

700+ pages of pure hot air :lol

Flynn judge was removed because he is a FISA judge as well :lmao

“I learned over the weekend that he (Contreras) did not recuse himself. He was removed from the case. Now the question for any good reporter at the Washington Post - the alternative universe in DC - is ‘why was Judge Contreras removed from the case by either the Chief Judge or the DC Circuit?’ Have you seen a story written about that? Isn’t it interesting how people in the press are not interested why the one judge who has taken a guilty plea in this case was removed from the case?”

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 10:42 AM
Word on d streets is Flynn considering flipping his guilty plea cause US FISA was illegal :lmao

700+ pages of pure hot air :lol

Flynn judge was removed because he is a FISA judge as well :lmao

“I learned over the weekend that he (Contreras) did not recuse himself. He was removed from the case. Now the question for any good reporter at the Washington Post - the alternative universe in DC - is ‘why was Judge Contreras removed from the case by either the Chief Judge or the DC Circuit?’ Have you seen a story written about that? Isn’t it interesting how people in the press are not interested why the one judge who has taken a guilty plea in this case was removed from the case?”

966318247720181762

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 10:46 AM
966314306118868992
966315343005265922
966316096889475072
966316637908602880

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 10:50 AM
966317254710358016
966317576744787968
966318247720181762
966318727078862848
Poor hater

hater
02-21-2018, 10:58 AM
965789829576323072

965631008694390786

Poor shillarytards

clambake
02-21-2018, 11:05 AM
tick tock

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 11:16 AM
965789829576323072

965631008694390786

Poor shillarytards

Quick question. Why would Flynn want to take away his own deal?

TSA
02-21-2018, 11:45 AM
You never answer any questions that are asked of you.

Why is that?

I answer questions all the time. Why do you lie so much?

Since djohn pussed out and ran away I'll ask you. Is the most recent indictment connected to Trump or the Clintons?

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 11:47 AM
I answer questions all the time. Why do you lie so much?

Since djohn pussed out and ran away I'll ask you. Is the most recent indictment connected to Trump or the Clintons?
Yeah nobody gives a shit what you ask. You were wrong. You said no indictments period. You actually laughed at the thought of indictments.

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 11:48 AM
966351814135250944
:lmao :lmao :lmao

TSA
02-21-2018, 11:49 AM
That was one that struck me as well.

Don't lie to federal prosecutors. Dude is building his case bit by bit. The bottom layer of the pyramid is almost complete, and it seems the next layer is getting prepped.

Is the next layer you are referring to the Clintons?

966121512825585664

The newest indictment has zero to do with Trump. The newest indictment is closely linked to the Clintons, the Clinton Foundation, the Podesta Group, the White House counsel to Obama/assistant to the President and special counsel in the White House for Clinton (Craig), and the associate White House counsel to Clinton (Sloan). These were the people directly involved with Manafort and his work in Ukraine and what got him indicted. None of this had anything to with Trump.

TSA
02-21-2018, 11:53 AM
Yeah nobody gives a shit what you ask. You were wrong. You said no indictments period. You actually laughed at the thought of indictments.

You said the latest indictment had to do with Trump. You were wrong. The latest indictment has to do with the Clintons. You are too much of a puss to admit it and have to bring up things from a year ago in an attempt to deflect. On top of this deflection you are now trying to come up with a way that Flynn's charge getting dropped would be a bad thing :rollin

You are shook, this thread is toast.

TSA
02-21-2018, 11:53 AM
Yeah nobody gives a shit what you ask. You were wrong. You said no indictments period. You actually laughed at the thought of indictments.

You get one more chance pussy. Is the most recent indictment connected to Trump or the Clintons?

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 11:55 AM
966351814135250944
:lmao :lmao :lmao

If you say it I love it!

Blake
02-21-2018, 11:57 AM
I answer questions all the time.

:lol

Blake
02-21-2018, 11:57 AM
You get one more chance pussy.

Or else!

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 12:00 PM
966318608182779904
Head of an intel committee asking for Russian help. Just remember, this is who TSA and crew will defend through thick and thin.

TSA
02-21-2018, 12:07 PM
Or else!

Thanks for throwing your hat in the ring. Is the most recent indictment connected to Trump or the Clintons?

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 12:13 PM
Thanks for throwing your hat in the ring. Is the most recent indictment connected to Trump or the Clintons?

That "wrong about Pizzagate" line fits your name well. We have alot more to add to that.

TSA
02-21-2018, 12:13 PM
That "wrong about Pizzagate" line fits your name well. We have alot more to add to that.

Is the most recent indictment connected to Trump or the Clintons?

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 12:14 PM
Is the most recent indictment connected to Trump or the Clintons?

Trump.

Blake
02-21-2018, 12:18 PM
Thanks for throwing your hat in the ring. Is the most recent indictment connected to Trump or the Clintons?

I don't care

TSA
02-21-2018, 12:21 PM
I don't care

Why do you continue to post ITT?

TSA
02-21-2018, 12:23 PM
Trump.

What do the Clinton Foundation, the Podesta Group, the White House counsel to Obama/assistant to the President and special counsel in the White House for Clinton (Craig), and the associate White House counsel to Clinton (Sloan) have to do with Trump?

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 12:26 PM
966363198193586176
:lmao :lmao :lmao :rollin :lmao

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 12:32 PM
966364406744526849

Blake
02-21-2018, 12:46 PM
Why do you continue to post ITT?

To lol at your goalpost move

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 12:52 PM
966369435643727877

TSA
02-21-2018, 12:55 PM
To lol at your goalpost move

this entire thread is a goalpost move. Trump colluded with Russia is DOA

TSA
02-21-2018, 12:56 PM
966369435643727877

:lol recycling year old news in an attempt to keep your thread alive

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 01:00 PM
:lol recycling year old news in an attempt to keep your thread alive

More charges just filed on Manafort. :lmao peeSA

hater
02-21-2018, 01:03 PM
:lol recycling year old news in an attempt to keep your thread alive

:lol poor guy

Not having a full time job probably makes you do stupid shit like that

boutons_deux
02-21-2018, 01:07 PM
JARED KUSHNER-QATAR REDUX: ROBERT MUELLER ENTERS THE FRAY (https://theintercept.com/2018/02/21/jared-kushner-mueller-qatar/)

SPECIAL COUNSEL ROBERT Mueller is probing senior White House aide Jared Kushner’s attempts to secure financing for a distressed Manhattan property after the 2016 election,

including pitches made to investment firms from China and Qatar, several news outlets reported (https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/19/politics/mueller-investigation-kushner-foreign-financing-efforts/index.html) this week.

The attempt by Jared Kushner’s father Charles to secure funding from Qatar before and after Donald Trump’s election — up until the spring of 2017 — was first reported in July by The Intercept (https://theintercept.com/2017/07/10/jared-kushner-tried-and-failed-to-get-a-half-billion-dollar-bailout-from-qatar/) and later confirmed publicly by a Kushner Companies spokesperson.

The property that is now tied up in Mueller’s probe, as well as linked to a diplomatic crisis in the Middle East, sits at 666 Fifth Ave., and

was bought by Kushner at the height of the housing bubble for what was even then considered an inflated price of $1.8 billion.

The building is now severely underwater and

if Kushner can’t find refinancing sometime in 2018,

the property risks blowing a hole in the family balance sheet.

Kushner has worked doggedly to fend off that reckoning, talking with prospective investors around the globe.

https://theintercept.com/2018/02/21/jared-kushner-mueller-qatar/

Mueller's investigation of Kushner companies has to be scaring away big investors, many being corrupt money launderers, who don't want Mueller investigating them.

666 5th Avenue? :lol What do you Bible-humping Satan-paranoid evangelicals have to say about 666?

TSA
02-21-2018, 01:08 PM
this entire thread is a goalpost move. Trump colluded with Russia is DOA

On the other hand....

966352829509263360

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 01:09 PM
On the other hand....

966352829509263360

The same guy asking for help from russian bots :lol

How did the memo go?

Reck
02-21-2018, 01:13 PM
On the other hand....

966352829509263360

Of course Nunes would say this.

How many busts does he have to his name by now? What's sadder is that you keep being a loyal follower even through all his nothingburgers.

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 01:14 PM
Of course Nunes would say this.

How many busts does he have to his name by now? What's sadder is that you keep being a loyal follower even through all his nothingnurgers.

He's a loser just like Nunes.

TSA
02-21-2018, 01:15 PM
The same guy asking for help from russian bots :lol

How did the memo go?

So shook you miss the sarcasm. Memo went as planned, and the Grassley/Graham memo corroborated Nunes memo---The FBI relied heavily on the Clinton paid for Steele dossier to obtain a FISA warrant. These guys are just getting started.

TSA
02-21-2018, 01:17 PM
Of course Nunes would say this.

How many busts does he have to his name by now? What's sadder is that you keep being a loyal follower even through all his nothingburgers.

The only guy serving up nothingburgers at this point is your boy Adam Schiff.

boutons_deux
02-21-2018, 01:19 PM
Trash-fellator, not-very-smart Nunes is a Repug, so he is LYING

And he won't present evidence.

Trash takes his queue from Nunes and bitches at befuddled, poor little racist Sessions to sic DoJ on Trash's political enemy(ies), just like in dictatorships.

spurraider21
02-21-2018, 01:21 PM
So shook you miss the sarcasm. Memo went as planned, and the Grassley/Graham memo corroborated Nunes memo---The FBI relied heavily on the Clinton paid for Steele dossier to obtain a FISA warrant. These guys are just getting started.
then how come the guy who read the actual application said that the memo in no way undermined the mueller investigation? why do you think sundance knows more than gowdy?

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 01:21 PM
So shook you miss the sarcasm. Memo went as planned, and the Grassley/Graham memo corroborated Nunes memo---The FBI relied heavily on the Clinton paid for Steele dossier to obtain a FISA warrant. These guys are just getting started.

Memo went as planned by being a giant flop? :lmao

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 01:22 PM
966101080944898049

966374953544241152
:lol that was quick

TSA
02-21-2018, 01:31 PM
then how come the guy who read the actual application said that the memo in no way undermined the mueller investigation? why do you think sundance knows more than gowdy?

It was never meant to undermine the Mueller investigation where did you come up with that?

boutons_deux
02-21-2018, 01:32 PM
Trump challenges Sessions to investigate Obama, Democrats on Russiahttps://www.cnn.com/2018/02/21/politics/donald-trump-jeff-sessions-obama-russia/index.html

Neither one of these two racists assholes are very smart, thinking Fox/Breitbart and all you shit kicking tribalists are going to deflect Mueller.

TSA
02-21-2018, 01:33 PM
Memo went as planned by being a giant flop? :lmao

Speaking of flops what happened to Schiff's memo?

Reck
02-21-2018, 01:35 PM
966374953544241152
:lol that was quick

Doesn't this make the first Trumper publicly saying they flat out lie?

I've not seeing an ex Trump employee ever be this clear about them lying.

Pavlov
02-21-2018, 01:44 PM
I answer questions all the time. Why do you lie so much?

Since djohn pussed out and ran away I'll ask you. Is the most recent indictment connected to Trump or the Clintons?It's connected to Gates, so the answer is Trump.

That was easy.

Is Nunes connected to Trump or the Clintons?

Pavlov
02-21-2018, 01:45 PM
It was never meant to undermine the Mueller investigation where did you come up with that?:rollin

TSA
02-21-2018, 01:45 PM
966374953544241152
:lol that was quick



"Former senior campaign consultant Sam Nunberg, who was fired from the Trump campaign last year, is accused of leaking confidential information to reporters."

"Trump's campaign fired Nunberg last August for making racially insensitive comments on Facebook. Nunberg had reportedly written offensive social media posts in 2007 and 2008, which included a racial slur against Rev. Al Sharpton's daughter and offensive comments toward President Obama."

"Nunberg admitted last year that he had made up a viral story about then-New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) being sent to pick up McDonald’s for then-candidate Trump to embarrass then-candidate Trump."

TSA
02-21-2018, 01:47 PM
It's connected to Gates, so the answer is Trump.

That was easy.

Is Nunes connected to Trump or the Clintons?

Hey at least you tried, but you're wrong. When the crimes were committed it had nothing to do with Trump. The correct answer is the most recent indictment is connected to the Clintons, and it isn't a loose connection either. They are directly involved.

tick

tock

clambake
02-21-2018, 01:52 PM
thats right


tick tock

Pavlov
02-21-2018, 01:52 PM
Hey at least you tried, but you're wrong. When the crimes were committed it had nothing to do with Trump. The correct answer is the most recent indictment is connected to the Clintons, and it isn't a loose connection either. They are directly involved.Show me where in van der Zwaan's indictment/plea deal it says that.

Thanks in advance.

Is Nunes connected to Trump or the Clintons?

Reck
02-21-2018, 02:00 PM
Hey at least you tried, but you're wrong. When the crimes were committed it had nothing to do with Trump. The correct answer is the most recent indictment is connected to the Clintons, and it isn't a loose connection either. They are directly involved.

tick

tock

That's nuts. :lol

At least prove it with actual evidence that's laid out in the indictments, not from some random tweeter guy.

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 02:02 PM
Speaking of flops what happened to Schiff's memo?
Pivoted from that big ass nothingburger known as Nunesmemo. Guess #Releasethememo was a big Nunes fail.

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 02:02 PM
Doesn't this make the first Trumper publicly saying they flat out lie?

I've not seeing an ex Trump employee ever be this clear about them lying.

Pretty much.

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 02:03 PM
Show me where in van der Zwaan's indictment/plea deal it says that.

Thanks in advance.

Is Nunes connected to Trump or the Clintons?

:lol

RandomGuy
02-21-2018, 02:03 PM
The only guy serving up nothingburgers at this point is your boy Adam Schiff.

You're right. Nunes isn't serving up nothingburgers. It was really another food item.

https://pics.onsizzle.com/nothing-belongs-on-pizza-3288433.png

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 02:05 PM
You're right. Nunes isn't serving up nothingburgers. It was really another food item.

https://pics.onsizzle.com/nothing-belongs-on-pizza-3288433.png

:lmao

Pavlov
02-21-2018, 02:11 PM
Is the next layer you are referring to the Clintons?

966121512825585664

The newest indictment has zero to do with Trump. The newest indictment is closely linked to the Clintons, the Clinton Foundation, the Podesta Group, the White House counsel to Obama/assistant to the President and special counsel in the White House for Clinton (Craig), and the associate White House counsel to Clinton (Sloan). These were the people directly involved with Manafort and his work in Ukraine and what got him indicted. None of this had anything to with Trump.:lol Fake named twitter account started three days ago.

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 02:13 PM
:lol Fake named twitter account started three days ago.

:lmao

TSA
02-21-2018, 02:15 PM
Show me where in van der Zwaan's indictment/plea deal it says that.

Thanks in advance.

Is Nunes connected to Trump or the Clintons?He lied about his work with Skadden Arps

indictment>>>van der Zwaan>>>Skadden Arps>>>Greg Craig (white house counsel to Obama/assistant to the President Clinton and special counsel in the White House)/Clifford Sloan (associate White House Counsel to President Clinton)>>>Yanukovych>>>Victor Pinchuk 8.6 million>>>Clinton Foundation

TSA
02-21-2018, 02:16 PM
That's nuts. :lol

At least prove it with actual evidence that's laid out in the indictments, not from some random tweeter guy.

That random tweeter guy provided source links in the thread...you claimed to have read the whole thing last night.

DarrinS
02-21-2018, 02:16 PM
CNN now harassing and doxxing senior citizens

because Russia


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5SQWtFqcwQ

Pavlov
02-21-2018, 02:16 PM
He lied about his work with Skadden Arps

indictment>>>van der Zwaan>>>Skadden Arps>>>Greg Craig (white house counsel to Obama/assistant to the President Clinton and special counsel in the White House)/Clifford Sloan (associate White House Counsel to President Clinton)>>>Yanukovych>>>Victor Pinchuk 8.6 million>>>Clinton FoundationShow me where in van der Zwaan's indictment/plea deal it says that the charges have to do with the Clintons.

Thanks in advance.

Is Nunes connected to Trump or the Clintons?

TSA
02-21-2018, 02:18 PM
:lol Fake named twitter account started three days ago.

It's the same guy on twitter who went by Imperator Rex. Believe his old account was banned. Why would using a real name matter Pavlov?

DarrinS
02-21-2018, 02:18 PM
It's the same guy on twitter who went by Imperator Rex. Believe his old account was banned. Why would using a real name matter Pavlov?

:lol

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 02:19 PM
It's the same guy on twitter who went by Imperator Rex. Believe his old account was banned. Why would using a real name matter Pavlov?
Well they were banned for a reason. Dumbass :lol

Pavlov
02-21-2018, 02:20 PM
CNN now harassing and doxxing senior citizens

because Russia


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5SQWtFqcwQDarrin is outraged!

lol old lady even *dings* during the interview. Just like Darrin.

Pavlov
02-21-2018, 02:21 PM
It's the same guy on twitter who went by Imperator Rex. Believe his old account was banned. Why would using a real name matter Pavlov?Why would this guy use a fake name twice?

What does he have to hide?

And why did his other fake named account get banned?

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 02:22 PM
966372876617052160
lol TSA heroes

spurraider21
02-21-2018, 02:23 PM
CNN now harassing and doxxing senior citizens

because Russia


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5SQWtFqcwQ
lol harassing and doxxing. she agreed to do an interview :lmao

and she didn't really refute what he was saying... except when she went off the rails and starting saying BS, BS, BS it was hillary who colluded with russians, etc

boutons_deux
02-21-2018, 02:24 PM
https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/styles/article_small/public/thumbnails/image/2017/11/02/11/laura-loomer.gif

TSA
02-21-2018, 02:24 PM
Show me where in van der Zwaan's indictment/plea deal it says that the charges have to do with the Clintons.

Thanks in advance.

Is Nunes connected to Trump or the Clintons?

I never claimed the indictment said the charges have to do with the Clintons, but you were just shown how the charges are connected to the Clintons.

Can you show me in the Gates indictment where it says the charges have to do with Trump?

TSA
02-21-2018, 02:26 PM
Why would this guy use a fake name twice?

What does he have to hide?

And why did his other fake named account get banned?

I don't know why he'd use a fake name twice. I don't know what he has to hide. I don't know why he got banned.

Why have you used a fake name twice? What do you have to hide?

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 02:26 PM
I never claimed the indictment said the charges have to do with the Clintons, but you were just shown how the charges are connected to the Clintons.




:lmao det backpedal.

TSA
02-21-2018, 02:27 PM
:lmao det backpedal.

:lmao det reading comprehension

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 02:28 PM
:lmao det reading comprehension

I see just like the memo, you no longer want to talk about how it relates to the Clintons. That was easy.

Pavlov
02-21-2018, 02:31 PM
I never claimed the indictment said the charges have to do with the Clintons, but you were just shown how the charges are connected to the Clintons.So fake named banned twitter guy is your only source.

lol


Can you show me in the Gates indictment where it says the charges have to do with Trump?

Yeah, he lied about his communications with Gates, who was working for the Trump campaign at the time. So this van der Zwaan is linked to Trump in the court documents. QED.

That was easy.

Is Nunes connected to Trump or to the Clintons?

TSA
02-21-2018, 02:31 PM
I see just like the memo, you no longer want to talk about how it relates to the Clintons. That was easy.

You're the only who's run from discussing the connections of the van der Zwaan indictment to the Clintons. Do you need me to quote all of the times you've run away in the last 24 hours?

indictment>>>van der Zwaan>>>Skadden Arps>>>Greg Craig (white house counsel to Obama/assistant to the President Clinton and special counsel in the White House)/Clifford Sloan (associate White House Counsel to President Clinton)>>>Yanukovych>>>Victor Pinchuk 8.6 million>>>Clinton Foundation

Pavlov
02-21-2018, 02:35 PM
You're the only who's run from discussing the connections of the van der Zwaan indictment to the Clintons. Do you need me to quote all of the times you've run away in the last 24 hours?

indictment>>>van der Zwaan>>>Skadden Arps>>>Greg Craig (white house counsel to Obama/assistant to the President Clinton and special counsel in the White House)/Clifford Sloan (associate White House Counsel to President Clinton)>>>Yanukovych>>>Victor Pinchuk 8.6 million>>>Clinton Foundation
https://thumbs.gfycat.com/PlaintiveImmediateAmericanmarten-max-1mb.gif

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 02:35 PM
TSA testy today. Like he knows the jig is up...

djohn2oo8
02-21-2018, 02:36 PM
https://thumbs.gfycat.com/PlaintiveImmediateAmericanmarten-max-1mb.gif

:lol

spurraider21
02-21-2018, 02:36 PM
furiously refreshing sundance tbh

Blake
02-21-2018, 02:37 PM
You're the only who's run from discussing the connections of the van der Zwaan indictment to the Clintons. Do you need me to quote all of the times you've run away in the last 24 hours?

indictment>>>van der Zwaan>>>Skadden Arps>>>Greg Craig (white house counsel to Obama/assistant to the President Clinton and special counsel in the White House)/Clifford Sloan (associate White House Counsel to President Clinton)>>>Yanukovych>>>Victor Pinchuk 8.6 million>>>Clinton Foundation

Lol that large amount of conspiracy >>> is awesome

TSA
02-21-2018, 02:38 PM
So fake named banned twitter guy is your only source.

lol You can read the twitter thread that has credible news links to every connection. He put it all together but the connections have been reported on for years.



[qutoe=Pavlov]Yeah, he lied about his communications with Gates, who was working for the Trump campaign at the time.

That was easy.

Is Nunes connected to Trump or to the Clintons?[/QUOTE]

He lied about his communications with Gates and his work with Skadden Arps, not connected to Trump.

why do you keep asking about Nunes connected to Trump or the Clintons?

Chris
02-21-2018, 02:39 PM
It's the same guy on twitter who went by Imperator Rex. Believe his old account was banned. Why would using a real name matter Pavlov?

:lmao

Reck
02-21-2018, 02:39 PM
That random tweeter guy provided source links in the thread...you claimed to have read the whole thing last night.

I read enough of the thread.

But my point remains, let's work from a place where we can all gather information already confirmed via the indictments that have been handed down.

Manafort, Rick and by extension this new Swaan guy are all connected to Trump. The indictments does not point to or hints at a possible Clinton connection in the least.

Chris
02-21-2018, 02:40 PM
966372876617052160
lol TSA heroes

lmao @ alt-right leaders. You love that fake news.

clambake
02-21-2018, 02:41 PM
I read enough of the thread.

But my point remains, let's work from a place where we can all gather information already confirmed via the indictments that have been handed down.

Manafort, Rick and by extension this new Swaan guy are all connected to Trump. The indictments does not point to or hints at a possible Clinton connection in the least.
indictments? you're dreaming if you think there's gonna be any indictments.

Pavlov
02-21-2018, 02:42 PM
You can read the twitter thread that has credible news links to every connection. He put it all together but the connections have been reported on for years.Which led to all the lengthy prison sentences for all the people you said were going to jail over the years.




He lied about his communications with Gates and his work with Skadden Arps, not connected to Trump.Gates is connected to Trump. Why lie about that?


why do you keep asking about Nunes connected to Trump or the Clintons?Because you don't answer.

It's a simple question.

Is Nunes connected to Trump or to the Clintons?

boutons_deux
02-21-2018, 02:43 PM
Why The Trump/Russia ‘Skeptics’ Are Wrong

https://dawm7kda6y2v0.cloudfront.net/uploads/2018/02/[email protected]


the key thing. That is this:

For the second half of 2016 Donald Trump himself and his campaign knew that Russia was engaged in a wide ranging effort to subvert the 2016 campaign and to work to get him elected.

Yet despite this knowledge

he and his campaign continued to approve numerous contacts with Russian government officials, clandestine meetings, receive offers of assistance.

He also continued to push a decidedly Russia friendly policy agenda,

even to the point of

threatening to short-circuit or abandon the NATO alliance

– probably Russia’s principal foreign policy goal not only today but decades back into the Cold War.

They continued to authorize all of this, continued to feel out the possible dimensions of the relationship and, critically, made no effort to contact the FBI

or other relevant federal agencies about a plot they knew these agencies were tracking and trying to combat.



Now, key question: How do I know they knew this?

First, they knew because the Russians told them. Explicitly told them.

Second, they knew what all of us knew.

Remember: from late July through November there was a constant stream of reportage detailing Russian efforts.

At the time that was mainly tied to the theft and distribution of emails.

But the Russian use of social media bots and sock puppets as well as Russian-state owned English language media were apparent too.

A lot was public in the fall of 2016.

But the critical thing is this:

starting in August,

Donald Trump personally, as well as various high-ranking members of his team were briefed on the Russian interference effort by US intelligence and law enforcement officials.

"We know this, Mr. Trump and we want to make sure you know."

If hearing it from the Russians themselves wasn’t enough,

if seeing the numerous press reports wasn’t enough,

the US government’s intelligence leaders telling him certainly should have been. Repeatedly.

Notably, they likely included a number of key details we in the public only learned as much as a year later.

He knew. He 100% knew.

And yet they continued on with the contacts and clandestine discussions and public policy promises right up to election day and intensified them during the transition.

Not once, as far as we know, did anyone associated with the Trump campaign or Trump himself speak to anyone from law enforcement or the intelligence community and

say, “Hey, you told us about that interference campaign. This one guy contacted us and we had a few conversations with him. Just wanted you to know.”

Not once.

Of course, Trump or Jared Kushner or Paul Manafort or Don Jr might have said,

“Hey, now that you mention it, we actually took this meeting in Trump Tower in June. And someone said it was the Russian government itself trying to give us dirt. We just wanted you to know.”



Not once. None of that happened.

To me this shows a clear consciousness of guilt and

more specifically a desire to participate – ‘collaborate’ is probably the better word – in the Russian operation

out of the view of the US government which was trying to prevent it.

Note here that I haven’t even gotten into the after the fact obstruction, calling in the the Russia Foreign Minister and sharing the most closely held US intelligence secrets or the continued refusal to impose sanctions mandated overwhelmingly by Congress.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/why-the-trump-russia-skeptics-are-wrong?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+%28TPMNews%29

Remember, Jared wanted to set up crypto-secret channel to Pootin, beyond the reach of FBI/NSA/CIA.

I bet Jared gave his demographic data to Mercer's Cambridge Analytics who gave it to Pootin's cyber army for targeting swing areas.

TSA
02-21-2018, 02:45 PM
Which led to all the lengthy prison sentences for all the people you said were going to jail over the years.



Gates is connected to Trump. Why lie about that?What Gates was actually indicted for isn't connected to Trump it's connected to the Clintons. Why lie about that?


Because you don't answer.

It's a simple question.

Is Nunes connected to Trump or to the Clintons?Trump. What's your point?

Pavlov
02-21-2018, 02:47 PM
What Gates was actually indicted for isn't connected to Trump it's connected to the Clintons. Why lie about that?Except it's not. I know why you lie about that. You have to make it about the Clintons.


Trump. What's your point?That is the point.

Thanks for finally answering, pussy.

TSA
02-21-2018, 02:51 PM
I read enough of the thread.

But my point remains, let's work from a place where we can all gather information already confirmed via the indictments that have been handed down.

Manafort, Rick and by extension this new Swaan guy are all connected to Trump. The indictments does not point to or hints at a possible Clinton connection in the least.

The only connection Manafort and Gates have to Trump is working for his campaign. The actual indictments have nothing to do with their time on the Trump campaign and are about work done in Ukraine. The white house counsel to Obama/assistant to the President Clinton and special counsel in the White House both worked at Skadden Arps, who worked with Manafort.

Pavlov
02-21-2018, 02:52 PM
The only connection Manafort and Gates have to Trump is working for his campaign. The actual indictments have nothing to do with their time on the Trump campaign and are about work done in Ukraine. The white house counsel to Obama/assistant to the President Clinton and special counsel in the White House both worked at Skadden Arps, who worked with Manafort.Why did Trump hire Manafort, TSA?

TSA
02-21-2018, 02:54 PM
Except it's not. I know why you lie about that. You have to make it about the Clintons.


Can you show me in the Gates indictment where it says the charges have to do with Trump?

Also...

Why have you used a fake name twice? What do you have to hide?

TSA
02-21-2018, 02:55 PM
Why did Trump hire Manafort, TSA?

I don't know. How would I possibly know that answer to that?

boutons_deux
02-21-2018, 02:57 PM
"The only connection Manafort and Gates have to Trump is working for his campaign."

... and they had been connected directly or indirectly to Russia, and very probably Manafort/Gates knew Trash was connected, and vice versa.

Pavlov
02-21-2018, 02:59 PM
Can you show me in the Gates indictment where it says the charges have to do with Trump?The part with the name Richard W. Gates III.


Also...

Why have you used a fake name twice? What do you have to hide?I'm not attempting to be the primary fake name twitter source for the Clintongate du jour. I discount anonymous twitter accounts on both sides tbh.


I don't know. How would I possibly know that answer to that?Certainly someone with fake name tweeter account level knowledge would know how Clintoned up Manafort and Gates apparently were.

Why hire guys like that?

Chucho
02-21-2018, 03:07 PM
Why did Trump hire Manafort, TSA?

To win the election. Manafort did what he was hired to do. He's a piece of shit, but he did what he was hired to do.

TSA
02-21-2018, 03:12 PM
The part with the name Richard W. Gates III.That doesn’t show the charges have anything to do with Trump. Show me in the Gates indictment where it says the charges have to do with Trump.

TSA
02-21-2018, 03:15 PM
"The only connection Manafort and Gates have to Trump is working for his campaign."

... and they had been connected directly or indirectly to Russia, and very probably Manafort/Gates knew Trash was connected, and vice versa.




They are connected to Russia the same way Greg Craig (white house counsel to Obama/assistant to the President Clinton and special counsel in the White House)/Clifford Sloan (associate White House Counsel to President were connected to Russia. Who was President and Secretary of State when these connections took place?

TSA
02-21-2018, 03:16 PM
Big Shot Bob’s got the left completely shook with the latest indictment. He’s slowly exposing the layers.

TSA
02-21-2018, 03:23 PM
Meanwhile 8 top ranking agents of the DOJ/FBI have been demoted or resigned due to evidence uncovered in the OIG investigation and talks of Trump/Russia collusion are dead.

hater
02-21-2018, 03:25 PM
:lmao democraps and repugs debating as to who has the less corrupt politicians :lmao

Shithole country :lol