Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[boutons_deux]

what report, we've seen bupkis?

good to know Republicans now think official conduct is beyond reproach so long as it is not provably illegal.

Barr actually thinks the Unitary President is beyond the reach of the law.

[TSA]

drip drip drip

1111307392438943744

[spurraider21]

Legitimately surprised he said coordinated and not colluded

[TSA]

drip drip drip

1111324960063139840

[Chris]

: )

[TSA]

Adam Schiff - a true patriot - smacking down the traitors in his committee -
listen to his words - he is going to tell you the EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION -
so you can hear it and see it with your own eyes! Yet traitors will still refuse to believe these FACTS!!!!

:lmao:lmao look at traitor NUNES' face!



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qIyhuTQ9Y4

1111304369146904576

“knowingly spreading false information”

He’s literally shitting himself right now

[Pavlov]

TSA's getting all worked up again.

:lol "literally"

[TSA]

Prominent Democratic lawyer Greg Craig close to being charged in case stemming from Mueller probe

(CNN) Federal prosecutors are close to bringing charges against Greg Craig, a prominent Democratic lawyer and former White House counsel in the Obama administration, in a case that originated with special counsel Robert Mueller, according to people familiar with the matter.

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/03/28/politics/greg-craig/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F

[Spurs Homer]

1111304369146904576

“Devin Nunes-knowingly spreading false information”

He’s literally shitting himself right now

fify

gop projecting

EXACTLY

the crimes they commit onto anyone who exposes corruption

lolololol

[Chris]

Greg Craig? That's a new one.

[TSA]

drip drip drip

1111324960063139840

1111312125459345408

Lying under oath...tisk tisk Nellie.

[TSA]

boom!

:hungry::hungry:

:lol post election collusion BOOM

1111358629003870208

[TSA]

1111304369146904576

“knowingly spreading false information”

He’s literally shitting himself right now

1111310208486252545

I can smell the Schitt from here.

[spurraider21]

:lol post election collusion BOOM

1111358629003870208
it would go towards intent/motive. cozying up with russia after conpsiring with them to help get elected. it would be consistent, in theory

[TSA]

it would go towards attempt. cozying up with russia after conpsiring with them to help get elected. it would be consistent, in theory

Mueller shit all over that theory. Why are you still bringing up debunked hypotheticals?

[spurraider21]

Mueller shit all over that theory. Why are you still bringing up debunked hypotheticals?
i said "in theory"

we haven't read a word of mueller's report yet. just reign it in a bit, especially for somebody continuing to brink up the debunked hillary email conspiracy theory

[ElNono]

I don't see why Schiff would have the resign over expressing his opinion about the prez, tbh...

It's not like the Dems asked the GOP to resign once the House concluded Shillary committed no crimes, despite the outright animosity displayed towards her...

I can see this having more traction if the GOP didn't lose the House in the midterms, but now in the minority?

[TSA]

i said "in theory"

we haven't read a word of mueller's report yet. just reign it in a bit, especially for somebody continuing to brink up the debunked hillary email conspiracy theory

You read Mueller’s exact words on Russian collusion. It didn’t happen.

If you want to deflect to Hillary be my guest and bump the appropriate thread, not sure how you claim that is debunked when it’s still being investigated.

[TSA]

I don't see why Schiff would have the resign over expressing his opinion about the prez, tbh...

It's not like the Dems asked the GOP to resign once the House concluded Shillary committed no crimes, despite the outright animosity displayed towards her...

I can see this having more traction if the GOP didn't lose the House in the midterms, but now in the minority?

Schiff wasn’t expressing his opinion, he was knowingly peddling false information.

[Pavlov]

You read Mueller’s exact words on Russian collusion. It didn’t happen.

If you want to deflect to Hillary be my guest and bump the appropriate thread, not sure how you claim that is debunked when it’s still being investigated.:lmao now you're playing forum cop after two years?

[ElNono]

Schiff wasn’t expressing his opinion, he was knowingly peddling false information.

Except he didn't cite any sources, the letter says that clearly on the very first paragraph.

And even if he did have access to some information, as long as he didn't break any confidentiality rules, it's still protected speech.

Heck, the POTUS lies incessantly (and far from being the first one), and picks and chooses the MSM media he talks to, should he resign too? What's the bar here?

Sure, I would rather take the non-lying, honest politician, they just don't seem to exist.

[TSA]

Except he didn't cite any sources, the letter says that clearly on the very first paragraph.

And even if he did have access to some information, as long as he didn't break any confidentiality rules, it's still protected speech.

Heck, the POTUS lies incessantly (and far from being the first one), and picks and chooses the MSM media he talks to, should he resign too? What's the bar here?

Sure, I would rather take the non-lying, honest politician, they just don't seem to exist.

If Schiff wasn’t knowingly spreading false information than he should have nothing to fear from an investigation. That’s how it works right?

[ElNono]

If Schiff wasn’t knowingly spreading false information than he should have nothing to fear from an investigation. That’s how it works right?

Absolutely. I was arguing about the rationale for him resigning.

Plus, the House GOP is well versed in trying to score political points with worthless investigations. Let them go at it.

[TSA]

Absolutely. I was arguing about the rationale for him resigning.

Plus, the House GOP is well versed in trying to score political points with worthless investigations. Let them go at it.

I predict Schiff will resign or be indicted.

[spurraider21]

I predict Schiff will resign or be indicted.
what would he be indicted for?

[Pavlov]

I predict Schiff will resign or be indicted.File that with your Hillary, Rice and martial law/mass Dem arrests predictions.

[TSA]

what would he be indicted for?

Leaking classified information to the press.

[TSA]

1110626419414106113

The outcome is no surprise to those who scrutinized the facts as they emerged. Time and again, the available evidence undermined the case for such a conspiracy. None of the characters presented to us as Russian “agents” or Trump-Kremlin “intermediaries” were shown to be anything of the sort. None of the lies that Trump aides or allies were caught telling pointed us toward the collusion that members of the media and political figures insisted they were hiding. None of the various pillars of Russiagate—the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting; the fanciful assertions of the Steele dossier; the anonymously sourced media claims, such as Trump campaign members’ having “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials”—ever led us to damning evidence. And all of that is likely why Mueller never charged anyone with involvement in (or covering up) a Trump-Russia conspiracy.

A minimally responsible media and political class would have acknowledged this reality. Instead, leading voices from cable news, Congress, and other influential perches promoted Russiagate by ignoring the countervailing evidence and those who pointed it out. They filled in the evidentiary holes with supposition, innuendo, and outright falsehood. That helps to explain the sizable number of discredited or retracted media reports that advanced the notion of a Trump-Russia plot, culminating in the final collapse of that narrative.

[TSA]

1110626419414106113

The outcome is no surprise to those who scrutinized the facts as they emerged. Time and again, the available evidence undermined the case for such a conspiracy. None of the characters presented to us as Russian “agents” or Trump-Kremlin “intermediaries” were shown to be anything of the sort. None of the lies that Trump aides or allies were caught telling pointed us toward the collusion that members of the media and political figures insisted they were hiding. None of the various pillars of Russiagate—the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting; the fanciful assertions of the Steele dossier; the anonymously sourced media claims, such as Trump campaign members’ having “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials”—ever led us to damning evidence. And all of that is likely why Mueller never charged anyone with involvement in (or covering up) a Trump-Russia conspiracy.

A minimally responsible media and political class would have acknowledged this reality. Instead, leading voices from cable news, Congress, and other influential perches promoted Russiagate by ignoring the countervailing evidence and those who pointed it out. They filled in the evidentiary holes with supposition, innuendo, and outright falsehood. That helps to explain the sizable number of discredited or retracted media reports that advanced the notion of a Trump-Russia plot, culminating in the final collapse of that narrative.

RIP djohn2oo8

[spurraider21]

yes, lol cable news and pundits. and twitter experts.

stick to print news from the big boys and you can avoid a lot of hysteria.

[Spurs Homer]

Leaking classified information to the press.

bring it
investigate him

release everything

when the smoke clears
only the traitors will be exposed

every fucking thing that shiff said to warn the country about trumps fuckery
was based on already known public info

in other words

everything that anyone could see with their own eyes

unless you are a blind cultist

[koriwhat]

bring it
investigate him

release everything

when the smoke clears
only the traitors will be exposed

every fucking thing that shiff said to warn the country about trumps fuckery
was based on already known public info

in other words

everything that anyone could see with their own eyes

unless you are a blind cultist

closed door sessions leaked... yeah that info was just public!

every day you make a case for your lack of brains.

[Spurs Homer]

1110626419414106113

The outcome is no surprise to those who scrutinized the facts as they emerged. Time and again, the available evidence undermined the case for such a conspiracy. None of the characters presented to us as Russian “agents” or Trump-Kremlin “intermediaries” were shown to be anything of the sort. None of the lies that Trump aides or allies were caught telling pointed us toward the collusion that members of the media and political figures insisted they were hiding. None of the various pillars of Russiagate—the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting; the fanciful assertions of the Steele dossier; the anonymously sourced media claims, such as Trump campaign members’ having “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials”—ever led us to damning evidence. And all of that is likely why Mueller never charged anyone with involvement in (or covering up) a Trump-Russia conspiracy.

A minimally responsible media and political class would have acknowledged this reality. Instead, leading voices from cable news, Congress, and other influential perches promoted Russiagate by ignoring the countervailing evidence and those who pointed it out. They filled in the evidentiary holes with supposition, innuendo, and outright falsehood. That helps to explain the sizable number of discredited or retracted media reports that advanced the notion of a Trump-Russia plot, culminating in the final collapse of that narrative.

Great.

So release the Mueller report - all 100% of it.

Fuck classified, fuck grand jury, fuck fisa, fuck executive privilege - since it didn't matter when it was a HRC investigation =

RELEASE THE MUELLER REPORT -

or all that garbage is meaningless.

Except -

The right is doing everything possible to BURY IT.

Why?

[Spurs Homer]

closed door sessions leaked... yeah that info was just public!

every day you make a case for your lack of brains.

Post every thing that he leaked that was improper?

Go ahead.

I'll shoot down all your "theories"

[koriwhat]

Post every thing that he leaked that was improper?

Go ahead.

I'll shoot down all your "theories"

they aren't theories and that's what you're missing besides your brain of course.

[TSA]

every fucking thing that shiff said to warn the country about trumps fuckery
was based on already known public info


8Dzw6CIvKbw

:lmao this is too easy

[TSA]

Great.

So release the Mueller report - all 100% of it.

Fuck classified, fuck grand jury, fuck fisa, fuck executive privilege - since it didn't matter when it was a HRC investigation =

RELEASE THE MUELLER REPORT -

or all that garbage is meaningless.

Except -

The right is doing everything possible to BURY IT.

Why?

1110956876315926529

:lmao again too fucking easy

[Spurs Homer]

1110956876315926529

:lmao again too fucking easy

So Schiff never gave out any "classified" info

Ok thanks

too easy

(unless your videos were supposed to say something different?)

idiot - shooting himself on the vagina

[TSA]

So Schiff never gave out any "classified" info

Ok thanks

too easy

(unless your videos were supposed to say something different?)

idiot - shooting himself on the vagina

Shook Homer doesn’t even realize what this about even though his words were quoted.

[Spurs Homer]

why are they going to bury the "grand jury" stuff?

None of that has to be buried

Mueller could redact his "methods and sources" and still release the interviews -

except those interviews would be full of evidence of trumps crimes - its called "corroboration"

so why bury that?

No sir buddy


100% of this will NEVER be over - trump will be investigated until 100% is released.

[TSA]

RELEASE THE MUELLER REPORT -



TRUMP: OK

1110956876315926529

[Spurs Homer]

Shook Homer doesn’t even realize what this about even though his words were quoted.

Idiot

You said Schiff released "classified info" and then your video shows schiff refusing to divulge classified info

so you made my point for me

thanks for being a fuckin treasonous idiot

[TSA]

why are they going to bury the "grand jury" stuff?

None of that has to be buried

Mueller could redact his "methods and sources" and still release the interviews -

except those interviews would be full of evidence of trumps crimes - its called "corroboration"

so why bury that?

No sir buddy


100% of this will NEVER be over - trump will be investigated until 100% is released.

:cry Bill Clinton was compromised by Russia :cry

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/releases/committee-outlines-regulations-for-release-of-special-counsel-reports

[TSA]

Idiot

You said Schiff released "classified info" and then your video shows schiff refusing to divulge classified info

so you made my point for me

thanks for being a fuckin treasonous idiot

You’re so shook you don’t even know what post of mine you’re responding to :rollin

[TSA]

TRUMP: OK

1110956876315926529


:rollin

[Spurs Homer]

TRUMP: OK

1110956876315926529

Idiot.

Just like trump said

"i want to testify before mueller"

and then pussied out behind closed doors

this is no different

if the fraud president says "ok" and then calls barr and says "don't you fucking dare release it"

then barr will continue to fuck around

if Trump really meant it


it would be released today - but he is scared shitless that his criminal cover up is going to slowly be exposed


Tonight - he will tell his retarded cult zombies: "im 100% exonerated" and "mueller report exonerated me"

Tomorrow : "it's up to the AG - I don't care" and "barr - you better not dare expose me"



:lmao:lmao

[DMC]

So Schiff never gave out any "classified" info

Ok thanks

too easy

(unless your videos were supposed to say something different?)

idiot - shooting himself on the vagina

You think that's Schiff?

[DMC]

Idiot.

Just like trump said

"i want to testify before mueller"

and then pussied out behind closed doors

this is no different

if the fraud president says "ok" and then calls barr and says "don't you fucking dare release it"

then barr will continue to fuck around

if Trump really meant it


it would be released today - but he is scared shitless that his criminal cover up is going to slowly be exposed


Tonight - he will tell his retarded cult zombies: "im 100% exonerated" and "mueller report exonerated me"

Tomorrow : "it's up to the AG - I don't care" and "barr - you better not dare expose me"



:lmao:lmao

Did you ever get that lime green Prius?

[Spurs Homer]

You think that's Schiff?

he was referring to post #46095

[TSA]

he was referring to post #46095

No, it was referring to post #46092, yours, the post I quoted, but you were too fucking shook and spazzing to see that.

[Spurs Homer]

No, it was referring to post #46092, yours, the post I quoted, but you were too fucking shook and spazzing to see that.

You claimed Schiff will get indicted for releasing "classified" info

YOU posted that Schiff video where he refuses to give any classified info

Sounds like you refuted your own bullshit

but that is nothing new

[TSA]

You claimed Schiff will get indicted for releasing "classified" info

YOU posted that Schiff video where he refuses to give any classified info

Sounds like you refuted your own bullshit

but that is nothing new

:lol I’ve never seen you so shook. You can’t even keep track of the shit you’ve slung at the wall

The video you are referring to was in response your quote

“RELEASE THE MUELLER REPORT -

or all that garbage is meaningless.

Except -

The right is doing everything possible to BURY IT.

Why?”

[Spurs Homer]

:lol I’ve never seen you so shook. You can’t even keep track of the shit you’ve slung at the wall

The video you are referring to was in response your quote

“RELEASE THE MUELLER REPORT -

or all that garbage is meaningless.

Except -

The right is doing everything possible to BURY IT.

Why?”

yeah ok -

shook

ok

yawn

[spurraider21]

:lol I’ve never seen you so shook.
really? him? :lol

[TSA]

Good!

he can also declassify the mueller report! (He never will)

the difference is that only one side wants full transparency

the other side is in full cover up mode!

1111375491657691136

Are you going to argue against Benjamin Wittes? Friend of James Comey?

[ElNono]

I predict Schiff will resign or be indicted.

Cool, a guess.

[spurraider21]

Cool, a guess.
he's peddling the schiff is going to resign or be indicted conspiracy theory imo

[ElNono]

he's peddling the schiff is going to resign or be indicted conspiracy theory imo

well, probably then the argument will circle around the fact that he doesn't have a MSM camera in front of him, which is really irrelevant as far as criminal conduct goes (except for unlawful document declassification).

I'm actually glad he doesn't have a MSM camera in front of him, Pizzagate would've Schiff-ed him...

[DarrinS]

When in doubt, bring up pizza

[ElNono]

When in doubt, bring up pizza

Hey, I used Schiff-ed... mixing it up, tbh

[ElNono]

plus, it's a great example of political moneyball...

[spurraider21]

When in doubt, bring up pizza
To be fair,

hillary Clinton cooks and eats babies

is a crazier conspiracy theory than anything trump related

[DMC]

To be fair,

hillary Clinton cooks and eats babies

is a crazier conspiracy theory than anything trump related
Agreed. No way in hell she cooks.

[Pavlov]

When in doubt, bring up pizzaNo one on Team Red ever really disavowed @pizzagate tbh.

[boutons_deux]

...

[DarrinS]

Boutons connecting those dots. :lol

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/1111719824240054275

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1111713320732516352

[TSA]

Like I said earlier, the fun would start once Mueller finished his report.

Trump is on the attack now.

"They spent more than $30 million, hundreds of interviews of people, in some cases very innocent people that were put through the ringer. Millions of document pages, millions and millions of document pages, and after that, there was no collusion, there was no obstruction. It was such a ridiculous thing that happened.

On the other hand, you know, you look at, how did this start? How did it start? You had dirty cops. You had people that are about FBI folks.

I know so many. They are incredible people. But at the top, they were not clean, to put it mildly. And what they did to our country was a terrible, terrible thing."

"Well, when I said there could be somebody spying on my campaign, a lot of things happened. It was like — it went wild out there. They couldn’t believe that I could say such a thing.

And as it turned out, that was a small potatoes compared to what went on. When you look at what happened, and when it happened, and the money that was spent, the millions and millions on the phony dossier, and then they used the dossier to start things, and there was no truth whatsoever. It was a fraud and paid for by Hillary Clinton and paid for by the Democrats and the DNC. It’s hard to believe.

If you wrote this as a novel, no one would buy it. It would be a failure because it will be too unbelievable. Nobody would believe it’s possible, the things that went on.

And we’re getting to the bottom of it, and it’s got to be — I mean, you can never allow this to happen to another president. This can never, ever happen to a president again, Sean. That was a disgrace and an embarrassment our country, that they were allowed to get away with this. Hopefully, they won’t get away with it."

"Well, people were hurt so badly, so badly. Their lives have been ruined and over — you know, over something that should have never taken place, an investigation that should have never happened. There was no crime, as you know.

You’re only allowed to do this legally if there is a crime. There was no crime. They’ve all admitted it. Comey, who is a terrible guy, Comey and McCabe and Strzok and Page, the lover, Page, and all of these people, they’ve admitted in testimony that there was no crime. So they’d started an investigation based on no crime."

"The insurance policy — just in case Hillary Clinton lost, they wanted an insurance policy against me. And what we were playing out until just recently was the insurance policy. They wanted to do a subversion. It was treason. It was really treason. If the Republican Party had done this to the Democrats, if we had done this to President Obama, you’d have 100 people in jail right now and it would be treason. It would be considered treason and they’d be in jail for the rest of their lives."

"But it’s very, very important for our country to know, because in 50 years from now, and 100 years from now, if someone tries the same thing, they have to know that the penalty will be very, very great, if and when they get caught."

"Well, as I told you, many, many people were hurt, incredibly hurt by this whole scam, just a scam. But it’s much worse than that. It’s at the highest level, and the importance is so — what it meant our country, it’s a very, very dark period, and I think maybe we are shedding a lot of light. We are going to come into a bright, beautiful, sunny day."

"Well, Schiff is a bad guy because he knew he was lying. I mean, he’s not a dummy. And he knew he was lying. And for a year-and-a-half, he’d go on and just lie and lie and leak and call up CNN and others and just – you know, I watch him, so sanctimonious, and gets on and says, oh, well, we want to talk about Russia. He knew it was a lie, and he’d get into the backroom with his friends in the Democrat Party, and they would laugh like hell at what they were doing. That’s a disgrace. And he knew it was a lie. And therefore, in one way, you could say it’s a crime what he did because he was giving, I mean, horrible – making horrible statements that he knew were false."

"But now I think thinking about the past is just OK because we can never let this happen again in our country or to another President. I’m not talking about me. I’m talking into the future, we can never allow this treasonous – these treasonous acts to happen to another President. This was an attempted takeover of our government, of our country, an illegal takeover. And if it were the other way around, where I was doing it to President Obama or a Democrat, it would be virtually the maximum sentence that you can find no matter where you look in whatever legal book."

"But these people, there were so many lies, and lies before Congress, which is just about the ultimate, sworn testimony where Comey told so much. And he leaked – he leaked classified information. Well, if somebody in our team leaked classified information, it would be years in jail."

"I’ll also say that you start taking a look at what happened on the tarmac. A lot of people say a lot of bad things happened on the tarmac between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton. I’ve had a lot of planes for a long time. I’ve never stopped the plane on the tarmac to let somebody on the plane. And then they when and they talked about golf and their grandchildren for 40 minutes. It doesn’t work that way. What did they talk about? And then she was exonerated. She was given one of the great free passes of all time.

And I guess Bill Clinton said he was there to play golf. But I know the – I know the area very well, Arizona. It’s a little warm at that time of the year for golf. OK? And people – a lot of people – it’s a great state, I love it, but you’re not playing a lot of golf right there at that time. So you have to find out, what happened in the back of that plane that so many things took place after that incident, that meeting between the Attorney General Lynch and Bill Clinton? A lot of bad things happened right after that. You have to find out. So there’s so many different things, and it’s important for our country that those things be determined and found out."

"Well, I think Brennan is a sick person. I really do. I believe there’s something wrong with him. And I watched for him to come out of the CIA and act that way. Was so disrespectful to the country and to the CIA and to the position he held. And he was not considered good at what he did. He was never a respected guy. Tough guy, but not a respected guy. But he lied to Congress.

And the other night, before the report came out, he predicted horrible things. So things he said were horrible. And then today, I guess he said something – I didn’t see it, but I heard he said, “Well, I must have had bad sources or bad information. I mean, this is a man who really is either sick or there’s some other problem. But the way he spoke — and as you know, Clapper lied, and perhaps the statute of limitations ran out on that one, but it didn’t run out on Comey, it didn’t run out on Brennan or Strzok or Page or McCabe.

I mean, McCabe, his wife got hundreds of thousands of dollars. He was running the FBI and running all sorts of cases, and his wife got hundreds of thousands of dollars from essentially Clintons, from Clintons’ closest friend. And then he ruled so favorably. I mean, he tries to say that he wasn’t involved. I don’t think too many people believe that. I don’t believe that. But she got all those good rulings. It’s really a scandalous situation.

And it’s so badly that it reflects so horribly a guy like Ohr, with his wife, Nellie Ohr, and GPS Fusion. She wrote the report and then goes, gives it to her husband who is at the DOJ, and then he goes and brings it to the FBI, and she’s getting paid for doing it. It’s incredible."

:corn:

[Spurs Homer]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1111713320732516352

he can stick those redactions up his fat ass

there will be a patriot that will leak this

100 percent or it is a criminal cover up

[TSA]

he can stick those redactions up his fat ass

there will be a patriot that will leak this

100 percent or it is a criminal cover up

The only thing that is 100% is your meltdown when the report is released.

[boutons_deux]

Like I said earlier, the fun would start once Mueller finished his report.

Trump is on the attack now.



Trash instigated Mueller's investigation himself, and Trash kept it in the headlines DAILY with his robotic "no collusion" repetition one or more times per day for two years.

Trash and his mafiya have been "forgetting", lying, obstructing for two years.

[Spurs Homer]

The only thing that is 100% is your meltdown when the report is released.

100 percent

unless there is something to hide

so has trump publicly denounced putin yet?
is the us (fraudulent) president bothered by russias attack?

[Spurs Homer]

Has fat fuck barr railed against russia yet?

has he publicly announced that his justice dept has initiated a plan to respond to russias attack?

funny

i bet obama would have publicly LED this country against this foreign aggression.

has OJ found the killers yet?

lololololol

[Pavlov]

Like I said earlier, the fun would start once Mueller finished his report.

Trump is on the attack now.

"They spent more than $30 million, hundreds of interviews of people, in some cases very innocent people that were put through the ringer. Millions of document pages, millions and millions of document pages, and after that, there was no collusion, there was no obstruction. It was such a ridiculous thing that happened.

On the other hand, you know, you look at, how did this start? How did it start? You had dirty cops. You had people that are about FBI folks.

I know so many. They are incredible people. But at the top, they were not clean, to put it mildly. And what they did to our country was a terrible, terrible thing."

"Well, when I said there could be somebody spying on my campaign, a lot of things happened. It was like — it went wild out there. They couldn’t believe that I could say such a thing.

And as it turned out, that was a small potatoes compared to what went on. When you look at what happened, and when it happened, and the money that was spent, the millions and millions on the phony dossier, and then they used the dossier to start things, and there was no truth whatsoever. It was a fraud and paid for by Hillary Clinton and paid for by the Democrats and the DNC. It’s hard to believe.

If you wrote this as a novel, no one would buy it. It would be a failure because it will be too unbelievable. Nobody would believe it’s possible, the things that went on.

And we’re getting to the bottom of it, and it’s got to be — I mean, you can never allow this to happen to another president. This can never, ever happen to a president again, Sean. That was a disgrace and an embarrassment our country, that they were allowed to get away with this. Hopefully, they won’t get away with it."

"Well, people were hurt so badly, so badly. Their lives have been ruined and over — you know, over something that should have never taken place, an investigation that should have never happened. There was no crime, as you know.

You’re only allowed to do this legally if there is a crime. There was no crime. They’ve all admitted it. Comey, who is a terrible guy, Comey and McCabe and Strzok and Page, the lover, Page, and all of these people, they’ve admitted in testimony that there was no crime. So they’d started an investigation based on no crime."

"The insurance policy — just in case Hillary Clinton lost, they wanted an insurance policy against me. And what we were playing out until just recently was the insurance policy. They wanted to do a subversion. It was treason. It was really treason. If the Republican Party had done this to the Democrats, if we had done this to President Obama, you’d have 100 people in jail right now and it would be treason. It would be considered treason and they’d be in jail for the rest of their lives."

"But it’s very, very important for our country to know, because in 50 years from now, and 100 years from now, if someone tries the same thing, they have to know that the penalty will be very, very great, if and when they get caught."

"Well, as I told you, many, many people were hurt, incredibly hurt by this whole scam, just a scam. But it’s much worse than that. It’s at the highest level, and the importance is so — what it meant our country, it’s a very, very dark period, and I think maybe we are shedding a lot of light. We are going to come into a bright, beautiful, sunny day."

"Well, Schiff is a bad guy because he knew he was lying. I mean, he’s not a dummy. And he knew he was lying. And for a year-and-a-half, he’d go on and just lie and lie and leak and call up CNN and others and just – you know, I watch him, so sanctimonious, and gets on and says, oh, well, we want to talk about Russia. He knew it was a lie, and he’d get into the backroom with his friends in the Democrat Party, and they would laugh like hell at what they were doing. That’s a disgrace. And he knew it was a lie. And therefore, in one way, you could say it’s a crime what he did because he was giving, I mean, horrible – making horrible statements that he knew were false."

"But now I think thinking about the past is just OK because we can never let this happen again in our country or to another President. I’m not talking about me. I’m talking into the future, we can never allow this treasonous – these treasonous acts to happen to another President. This was an attempted takeover of our government, of our country, an illegal takeover. And if it were the other way around, where I was doing it to President Obama or a Democrat, it would be virtually the maximum sentence that you can find no matter where you look in whatever legal book."

"But these people, there were so many lies, and lies before Congress, which is just about the ultimate, sworn testimony where Comey told so much. And he leaked – he leaked classified information. Well, if somebody in our team leaked classified information, it would be years in jail."

"I’ll also say that you start taking a look at what happened on the tarmac. A lot of people say a lot of bad things happened on the tarmac between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton. I’ve had a lot of planes for a long time. I’ve never stopped the plane on the tarmac to let somebody on the plane. And then they when and they talked about golf and their grandchildren for 40 minutes. It doesn’t work that way. What did they talk about? And then she was exonerated. She was given one of the great free passes of all time.

And I guess Bill Clinton said he was there to play golf. But I know the – I know the area very well, Arizona. It’s a little warm at that time of the year for golf. OK? And people – a lot of people – it’s a great state, I love it, but you’re not playing a lot of golf right there at that time. So you have to find out, what happened in the back of that plane that so many things took place after that incident, that meeting between the Attorney General Lynch and Bill Clinton? A lot of bad things happened right after that. You have to find out. So there’s so many different things, and it’s important for our country that those things be determined and found out."

"Well, I think Brennan is a sick person. I really do. I believe there’s something wrong with him. And I watched for him to come out of the CIA and act that way. Was so disrespectful to the country and to the CIA and to the position he held. And he was not considered good at what he did. He was never a respected guy. Tough guy, but not a respected guy. But he lied to Congress.

And the other night, before the report came out, he predicted horrible things. So things he said were horrible. And then today, I guess he said something – I didn’t see it, but I heard he said, “Well, I must have had bad sources or bad information. I mean, this is a man who really is either sick or there’s some other problem. But the way he spoke — and as you know, Clapper lied, and perhaps the statute of limitations ran out on that one, but it didn’t run out on Comey, it didn’t run out on Brennan or Strzok or Page or McCabe.

I mean, McCabe, his wife got hundreds of thousands of dollars. He was running the FBI and running all sorts of cases, and his wife got hundreds of thousands of dollars from essentially Clintons, from Clintons’ closest friend. And then he ruled so favorably. I mean, he tries to say that he wasn’t involved. I don’t think too many people believe that. I don’t believe that. But she got all those good rulings. It’s really a scandalous situation.

And it’s so badly that it reflects so horribly a guy like Ohr, with his wife, Nellie Ohr, and GPS Fusion. She wrote the report and then goes, gives it to her husband who is at the DOJ, and then he goes and brings it to the FBI, and she’s getting paid for doing it. It’s incredible."

:corn::lol the more he talks the less chance anything actually happens.

[Chris]

Barr says he's redacting Mueller's report for four things:

-Grand jury info
-Intel sources/methods
-Ongoing investigations
-"Reputational interests" of "peripheral third parties"

[Winehole23]

Guy who hazed Iran-Contra good now.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/dbongino/status/1111738584405630976

: )

[Spurs Homer]

Barr says he's redacting Mueller's report for four things:

-Grand jury info
-Intel sources/methods
-Ongoing investigations
-"Reputational interests" of "peripheral third parties"

What is he afraid of?

Why is he burying everything he can?

[Chris]

What is he afraid of?

Why is he burying everything he can?

Just stop. You don't fool me.

[TSA]

What is he afraid of?

Why is he burying everything he can?

Your ex-GOD Mueller is working with Barr on the redactions dipshit.

[Spurs Homer]

Your ex-GOD Mueller is working with Barr on the redactions dipshit.

Why redact - if it is going to Congress?

Congress is authorized to have 100%.

Has Trump publicly denounced Putin for Russia's attack?

Has OJ found the "killers?"


:lmao:lmao

[Spurs Homer]

Putin telling Trump to stfu

why won't trump denounce Russia?


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6861409/Russia-tells-Trump-nose-Venezuela-called-Putin-remove-troops.html

[TSA]

Why redact - if it is going to Congress?

Congress is authorized to have 100%.

Has Trump publicly denounced Putin for Russia's attack?

Has OJ found the "killers?"


:lmao:lmao

It’s being redacted for the public you dipshit.

:lol cover up

Letter from AG Barr 3.29.19
MARCH 29, 2019
Dear Chairman Graham and Chairman Nadler,

I write in response to Chairman Nadler’s March 25, 2019 letter and Chairman Graham’s March 27, 2019 letter, which addressed the investigation of Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller, III and the “confidential report” he has submitted to me pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 600.8(c).
As we have discussed, I share your desire to ensure that Congress and the public have the opportunity to read the Special Counsel’s report. We are preparing the report for release, making the redactions that are required. The Special Counsel is assisting us in this process. Specifically, we are well along in the process of identifying and redacting the following: (1) material subject to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) that by law cannot be made public; (2) material the intelligence community identifies as potentially compromising sensitive sources and methods; (3) material that could affect other ongoing matters, including those that the Special Counsel has referred to other Department offices; and (4) information that would unduly infringe on the personal privacy and reputational interests of peripheral third parties. Our progress is such that I anticipate we will be in a position to release the report by mid-April, if not sooner. Although the President would have the right to assert privilege over certain parts of the report, he has stated publicly that he intends to defer to me and, accordingly, there are no plans to submit the report to the White House for a privilege review.

Also, I am aware of some media reports and other public statements mischaracterizing my March 24, 2019 supplemental notification as a “summary” of the Special Counsel’s investigation and report. For example, Chairman Nadler’s March 25 letter refers to my supplemental notification as a “four-page summary of the Special Counsel’s review.” My March 24 letter was not, and did not purport to be, an exhaustive recounting of the Special Counsel’s investigation or report. As my letter made clear, my notification to Congress and the public provided, pending release of the report, a summary of its “principal conclusions” – that is, its bottom line. The Special Counsel’s report is nearly 400 pages long (exclusive of tables and appendices) and sets forth the Special Counsel’s findings, his analysis, and the reasons for his conclusions. Everyone will soon be able to read it on their own. I do not believe it would be in the public’s interest for me to attempt to summarize the full report or to release it in serial or piecemeal fashion.

As I have discussed with both of you, I believe it would be appropriate for me to testify publicly on behalf of the Department shortly after the Special Counsel’s report is made public. I am currently available to testify before the Senate Judicary Committee on May 1, 2019 and before the House Judiciary Committee on May 2, 2019.

Finally, in the interests of keeping the public informed as to these matters, I intend to make this letter public after delivering it to you.

[boutons_deux]

"Everyone will soon be able to read it on their own."

:lol IBIWISI

[Spurs Homer]

It’s being redacted for the public you dipshit.

:lol cover up

Letter from AG Barr 3.29.19
MARCH 29, 2019
Dear Chairman Graham and Chairman Nadler,

I write in response to Chairman Nadler’s March 25, 2019 letter and Chairman Graham’s March 27, 2019 letter, which addressed the investigation of Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller, III and the “confidential report” he has submitted to me pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 600.8(c).
As we have discussed, I share your desire to ensure that Congress and the public have the opportunity to read the Special Counsel’s report. We are preparing the report for release, making the redactions that are required. The Special Counsel is assisting us in this process. Specifically, we are well along in the process of identifying and redacting the following: (1) material subject to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) that by law cannot be made public; (2) material the intelligence community identifies as potentially compromising sensitive sources and methods; (3) material that could affect other ongoing matters, including those that the Special Counsel has referred to other Department offices; and (4) information that would unduly infringe on the personal privacy and reputational interests of peripheral third parties. Our progress is such that I anticipate we will be in a position to release the report by mid-April, if not sooner. Although the President would have the right to assert privilege over certain parts of the report, he has stated publicly that he intends to defer to me and, accordingly, there are no plans to submit the report to the White House for a privilege review.

Also, I am aware of some media reports and other public statements mischaracterizing my March 24, 2019 supplemental notification as a “summary” of the Special Counsel’s investigation and report. For example, Chairman Nadler’s March 25 letter refers to my supplemental notification as a “four-page summary of the Special Counsel’s review.” My March 24 letter was not, and did not purport to be, an exhaustive recounting of the Special Counsel’s investigation or report. As my letter made clear, my notification to Congress and the public provided, pending release of the report, a summary of its “principal conclusions” – that is, its bottom line. The Special Counsel’s report is nearly 400 pages long (exclusive of tables and appendices) and sets forth the Special Counsel’s findings, his analysis, and the reasons for his conclusions. Everyone will soon be able to read it on their own. I do not believe it would be in the public’s interest for me to attempt to summarize the full report or to release it in serial or piecemeal fashion.

As I have discussed with both of you, I believe it would be appropriate for me to testify publicly on behalf of the Department shortly after the Special Counsel’s report is made public. I am currently available to testify before the Senate Judicary Committee on May 1, 2019 and before the House Judiciary Committee on May 2, 2019.

Finally, in the interests of keeping the public informed as to these matters, I intend to make this letter public after delivering it to you.


You stupid retarded idiot -

CONGRESS needs a full 100% unredacted copy.

Congress can redact before releasing it to the public.

Congress has to do its job and review it to see EVERYTHING.

Fucking moron.

Barr is playing games. All he has to do - which the piece of shit should have done already -

is ask a Federal judge to allow the Grand Jury info to be released.

He is playing cover up because he is protecting the traitors and criminals - just like you are doing.

[spurraider21]

redactions are completely normal/standard... no need to be throwing a fit until we get the release. unless they redact literally blocks of pages at a time, there shouldnt be any issues with it.

spurshomer is just preemptively upset over what he hasn't seen yet

[ElNono]

redactions are completely normal/standard... no need to be throwing a fit until we get the release. unless they redact literally blocks of pages at a time, there shouldnt be any issues with it.

spurshomer is just preemptively upset over what he hasn't seen yet

Agreed.

Also, re-Trump "being on the attack" not sure it means much, tbh, this is the guy that retained Cohen's services for years. One thing is pretty clear, he doesn't understand a thing about law or good judgement.

[Spurs Homer]

redactions are completely normal/standard... no need to be throwing a fit until we get the release. unless they redact literally blocks of pages at a time, there shouldnt be any issues with it.

spurshomer is just preemptively upset over what he hasn't seen yet

No.

There is a reason.

Since DOJ "policy" states that a sitting president cannot be indicted - there is only one or two options.

1) Someone has to challenge this policy and indict him and test it in the courts. No one out there has the balls to follow through on this - so it only leaves one possible option...


2) CONGRESS - is the last option and if CONGRESS is the last and only option - then it is absolutely necessary for Congress to have 100% of the Mueller report. This is why I am stating that 100% has to be released.

They can redact it for the public - but Congress absolutely has a legal right to all of it because they have a job to do.

Barr citing any other rules or DOJ laws is a sham - because if you already decided a sitting president is not going to be indicted and then you go further - by handcuffing Congress - then you are a piece of shit trying to put YOUR beliefs into the legal system. Barr is not the fucking decider here.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/ARmastrangelo/status/1111802910927671302

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1112046836166975488

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/1112011619792498688

[Pavlov]

:lol still sprung on Black President

[Spurs Homer]

https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/1112011619792498688

Why are they still "worried" after the "exoneration?"

Because the "cover up" is crumbling...

[Chris]

Why are they still "worried" after the "exoneration?"

Because the "cover up" is crumbling...

Run your troll schtick on someone else. I'm not going to waste my time even reading your posts.

[boutons_deux]

redactions are completely normal/standard

but Trash and his chosen coverup AG are ABnormal

all the redactions will be only to protect Trash

[Chucho]

Why are they still "worried" after the "exoneration?"

Because the "cover up" is crumbling...

What coverup? What's the evidence you have? Dead serious, I will read and listen to your arguments with respect if you can cut the Boots-lite schtick and rage when spelling these arguments out.

[Spurs Homer]

What coverup? What's the evidence you have? Dead serious, I will read and listen to your arguments with respect if you can cut the Boots-lite schtick and rage when spelling these arguments out.


1) Trump harasses Sessions and publicly states that he needs a "Roy Cohn" to protect him.
2) Trump fires Sessions because Sessions in unable to protect him.
3) Barr - who has already covered for two Republican presidents in past scandals - writes a 19 page memo - detailing why a president is above the law - Barr was not even in gov't at the time - just out of the blue -
4) Trump installs him as AG. In his confirmation hearing Barr is asked, "if the ethics commission recommends that you recuse from the Russia investigation based on their findings that it would be unethical for you to remain - will you follow their advice and recuse so as to remove any appearance of impropriety?" Barr answered that he would not recuse or would not recuse if he decided he didn't want to. They followed up with this question, "on what basis would you refuse - if they just advised you that it would be in the public interest to recuse and it would create an appearance of bias - why would you still refuse?" Barr said because he would not agree with their facts. They persisted - "but if their recommendation was based on FACTS - how can you credibly sit here and say you would dispute their facts?" - Barr: "On the basis that I disagreed with the facts!"
5) Barr gets the Mueller report and buries it. Barr gives a summary and when Barr states that "mueller did not decide on obstruction - SO I AM DECIDING that Trump is not guilty of obstruction - then Barr has just placed his thumb on the scale - rather than to lawfully and rightfully allow Congress to do its constitutional duty to decide on Trump obstruction of justice - AFTER reviewing Mueller's FACTS.
6) Barr gives Trump a weeks - or months - long head start into spinning the "completely exonerated" narrative so that people like you can parrot the "mueller exonerated him" bullshit.
7) Barr is now deciding the fate of a nation by burying the Mueller report - and by burying parts of the report using DOJ guidelines - which DO NOT APPLY - if you:
a) conclude that a president cannot be indicted
b) the only recourse would be Congress - which would - by law - be REQUIRED to have 100% of the facts of the case to be able to fulfill its constitutional duty - but BARR is saying to Congress - "I am following these rules - and have to redact this and that - so sorry - you cannot see what I see - even though I cannot indict and I also cannot allow you to investigate properly...etc"


So is BARR - who was hand-picked by Trump to be his "roy cohn" the person who is the "ultimate arbiter" of USA Justice?

If Obama had colluded with Iran and then fired the FBI director and then invited the Mullahs to the Oval office and bragged about firing the "nut job" fbi director to ease the Iran/Obama scandal investigation -

and then a special counsel was appointed and Obama hired Eric Holder to "protect him" and then the media pointed out 50-100 instances of public collusion and public obstruction of justice by Obama -

and when the SC issued his findings -

Eric Holder would bury the report and issue a summary saying:

"obama did not obstruct (even though you saw it with your own eyes!) and the SC found evidence of collusion- (which you also saw with your own eyes!) but just not enough - so - nothing to see here and stop being sore losers - just exonerate Lord Obama!


You would not see a cover up there?

[Chucho]

1) Trump harasses Sessions and publicly states that he needs a "Roy Cohn" to protect him.
2) Trump fires Sessions because Sessions in unable to protect him.
3) Barr - who has already covered for two Republican presidents in past scandals - writes a 19 page memo - detailing why a president is above the law - Barr was not even in gov't at the time - just out of the blue -
4) Trump installs him as AG. In his confirmation hearing Barr is asked, "if the ethics commission recommends that you recuse from the Russia investigation based on their findings that it would be unethical for you to remain - will you follow their advice and recuse so as to remove any appearance of impropriety?" Barr answered that he would not recuse or would not recuse if he decided he didn't want to. They followed up with this question, "on what basis would you refuse - if they just advised you that it would be in the public interest to recuse and it would create an appearance of bias - why would you still refuse?" Barr said because he would not agree with their facts. They persisted - "but if their recommendation was based on FACTS - how can you credibly sit here and say you would dispute their facts?" - Barr: "On the basis that I disagreed with the facts!"
5) Barr gets the Mueller report and buries it. Barr gives a summary and when Barr states that "mueller did not decide on obstruction - SO I AM DECIDING that Trump is not guilty of obstruction - then Barr has just placed his thumb on the scale - rather than to lawfully and rightfully allow Congress to do its constitutional duty to decide on Trump obstruction of justice - AFTER reviewing Mueller's FACTS.
6) Barr gives Trump a weeks - or months - long head start into spinning the "completely exonerated" narrative so that people like you can parrot the "mueller exonerated him" bullshit.
7) Barr is now deciding the fate of a nation by burying the Mueller report - and by burying parts of the report using DOJ guidelines - which DO NOT APPLY - if you:
a) conclude that a president cannot be indicted
b) the only recourse would be Congress - which would - by law - be REQUIRED to have 100% of the facts of the case to be able to fulfill its constitutional duty - but BARR is saying to Congress - "I am following these rules - and have to redact this and that - so sorry - you cannot see what I see - even though I cannot indict and I also cannot allow you to investigate properly...etc"


So is BARR - who was hand-picked by Trump to be his "roy cohn" the person who is the "ultimate arbiter" of USA Justice?

If Obama had colluded with Iran and then fired the FBI director and then invited the Mullahs to the Oval office and bragged about firing the "nut job" fbi director to ease the Iran/Obama scandal investigation -

and then a special counsel was appointed and Obama hired Eric Holder to "protect him" and then the media pointed out 50-100 instances of public collusion and public obstruction of justice by Obama -

and when the SC issued his findings -

Eric Holder would bury the report and issue a summary saying:

"obama did not obstruct (even though you saw it with your own eyes!) and the SC found evidence of collusion- (which you also saw with your own eyes!) but just not enough - so - nothing to see here and stop being sore losers - just exonerate Lord Obama!


You would not see a cover up there?

That's all fair and valid. +3.

[Spurs Homer]

That's all fair and valid. +3.

Just giving you a courtesy response -

I am just saying -


100% of the Mueller report and Mueller testifying under oath in front of the nation -is the fair and righteous thing to do.

If Mueller's testimony and his 100% of his report exonerates Trump - I will agree with Mueller's assessment.

I just do not agree that what Trump/Barr concocted is going to fly and having been lied to by Trump - thousands of times -

nor should ANYONE take his word at all when dealing with such an important issue.

[Chucho]

Just giving you a courtesy response -

I am just saying -


100% of the Mueller report and Mueller testifying under oath in front of the nation -is the fair and righteous thing to do.

If Mueller's testimony and his 100% of his report exonerates Trump - I will agree with Mueller's assessment.

I just do not agree that what Trump/Barr concocted is going to fly and having been lied to by Trump - thousands of times -

nor should ANYONE take his word at all when dealing with such an important issue.

Despite your false notion I am a Trump supporter (I originally was, to be fair), I am all for transparency and if proven, I will call for his head as well. That said, I have no faith in any government transparency and have felt more and more apathy towards "scandals" as every administration I've voted for has highly scandalous moments on their track records that would/should dictate their removal from office and everytime it becomes less and less painful to see these abuses of power that somehow are softened or "covered up" some shape, form or fashion.

I could yell as loud as you, but I've become accustomed to the end result; no action.

[Spurs Homer]

Despite your false notion I am a Trump supporter (I originally was, to be fair), I am all for transparency and if proven, I will call for his head as well. That said, I have no faith in any government transparency and have felt more and more apathy towards "scandals" as every administration I've voted for has highly scandalous moments on their track records that would/should dictate their removal from office and everytime it becomes less and less painful to see these abuses of power that somehow are softened or "covered up" some shape, form or fashion.

I could yell as loud as you, but I've become accustomed to the end result; no action.

I get that.

Your right. (to do so)

But - I HAVE to stress this:

This is way way different than any scandal before. Yes almost every administration has scandals - and even when they were pretty clean (Obama) - the other side would try to create one - I get it and it is disgusting.


THIS scandal is the FIRST TIME that an enemy foreign gov't was involved and this makes this one absolutely the most horrifying of all because...

if what the evidence suggests is confirmed -

we have 40% of the country siding with an enemy gov't because they are spellbound by a con man.

How do we get those 40% to break the spell?

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1111835155545640960
TSA

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1111835155545640960
TSA:lol Huber is the special counsel.

[Chris]

:lol Huber is the special counsel.

You said Huber was a nobody and wasn't investigating anything on your Pavlov account. Now Huber is "THE SPECIAL COUNSEL." :lol

[ChumpDumper]

You said Huber was a nobody and wasn't investigating anything on your Pavlov account. Now Huber is "THE SPECIAL COUNSEL." :lolHe isn't investigating anything.

He's reviewing the investigations that already happened.

And he's the de facto Special Counsel because it's not his normal job.

:lol Qhris

Need anything else explained to you? Need it dumbed down further?

[Chris]

He isn't investigating anything.

John Huber, who will investigate the FBI, is a special counsel in every way but name
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/apr/1/john-huber-us-attorney-leading-fbi-investigation-s/


Mystery surrounds Sessions appointee to FBI investigation
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/381888-mystery-surrounds-sessions-appointee-to-fbi-investigation

Who is John Huber, the man appointed to investigate GOP concerns about FBI, Justice Department
https://www.ajc.com/news/national/who-john-huber-the-man-appointed-investigate-gop-concerns-about-fbi-justice-department/EpVp5miuzXzTVh6aufFhOI/


:lol Chumpdumper

[Chris]

https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2F31.media.tumblr.com%2F4f1ea9486a28 64f610bc912ff784a8a5%2Ftumblr_ne1lvcrDpx1s3gys4o1_ 400.gif&f=1

[ChumpDumper]

John Huber, who will investigate the FBI, is a special counsel in every way but name
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/apr/1/john-huber-us-attorney-leading-fbi-investigation-s/


Mystery surrounds Sessions appointee to FBI investigation
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/381888-mystery-surrounds-sessions-appointee-to-fbi-investigation

Who is John Huber, the man appointed to investigate GOP concerns about FBI, Justice Department
https://www.ajc.com/news/national/who-john-huber-the-man-appointed-investigate-gop-concerns-about-fbi-justice-department/EpVp5miuzXzTVh6aufFhOI/


:lol Chumpdumper:lol your first link completely agrees with me.

Also:


Dear Mr. Huber:

In consultation with the Deputy Attorney General, I have requested that you review the matters referenced in the enclosed November 13, 2017, letter from Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Robert Goodlatte and make recommendations to me or the Deputy Attorney General, as appropriate. Your review need not include matters that you determine are within the scope of the investigation being conducted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

Your recommendations should include whether any matters not currently under investigation warrants the opening of an investigation, whether any matters currently under investigation require further resources or further investigation, and whether any matters would merit the appointment of a Special Counsel.


Sincerely,

Jefferson B. Sessions III
Attorney General

:lol Qhris

[koriwhat]

https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2F31.media.tumblr.com%2F4f1ea9486a28 64f610bc912ff784a8a5%2Ftumblr_ne1lvcrDpx1s3gys4o1_ 400.gif&f=1

damn kemp was phenomenal back in the day

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1112134171638423553

[ElNono]

Mueller bad again?

[Spurs Homer]

what is the deal with the first page? not clicking on that shit - is that some type of hacking?


wtf?

[DarrinS]

what is the deal with the first page? not clicking on that shit - is that some type of hacking?


wtf?

Russians. You were very wise not to click.

[Spurs Homer]

Russians. You were very wise not to click.

did OJ find the “killers” yet?

lololololol

[Reck]

he can stick those redactions up his fat ass

there will be a patriot that will leak this

100 percent or it is a criminal cover up

Who's covering it up?

Barr may be a Trumper but he's not stupid to go to jail over him either. Besides, how would he covered Trump's deed when select members of congress will get to see the report fully unredacted at some point.

[Spurs Homer]

Who's covering it up?

Barr may be a Trumper but he's not stupid to go to jail over him either. Besides, how would he covered Trump's deed when select members of congress will get to see the report fully unredacted at some point.


we dont know any of that

has trump denounced russia for the attack yet?

[boutons_deux]

I don't think pencil-neck Schiff will ever see the full unredacted Mueller report including supporting materials, without a trip to SCOTUS

Has Mueller kept a copy in case Barr destroys Barr's original?

Slimebag Trash's people are now fund-raising off Trash's name calling.

[Winehole23]

I basically agree with this. Because of L'Affaire Russe, Dems never came to account for why they lost.


Russiagate became a convenient replacement explanation absolving an incompetent political establishment for its complicity in what happened in 2016, and not just the failure to see it coming. Because of the immediate arrival of the collusion theory, neither Wolf Blitzer nor any politician ever had to look into the camera and say, “I guess people hated us so much they were even willing to vote for Donald Trump.”

[boutons_deux]

"hated so much" Hillary won by 2.8M votes, a perfectly reasonable winning margin, but lost to Comey / Pootin / Repug vote cheating, and the archaic, anti-democratic Electoral College designed by 18th century elite to disenfranchise Americans.

[Winehole23]

Comey a Russian stooge now

[Winehole23]

dual track Mueller probe:


The range of conduct that can be prohibited by criminal statute is limited by, among other things, the Constitution—for example, the vagueness doctrine, which requires a statute to state clearly and explicitly the conduct that is prohibited—and the ability of Congress to foresee the possibility of certain harmful conduct. The criminal code is not necessarily comprehensive when it comes to prohibiting conduct that society finds morally or ethically reprehensible, or even a potential threat to American interests or national security. A counterintelligence investigation, on the other hand, has a different purpose or objective—to identify and mitigate threats posed by foreign governments. In other words, such investigations have a broader focus, and their implications are potentially far more concerning from a national security standpoint. Just because someone is not (yet) a criminal does not mean he or she is not a threat.


The evidentiary standards are quite different. In the criminal context, the government must prove each element of a criminal offense beyond a reasonable doubt. Certain forms of evidence, such as hearsay, are inadmissible. And even when the government possesses evidence that can meet those standards, the level of transparency associated with criminal trials sometimes causes the government to forego prosecution to protect sensitive intelligence. In a counterintelligence investigation, however, the government can look at—and make judgments based on—the full body of information in its possession. Despite its imperfections (to say nothing of the criminal justice system’s own propensity to produce wrong results), there are things that, from an intelligence perspective, the government knows or believes with high confidence that it cannot—or chooses not to—prove in a court of law.





https://www.lawfareblog.com/understand-muellers-work-focus-counterintelligence

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1112403803335282692

[Pavlov]

WOW!

MEETINGGATE!

THIS CHANGES EVERYTHIHNG!

[boutons_deux]

when IC reports to Congress, "Trash's deep state Nazis" could expected, in retaliation, maybe unconsciously, overstate their case(s) against Trash and his mafiya as intelligence criminals.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1112426649323134976

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1112431462803013632

Obamagate : )

[Reck]

https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1112426649323134976

Tweets from a convicted felon are to be taken serious now.

[Chris]

Clapper good now : )

Clapper running his yapper is damn good : )

[Spurs Homer]

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1112403803335282692


hrc’s advisors were russians?

has OJ caught the killers yet?

has trump denounced russia?

is trump acting to stop russia from entering venezuela?

[Chris]

^ That's 2+ years of MUH RUSSIA talkin'

[Pavlov]

Qhris has a new troll phrase.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1112434989017325569

Psyops you say?

[Spurs Homer]

https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1112434989017325569

Psyops you say?

Awesome - the guy who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI - and admitted that he repeatedly offered the Trump campaign a meeting between Trump and Putin -

is now trying to invent "conspiracy theories"


:lmao:lmao


Qhris: Pay attention:

1) This guy was working for the Trump campaign
2) He suggested - several times - that he could set up a meeting between Putin and Trump
3) The FBI nabbed his ass - after he lied about this FACT.
4) Once the FBI had him - he decided to PLEAD GUILTY - about this lie and ADMITTED that he had - in fact - tried to set up this mtg

5) Now he is a FELON who is changing his story that he was already convicted for.


How stupid are you?

[Pavlov]

Whenever they break out the Infowars terms, you know it's bullshit.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1112455321048567808

[Chris]

We may need a Special Counsel...


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D2jzaiAVAAMvcEJ.jpg:large
HZIZdTBwsm8

[Spurs Homer]

:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao


The banjo-playing hillbilly from "Deliverance" is the best they got?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsC4kf6x_Q0

[Chris]

Just a theory.

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1112455321048567808Wow, he doesn't know about look at probability.

That's definitive.

[TSA]

Awesome - the guy who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI - and admitted that he repeatedly offered the Trump campaign a meeting between Trump and Putin -

is now trying to invent "conspiracy theories"


:lmao:lmao


Qhris: Pay attention:

1) This guy was working for the Trump campaign
2) He suggested - several times - that he could set up a meeting between Putin and Trump
3) The FBI nabbed his ass - after he lied about this FACT.
4) Once the FBI had him - he decided to PLEAD GUILTY - about this lie and ADMITTED that he had - in fact - tried to set up this mtg

5) Now he is a FELON who is changing his story that he was already convicted for.


How stupid are you?

Papadapolous wasn't arrested for lying that he could set up a meeting between Putin and Trump and Papadapolous wasn't charged for lying about setting up a meeting between Putin and Trump.

How stupid are you to get such a simple FACT wrong?

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1112403803335282692
:lmao simple jack posting october 2016 articles... poor fella

[Spurs Homer]

Papadapolous wasn't arrested for lying that he could set up a meeting between Putin and Trump and Papadapolous wasn't charged for lying about setting up a meeting between Putin and Trump.

How stupid are you to get such a simple FACT wrong?

has trump denounced russia for the cyberattack yet?

lolololol

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1112835496592531456

[TSA]

1112789629277757440

Another Solobomb

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1112892725081374720

[boutons_deux]

“THIS IS SPY-HUNTING”: INSIDE THE DARK HEART OF THE MUELLER REPORT

Robert Mueller’s secret counter-intelligence findings may be the key to understanding the Russiagate scandal and its implications for U.S. national security. And yet the public may never see them.

Many of the most astonishing episodes involving Trump or his associates colluding with Russian agents are in the public record.

On the campaign trail, Trump called (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/13/us/politics/trump-russia-clinton-emails.html) for Russian hackers to target Hillary Clinton (https://www.vanityfair.com/people/hillary-clinton#intcid=dt-hot-link);

his son, son-in-law, and campaign manager met with a Kremlin-linked attorney at Trump Tower to secure “high level and sensitive information” on Clinton as part of what they were told was “Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump”;

a campaign aide, George Papadopoulos, went abroad in hopes of securing a meeting between Trump and Vladimir Putin (https://www.vanityfair.com/people/vladimir-putin#intcid=dt-hot-link) while

another adviser, Roger Stone, got in contact with Russian military intelligence.

During the White House transition, there were a flurry of contacts between Trumpworld and Moscow, including

an effort by Jared Kushner to establish a secret backchannel with the Kremlin.

Later, as president,

Trump bragged (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/19/us/politics/trump-russia-comey.html) about firing Comey to Russian officials in the Oval Office,

sought out private meetings with Putin, and

repeatedly sided with Russian intelligence over the assessments of his own agencies.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/03/robert-mueller-report-counterintelligence-report (https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/03/robert-mueller-report-counterintelligence-report)

[Spurs Homer]

Where is the mueller report?

why is the criminal traitor desperately throwing out

distraction after distraction?

close the border -cause chaos- forget the mueller report

health care fight - cause an uproar - nothing to see in the mueller report

fox news- hurry run with the “exoneration” report and ridicule anyone wanting to see the full mueller report

coverrrr. Uppppp!!!!

[boutons_deux]

Another Solobomb

misfires, dud, poof, no evidence, no details

[Chris]

Where is the mueller report?

It's with William Barr and Robert Mueller.

Solly cholly no leaky leaky this time.

[koriwhat]

Where is the mueller report?

why is the criminal traitor desperately throwing out

distraction after distraction?

close the border -cause chaos- forget the mueller report

health care fight - cause an uproar - nothing to see in the mueller report

fox news- hurry run with the “exoneration” report and ridicule anyone wanting to see the full mueller report

coverrrr. Uppppp!!!!

your tears are so god damn tasty! :cry :cry :cry

[Spurs Homer]

The entire right wing traitors are fighting really hard - and whining really hard -

about

BURYING THE MUELLER REPORT.


What are they hiding?

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1113565553115811840

Big Papa

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1113565553115811840

Big Papa:lmao

[Spurs Homer]

Welp....

the cover up is starting to crumble...


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/us/politics/mueller-report-barr.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

[Spurs Homer]

The special counsel’s investigators had already written multiple summaries of the report, and some team members believe that Mr. Barr should have included more of their material in the four-page letter (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/03/24/us/politics/barr-letter-mueller-report.html?module=inline) he wrote on March 24 laying out their main conclusions, according to government officials familiar with the investigation. Mr. Barr only briefly cited the special counsel’s work in his letter.

[Chris]

Crawl MF'er crawl!

[Spurs Homer]

Two years of "no leaks" from Mueller team -

is now going to change because of ....


the cover up...

[Spurs Homer]

Crawl MF'er crawl!


The traitor in chief failed in his cover up CON JOB



:lmao:lmao

[TSA]

Comey says he fears possible counterinvestigation after Mueller report

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/02/comey-mueller-counter-investigation-1249236

https://media.giphy.com/media/xn8USUaGUJ6U0/giphy.gif

[Pavlov]

Comey says he fears possible counterinvestigation after Mueller report

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/02/comey-mueller-counter-investigation-1249236

https://media.giphy.com/media/xn8USUaGUJ6U0/giphy.gif"I don't fear it personally. I fear it as a citizen....Investigate what? Investigate that investigations were conducted? What would be the crime you’d be investigating?"

These questions won't be answered.

“Me, personally, ask me questions. Go ahead. I would like to answer them in the daylight, if I could.”

Yeah, he sounds personally terrified.

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1113565553115811840

Big Papa

:bobo

Schiff document raises new question about FBI’s FISA court evidence

"Because if we go by the official record, and by the statements from Downer and Papadopoulos – including what Mueller accepted from Papadopoulos in the plea agreement – the FBI in October 2016 did not know from any source we’ve been told about that Mifsud said “dirt” and “thousands of emails” to Papadopoulos on 26 April 2016.

That makes a nugget just unearthed in a report from March 2018 a very interesting one. The report is a summary by the minority staff of the House Intelligence Committee, which at the time was the Democrats’ staff, led by the ranking member, Adam Schiff."


"Here is what the Democrats’ summary says on page 4. Note the passage down in the paragraph highlighted in boldface:

Campaign knowledge of email hack. As the Special Counsel has revealed, weeks before the world learned that Russian actors hacked into the DNC and the Clinton campaign, the Russians, through intermediaries, informed one of candidate Trump’s five named foreign policy advisors, George Papadopoulos, in April 2016 that the Russian government had “dirt” on Hillary Clinton in the form of “thousands of emails.” In evidenc [sic] evidence before the FISA Court, the DOJ also revealed that the Russians previewed the release of this information to Mr. Papadopoulos at that time. The early date of this contact is significant: even the Clinton campaign was not yet aware that Russia possessed their stolen emails.

The minority summary appears to be indicating that at least one of the FISA applications used information the FBI apparently had about the April 2016 meeting – but did not obtain from Downer or from Halper.

The Democrats in fact emphasized in their summary that the date of Mifsud’s disclosure to Papadopoulos was “significant,” because it meant Mifsud was telling Papadopoulos about the email heist before the Clinton campaign knew about it.

The principal take-away from this passage is that what went into the FISA application looked, almost word for word, like what was in the NYT article from December 2017.

Yet the FBI, according to the official version of events, had no way of knowing, when it first presented the FISA application, that Mifsud had spoken to Papadopoulos in the terms outlined in that article. Not only had Papadopoulos not said such words to Downer or Halper; he hadn’t even told others in the Trump campaign. (Note: Margot Cleveland came to a similar conclusion in June 2018, although she didn’t reference the March 2018 minority staff summary at the time. The nugget from the March 2018 summary clarifies that including Papadopoulos in the FISA justification does, in fact, need an explanation.)"


https://libertyunyielding.com/2019/04/04/schiff-document-raises-new-question-about-fbis-fisa-court-evidence/

[Chris]

:bobo

Schiff document raises new question about FBI’s FISA court evidence

"Because if we go by the official record, and by the statements from Downer and Papadopoulos – including what Mueller accepted from Papadopoulos in the plea agreement – the FBI in October 2016 did not know from any source we’ve been told about that Mifsud said “dirt” and “thousands of emails” to Papadopoulos on 26 April 2016.

That makes a nugget just unearthed in a report from March 2018 a very interesting one. The report is a summary by the minority staff of the House Intelligence Committee, which at the time was the Democrats’ staff, led by the ranking member, Adam Schiff."


"Here is what the Democrats’ summary says on page 4. Note the passage down in the paragraph highlighted in boldface:

Campaign knowledge of email hack. As the Special Counsel has revealed, weeks before the world learned that Russian actors hacked into the DNC and the Clinton campaign, the Russians, through intermediaries, informed one of candidate Trump’s five named foreign policy advisors, George Papadopoulos, in April 2016 that the Russian government had “dirt” on Hillary Clinton in the form of “thousands of emails.” In evidenc [sic] evidence before the FISA Court, the DOJ also revealed that the Russians previewed the release of this information to Mr. Papadopoulos at that time. The early date of this contact is significant: even the Clinton campaign was not yet aware that Russia possessed their stolen emails.

The minority summary appears to be indicating that at least one of the FISA applications used information the FBI apparently had about the April 2016 meeting – but did not obtain from Downer or from Halper.

The Democrats in fact emphasized in their summary that the date of Mifsud’s disclosure to Papadopoulos was “significant,” because it meant Mifsud was telling Papadopoulos about the email heist before the Clinton campaign knew about it.

The principal take-away from this passage is that what went into the FISA application looked, almost word for word, like what was in the NYT article from December 2017.

Yet the FBI, according to the official version of events, had no way of knowing, when it first presented the FISA application, that Mifsud had spoken to Papadopoulos in the terms outlined in that article. Not only had Papadopoulos not said such words to Downer or Halper; he hadn’t even told others in the Trump campaign. (Note: Margot Cleveland came to a similar conclusion in June 2018, although she didn’t reference the March 2018 minority staff summary at the time. The nugget from the March 2018 summary clarifies that including Papadopoulos in the FISA justification does, in fact, need an explanation.)"


https://libertyunyielding.com/2019/04/04/schiff-document-raises-new-question-about-fbis-fisa-court-evidence/

:bobo

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1113818205414256640

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/dbongino/status/1113894065735598081

: )

[boutons_deux]

Michael Cohen says he has more Trump documents — and offers new assistance to Dem investigators

“Mr. Cohen was only recently able to access a hard drive with important documents,” wrote Cohen’s attorneys in a letter (https://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2019/images/04/04/04.04.19.cover.letter._redacted[1].pdf)obtained by CNN.

“Said drive contains over 14 million files,

which consist of all e-mails,

voice recordings,

images, and

attachments from Mr. Cohen’s computers and phones.

To date, Mr. Cohen has located

several documents that we believe have significant value to the various congressional oversight and investigation committees.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/michael-cohen-says-trump-documents-offers-new-assistance-dem-investigators-report/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29 (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/michael-cohen-says-trump-documents-offers-new-assistance-dem-investigators-report/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29)

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1113818205414256640
Nothing at all would've happened if you went to the FBI from the start like you're required to.

[boutons_deux]

Nothing at all would've happened if you went to the FBI from the start like you're required to.

A federal judge sentenced George Papadopoulos, a onetime aide to President Donald Trump’s campaign, to two weeks in prison and a $9,500 fine on Friday

for lying to federal agents about conversations in which he was told that the Russian government had obtained “dirt” on Hillary Clinton.

"I made a terrible mistake for which I paid dearly and I am terribly ashamed," Papadopoulos said at his sentencing hearing.

"My entire life has been turned upside down."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/09/07/george-papadopoulos-ex-trump-aide-sentenced-russian-dirt-lie/1223711002/ (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/09/07/george-papadopoulos-ex-trump-aide-sentenced-russian-dirt-lie/1223711002/)

didn't tell the FBI and then LIED to the FBI, so now he's innocent? :lol

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1114028740370161665

This could be huge.

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1114028740370161665

This could be huge.

Cambridge Academic Reflects On Interactions With ‘Spygate’ Figure

Svetlana Lokhova did not get along with Stefan Halper, which is what she says made a dinner invitation to the Cambridge University professor’s home in January 2016 all the more peculiar.

“Halper was a lurking presence with a horrible aura — I avoided him,” said Lokhova, a Cambridge post-graduate student who studies Soviet-era espionage.

Lokhova dodged the invitation to Halper’s home, which she said was sent to her by Christopher Andrew, a Cambridge professor and official historian for MI5, the British domestic intelligence service. But the past three years have revealed new details about Halper and other activities that went on at Cambridge that have caused Lokhova to question why she was asked to that dinner at Halper’s.

For one, a series of stories that appeared in the press in early 2017 heavily implied Lokhova was a Russian agent who tried to suborn Michael Flynn at a dinner hosted at Cambridge on Feb. 28, 2014. Flynn served at the time as director of the Defense Intelligence Agency.

A year after those stories appeared, The Daily Caller News Foundation reported Halper cozied to three Trump campaign advisers, Carter Page, Sam Clovis and George Papadopoulos. In May 2018, Halper was revealed as a longtime CIA and FBI informant, a revelation that led President Donald Trump to accuse the FBI of planting a spy in his campaign. The Republican coined the term “Spygate” to describe the alleged scandal.

After Halper’s links to American intelligence were revealed, The New York Times and The Washington Post reported he and another Cambridge luminary, former MI6 chief Richard Dearlove, raised concerns about Lokhova’s contacts with Flynn that were subsequently passed to American and British intelligence.

Lokhova blames Halper for distorting her brief interaction with Flynn into “an international espionage scandal” in which she wound up as collateral damage.

“What Halper staged is a textbook ‘black-op’ to dirty up the reputation of a political opponent. He needed an innocuous social event to place Flynn in a room with a woman who was ethnically Russian. I was unlucky he picked me,” Lokhova told TheDCNF.

Lokhova, a dual Russian and British citizen, has spoken out before about Halper and the allegations about her in the media. She accused Halper of making “false” and “absurd” claims about her in 2018 interviews with TheDCNF. She has also taken to Twitter to criticize reporters who published allegations about her and Flynn.

The Guardian’s Luke Harding is one target of Lokhova’s ire. She has criticized the British reporter for a March 31, 2017, story that contained thinly veiled allegations she tried to compromise Flynn.

According to the report, which was based on anonymous sources, American and British intelligence developed concerns about Lokhova’s interactions with Flynn at the February 2014 dinner, which was hosted by the Cambridge Intelligence Seminar. Halper, Dearlove and Andrew are co-conveners of the seminar, which hosts events for current and former spies.

The Wall Street Journal also published an innuendo-laden story March 18, 2017, about Flynn and Lokhova. The hook for the story was that Flynn had failed to report his contact with Lokhova to the Defense Intelligence Agency.

Lokhova, who has lived in the U.K. since 1998, vehemently denies the insinuations in the articles that she is a Russian agent or that she tried to seduce Flynn. She has provided emails and photographs to TheDCNF to help back up her case. She also notes that all of the allegations about her have been made anonymously.

Dan O’Brien, a Defense Intelligence Agency official who accompanied Flynn to the Cambridge event, told TheWSJ he saw nothing untoward involving Lokhova. Lokhova’s partner, David North, has told TheDCNF he picked Lokhova up after the event.

Since learning more about Halper, Lokhova has reflected back on the few interactions she had with him over the years at Cambridge.

A veteran of three Republican administrations, Halper joined Cambridge in 2001. From his perch at the stories university, Halper wrote books about American politics and the geopolitical threat that China poses to the West. He also received over $1 million in contracts from the Pentagon’s Office of Net Assessment to write studies on Russia, China and Afghanistan.

Lokhova says she first remembers seeing Halper in November 2013, when she gave a talk about her research on Soviet-era spy archives. The pair had few direct interactions over the next several years, even though they attended the same academic seminars. Lokhova recalls one interaction in 2014 or 2015 when Halper sat down at a table with her and North.

“The guy looks at us like we’re completely horrible people, and then gets up and sits across the room.”

Lokhova also said she learned from a Cambridge faculty member that Halper was spreading rumors that she was linked to Russian intelligence.

On March 25, 2018, TheDCNF reported on Halper’s contacts with the Trump campaign.

Halper, whose late father-in-law was legendary CIA official Ray Cline, made contact with Page at a political forum hosted at Cambridge on July 11, 2016, nearly three weeks before the FBI opened its investigation of the Trump campaign. Page attended the event after receiving an invitation in June 2016 from a Ph.D. student who studied under Halper.

Halper reached out to Papdopoulos in September 2016, and offered the young Trump aide $3,000 and a trip to London to write a policy paper on energy issues. (RELATED: Cambridge Prof With MI6, CIA Ties Met With Carter Page During Campaign, Beyond)

Two months after TheDCNF report, the Times and Post identified Halper as a longtime FBI and CIA informant sent to gather intelligence on the Trump campaign. The newspapers also reported Halper was one of those at Cambridge who had expressed concerns about Lokhova’s interaction with Flynn.

The Times reported May 18, 2018, that Halper “was alarmed by the general’s apparent closeness with a Russian woman who was also in attendance.”

“The concern was strong enough that it prompted another person to pass on a warning to the American authorities that Mr. Flynn could be compromised by Russian intelligence, according to two people familiar with the matter.”

The Post reported June 5, 2018, that Halper and Dearlove were “disconcerted” by Flynn and Lokhova’s interactions in 2014. Those concerns were provided to American and British intelligence, though it is unclear if Halper and Dearlove were direct sources for the government agencies. Dearlove met prior to the 2016 U.S. election with Christopher Steele, the former MI6 officer who authored the infamous anti-Trump dossier alleging a “well-developed conspiracy” between the Trump campaign and Kremlin.

***

Christopher Andrew’s Jan. 12, 2016, dinner invitation sticks out in Lokhova’s mind not just because of its randomness — “it came out of the blue,” she says — but also because of all of the other events that unfolded at that time.

Lokhova says Christopher Andrew emailed her asking her to keep Feb. 13 and Feb. 20, 2016, open on her calendar to attend a dinner for Halper’s wife.

Lokhova, who wrote her dissertation under Andrew’s direction, says she was caught off guard by the invitation, both because she had barely spoken to Halper and because she did not know Halper’s wife.

Lokhova has no proof that she was being lured to meet with Halper in order to gather dirt on Flynn, but she is now suspicious because of the timing of the invite.

In December 2015, a month before the invitation, Flynn attended a gala hosted by RT, the Russia-owned news agency. The Moscow visit is often cited as evidence of Flynn’s too-close links to Moscow. Flynn joined the Trump campaign as an informal adviser in February 2016.

***

The allegations about Flynn and Lokhova came out of nowhere.

In an essay at the London Times on Feb. 19, 2017, Christopher Andrew wrote of the “impulsive” former national security adviser he had met for the first time three years earlier.

Andrew’s essay was a response to Flynn’s firing as national security adviser. Flynn, a retired lieutenant general, was forced to resign Feb. 14, 2017, after allegedly lying to the White House about his contacts in December 2016 with then-Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak. Flynn would later plead guilty to lying to the FBI about those contacts.

Lokhova says she was taken aback by Andrew’s article. For one, Andrew had not told her that he would be writing the article even though they were in frequent contact. At the time, Lokhova and Andrew were working together on a book based on Lokhova’s research of Soviet intelligence archives. Andrew’s piece also contained clear sexual undertones, including the suggestion that a Russian student (Lokhova) had “charmed” Flynn.

Reporters came out of the woodworks following Andrew’s story, says Lokhova.

Emails seen by TheDCNF show she was contacted by Washington Post columnist David Ignatius, who said he had been in contact with Andrew and wanted to speak to her during his planned visit to Cambridge. Ignatius would write a column May 22, 2018, defending Halper after he was outed as a government informant. A source familiar with Halper’s contacts with the Trump campaign has told TheDCNF he suggested the Trump campaign establish a relationship with Ignatius, who did not publish a story on Lokhova.

The Times also contacted Lokhova to inquire about Flynn, but the newspaper did not run a story about her or Flynn.

TheWSJ and Guardian, however, did publish articles.

Both reports, published in March 2017, suggested Flynn had failed to report his encounter with Lokhova to the Defense Intelligence Agency. But the real meat of the story was that U.S. intelligence officials had “serious concerns” about Flynn’s interaction with Lokhova.

The reports do not say whether those concerns were raised in 2014 or years later, but the timeline is important.

If Halper was concerned about Lokhova as early as 2014, why was she invited to his home two years later for dinner? Lokhova speculates that Halper intended to do what he did with Page and Papadopoulos. But if Halper waited until 2016 or later to raise concerns, was he truly worried about her contacts with Flynn?

As for the core allegations of the 2014 Cambridge event, Lokhova calls them “preposterous.”

She points to an email Andrew sent her April 19, 2017, to say he had told a Guardian reporter she was not a Russian asset.

“This material is quite sufficient to dispose of conspiracy theories about SL somehow serving some Russian interest,” Andrew wrote Lokhova in the email, which she provided to TheDCNF.

Lokhova notes the dinner Flynn attended was a small event and that all of the attendees had been vetted by DIA. Photos Lokhova provided to TheDCNF show she did not sit next to Flynn at the dinner, as the Journal’s sources claimed. Lokhova says she interacted with Flynn, but that others, including Dearlove and Andrew were close by. And though Lokhova was the only Russian at the dinner, most others Flynn met with were non-American. No stories were published suggesting that he had failed to report his contacts with a group made up largely of Brits.

Lokhova has also provided TheDCNF an email which showed she was invited by Cambridge officials to meet with Flynn’s predecessor, Gen. Vincent Stewart, on May 1, 2015. If Lokhova was a threat to Flynn, why would she not have been a threat to his successor, she wonders.

Andrew, Dearlove and Halper have avoided comment. Cambridge reportedly instructed faculty to avoid discussing the topic because of its sensitive nature.

https://dailycaller.com/2019/04/04/cambridge-halper-flynn-spygate/

[DarrinS]

Cringefest


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YZ9kiJ88LM

[Spurs Homer]

^ rooting for russians

[TSA]

1114308512241410049

What’s up with your girl peddling lies Winehole23?

[TSA]

The Russian collusion hoax meets unbelievable end

As the Russia collusion hoax hurtles toward its demise, it’s important to consider how this destructive information operation rampaged through vital American institutions for more than two years, and what can be done to stop such a damaging episode from recurring.

While the hoax was fueled by a wide array of false accusations, misleading leaks of ostensibly classified information, and bad-faith investigative actions by government officials, one vital element was indispensable to the overall operation: the Steele dossier.

Funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democrat National Committee, which hid their payments from disclosure by funneling them through the law firm Perkins Coie, the dossier was a collection of false and often absurd accusations of collusion between Trump associates and Russian officials. These allegations, which relied heavily on Russian sources cultivated by Christopher Steele, were spoon-fed to Trump opponents in the U.S. government, including officials in law enforcement and intelligence.

The efforts to feed the dossier’s allegations into top levels of the U.S. government, particularly intelligence agencies, were championed by Steele, Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson, and various intermediaries. These allegations were given directly to the FBI and Justice Department, while similar allegations were fed into the State Department by long-time Clinton aide Sidney Blumenthal.

Their efforts were remarkably effective. Officials within the FBI and DOJ, whether knowingly or unintentionally, provided essential support to the hoax conspirators, bypassing normal procedures and steering the information away from those who would view it critically. The dossier soon metastasized within the government, was cloaked in secrecy, and evaded serious scrutiny.

High-ranking officials such as then-FBI general counsel James Baker and then-Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr were among those whose actions advanced the hoax. Ohr, one of the most senior officials within the DOJ, took the unprecedented step of providing to Steele a back door into the FBI investigation. This enabled the former British spy to continue to feed information to investigators, even though he had been terminated by the FBI for leaking to the press and was no longer a valid source. Even worse, Ohr directly briefed Andrew Weissmann and Zainab Ahmad, two DOJ officials who were later assigned to special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation. In short, the investigation was marked by glaring irregularities that would normally be deemed intolerable.

According to Ohr’s congressional testimony, he told top-level FBI officials as early as August or September 2016 that Steele was biased against Trump, that Steele’s work was connected to the Clinton campaign, and that Steele's material was of questionable reliability. Steele himself confirmed that last point in a British court case in which he acknowledged his allegations included unverified information. Yet even after this revelation, intelligence leaders continued to cite the Steele dossier in applications to renew the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

It is astonishing that intelligence leaders did not immediately recognize they were being manipulated in an information operation or understand the danger that the dossier could contain deliberate disinformation from Steele’s Russian sources. In fact, it is impossible to believe in light of everything we now know about the FBI’s conduct of this investigation, including the astounding level of anti-Trump animus shown by high-level FBI figures like Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, as well as the inspector general’s discovery of a shocking number of leaks by FBI officials.

It’s now clear that top intelligence officials were perfectly well aware of the dubiousness of the dossier, but they embraced it anyway because it justified actions they wanted to take — turning the full force of our intelligence agencies first against a political candidate and then against a sitting president.

The hoax itself was a gift to our nation’s adversaries, most notably Russia. The abuse of intelligence for political purposes is insidious in any democracy. It undermines trust in democratic institutions, and it damages the reputation of the brave men and women who are working to keep us safe. This unethical conduct has had major repercussions on America’s body politic, creating a yearslong political crisis whose full effects remain to be seen.

Having extensively investigated this abuse, House Intelligence Committee Republicans will soon be submitting criminal referrals on numerous individuals involved in these matters. These people must be held to account to prevent similar abuses from occurring in the future. The men and women of our intelligence community perform an essential service defending American national security, and their ability to carry out their mission cannot be compromised by biased actors who seek to transform the intelligence agencies into weapons of political warfare.

Rep. Devin Nunes, a Republican, represents California's 22nd Congressional District. He is ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/rep-devin-nunes-the-russian-collusion-hoax-meets-unbelievable-end

Nunes was right all along while the rest of you slurped up Schiff’s shit

[spurraider21]

:lmao nunes op-ed

[TSA]

:lmao nunes op-ed

Care to refute anything or do you want to look like a dumbass again like when you laughed at the Nunes memo?

[spurraider21]

Care to refute anything or do you want to look like a dumbass again like when you laughed at the Nunes memo?
:lmao the memo

oh man i forgot about that nothingburger

[TSA]

:lmao the memo

oh man i forgot about that nothingburger

Nunes was dead on. You’re just embarrassing yourself now.

UNCLASSIFIED
Declassifed by order of the President
February 2, 2018

January 18, 2018
To: HPSCI Majority Members
From: HPSCI Majority Staff
Subject: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Abuses at the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation

Purpose

This memorandum provides Members an update on significant facts relating to the

Committee's ongoing investigation into the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and their use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (F ISA) during the 2016 presidential election cycle. Our findings, which are detailed below, 1) raise concerns with the legitimacy and legality of certain DOJ and FBI interactions with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), and 2) represent a troubling breakdown of legal processes established to protect the American people from abuses related to the ISA process.

Investigation Update

On October 21, 2016, DOJ and FBI sought and received a ISA probable cause order (not under Title VII) authorizing electronic surveillance on Carter Page from the FISC. Page is a US citizen who served as a volunteer advisor to the Trump presidential campaign. Consistent with requirements under FISA, the application had to be first certified by the Director or Deputy Director of the FBI. It then required the approval of the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General (DAG), or the Senate-confirmed Assistant Attorney General for the National Security Division.

The FBI and DOJ obtained one initial FISA warrant targeting Carter Page and three FISA renewals from the FISC. As required by statute (50 U.S.C. §1805(d)(1)), a FISA order on an American citizen must be renewed by the FISC every 90 days and each renewal requires a separate finding of probable cause. Then-Director James Comey signed three FISA applications in question on behalf of the FBI, and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe signed one. Sally Yates, then-Acting DAG Dana Boente, and DAG Rod Rosenstein each signed one or more FISA applications on behalf of DOJ.

Due to the sensitive nature of foreign intelligence activity, FISA submissions (including renewals) before the FISC are classified. As such, the public's confidence in the integrity of the FISA process depends on the court's ability to hold the government to the highest standard— particularly as it relates to surveillance of American citizens. However, the rigor in protecting the rights of Americans, which is reinforced by 90-day renewals of surveillance orders, is necessarily dependent on the government's production to the court of all material and relevant facts. This should include information potentially favorable to the target of the FISA application that is known by the government. In the case of Carter Page, the government had at least four independent opportunities before the FISC to accurately provide an accounting of the relevant facts. However, our findings indicate that, as described below, material and relevant information was omitted.

1) The "dossier" compiled by Christopher Steele (Steele dossier) on behalf of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Hillary Clinton campaign formed an essential part of the Carter Page FISA application. Steele was a longtime FBI source who was paid over $160,000 by the DNC and Clinton campaign, via the law firm Perkins Coie and research firm Fusion GPS, to obtain derogatory information on Donald Trump's ties to Russia.

a) Neither the initial application in October 2016, nor any of the renewals, disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign in funding Steele's efforts, even though the political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior and FBI officials.

b) The initial FISA application notes Steele was working for a named U.S. person, but does not name Fusion GPS and principal Glenn Simpson, who was paid by a U.S. law firm (Perkins Coie) representing the DNC (even though it was known by DOJ at the time that political actors were involved with the Steele dossier). The application does not mention Steele was ultimately working on behalf of—and paid by—the DNC and Clinton campaign, or that the FBI had separately authorized payment to Steele for the same information.

2) The Carter Page FISA application also cited extensively a September 23, 2016, Yahoo News article by Michael Isikoff, which focuses on Page's July 2016 trip to Moscow. This article does not corroborate the Steele dossier because it is derived from information leaked by Steele himself to Yahoo News. The Page FISA application incorrectly assesses that Steele did not directly provide information to Yahoo News. Steele has admitted in British court filings that he met with Yahoo News—and several other outlets—in September 2016 at the direction of Fusion GPS. Perkins Coie was aware of Steele's initial media contacts because they hosted at least one meeting in Washington D.C. in 2016 with Steele and Fusion GPS where this matter was discussed.

a) Steele was suspended and then terminated as an FBI source for what the FBI defines as the most serious of violations—an unauthorized disclosure to the media of his relationship with the FBI in an October 30, 2016, Mother Jones article by David Corn. Steele should have been terminated for his previous undisclosed contacts with Yahoo and other outlets in September—before the Page application was submitted to the FISC in October—but Steele improperly concealed from and lied to the FBI about those contacts.

b) Steele's numerous encounters with the media violated the cardinal rule of source handling—maintaining confidentiality—and demonstrated that Steele had become a less than reliable source for the FBI.

3) Before and after Steele was terminated as a source, he maintained contact with DOJ via then-Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr, a senior DOJ official who worked closely with Deputy Attorneys General Yates and later Rosenstein. Shortly after the election, the FBI began interviewing Ohr, documenting his communications with Steele. For example, in September 2016, Steele admitted to Ohr his feelings against then-candidate Trump when Steele said he "was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not, being president." This clear evidence of Steele's bias was recorded by Ohr at the time and subsequently in official FBI files—but not reflected in any of the Page FISA applications.

a) During this same time period, Ohr's wife was employed by Fusion GPS to assist in the cultivation of opposition research on Trump. Ohr later provided the FBI with all of his wife's opposition research, paid for by the DNC and Clinton campaign via Fusion GPS. The Ohrs' relationship with Steele and Fusion GPS was inexplicably concealed from the FISC.

4) According to the head of the FBI's counterintelligence division, Assistant Director Bill Priestap, corroboration of the Steele dossier was in its "infancy" at the time of the initial Page FISA application. After Steele was terminated, a source validation report conducted by an independent unit within FBI assessed Steele's reporting as only minimally corroborated. Yet, in early January 2017, Director Comey briefed President-elect Trump on a summary of the Steele dossier, even though it was—according to his June 2017 testimony—"salacious and unverified." While the FISA application relied on Steele's past record of credible reporting on other unrelated matters, it ignored or concealed his anti-Trump financial and ideological motivations. Furthermore, Deputy Director McCabe testified before the Committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISC without the Steele dossier information.

5) The Page FISA application also mentions information regarding fellow Trump campaign advisor George Papadopoulos, but there is no evidence of any cooperation or conspiracy between Page and Papadopoulos. The Papadopoulos information triggered the opening of an FBI counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016 by FBI agent Pete Strzok. Strzok was reassigned by the Special Counsel's Office to FBI Human Resources for improper text messages with his mistress, FBI Attorney Lisa Page (no known relation to Carter Page), where they both demonstrated a clear bias against Trump and in favor of Clinton, whom Strzok had also investigated. The Strzok/Lisa Page texts also reflect extensive discussions about the investigation, orchestrating leaks to the media, and include a meeting with Deputy Director McCabe to discuss an "insurance" policy against President Trump's election.

[spurraider21]

yup. nothingburger. its just whining coming from him.

im content to wait on the horowitz report

[TSA]

yup. nothingburger. its just whining coming from him.

im content to wait on the horowitz report

How is stating facts (which were laughed at at the time) whining?

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/FullMeasureNews/status/1114256761190535168

Herr Graham

[DarrinS]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UI7a1f9osGw

[AaronY]

RIP my niggah djohn gone too soon

https://2488hughes.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/pour-one-out.jpg

[AaronY]

Shoutout to djohn's mom here at 38 seconds or so

VMYAEHE2GrM

Keep your chin up girl..it'll get better. Tomorrow nother day, etc.

[Winehole23]

1114308512241410049

What’s up with your girl peddling lies Winehole23?That particular lie, as you call it, is a question to be settled in Roger Stone's ongoing trial. The failure to find Stone guilty beyind a reasoable doubt would no more be an exoneration of Stone than it would convict Marcy Wheeler of a lie.

I see the Barr cover letter for the Mueller report has emboldened to call out others as veracity challenged while recycling a rash of latent conspiracies that are all about as likely as the ones you denounce.

The silver lining is that we'll get to see you go down in flames. Again.

[TSA]

That particular lie, as you call it, is a question to be settled in Roger Stone's ongoing trial. The failure to find Stone guilty beyind a reasoable doubt would no more be an exoneration of Stone than it would convict Marcy Wheeler of a lie.

I see the Barr cover letter for the Mueller report has emboldened to call out others as veracity challenged while recycling a rash of latent conspiracies that are all about as likely as the ones you denounce.

The silver lining is that we'll get to see you go down in flames. Again.

The question was already settled when Mueller revealed there was no coordination with Wikileaks in Corsi’s Statement of Offense. Now that that’s settled why do you think your girl is clinging to a debunked conspiracy theory and still pushing lies?

[Spurs Homer]

The question was already settled when Mueller revealed there was no coordination with Wikileaks in Corsi’s Statement of Offense. Now that that’s settled why do you think your girl is clinging to a debunked conspiracy theory and still pushing lies?


The moron with the "wrong about pizzagate"


:rollin:rollin:rollin


too fucking rich!

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1114577724859805696

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1114577724859805696Should have told the FBI when it happened. They would've straightened it all out and you wouldn't be a convicted felon.

[Spurtacular]

Should have told the FBI when it happened. They would've straightened it all out and you wouldn't be a convicted felon.

:cry Trust the deep state :cry

:lmao

[Pavlov]

:cry Trust the deep state :cry

:lmaoHe's a convicted felon because he didn't go to the FBI and instead lied to them.

Sorry, derp.

[koriwhat]

Cringefest


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YZ9kiJ88LM

those type of people need to all be in a padded locked room.

btw, flynn is going to get a pardon soon enough and i can't wait to see all the losers cry some more.

[Pavlov]

those type of people need to all be in a padded locked room.

btw, flynn is going to get a pardon soon enough and i can't wait to see all the losers cry some more.I might've cared had Flynn been pardoned before he cooperated with Mueller's team -- but he gave up everything they asked of him so it won't change anything at all.

[koriwhat]

I might've cared had Flynn been pardoned before he cooperated with Mueller's team -- but he gave up everything they asked of him so it won't change anything at all.

he gave up what? that trump didn't collude? hahahahaha!

[Pavlov]

he gave up what? that trump didn't collude? hahahahaha!He cooperated fully and admitted his guilt.

I can't ask for anything more.

Sorry, kori.

[Chris]

he gave up what? that trump didn't collude? hahahahaha!

He gave up EVERYTHING.

:lol Russian conspiracy truther Pavlov

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1114642873608069120

[Pavlov]

He gave up EVERYTHING.

:lol Russian conspiracy truther PavlovEverything asked of him.

Are you somehow disputing this, Chris?

[koriwhat]

He cooperated fully and admitted his guilt.

I can't ask for anything more.

Sorry, kori.

you're clueless and you know it. you're like a fat ugly chick with a bad attitude; you got nothing to offer!

[Pavlov]

you're clueless and you know it. you're like a fat ugly chick with a bad attitude; you got nothing to offer!Tell me what I got wrong here.

1) Flynn admitted his guilt.

2) Flynn cooperated fully with the feds as part of his plea deal.

Let's discuss.

[Chris]

you're clueless and you know it. you're like a fat ugly chick with a bad attitude; you got nothing to offer!

https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia1.tenor.com%2Fimages%2F4afa3 94b4cb586ab7a21dc9c9d54c69f%2Ftenor.gif%3Fitemid%3 D11690415&f=1

[Pavlov]

https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia1.tenor.com%2Fimages%2F4afa3 94b4cb586ab7a21dc9c9d54c69f%2Ftenor.gif%3Fitemid%3 D11690415&f=1Oh, a meme.

I'll try it out on you since kori won't discuss.

1) Flynn pleaded guilty.

2) Flynn cooperated fully with the feds as part of his plea deal.

What did I get wrong?

[koriwhat]

Tell me what I got wrong here.

1) Flynn admitted his guilt.

2) Flynn cooperated fully with the feds as part of his plea deal.

Let's discuss.

everything's so black and white, right? no grey area in sight...

you'd cooperate too when your family is held hostage, your financial future is crumbling, your reputation is spit on, and you're being told you might face life in prison for a lie that originally wasn't said to be as such by the very people who interviewed you.

you acting like politics is basketball is pure stupidity but keep cheerleading if you must.

[Pavlov]

everything's so black and white, right? no grey area in sight...

you'd cooperate too when your family is held hostage, your financial future is crumbling, your reputation is spit on, and you're being told you might face life in prison for a lie that originally wasn't said to be as such by the very people who interviewed you.

you acting like politics is basketball is pure stupidity but keep cheerleading if you must.I'll try again:

1) Flynn admitted his guilt.

2) Flynn cooperated fully with the feds as part of his plea deal.

What did I get wrong?

[koriwhat]

I'll try again:

1) Flynn admitted his guilt.

2) Flynn cooperated fully with the feds as part of his plea deal.

What did I get wrong?

you got everything wrong... you don't even come correct with the setup from the get go at that luncheon between flynn and the woman he was to have had private conversations with.

shit's about to get real for you and a bunch of other losers.

QO32yKFc2IA

[Pavlov]

you got everything wrong... you don't even come correct with the setup from the get go at that luncheon between flynn and the woman he was to have had private conversations with.

shit's about to get real for you and a bunch of other losers.

QO32yKFc2IAYou didn't answer the question:

I'll try again:

1) Flynn admitted his guilt.

2) Flynn cooperated fully with the feds as part of his plea deal.

What did I get wrong?

Conspiracy videos don't change facts.

[koriwhat]

You didn't answer the question:

I'll try again:

1) Flynn admitted his guilt.

2) Flynn cooperated fully with the feds as part of his plea deal.

What did I get wrong?

Conspiracy videos don't change facts.

you're a cheerleader so just own it. you're weak mentally and this isn't news to me that you cheerlead blindly. own it!

[Pavlov]

you're a cheerleader so just own it. you're weak mentally and this isn't news to me that you cheerlead blindly. own it!1) Flynn admitted his guilt.

2) Flynn cooperated fully with the feds as part of his plea deal.

You can't say he didn't.

lol kori

[koriwhat]

1) Flynn admitted his guilt.

2) Flynn cooperated fully with the feds as part of his plea deal.

You can't say he didn't.

lol kori

i said he did so what are you harping on exactly? dealing with you is equivalent to dealing with a child. why don't you just go ahead and repeat yourself again and again like always.

[Pavlov]

i said he did:lmao no you didn't.

[koriwhat]

:lmao no you didn't.

"you'd cooperate too" i see you can't read between the lines that well your majesty.

[Pavlov]

"you'd cooperate too" i see you can't read between the lines that well your majesty.You buried it all in your conspiratorial whining.

lol kori

[Chris]

Russian truther Pavlov accusing other people of conspiracy theories. :lol

[Pavlov]

Russian truther Pavlov accusing other people of conspiracy theories. :lol
I'll try again with you:

1) Flynn admitted his guilt.

2) Flynn cooperated fully with the feds as part of his plea deal.

What did I get wrong?

[koriwhat]

everything's so black and white, right? no grey area in sight...

you'd cooperate too when your family is held hostage, your financial future is crumbling, your reputation is spit on, and you're being told you might face life in prison for a lie that originally wasn't said to be as such by the very people who interviewed you.

you acting like politics is basketball is pure stupidity but keep cheerleading if you must.



You buried it all in your conspiratorial whining.

lol kori

so buried... you're not genuine at all but you are a pussy.

[koriwhat]

Russian truther Pavlov accusing other people of conspiracy theories. :lol

ain't that some shit, right? these fucks on the left are so out of their league but we're all the retards... it's too funny.

[Chris]

ain't that some shit, right? these fucks on the left are so out of their league but we're all the retards... it's too funny.

It's 2+ years of MUH RUSSIA talkin'.

Just let them get it out of their systems poor sods.

[koriwhat]

It's 2+ years of MUH RUSSIA talkin'.

Just let them get it out of their systems poor sods.

but alex jones is the crazy one! haha

he's a bit crazy from what i see on JRE but not pav crazy... at least AJ is still a man unlike that feMALE named pav.

[Pavlov]

It's 2+ years of MUH RUSSIA talkin'.

Just let them get it out of their systems poor sods.This is a troll post.

[Pavlov]

so buried... you're not genuine at all but you are a pussy.
Buried.

You could have just admitted I was right all along without whining your ass off.

[koriwhat]

Buried.

You could have just admitted I was right all along without whining your ass off.

you were wrong and it wasn't buried in the least. you're just a weak pos trying to spin shit to make your bitchass look good but you never look like anything other than the weak pos that you are pav.

you chumpdumping faggot!

[Pavlov]

you were wrongWhich part was wrong?

1) Flynn admitted his guilt.

2) Flynn cooperated fully with the feds as part of his plea deal.

[koriwhat]

Which part was wrong?

1) Flynn admitted his guilt.

2) Flynn cooperated fully with the feds as part of his plea deal.

lmao you going back to this is proving my point exactly when you know this isn't the issue... we went over this bs.

you're not a genuine dude just like you're no real man to begin with.

[Pavlov]

lmao you going back to this is proving my point exactly when you know this isn't the issue.It is exactly the issue because I brought it up.

I stated exactly why I am fine with Flynn's sentence and don't care if he's pardoned.

These are the reasons I don't care:

1) Flynn admitted his guilt.

2) Flynn cooperated fully with the feds as part of his plea deal.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1114694140518903808

[Spurs Homer]

lmao you going back to this is proving my point exactly when you know this isn't the issue... we went over this bs.

you're not a genuine dude just like you're no real man to begin with.

You are making DUCKS

look like a fucking genius


:lol:lol

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/OfficeOfMike/status/1114895735286325248

[koriwhat]

You are making DUCKS

look like a fucking genius


:lol:lol

everyone is a genius when compared to your retarded ass. :tu

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/1115029742703525888

/thread?

[koriwhat]

https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/1115029742703525888

/thread?

i posted her video just for pav to call it a conspiracy theory video and dismiss it. see how genuine pavTheFag is?

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/1115029742703525888

/thread?:lol that wasn't what he pleaded guilty to.

[koriwhat]

:lol that wasn't what he pleaded guilty to.

he pleaded guilty to lying... a technicality that came from the whole witchhunt. prior, the memo by the fbi agents, claimed otherwise! you're just not a genuine person pav and you want the worst for this country so when your day is up and the clock runs out on you this world will be a better place for it and especially this country.

[Pavlov]

he pleaded guilty to lying... a technicality that came from the whole witchhunt. prior, the memo by the fbi agents, claimed otherwise! you're just not a genuine person pav and you want the worst for this country so when your day is up and the clock runs out on you this world will be a better place for it and especially this country.lol sissy kori wishing death again

[koriwhat]

lol sissy kori wishing death again

did i wish death or do you have a problem with reading comprehension? i said, when the day comes it should be celebrated. you're a retard and thanks for confirming it. :tu

[Pavlov]

did i wish death or do you have a problem with reading comprehension? i said, when the day comes it should be celebrated. you're a retard and thanks for confirming it. :tu:lol sissy kori wanting to celebrate a message board poster's death

[koriwhat]

:lol sissy kori wanting to celebrate a message board poster's death

oh i would in a heartbeat! one less pos like you in this world would be a blessing.

btw, you were wrong again... reading comprehension! i was right you fucking faux intellectual!

[Pavlov]

oh i would in a heartbeat! one less pos like you in this world would be a blessing.:lol sissy kori can't stand being proved wrong.

Sorry, sissy -- just quit being wrong all the time.

[koriwhat]

:lol sissy kori can't stand being proved wrong.

Sorry, sissy -- just quit being wrong all the time.

wrong about what? i just have a fucking child, you, following me around in every god damn thread acting like the bitch that you are. did i say anything that's not factual in this post?

[Pavlov]

wrong about what?What Flynn pleaded guilty to.

The refugee laws of the United States of America.

Claiming you don't wish death on posters.

[koriwhat]

What Flynn pleaded guilty to.

The refugee laws of the United States of America.

Claiming you don't wish death on posters.

did i lie about flynn? what was the lie?

did i lie about the refugee laws or did i make a statement about how i felt? you're such a fool!

did i wish death on you a minute ago? again, you're a fucking retard twisting things but if you were to cease to exist i'd applaud it!

[Pavlov]

did i lie about flynn? what was the lie?

did i lie about the refugee laws or did i make a statement about how i felt? you're such a fool!

did i wish death on you a minute ago? again, you're a fucking retard twisting things but if you were to cease to exist i'd applaud it!:lmao there you go again.

You were wrong about all those things.

Just own it.

[koriwhat]

:lmao there you go again.

You were wrong about all those things.

Just own it.

and yet you can't back your claim up... :lmao there you go again. You were wrong about all those things. Just own it.

[Pavlov]

and yet you can't back your claim up.:lol I just did.

[Spurs Homer]

https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/1115029742703525888

/thread?

OK-

we are taking "russians"

word as truth now!

[boutons_deux]

Did Russia meddle in Magadascar's election?

A BBC investigation has revealed that

at least six candidates were offered money by Russians in the lead up to last year’s presidential elections in Madagascar.

The presence of Russian political strategists with close ties to the Kremlin,

posing as tourists with the alleged aim of helping to control the tightly fought race,

has raised questions whether democracy in the former French colony has been fatally compromised.

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-africa-47830161/did-russia-meddle-in-magadascar-s-election (https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-africa-47830161/did-russia-meddle-in-magadascar-s-election)

[Chris]

Looks like AG Barr will lead the investigation. No special counsel.

[ChumpDumper]

Looks like AG Barr will lead the investigation. No special counsel.Link?

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1115417163068780546

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1115417163068780546Flynn was a blackmail target and security risk.

Should never have been appointed.

[Chris]

Flynn was a blackmail target and security risk.

Should never have been appointed.

Sure thing pal.