Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[djohn2oo8]

Trump fans celebrating his Nixonian behavior and demands seems... odd. Wouldn't seem to be a harbinger of good things for them.

It's not. I just hope they have the nerve to show their face when it's over

[Chris]

It's not. I just hope they have the nerve to show their face when it's over

What's going to happen?

[Chris]

998660562925113345

[Spurminator]

What's going to happen?

What's going to happen is you're going to ignore the results if you don't like them.

And you're going to keep embarrassing yourself by revealing to everyone, multiple times per day, that you allow your views to be manipulated by people who rely on really stupid people for an audience.

[TSA]

He's away from the board altogether for long stretches, but if your notebook says different.

But I keep coming back to this in my mind: Why did no one in the Dennison campaign ever tell the FBI about contacts with Russians especially after the FBI warned them about what the Russians were doing?

The article you are referencing was written by none other than Fusion GPS mouthpiece Ken Dilanian.

"By the time of the warning in late July or August, at least seven Trump campaign officials had been in contact with Russians or people linked to Russia, according to public reports. There is no public evidence that the campaign reported any of that to the FBI"


Which campaign officials had contacts with Russians or people linked to Russia after the August 17th counterintelligence briefing?

[Pavlov]

The article you are referencing was written by none other than Fusion GPS mouthpiece Ken Dilanian.

"By the time of the warning in late July or August, at least seven Trump campaign officials had been in contact with Russians or people linked to Russia, according to public reports. There is no public evidence that the campaign reported any of that to the FBI"


Which campaign officials had contacts with Russians or people linked to Russia after the August 17th counterintelligence briefing?Sorry, there is a question pending you need to answer:

Why did no one in the Dennison campaign ever tell the FBI about contacts with Russians especially after the FBI warned them about what the Russians were doing?

That means they should have told them before the briefing, TSA.

[Chris]

Sorry, there is a question pending you need to answer:

Why did no one in the Dennison campaign ever tell the FBI about contacts with Russians especially after the FBI warned them about what the Russians were doing?

He's asking for specifics so he can answer honestly. Are you unaware of the specifics or just too lazy to research them?

[Pavlov]

He's asking for specifics so he can answer honestly. Are you unaware of the specifics or just too lazy to research them?Numerous contacts had already taken place and they already should have told the FBI.

Why did no one in the Dennison campaign ever tell the FBI about contacts with Russians especially after the FBI warned them about what the Russians were doing?

[Reck]

Rent free

Hardly.

You're just an easily identifiable person to point to as an example of someone who never has an original take.

[djohn2oo8]

Gotta love that FBI plant a spy theory dead already

[Chris]

Numerous contacts had already taken place and they already should have told the FBI.

Why did no one in the Dennison campaign ever tell the FBI about contacts with Russians especially after the FBI warned them about what the Russians were doing?

How often should the Trump campaign report in with the FBI? Weekly,bi-weekly, daily???

[RandomGuy]

Numerous contacts had already taken place and they already should have told the FBI.

Why did no one in the Dennison campaign ever tell the FBI about contacts with Russians especially after the FBI warned them about what the Russians were doing?

Because they were slimy idiots who were probably coordinating with the Russian government?

Just spitballing.

[Spurminator]

How often should the Trump campaign report in with the FBI? Weekly,bi-weekly, daily???

You sure you want your argument to be that they may have had so many interactions with Russian officials that they couldn't possibly report every one?

[Chris]

Was there an obligation for them to report in to the FBI for the alleged Russian coordination? Can you explain that to me.

[RandomGuy]

How often should the Trump campaign report in with the FBI? Weekly,bi-weekly, daily???

Every time they meet with people that the FBI warns them about. It's not difficult.

[Pavlov]

How often should the Trump campaign report in with the FBI? Weekly,bi-weekly, daily???Whenever Russian agents offer to interfere with US elections tbh. They're in the phone book.

[djohn2oo8]

Was there an obligation for them to report in to the FBI for the alleged Russian coordination? Can you explain that to me.

Yes. The FBI warned them what the Russians were up to and to notify them of such interaction or attempts. They did not.

[TSA]

Sorry, there is a question pending you need to answer:

Why did no one in the Dennison campaign ever tell the FBI about contacts with Russians especially after the FBI warned them about what the Russians were doing?You don't know the FBI was never contacted, Fusion GPS mouthpiece Ken Dilanian told you that because he couldn't find public evidence that the campaign reported any of that to the FBI.

I'm trying to get you to clarify which campaign officials you are talking about and whether they occurred before or after the FBI warning. So which campaign officials had contacts with Russians or people linked to Russia after the August 17th counterintelligence briefing?

[TSA]

Every time they meet with people that the FBI warns them about. It's not difficult.

Which campaign officials had contacts with Russians or people linked to Russia after the August 17th counterintelligence briefing?

[Pavlov]

Was there an obligation for them to report in to the FBI for the alleged Russian coordination? Can you explain that to me.If they are patriots of course they are obligated.

If they don't give a shit about the United States of America, they can collude all they want. But that won't stop the FBI from investigating.

[TSA]

Yes. The FBI warned them what the Russians were up to and to notify them of such interaction or attempts. They did not.

Which campaign officials had contacts with Russians or people linked to Russia after the August 17th counterintelligence briefing?

[Pavlov]

You don't know the FBI was never contacted, Fusion GPS mouthpiece Ken Dilanian told you that because he couldn't find public evidence that the campaign reported any of that to the FBI.So your new theory is the Dennison campaign did inform the FBI about every contact with Russians?

Really?

Why did they lie about them later?

[Chris]

If they are patriots of course they are obligated.

If they don't give a shit about the United States of America, they can collude all they want. But that won't stop the FBI from investigating.

There was no collusion so why is the FBI investigating?

[Pavlov]

There was no collusion so why is the FBI investigating?The FBI was investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election Chris.

Why did no one in the Dennison campaign ever tell the FBI about contacts with Russians especially after the FBI warned them about what the Russians were doing?

[Pavlov]

TSA, why didn't Jr. notify the FBI about the "adoptions" meeting as soon as it was proposed?

Why didn't Manfort or Kushner go to the FBI directly after they found out about it?

[Pavlov]

Why didn't Papadopoulos go straight to the FBI with his story about Russians and emails?

[TSA]

TSA, why didn't Jr. notify the FBI about the "adoptions" meeting as soon as it was proposed?

Why didn't Manfort or Kushner go to the FBI directly after they found out about it?

Was the adoptions meeting before or after the counterintelligence briefing?

[TSA]

Why didn't Papadopoulos go straight to the FBI with his story about Russians and emails?

:lol seriously?

[djohn2oo8]

Was the adoptions meeting before or after the counterintelligence briefing?

Why did Jr say the meeting was about adoptions? That was obviously a lie

[Pavlov]

Was the adoptions meeting before or after the counterintelligence briefing?Before.

Are you saying they were all just naive babes who didn't know that would be of interest to the Federal Bureau of Investigation?


:lol seriously?Are you saying he was just a naive babe who didn't know that would be of interest to the Federal Bureau of Investigation?'

State your narrative.

[Chris]

998683564039286785

[Pavlov]

998683564039286785Carter Page who was recruited by the Russians and was suspected of tipping off the Russians that the FBI was onto them?

That guy?

[Spurminator]

So now your standard for association is when people happen to attend the same event?

How embarrassing it must be to reach this hard.

[Pavlov]

Was the adoptions meeting before or after the counterintelligence briefing?


The FBI will investigate any suspected foreign intelligence contact, and can legally use assets to do so. Offering a briefing in which they don't disclose what they already know to be true 1) is consistent w a classified investigation and 2) offers an opp for ppl to come clean.

Further, if I believe someone is assisting a hostile foreign intelligence service but am not sure if they are doing so wittingly or unwittingly, the way I'd verify it is to say, "Hey, these people might be reaching out. Let us know if they do, here's my card."

An innocent person will immediately follow up and say, "Hey XYZ happened a few weeks ago." If they don't – and if they continue to have contacts without reporting – it's safe to conclude that they are participating "knowingly." Which is a key element for a FISA for an USPER.

https://twitter.com/AshaRangappa_/status/998603205981466628

[Spurminator]

https://img.thedailybeast.com/image/upload/c_crop,d_placeholder_euli9k,h_1439,w_2560,x_0,y_0/dpr_2.0/c_limit,w_740/fl_lossy,q_auto/v1492115397/articles/2016/03/17/the-wedding-that-explains-the-election/160316-daly-trump-clinton-tease_dpubuo
(American Flag Avatar Twitter guy): DOES THIS PHOTO LINK HILLARY CLINTON AND MELANIA TRUMP IN A POSSIBLE COLLUSION EFFORT???

(Retweeted by Citizen X)

[Chris]

998681535996940288

[djohn2oo8]

998681535996940288

Sorry Chris. Trump's own team hired him.

[Chris]

Sorry Chris. Trump's own team hired him.

Looks like he snuck in there claiming to be an Asian ambassador.

“Recommending outside policy experts for roles within the administration is a pretty typical and routine action for White House officials."

Of course this was just for Trump's protection right?

[djohn2oo8]

Looks like he snuck in there claiming to be an Asian ambassador.

“Recommending outside policy experts for roles within the administration is a pretty typical and routine action for White House officials."

Of course this was just for Trump's protection right?

Trump's own adviser recommended him. Sorry Chris.

[Chris]

998646847827824645

[Pavlov]

998646847827824645:lol Is he still pushing #Obamagate?

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/AshaRangappa_/status/998603205981466628


An innocent person will immediately follow up and say, "Hey XYZ happened a few weeks ago." If they don't – and if they continue to have contacts without reporting – it's safe to conclude that they are participating "knowingly." Which is a key element for a FISA for an USPER.

So which campaign officials had contacts with Russians or people linked to Russia after the August 17th counterintelligence briefing?

[Pavlov]

So which campaign officials had contacts with Russians or people linked to Russia after the August 17th counterintelligence briefing?Probably no direct contact since the FBI told them they were investigating it. There are certainly ways around that.

I don't think they're THAT stupid.

You never answered this tho:

Why did they lie about and conceal Russian contacts after the briefing? Wouldn't have just been better to tell the public "Yeah they tried but we shut them down! USA! USA!"?

Instead a year later it was found out and they say, "Yeah, we tried to collude with Russian agents but they didn't have good enough dirt on Clinton."

This is who you support.

[Spurminator]

Probably no direct contact since the FBI told them they were investigating it. There are certainly ways around that.

I don't think they're THAT stupid.


Probably why Kushner wanted to set up a direct line to the Kremlin.

[Pavlov]

Probably why Kushner wanted to set up a direct line to the Kremlin.Or maybe just leave it to someone peripheral to the campaign....

[DarrinS]

So now your standard for association is when people happen to attend the same event?

How embarrassing it must be to reach this hard.

same thing counted as interactions between Russians and Trump campaign

I agree with you. :lol

[TSA]

Probably no direct contact since the FBI told them they were investigating it.

Am I correct in saying that to your knowledge, and :lol “Ken’s public knowledge”, no Trump campaign officials had contacts with Russians or people linked to Russia after the August 17th counterintelligence briefing?

[Spurminator]

same thing counted as interactions between Russians and Trump campaign

When was that?

[djohn2oo8]

Am I correct in saying that to your knowledge, and :lol “Ken’s public knowledge”, no Trump campaign officials had contacts with Russians or people linked to Russia after the August 17th counterintelligence briefing?

They sure as hell had contact before. And did not report during or after the briefing. Biatchhhh :lol

[TSA]

996853981518364672

[Pavlov]

Am I correct in saying that to your knowledge, and :lol “Ken’s public knowledge”, no Trump campaign officials had contacts with Russians or people linked to Russia after the August 17th counterintelligence briefing?Sorry, you have a question pending:

Why did they lie about and conceal Russian contacts after the briefing? Wouldn't have just been better to tell the public "Yeah they tried but we shut them down! USA! USA!"?

[Pavlov]

996853981518364672How does a FISA warrant get renewed three times, TSA?

[TSA]

How is a guy who had multiple FISA warrants renewed still a free man? That’s a lot of new probable cause intel that turned up zero.

[Pavlov]

How is a guy who had multiple FISA warrants renewed still a free man? That’s a lot of new probable cause intel that turned up zero.On what date the the Mueller investigation end, TSA?

[TSA]

Sorry, you have a question pending:

Why did they lie about and conceal Russian contacts after the briefing? Wouldn't have just been better to tell the public "Yeah they tried but we shut them down! USA! USA!"?

Sorry, flow of the conversation holds more weight. Stop trying to steer it and avoid relevant questions to topics you bring up.

Am I correct in saying that to your knowledge, and “Ken’s public knowledge”, no Trump campaign officials had contacts with Russians or people linked to Russia after the August 17th counterintelligence briefing?

[Pavlov]

Sorry, flow of the conversation holds more weight. Stop trying to steer it and avoid relevant questions to topics you bring up.

Am I correct in saying that to your knowledge, and “Ken’s public knowledge”, no Trump campaign officials had contacts with Russians or people linked to Russia after the August 17th counterintelligence briefing?Dodge #2

Why did they lie about and conceal Russian contacts after the briefing? Wouldn't have just been better to tell the public "Yeah they tried but we shut them down! USA! USA!"?

:lol flow weight

Your excuses get weaker every time.

[TSA]

On what date the the Mueller investigation end, TSA?

You are still hoping Carter Page is going to be indicted for something

:lmao
:lmao
:lmao

[TSA]

Dodge #2

Why did they lie about and conceal Russian contacts after the briefing? Wouldn't have just been better to tell the public "Yeah they tried but we shut them down! USA! USA!"?

:lol flow weight

Your excuses get weaker every time.

No it’s typically how people converse. Instead of answering a question that makes you uncomfortable you toss out more questions to steer the conversation in a direction you want.

I will take your refusal to answer as a YES, you know of no Trump campaign officials had contacts with Russians or people linked to Russia after the August 17th counterintelligence briefing.

[Spurminator]

Sorry, flow of the conversation holds more weight. Stop trying to steer it and avoid relevant questions to topics you bring up.

Am I correct in saying that to your knowledge, and “Ken’s public knowledge”, no Trump campaign officials had contacts with Russians or people linked to Russia after the August 17th counterintelligence briefing?

Let's say the answer is yes. The question is still laughably arbitrary to anyone with a shred of intellectual honesty. If they came out of that meeting and lied about, or didn't disclose, previous contacts, they made a choice not to assist the IC in looking into foreign interference into the Presidential Campaign. There's no good reason for them to refuse to do so, and it reeks of having something to hide, especially when you consider all of the other smoke.

Pavlov's question is more relevant, which is probably why you won't answer it, just like you avoid everything else that doesn't work for the narrative bubble you've created. You're pathetic. :lol

[TSA]

Let's say the answer is yes. The question is still laughably arbitrary to anyone with a shred of intellectual honesty. If they came out of that meeting and lied about, or didn't disclose, previous contacts, they made a choice not to assist the IC in looking into foreign interference into the Presidential Campaign. There's no good reason for them to refuse to do so, and it reeks of having something to hide, especially when you consider all of the other smoke.

Pavlov's question is more relevant, which is probably why you won't answer it, just like you avoid everything else that doesn't work for the narrative bubble you've created. You're pathetic. :lol

If they came out of the meeting and lied to the FBI about it, why is nobody indicted for lying about it? Why is the meeting never mentioned in any indictments?

[Pavlov]

No it’s typically how people converse. Instead of answering a question that makes you uncomfortable you toss out more questions to steer the conversation in a direction you want.

I will take your refusal to answer as a YES, you know of no Trump campaign officials had contacts with Russians or people linked to Russia after the August 17th counterintelligence briefing.
I asked you first and you threw out more questions for the reasons you just mentioned.

Thank you for admitting how uncomfortable you were when asked a simple question.

[djohn2oo8]

If they came out of the meeting and lied to the FBI about it, why is nobody indicted for lying about it? Why is the meeting never mentioned in any indictments?
Well, is Mueller's investigation still running? If it is, door ain't closed on indictments son. Or do you think jail comes first?

[Pavlov]

If they came out of the meeting and lied to the FBI about it, why is nobody indicted for lying about it? Why is the meeting never mentioned in any indictments?No one said they lied to the FBI. They just didn't tell them anything about their contacs when they had the opportunity and really the patriotic obligation to do so.

[djohn2oo8]

No one said they lied to the FBI. They just didn't tell them anything about their contacs.

He is desperate and fearful.

[djohn2oo8]

Gonna be a sight to see when it is all over. TSA's bank account gonna be like "Djohn, I don't feel so good". And then evaporate into ashes.

[TSA]

I asked you first and you threw out more questions for the reasons you just mentioned.

Thank you for admitting how uncomfortable you were when asked a simple question.

Your initial question hinged on an article by Fusion GPS mouthpiece Ken Dilanian. I asked for clarification and when you refused I dismissed your follow ups.

[Spurminator]

No one said they lied to the FBI. They just didn't tell them anything about their contacs when they had the opportunity and really the patriotic obligation to do so.

That selective narrative bubble...

[TSA]

Well, is Mueller's investigation still running? If it is, door ain't closed on indictments son. Or do you think jail comes first?

Mueller’s investigation is still running. Do you want to double our bets on it yes or no?

[Pavlov]

Your initial question hinged on an article by Fusion GPS mouthpiece Ken Dilanian. I asked for clarification and when you refused I dismissed your follow ups.
Now you have a mouthpiece conspiracy.

[Pavlov]

Mueller’s investigation is still running. Do you want to double our bets on it yes or no?

lol muh bets

[djohn2oo8]

lol muh bets

The boy is begging.

[TSA]

The boy is begging.

Simple question djohn. Double the bets yes or no?

[Chris]

998741270934810624

[Mikeanaro]

More than 1000 pages wow, there must be some culosion I mean it cant be fake if there are so many dems claiming it happened.

[djohn2oo8]

More than 1000 pages wow, there must be some culosion I mean it cant be fake if there are so many dems claiming it happened.
Learn to spell it first. :lol

[djohn2oo8]

Simple question djohn. Double the bets yes or no?

Desperation is oozing from your pores. It stinks.

[Mikeanaro]

Learn to spell it first. :lol
Actually its pretty funny in spanish.

[Chris]

998735948358668288

[Chris]

998734690130563072

[djohn2oo8]

I still can't remember what Chris' last 500 tweets amounted to. Anybody?

[Pavlov]

998735948358668288
What's wrong with Horowitz?

[Pavlov]

998734690130563072So they didn't help Clinton.

lol

[Chris]

What's wrong with Horowitz?

Sure Pavlov, I will cliff notes the article for your question.



Fox News has learned the 12-page resolution will ask a second special counsel to probe matters related to three topics: The ending of the investigation into Hillary Clinton's personal email server, the progress of the Trump-Russia investigation from its origins through the appointment of Robert Mueller as special counsel, and abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) during the warrant application process.

The resolution is expected to say that a second special counsel would have greater autonomy to investigate those issues than the Justice Department's Office of the Inspector General. Last week, Inspector General Michael Horowitz told lawmakers that he had completed his draft report on the Clinton investigation and submitted it to the DOJ and the FBI.

[Chris]

So they didn't help Clinton.

lol

Delusional and shook. Lawdy!

[Chris]

998730906583085056

[Spurminator]

:lol Chris bragging about the GOP wanting a second opinion.

Things are going great!

[Chris]

Swalwell got Tucked. Will post shortly.

[djohn2oo8]

So they didn't help Clinton.

lol

He can't make up his mind

[djohn2oo8]

:lol Chris bragging about the GOP wanting a second opinion.

Things are going great!

He can post whatever. None of it clears Trump.

[Reck]

998735948358668288

Great, Chris.

This will make at least the 3rd time republicans do so. Maybe the third time is the charm? After all, they have been shut the fuck down the in prior ocassions. :lol

[Pavlov]

998730906583085056So that hurt Clinton.

[Pavlov]

Sure Pavlov, I will cliff notes the article for your question.

Why do they need more autonomy?

[DarrinS]

“President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities ‘by the book’. The President stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.”


Smh

[Pavlov]

“President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities ‘by the book’. The President stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.”


Smh
Why smh, Darrin?

Explain your snark for once.

[Reck]

Why smh, Darrin?

Explain your snark for once.

Muh russia. nuff said

[DarrinS]

Why smh, Darrin?

Explain your snark for once.

A totally normal email sent to herself on inauguration day, mentioning “by the book” twice. Hmm

[Pavlov]

A totally normal email sent to herself on inauguration day, mentioning “by the book” twice. Hmm
What is your conspiracy theory, Darrin?

[DarrinS]

drip drip

tick tock

[DarrinS]

What is your conspiracy theory, Darrin?

What is your conspiracy theory, Chump?

[Pavlov]

drip drip

tick tockFor what?

What are you talking about, Darrin?

[Pavlov]

What is your conspiracy theory, Chump?
I've already told you what I think, Darrin.

What is your conspiracy theory, Darrin?

[DarrinS]

I've already told you what I think, Darrin.

What is your conspiracy theory, Darrin?

You don’t even believe the Russia collusion conspiracy theory. :lol

Do you think this investigation was conducted “by the book”?

[Pavlov]

You don’t even believe the Russia collusion conspiracy theory. :lol

Do you think this investigation was conducted “by the book”?I told you exactly what I think, Darrin.

What is your conspiracy theory, Darrin?

[TSA]

I still can't remember what Chris' last 500 tweets amounted to. Anybody?

And yours?

[TSA]

Desperation is oozing from your pores. It stinks.

ddodge2oo8 on full tilt. Simple question djohn. Double the bets yes or no?

[DarrinS]

I told you exactly what I think, Darrin.

What is your conspiracy theory, Darrin?

I think the Obama admin abused their power to spy on their opponents’ campaign. They didn’t think anyone would notice because Hillary (ding) was supposed to win.

[TSA]

Swalwell got Tucked. Will post shortly.

Caught that. More pathetic than Schiff in the headlights interview.

[Chris]

998751515333550081

[Pavlov]

I think the Obama admin abused their power to spy on their opponents’ campaign. They didn’t think anyone would notice because Hillary (ding) was supposed to win.Why would they bother spying on the Dennison campaign for no reason if they thought Hillary would win?

And when did the administration make the decision to spy on the Dennison campaign?

[DarrinS]

Caught that. More pathetic than Schiff in the headlights interview.

Smallwell is a piss ant tho

[Pavlov]

Caught that. More pathetic than Schiff in the headlights interview.

:lol TSA watches Fox News

[DarrinS]

Why would they bother spying on the Dennison campaign for no reason if they thought Hillary would win?

And when did the administration make the decision to spy on the Dennison campaign?


Insurance policy

Second question is very interesting as it relates to the timeline. It will be investigated.

[Pavlov]

Insurance policy

Second question is very interesting as it relates to the timeline. It will be investigated.

Insurance policy they didn't use before the election.

:lol interesting question

Your conspiracy theory is non-existent

[monosylab1k]

Insurance policy

Second question is very interesting as it relates to the timeline. It will be investigated.

From “meh, I don’t care” to caring a whole fucking lot :lol nice change of schtick, this one feels honest tbh

[Chris]

DLnpcJeWrGo

[DarrinS]

Insurance policy they didn't use before the election.

:lol interesting question

Your conspiracy theory is non-existent


Pav doesn’t understand insurance policies. You don’t preemptively file claims.

They thought she (ding) would win.

[Pavlov]

From “meh, I don’t care” to caring a whole fucking lot :lol nice change of schtick, this one feels honest tbh
True. Should give him props for finally admitting what he is.

[Spurminator]

I think the Obama admin abused their power to spy on their opponents’ campaign. They didn’t think anyone would notice because Hillary (ding) was supposed to win.

If the FBI suspects a foreign adversary is attempting to influence a Presidential election with the assistance of one of the campaigns, do you want them to ignore it?

This isn't like Watergate where Nixon was looking for a strategic edge. This is potential hostile action by a foreign power. I would want that investigated regardless of who it benefitted, wouldn't you?

[DarrinS]

From “meh, I don’t care” to caring a whole fucking lot :lol nice change of schtick, this one feels honest tbh

What’s my post count?

You tards still conflate skepticism with apathy. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Pav doesn’t understand insurance policies. You don’t preemptively file claims.

They thought she (ding) would win.
:lol Darrin's conspiracy theory

[Pavlov]

What’s my post count?

You tards still conflate skepticism with apathy. :lmao
It's not skepticism. You're another conspiracy theorist.

[monosylab1k]

What’s my post count?

You tards still conflate skepticism with apathy. :lmao

“I cared the whole time!”

I appreciate that you’ve grown as a human and stopped lying to yourself.

[spurraider21]

A totally normal email sent to herself on inauguration day, mentioning “by the book” twice. Hmm
what do you think her email means?

i asked you this a couple of times the other day, too. no answer.

[DarrinS]

It's not skepticism. You're another conspiracy theorist.

Russia collusion with Trump is a conspiracy theory.

[DarrinS]

what do you think her email means?

i asked you this a couple of times the other day, too. no answer.

CYA

But, in hindsight, not helpful. :lol

[DarrinS]

If the FBI suspects a foreign adversary is attempting to influence a Presidential election with the assistance of one of the campaigns, do you want them to ignore it?

This isn't like Watergate where Nixon was looking for a strategic edge. This is potential hostile action by a foreign power. I would want that investigated regardless of who it benefitted, wouldn't you?

We’ll find out, eventually.

[Pavlov]

Russia collusion with Trump is a conspiracy theory.

I told you exactly my feelings on that.

:lol your conspiracy theory

[DarrinS]

I told you exactly my feelings on that.

:lol your conspiracy theory

Lol all you want. Truth will come out.

[spurraider21]

CYA

But, in hindsight, not helpful. :lol
you think an email to oneself covers their ass?

your honor, i'm not guilty... as proof, i have an email to myself.

you really think that's what the national security adviser thought she was doing?

[Pavlov]

We’ll find out, eventually.
Strategic edge by losing the election so they could go into Operation Insurance which is what?

[Spurminator]

We’ll find out, eventually.

What kind of strategic edge do you believe they were looking for, if you don't believe they were genuinely looking into foreign interference?

What information were they trying to gather by specifically targeting Russian/Trump Campaign contacts?

This is a pretty serious accusation, so I'm sure you have this thought out in detail.

[Pavlov]

Lol all you want. Truth will come out.

What truth are you saying will come out, Darrin?

Because your conspiracy theory doesn't make any sense.

[DarrinS]

What truth are you saying will come out, Darrin?

Because your conspiracy theory doesn't make any sense.


I realize that you try to pose this theory as a 9/11 truther or pizzagate conspiracy, but you know I’m neither of those.

[Pavlov]

I realize that you try to pose this theory as a 9/11 truther or pizzagate conspiracy, but you know I’m neither of those.You have a conspiracy theory, Darrin.

What truth are you saying will come out?

[DarrinS]

What kind of strategic edge do you believe they were looking for, if you don't believe they were genuinely looking into foreign interference?

What information were they trying to gather by specifically targeting Russian/Trump Campaign contacts?

This is a pretty serious accusation, so I'm sure you have this thought out in detail.


There’s a right and wrong way to do it.

A right way to establish Russian hacking of DNC is to seize the server, for example.

[DarrinS]

You have a conspiracy theory, Darrin.

What truth are you saying will come out?

Just THE truth

[Pavlov]

There’s a right and wrong way to do it.

A right way to establish Russian hacking of DNC is to seize the server, for example.
What's your conspiracy theory about that, Darrin?

[Chris]

BREAKING: E-mails Show FBI Brass Discussed Dossier Briefing Details With CNN


New e-mails show former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe was surprisingly knowledgeable about CNN's understanding of and deliberation about a dossier briefing given to Donald Trump days before CNN ever reported on the matter.



Newly revealed e-mails show that former Federal Bureau Investigation (FBI) deputy director Andrew McCabe was keenly aware of CNN’s internal understanding of a secret briefing about the infamous Steele dossier, days before CNN published any stories on the matter. The e-mails, which were obtained by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.), also reveal that top officials used coded language to refer to the salacious and unverified allegations made by Steele.

Former FBI director James Comey briefed then-President-Elect Donald Trump on January 6, 2017, on at least one unproven allegation contained in Steele’s dossier, which was jointly funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. CNN broke the story about the dossier briefing on January 10, 2017, touching off a firestorm of hysteria that culminated in not just the firing of Comey by Trump, but the eventual appointment of Department of Justice (DOJ) special counsel Robert Mueller.

Comey claimed that he was compelled to brief Trump on the dossier because “CNN had [it]” and was “looking for a news hook.”

Hours before Comey briefed Trump, FBI chief of staff James Rybicki e-mailed staff that Comey “is coming into HQ briefly now for an update from the sensitive matter team.” Just as the same officials dubbed the Clinton e-mail investigation the “mid-year exam” and the anti-Trump counterintelligence investigation “Crossfire Hurricane,” they also used various phrases using “sensitive” to refer obliquely to the dossier.

Two days after the briefing, on January 8, 2017, former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe, who earlier this year was fired and then referred for criminal prosecution by the DOJ inspector general for repeatedly lying about media leaks, wrote an e-mail to top FBI officials with the subject, “Flood is coming.”

“CNN is close to going forward with the sensitive story,” McCabe wrote to Comey, Rybicki, and two others. “The trigger for them is they know the material was discussed in the brief and presented in an attachment.” He did not detail how he came to know what CNN’s “trigger” was for publishing the dossier briefing story.

Although the January 10 story from CNN also claimed that Trump was presented with a two-page summary of the dossier, which was not part of the official intelligence community assessment given to Trump, Comey himself later claimed that he did not give the two-page document to Trump, raising questions about whether McCabe himself was a source for CNN’s assertion that Trump had been given the entire two-page document during the briefing.

Shortly after sending his e-mail to Comey and other FBI officials, McCabe e-mailed then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates and her deputy, Matthew Axelrod. McCabe used the subject line “News” in his e-mail to the DOJ officials.

“Just as an FYI, and as expected,” McCabe wrote, “it seems CNN is close to running a story about the sensitive reporting.” It is not clear how McCabe came to be so familiar with CNN’s understanding of the dossier, its briefing, or how close CNN was to reporting on the matter.

In a Monday letter to FBI director Christopher Wray, Sen. Johnson, who chairs the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, asked the director to provide a list of all members of the “sensitive matters team” referenced by Rybicki in his January 6 e-mail. Johnson also requested that Wray provide all details about how FBI officials “first learned that media outlets, including CNN, may have possessed the Steele dossier.”

To date, there is no public evidence that the FBI ever investigated the leaks to media about the briefing between Trump and Comey. When asked in a recent interview by Fox News Channel’s Bret Baier, Comey scoffed at the idea that the FBI would even need to investigate the leak of a secret briefing with the incoming president.

“Did you or your subordinates leak that?” Baier asked.

“No,” Comey responded. “I don’t know who leaked it.”

“Did you ever try to find out?” Baier asked.

“Who leaked an unclassified public document?” Comey said, even though Baier’s question was about leaking details of a briefing of the incoming president, not the dossier. “No,” Comey said.

Johnson requested a response from Wray by 5:00 p.m. on June 4.

Sean Davis is the co-founder of The Federalist.

http://thefederalist.com/2018/05/21/breaking-e-mails-show-fbi-brass-discussed-dossier-briefing-details-cnn/

[Spurminator]

There’s a right and wrong way to do it.

A right way to establish Russian hacking of DNC is to seize the server, for example.

There's no right way to spy on a Presidential campaign to gain a strategic edge. You now seem to have shifted into a procedural argument against the steps the FBI took to investigate Russian interference, which sort of contradicts your earlier statement that this is another Watergate.

Were they investigating Russian interference or were they spying on the campaign to gain a strategic edge?

[monosylab1k]

Going from milquetoast conservative talking points to full-on right wing conspiratard. Republican Walter White becomes Alt-Right Heisenberg before our eyes :lol

[DarrinS]

What's your conspiracy theory about that, Darrin?

IG reports will come out soon for you to read. You can stop asking what my “conspiracy theory” is about. Your schtick is tired.

[DarrinS]

There's no right way to spy on a Presidential campaign

Again, we agree.

[Pavlov]

BREAKING: E-mails Show FBI Brass Discussed Dossier Briefing Details With CNN


New e-mails show former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe was surprisingly knowledgeable about CNN's understanding of and deliberation about a dossier briefing given to Donald Trump days before CNN ever reported on the matter.
Why wouldn't the FBI know about the media at that point?

What's the conspiracy theory now?

[DarrinS]

Just keep asking what the “conspiracy theory” is

[Pavlov]

IG reports will come out soon for you to read. You can stop asking what my “conspiracy theory” is about. Your schtick is tired.
It's your conspiracy theory, Darrin.

[Chris]

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018%2005%2021%20RHJ%20to%20FBI%20Director%20Wray% 20re%20Steele%20Dossier.pdf

[Pavlov]

Just keep asking what the “conspiracy theory” isYou all have them, shitty as they are.

[DarrinS]

Just keep asking what the “conspiracy theory” is


It's your conspiracy theory, Darrin.

Wash, rinse, repeat

[Pavlov]

Wash, rinse, repeat

You can't deny it, Darrin.

[Spurminator]

There’s a right and wrong way to do it.


There's no right way to spy on a Presidential campaign to gain a strategic edge.


Again, we agree.

Huh? What do you mean by "do it" then?

[Chris]

Brennan, Clapper, Comey = fucked

[DarrinS]

Huh? What do you mean by "do it" then?


Not the J. Edgar Hoover way.

[Reck]

From “meh, I don’t care” to caring a whole fucking lot :lol nice change of schtick, this one feels honest tbh

Well, having a thousand + posts on a thread he didn't care about wasn't holding much water so why not just say fuck it lets go full trumpie. :lol

[DarrinS]

Well, having a thousand + posts on a thread he didn't care about wasn't holding much water so why not just say fuck it lets go full trumpie. :lol

(ding) post count

[DarrinS]

Lot of civil libertarians quiet

because Trump

[Chris]

Ohr shit!


https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fpoliticsfocus.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2017%2F12%2Fohr.jpg&f=1


998740366978363392

[Spurminator]

Not the J. Edgar Hoover way.

You're still not making any sense. If there's no right way to spy on a campaign for an advantage, then it doesn't matter whether it was the J. Edgar Hoover way or not.

[DarrinS]

You're still not making any sense. If there's no right way to spy on a campaign for an advantage, then it doesn't matter whether it was the J. Edgar Hoover way or not.

There’s no right way to spy on a campaign. Full stop

[Pavlov]

Lot of civil libertarians quiet

because TrumpWhat?

Explain what civil liberties were violated, Darrin.

[Spurminator]

There’s no right way to spy on a campaign. Full stop

Then I'll re-ask this question: If the FBI suspects a foreign adversary is attempting to influence a Presidential election with the assistance of one of the campaigns, do you want them to ignore it?

[djohn2oo8]

Then I'll re-ask this question: If the FBI suspects a foreign adversary is attempting to influence a Presidential election with the assistance of one of the campaigns, do you want them to ignore it?
Darrin

[DarrinS]

Then I'll re-ask this question: If the FBI suspects a foreign adversary is attempting to influence a Presidential election with the assistance of one of the campaigns, do you want them to ignore it?

with the assistance of one of the campaigns?

You are reaching.

[djohn2oo8]

with the assistance of one of the campaigns?

You are reaching.

Answer the question Darrin.

[DarrinS]

It must be infuriating waiting for Drumpf to get taken down while all this new information keeps coming out.

[Chris]

Why wouldn't the FBI know about the media at that point?

What's the conspiracy theory now?

CNN = deep state confirmed

[DarrinS]

Answer the question Darrin.

They did get assistance from one campaign — Hillary’s (ding)

[Chris]

It must be infuriating waiting for Drumpf to get taken down while all this new information keeps coming out.

No Kyle Griffin tonight.

[DarrinS]

djohn desperately searching for Kyle Griffin tweets
:lol

[Pavlov]

CNN = deep state confirmed
:lol no

[Spurminator]

It must be infuriating waiting for Drumpf to get taken down while all this new information keeps coming out.

It must be blissful to have such a skill at deflecting direct questions with snark and not feeling completely insecure.

We're talking about suspicion. The FBI suspected there might be interference. Manafort, Flynn, Stone, Wikileaks contacts, DTJ's secret meeting... I mean if you honestly don't think there's enough smoke to justify SUSPICION of assistance, then you've clearly picked your side.

I'm in no big rush to see an investigation concluded prematurely. I know history, and I know these things take time.

[Pavlov]

It must be infuriating waiting for Drumpf to get taken down while all this new information keeps coming out.Now we know what conspiracy theory you're waiting for.

[DarrinS]

It must be blissful to have such a skill at deflecting direct questions with snark and not feeling completely insecure.

I answered your question. There is no right way to spy on your opponent’s campaign. Spy on the Russians all you want.

[DarrinS]

Now we know what conspiracy theory you're waiting for.

“conspiracy theory”

Wash, rinse, repeat.

[Spurminator]

I answered your question. There is no right way to spy on your opponent’s campaign. Spy on the Russians all you want.

In doing so you likely gather intel on the campaign as well. That's how these things work. Now you're back to a procedural concern and away from your theory that this was about strategic intel. I can see why you favor snark.

[DarrinS]

In doing so you likely gather intel on the campaign as well. That's how these things work. Now you're back to a procedural concern and away from your theory that this was about strategic intel. I can see why you favor snark.

The queries and the unmasking. Let the IG do his work. :lol

[DarrinS]

“Procedural concern” :lol

[Pavlov]

“conspiracy theory”

Wash, rinse, repeat.You finally admitted your conspiracy theory, Darrin.

Be a proud boy about it.

[DarrinS]

You finally admitted your conspiracy theory, Darrin.

Be a proud boy about it.

“conspiracy theory” (ding)

[Pavlov]

“conspiracy theory” (ding)

What would you rather have people call your conspiracy theory, Darrin?

[djohn2oo8]

Darrin has that "I didn't go to college because I'm too smart" snark about him

[DarrinS]

Darrin has that "I didn't go to college because I'm too smart" snark about him

Fail. I graduated college. But, there are very successful people who drop out. Some of the richest Americans. You should look into that.

[DarrinS]

You guys are having a really good night, but I’m bored.

[djohn2oo8]

I knew if we challenged you, you could say more than *ding*. Good Darrin.

[Pavlov]

You guys are having a really good night, but I’m bored.

You said that hundreds of times ITT.

[TSA]

I knew if we challenged you, you could say more than *ding*. Good Darrin.

:lol “we” “you” challenging anything

are you going to accept my challenge to double our bet yes or no?

[Winehole23]

its a little presumptuous to assume foreign policy functions pre-election, wouldn't you say?

seems like it would be hard for counterintel not to scrutinize foreign agents meeting with candidates beforehand.

[Winehole23]

I mean, it's ridiculous on its face to suggest the FBi can't monitor foreign contacts with a presidential candidate, just because the sitting president belongs to another party.

[djohn2oo8]

I mean, it's ridiculous on its face to suggest the FBi can't monitor foreign contacts with a presidential candidate, just because the sitting president belongs to another party.

They are mad about it because they were caught. When one says, Manafort and Flynn were indicted. They don't respond "well that is the law, they must serve time if convicted". They say "it has nothing to do with Russia", while at the same time seeking to discredit the judge in their cases, Mueller, or anyone who is willing to uphold the law because they cannot answer why Trump would hire people with criminal backgrounds to his team. They will never answer that question. They bash the FBI when it is convenient for them like cowards. They won't say a bad word about Putin though. Fuck em.

[DarrinS]

I mean, it's ridiculous on its face to suggest the FBi can't monitor foreign contacts with a presidential candidate, just because the sitting president belongs to another party.

They should monitor without introducing their own actors, no?

[djohn2oo8]

They should monitor without introducing their own actors, no?
Seems they found illegal activity.

[djohn2oo8]

And give me a fucking break :lol

Since when hasn't the FBI been using informants?

[Pavlov]

They should monitor without introducing their own actors, no?Why not get human intelligence in a counterintelligence operation?

[TSA]

They are mad about it because they were caught. When one says, Manafort and Flynn were indicted. They don't respond "well that is the law, they must serve time if convicted". They say "it has nothing to do with Russia", while at the same time seeking to discredit the judge in their cases, Mueller, or anyone who is willing to uphold the law because they cannot answer why Trump would hire people with criminal backgrounds to his team. They will never answer that question. They bash the FBI when it is convenient for them like cowards. They won't say a bad word about Putin though. Fuck em.

:lmao reduced to a malfunctioning Westworld bot

:cry fuck em :rollin

[TSA]

Seems they found illegal activity.

Illegal activity concerning Trump/Russia election collusion? Do tell.

[djohn2oo8]

Illegal activity concerning Trump/Russia election collusion? Do tell.
Read the indictments.

[Chris]

They are mad about it because they were caught. When one says, Manafort and Flynn were indicted. They don't respond "well that is the law, they must serve time if convicted". They say "it has nothing to do with Russia", while at the same time seeking to discredit the judge in their cases, Mueller, or anyone who is willing to uphold the law because they cannot answer why Trump would hire people with criminal backgrounds to his team. They will never answer that question. They bash the FBI when it is convenient for them like cowards. They won't say a bad word about Putin though. Fuck em.

Manafort's charges have nothing to do with the election. Flynn was pressured into pleading guilty. You don't really have anything to stand on tbh. :lol

[Chris]

998807156051755008

Pavlov's favorite news outlet :tu

[djohn2oo8]

Manafort's charges have nothing to do with the election. Flynn was pressured into pleading guilty. You don't really have anything to stand on tbh. :lol

So Flynn was pressured to commit perjury? :lmao

[Pavlov]

998807156051755008

Pavlov's favorite news outlet :tu:lmao gentry Breitbart

[boutons_deux]

Trump Fundraiser Reportedly Secured $1 Billion in Contracts From Saudi Arabia and UAE to Push Anti-Qatar Policies With Trump

The Associated Press published (https://apnews.com/a3521859cf8d4c199cb9a8567abd2b71) a damning account Monday of the former top Trump fundraiser and RNC fundraising chair Elliott Broidy and his Lebanese-American business partner George Nader, who

offered up access to the White House and Trump himself to the crown princes of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates

in return for a billion dollars in consulting contracts.

Both men have criminal record;

Broidy, in 2009, pleaded guilty (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4471474-Broidy-Nader-Correspondence-Redacted2.html) to a felony charge of rewarding official misconduct, a.k.a. bribing officials to win a New York state pension fund investment deal, and

Nader was convicted of 10 counts of sexually abusing minors in 2003 and spent one year in jail in the Czech Republic for it.

“A new cache of emails obtained by the AP reveals an ambitious, secretive lobbying effort

to isolate Qatar and undermine the Pentagon’s longstanding relationship with the Gulf country.”

Neither Broidy nor Nader registered as a lobbyist working for a foreign government as required by the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA).

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/05/top-trump-fundraiser-broidy-reportedly-secured-usd1-billion-in-contracts-from-saudi-arabia-and-uae-in-return-for-pushing-anti-qatar-policies-to-administration.html

Remember, it's Qatar that is bailing out the "failing" Kushner family's 666 5th fiasco.

[Spurminator]

“Procedural concern” :lol

Well yeah, that seems to be it. You're more upset by their methods than what they may uncover. (Not to mention you keep going back and forth on what you think their motivation is.)

[RandomGuy]

Which campaign officials had contacts with Russians or people linked to Russia after the August 17th counterintelligence briefing?

We'll get to find out at Mueller time.

[RandomGuy]

“President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities ‘by the book’. The President stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.”


Smh

DarrinS is shocked that Obama did his job appropriately after having believed all the lies about him during years of brainwashing.

smh

[RandomGuy]

Was the adoptions meeting before or after the counterintelligence briefing?

Before.

Did Don Jr. inform the FBI after getting the briefing?

[djohn2oo8]

Still waiting on Chris and crew to tell me what Democrats are in charge of these investigations

[boutons_deux]

Trump Says He Has No Idea Who F.B.I. Informant Might Be

https://media.newyorker.com/photos/5b0338e1ea55d1047a3d10c8/master/w_1298,c_limit/Borowitz-TrumpFBIInformant.jpg


WASHINGTON —Donald J. Trump said on Monday that he is “a-hundred-per-cent positive” that an F.B.I. informant infiltrated his 2016 campaign but that he has “absolutely no idea” who that mole might be.

“I’ve been trying to figure out who would have the opportunity and the motive to do something like this,” he said.

“But I keep coming up empty.”

“Opportunity-wise, you’d need to be someone who’s in my inner circle and who could get close to me without raising suspicions,”

he said.

“But, then again, the person would have to be able to suddenly disappear for periods of time and report back to the F.B.I. I can’t think of anyone in a position to do that.”

“As for motive, you’d really have to be out to get me,” Trump added.

“Now, I have enemies like anyone else.

But I can’t think of anyone I’ve given a reason to really, really hate me.”

Trump said that he would “keep trying to figure out who it is,” but he admitted that, at this point, the informant’s identity was “a total mystery.”

“I’m kind of an amateur detective,” Trump said.

“I watch ‘Law & Order,’ I watch all the ‘Law & Order’s. I watch all the shows.

But, I’ve got to say, this one has me stumped.”

https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/trump-says-he-has-no-idea-who-fbi-informant-might-be

[clambake]

Trump Says He Has No Idea Who F.B.I. Informant Might Be

https://media.newyorker.com/photos/5b0338e1ea55d1047a3d10c8/master/w_1298,c_limit/Borowitz-TrumpFBIInformant.jpg


WASHINGTON —Donald J. Trump said on Monday that he is “a-hundred-per-cent positive” that an F.B.I. informant infiltrated his 2016 campaign but that he has “absolutely no idea” who that mole might be.

“I’ve been trying to figure out who would have the opportunity and the motive to do something like this,” he said.

“But I keep coming up empty.”

“Opportunity-wise, you’d need to be someone who’s in my inner circle and who could get close to me without raising suspicions,”

he said.

“But, then again, the person would have to be able to suddenly disappear for periods of time and report back to the F.B.I. I can’t think of anyone in a position to do that.”

“As for motive, you’d really have to be out to get me,” Trump added.

“Now, I have enemies like anyone else.

But I can’t think of anyone I’ve given a reason to really, really hate me.”

Trump said that he would “keep trying to figure out who it is,” but he admitted that, at this point, the informant’s identity was “a total mystery.”

“I’m kind of an amateur detective,” Trump said.

“I watch ‘Law & Order,’ I watch all the ‘Law & Order’s. I watch all the shows.

But, I’ve got to say, this one has me stumped.”

https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/trump-says-he-has-no-idea-who-fbi-informant-might-be

ok thats funny

[boutons_deux]

Michael Flynn Jr. Issues a Cryptic — and Disturbing — Warning: 'You’re All Going Down’

It's not clear whose downfall Flynn Jr. was cryptically prophesying.

https://www.alternet.org/michael-flynn-jr-issues-cryptic-and-disturbing-warning-youre-all-going-down

Does F Junior know how badly F Senior has implicated Trash and his mafiya?

And is F Junior include himself in "you're all"?

[TSA]

998770216321433600

ruh roh

[boutons_deux]

Trash, his mafiya, Repugs to come up with a strategy, talking points to LIE, actually slander, that the FBI counter-intelligence operation on Trash and his mafiya having 100s of contacts with Russians was actually Obama/Hillary/Dems political spying, not counter-intelligence.

White House to convene GOP lawmakers to review classified information on FBI source

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/rosenstein-wray-to-meet-with-trump-amid-brewing-controversy-over-fbis-use-of-confidential-informant-in-russia-probe/2018/05/21/b3da543e-5d06-11e8-a4a4-c070ef53f315_story.html?utm_term=.15a3e1ea19f0&wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1

[TSA]

998770216321433600

ruh roh

Very interesting that the emails Ron Johnson is referring to came from OIG Horowitz and are post-election.

[Pavlov]

998770216321433600

ruh roh


Very interesting that the emails Ron Johnson is referring to came from OIG Horowitz and are post-election.Of course the FBI knew the media knew about the dossier. It was an open secret by that time.

[djohn2oo8]

999030245176102912
For the people in the back

[boutons_deux]

Trash, his mafiya, Repugs to come up with a strategy, talking points to LIE, actually slander, that the FBI counter-intelligence operation on Trash and his mafiya having 100s of contacts with Russians was actually Obama/Hillary/Dems political spying, not counter-intelligence.

White House to convene GOP lawmakers to review classified information on FBI source


https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/rosenstein-wray-to-meet-with-trump-amid-brewing-controversy-over-fbis-use-of-confidential-informant-in-russia-probe/2018/05/21/b3da543e-5d06-11e8-a4a4-c070ef53f315_story.html?utm_term=.15a3e1ea19f0&wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1 (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/rosenstein-wray-to-meet-with-trump-amid-brewing-controversy-over-fbis-use-of-confidential-informant-in-russia-probe/2018/05/21/b3da543e-5d06-11e8-a4a4-c070ef53f315_story.html?utm_term=.15a3e1ea19f0&wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1)



White House Bars Democrats From Meeting on Russia Investigation Records



Meeting with Justice Department officials set for Thursday
Chief of staff Kelly organized meeting but won’t participate



Two House Republican leaders -- and no Democrats -- will

meet with FBI Director Christopher Wray and Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats

on Thursday to

discuss records the lawmakers have demanded related to the Russia investigation.

White House officials also won’t participate. :lol yep, will be totally uninformed! :lol

Trump demanded in a tweet on Sunday that the Justice Department investigate whether the department or the FBI “infiltrated or surveilled” his campaign “for political purposes” and whether Obama administration officials were involved.

There is no evidence the FBI planted an informant in his campaign.

“It would be inappropriate for the White House to inquire about any ongoing investigation and put pressure to direct it’s outcome,” Schumer said on Tuesday.

“It’s even worse when the president and his campaign are subject to that investigation.

So I think it’s very wrong and I think it shouldn’t be done.

It’s unprecedented, it’s outrageous.

And it has overtones of things that would be done in a banana republic.”

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-22/white-house-bars-democrats-from-nunes-meeting-on-probe-records

you tell 'em, Chucky

Clearly, Trash has crossed yet another line, unPresidented and unConstitutional, in demanding an investigation of the investigation into his sicko self and his mafiya.

[Chris]

999008471323377664

[Pavlov]

999008471323377664:lol Stone stealing the "die in prison" shtick

[Reck]

The right looneys here and on twitter seem to bounce from person to person and when said person doesn't go to jail they simply move the goalpost to a random Obama admin person.

:lol Hillary Clinton will go to jail
:lol Susan Rice will go to jail
:lol James Clapper is fucked
:lol Farkas woman done--GET READY FOR PRISON
:lol John Brennan will die in prison

And a Chris special:

Obama WILL BE IMPEACHED!

:lmao

[Chris]

The right looneys here and on twitter seem to bounce from person to person and when said person doesn't go to jail they simply move the goalpost to a random Obama admin person.

:lol Hillary Clinton will go to jail
:lol Susan Rice will go to jail
:lol James Clapper is fucked
:lol Farkas woman done--GET READY FOR PRISON
:lol John Brennan will die in prison

And a Chris special:

Obama WILL BE IMPEACHED!

:lmao

xJXOIg2o6PA

[Chris]

998954594129666048

[Pavlov]

xJXOIg2o6PANone of these people are even being investigated.

:lol

[djohn2oo8]

xJXOIg2o6PA

https://media1.tenor.com/images/9a4580b60657046d777c1c26a45526e6/tenor.gif?itemid=10362347

[Pavlov]

998954594129666048:lmao spying operation

[Chris]

:lmao spying operation

:lmao full denial

*nervous laughter

[djohn2oo8]

:lmao full denial

*nervous laughter


https://media1.tenor.com/images/9a4580b60657046d777c1c26a45526e6/tenor.gif?itemid=10362347

[Chris]

Where is Halper?


998962715296239617

[Pavlov]

:lmao full denial

*nervous laughterFull denial of what, Chris?

State your conspiracy theory in your own words.

[Chris]

998931474312122369

[djohn2oo8]

Chris desperately hunting on twitter for anything

[Pavlov]

Where is Halper?


998962715296239617To be officially missing, there has to be an official missing person report.

Is there one, Chris?

[Chris]

Full denial of what, Chris?

That's rather obvious.


State your conspiracy theory in your own words.

I'm an open book unlike you snowflake.

[Pavlov]

998931474312122369The setup operation that was never used.

lol

[Pavlov]

That's rather obvious.Nope. Explain.


I'm an open book unlike you snowflake.Great, then state your conspiracy theory in your own words.

Let's read your open book.

[Chris]

Nope. Explain.

you don't think it was a spying operation. You choose to live in the dark.


Great, then state your conspiracy theory in your own words.

Let's read your open book.

Not my fault if you haven't been paying attention. Go back to page 1 and try again.

[Pavlov]

you don't think it was a spying operation. You choose to live in the dark.It was a counterintelligence operation.


Not my fault if you haven't been paying attention. Go back to page 1 and try again.:lmao So you aren't an open book at all. Your book is completely closed to any inquiry.

[TSA]

999044618980413440

[djohn2oo8]

:lmao undercover Huber

[TSA]

999044618980413440

999044622545555456

[Chris]

998983947664031744

She's back.

[djohn2oo8]

TSA deflecting from the Cohen news :lol

[DarrinS]

To be officially missing, there has to be an official missing person report.

Is there one, Chris?

Halper isn’t missing. Mifsud is missing.

[Chris]

Guessing Halper wanted full protection and is singing like a bird.

[Pavlov]

999044618980413440I didn't see "US government official" in the clip.

Is there another one somewhere?

[Pavlov]

Halper isn’t missing. Mifsud is missing.I didn't make the claim about Halper. Chris did. Take it up with him.

[Chris]

We know this guy is talking :lol


https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fpoliticsfocus.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2017%2F12%2Fohr.jpg&f=1


998740366978363392

[Pavlov]

We know this guy is talking :lol


https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fpoliticsfocus.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2017%2F12%2Fohr.jpg&f=1


998740366978363392Why wouldn't Ohr talk to investigators?

[DarrinS]

I didn't make the claim about Halper. Chris did. Take it up with him.

Just clarifying

[Pavlov]

Just clarifyingOK, clarify your conspiracy theory with Misfud, Darrin.

[DarrinS]

998983947664031744

She's back.

The hag. :lmao

[Pavlov]

998983947664031744

She's back.:lol James Woods doesn't know what the IG report is saying either.

[boutons_deux]

https://www.newsbusters.org/s3/files/styles/blog_body-50/s3/images/jim_carrey_tweet_trump_kissing_ass.png?itok=TdwyUS zU