PDA

View Full Version : Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions



Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 [61] 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210

DisAsTerBot
12-04-2017, 09:15 PM
Who are you addressing?

:rollin

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 09:15 PM
The only person who has seemed to imply both of those things within the last dozen posts or so.

I don’t think I’ve brought up Hillary’s emails in a long time.

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 09:17 PM
No one fails harder than the Pizzagate crew.

This is the second time you’ve said this about me. I have made ZERO posts about that.

You fail.

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 09:18 PM
You guys should learn to use the search feature.

djohn2oo8
12-04-2017, 09:18 PM
This is the second time you’ve said this about me. I have made ZERO posts about that.

You fail.

You have made zero posts condemning it. Little Darrin.

Chris
12-04-2017, 09:19 PM
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton appeared on Fox & Friends to discuss the politicization of the FBI, discussing how Judicial Watch has uncovered piles of evidence that the Clinton investigation was flawed, including discussing the Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting, the FBI leadership's conflicts of interest, and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe's wife taking hundreds of thousands of dollars from Clinton allies during the investigation. Mr. Fitton also discussed how Robert Mueller's out-of-control special counsel investigation has become intensely politicized as well.

VIDEO: www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/in-the-news/video-tom-fitton-politicization-mueller-investigation/

djohn2oo8
12-04-2017, 09:20 PM
Poor Chris. The investigation is driving him mad. Living in this thread 24/7 these days. I love it!

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 09:21 PM
You have made zero posts condemning it. Little Darrin.

By your logic, I’m a pizzagate conspiracist since I had zero activity in that thread?

Chris
12-04-2017, 09:22 PM
Poor Chris. The investigation is driving him mad. Living in this thread 24/7 these days. I love it!

You like the attention here because you got the wrong kind in the NBA forum. :lol

djohn2oo8
12-04-2017, 09:22 PM
By your logic, I’m a pizzagate conspiracist since I had zero activity in that thread?

Proving my point. You claim everything to be a nothingburger but pizzagate. Which you still haven't stated your opinion on.

Spurminator
12-04-2017, 09:23 PM
I don’t think I’ve brought up Hillary’s emails in a long time.

The Ben Shapiro tweet that you referenced when you said this:


Shapiro’s tweet suggests that the FBI is highly politicized. Something the Dems strongly believed a year ago.

was referencing the Hillary email investigation. Perhaps you misunderstood his tweet.

djohn2oo8
12-04-2017, 09:23 PM
You like the attention here because you got the wrong kind in the NBA forum. :lol

No i love it because you post parody accounts thinking they are real.

DisAsTerBot
12-04-2017, 09:23 PM
You like the attention here because you got the wrong kind in the NBA forum. :lol

Lol Chris. You’re so stupid it’s fantastic

dabom
12-04-2017, 09:24 PM
Darrin still hasn't proven how the FBI is politicized.

Spurminator
12-04-2017, 09:24 PM
By your logic, I’m a pizzagate conspiracist since I had zero activity in that thread?

It is telling which specific topics set off your skeptic radar.

Meanwhile plenty of liberals have called djohn out for sketchy claims ITT.

Just saying.

djohn2oo8
12-04-2017, 09:24 PM
Darrin still hasn't proven how the FBI is politicized.

He just learned the word give him a few minutes.

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 09:25 PM
Proving my point. You claim everything to be a nothingburger but pizzagate. Which you still haven't stated your opinion on.

I always thought the pizzagate thing was a hoax. Happy now?

dabom
12-04-2017, 09:26 PM
I always thought the pizzagate thing was a hoax. Happy now?

Faggotular and chrissy gonna be mad.

djohn2oo8
12-04-2017, 09:26 PM
I always thought the pizzagate thing was a hoax. Happy now?

Now was that so hard?

djohn2oo8
12-04-2017, 09:26 PM
See TSA and Chris, Darrin thinks yall are retards.

Chris
12-04-2017, 09:27 PM
thinking they are real.

Never said such. You fellows are easily triggered though by memes and tweets. I'm sure Kyle Griffin is digging deep for excuses tonight.

dabom
12-04-2017, 09:27 PM
Faggotular and chrissy gonna be mad.

dabom
12-04-2017, 09:28 PM
Still like the honesty, Darrin.

djohn2oo8
12-04-2017, 09:29 PM
Never said such. You fellows are easily triggered though by memes and tweets. I'm sure Kyle Griffin is digging deep for excuses tonight.

You bring up triggered by tweets and proceed to bring up Kyle Griffin. Kyle got ya upset and restless.

Chris
12-04-2017, 09:32 PM
You bring up triggered by tweets and proceed to bring up Kyle Griffin. Kyle got ya upset and restless.

Kyle was relevant since he's a harcore tweeter. It's called conversation flow and chain of thought :tu

djohn2oo8
12-04-2017, 09:34 PM
Kyle was relevant since he's a harcore tweeter. It's called conversation flow and chain of thought :tu

Again you don't know what you are talking about. But I do see the Flynn indictment has brought you here more than usual.

Chris
12-04-2017, 09:35 PM
Mark Levin: 'There Is No Collusion With The Russians'
"No collusion today, no collusion yesterday ..."


On his nationally syndicated radio show Friday, Mark Levin challenged the notion of President Donald Trump colluding with the Russians to win the 2016 election. His theory rests on the guilty plea that former National Security Advisor Mike Flynn made with FBI special counsel Robert Mueller.

"There is no collusion with the Russians. No collusion today, no collusion yesterday, no collusion the day before yesterday," Levin said. "Mr. Mueller hasn't brought a single charge related to collusion with the Russians ... before the election, he hasn't brought a single charge related to collusion with the Russians to influence the election."

He pointed to the fact that former FBI Director James Comey doubted Flynn was intentionally lying and declined to press charges against him.

Levin continued, "We have charges in this investigation with Mr. Manafort and Gates related to failure to file as federal agents, charges that are almost never brought. We have charges on tax violations without bringing any tax evasion charges."

He pointed out that so far the FBI special counsel investigation has resulted in false statement pleas with Trump campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopolous and now with Mike Flynn.

Levin pointed out, "Contact with foreign governments by an incoming administration. It is not illegal, it is not criminal, in any sense. Those conversations, to the extent that they took place, Mr. Mueller has access to, as a result of the constant, as we've learned over the past many months due to leaks, the constant espionage that goes on in terms of the ambassador to Russia and others."

He added, "So they know what was discussed. And yet there is no charge of collusion, they know it was discussed, but there is no collusion charge, no substantive, underlying criminal charge."

Levin emphasized, "Despite all the static, all the jumping up and down ... what Mr. Mueller has demonstrated today, with the information that he has put out in open court, and leaked out through his surrogates, what Mr. Mueller has demonstrated today is he has no collusion case against anyone."

www.dailywire.com/news/24250/mark-levin-there-no-collusion-russians-jacob-airey

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 09:35 PM
You bring up triggered by tweets and proceed to bring up Kyle Griffin. Kyle got ya upset and restless.

Kyle mostly just retweets WAPO. And then you copypasta them here. :lol

Better than Mensch, Claude Taylor, etc. I’ll give you that much.

djohn2oo8
12-04-2017, 09:38 PM
Kyle mostly just retweets WAPO. And then you copypasta them here. :lol

Better than Mensch, Claude Taylor, etc. I’ll give you that much.

And they have also been right.

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 09:38 PM
Yeah, collusion is dead. Dems knew this early on, which is why they were trying to intimidate with the archaic Logan Act. No one has ever been prosecuted for that, so they are trying to build an obstruction case.

Chris
12-04-2017, 09:38 PM
Again you don't know what you are talking about.

aka "I give up" ^


But I do see the Flynn indictment has brought you here more than usual.

Nothing gets past you.

djohn2oo8
12-04-2017, 09:38 PM
Yeah Chris is melting down.

Chris
12-04-2017, 09:38 PM
Yeah, collusion is dead. Dems knew this early on, which is why they were trying to intimidate with the archaic Logan Act. No one has ever been prosecuted for that, so they are trying to build an obstruction case.

Witch hunt.

djohn2oo8
12-04-2017, 09:39 PM
Yeah, collusion is dead. Dems knew this early on, which is why they were trying to intimidate with the archaic Logan Act. No one has ever been prosecuted for that, so they are trying to build an obstruction case.
Where does it say Mueller isn't investigating Trump's contacts to Russia and their role in the election?

djohn2oo8
12-04-2017, 09:40 PM
Witch hunt.

With 4 indictments :lol

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 09:40 PM
Witch hunt.

Would probably be over by now, if he hadn’t fired Comey tho. That was a major fuckup.

djohn2oo8
12-04-2017, 09:41 PM
Would probably be over by now, if he hadn’t fired Comey tho. That was a major fuckup.

If it was a witch hunt, why do you continue to post here? A witch hunt shouldn't bother you Darrin.

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 09:42 PM
Where does it say Mueller isn't investigating Trump's contacts to Russia and their role in the election?

Under the guise of Russian interference, he’s free to look for any crimes. So far — false statements.

djohn2oo8
12-04-2017, 09:42 PM
Benghazi and Pizzagate were real witch hunts. Trump's investigation has more indictments than those combined :lol

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 09:46 PM
Benghazi and Pizzagate were real witch hunts. Trump's investigation has more indictments than those combined :lol


You really going to compare Benghazi to Pizzagate?

You should be ashamed, tbh.

djohn2oo8
12-04-2017, 09:47 PM
You really going to compare Benghazi to Pizzagate?

You should be ashamed, tbh.

They both resulted in criminal prosecution of who? Okay then. Mueller is bullying niggas spending less money than the Benghazi shit.

Spurminator
12-04-2017, 09:48 PM
To be fair, Pizzagate was never the subject of a Congressional inquiry. It was just a fringe conspiracy theory clung to by some of the worst people and biggest idiots in existence.

djohn2oo8
12-04-2017, 09:49 PM
To be fair, Pizzagate was never the subject of a Congressional inquiry. It was just a fringe conspiracy theory clung to by some of the worst people and biggest idiots in existence.

They both resulted in nothing. Hillary not indicted.

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 09:54 PM
They both resulted in criminal prosecution of who? Okay then. Mueller is bullying niggas spending less money than the Benghazi shit.


To be fair, Pizzagate was never the subject of a Congressional inquiry. It was just a fringe conspiracy theory clung to by some of the worst people and biggest idiots in existence.


Yeah, one was a 4chan hoax, the other was a real event where real people died.

But neither resulted in a Hillary conviction, so there’s that.

djohn2oo8
12-04-2017, 09:56 PM
Yeah, one was a 4chan hoax, the other was a real event where real people died.

But neither resulted in a Hillary conviction, so there’s that.

Don't remember seeing you have that much outrage over Niger.

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 10:00 PM
Don't remember seeing you have that much outrage over Niger.

Did the Trump admin claim the attack was inspired by a YouTube video?

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 10:02 PM
I’m sure there will be a movie about Pizzagate soon.

djohn2oo8
12-04-2017, 10:04 PM
Did the Trump admin claim the attack was inspired by a YouTube video?

No they just contracted out the air support, lied about the mission while a soldier was sent home in pieces. But I see you didn't care about the people who died in Benghazi either.

TSA
12-04-2017, 10:09 PM
937815629964263424

937872957711495169

djohn2oo8
12-04-2017, 10:09 PM
TSA cat got your tongue? Scared to be wrong again or what.

Pavlov
12-04-2017, 10:14 PM
937872957711495169:lol embattled


Who is battling him, TSA?

TSA
12-04-2017, 10:34 PM
TSA cat got your tongue? Scared to be wrong again or what.

937757797847932928

Pavlov
12-04-2017, 10:36 PM
937757797847932928TSAbot returns to repeat the same innuendo!

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 10:57 PM
TSAbot returns to repeat the same innuendo!

That “innuendo” is much more plausible than muh Russia collusion, tbh.

TSA
12-04-2017, 10:58 PM
Man, TSA is trying really hard these days.

Good news.

Got your "Flynn's intentional commission of a felony to expose the baby eaters" theory ready yet?

Would Flynn pleading guilty to a charge wipe out an NDA associated with his prior clearance and allow him to testify in court on any and all known crimes?

Pavlov
12-04-2017, 10:59 PM
Would Flynn pleading guilty to a charge wipe out an NDA associated with his prior clearance and allow him to testify in court on any and all known crimes?Just tell us what your intentional felony theory is, TSA. No games. No questions three.

Pavlov
12-04-2017, 11:00 PM
That “innuendo” is much more plausible than muh Russia collusion, tbh.It's not muh collusion, Darrin. You never said how you think the FBI is highly politicized.

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 11:03 PM
It's not muh collusion, Darrin. You never said how you think the FBI is highly politicized.

I sure did. There are high-ranking figures in the FBI with their own political agendas. Clear enough?

Pavlov
12-04-2017, 11:03 PM
I sure did. There are high-ranking figures in the FBI with their own political agendas. Clear enough?That's it?

Which ones other than the ones Ben Shapiro told you about?

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 11:05 PM
That's it?

Which ones other than the ones Ben Shapiro told you about?

Wow, I have to name them all?

Pavlov
12-04-2017, 11:07 PM
Wow, I have to name them all?How many do you know who who are high ranking and follow their own political agendas, Darrin?

50?

1000?

1 you read in a tweet?

Chris
12-04-2017, 11:07 PM
Wow, I have to name them all?

He can never do his own homework. I try to give him cliff notes, but he may need a private tutor or possibly shock therapy :lol

TSA
12-04-2017, 11:08 PM
That's it?

Which ones other than the ones Ben Shapiro told you about?

Which one other than the one who interviewed Clinton, Mills, Abedin, lead the Clinton investigation, changed Comey’s language to careless, lead the Trump investigation, and was a handler of Christopher Steele? :rollin

Pavlov
12-04-2017, 11:09 PM
He can never do his own homework. I try to give him cliff notes, but he may need a private tutor or possibly shock therapy :lolFeel free to name FBI agents other than the ones you've been told to say, Chris.

I'm waiting.

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 11:09 PM
How many do you know who who are high ranking and follow their own political agendas, Darrin?

50?

1000?


I have no clue.

TSA
12-04-2017, 11:09 PM
Just tell us what your intentional felony theory is, TSA. No games. No questions three.

The question you dodged makes pretty clear what my theory is.

Pavlov
12-04-2017, 11:10 PM
Which one other than the one who interviewed Clinton, Mills, Abedin, lead the Clinton investigation, changed Comey’s language to careless, lead the Trump investigation, and was a handler of Christopher Steele? :rollinDarrin said there was more than one.

Post your Flynn theory, TSA.

Quit stalling.

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 11:10 PM
Which one other than the one who interviewed Clinton, Mills, Abedin, lead the Clinton investigation, changed Comey’s language to careless, lead the Trump investigation, and was a handler of Christopher Steele? :rollin

Good point. Doesn’t take many.

Pavlov
12-04-2017, 11:11 PM
The question you dodged makes pretty clear what my theory is.No, it doesn't. I have no interest in your games. If you have a matter of fact, don't ask a stupid question about it.

Post your Flynn theory.

Quit stalling.

Pavlov
12-04-2017, 11:11 PM
Good point. Doesn’t take many.Who are the other ones, Darrin?

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 11:13 PM
Who are the other ones, Darrin?

I’m not interested, but thanks.

Pavlov
12-04-2017, 11:14 PM
I’m not interested, but thanks.:lmao So just the one Shapiro told you to think about.

Nice.

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 11:15 PM
:lmao So just the one Shapiro told you to think about.

Nice.


Yep. No one had ever heard of that person before Shapiro’s tweet.

Pavlov
12-04-2017, 11:16 PM
Yep. No one had ever heard of that person before Shapiro’s tweet.Or any right wing source.

You never heard of him before they told you -- and now you declare many more high ranking officials there are following their own political agendas -- but you won't name them because :cry.

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 11:20 PM
It’s funny when libs think you only have an opinion because you saw a tweet.

I’m glad no #TrumpRussiaTards have posted any tweets in this thread that might inform their opinions. :lmao

Pavlov
12-04-2017, 11:22 PM
It’s funny when libs think you only have an opinion because you saw a tweet.

I’m glad no #TrumpRussiaTards have posted any tweets in this thread that might inform their opinions. :lmaoOh, when did you form this opinion that multiple current high level FBI officials follow their own political agendas, Darrin?

Let's discuss this.

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 11:22 PM
Or any right wing source.

You never heard of him before they told you -- and now you declare many more high ranking officials there are following their own political agendas -- but you won't name them because :cry.


Muh right wing conspiracy

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/02/us/politics/mueller-removed-top-fbi-agent-over-possible-anti-trump-texts.html

dabom
12-04-2017, 11:23 PM
Muh right wing conspiracy

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/02/us/politics/mueller-removed-top-fbi-agent-over-possible-anti-trump-texts.html

And he was removed. That proves what?

Pavlov
12-04-2017, 11:24 PM
Muh right wing conspiracy

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/02/us/politics/mueller-removed-top-fbi-agent-over-possible-anti-trump-texts.html


Oh, when did you form this opinion that multiple current high level FBI officials follow their own political agendas, Darrin?

Let's discuss this.

dabom
12-04-2017, 11:26 PM
Also a couple instances doesn't make all the Defense departments politicized. Unless their is actual evidence of systematic corruption, I'm gonna say that was a lie.

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 11:27 PM
And he was removed. That proves what?

That he was politicized and could hurt the credibility of the investigation.

dabom
12-04-2017, 11:28 PM
That he was politicized and could hurt the credibility of the investigation.

He probably maybe. That's not any departments though. Which you were talking about.

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 11:32 PM
He probably maybe. That's not any departments though. Which you were talking about.

I may have over generalized. There are individual(s) within bureaucracies that have political agendas. The more high-ranking and influential, the more (cringe using this word) problematic.

Pavlov
12-04-2017, 11:33 PM
I may have over generalized. There are individual(s) within bureaucracies that have political agendas. The more high-ranking and influential, the more (cringe using this word) problematic.So you only really know just the one, Darrin?

dabom
12-04-2017, 11:35 PM
I may have over generalized. There are individual(s) within bureaucracies that have political agendas. The more high-ranking and influential, the more (cringe using this word) problematic.

Every organization in the world has bad apples. Good thing departments run on facts.

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 11:35 PM
So you only really know just the one, Darrin?

McCabe

Pavlov
12-04-2017, 11:36 PM
McCabeWhat is the evidence he acted in a highly politicized fashion?

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 11:36 PM
Every organization in the world has bad apples. Good thing departments run on facts.

Great point. This should be applied to all law enforcement.

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 11:38 PM
Gotta remove those bad apples tho.

dabom
12-04-2017, 11:39 PM
Great point. This should be applied to all law enforcement.

I agree. I also think Law Enforcement is too close to the Judges and usually always has more resources than the regular people that they kill sometimes.

dabom
12-04-2017, 11:39 PM
Gotta remove those bad apples tho.

I think Law Enforcement is good though.

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 11:43 PM
I agree. I also think Law Enforcement is too close to the Judges and usually always has more resources than the regular people that they kill sometimes.


It’s getting harder for them to get away with shit nowadays with so many people with cameras and social media.

dabom
12-04-2017, 11:46 PM
It’s getting harder for them to get away with shit nowadays with so many people with cameras and social media.
Cops should wear camera vests at all times. And should be on as soon as they start working. They save tons of money from lawsuits and the complaints against cops actually diminishes a ton, whether its cause the person is nicer now, or the cops can't do any dirty shit anymore. It's a win/win.

DarrinS
12-04-2017, 11:47 PM
Cops should wear camera vests at all times. And should be on as soon as they start working. They save tons of money from lawsuits and the complaints against cops actually diminishes a ton, whether its cause the person is nicer now, or the cops can't do any dirty shit anymore. It's a win/win.


I agree, but only works if they turn them on

dabom
12-04-2017, 11:50 PM
I agree, but only works if they turn them on

And that can show you a pattern of a dirty cop if it happens often. Proof we wouldn't have before. Get those guys out.

boutons_deux
12-04-2017, 11:50 PM
Cops should wear camera vests at all times. And should be on as soon as they start working. They save tons of money from lawsuits and the complaints against cops actually diminishes a ton, whether its cause the person is nicer now, or the cops can't do any dirty shit anymore. It's a win/win.

The Vids are often not public esp not the cop-incriminating ones

dabom
12-04-2017, 11:51 PM
The Vids are often not public esp not the cop-incriminating ones

We should have reform on this. Good thing SA is doing this now, I believe. At least wearing camera vests.

DarrinS
12-05-2017, 12:02 AM
And that can show you a pattern of a dirty cop if it happens often. Proof we wouldn't have before. Get those guys out.

And it can also exonerate good cops.

dabom
12-05-2017, 12:12 AM
And it can also exonerate good cops.

:tu

spurraider21
12-05-2017, 02:06 AM
I’m sure there will be a movie about Pizzagate soon.
dinesh d'souza tbh

boutons_deux
12-05-2017, 06:18 AM
Deutsche Bank receives subpoena from Mueller on Trump accounts

Special Counsel Robert Mueller has asked Deutsche Bank (DBKGn.DE (https://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/overview/DBKGn.DE)) to share data on accounts held by U.S. President Donald Trump and his family, a person close to the matter said on Tuesday.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-deutsche-bank/deutsche-bank-receives-subpoena-from-mueller-on-trump-accounts-source-idUSKBN1DZ0XN?il=0&mc_cid=2b276d770e&mc_eid=47e367557b

IIRC, DB lent Trash $400M when US banks blackballed Trash after his repeated bankruptcies (defaulted on bank loans)

If Pootin lent the money to DB, then DB lent the "laundered" money to Trash, of course telling Trash that Pootin was the source was so Trash knew who had him by the balls.

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 07:30 AM
I would like to hear Darrins thoughts, since he thinks the FBI is politicized because one agent had an opinion, what does Darrin think about Trump's own CIA director stating that he loved Wikileaks?

pgardn
12-05-2017, 08:08 AM
Yes.




And Yes.


I will get back.
Good exercise.
Gotta shower
Gotta eat
Gotta watch my Spurs.

Brevity, and concise properly ordered arguments, are not my forte on an iPad and sports forum.

I will address all in a more complete fashion later today as work calls.

1st yes: Not even consulting the other party and using a procedure that assures a 50/50 split vote was extraordinary. But not now, as in under the Trump admin. There was a clear reason for 60 votes. It was good reasoning IMO. It allowed for legislation to take a while (not good) and be thoroughly debated for possible unintended outcomes. The later has been circumvented by writing in the margins. Now the Republicans totally own mistakes. Bad mistakes made in a margin writing rush to just pass anything. The same could not be said for Obamacare as it was very contentiously put out for the public and passed with known errors. Later on this with the taxes and affect on O care.

2nd yes: Will center around this theme.

This is scattershot in who benefits and loses. You can talk averages if you want, but this really depends on specific situations. Not in question, Huge deficits. Republicans now own this. More later.

Next: what Obamacre has done so far in the health of our country and how this bill will change how "we" are taken care of.

I will return. F'N spell check has gone nuts...

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 08:15 AM
938029348275326976
Lordy!

diego
12-05-2017, 09:10 AM
I agree, but only works if they turn them on

And if convictions come when abuses are registered.

DarrinS
12-05-2017, 10:01 AM
I would like to hear Darrins thoughts, since he thinks the FBI is politicized because one agent had an opinion, what does Darrin think about Trump's own CIA director stating that he loved Wikileaks?

I think he’s changed his tune on Wikileaks.

boutons_deux
12-05-2017, 10:28 AM
938029348275326976
Lordy!

I'm surprised this took so long

LaMarcus Bryant
12-05-2017, 11:11 AM
The Deutsche Bank stuff is gonna be YYYYUUUUUUGE

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 11:37 AM
I think he’s changed his tune on Wikileaks.

You didn't answer the question. Why would the CIA Director ever embrace a foreign agent of an adversary?

TSA
12-05-2017, 11:48 AM
938029348275326976
Lordy!

An internal investigation carried out by Deutsche Bank didn’t yield any evidence of connections between the client relationship with Trump and the bank’s so-called Russian mirror trades affair, a person briefed on the matter said.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-05/deutsche-bank-is-said-to-have-received-subpoena-on-client-trump

:lol

DarrinS
12-05-2017, 12:44 PM
An internal investigation carried out by Deutsche Bank didn’t yield any evidence of connections between the client relationship with Trump and the bank’s so-called Russian mirror trades affair, a person briefed on the matter said.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-05/deutsche-bank-is-said-to-have-received-subpoena-on-client-trump

:lol


Boom! :lol

DarrinS
12-05-2017, 12:45 PM
Brian Ross will no longer cover stories involving Trump. :lol


https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/media/2017/12/05/abc-says-ross-no-longer-cover-stories-involving-trump/923132001/

Pavlov
12-05-2017, 12:48 PM
An internal investigation carried out by Deutsche Bank didn’t yield any evidence of connections between the client relationship with Trump and the bank’s so-called Russian mirror trades affair, a person briefed on the matter said.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-05/deutsche-bank-is-said-to-have-received-subpoena-on-client-trump

:lolDeutsche Bank's record of internal investigations is sterling and unquestionable. :lol

I don't think Trump would be involved in the mirror trades anyway -- there were clearly other way to launder Russian money through his businesses.

BTW, ever get the balls to state your Flynn theory without your questions three games?

DarrinS
12-05-2017, 01:02 PM
Lol


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZfzCEJE414U

Pavlov
12-05-2017, 01:04 PM
Lol


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZfzCEJE414USo when is Sessions indicting Clinton?

baseline bum
12-05-2017, 01:12 PM
Brevity, and concise properly ordered arguments, are not my forte on an iPad and sports forum.

I will address all in a more complete fashion later today as work calls.

1st yes: Not even consulting the other party and using a procedure that assures a 50/50 split vote was extraordinary. But not now, as in under the Trump admin. There was a clear reason for 60 votes. It was good reasoning IMO. It allowed for legislation to take a while (not good) and be thoroughly debated for possible unintended outcomes. The later has been circumvented by writing in the margins. Now the Republicans totally own mistakes. Bad mistakes made in a margin writing rush to just pass anything. The same could not be said for Obamacare as it was very contentiously put out for the public and passed with known errors. Later on this with the taxes and affect on O care.


It's not in the least bit extraordinary. McConnell has been pulling his hyper partisan crap for the last nine years. No, this is normal. Maybe not historically, but this is normal judging by the last nine years. The Republican party has done nothing but encourage McConnell. No one in his right mind should be surprised McConnell's passing this with 50 votes when this piece of shit left a supreme court seat vacant for a year because he decided the president doesn't have the authority to nominate candidates any more.

boutons_deux
12-05-2017, 02:10 PM
Fox fans seethe after learning Mueller’s probe has cost $6.7 million — or roughly 7 Trump Mar-a-Lago trips

https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Press-hating-Trump-supporter-yells-at-journalists-at-Florida-rally-via-screencap-800x430.png

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s office on Tuesday released its first expense report, which showed that the probe so far has cost taxpayers $6.7 million (https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/363302-mueller-probes-expenses-totaled-3m-in-early-months).Per The Hill (https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/363302-mueller-probes-expenses-totaled-3m-in-early-months),

Mueller’s probe so far has paid out $3.2 million in direct and reimbursed expenditures —

including $1.7 million in salary and benefits — and

$3.5 million in expenditures “attributable to the investigations” themselves.

Fox News wrote up its own report on Mueller’s expenses so far with the headline, “Mueller’s Russia probe spent nearly $7M in first few months” — which quickly drew the ire of many of its fans on Twitter who consider the investigation to be a waste of taxpayer funds.

However, the Mueller probe’s total expenses match up roughly with what the U.S. government spent on President Donald Trump’s trips to his own Mar-a-
Lago resort in Florida over the first six months of his presidency.

As the Washington Post reported earlier this year, the U.S. Coast Guard spent $6.6 million protecting Mar-a-Lago during the president’s visits there in the first half of this year,

which is roughly what Mueller has spent so far to secure an indictment of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and a guilty plea from former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.

Nonetheless, the president’s supporters were outraged at Mueller’s purportedly pricey probe

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/fox-fans-seethe-after-learning-muellers-probe-has-cost-6-7-million-or-roughly-7-trump-mar-a-lago-trips/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

boutons_deux
12-05-2017, 02:18 PM
Mueller crosses Trash’s ‘red line’

Deutsche Bank has been asked to hand over data on accounts held by Trump and his family.

Trump has a two-decades-long relationship with Deutsche Bank.

During the 1990s, a string of bankruptcies (https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2015/06/donald-trump-companies-bankruptcy-atlantic-city) — including the infamous Taj Mahal casino in Atlantic City — made him toxic to most investors on Wall Street.

Deutsche Bank was one of the few exceptions, loaning him

more than $4 billion over 20 years, including a $640 million loan for the Trump International Hotel & Tower in Chicago — which he fell behind on payments for.

Between 2012 and 2015, Trump also borrowed over $300 million for hotels in Chicago, Washington D.C., and a Florida golf course.

Trump’s family is involved with Deutsche Bank as well.

In July, the New York Times (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/19/business/big-german-bank-key-to-trumps-finances-faces-new-scrutiny.html?_r=0)reported that Jared Kushner’s former family business, Kushner Companies, had received a $285 million loan form Deustche Bank in 2016.

Ivanka Trump is also reported to be a client.

Deutsche Bank, however, also has been in lawmakers’ crosshairs for its shady Russian ties.

This year the bank has paid more than $670 million in civil penalties

to regulators in both the U.S. and U.K.

over allegations that

it missed red flags :lol

in a trading scheme that allowed wealthy Russians to launder billions of dollars out of Moscow.

https://thinkprogress.org/mueller-crosses-trumps-red-line-subpoenas-his-personal-banking-records-022506ec07f9/

boutons_deux
12-05-2017, 02:33 PM
Huckabee Sanders' Old Tweet Hilariously Backfires By Castigating Trump (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/12/4/1721086/-Huckabee-Sanders-Old-Tweet-Hilariously-Backfires-By-Castigating-Trump)

https://images.dailykos.com/images/478543/story_image/sarah-huckabee-sanders-1-x750.jpg?1512012665


Sarah Sanders (https://twitter.com/SarahHuckabee)
(https://twitter.com/SarahHuckabee)✔@SarahHuckabee (https://twitter.com/SarahHuckabee)


When you're attacking FBI agents because you're under criminal investigation, you're losing https://twitter.com/politicalwire/status/794255050243801090 … (https://t.co/SIoAxatCjp)
1:12 PM - Nov 3, 2016 (https://twitter.com/SarahHuckabee/status/794255968448020480)

===================

Ted Lieu (https://twitter.com/tedlieu)
(https://twitter.com/tedlieu)✔@tedlieu (https://twitter.com/tedlieu)


I agree with @PressSec (https://twitter.com/PressSec) Sanders. https://twitter.com/SarahHuckabee/status/794255968448020480 … (https://t.co/Lj9YG1sJum)
12:42 AM - Dec 4, 2017 (https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/937572864282148864)

==================

Shelby Kent-Stewart@ShelbyKentStewa (https://twitter.com/ShelbyKentStewa)


BREAKING: Sarah Sanders murders irony. Film at 11. https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f447-1f3fc.pnghttps://twitter.com/SarahHuckabee/status/794255968448020480 … (https://t.co/aV3BhO1Fle)
9:07 PM - Dec 3, 2017 (https://twitter.com/ShelbyKentStewa/status/937518637014949888)

===============

John Toner@jptoner50 (https://twitter.com/jptoner50)


You gotta love a perfect evergreen tweet. Looking forward to the bullshit slung by @PressSec (https://twitter.com/PressSec) to explain today’s tweet tantrum.

#TrumpRussia (https://twitter.com/hashtag/TrumpRussia?src=hash) #ItsMuellerTime (https://twitter.com/hashtag/ItsMuellerTime?src=hash) https://twitter.com/sarahhuckabee/status/794255968448020480 … (https://t.co/Y9JcUnSlfV)

8:27 PM - Dec 3, 2017 (https://twitter.com/jptoner50/status/937508535306522624)

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/12/4/1721086/-Huckabee-Sanders-Old-Tweet-Hilariously-Backfires-By-Castigating-Trump?detail=emaildkre

boutons_deux
12-05-2017, 02:48 PM
Did White House Counsel Don McGahn Know Mike Flynn Misled The FBI? If So, How?

what appears to be discrepancy between McGahn’s account of their conversations, and what Yates and others close to her have said.

A key question is whether McGahn informed Trump — before Trump fired former FBI Director James Comey — that Flynn had given a false account to the FBI about discussing sanctions in a phone call with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak, and if so, how McGahn drew that inference.

Yates, who Trump fired from the DOJ for not defending his travel ban, said pointedly in congressional testimony under oath that she did discuss with McGahn the content of Flynn’s FBI interview. Other sources backed up that claim in the Washington Post’s and CNN’s most recent reports.

Yet, Trump’s personal attorney, John Dowd, told the Washington Post that

Yates indicated to McGahn that the FBI received “the same story [Flynn] gave the vice president.”

Dowd said Yates stopped short of accusing Flynn of lying to the FBI.

“For some reason, the Department didn’t want to make an accusation of lying,” Dowd told the Post.

“The agents thought Flynn was confused.” :lol

An unnamed source described as “familiar with the matter” told CNN that based on McGahn’s conversation with Yates,

McGahn told Trump that he believed Flynn had misled the FBI as well as Pence.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/mcgahn-flynn-misled-fbi?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20tpm-news%20%28TPMNews%29

TSA
12-05-2017, 02:57 PM
938126764274044930
:lol

spurraider21
12-05-2017, 03:03 PM
:lol source with knowledge
:lol anonymous sources

oh wait we like those now

Pavlov
12-05-2017, 03:03 PM
938126764274044930
:lolHey, TSAbot is back!

Still no Flynn theory?

:lol

TSA
12-05-2017, 03:03 PM
New York Times forced to heavily amend another supposed K.T. McFarland 'scoop'

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/new-york-times-forced-to-heavily-amend-another-supposed-kt-mcfarland-scoop/article/2642586

:lol

boutons_deux
12-05-2017, 03:03 PM
one of Colbert's best monologues

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlMFNhPUfPI

TSA
12-05-2017, 03:05 PM
:lol source with knowledge
:lol anonymous sources

oh wait we like those now

I think they were subpoenaed. The amount of shit reporting surrounding this is astounding.

Pavlov
12-05-2017, 03:06 PM
New York Times forced to heavily amend another supposed K.T. McFarland 'scoop'

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/new-york-times-forced-to-heavily-amend-another-supposed-kt-mcfarland-scoop/article/2642586

:lolHey, TSAbot is back!

Still no Flynn theory?

:lol

Pavlov
12-05-2017, 03:08 PM
I think they were subpoenaed. The amount of shit reporting surrounding this is astounding.Yet you post anonymous 4chan conspiracy theories as gospel.

Astounding.

TSA
12-05-2017, 03:13 PM
:lol source with knowledge
:lol anonymous sources

oh wait we like those now

938137118819397632
:lol

boutons_deux
12-05-2017, 03:18 PM
NYT and ABC "corrections" have FUCK ALL to do with Mueller's bulldozer

spurraider21
12-05-2017, 03:34 PM
938137118819397632
:lol
I have no issue with waiting things out until facts clear up. Just pointing out your flip flopping on anonymous sourcing

FuzzyLumpkins
12-05-2017, 03:36 PM
I have no issue with waiting things out until facts clear up. Just pointing out your flip flopping on anonymous sourcing

Remember when Trump's lawyers kept trying to tell us that Trump was not under investigation? The boat where they were reliable sources sailed quite some time ago.

Pavlov
12-05-2017, 03:37 PM
Why would the bank be under any obligation to tell the 700 Club lawyer anything?

boutons_deux
12-05-2017, 03:38 PM
Mueller, or Schneiderman (state (financial) felonies not pardonable by Pres :lol) will DEFINITELY go after DB, as DB has already settled for many $100Ms for money-laundering crimes with Russia.

SpursforSix
12-05-2017, 03:40 PM
Mueller, or Schneiderman (state (financial) felonies not pardonable by Pres :lol) will DEFINITELY go after DB, as DB has already settle for money-laundering crimes with Russia.

Hmmmm...what we know of Mueller pretty much confirms that BigAg is in the driver's seat.

Reck
12-05-2017, 03:43 PM
TSA relegated to reposting Fox news and Jay Sekulow now. :lol

FuzzyLumpkins
12-05-2017, 03:48 PM
Judicial Watch, National Review, Fox News, Breitbart, Project Veritas, Daily Caller, Washington Examiner

It's like our local GOP sycophants don't understand the notion of objective journalism.

It provides a nice counterpoint to their claims of MSM!

boutons_deux
12-05-2017, 05:09 PM
https://media.newyorker.com/cartoons/5a26cee3e9768145f837c162/master/w_649,c_limit/DC120517.jpg

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 05:26 PM
938169872848248834
But adoptions

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 05:27 PM
938171159136342016

Pavlov
12-05-2017, 05:33 PM
But her Brian Ross!

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 06:07 PM
938182495513792513

Reck
12-05-2017, 06:09 PM
938182495513792513
TSA (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=7640), whats your take on this? Hurry up and get your 4chan talking point.

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 06:21 PM
938177465608007680

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 06:23 PM
938186291203723264
Damn TSA gettin his doo doo hole wrecked.

dabom
12-05-2017, 06:23 PM
Boom X5.

boutons_deux
12-05-2017, 06:27 PM
Damn TSA gettin his doo doo hole wrecked.

... for believing the WH lawyers.

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 06:30 PM
875860257863593985
Deutsche Bank, a major Russian money laundering bank.

"Way back when they didn't want me. Now im hot they all up on me."

TSA
12-05-2017, 07:35 PM
TSA (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=7640), whats your take on this? Hurry up and get your 4chan talking point.

My take on it is the same take from the previous page dummy


I think they were subpoenaed. The amount of shit reporting surrounding this is astounding.

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 07:41 PM
938199919071977472
:lmao

Reck
12-05-2017, 07:47 PM
Little Gates in more trouble.
938187619996971008

DarrinS
12-05-2017, 08:33 PM
Little Gates in more trouble.
938187619996971008


Never heard of him.

pgardn
12-05-2017, 08:35 PM
It's not in the least bit extraordinary. McConnell has been pulling his hyper partisan crap for the last nine years. No, this is normal. Maybe not historically, but this is normal judging by the last nine years. The Republican party has done nothing but encourage McConnell. No one in his right mind should be surprised McConnell's passing this with 50 votes when this piece of shit left a supreme court seat vacant for a year because he decided the president doesn't have the authority to nominate candidates any more.

No, I feel you on the blocking legislation that Obama favored.

McConnel stated this was a goal, simply block Obama on anything. This is why Obama used so many presidential maneuvers that can now be undone. I'm talking about passing legislation with only 50 votes, as you have a president that will sign anything for any win. MMconnell could not get it done on axing o care. They are bypassing anything bipartisan by the reconciliation procedure to try and rush anything through. The Republicans are using the reconciliation method, clever legislators can use in many different situations now, like repealing Obamacare (did not work). Also used by Bush for the stated reasons and under very diff circumstances compared to the present without so much secrecy. Very different IMO at the time.

I will return with the second yes.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-05-2017, 08:36 PM
Never heard of him.

Your ignorance is unsurprising but I'll help. He was a deputy campaign manager for Trump.

DarrinS
12-05-2017, 08:39 PM
Your ignorance is unsurprising but I'll help. He was a deputy campaign manager for Trump.

I guess he gonna wear a wire, flip, etc. etc.

spurraider21
12-05-2017, 08:40 PM
I guess he gonna wear a wire, flip, etc. etc.
No hes just some guy that volunteered

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 08:47 PM
Darrin seems scared.

Chucho
12-05-2017, 08:56 PM
So...what's all the ballyhoo about Mueller agents being compromised?

FuzzyLumpkins
12-05-2017, 08:58 PM
I guess he gonna wear a wire, flip, etc. etc.

I don't really care what he does. They already have bigger fish flipping. I would not be surprised if he flipped though. He is getting indicted for felonious criminal activity.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-05-2017, 08:59 PM
So...what's all the ballyhoo about Mueller agents being compromised?

They found an FBI agent that tweeted against Trump and are trying to say that is grounds for calling the whole thing off.

Chucho
12-05-2017, 09:00 PM
Nevermind, looks like a biased Agent got removed from the investigation for anti-Trump texts.

Chucho
12-05-2017, 09:03 PM
It's a God damned shame how dysfunctional and segmented our legal system and the factions within.

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 09:03 PM
They found an FBI agent that tweeted against Trump and are trying to say that is grounds for calling the whole thing off.

Its funny because they never mentioned Pompeo or the fact that Sessions lied under oath, not that bothers the Trump crew

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 09:04 PM
It's a God damned shame how dysfunctional and segmented our legal system and the factions within.

What factions?

FuzzyLumpkins
12-05-2017, 09:04 PM
It's a God damned shame how dysfunctional and segmented our legal system and the factions within.

People are individuals: oh the humanity!

Chucho
12-05-2017, 09:05 PM
What factions?

The different departments/organizations.

Chucho
12-05-2017, 09:05 PM
People are individuals: oh the humanity!

So, because people are individuals, partisanship and political beliefs should affect how the law is administered?

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 09:06 PM
The different departments/organizations.

What specific department or organization are you talking about?

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 09:07 PM
So, because people are individuals, partisanship and political beliefs should affect how the law is administered?

The problem wasn't with him having his own personal opinion. It was with him expressing it. That's the only fault.

Chucho
12-05-2017, 09:10 PM
The problem wasn't with him having his own personal opinion. It was with him expressing it. That's the only fault.

So, a person with a bias can be objective and administrate the law in an objective, and just, manner?

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 09:13 PM
So, a person with a bias can be objective and administrate the law in an objective, and just, manner?

Having an opinion and being biased are the same thing?

Chucho
12-05-2017, 09:18 PM
Having an opinion and being biased are the same thing?

Wow.

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 09:21 PM
Wow.

You didn't answer the question. You can have an opinion while still recognizing that person or individual has rights and has the right to due process.

Chucho
12-05-2017, 09:25 PM
You didn't answer the question. You can have an opinion while still recognizing that person or individual has rights and has the right to due process.

No need. Got all I need from you. And LOLing about you promoting due process in this thread.

Oh lordy...

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 09:27 PM
No need. Got all I need from you. And LOLing about you promoting due process in this thread.

Oh lordy...

So having an opinion means you are biased? You'd have to be a stupid motherfucker to believe no one in any federal law enforcement agency don't have opinions. I'm not the one arguing witch hunt...

FuzzyLumpkins
12-05-2017, 09:30 PM
So, because people are individuals, partisanship and political beliefs should affect how the law is administered?

It was a text not an arrest, dim.

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 09:32 PM
It was a text not an arrest, dim.

Let the dipshit think he is smart.

Chucho
12-05-2017, 09:33 PM
So having an opinion means you are biased? You'd have to be a stupid motherfucker to believe no one in any federal law enforcement agencies don't have opinions.

Donating to a specific party denotes bias. You don't agree?

Chucho
12-05-2017, 09:33 PM
Let the dipshit think he is smart.

LOL, Leftist Chris.

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 09:35 PM
Donating to a specific party denotes bias. You don't agree?

Trump donated to Hillary. Does that make him biased? :lmao

Gray named Spur fans these days

Chucho
12-05-2017, 09:36 PM
Tunnel vision has you assuming I'm talking about only Strzok. Good work, fellas.

Chucho
12-05-2017, 09:37 PM
Trump donated to Hillary. Does that make him biased? :lmao

Gray named Spur fans these days

LOL Mr. "Pick a Side" Leftist Chris trying to hit me with ST cred insults. Stick to your Tweet posting.

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 09:38 PM
Guys, the FBI is so politicized that they turned down an illegal attempt by the President to obstruct justice.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-05-2017, 09:43 PM
Tunnel vision has you assuming I'm talking about only Strzok. Good work, fellas.

Given the context of the conversation to this point there is no reason to think otherwise.

Your dumbass was asking about what was going on in the news cycle in starting this thread. There are no other examples particularly within the investigations leadership.

DarrinS
12-05-2017, 09:44 PM
It was a text not an arrest, dim.

Oh, I thought he was talking about the other one who wrote a fan email to Sally Yates.

Chucho
12-05-2017, 09:44 PM
Given the context of the conversation to this point there is no reason to think otherwise.

Your dumbass was asking about what was going on in the news cycle in starting this thread. There are no other examples particularly within the investigations leadership.

And the Mueller team composite.

djohn2oo8
12-05-2017, 09:45 PM
Oh, I thought he was talking about the other one who wrote a fan email to Sally Yates.

Or Pompeo spreading Wikileak documents?

Reck
12-05-2017, 09:52 PM
Tunnel vision has you assuming I'm talking about only Strzok. Good work, fellas.

Might you be talking about McCabe?

Here's the deal according to Politifacts.


At the time of the contribution, the candidate's husband was not directly involved in the FBI probe of Clinton's email server, according to the FBI. The bureau says that by the time he had some oversight role in the Clinton investigation, the election involving his wife had been over for three months.


In 2015, Dr. Jill McCabe, a pediatrician, was recruited to run for one of the 40 seats (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senate_of_Virginia) in the Virginia's Republican-controlled Senate by Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe, who co-chaired Bill Clinton's 1996 re-election campaign and chaired Hillary Clinton's unsuccessful 2008 run for president.


According to the Wall Street Journal (http://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton-ally-aids-campaign-of-fbi-officials-wife-1477266114), which broke the story, McAuliffe and other Virginia Democrats met with McCabe and her husband, Andrew, on March 7, 2015, to urge her to run as part of an effort to take back the Senate.


At the time, Andrew McCabe was assistant director (https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-announces-executive-appointments-1) of the FBI's field office in Washington and had focused much of his career on terrorism.


The FBI released a statement that Andrew McCabe "consulted with top FBI headquarters and field office ethics officers for guidance, including briefings on the Hatch Act, to prevent against any actual or potential conflict-of-interest, in the event she decided to go forward."



Rest here:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/oct/26/donald-trump/facts-dispute-donald-trumps-claim-donation-fbi-spo/

It's a hard and complicated call to make. You dont know where you're going to end up being a year or two years down the road so. This guy got promoted after the fact as well so it's not like the FBI didn't know about possible conflict of interest.

FuzzyLumpkins
12-05-2017, 11:00 PM
Oh, I thought he was talking about the other one who wrote a fan email to Sally Yates.

Sally Yates was his boss as AG was she not?

DarrinS
12-05-2017, 11:47 PM
You missed one, Aaron. Get to work.

AaronY
12-05-2017, 11:49 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQUWEEjXkAATzvE?format=jpg&name=orig

koriwhat
12-05-2017, 11:50 PM
It's going to be great when the head of hildebeast is on a spike for all to see.

AaronY
12-05-2017, 11:51 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQUWEEjXkAATzvE?format=jpg&name=orig

It's going to be great when the head of hildebeast is on a spike for all to see.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQUWEEjXkAATzvE?format=jpg&name=orig

AaronY
12-05-2017, 11:53 PM
Dang can't leave visitor message on koriwhats page. Shame.

koriwhat
12-05-2017, 11:54 PM
Dang can't leave visitor message on koriwhats page. Shame.

Wont let you suck my dick either so fuck off!

koriwhat
12-05-2017, 11:55 PM
It doesnt go down in the DMs!

AaronY
12-05-2017, 11:57 PM
Wont let you suck my dick either so fuck off!
https://i.imgur.com/kKmu3QO.png
Sad trombone

baseline bum
12-06-2017, 08:16 AM
No, I feel you on the blocking legislation that Obama favored.

McConnel stated this was a goal, simply block Obama on anything. This is why Obama used so many presidential maneuvers that can now be undone. I'm talking about passing legislation with only 50 votes, as you have a president that will sign anything for any win. MMconnell could not get it done on axing o care. They are bypassing anything bipartisan by the reconciliation procedure to try and rush anything through. The Republicans are using the reconciliation method, clever legislators can use in many different situations now, like repealing Obamacare (did not work). Also used by Bush for the stated reasons and under very diff circumstances compared to the present without so much secrecy. Very different IMO at the time.

I will return with the second yes.

McConnell and the GOP going it alone is dog bites man.

boutons_deux
12-06-2017, 09:04 AM
WH, Fox gaslighting the world

Did Mueller subpoena Deutsche Bank? Fox and Trump say no, everyone else says yes (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/12/5/1721460/-Did-Mueller-subpoena-Deutsche-Bank-Fox-and-Trump-say-no-everyone-else-says-yes)

The German business newspaper Handelsblatt (http://www.handelsblatt.com/) appears to have been the first to report that special counsel Robert Mueller had subpoenaed records from Deutsche Bank related to Donald Trump’s frequent, and large, dealings with the bank.

Reuters broke the story on Tuesday morning.

ABC News was close behind, citing their own source (http://abcnews.go.com/US/mueller-issues-subpoena-deutsche-bank-russia-probe/story?id=51586918).

Bloomberg also reported the story (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-05/deutsche-bank-is-said-to-have-received-subpoena-on-client-trump), citing “a person briefed on the matter,” and

the Wall Street Journal followed soon after, making a similar citation (https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-deutsche-bank-records-subpoenaed-by-mueller-1512480154).

Bloomberg followed up with Handelsblatt (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-05/deutsche-bank-is-said-to-have-received-subpoena-on-client-trump)...

When approached about the Dowd comment, the person familiar with the matter reiterated that the bank had received a subpoena. Handelsblatt reported the subpoena earlier Tuesday.


The Wall Street Journal added details, indicating that the subpoena had been issued “in the fall” and reporting the denial by Trump’s legal team, while continuing to report the possible results (https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-deutsche-bank-records-subpoenaed-by-mueller-1512480154).

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1721460

:lol

TSA
12-06-2017, 10:17 AM
Let me tell you something about IRS that may not be common knowledge.

They do random compliance audits (people know this) and the larger you are (the more income you earn), the more likely you are to be audited. Large, massive corporations and companies in excess of $10 million (like the ones Trump owns)? Yeah many of them get audited every year by IRS (LB&I, formally LMSB).

When I say audited I am not talking about a CP series/correspondence audit. I am talking office or field audits. It isn't hyperbole to say some of these companies/businesses go ahead and clear out office space for IRS employees to work.

Not a tax technician or examiner (paid dirt) or even a low level revenue agent (paid slightly more than dirt). These people tend to be sharp.

Trump has said in the past, if memory serves, that he has been audited every year going back a long time. That sounds in line with what I would expect.

The idea that Mueller is going to uncover some massive scheme Trump was somehow hiding from the world for all these years when he was in the public spot light, a man with exceedingly large business entities who has been audited by the IRS, annually, for many, many years, and who employs some of the best attorneys and accountants in the country?

Pavlov
12-06-2017, 10:25 AM
:lol TSAbot

RandomGuy
12-06-2017, 01:24 PM
WH, Fox gaslighting the world

Did Mueller subpoena Deutsche Bank? Fox and Trump say no, everyone else says yes (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/12/5/1721460/-Did-Mueller-subpoena-Deutsche-Bank-Fox-and-Trump-say-no-everyone-else-says-yes)

The German business newspaper Handelsblatt (http://www.handelsblatt.com/) appears to have been the first to report that special counsel Robert Mueller had subpoenaed records from Deutsche Bank related to Donald Trump’s frequent, and large, dealings with the bank.

Reuters broke the story on Tuesday morning.

ABC News was close behind, citing their own source (http://abcnews.go.com/US/mueller-issues-subpoena-deutsche-bank-russia-probe/story?id=51586918).

Bloomberg also reported the story (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-05/deutsche-bank-is-said-to-have-received-subpoena-on-client-trump), citing “a person briefed on the matter,” and

the Wall Street Journal followed soon after, making a similar citation (https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-deutsche-bank-records-subpoenaed-by-mueller-1512480154).

Bloomberg followed up with Handelsblatt (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-05/deutsche-bank-is-said-to-have-received-subpoena-on-client-trump)...

When approached about the Dowd comment, the person familiar with the matter reiterated that the bank had received a subpoena. Handelsblatt reported the subpoena earlier Tuesday.


The Wall Street Journal added details, indicating that the subpoena had been issued “in the fall” and reporting the denial by Trump’s legal team, while continuing to report the possible results (https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-deutsche-bank-records-subpoenaed-by-mueller-1512480154).

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1721460

:lol



Sie sind schon Mitglied? Jetzt einloggen

Thats' funny. "einloggen" is the German version here if "log in".

RandomGuy
12-06-2017, 01:30 PM
"Die Deutsche Bank hatte sich vor Vorliegen der offiziellen Vorladung aber geweigert, Auskünfte zu geben und verwies darauf, dass sie damit gegen US-Gesetze verstoßen würde."
Roughly:
DB refused comment on the official (request? matters?) because it would be against US laws to do so.


Trumps lawyers said that the Bank didn't provide anything. My guess is that they thought this meant the Bank didn't provide anything to Mueller.

RandomGuy
12-06-2017, 01:36 PM
938177465608007680

... and that is the bright red line. If Trump is going to axe the special prosecutor that will be why.

As I have said all along the proof will be in his business dealings. I have at this point no doubt that cash-strapped, unethical Trump looked the other way in some of his dealings, and that support from Russia, or Russian oligarchs is what is causing him to behave as if he is compromised.

Also as I previously noted, I think that Mueller is getting some "under the table" help from US intelligence, who has surely noticed that Trump is behaving as if he is compromised.

Reck
12-06-2017, 01:41 PM
938474187743735808

:lol TSA

RandomGuy
12-06-2017, 01:44 PM
:lol TSAbot

What TSAbot's author is missing:

That auditor was looking for evidence of evasion of US tax laws. Mueller's scope is much, much wider and vastly different.

Structuring a series of transactions in a way that minimizes taxes and is compliant with tax code does not mean that series of transactions won't be very meaningful to a prosecutor attempting to "connect the dots".

If one assumes that prosecutor also is getting help from US intelligence, both the scope, aim, and depth of information available to Mueller's team is going vastly beyond any IRS audit.

RandomGuy
12-06-2017, 01:52 PM
An internal investigation carried out by Deutsche Bank didn’t yield any evidence of connections between the client relationship with Trump and the bank’s so-called Russian mirror trades affair, a person briefed on the matter said.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-05/deutsche-bank-is-said-to-have-received-subpoena-on-client-trump

:lol

One would not expect that to be the case. Mirror trades involve stocks and mutual funds. Trump's real estate dealings would not really be structured to do that.

There are many ways to launder money more suited to real estate companies, with the obvious example of overpaying for a dumpy mansion, then forming an LLC to split the asset and get money out of it at sale coming to mind. The US partner would then get a hefty tax loss if you structure it right, which is very easy given LLC rules.

djohn2oo8
12-06-2017, 02:02 PM
938469965023367168

djohn2oo8
12-06-2017, 02:02 PM
938475916887543809

koriwhat
12-06-2017, 02:03 PM
https://i.imgur.com/kKmu3QO.png
Sad trombone

Oh no im not important like arron with his fake online groupies.fucking loser!

djohn2oo8
12-06-2017, 02:03 PM
938476157250531329

djohn2oo8
12-06-2017, 02:06 PM
938471140892270592

TSA
12-06-2017, 02:11 PM
NSA head Mike Rogers has all the goods and you all quickly forget who's side he's on. Have any of you ever stopped to think how Trump is always a step ahead?

djohn2oo8
12-06-2017, 02:12 PM
NSA head Mike Rogers has all the goods and you all quickly forget who's side he's on. Have any of you ever stopped to think how Trump is always a step ahead?

Lol Trump is always ahead? He had no idea Flynns plea bargain was coming :lmao

TSA
12-06-2017, 02:12 PM
Trump, Rogers, Flynn, DIA spooks all working in concert to expose the corrupt FBI and CIA.
It's a beautiful thing to witness.

boutons_deux
12-06-2017, 02:15 PM
Flashback: Watch Sean Spicer lie and say

Flynn’s illegal sanctions call was ‘holiday greetings’ to Russia

https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/spicer1-800x430.jpg

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/flashback-watch-sean-spicer-lie-and-say-flynns-illegal-sanctions-call-was-holiday-greetings-to-russia/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

Pavlov
12-06-2017, 02:17 PM
NSA head Mike Rogers has all the goods and you all quickly forget who's side he's on. Have any of you ever stopped to think how Trump is always a step ahead?


Trump, Rogers, Flynn, DIA spooks all working in concert to expose the corrupt FBI and CIA.
It's a beautiful thing to witness.Yeah, you're too chickenshit to give us your intentional felony commission theory, TSA.

Your being a total pussy is a beautiful thing to witness.

TSA
12-06-2017, 03:03 PM
Yeah, you're too chickenshit to give us your intentional felony commission theory, TSA.

Your being a total pussy is a beautiful thing to witness.

The question you dodged made my theory clear.

Flynn being charged with the felony allows his NDA from his previous security clearance/position to be lifted and now in court and he can testify on any and all know crimes.

Pavlov
12-06-2017, 03:13 PM
The question you dodged made my theory clear.

Flynn being charged with the felony allows his NDA from his previous security clearance/position to be lifted and now in court and he can testify on any and all know crimes.So he planned to commit and be convicted of a felony all along.

This is your theory.

:lol

baseline bum
12-06-2017, 03:15 PM
So he planned to commit and be convicted of a felony all along.

This is your theory.

:lol

Susan Rice indictment incoming

Reck
12-06-2017, 03:35 PM
TSA has lost complete touch with reality.

We're beyond 4channeling here. :lol

RandomGuy
12-06-2017, 03:38 PM
NSA head Mike Rogers has all the goods and you all quickly forget who's side he's on. Have any of you ever stopped to think how Trump is always a step ahead?

:lmao

Trump is a "step ahead".

Keep telling yourself that.

RandomGuy
12-06-2017, 03:40 PM
TSA has lost complete touch with reality.

We're beyond 4channeling here. :lol

He doesn't even believe his shit anymore. He is a good sport for trying through, you gotta give him that. Dude is like Kelly Ann in that way.

One has to wonder where she hid the horcruxes.

DarrinS
12-06-2017, 04:35 PM
House narrowly defeats impeachment resolution






























364-58 :lmao

Chris
12-06-2017, 05:07 PM
Another One! Mueller Deputy Was Personal Attorney of Ben Rhodes, Represented Clinton Foundation

https://static.pjmedia.com/trending/user-content/51/files/2017/12/Jeannie-Rhee.sized-770x415xc.jpg


On Fox News Tuesday night, Laura Ingraham reported that yet another one of Robert Mueller's deputies in his Russia investigation is compromised due to her track record as a blatant partisan.

Jeannie Rhee, who was hired by Mueller last summer to work on the probe, was the personal attorney of Ben Rhodes and also represented the Clinton Foundation, Ingraham revealed. "This information will put further pressure on Special Prosecutor Bob Mueller to resign."

Rhee is the third member of the Mueller team this week who has been shown to be brazenly partisan. Two other members of the team have been revealed as highly questionable hires in recent days as well — Peter Strzok, an anti-Trumper who helped exonerate Hillary Clinton, and Andrew Weissmann, an unscrupulous prosecutor who told outgoing acting Attorney General Sally Yates in an email that he was "proud" of her for defying President Trump's travel ban.

As bad as Strzok and Weissman are, Jeannie Rhee takes the cake.

938245789347930112

She formerly worked in the Obama Justice Department as a deputy assistant attorney general in the Office of Legal Counsel, according to Fox News. Rhee was also the personal attorney for Ben "echo chamber" Rhodes, and the deputy national security adviser for President Barack Obama.

This could be a significant development because according to a report by Adam Kredo in the Washington Free Beacon last February, deep-state loyalists led by Rhodes had been working diligently behind the scenes to undermine the Trump White House and orchestrate the ouster of Michael Flynn, a strong opponent of the Iran nuclear deal.

Rhee was almost certainly part of that effort.

The operation primarily focused on discrediting Flynn, an opponent of the Iran nuclear deal, in order to handicap the Trump administration's efforts to disclose secret details of the nuclear deal with Iran that had been long hidden by the Obama administration.

Insiders familiar with the anti-Flynn campaign told the Free Beacon that these Obama loyalists plotted in the months before Trump's inauguration to establish a set of roadblocks before Trump's national security team, which includes several prominent opponents of diplomacy with Iran. The Free Beacon first reported on this effort in January.

According to Free Beacon's multiple sources, "top members of the Obama administration's national security team launched a communications infrastructure after they left the White House," and even told reporters that they were "using that infrastructure to undermine Trump's foreign policy":

"It's actually Ben Rhodes, NIAC, and the Iranian mullahs who are celebrating today," said one veteran foreign policy insider who is close to Flynn and the White House. "They know that the number one target is Iran … [and] they all knew their little sacred agreement with Iran was going to go off the books. So they got rid of Flynn before any of the [secret] agreements even surfaced."
Flynn had been preparing to publicize many of the details about the nuclear deal that had been intentionally hidden by the Obama administration as part of its effort to garner support for the deal, these sources said.

Flynn is now "gone before anybody can see what happened" with these secret agreements, said the second insider close to Flynn and the White House.

According to a well-placed source who was involved in the 2015 fight over the Iran deal, the Obama administration was afraid that Flynn would expose the secret agreements with Iran.

Rhee, Ingraham noted, was Rhodes' "point of contact with the House Intel Committee in its investigation into Russia." She didn't appear with Rhodes at his closed-door hearing with House investigators in October because she was already working with Mueller, Ingraham said.

The host went on to report that Rhee "represented the Clinton Foundation and donated about $9,000 to Hillary and her fellow Democrats." She also worked in private practice with controversial legal bulldog Weissmann, according to Ingraham.

"Let's face it. What we're seeing here is a pattern and practice of Mueller hiring known Clinton and Obama political insiders and boosters, supporters to undo a presidential election — that was the election of Donald Trump," Ingraham declared.

"What Mueller did -- he hired a pedigree team of obvious partisans," she said. "A revolving door from working for political opponents of Trump to working on the investigation into Trump and his supposed Russian ties.... They should all step aside ... including Bob Mueller," she concluded.

s_cNgJuKugE

https://pjmedia.com/trending/another-one-mueller-deputy-personal-attorney-ben-rhodes-represented-clinton-foundation/

dabom
12-06-2017, 05:09 PM
I guess the president can just fire him. :lmao

Chris
12-06-2017, 05:14 PM
Mueller's goon squad getting exposed :lol Conflicts of interest :lol Mueller time :lol

Reck
12-06-2017, 05:14 PM
House narrowly defeats impeachment resolution






























364-58 :lmao

Are you a retard? Impeachment proceedings is a long ways away from now.

This one was a lone effort from All fucking Green and it still was serious enough that people had to vote on it.

:lol Not even a year in and you already have people voting on whether the president should be impeached or not. Embarrassing.

djohn2oo8
12-06-2017, 05:17 PM
Darrin Chris and TSA seem worried.

Chris
12-06-2017, 05:18 PM
it still was serious enough that people had to vote on it.

:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao





















































































































































































































:lmao

djohn2oo8
12-06-2017, 05:23 PM
What are you worried about Chris?

Pavlov
12-06-2017, 05:26 PM
Another One! Mueller Deputy Was Personal Attorney of Ben Rhodes, Represented Clinton Foundation

https://static.pjmedia.com/trending/user-content/51/files/2017/12/Jeannie-Rhee.sized-770x415xc.jpg:lol This was known a long time ago.

Why are people acting like they just found out?

If there are no crimes -- why is everyone so afraid of attorney bias?

boutons_deux
12-06-2017, 05:33 PM
Fox and Repugs, text book autocrats, warring on law enforcement, but only that LE which threatens their power.

But Fox and Repugs 100% support LE harassing, brutalizing, slaughtering blacks.

Chris
12-06-2017, 05:35 PM
https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/24852180_1399100046883488_8558255272038626383_n.pn g?oh=d43cdd378cdf616c5cce28c21193c117&oe=5AD6B502


/fdisk Democratic party

dabom
12-06-2017, 05:37 PM
Can we all agree that Mueller just getting started? :lol

That's facts guys. You can't change reality. :lol

djohn2oo8
12-06-2017, 05:38 PM
Can we all agree that Mueller just getting started? :lol

That's facts guys. You can't change reality. :lol

They are unhinged and i'm loving it.

TSA
12-06-2017, 05:49 PM
So he planned to commit and be convicted of a felony all along.

This is your theory.

:lol

Yup.

He already knew there were transcripts of his calls to Kislyak as they'd been leaked by the WaPo. He lied on purpose to Strzok during his interview and now has his NDA lifted and will be able to talk about any and all crimes.

The trap has been set and Mueller's team is now the target, along with every other corrupt agent in the FBI, CIA, and congress.

TSA
12-06-2017, 05:50 PM
Darrin Chris and TSA seem worried.

Not in the least bit. The curtain is being pulled back...sit back and enjoy the show.

TSA
12-06-2017, 05:52 PM
I can't wait for the OIG investigation report to come out.

RandomGuy
12-06-2017, 05:52 PM
Yup.

He already knew there were transcripts of his calls to Kislyak as they'd been leaked by the WaPo. He lied on purpose to Strzok during his interview and now has his NDA lifted and will be able to talk about any and all crimes.

The trap has been set and Mueller's team is now the target, along with every other corrupt agent in the FBI, CIA, and congress.

More Germans now see their country’s relationship with Washington as a larger foreign policy challenge than the threat posed by North Korea or Iran, according to a survey commissioned by the Körber Foundation in October.

Reck
12-06-2017, 05:52 PM
:lmao

Pavlov
12-06-2017, 05:52 PM
Yup.

He already knew there were transcripts of his calls to Kislyak as they'd been leaked by the WaPo. He lied on purpose to Strzok during his interview and now has his NDA lifted and will be able to talk about any and all crimes.

The trap has been set and Mueller's team is now the target, along with every other corrupt agent in the FBI, CIA, and congress.:lmao

He's targeting Mueller's team by cooperating with Mueller's team.

Dude, you should really read your posts out loud before you hit reply.

Pavlov
12-06-2017, 05:53 PM
I can't wait for the OIG investigation report to come out.Remember remember all the other reports and testimonies you couldn't wait to come out?

RandomGuy
12-06-2017, 05:53 PM
I can't wait for the OIG investigation report to come out.

Part of that must include a renewed commitment to Europe, along the lines of the French president’s vision for “a more integrated Europe” as the path to “real sovereignty.”

Mr. Gabriel’s remarks deepened the acknowledgment of that widening divide between the United States and Europe.

But they also highlighted a vacuum of leadership among the once-tightly knit phalanx of like-minded Western nations, as the United States increasingly appears to be jettisoning that role.

As the United States withdraws, no one has looked to Europe to fill the void, Mr. Gabriel said. Instead, he warned, that space was being filled by Russia in the Middle East and by China in Africa.

RandomGuy
12-06-2017, 05:57 PM
Are you a retard? Impeachment proceedings is a long ways away from now.

This one was a lone effort from All fucking Green and it still was serious enough that people had to vote on it.

:lol Not even a year in and you already have people voting on whether the president should be impeached or not. Embarrassing.

Eyup. No one thought that was going anywhere. Not until Mueller is done digging up the skeletons.

RandomGuy
12-06-2017, 05:58 PM
Yup.

He already knew there were transcripts of his calls to Kislyak as they'd been leaked by the WaPo. He lied on purpose to Strzok during his interview and now has his NDA lifted and will be able to talk about any and all crimes.

The trap has been set and Mueller's team is now the target, along with every other corrupt agent in the FBI, CIA, and congress.

Wow. You've lost it.

Really, really lost it.

It's almost as if you know Trump is going down in flames and don't care anymore.

djohn2oo8
12-06-2017, 06:00 PM
Not in the least bit. The curtain is being pulled back...sit back and enjoy the show.

If you aren't worried, why are you here?

RandomGuy
12-06-2017, 06:00 PM
https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/24852180_1399100046883488_8558255272038626383_n.pn g?oh=d43cdd378cdf616c5cce28c21193c117&oe=5AD6B502


/fdisk Democratic party

:lmao

Windows 95? Dude, my grandma has better meme skillz. Even as a troll, you suck. Up your game man.

RandomGuy
12-06-2017, 06:01 PM
If you aren't worried, why are you here?

He is very obviously trying to get the news buried.

TSA
12-06-2017, 06:01 PM
:lmao

He's targeting Mueller's team by cooperating with Mueller's team.

Dude, you should really read your posts out loud before you hit reply.

You should really read your posts out load before you hit reply. I never said Flynn was targeting Mueller's team, that would be Trump ally Mike Rogers and the NSA. How do you think Strzok's texts were found? Flynn hasn't even testified in court yet, that is when the real fun begins.