Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[Kim Jong-il]

TSA apparently still doesn't know a President cannot order a wiretap.
Infowars says that Obama can and did. Also that liberals are putting chemicals in the water supply to turn frogs gay. So, you know, legit stuff.

[TSA]

TSA apparently still doesn't know a President cannot order a wiretap.

What part of 50 U.S. Code § 1802 are you having trouble with today? The President can order surveillance without a court order. FACT.

[Reck]

He most certainly cant order it by himself.


The President may authorize, through the Attorney General (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attorney_General), electronic surveillance without a court order for the period of one year.


The Attorney General is required to make a certification of these conditions under seal to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Court),[11] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Act#cite_note-reportfiscunderseal-11) and report on their compliance to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._House_Permanent_Select_Committee_on_Intellige nce) and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Senate_Select_Committee_on_Intelligence).[12] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Act#cite_note-reportcongresscompliance-12)

[TSA]

:lol quoting supporting evidence of the President being able to order surveillance without a court order.

[Reck]

Through his AG. :lmao

Just like he cant order wiretaps, he cant order surveilance by himself. He does it through the Attorney General. How fucking stupid are you, guy?

[spurraider21]

This shit again. I've made it very clear that this statute DOES NOT APPLY to surveillance of trump or any American

[Reck]

This shit again. I've made it very clear that this statute DOES NOT APPLY to surveillance of trump or any American

You're in law, right?

Can the prez himself, order a wiretap or order surveillance without the attorney general?

That's what TSA is still hunged up on. He thinks the president can personally do it without the check and balance.

[boutons_deux]

why would NSA NOT tap Trash tower, with bank of china and russian mafiya etc in there?

Clapper was exposed as liar, and NSA taps anything and everything at anytime they want

[spurraider21]

You're in law, right?

Can the prez himself, order a wiretap or order surveillance without the attorney general?

That's what TSA is still hunged up on. He thinks the president can personally do it without the check and balance.
The AG needs to sign off on it, but I'm sure the AG will go along with what his boss says, but that's not the point. The statute makes clear that it only applies to exclusively foreign communications

Post 2391 of this thread
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=266387&page=80&p=8944376&viewfull=1#post8944376

[TSA]

The AG needs to sign off on it, but I'm sure the AG will go along with what his boss says, but that's not the point. The statute makes clear that it only applies to exclusively foreign communications

Post 2391 of this thread
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=266387&page=80&p=8944376&viewfull=1#post8944376

You cleared it up fine last time. The President can order surveillance without a court order.

[spurraider21]

You cleared it up fine last time. The President can order surveillance without a court order.
But not in any manner that is relevant to trump. Which is why it's misleading to keep bringing it up here. Not to mention it's not a unilateral order and there is the formality of having the AG write a declaration

[TSA]

But not in any manner that is relevant to trump. Which is why it's misleading to keep bringing it up here. Not to mention it's not a unilateral order and there is the formality of having the AG write a declaration

I didn't bring it up, but thank you for clearing up that my statement is correct.

[Reck]

But..you're not.

[spurraider21]

I didn't bring it up, but thank you for clearing up that my statement is correct.It's correct if you operate under the assumption that the AG will always be a puppet for the president (to the extent that he'd perjure himself) and if you limit the scope of it to exclusively foreign communications

[Kim Jong-il]

You cleared it up fine last time. The President can order surveillance without a court order.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/54b955c4e4b0226a900bd97c/t/55112909e4b0519d68422cae/1427187978332/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fsa%3Di%26sourc e%3Dimages%26cd%3D%26ved%3D0CAUQjBw%26url%3Dhttp%2 53A%252F%252Fs2.quickmeme.com%252Fimg%252F57%252F5 7ed6d4d86aca63889ad9998acfa3f61d9591a10d6ce8ab6802 74704398a8abf.jpg%26ei%3DkygRVfLnOc_ZoATczoLoCQ%26 psig%3DAFQjCNHqSeujP4KPmGAv4tzwLm4O0U0D2Q%26ust%3D 1427274260049537

[TSA]

It's correct if you operate under the assumption that the AG will always be a puppet for the president (to the extent that he'd perjure himself) and if you limit the scope of it to exclusively foreign communications

My statement never said anything about Trump or the President by himself, so again, thank you for confirming my statement to be correct.

[spurraider21]

My statement never said anything about Trump or the President by himself, so again, thank you for confirming my statement to be correct.
Except you brought it up in the context of trumps wiretap claim

[TSA]

Except you brought it up in the context of trumps wiretap claim

In this most recent discussion brought up by djohn2oo8...no, I did not.

[AaronY]

WTF is with Stones head tho? Looks like Beetlejuice from Howard Stern lol

https://pbs-h2.twimg.com/media/C8GdR6eVAAEuRfE.jpg:small

[AaronY]

Sorry for interrupting the serious business of this thread..plz carry on..

[Reck]

WTF is with Stones head tho? Looks like Beetlejuice from Howard Stern lol

https://pbs-h2.twimg.com/media/C8GdR6eVAAEuRfE.jpg:small

Well hello there chap.

https://i.imgur.com/SeU1B0B.jpg

[djohn2oo8]

Well hello there chap.

https://i.imgur.com/SeU1B0B.jpg

847180063875481600

[djohn2oo8]

Well hello there chap.

https://i.imgur.com/SeU1B0B.jpg

847180063875481600

[TSA]

It's going to be hilarious if all of these investigations into Trump/Russia end up opening the huge can of worms that is the Clinton/Podesta/Uranium One/Russia connection.

[Reck]

It's going to be hilarious if all of these investigations into Trump/Russia end up opening the huge can of worms that is the Clinton/Podesta/Uranium One/Russia connection.

Retard alert.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/10/26/the-facts-behind-trumps-repeated-claim-about-hillary-clintons-role-in-the-russian-uranium-deal/?utm_term=.a18fb9339aa5

Let not your brain explode with the facts.

[TSA]

Since we are on the topic of Russia and money I thought I'd leave these here



From Russia with Money-GAI Report
http://www.g-a-i.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Report-Skolkvovo-08012016-2.pdf

Podesta fails to disclose receipt of 75,000 shares of stock from Kremlin financed company
http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/26/exclusive-john-podesta-may-have-violated-federal-law-by-not-disclosing-75000-stock-shares/?utm_campaign=atdailycaller&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=Social

Funny how the ones crying Russia seem to have all the actual ties to Russia

[djohn2oo8]

847223048336035840
Hmmm

[boutons_deux]

847223048336035840
Hmmm

the back then was WH and Dems wanted to go public, but bitch McConnell said no.

[TSA]

the back then was WH and Dems wanted to go public, but bitch McConnell said no.

Obama taking marching orders from McConnell :lmao

[Reck]

:lol If you buy that.

Obama was in legacy protection mode. Didn't want to come off as interfering in the elections.

[spurraider21]

:lol If you buy that.

Obama was in legacy protection mode. Didn't want to come off as interfering in the elections.bruh he was campaigning for hillary

[Reck]

bruh he was campaigning for hillary

Campaigning and starting a firestorm about muh Russia are two different things. Obama wasn't about to step in it as far as saying BUT Russia!

[spurraider21]

yeah, but its hard to say he was trying to stay out of the election as he was trying to convince the american people who to vote for

[boutons_deux]

Obama taking marching orders from McConnell :lmao

http://crooksandliars.com/2016/12/mitch-mcconnell-squelched-disclosure

[TSA]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2017/03/29/suspended-fox-news-expert-returns-and-doubles-down-on-baseless-wiretapping-claims/?utm_term=.9c4089339b23#comments

Judge Nap back on air defending his claim

[boutons_deux]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2017/03/29/suspended-fox-news-expert-returns-and-doubles-down-on-baseless-wiretapping-claims/?utm_term=.9c4089339b23#comments

Judge Nap back on air defending his claim

no evidence, G F Y

[Reck]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2017/03/29/suspended-fox-news-expert-returns-and-doubles-down-on-baseless-wiretapping-claims/?utm_term=.9c4089339b23#comments

Judge Nap back on air defending his claim

He suffers from the same stupid gene as you, it seems.

[TSA]

http://crooksandliars.com/2016/12/mitch-mcconnell-squelched-disclosure

no evidence, G F Y

[TSA]

If Fox doesn't permanently fire Judge Nap by tomorrow morning he's got something and has revealed it to Fox.
No way they take him off air and then let him back on knowing the first thing he brings up is what got him booted in the first place.

[boutons_deux]

Here's some b/g going back to the early 90s and rise of the Russian oligarchs and mafiya, shows why the FBI would have been snooping Trash Tower since so many Russians are in there, or have passed through there.

BEHIND-THE-SCENES INTERVIEW ON EXCLUSIVE TRUMP-RUSSIA-FBI STORY

http://whowhatwhy.org/2017/03/27/behind-scenes-interview-exclusive-trump-russia-fbi-story/

While Russia and its ex-satellites have been outsmarting, raping America for $Bs and compromising Trash and his ENTIRE ENTOURAGE.

[boutons_deux]

Trash’s Fool On The Hill: Nunes Makes Mockery Of Russia Investigation

Nunes explained:


“Details about U.S. persons associated with the incoming administration, details with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value, were widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting.”


The Washington Post noted that, “Nunes’s statements (https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/house-intelligence-chair-says-its-possible-trumps-communications-were-intercepted/2017/03/22/f45e18ba-0f2d-11e7-9b0d-d27c98455440_story.html?utm_term=.78aa6d203ea7) appear to center on surveillance approved by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, a secretive panel that authorizes the interception of communications of known or suspected agents of foreign powers—such as ambassadors—or terrorism suspects.”

In other words,

if Nunes wasn’t making up the whole story, he made an unauthorized disclosure of FISA-derived classified information in violation of the Espionage Act—exactly what he criticized others for doing.

Nunes implicated himself in a possible violation of the law,

destroyed the Republicans’ preferred line of defense, and

implicitly admitted that the administration has no rebuttal to Yates’ testimony.

As Colin Kahl, former national security adviser to Vice President Joe Biden, said on Twitter on Monday, “There are a lot of things we still don’t know about Trump-Russia ties. But there are actually a lot of things we DO know. (https://twitter.com/ColinKahl/status/846466154617077760)”

Kahl listed 36 points of fact, none of which Nunes seems prepared to respond to, much less rebut.

In the understatement of the week, thePost’s Aaron Blake said “Nunes isn’t very good (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/03/28/devin-nunes-is-just-not-very-good-at-this/?utm_term=.8d0a8f80100b) at this.”

http://www.nationalmemo.com/trumps-fool-nunes-mockery-russia/

https://twitter.com/ColinKahl/status/846466154617077760

[spurraider21]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gapRNpEjXUolove how they call the NYT article breaking news when it was reported on march 1 :lol

[djohn2oo8]

847398711328100352

[djohn2oo8]

o9IXAJg4Vm0

[djohn2oo8]

847264087029436417

[djohn2oo8]

847407780969406464

[djohn2oo8]

847408561621655552

[djohn2oo8]

847214676513558528

[pgardn]

847264087029436417


So the take home message from the article is:

"The Agency does… Who's running this thing from Moscow? The FBI just aren't capable on that side, of even understanding what Chris has."


not looking so good... The FBI can't handle it properly.

[DarrinS]

From January, but still relevant

By the way Smerconish is probably the best show on CNN. Too bad it's on Saturday morning


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Mj06bTEVhE

[Reck]

From January, but still relevant

By the way Smerconish is probably the best show on CNN. Too bad it's on Saturday morning


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Mj06bTEVhE

He's a pro russia shill. Shocking that he's semen shielding for all things Russia.

:lol Russian scholar

BTW how is this revelant in a possitive way now? If anything it proves him wrong as the Trump campaign had all kinds of Russian links.

[DarrinS]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gapRNpEjXUo

And this woman resigned in 2015. How does she know about this? Supposedly, she was advisor to Hillary campaign. Hmmm.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyYAjRVEk4g

[Reck]

Hmmm...tastes like bullshit.

In how many ways, shapes and forms do you trumpies need to read and hear intelligence agency bodies debunk this retarded claim?

[DarrinS]

And Louise Mensch is batshit crazy, so I wouldn't use her as a source, if I were you (ahem John)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpXsY00_5do

[rjv]

nice article that points out the elephant in the room: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_surveillance_state_behind_russia-gate_20170329

[TSA]

And Louise Mensch is batshit crazy, so I wouldn't use her as a source, if I were you (ahem John)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpXsY00_5do

The only people using her as a source are Eric Garland, John Schindler, and Kyle Griffin. One of them will make something up and the other three will retweet to the others, and then their followers do the same. Their twitter feeds are hilarious.

=========
:lol Mensch

The 45-year-old Mensch, a resident of Manhattan’s Upper West Side with her three children and rock band-manager husband, is a former record-company publicist and chick-lit novelist who is better known for spinning outlandish conspiracy theories than for her investigative-reporting chops.

Mensch, meanwhile, is definitely doing it herself, at a rate of dozens of tweets per day. In her lively, f-bomb-laced feed to her 178,000 followers—much of it attacks on Russia and Russians—she has variously asserted that Vladimir Putin had Breitbart News founder Andrew Breitbart “murdered,” apparently to create a leadership opening for the allegedly Putin-loving Stephen K. Bannon; that former Breitbart executive chairman Bannon, now the president’s chief strategist, is responsible for the bomb threats phoned in to Jewish community centers (“Bannon team are doing this obviously”); and that then-President Obama should have responded to Russian meddling in U.S. democracy last fall with “precision bombing raids. Bank hacks. Massive cyber war. Russia is a paper bear cub let @Potus show Putin what alpha means.”

Perhaps Mensch’s most elaborate conspiracy theory, fleshed out last month on her “Patribotics” blog, argues that serial sexter Anthony Weiner was cat-fished by “a hardened group of adult hackers” in North Carolina posing as a 15-year-old girl, prompting the criminal investigation that ultimately led FBI Director James Comey to inform congressional Republicans that a cache of Hillary Clinton’s emails had been discovered on Weiner’s laptop. The emails were planted there, Mensch surmised, by a Russian hacker who “alerted Russia’s moles and agents of influence in the FBI field office in New York, who subsequently ‘leaked’ to all and sundry that the emails had been found, and… pressured James Comey into sending the letter [to Congress]…”

And so on and so forth—all personally directed by Putin.

“Louise has become Carrie Mathison on a bad acid trip,” said Republican political consultant Evan Siegfried, referring to the emotionally fraught CIA operative on Showtime’s Homeland series. “Anybody who does not agree with her 100 percent is somehow working against her and in league with Russian interests.”

Siegfried had been friendly with Mensch, whom he occasionally ran into in television green rooms, but recently backed away after hostile Twitter encounters.

“In general, she’s being viewed in many circles as unbelievably toxic—not only to the people she’s trying to connect with, but to the ideas she’s promoting.”

Russia expert Tom Nichols, a professor of national security affairs at the U.S. Naval War College, publicly scolded Mensch last month for her claim that Putin had Andrew Breitbart whacked.

“This is crazy talk,” Nichols tweeted. “And undermines the important point that Russia has done real things for which it must be held accountable.”

Former Navy counterterrorism and intelligence officer Malcolm Nance, an on-air analyst for MSNBC and author of The Plot to Hack America: How Putin’s Cyberspies and WikiLeaks Tried to Steal the 2016 Election, is even blunter.

“She’s batshit crazy, OK?” Nance told The Daily Beast. “She is a fruit loop of the highest order.”

Mensch fired back: “I am unfazed by little people snapping at my heels.”

She said Siegfried is too marginal a figure to merit a response, while Nance, she claimed, didn’t even write his latest book. “I like Malcolm Nance’s book, but entire parts of it in reference to hacking—almost all of the book—were not written by him,” Mensch insisted, adding that one of Nance’s collaborators had done the heavy lifting. “He doesn’t know anything about hacking.”

Nance, the author of six books and a cryptologist by training, responded: “Do I have researchers? Yes, I do. Did [cyber researcher] Chris Sampson help me on my book? Yes, he did. But, you know, I actually have to write this stuff, and it actually has to be competent.”

Sampson told The Daily Beast that in a recent exchange of Twitter direct messages, Mensch suggested that he, Sampson, was the real author. “I said, ‘I didn’t write the book.’ …because it’s all Malcolm’s book,” Sampson said. “I would love to take credit for writing an amazing book that I haven’t finished reading myself.”

As for Nichols’s rebuke concerning Mensch’s claim about Putin and Breitbart, she argued that assertions made on Twitter needn’t be established facts.

“I said ‘I believe that’ and it was as a tweet. It wasn’t done as a reporter,” she said. “It’s not a piece of reporting, and I haven’t done any research into it. :lol

Yet she, too, has resorted to ad hominem attacks on people with whom she disagrees, notably accusing Naval Reserve intelligence officer and former FBI double agent Naveed Jamali of disseminating “what can only be described as pro-Kremlin propaganda,” she said. Mensch added that she was especially incensed by Jamali’s suggestion on Twitter that the Russians didn’t recruit top-secret leaker Edward Snowden and initially weren’t even sure that he was was on the level.

Mensch’s ally in verbal fisticuffs, defrocked Naval War College professor John Schindler, tweeted about their Twitter fight: “After his epic, Kremlin-sucking exchange w/@Louisemensch, there are only 2 choices left about Jamali: he” a complete fool or Kremlin tool.”

Schindler didn’t respond to an email seeking comment.

Jamali chronicled his experience of volunteering as a double agent, pretending to Russian intelligence operatives that he was an asset but instead hampering their mission by taking their money for disinformation, in his 2015 memoir, How to Catch a Russian Spy.

“I don’t know what has happened there—something negative, the way he keeps promoting the pro-Russian point of view,” Mensch said about Jamali, whose performance as a talking head she was publicly praising as recently as Feb. 9, when she tweeted: “Thanks Naveed…hope we do a show together one time! Love watching you.”

“As someone who has who has spent the last 12 years in service of his country,” Jamali messaged The Daily Beast, “I was deeply offended that Louise would question my loyalty to this country.”

Mensch, meanwhile, observed that Jamali and Schindler are frequent antagonists. “Ex-national security people can sometimes get into these little fights.”

Mensch’s Nov. 7 Heat Street report, vaguely attributed to “two separate sources with links to the counter-intelligence community,” claimed that the FBI was granted a secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant to examine emails and other communications between Trump, at least three of his associates, and two financial institutions with Russian connections, SVB Bank and the Alfa Bank.

Mensch’s reporting was the centerpiece of a Breitbart News essay published last Friday and inspired by right-wing radio jock Mark Levin’s rant the night before concerning the Washington establishment’s “police state” tactics and “silent coup” against the 45th president.

The Breitbart piece was widely circulated in the West Wing and drove Trump into a white-hot rage, prompting his infamous pre-dawn Saturday Twitter tantrum that drew heavily on Mensch’s article (without mentioning her name) and alleged that Obama had “wire-tapped” him “in Trump Tower before the victory.” Trump added that his predecessor is a “Bad (or sick) guy.” (Mensch’s story didn’t claim the FISA court had authorized “wiretaps”; that assertion erroneously appeared, however, in Breitbart’s summary of her piece.)

Mensch—who quietly relinquished the top editorship of Heat Street in December to pursue unspecified digital projects at the site’s parent company, News Corp.—has been celebrating her newfound relevance with an appearance on Fox News and stories acknowledging her pivotal role in The Washington Post, Yahoo News, Britain’s Telegraph and, last month before the president’s meltdown, in the Guardian, among other outlets.

But the problem, say intelligence community experts and journalists covering the ongoing Russian hacking and Russian/Trump saga, is that Mensch’s scoop may not be demonstrably accurate.

“Really, I’m just puzzled that even weeks after the fact, The Washington Post, The New York Times, and The Wall Street Journal, who have people on the beat, have not been able” to corroborate the existence of a FISA warrant as described by Mensch, said a Washington-based journalist who has been writing about Trump’s Russia connections and spoke on condition of not being named. “Why haven’t the major U.S. media outlets”—which collectively have dozens of presumably well-sourced reporters on the case—“been able to confirm this?”

A second prominent journalist who has been investigating the Trump/Russia connection also expressed skepticism about the validity of Mensch’s revelation.

“It’s exceedingly murky and there are ample grounds to be cautious about all of this,” said this journalist. “My sense is that there is a lot of smoke and probably something there, but it’s not exactly what we think it is, and there’s a lot of overwrought, overheated reporting going on that exceeds the known facts.”

Times legal and national security correspondent Charlie Savage noted this week that Heat Street “does not regularly publish investigative stories about American intelligence or law enforcement operations. To date, reporters for The New York Times with demonstrated sources in that world have been unable to corroborate that the court issued any such order.”

And The Washington Post’s resident fact-checker, Glenn Kessler, pronounced stories about the alleged survelliance “sketchy” and awarded Trump the dreaded “four Pinocchios” for maximum mendacity.

Mensch, however, points to the Guardian and the BBC as having independently confirmed her account of the FISA warrant.

Indeed, the BBC’s Paul Wood wrote: “On 15 October, the US secret intelligence court issued a warrant to investigate two Russian banks. This news was given to me by several sources and corroborated by someone I will identify only as a senior member of the US intelligence community. He would never volunteer anything… but he would confirm or deny what I had heard from other sources.”

Mensch also said a statement at Tuesday’s regular briefing by White House press secretary Sean Spicer, in which Spicer didn’t deny that the president has received hard information confirming such a warrant, also bolsters her case.

Naturally enough, Mensch declined to answer questions about her sourcing and, ever the conspiracy theorist, accused this reporter of participating in what she called “a mainstream media disinformation campaign” against her.

“There is a coordinated effort under way to somehow link the FISA warrant back to the CIA,” she said, explaining that another reporter she spoke with seemed to be trying to delegitimize her scoop by connecting it to former CIA agent Evan McMullin, whom Mensch supported for president.

“You’ve asked me an awful lot of questions, and I’ve got a good idea who’s behind this disinformation,” Mensch said mysteriously. “I find it fascinating.”

=======

:lol Schindler dick pics

PROVIDENCE, R.I. — A U.S. Naval War College professor has resigned following an investigation into a complaint that he took a racy photo that wound up online.

John Schindler voluntarily resigned his post as a professor of national security affairs, effective Aug. 29, a college spokeswoman said Monday. The former National Security Agency intelligence analyst has been on administrative leave since late June.

A May text message conversation with a photo of a penis and Schindler's name atop it was circulated in June on Twitter. It was unclear who sent it and who posted it.

A blogger sent a complaint to college administrators in Newport, and the college's president ordered an investigation.

Schindler has been critical of National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden and others and frequently engaged in heated exchanges with critics on Twitter. He did not immediately return telephone and email messages from The Associated Press on Monday. He previously refused to discuss the photo, citing legal reasons.

College spokeswoman Cmdr. Kelly Brannon declined to say what the investigators concluded. She said Schindler was told of the findings in late July and of possible outcomes. He had seven days to respond before an official decision was made, and he voluntarily submitted his resignation, she said.

Schindler had taught at the college since 2005. He posted a statement on his website in June addressing the controversy and apologizing for actions that he said "showed poor judgment and were inexcusable." He emphasized that he did not break the law, and said he also recognized he had been "rude and dismissive of other people's views" on Twitter.

Schindler took a brief break from social media but now posts again regularly. Lately he has been vocal about the conflict in Ukraine.

The war college is a one-year, resident program that graduates about 600 students a year, according to its website.

========

:lol Garland meltdown

Ok folks, just keep your hands away from Eric’s mouth.

Full disclosure, we didn’t include ALL of Eric’s tweets in this bizarre rant/meltdown because well … there were SO MANY. That and he gets super shouty and a little shall we say, unhinged?

Seems he’s upset with Fox News and Murdoch although it’s sorta hard to tell because he just goes off.

Check it out:

http://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2017/03/24/loud-noises-eric-garland-collectively-lost-his-shiznit-on-twitter-dont-make-eye-contact/

======

[spurraider21]

And Louise Mensch is batshit crazy, so I wouldn't use her as a source, if I were you (ahem John)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpXsY00_5do
I sat through that boring shit. Curious as to which part specifically made her batshit crazy. I assume you refer to the breitbart thing. Admittedly, that's retarded, but she's not reporting that as fact, and if anything that's credit to a journalist for not reporting something based on a hunch or belief, but instead only reporting what is objectively verified. Unless of course the claim is that she's making shit up and inventing sources, but that's a different conversation

I also don't really follow or keep up with her reporting, and never heard of her until this thread, but I don't think that interview on its face showed how she is an unreliable journalist

[TSA]

I sat through that boring shit. Curious as to which part specifically made her batshit crazy. I assume you refer to the breitbart thing. Admittedly, that's retarded, but she's not reporting that as fact, and if anything that's credit to a journalist for not reporting something based on a hunch or belief, but instead only reporting what is objectively verified. Unless of course the claim is that she's making shit up and inventing sources, but that's a different conversation

I also don't really follow or keep up with her reporting, and never heard of her until this thread, but I don't think that interview on its face showed how she is an unreliable journalist

But the problem, say intelligence community experts and journalists covering the ongoing Russian hacking and Russian/Trump saga, is that Mensch’s scoop may not be demonstrably accurate.

“Really, I’m just puzzled that even weeks after the fact, The Washington Post, The New York Times, and The Wall Street Journal, who have people on the beat, have not been able” to corroborate the existence of a FISA warrant as described by Mensch, said a Washington-based journalist who has been writing about Trump’s Russia connections and spoke on condition of not being named. “Why haven’t the major U.S. media outlets”—which collectively have dozens of presumably well-sourced reporters on the case—“been able to confirm this?”

A second prominent journalist who has been investigating the Trump/Russia connection also expressed skepticism about the validity of Mensch’s revelation.

“It’s exceedingly murky and there are ample grounds to be cautious about all of this,” said this journalist. “My sense is that there is a lot of smoke and probably something there, but it’s not exactly what we think it is, and there’s a lot of overwrought, overheated reporting going on that exceeds the known facts.”

Times legal and national security correspondent Charlie Savage noted this week that Heat Street “does not regularly publish investigative stories about American intelligence or law enforcement operations. To date, reporters for The New York Times with demonstrated sources in that world have been unable to corroborate that the court issued any such order.”



======

“In general, she’s being viewed in many circles as unbelievably toxic—not only to the people she’s trying to connect with, but to the ideas she’s promoting.”

Russia expert Tom Nichols, a professor of national security affairs at the U.S. Naval War College, publicly scolded Mensch last month for her claim that Putin had Andrew Breitbart whacked.

“This is crazy talk,” Nichols tweeted. “And undermines the important point that Russia has done real things for which it must be held accountable.”

Former Navy counterterrorism and intelligence officer Malcolm Nance, an on-air analyst for MSNBC and author of The Plot to Hack America: How Putin’s Cyberspies and WikiLeaks Tried to Steal the 2016 Election, is even blunter.

“She’s batshit crazy, OK?” Nance told The Daily Beast. “She is a fruit loop of the highest order.”

[djohn2oo8]

847499123817435137
Cues Crossroad Bone thugs

[djohn2oo8]

847502285273833472
Tell me whatttttttttchaaaaa gonna do when there ain't nowhere to hideeeee

[djohn2oo8]

847500272834232320

Crossroads, crossroads, crossroads...

[djohn2oo8]

847504083359608832
"Nowhere to runnnnnnnnnnnn"

[djohn2oo8]

847498462367109122

[djohn2oo8]

847505000125399040

[djohn2oo8]

847499030674493440

[djohn2oo8]

847504404261601280

[boutons_deux]

Paul Ryan says he's seen the documents that made Devin Nunes go wild—but he isn't sure Nunes has (http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/3/30/1648649/-Paul-Ryan-says-he-s-seen-the-documents-that-made-Devin-Nunes-go-wild-but-he-isn-t-sure-Nunes-has)

What did Nunes have to say about what had put him in such a lather (http://www.cbsnews.com/news/paul-ryan-on-house-intel-chairman-devin-nunes-trump-russia-gop-health-care/?linkId=36004653)?


“He had told me that — like, a whistleblower-type person had given him some information that was new that spoke to the last administration and part of this investigation,” Ryan said.

“He briefs me about it, didn’t know the content of it, only knew the nature of it and that he was going to brief others.”


So, like, according to Ryan, when Nunes came to him after his visit to his unnamed “source” at the White House,

Nunes “didn’t know the content”—which would indicate that he hadn’t seen the actual documents.

Which would be very much at odds with what Nunes himself has said. According to Ryan, Nunes knew only “the nature” of the information and that it was “part of this investigation,” but Nunes has said that he read the documents,

“Did you ask to see the documents yourself?” O’Donnell asked.
“He didn’t have the documents, so I didn’t,” Ryan responded.


“But he hasn’t. I mean, he hasn’t even informed the Republican committee,” O’Donnell said.

“Yeah, I have seen the actual documents. I don’t know that he’s been in possession of them yet.”


At this point, Ryan is saying that he has seen the documents, but isn’t sure that Nunes has seen them. And that’s far from the limit of the craziness. :lol

But … Ryan has seen the documents?

Ryan also says it wasn’t his idea for Nunes to inform Trump.

“If we don’t know if President Trump is under investigation, why would it then be appropriate for a member of an oversight committee to then go brief the president?” O’Donnell asked.

“Yeah, but I don’t believe that he is. So I don’t think that he is under investigation,” Ryan said. “No one has suggested that he is, and not even in a vague way. I don’t believe that he is.”

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2017/03/30/1648649/-Paul-Ryan-says-he-s-seen-the-documents-that-made-Devin-Nunes-go-wild-but-he-isn-t-sure-Nunes-has?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+dailykos%2Findex+%28Daily+Kos %29

[Reck]

"She's being viewed as toxic in many circles."

Cites a tweet and someone from the daily beast.

I'M CONVINCED, she's batshit crazy. :lol

[spurraider21]

But the problem, say intelligence community experts and journalists covering the ongoing Russian hacking and Russian/Trump saga, is that Mensch’s scoop may not be demonstrably accurate.

“Really, I’m just puzzled that even weeks after the fact, The Washington Post, The New York Times, and The Wall Street Journal, who have people on the beat, have not been able” to corroborate the existence of a FISA warrant as described by Mensch, said a Washington-based journalist who has been writing about Trump’s Russia connections and spoke on condition of not being named. “Why haven’t the major U.S. media outlets”—which collectively have dozens of presumably well-sourced reporters on the case—“been able to confirm this?”

A second prominent journalist who has been investigating the Trump/Russia connection also expressed skepticism about the validity of Mensch’s revelation.

“It’s exceedingly murky and there are ample grounds to be cautious about all of this,” said this journalist. “My sense is that there is a lot of smoke and probably something there, but it’s not exactly what we think it is, and there’s a lot of overwrought, overheated reporting going on that exceeds the known facts.”

Times legal and national security correspondent Charlie Savage noted this week that Heat Street “does not regularly publish investigative stories about American intelligence or law enforcement operations. To date, reporters for The New York Times with demonstrated sources in that world have been unable to corroborate that the court issued any such order.”



======

“In general, she’s being viewed in many circles as unbelievably toxic—not only to the people she’s trying to connect with, but to the ideas she’s promoting.”

Russia expert Tom Nichols, a professor of national security affairs at the U.S. Naval War College, publicly scolded Mensch last month for her claim that Putin had Andrew Breitbart whacked.

“This is crazy talk,” Nichols tweeted. “And undermines the important point that Russia has done real things for which it must be held accountable.”

Former Navy counterterrorism and intelligence officer Malcolm Nance, an on-air analyst for MSNBC and author of The Plot to Hack America: How Putin’s Cyberspies and WikiLeaks Tried to Steal the 2016 Election, is even blunter.

“She’s batshit crazy, OK?” Nance told The Daily Beast. “She is a fruit loop of the highest order.”
Yeah, a lack of corroboration is always problematic, but I don't think anybody suggests that she's the ultimate source of truth.

I haven't followed her long enough to really speak to her general credibility. Just sayin that video from darrin does little to demonstrate unreliability

[TSA]

Former Navy counterterrorism and intelligence officer Malcolm Nance, an on-air analyst for MSNBC

“She’s batshit crazy, OK?”

“She is a fruit loop of the highest order.”

[djohn2oo8]

847506027985608705

[djohn2oo8]

So TSA why did Nunes get his intel from the WH?

[djohn2oo8]

847499199914491904

[TSA]

djohn2oo8 is there a reason you post 10 tweets with the same NYT article?

[djohn2oo8]

djohn2oo8 is there a reason you post 10 tweets with the same NYT article?
:lmao because you had yet to respond. What's the reason Nunes got his sources from the WH?

[Reck]

Former Navy counterterrorism and intelligence officer Malcolm Nance, an on-air analyst for MSNBC

“She’s batshit crazy, OK?”

“She is a fruit loop of the highest order.”

And? That's one man's opinion.

But since you're sticking with his word of wisdom...live with this.


In 2016, Nance urged readers to be skeptical of Podesta emails (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podesta_emails) leaked by WikiLeaks (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks), writing that the documents were "riddled with obvious forgeries" and were black propaganda (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_propaganda) "not even professionally done" and arguing that even if all the emails were authentic, WikiLeaks' excerpts of the emails were posted to Twitter in a way that distorted their meaning.[8] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm_Nance#cite_note-8)[9] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm_Nance#cite_note-StarksGeller-9)

:lol

[TSA]

So TSA why did Nunes get his intel from the WH?

I honestly don't care from where or how Nunes got the intel. I just want to know if the previous administration was running surveillance on Trump and his team and spreading it throughout all agencies before Obama left.

I also want your updated list of who is "going down" along with the charges they'll be facing :lol

[djohn2oo8]

I honestly don't care from where or how Nunes got the intel. I just want to know if the previous administration was running surveillance on Trump and his team and spreading it throughout all agencies before Obama left.

I also want your updated list of who is "going down" along with the charges they'll be facing :lol

Nunes got his intel from the WH. Which you said the Intel wasn't even about Russia :lmao :lmao :lmao

[TSA]

Nunes got his intel from the WH. Which you said the Intel wasn't even about Russia :lmao :lmao :lmao I've told you numerous times to read the articles you are posting before commenting and looking foolish. The officials you are quoting that said Nunes got intel from inside the WH also said it was not about Russia. :lol stupid fuck


The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the intelligence and to avoid angering Mr. Cohen-Watnick and Mr. Ellis. Officials say Mr. Cohen-Watnick has been reviewing the reports from his fourth-floor office in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, where the National Security Council is based.

But the officials’ description of the intelligence is in line with Mr. Nunes’s own characterization of the material, which he has said was not related to the Russia investigations when he first disclosed its existence in a hastily arranged news conference on March 22.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/30/us/politics/devin-nunes-intelligence-reports.html?smprod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share

[rjv]

i do think the emphasis on the manner in which nunes obtained his information does skirt the more important issue of the out of control surveillance in this country and ironically enough, the repubs are suddenly unwittingly vindicating Snowden.

[Reck]

I wonder if Obama will just have to sue the shit out of Trump over the wiretapping claim to make him look even more stupid than he does now.

[djohn2oo8]

I've told you numerous times to read the articles you are posting before commenting and looking foolish. The officials you are quoting that said Nunes got intel from inside the WH also said it was not about Russia. :lol stupid fuck

The intel was about trump. To the Chairman of the committee investigation Trump you idiot :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

847514702813057026

[AaronY]

Huge break in the case: http://gizmodo.com/this-is-almost-certainly-james-comey-s-twitter-account-1793843641

[TSA]

Nunes got his intel from the WH. Which you said the Intel wasn't even about Russia :lmao :lmao :lmao


But the officials’ description of the intelligence is in line with Mr. Nunes’s own characterization of the material, which he has said was not related to the Russia investigations when he first disclosed its existence in a hastily arranged news conference on March 22.

[Reck]

Huge break in the case: http://gizmodo.com/this-is-almost-certainly-james-comey-s-twitter-account-1793843641

:wow Amazing.

Wild Cobra at work with help from his sidekick TSA.

[DarrinS]

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-03-30/white-house-says-intelligence-panels-can-see-surveillance-data

[TSA]

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-03-30/white-house-says-intelligence-panels-can-see-surveillance-data

go time

[DarrinS]

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/30/politics/white-house-letter-house-intelligence-committee/

[djohn2oo8]

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/30/politics/white-house-letter-house-intelligence-committee/

Right after Nunes was on WH grounds after hours viewing classified material from a WH staffer. :rollin

[TSA]

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/30/politics/white-house-letter-house-intelligence-committee/

uh oh

https://i.redd.it/7mntjwgwfcoy.png

[DarrinS]

Right after Nunes was on WH grounds after hours viewing classified material from a WH staffer. :rollin

<gasp!>

[djohn2oo8]

847577370009755648
Immunity for what Mike? :lol

[djohn2oo8]

847579591946489856

[DarrinS]

uh oh

https://i.redd.it/7mntjwgwfcoy.png


Start at about 2:30


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDBge7H3R-o

[TSA]

847577370009755648
Immunity for what Mike? :lol

We'll find out tomorrow he never asked for immunity and just offered to testify.

It is amusing though watching you now suddenly question immunity after 5 Clinton staffers were granted immunity.

[DarrinS]

The eyes! :lol

http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/IMG_2769-575x329.jpg

[pgardn]

And Louise Mensch is batshit crazy, so I wouldn't use her as a source, if I were you (ahem John)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpXsY00_5do


She believes something to be true because she wants Trump out.

She plays games. She mines for anything that will back up her assertions, because she wants Trump gone. That's not good enough. Do we have anything online from her that actually contradicts her beliefs? She might as well be Nunes as a politician. It's that bad.

[djohn2oo8]

847579035844661248

[TSA]

Start at about 2:30


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDBge7H3R-o

Watched it yesterday and found it strange she said that after hearing her credentials, I don't think she said it by accident. She could have been chosen to fall on the sword, she didn't say orders came from above.

[djohn2oo8]

847582538436681728


:lmao

[pgardn]

The eyes! :lol

http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/IMG_2769-575x329.jpg

Putin is as bad as Trump. He denied there were Russian soldiers in Crimea.

[djohn2oo8]

847577568555409408

[djohn2oo8]

847581919231586304
:lmao

[TSA]

847577568555409408

how many more random tweet tards can you find posting the same unverified WSJ article?

[TSA]

Keep the faith djohn. Keep the faith.

[djohn2oo8]

847585106072133632

[djohn2oo8]

847584201503277056
:lmao

[Reck]

847577370009755648
Immunity for what Mike? :lol

:lol asking congress for immunity like they're a law enforcement agency. :lol Oh Mike.

[djohn2oo8]

847586247153287168

[clambake]

��

[pgardn]

Keep the faith djohn. Keep the faith.

More dilligent in the pursuit of what one wants to be true compared to the poster quoted?
A possiblity.

[djohn2oo8]

847585055429898240

[djohn2oo8]

847585886711627777

[djohn2oo8]

847582808197533696
:lol

[djohn2oo8]

847588552011632640
:lmao

[Trill Clinton]

http://imgur.com/ttPMGbp.gif

[djohn2oo8]

http://imgur.com/ttPMGbp.gif

:lol

[Spurminator]

how many more random tweet tards can you find posting the same unverified WSJ article?

Back to not trusting unnamed officials?

[Reck]

Back to not trusting unnamed officials?

Not to mention the Wallstreet Journal is as pro Trump as Breitbart. :lol

But let's not trust them because its bad for god emperor Trump.

[pgardn]

Not to mention the Wallstreet Journal is as pro Trump as Breitbart. :lol



I don't think so. Not even close.

[djohn2oo8]

847594239307468804

[djohn2oo8]

847595155087609858
:lol

[Reck]

847594239307468804

Hang another L next to TSA. :lol

[DarrinS]

Hang another L next to TSA. :lol

For what?

[clambake]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiXNUaSjXRY

[spurraider21]

We'll find out tomorrow he never asked for immunity and just offered to testify.

It is amusing though watching you now suddenly question immunity after 5 Clinton staffers were granted immunity.
It is amusing though watching you now suddenly brush off immunity after creaming your pants for each of the 5 Clinton staffers that were granted immunity.

[spurraider21]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiXNUaSjXRY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-L1DzScQ4VU

[DarrinS]

847595155087609858
:lol

Just played on Anderson Cooper. Everyone drinking from the same fountain of talking points. Lol

[clambake]

http://youtu.be/UFBAjhxjQ90

[djohn2oo8]

847602964860502016
Not one...Not two. :lol

[Reck]

For what?


how many more random tweet tards can you find posting the same unverified WSJ article?

When the source is pretty much your lawyer, just log off for the night because you have no legs to stand on.

[djohn2oo8]

847600387548827648

[Reck]

847602964860502016
Not one...Not two. :lol

The incompetence is strong with Trump and the WH. :lol

[TSA]

We'll find out tomorrow he never asked for immunity and just offered to testify.
Didnt even have to wait for tomorrow :lol

[clambake]

http://youtu.be/UFBAjhxjQ90

i tells ya


this is some funny shit to watch.

[TSA]

Back to not trusting unnamed officials?

My track record is pretty damn good and just got better

[TSA]

It is amusing though watching you now suddenly brush off immunity after creaming your pants for each of the 5 Clinton staffers that were granted immunity.

It's amusing watching you attempt to equate rumored immunity asked for to actual immunity granted

[djohn2oo8]

My track record is pretty damn good and just got better
If your track record was so good you wouldn't have lost an account.

https://media.giphy.com/media/tZF2erGJ5uOHe/giphy.gif

[TSA]

Another classic circle jerk that left you all staring each other in the eyes with limp dicks in hand :rollin

[TSA]

If your track record was so good you wouldn't have lost an account.

https://media.giphy.com/media/tZF2erGJ5uOHe/giphy.gif

:lol that was pretty good.

Is our bet still on for Priebus being charged with obstruction of justice or are you going to run away from that for the 20th time?

https://media.giphy.com/media/tZF2erGJ5uOHe/giphy.gif

[clambake]

"what are you thinking about?"

tsa: limp dicks

[Reck]

TSA is such a faggy guy.

Defends the fact he didn't welsh by losing an account by posting under technically the same name and now he's claiming another bet he made under the said name he lost. What a massive faggot.

[DarrinS]

What is it you people think Flinn is going to say? His lawyer dangled the "he's got a story to tell" line as tantalizing tool for immunity. I'd want it too, given the current political climate.

[Reck]

What is it you people think Flinn is going to say? His lawyer dangled the "he's got a story to tell" line as tantalizing tool for immunity. I'd want it too, given the current political climate.

What, you actually think he'll be granted immunity without his info being vetted and checked first? :lol

[djohn2oo8]

What, you actually think he'll be granted immunity without his info being vetted and checked first? :lol

He could also just be subpoenaed lol

[TSA]

847577370009755648
Immunity for what Mike? :lolHow many L's you taken this week?

I'm going to predict your next fake news Twitter tard story.

James Comey was fired

[djohn2oo8]

How many L's you taken this week?

I'm going to predict your next fake news Twitter tard story.

James Comey was fired

Pretty sure every outlet is reporting this but ill snatch the life out of your second account too. Btw why does Flynn need immunity?

[djohn2oo8]

Where is it posted Comey was fired? Boy is TSA losing his damn mind.

[TSA]

Pretty sure every outlet is reporting this but ill snatch the life out of your second account too. Btw why does Flynn need immunity?



Jack Langer, spokesman for the House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said a deal for immunity has not been discussed. An aide to California Rep. Adam Schiff, the panel’s ranking Democrat, also said there had been no discussions about an immunity deal for Flynn.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/03/30/flynn-lawyer-client-wants-assurances-against-witch-hunt-prosecution/99850144/


I'll allow you to keep your account as I enjoy watching you take the daily L's :lol

[Spurminator]

My track record is pretty damn good and just got better

I think you're the only person who believes you have a "pretty damn good" track record with the sources you've chosen to trust.

[djohn2oo8]

Jack Langer, spokesman for the House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said a deal for immunity has not been discussed. An aide to California Rep. Adam Schiff, the panel’s ranking Democrat, also said there had been no discussions about an immunity deal for Flynn.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/03/30/flynn-lawyer-client-wants-assurances-against-witch-hunt-prosecution/99850144/


I'll allow you to keep your account as I enjoy watching you take the daily L's :lol

Quoting the rep for the asshole colluding with the White house :lmao

[Spurminator]

Quoting the rep for the asshole colluding with the White house :lmao

This is not a winning argument for you.

[TSA]

Start at about 2:30


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDBge7H3R-o

Oh shit I thought it was the first interview. She's fucked.

New story:

"“We were having a transition of power from the Obama administration to the Trump administration. If indeed there was an investigation ongoing, if indeed there was information the Obama administration had about Russian interference and possible American involvement, I wanted to make sure Congress knew about it,” she said on “Squawk Box.”

I was out of the government at the time all this came out into the press and I only knew what I read in the press, but KNOWING-uh HEARING that our intelligence community was looking into this, investigating into what had happened. Understanding the relationship between Wikileaks and the Russian government I could kinda read between the lines and I became very concerned even without having any inside information.”

[TSA]

Quoting the rep for the asshole colluding with the White house :lmao

It's quotes like this that made me want to keep you around.

:lol Schiff's aide

[TSA]

I think you're the only person who believes you have a "pretty damn good" track record with the sources you've chosen to trust.

I've got a tried and true method.

Wait for djohn2oo8 to go on a tweet dump, claim the opposite.

[Reck]

She's fucked.....for talking about something the Obama admin did on purpose so the trump admin wouldn't bury the story.

Seriously, I give TSA some props for stumbling through life being this fucking stupid.

[baseline bum]

Quoting the rep for the asshole colluding with the White house :lmao

Schiff?

[BanditHiro]

lol barely day 70 and someone is already asking for immunity

[djohn2oo8]

Schiff?

Nunes.

[djohn2oo8]

It's quotes like this that made me want to keep you around.

:lol Schiff's aide

847624076650717184
Fox news calling you a dumbass

[TSA]

Nunes.

Looking forward to your L's tomorrow. I had the USA Today article in hand when you offered up another ELE but that would have been too easy. Glad you're still around :tu

[djohn2oo8]

Looking forward to your L's tomorrow. I had the USA Today article in hand when you offered up another ELE but that would have been too easy. Glad you're still around :tu

When you understand how a FISA warrant works maybe you will learn to stop losing.

[TSA]

847624076650717184
Fox news calling you a dumbass

Fox news quoting WSJ

Another L to end the night :rollin

[TSA]

When you understand how a FISA warrant works maybe you will learn to stop losing.

you stop losing first and I'll think about it :lol

[djohn2oo8]

you stop losing first and I'll think about it :lol

Admitting you don't know how it works.

[BanditHiro]

is TSA's favorite meal borscht?

[pgardn]

My track record is pretty damn good and just got better

Uh oh.

Rating himself now.
Im gonna have to ask for an independent investigation.

[pgardn]

Just played on Anderson Cooper. Everyone drinking from the same fountain of talking points. Lol

Does it really matter?
Im glad I got fed this by you.

Flynn is a liar AND a hypocrite.
Its pretty damned obvious.

And it's possible this all leads to absolutely nothing, but these bumblers still lie and contort. It's just bizzare. Just because Putin's leadership illicited an erection response in Donald. Unbelievable... Why these idiots are creating a giant mess for themselves when nothing of any consequence actually occurred. This is possibly a more important point. Are they really this incompetent? The Democrats just assume they are actually guilty criminals, but in actuality, they might merely just be idiots.

[djohn2oo8]

847622544521740288

[djohn2oo8]

847635937995612160

[lefty]

:popcorn

[TSA]

847622544521740288

Read before you tweet

"Saipan, an island of 50,000 residents closer to China than to Hawaii, relaxed rules on casinos in 2014 and soon awarded Imperial Pacific exclusive rights to open casinos there. The casino, run by an executive who cut his teeth in Atlantic City casinos then owned by Donald Trump, enlisted a slate of luminary overseers including former leaders of both the Republican and Democratic national parties in the U.S.

Its board members include James Woolsey, who ran the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency in the early 1990s and was among national-security advisers to Trump’s presidential campaign. Former FBI director Louis Freeh and Ed Rendell, a former Pennsylvania governor and Democratic National Committee chairman, sit on an advisory committee, as does Haley Barbour, the ex-Mississippi governor and Republican National Committee chairman who’s now a prominent lobbyist."

[djohn2oo8]

847776529585246209

[djohn2oo8]

847629662603706369
lol

[djohn2oo8]

847778297492668416

[djohn2oo8]

847784734818279424

:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

847779406223486977

Sounds like someone needs immunity

[djohn2oo8]

847774786231160832

[pgardn]

Djohn holding his own "independent" investigation on ST.
But leaking like sieve.

This might bypass pizza guy. My take: The sauces of gossip are not completely rancid. Just knowing the lostmysanity sauces were coming from 4chan neck-beards turned my stomach. But the insane gossip had a fleshy flavor with the child organs added. Nothing quite that potent here. But dammit we got dueling conspiracy gossip so all is well.

[pgardn]

847774786231160832

Oh oh hell Yes!

New recipes from new sauces for searchinforsanity.

[Reck]

Djohn holding his own "independent" investigation on ST.
But leaking like sieve.

This might bypass pizza guy. My take: The sauces of gossip are not completely rancid. Just knowing the lostmysanity sauces were coming from 4chan neck-beards turned my stomach. But the insane gossip had a fleshy flavor with the child organs added. Nothing quite that potent here. But dammit we got dueling conspiracy gossip so all is well.

Wait..what's conspiratorial about what djohn posts?

You can argue most of it is conjecture but the tweets are grounded in reality and based loosely on facts. After all, the media and all the networks, save for Fox has been covering the Flynn story for months.

[DarrinS]

Wait..what's conspiratorial about what djohn posts?

You can argue most of it is conjecture but the tweets are grounded in reality and based loosely on facts. After all, the media and all the networks, save for Fox has been covering the Flynn story for months.


:lol

[DarrinS]

By the way, Fox reports on this too, but they devote their entire evening broadcast to it, like CNN and MSNBC. :lol

[Reck]

By the way, Fox reports on this too, but they devote their entire evening broadcast to it, like CNN and MSNBC. :lol

Shepard Smith is the only credible guy on Fox. His show is the only show resembling an actual news hour.

[boutons_deux]

Ex-intel official: There’s only one person Mike Flynn could give up to get immunity — Donald Trump

former top intelligence official said investigators would only offer the disgraced national security adviser a deal if he could deliver evidence against someone higher up the chain.

There’s only one person who fits that description — and that’s President Donald Trump, said Jeremy Bash, the former chief of staff for both the CIA and Department of Defense and former counsel to the House Intelligence Committee.

“For the Justice Department to agree to give somebody like him immunity, it means they want him to turn and testify against someone higher up in the food chain,” Bash told MSNBC (http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/ex-cia-chief-staff-jeremy-bash-says-white-house-runaway-n740926).

“Who is higher up in the food chain, higher than the national security adviser?

There’s really only one person, and so this shows that the jeopardy of criminal liability actually extends all the way to the top.”

Federal investigators have so far have not accepted Flynn’s offer to exchange his testimony for immunity from criminal prosecution, which Bash said raised new questions.

“Immunity from what?” Bash wondered. “What is he in jeopardy of being prosecuted for?”

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/03/ex-intel-official-theres-only-one-person-mike-flynn-could-give-up-to-get-immunity-donald-trump/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

[DarrinS]

Shepard Smith is the only credible guy on Fox. His show is the only show resembling an actual news hour.

Shep is a bit of a drama queen, but his set is pretty hilarious. I love that giant iPad they have on set. During the recent London attack, he was using it to show photos from the Sky News website and the page contained clickbait ads that were almost pornographic. :lol

What about Bret Baier? Chris Wallace?

[Reck]

Shep is a bit of a drama queen, but his set is pretty hilarious. I love that giant iPad they have on set. During the recent London attack, he was using it to show photos from the Sky News website and the page contained clickbait ads that were almost pornographic. :lol

What about Bret Baier? Chris Wallace?

Yeah, I though about Bret Baier right after making my post.

[baseline bum]

I can't imagine Flynn is offering shit for the case if the FBI hasn't jumped.

[baseline bum]

Yeah, I though about Bret Baier right after making my post.

Chris Wallace is awesome


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oPif5a7JOQ

[Reck]

I can't imagine Flynn is offering shit for the case if the FBI hasn't jumped.

The senate said no thanks, dude. :lol

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/31/senate-intelligence-committee-turned-down-flynns-request-for-immunity-nbc.html

The FBI probably already knows enough about Flynn to not offer him shit. Flynn is on his own.

[TSA]

:lol still pushing the immunity request that never happened

[baseline bum]

The senate said no thanks, dude. :lol

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/31/senate-intelligence-committee-turned-down-flynns-request-for-immunity-nbc.html

The FBI probably already knows enough about Flynn to not offer him shit. Flynn is on his own.

Then he either has nothing on Trump or is pretending he has nothing on Trump. djohn2oo8's dream of Comey leading Dear Leader in bracelets down the steps of the Capitol on a perp walk getting less and less. :cry

[djohn2oo8]

847852369681543168
Reck , TSA holding another L

[djohn2oo8]

847854762024464386

[djohn2oo8]

Then he either has nothing on Trump or is pretending he has nothing on Trump. djohn2oo8's dream of Comey leading Dear Leader in bracelets down the steps of the Capitol on a perp walk getting less and less. :cry

OR the Senate has all the dirt on Flynn and Trump that they don't need to grant him immunity. Trump will not finish his term. Btw, you think the FBI is the only one with the goods on Trump? :lol

[djohn2oo8]

Btw, I never said Comey would arrest Trump. Trump could resign. Thats what will be offered to him. Impeachment or resign.

[TSA]

847852369681543168
Reck , TSA holding another L

You still running with this statement from Flynn's lawyer?

"No reasonable person, who has the benefit of advice from counsel, would submit to questioning in such a highly politicized, witch-hunt environment without assurances against unfair prosecution,'' Flynn's attorney Robert Kelner said in a written statement.

[Reck]

Btw, I never said Comey would arrest Trump. Trump could resign. Thats what will be offered to him. Impeachment or resign.

Pence would pardon Trump if he ever gets criminally charge though. Ala Ford with Nixon.

Personally dont give a shit what happens to Trump as long as he gets removed.

[Reck]

You still running with this statement from Flynn's lawyer?

"No reasonable person, who has the benefit of advice from counsel, would submit to questioning in such a highly politicized, witch-hunt environment without assurances against unfair prosecution,'' Flynn's attorney Robert Kelner said in a written statement.

People a million times smarter than you already spoke on the matter. Kill yourself.

[baseline bum]

OR the Senate has all the dirt on Flynn and Trump that they don't need to grant him immunity.

That's some real wishful thinking. You always offer Gravano immunity when he makes your case against Gotti air-tight.

[djohn2oo8]

847823385036042241

[TSA]

OR the Senate has all the dirt on Flynn and Trump that they don't need to grant him immunity. Trump will not finish his term. Btw, you think the FBI is the only one with the goods on Trump? :lol

OR there isn't any dirt on Trump and this is just a long drawn out tantrum from the left in an attempt to smear Trump, which it's looking like more and more each day as not a single piece of evidence has come out to support your theory.

[djohn2oo8]

That's some real wishful thinking. You always offer Gravano immunity when he makes your case against Gotti air-tight.

If it's true that Trump was caught on tape talking to the Russians, thats pretty air tight.

[Reck]

TSA:
http://i.imgur.com/BdToviB.gif

[djohn2oo8]

OR there isn't any dirt on Trump and this is just a long drawn out tantrum from the left in an attempt to smear Trump, which it's looking like more and more each day as not a single piece of evidence has come out to support your theory.

How does a FISA warrant work

[TSA]

Tweedle dum still quoting me hoping for a response after being told I won't converse with a dumb and dishonest poster :lol

[TSA]

How does a FISA warrant work

You've had since July of 2016 to produce a single shred of evidence Trump colluded with the Russians and you've come up with nothing.

[TSA]

There has been confirmed Russian shitposting though :rollin

[djohn2oo8]

You've had since July of 2016 to produce a single shred of evidence Trump colluded with the Russians and you've come up with nothing.

Youve had many months to understand that a President cannot order a wiretap and you've learned nothing.

[baseline bum]

OR there isn't any dirt on Trump and this is just a long drawn out tantrum from the left in an attempt to smear Trump, which it's looking like more and more each day as not a single piece of evidence has come out to support your theory.

So it's the DNC's Benghazi?

[TSA]

Youve had many months to understand that a President cannot order a wiretap and you've learned nothing.

You learned a President can indeed order surveillance without a court order under 5 0 U.S. Code § 1802

It's about time you moved past this though and focus on why since July of 2016 you still don't have a shred of evidence Trump colluded with the Russians.

[TSA]

So it's the DNC's Benghazi?

Looks to be, minus a dead US ambassador.

[baseline bum]

Looks to be, minus a dead US ambassador.

Even if there's nothing there the DNC might as well keep investigating in an attempt to undermine Dear Leader's presidency just like the GOP with Lewinsky (:lol impeachment over a blowjob) or Benghazi.

[clambake]

spicer wants you to look at hillary instead.

[Reck]

spicer wants you to look at hillary instead.

Guy's a fool. Nigga said her and Putin had personal phone calls like they were besties.

:lol Not realizing Putin hates her guts.

[TSA]

Even if there's nothing there the DNC might as well keep investigating in an attempt to undermine Dear Leader's presidency just like the GOP with Lewinsky (:lol impeachment over a blowjob) or Benghazi.

Undermining didn't work for the GOP and they just lost credibility, it will be the same for the DNC, probably worse.

[DarrinS]

http://therightscoop.com/watch-new-blockbuster-report-appears-to-vindicate-devin-nunes-amid-scandalous-media-coverage/

[baseline bum]

Undermining didn't work for the GOP and they just lost credibility, it will be the same for the DNC, probably worse.

The GOP's investigations going nowhere worked out beautifully for them. Bush got elected on restoring integrity to the white house after Clinton's blowjob and the GOP trashed his wife's name enough that grifter Trump got elected. With Trump's connections to Russia and his asking the Russians to hack Clinton's emails the DNC could pretty effectively call Dear Leader's allegiances into question for years. And they should, the GOP has shown it to be a winning strategy.

[CosmicCowboy]

I am offering $100 bets that Trump will neither be convicted of anything or resign.

It a great opportunity for you guys like Reck and djohn making these claims to make some easy money if you actually believe the shit you post.

Line up and put your money down bitches.

[Kim Jong-il]

I am offering $100 bets that Trump will neither be convicted of anything or resign.

It a great opportunity for you guys like Reck and djohn making these claims to make some easy money if you actually believe the shit you post.

Line up and put your money down bitches.
$10,000 bets or shut the fuck up

[TSA]

The GOP's investigations going nowhere worked out beautifully for them. Bush got elected on restoring integrity to the white house after Clinton's blowjob and the GOP trashed his wife's name enough that grifter Trump got elected. With Trump's connections to Russia and his asking the Russians to hack Clinton's emails the DNC could pretty effectively call Dear Leader's allegiances into question for years. And they should, the GOP has shown it to be a winning strategy.
I was focusing more on Benghazi.

They can keep claiming Russian collusion for years but the facts will be out long before then. Top Dems are already starting to back away from the Russian collusion

[TSA]

http://therightscoop.com/watch-new-blockbuster-report-appears-to-vindicate-devin-nunes-amid-scandalous-media-coverage/

Adam Schiff is at the WH now. Will be very interesting to hear what he was shown.

[TSA]

http://therightscoop.com/watch-new-blockbuster-report-appears-to-vindicate-devin-nunes-amid-scandalous-media-coverage/

1. The surveillance that led to the unmasking started way BEFORE Trump was the GOP nominee

2. The person who did the unmasking is very high up in the intelligence world and is not in the FBI

3. The people reported by the NY Times were not Nunes sources. They only helped him navigate the intelligence

4. Nunes was told about the unmasking of Trump’s team back in January BEFORE Trump’s tweet about Obama’s spying.

5. It took a while to coordinate Nunes seeing the intelligence reports in order to protect his source. They chose the White House because it was the only other location they could view the reporting without outing the source.

6. None of this has anything to do with Russia.

[baseline bum]

I was focusing more on Benghazi.

They can keep claiming Russian collusion for years but the facts will be out long before then. Top Dems are already starting to back away from the Russian collusion

It was wildly effective despite nothing ever coming out of the Benghazi investigations. There is always going to be that suspicion of collusion since the Russians hacked Clinton's emails, and the DNC should use that to its advantage.

[TSA]

It was wildly effective despite nothing ever coming out of the Benghazi investigations. There is always going to be that suspicion of collusion since the Russians hacked Clinton's emails, and the DNC should use that to its advantage.

:lol CrowdStrike methods/report just got shit on yet again.

No one has been able to attribute to Russia, no one.

ETA: but you have a point since most people like yourself have just accepted "Russia hacked the election"

[baseline bum]

:lol CrowdStrike methods/report just got shit on yet again.

No one has been able to attribute to Russia, no one.

So the FBI just took the DNC's word for it? Why don't they just take the DNC's word for it that Trump is guilty of treason too if that's the case?

[TSA]

So the FBI just took the DNC's word for it? Why don't they just take the DNC's word for it that Trump is guilty of treason too if that's the case?
"In its statement, the FBI agreed with the DNC’s implication that it had instead relied on data from Crowdstrike. But the Bureau points the finger for its lack of independent evaluation squarely at the DNC. According to the FBI official, “This left the FBI no choice but to rely upon a third party for information. These actions caused significant delays and inhibited the FBI from addressing the intrusion earlier.”
https://www.wired.com/2017/01/fbi-says-democratic-party-wouldnt-let-agents-see-hacked-email-servers/

If you're interested read up on how flawed the Crowdstrike report was and how they've now made two revisions since their initial findings.

[Reck]

Isn't it a little wierd---suspect that TSA is never wrong but everyone else is according to him?

Guy suffers from mental illness.

[TSA]

So the FBI just took the DNC's word for it? Why don't they just take the DNC's word for it that Trump is guilty of treason too if that's the case?

I can't find anything even saying the CIA was allowed access to the server to run their own forensics. NSA obviously got in there and they came out with the least amount of confidence it was Russia in the ODNI

Which brings up the question of why was the DNC not allowing access to their server for forensics to be run?

[DMC]

Isn't it a little wierd---suspect that TSA is never wrong but everyone else is according to him?

Guy suffers from mental illness.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C8RZFw4XsAE5YUA.jpg

[pgardn]

OR there isn't any dirt on Trump and this is just a long drawn out tantrum from the left in an attempt to smear Trump, which it's looking like more and more each day as not a single piece of evidence has come out to support your theory.

Tantrum... This is possibly what got Trump to continue to have to deal with this.
When you use the word Tantrum, I see Trump. He is a spoiled child.

Hillary could not have possibly motivated the left like Trump has managed.

[pgardn]

$10,000 bets or shut the fuck up

Thats only 100, 100$ bills.
You wont need a machine to gum that up.

[djohn2oo8]

I am offering $100 bets that Trump will neither be convicted of anything or resign.

It a great opportunity for you guys like Reck and djohn making these claims to make some easy money if you actually believe the shit you post.

Line up and put your money down bitches.

Bet. and make it your account too.

[Leetonidas]

Investigation finds nothing on Hilary: “lock her up! She's a criminal”
Investigation yet to find anything on Trump: “there's no evidence! Told you so!”

Do you trump fellators not see how fucking hypocritical you are? :lmao that bitch hillary got what she deserved but LMAO you motherfuckers have your heads so far up trumps ass it's a wonder you are able to still type on your keyboards tbh

[djohn2oo8]

Investigation finds nothing on Hilary: “lock her up! She's a criminal”
Investigation yet to find anything on Trump: “there's no evidence! Told you so!”

Do you trump fellators not see how fucking hypocritical you are? :lmao that bitch hillary got what she deserved but LMAO you motherfuckers have your heads so far up trumps ass it's a wonder you are able to still type on your keyboards tbh

They are scared.

[boutons_deux]

Trump Flees The Room And Runs From Reporters After Being Asked About Mike Flynn

A White House Executive Order signing event abruptly ended without Trump signing the executive orders after the president fled the room because a reporter asked him about Mike Flynn.

http://www.politicususa.com/2017/03/31/trump-flees-room-runs-reporters-asked-mike-flynn.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29

Bully Trash is actually a chickenshit

[TSA]

Investigation finds nothing on Hilary: “lock her up! She's a criminal”
Investigation yet to find anything on Trump: “there's no evidence! Told you so!”

Do you trump fellators not see how fucking hypocritical you are? :lmao that bitch hillary got what she deserved but LMAO you motherfuckers have your heads so far up trumps ass it's a wonder you are able to still type on your keyboards tbh
:lol nothing on Hillary

The investigation began as a referral from the Intelligence Community Inspector General in connection with Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail server during her time as Secretary of State. The referral focused on whether classified information was transmitted on that personal system.

Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities.

Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).

None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.

Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.

While not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of unclassified e-mail systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information found elsewhere in the government.

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

[TSA]

They are scared.

Slow day in the twitterverse?

[Joseph Kony]

Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.


if this was the language being used in the Trump investigations trumptards would clearly be saying :cry see! no real evidence! told you so! :cry

[DarrinS]

They are scared.

Petrified, tbh. :lol

[DarrinS]

I wonder if conversations in the International Space Station are awkward right now?

[DarrinS]

Slow day in the twitterverse?

If people need their fix of breathless Russiagate reporting, tune into CNN.

[tlongII]

Bet. and make it your account too.

Witness!

[TSA]

:lol no clear evidence
:lol lists off clear evidence


:lol nothing on Hillary

The investigation began as a referral from the Intelligence Community Inspector General in connection with Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail server during her time as Secretary of State. The referral focused on whether classified information was transmitted on that personal system.

Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities.

Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).

None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.

Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.

While not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of unclassified e-mail systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information found elsewhere in the government.

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

[djohn2oo8]

847967824291221506

Like i said

[CosmicCowboy]

Bet. and make it your account too.

Fine as long as you disappear forever when you lose the bet. No coming back as faggot account 2.

[djohn2oo8]

Fine as long as you disappear forever when you lose the bet. No coming back as faggot account 2.

Like TSA did

[djohn2oo8]

847936144499146753

[baseline bum]

847936144499146753

Why is this BREAKING? Isn't this what this entire thread is about?