View Full Version : Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
Chris
03-26-2018, 04:54 PM
obama playing 7D chess, now trumpers are begging for his report
Obama busy scamming money off the top of his tranny library :lol
I hope they throw the book at him.
Pavlov
03-26-2018, 05:00 PM
Obama busy scamming money off the top of his tranny library :lol
I hope they throw the book at him.Prove it.
Chris
03-26-2018, 05:11 PM
Prove it.
lmemulatedao!
Pavlov
03-26-2018, 05:14 PM
lmemulatedao!This is your white flag.
Blake
03-26-2018, 05:15 PM
lmemulatedao!
Are you seriously saying you came up with "prove it"?
boutons_deux
03-26-2018, 08:32 PM
Trump world worries that Manafort's partner will sing about much more than Manafort to Mueller (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/3/26/1752297/-Trump-world-worries-that-Manafort-s-partner-will-sing-about-much-more-than-just-Manafort-to-Mueller)
Gates is apparently getting plenty of mentions in the West Wing as Donald Trump and his associates fret over how much damage he can do to Team Trump as a cooperating witness in the Russia probe. Politico's Darren Samuelsohn writes (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/03/26/rick-gates-mueller-trump-484739):
“He saw everything,” said a Republican consultant who worked with Gates during the campaign.
The consultant called Gates one of the “top five” insiders whom Mueller could have tapped as a cooperative government witness. One defense attorney in the case said Gates’ plea has triggered palpable alarm in Trump world.
Manafort may have struck a larger public profile, but Gates spent more time in Trump’s orbit.
Manafort left the Trump campaign under a cloud of scandal in mid-August 2016.
Gates, his right-hand man, stayed on through the election before assisting the Trump inauguration and Trump’s early presidency.
Worst of all for the White House, Gates lacks hard-wired loyalty.
He is not family, like Trump’s oldest son, Donald Trump Jr., or his son-in-law, Jared Kushner.
Nor is he among true Trump believers like Corey Lewandowski and Brad Parscale.
Oh, Gates has loyalty alright—to minimizing his sentence and watching his kids grow up.
Gates poses two serious problems for Team Trump in relation to Manafort:
1) he might have enough dirt on his former partner to give Mueller the leverage needed to flip Manafort;
2) Gates outlasted the campaign and transitioned to the White House, where he witnessed things firsthand that Manafort did not.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/3/26/1752297/-Trump-world-worries-that-Manafort-s-partner-will-sing-about-much-more-than-just-Manafort-to-Mueller (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/3/26/1752297/-Trump-world-worries-that-Manafort-s-partner-will-sing-about-much-more-than-just-Manafort-to-Mueller)
Chris
03-26-2018, 08:33 PM
Ruh roh!!!
978426906839265280
Pavlov
03-26-2018, 08:49 PM
Ruh roh!!!
978426906839265280What does this have to do with the current Mueller investigation, Chris?
Chris
03-26-2018, 08:56 PM
What does this have to do with the current Mueller investigation, Chris?
More evidence of their corruption and lack of credibility.
Ruh roh!!!
978426906839265280
:wow Game over. Gotta get TSA on the case.
djohn2oo8
03-26-2018, 10:59 PM
More evidence of their corruption and lack of credibility.
This coming from a fellow who cannot differentiate between council and counsel.
Chris
03-26-2018, 11:22 PM
This coming from a fellow who cannot differentiate between council and counsel.
Absolutely zero correlation and ridiculously trite. Your lack of recognition has been duly noted.
djohn2oo8
03-26-2018, 11:55 PM
Absolutely zero correlation and ridiculously trite. Your lack of recognition has been duly noted.
Your brain has absolutely zero correlation to any current event.
Pavlov
03-27-2018, 12:40 AM
More evidence of their corruption and lack of credibility.
Absolutely zero correlation and ridiculously trite. Your lack of recognition has been duly noted.
Duly indeed.
I don't know why you're so afraid of Mueller, but you are definitely afraid of Mueller.
Chris
03-27-2018, 12:42 AM
Duly indeed.
I don't know why you're so afraid of Mueller, but you are definitely afraid of Mueller.
I think Mueller is afraid those redactions to the texts are going to come back and bite him.
Pavlov
03-27-2018, 12:43 AM
I think Mueller is afraid those redactions to the texts are going to come back and bite him.Nope.
Why are you so afraid of Mueller?
Chris
03-27-2018, 12:54 AM
Nope.
Why are you so afraid of Mueller?
Mueller fucked up. You're terrified of Horowitz and Sessions.
Pavlov
03-27-2018, 12:59 AM
Mueller fucked up. You're terrified of Horowitz and Sessions.You didn't answer the question.
Why are you afraid of Mueller?
I have no reason to be afraid of either Horowitz or Sessions.
Chris
03-27-2018, 01:03 AM
You didn't answer the question.
Why are you afraid of Mueller?
I have no reason to be afraid of either Horowitz or Sessions.
Never said I was afraid of Mueller. He's a paper tiger. Can't wait until you disown him so I can cite this post.
Pavlov
03-27-2018, 01:20 AM
Never said I was afraid of Mueller. He's a paper tiger. Can't wait until you disown him so I can cite this post.You want him and his team to be fired.
Why? What do you think they will do if not fired?
Chris
03-27-2018, 01:26 AM
You want him and his team to be fired.
Why? What do you think they will do if not fired?
I hope they throw the book at him much less fire him. Obstruction of justice, treason: I want the gallows. You're terrified of Horowitz and Sessions.
Already citing the "team" so you can disown Mueller and praise the Democrat prosecutors later on. Yep!
Pavlov
03-27-2018, 01:33 AM
I hope they throw the book at him much less fire him. Obstruction of justice, treason: I want the gallows.For what charges, specifically? You need to show specifically how Mueller obstructed justice and committed treason.
You're terrified of Horowitz and Sessions.Nope. I'm quite happy they are doing their jobs in this investigation.
Already citing the "team" so you can disown Mueller and praise the Democrat prosecutors later on. Yep!The "team" is Mueller and the people Mueller hired. I include them all because you are terrified of them all. I am happy they are doing their jobs in this investigation.
Pavlov
03-27-2018, 01:58 AM
lol even the White House is investigating Kushner
978440228200439808
RandomGuy
03-27-2018, 08:57 AM
lol even the White House is investigating Kushner
978440228200439808
But these people are Republicans? How can they possibly have conflicts of interest? I thought the rule was it was ok, if they were Republican.
RandomGuy
03-27-2018, 09:25 AM
Trump Gives 60 Russians a Week to Get Out of the US
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-gives-60-russians-week-040000835.html
This, TSA, would just about put my theory about Trump being compromised to rest. The sale of lethal arms to Ukraine was a decent first step, but not ordered directly.
Trumps refusal to bring up the Russian nerve agent attack in the UK during a call, or publicly criticizing Putin doesn't quite help to deliver the final knockout blow.
I hope they throw the book at him much less fire him. Obstruction of justice, treason: I want the gallows. You're terrified of Horowitz and Sessions.
Already citing the "team" so you can disown Mueller and praise the Democrat prosecutors later on. Yep!
You live in crazy land.
:lol Obstruction of justice.
:lol Treason
boutons_deux
03-27-2018, 11:57 AM
kicking out spies cost Pootin nothing
What he really wants is the financial/personal sanctions lifted.
If US, UK, etc really wanted to hurt Pootin, they'd ratchet up the financial sanctions.
boutons_deux
03-27-2018, 12:51 PM
Is Trump About to Make a Fatal Mistake in the Mueller Probe?
A wave of departures have left the president more vulnerable than ever before.
the president is in big trouble if he decides to conduct an interview with special counsel Robert Mueller.
attorney Jay Sekulow is the only lawyer working as Trump’s personal attorney on the special counsel’s investigation,
ex-federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti wrote on Monday that
the president is treading on increasingly dangerous ground without properly experienced legal counsel to help him prepare for an interview with Mueller and his team.
“Sekulow has no experience handling federal criminal investigations,” he writes.
“Asking him to quarterback the defense to this important investigation would be like asking a neurologist to be your heart surgeon.”
Sekulow also explained that attorney
Ty Cobb, who is working on behalf of the White House on the Mueller probe, can’t help Trump prepare for a Mueller interview
because “conversations between Trump and Ty Cobb (and other lawyers employed by the White House) can be obtained by Mueller in discovery under existing case law.”
Mariotti said that these latest developments make it more likely that Trump will make a critical mistake in handling the Russia probe.
“This increases the possibility that Trump will mismanage how he responds to the investigation,” he said.
“Perhaps he will sit for an interview that most experienced criminal defense attorneys would work hard to avoid.”
https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/trump-about-make-fatal-mistake-mueller-probe (https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/trump-about-make-fatal-mistake-mueller-probe)
Chris
03-27-2018, 02:47 PM
978715781549576192
Pavlov
03-27-2018, 02:53 PM
978715781549576192I don't see where the DOJ compares Comey to Wikileaks at all. Maybe you can post the DOJ quote where they say that.
djohn2oo8
03-27-2018, 02:54 PM
I don't see where the DOJ compares Comey to Wikileaks at all. Maybe you can post the DOJ quote where they say that.
:lmao Chris
Chris
03-27-2018, 03:35 PM
I don't see where the DOJ compares Comey to Wikileaks at all. Maybe you can post the DOJ quote where they say that.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Plf-JWs-Cross-Motion-PA-and-Statement-of-Facts-Combined.pdf
page 17
Pavlov
03-27-2018, 03:37 PM
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Plf-JWs-Cross-Motion-PA-and-Statement-of-Facts-Combined.pdf
page 17I don't see where the DOJ compares Comey to Wikileaks at all. Maybe you can post the DOJ quote where they say that. That was not a DOJ quote.
Chris
03-27-2018, 03:47 PM
I don't see where the DOJ compares Comey to Wikileaks at all. Maybe you can post the DOJ quote where they say that. That was not a DOJ quote.
Here, Mr. Comey’s testimony or transmittal of the material to others, both of which
occurred when he was acting as a private citizen, in no way constitutes “official disclosure” of
the contents of the memos. See Transcript, at 7 (Comey answering “[n]o” to question of whether
“the special counsel’s office review[ed] and/or edit[ed] [his] written testimony”). This case is
thus similar to the cases involving, e.g., memoirs by former government officials and the
Wikileaks documents, in which waiver was not found. See Afshar, 702 F.2d at 1133 (concluding
that none of the books by former CIA agents and officials is “an official and documented
disclosure, as the release of CIA cables would be”); ACLU v. Dep’t of State, 878 F. Supp. 2d
215, 224 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (“No matter how extensive, the WikiLeaks disclosure is no substitute
for an official acknowledgement and the [plaintiff] has not shown that the Executive has
officially acknowledged that the specific information at issue was a part of the WikiLeaks
disclosure.”); see also Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. v. Dep’t of the Navy, 891 F.2d 414,
421 (2d Cir. 1989) (“Admiral Carroll’s statements cannot effect an official disclosure of
information since he is no longer an active naval officer.”)
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Defs-MSJ.pdf
page 27
Pavlov
03-27-2018, 03:53 PM
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Defs-MSJ.pdf
page 27I'm no lawyer, so I'll have to ask you how the DOJ is saying Comey and Wikileaks are the same here. From what I can see, it's an pretty narrow comparison of the actual documents, not a person and whatever Wikileaks calls itself today.
Chris
03-27-2018, 03:59 PM
I'm no lawyer, so I'll have to ask you how the DOJ is saying Comey and Wikileaks are the same here. From what I can see, it's an pretty narrow comparison of the actual documents, not a person and whatever Wikileaks calls itself today.
https://archive-media-0.nyafuu.org/vp/image/1470/42/1470429084989.gif
Pavlov
03-27-2018, 04:02 PM
https://archive-media-0.nyafuu.org/vp/image/1470/42/1470429084989.gifYes, it appears Judicial Watch did move the goalposts here. Disingenuous, to say the least.
I'm no lawyer, so I'll have to ask you how the DOJ is saying Comey and Wikileaks are the same here. From what I can see, it's an pretty narrow comparison of the actual documents, not a person and whatever Wikileaks calls itself today.
This is how the judicial watch hacks read it. Has nothing to do with DOJ opining on the matter.
There are no actual quotes from the DOJ. :lol Chris
Pavlov
03-27-2018, 04:09 PM
This is how the judicial watch hacks read it. Has nothing to do with DOJ opining on the matter.
There are no actual quotes from the DOJ. :lol Chris:lol It's HEADLINE NEWS
djohn2oo8
03-27-2018, 04:17 PM
https://media.giphy.com/media/3otPoHtlHgovmNJSDe/200w.webp
(Marv Albert): Chris goes up high and down hard!!
RandomGuy
03-27-2018, 04:45 PM
978715781549576192
:rollin judicialwatch.org
Chris
03-27-2018, 06:40 PM
:rollin judicialwatch.org
You're terrified of Tom Fitton :lol
Trump Gives 60 Russians a Week to Get Out of the US
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-gives-60-russians-week-040000835.html
This, TSA, would just about put my theory about Trump being compromised to rest. The sale of lethal arms to Ukraine was a decent first step, but not ordered directly.
Trumps refusal to bring up the Russian nerve agent attack in the UK during a call, or publicly criticizing Putin doesn't quite help to deliver the final knockout blow.
https://www.politico.com/amp/story/2018/03/27/trump-call-putin-russia-expulsions-487786?__twitter_impression=true
djohn2oo8
03-27-2018, 10:08 PM
978820420739706880
djohn2oo8
03-27-2018, 10:08 PM
978823498662588416
Lawdy!
djohn2oo8
03-27-2018, 10:11 PM
978796031289839616
djohn2oo8
03-27-2018, 10:30 PM
Just so we are clear. Team Trump was working with Russian Intelligence.
djohn2oo8
03-27-2018, 10:36 PM
978830502290485248
:lmao
baseline bum
03-28-2018, 06:53 AM
978830502290485248
:lmao
Son and Cuckner too
boutons_deux
03-28-2018, 07:11 AM
:rollin judicialwatch.org
ditto, JW is a integral part of the VRWC
boutons_deux
03-28-2018, 08:08 AM
NRA admits moving money from accounts with foreign donations to US campaign accounts
The National Rifle Association acknowledged this week that it has moved money from accounts with foreign donation to accounts that are used for spending on U.S. political campaigns. The organization insists the transactions are “permitted by law.”
“we do receive some contributions from foreign individuals and entities,” but it also insisted that “those contributions are made directly to the NRA for lawful purposes.”
“the movement of its money between accounts could make it difficult, if not impossible, to track how the money is spent since it is not isolated or sequestered.”
it acknowledged that some of the money in accounts containing foreign donations is moved into accounts used to fund political campaigns in the U.S. But the NRA insisted that the “transfers between accounts are made as permitted by law.”
“The NRA did not immediately respond to a request from NPR to disclose the total sum of its donations from foreign sources,”
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/03/nra-admits-moving-money-accounts-foreign-donations-us-campaign-accounts/
So Pootin has compromised hyper-patriot NRA? :lol
Why would foreigners give money to NRA?
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 09:05 AM
NRA admits moving money from accounts with foreign donations to US campaign accounts
The National Rifle Association acknowledged this week that it has moved money from accounts with foreign donation to accounts that are used for spending on U.S. political campaigns. The organization insists the transactions are “permitted by law.”
“we do receive some contributions from foreign individuals and entities,” but it also insisted that “those contributions are made directly to the NRA for lawful purposes.”
“the movement of its money between accounts could make it difficult, if not impossible, to track how the money is spent since it is not isolated or sequestered.”
it acknowledged that some of the money in accounts containing foreign donations is moved into accounts used to fund political campaigns in the U.S. But the NRA insisted that the “transfers between accounts are made as permitted by law.”
“The NRA did not immediately respond to a request from NPR to disclose the total sum of its donations from foreign sources,”
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/03/nra-admits-moving-money-accounts-foreign-donations-us-campaign-accounts/
So Pootin has compromised hyper-patriot NRA? :lol
Why would foreigners give money to NRA?
Yes they have. NRA will not exist in its current form.
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 09:24 AM
978977774194085888
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 09:59 AM
979008854104166400
978830502290485248
:lmao
Only a dipshit like you would post multiple links to van der Zwann's sentencing memorandum and fail to actually read them.
NONE of this has to do with Trump's campaign. ALL of this has to do with Gates/Manafort/Podesta/Skadden Arps work in Ukraine for Tymoshenko in 2012 :rollin
The recorded calls van der Zwann handed over to Mueller were discussions with Gates and Person A about possible criminal charges in Ukraine for their work on the Tymoshenko report.
978796031289839616
What were they discussing on the call djohn? :rollin
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 10:27 AM
Only a dipshit like you would post multiple links to van der Zwann's sentencing memorandum and fail to actually read them.
NONE of this has to do with Trump's campaign. ALL of this has to do with Gates/Manafort/Podesta/Skadden Arps work in Ukraine for Tymoshenko in 2012 :rollin
The recorded calls van der Zwann handed over to Mueller were discussions with Gates and Person A about possible criminal charges in Ukraine for their work on the Tymoshenko report.
Two members of Trump campaign knowingly associating with Russian intelligence. Sorry dumbass. You cannot spin that. BTW, Gates communicating with Russian intelligence while on the campaign. Oh and Manafort discussing giving private briefings to the Kremlin.
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 10:28 AM
Oh, let's not forget Jr.'s meeting with the Kremlin lawyer to discuss quid pro quo. Or Kushner trying to set up secret comms with the Kremlin to avoid detection by the US government. Fuck off.
Pavlov
03-28-2018, 10:29 AM
Oh, let's not forget Jr.'s meeting with the Kremlin lawyer to discuss quid pro quo. Or Kushner trying to set up secret comms with the Kremlin.Look, adoptions of Russian babies are very important to the Trump family.
Just so we are clear. Team Trump was working with Russian Intelligence.
zUyqDxa2k3w
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 10:34 AM
zUyqDxa2k3w
Reduced to posting youtube videos because there is no way in hell you can spin Gates in contact with a Russian spy during the election after the entire campaign was warned by the FBI to report any contact with Russians. Oh and why did Trump say his team had not been in contact with any Russians when that was a lie?
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 10:34 AM
Look, adoptions of Russian babies are very important to the Trump family.
:lmao
Two members of Trump campaign knowingly associating with Russian intelligence. Sorry dumbass. You cannot spin that. BTW, Gates communicating with Russian intelligence while on the campaign. Oh and Manafort discussing giving private briefings to the Kremlin.
What were the recorded calls van der Zwann handed over discussing djohn?
Reduced to posting youtube videos because there is no way in hell you can spin Gates in contact with a Russian spy during the election after the entire campaign was warned by the FBI to report any contact with Russians. Oh and why did Trump say his team had not been in contact with any Russians when that was a lie?
You think Trump knew Manafort and Gates were still trying to cover up crimes they committed in 2012? :lol
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 10:46 AM
What were the recorded calls van der Zwann handed over discussing djohn?
Sorry guy. Again. No way you can spin why Trump campaign members, had been in contact with Russian Intelligence. About the recorded calls, the filing states the recordings show proof that Van der Swann had lied to the FBI.
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 10:48 AM
You think Trump knew Manafort and Gates were still trying to cover up crimes they committed in 2012? :lol
Gates was communicating with Russian intel in 2016 while on the campaign. Trump's deputy campaign chair. Jr met with Russian intel himself. As did Manafort. And Kushner discussed setting up secret communications with Russians. And your excuse is that Trump was ignorant? :lmao
Here is the sentencing memorandum djohn failed to read if anyone is interested
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4424937-Sentencing-Memorandum.html
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 10:52 AM
Oh and let's not forget that Sessions lied under oath about his Russian contacts, and is on intercepts.
Sorry guy. Again. No way you can spin why Trump campaign members, had been in contact with Russian Intelligence. About the recorded calls, the filing states the recordings show proof that Van der Swann had lied to the FBI.
They were in contact with person A discussing possible criminal charges they could face in Ukraine for their work in 2012. What does that have to do with Trump?
Sorry to blue balls you this early in the morning djohn :rollin
Oh and let's not forget that Sessions lied under oath about his Russian contacts, and is on intercepts.Oh and let's not forget...
"The Special Counsel's office has informed me that after interviewing the attorney general and conducting additional investigation, the attorney general is not under investigation for false statements or perjury in his confirmation hearing testimony and related written submissions to Congress," attorney Chuck Cooper told ABC News on Wednesday.
zUyqDxa2k3w
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 10:57 AM
They were in contact with person A discussing possible criminal charges they could face in Ukraine for their work in 2012. What does that have to do with Trump?
They had no business being in contact with Russian intelligence of any kind. They were warned to contact the FBI. They did not. You are okay with BOTH Manafort and Gates being in contact with a Russian spy DURING the campaign?
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 10:59 AM
The candidates were urged to alert the FBI about any suspicious overtures to their campaigns, the officials said.
They had no business being in contact with Russian intelligence of any kind. They were warned to contact the FBI. They did not. You are okay with BOTH Manafort and Gates being in contact with a Russian spy DURING the campaign?
They were in contact with person A discussing possible criminal charges they could face in Ukraine for their work in 2012. What does that have to do with Trump?
978796031289839616
What were the recorded calls van der Zwann handed over discussing djohn?
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 11:08 AM
They were in contact with person A discussing possible criminal charges they could face in Ukraine for their work in 2012. What does that have to do with Trump?
The Trump campaign was warned by the FBI of Russian intel looking to infiltrate the Trump campaign. Both Manafort and Gates (While on the campaign and he stayed on through the end) were communicating with Russian intel after being warned. They did not contact the FBI. Why?
The Trump campaign was warned by the FBI of Russian intel looking to infiltrate the Trump campaign. Both Manafort and Gates (While on the campaign and he stayed on through the end) were communicating with Russian intel after being warned. They did not contact the FBI. Why?
What were Manafort and Gates discussing with person A?
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 11:12 AM
What were Manafort and Gates discussing with person A?
They were not to have any contact without notifying the FBI. Why didn't they?
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 11:17 AM
979027043722649600
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 11:18 AM
979028133381922816
They were not to have any contact without notifying the FBI. Why didn't they?
Answer the question dodgerjohn. What were Manafort and Gates discussing with person A?
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 11:19 AM
Answer the question dodgerjohn. What were Manafort and Gates discussing with person A?
Why did they not notify the FBI that they were in communication with Russian Intelligence?
Why did they not notify the FBI that they were in communication with Russian Intelligence?
Answer the question dodgerjohn. What were Manafort and Gates discussing with person A?
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 11:20 AM
979028133381922816
Lordy!
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 11:21 AM
Answer the question dodgerjohn. What were Manafort and Gates discussing with person A?
Why were private US citizens in contact with Russian Intelligence?
Lordy!
:rollin quoting yourself minutes later.
Why were private US citizens in contact with Russian Intelligence?
Since you are too much of a pussy to answer my question I'll go ahead and answer yours and mine.
Gates and Manafort were in contact with person A to discuss possible criminal charges stemming from their work in Ukraine in 2012. What does their work in Ukraine in 2012 have to do with Trump?
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 11:24 AM
Why were private US citizens in contact with Russian Intelligence?
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 11:24 AM
Since you are too much of a pussy to answer my question I'll go ahead and answer yours and mine.
Gates and Manafort were in contact with person A to discuss possible criminal charges stemming from their work in Ukraine in 2012. What does their work in Ukraine in 2012 have to do with Trump?
Any communication, was warned by the FBI would needed to be reported. They did not. Why didn't they?
Any communication, was warned by the FBI would needed to be reported. They did not. Why didn't they?
People who commit crimes generally don't go tell the FBI they are discussing crimes with co-conspirators. What do the crimes they committed in Ukraine in 2012 have to do with Trump?
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 11:29 AM
People who commit crimes generally don't go tell the FBI they are discussing crimes with co-conspirators. What do the crimes they committed in Ukraine in 2012 have to do with Trump?
The entire Trump campaign was warned. No one reported it. In simpler terms, the Trump campaign had ongoing contact with a Russian Military Intelligence officer. The campaign manager and the deputy campaign manager.
Let's not forget JR did not report his meeting to the FBI.
Sessions did not report his contacts to the FBI.
Kushner did not report his backchannel attempts to the FBI.
Lordy!
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 11:30 AM
In other words, for the dimwitted, Trump lied when he said no one in his campaign had any contacts to Russian intel.
dodgerjohn with the white flag
Next time you think you've got a bombshell try reading beyond the tweet :lol
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 11:33 AM
Oh, let's not forget Stone communicating with Guccifer 2.0 :lol
let's not forget Cambridge Analytica asking Assange for Hillary's emails :lol
Papadufus spilling the beans about Russians having Hillary's emails :lol
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 11:43 AM
lol I guess white flag logged off.
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 11:47 AM
979030147792818177 CROFL
boutons_deux
03-28-2018, 11:53 AM
My guess is that Trash knew Manafort / Gates were working for Pootin in Ukraine as the reason he hired them
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 11:54 AM
My guess is that Trash knew Manafort / Gates were working for Pootin in Ukraine as the reason he hired them
Yes. Manafort and Trump have known each other since the 80's.
lol I guess white flag logged off.Do you want me to keep laughing at your "bombshell" you didn't read? :lol
It had nothing to do with Trump and everything to do with Gates/Manafort/Podesta/Skadden Arps work in Ukraine for Tymoshenko in 2012.
My guess is that Trash knew Manafort / Gates were working for Pootin in Ukraine as the reason he hired them
What's your guess on Hillary hiring Podesta?
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 11:59 AM
Do you want me to keep laughing at your "bombshell" you didn't read? :lol
It had nothing to do with Trump and everything to do with Gates/Manafort/Podesta/Skadden Arps work in Ukraine for Tymoshenko in 2012.
Trump campaign was warned. They did not comply.
Pavlov
03-28-2018, 12:05 PM
What's your guess on Hillary hiring Podesta?Probably his work for the Democrats on the federal level dating back to 1979.
Just a guess though.
What's your guess, TSA?
spurraider21
03-28-2018, 12:14 PM
Probably his work for the Democrats on the federal level dating back to 1979.
Just a guess though.
What's your guess, TSA?
spirit cooking
boutons_deux
03-28-2018, 12:16 PM
What's your guess on Hillary hiring Podesta?
They both eat foetus parts on large pizzas, tastes like veal
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 12:19 PM
They both eat foetus parts on large pizzas, tastes like veal
:lmao
Pavlov
03-28-2018, 12:21 PM
They both eat foetus parts on large pizzas, tastes like vealThat was funnier than any Borowitz article you have ever posted tbh.
boutons_deux
03-28-2018, 12:22 PM
What's your guess on Hillary hiring Podesta?
They both eat foetus parts on large pizzas, tastes like veal
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 12:29 PM
979045466603126784
lmao Dowd finna sing that ass off.
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 12:30 PM
979047344728666112
because this is what innocent people worry about :lmao
979047344728666112
because this is what innocent people worry about :lmao
djohn again not reading past the tweet :lol
Mr. Dowd, who was hired last year to defend the president during the Mueller inquiry, took the lead in dealing directly with Mr. Flynn’s and Mr. Manafort’s lawyers, according to two people familiar with how the legal team operated.
He denied on Wednesday that he discussed pardons with lawyers for the president’s former advisers.
“There were no discussions. Period,” Mr. Dowd said. “As far as I know, no discussions.”
Contacted repeatedly over several weeks, the president’s lawyers representing him in the special counsel’s investigation maintained that they knew of no discussions of possible pardons.
“Never during the course of my representation of the president have I had any discussions of pardons of any individual involved in this inquiry,” Jay Sekulow, a lawyer for Mr. Trump, said on Wednesday.
Ty Cobb, the White House lawyer dealing with the investigation, added, “I have only been asked about pardons by the press and have routinely responded on the record that no pardons are under discussion or under consideration at the White
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/28/us/politics/trump-pardon-michael-flynn-paul-manafort-john-dowd.html
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 12:37 PM
979049236548521985
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 12:37 PM
979049236548521985
979049381209964544
:lmao :lmao :lmao
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 12:41 PM
979050506663415813
:lmao
spurraider21
03-28-2018, 12:44 PM
djohn again not reading past the tweet :lol
Mr. Dowd, who was hired last year to defend the president during the Mueller inquiry, took the lead in dealing directly with Mr. Flynn’s and Mr. Manafort’s lawyers, according to two people familiar with how the legal team operated.
He denied on Wednesday that he discussed pardons with lawyers for the president’s former advisers.
“There were no discussions. Period,” Mr. Dowd said. “As far as I know, no discussions.”
Contacted repeatedly over several weeks, the president’s lawyers representing him in the special counsel’s investigation maintained that they knew of no discussions of possible pardons.
“Never during the course of my representation of the president have I had any discussions of pardons of any individual involved in this inquiry,” Jay Sekulow, a lawyer for Mr. Trump, said on Wednesday.
Ty Cobb, the White House lawyer dealing with the investigation, added, “I have only been asked about pardons by the press and have routinely responded on the record that no pardons are under discussion or under consideration at the White
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/28/us/politics/trump-pardon-michael-flynn-paul-manafort-john-dowd.html
wow. he denies it.
https://i.imgflip.com/17iek1.jpg
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 12:46 PM
wow. he denies it.
https://i.imgflip.com/17iek1.jpg
:lmao
Pavlov
03-28-2018, 12:47 PM
You got it all wrong. They were discussing whether Trump could adopt Flynn and Manafort.
djohn2oo8
03-28-2018, 12:49 PM
You got it all wrong. They were discussing whether Trump could adopt Flynn and Manafort.
https://media.giphy.com/media/3ohhwm8EX5AhfVN7XO/giphy.webp
Blake
03-28-2018, 01:09 PM
Since you are too much of a pussy to answer my question
That's so rich
John Dowd singing like a bird...for free.
:lol TSA and Chrissy.
boutons_deux
03-28-2018, 11:03 PM
Who Ratted Out John Dowd? I Think We Know
So who ratted out John Dowd and his offers or hints of offers of pardons to Trump’s top aides who found themselves in Robert Mueller’s crosshairs? I think we can make a pretty solid educated guess.
February 23rd, Rick Gates cut his deal with Bob Mueller (https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/gates-mueller-plea-deal-entered).
It seems quite likely that Manafort either discussed these offers with Gates (after all, they were originally fighting this as a team) or the offer was made to Gates as well. Perhaps, in fact quite likely, Manafort would have relayed the offer.
After all, the value of Manafort staying quiet would be heavily undercut if Gates talked. He’d need to get the offer too.
So Gates makes his deal, shares this information with Bob Mueller and then Mueller’s investigators go to Flynn to try to get confirmation. Flynn’s cooperating. So he needs to answer.
Pretty quickly Mueller et al. can confirm that these offers (hints of offers at least) weremade. The Times seems to get wind of it around the same time.
Remember that these offers would have had to have been made many months ago, before Flynn’s deal (12/1/2017) and before the charges against Manafort (10/30/2017).
I think we can be pretty confident that we know one of Mueller’s first big gets from Gates’ cooperation.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/who-ratted-out-john-dowd-i-think-we-know
boutons_deux
03-28-2018, 11:46 PM
It’s not just elections: Russia hacked the US electric grid
And it may be just the first phase of a bigger attack.
On March 15, the US government released a report describing
a massive Russian hacking campaign (https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/alerts/TA18-074A) to infiltrate America’s “critical infrastructure” —
things like power plants, nuclear generators, and water facilities.
The joint report from the FBI and Department of Homeland Security claims that Russian hackers gained access to computers across the targeted industriesand collected sensitive data including passwords, logins, and information about energy generation.
While the report doesn’t specify any identifiable sabotage, the intrusion itself could set up future attacks that do more than just record
observations.
Energy Secretary Rick Perry told lawmakers (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-15/russian-hackers-attacking-u-s-power-grid-aviation-fbi-warns) at an appropriations hearing that cyberattacks are “literally happening hundreds of thousands of times a day,” and warned that
the Department of Energy needs an “office of cybersecurity and emergency response” in order to be prepared for threats like this in the future.
:lol sure, Jimmy Ricky's gonna spend money on cybersecurity :lol
a big deal:
It’s the first time the US government has publicly blamed Russia’s government for attacks on energy infrastructure.
Explicitly pinning the attack on the Kremlin means that rather than targeting the hackers as individuals,
the United States can now respond against Russia as a whole.
https://www.vox.com/world/2018/3/28/17170612/russia-hacking-us-power-grid-nuclear-plants
And Trash is enraged and is on the case defending America as he is sworn to do :lol
boutons_deux
03-29-2018, 01:29 PM
Mueller makes two points: Manafort had active ties to Russia and don't mess with the special counsel (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/3/28/1752709/-Mueller-makes-two-points-Manafort-had-active-ties-to-Russia-and-don-t-mess-with-the-Special-Counsel)
A business associate of Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort had a direct connection to Russian intelligence—and that includes during the 2016 campaign. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/manafort-associate-had-russian-intelligence-ties-during-2016-campaign-prosecutors-say/2018/03/28/473228e8-3231-11e8-8bdd-cdb33a5eef83_story.html?utm_term=.972e632a0bdc)
The associate, named in court documents as “Person A,” is described as a former GRU (the main military foreign-intelligence service of the Russian Federation) officer—a description that fits Kilimnik.
According to the court documents, “Person A” was in communication with Manafort and Gates during the 2016 campaign and had continued contact with Manafort’s former associates in Ukraine.
The second item revealed is no surprise:
Robert Mueller is seriously invested in the idea that lying to the special counsel’s office should generate more than a slap on the wrist.
there’s a difference between his indictment last month on charges of lying to investigators and
similar charges against Rick Gates, Michael Flynn and George Papadopoulos—
van der Zwaan is not a cooperating witness.
He’s just … indicted.
Robert Mueller's office argued that a judge shouldn't rule out jail time for Alex van der Zwaan, a lawyer who pleaded guilty to lying to prosecutors and the FBI in the Russia investigation.
Van der Zwaan’s indictment may not have come with an agreement to testify, but it did come as part of a plea deal that allowed van der Zwaan to avoid additional charges based on multiple instances of lying to investigators and withholding documents pertinent to the investigation.
"The defendant was expressly warned by the government that it is a crime to lie to the Special Counsel’s Office,
that lying could constitute a federal crime, and
that such conduct would carry with it the possibility of going to jail if he were convicted.
van der Zwaan stated that he understood.
He thereafter deliberately and repeatedly lied,"
He was warned, but he persisted … in lying to the special counsel’s office.
still a lot of people who haven’t taken their turn in Mueller’s chair, and
they should all know that not telling the truth there carries serious consequences.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/3/28/1752709/-Mueller-makes-two-points-Manafort-had-active-ties-to-Russia-and-don-t-mess-with-the-Special-Counsel?detail=emaildkre
Pavlov
03-29-2018, 01:34 PM
Van der Zwaan’s is the weirdest case of career suicide I've seen since Tillerson's "fucking moron" comment.
Rick Wilson was right: everything Trump touches dies.
Chris
03-29-2018, 01:46 PM
g_Z1zOUHU98
Pavlov
03-29-2018, 01:47 PM
g_Z1zOUHU98Let me guess.
Routine Brady order that was given over a month ago?
spurraider21
03-29-2018, 01:58 PM
yeah. dick morris is way behind tbh :lol
RandomGuy
03-29-2018, 02:24 PM
The associate, named in court documents as “Person A,” is described as a former GRU ... was in communication with Manafort and Gates during the 2016 campaign and had continued contact with Manafort’s former associates in Ukraine.
Looks like... collusion.
Spurminator
03-29-2018, 02:25 PM
Is there any doubt that Dick Morris hosts a drag queen karaoke gig on the side?
RandomGuy
03-29-2018, 02:25 PM
TSA.
Get your goalpost moving gloves on.
djohn2oo8
03-29-2018, 02:38 PM
979437216400371717
Reck
djohn2oo8
03-29-2018, 02:42 PM
979442156006866944
hmm sounds familiar
djohn2oo8
03-29-2018, 02:44 PM
979424504064741377
boutons_deux
03-29-2018, 02:51 PM
Why is Paul Manafort the sole American indicted by Mueller who hasn't flipped? (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/3/28/1752858/-Why-does-Paul-Manafort-remain-the-sole-American-indicted-by-Mueller-who-hasn-t-flipped)
Ari Melber on Wednesday:
If you're President Trump and you knew Paul Manafort was in that key Trump Tower meeting with your son and son-in-law and if that was a quid pro quo where the Russians were offering dirt on Hillary Clinton in exchange for some kind of benefits, and you're worried about that, and
you want to make sure that Manafort doesn't get into the Mueller camp—
I guess one way of doing that is to offer a pardon.
The pardon prospect, which once seemed like somewhat of an outside chance, now seems to fulfill a lot of otherwise unanswerable questions about Manafort's continued posture.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/3/28/1752858/-Why-does-Paul-Manafort-remain-the-sole-American-indicted-by-Mueller-who-hasn-t-flipped?detail=emaildkre
Pavlov
03-29-2018, 02:55 PM
Why is Paul Manafort the sole American indicted by Mueller who hasn't flipped? (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/3/28/1752858/-Why-does-Paul-Manafort-remain-the-sole-American-indicted-by-Mueller-who-hasn-t-flipped)
Ari Melber on Wednesday:
If you're President Trump and you knew Paul Manafort was in that key Trump Tower meeting with your son and son-in-law and if that was a quid pro quo where the Russians were offering dirt on Hillary Clinton in exchange for some kind of benefits, and you're worried about that, and
you want to make sure that Manafort doesn't get into the Mueller camp—
I guess one way of doing that is to offer a pardon.
The pardon prospect, which once seemed like somewhat of an outside chance, now seems to fulfill a lot of otherwise unanswerable questions about Manafort's continued posture.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/3/28/1752858/-Why-does-Paul-Manafort-remain-the-sole-American-indicted-by-Mueller-who-hasn-t-flipped?detail=emaildkreThat and he prefers his tea without polonium.
boutons_deux
03-29-2018, 02:58 PM
Trump's allies move from attacking the Russia investigation, to attacking Robert Mueller as a person (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/3/28/1752793/-Trump-s-allies-move-from-attacking-the-Russia-investigation-to-attacking-Robert-Mueller-as-a-person)
Two weeks ago, Donald Trump took direct aim at Special Counsel Robert Mueller, going after his investigation by name and using the same kind of attacks (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/3/18/1749945/-Trump-takes-direct-aim-at-Robert-Mueller-using-same-tactic-as-he-used-on-Comey-and-McCabe) previously used to weaken the positions of James Comey and Andrew McCabe.
That willingness to directly paint the special counsel’s operation as a partisan effort threw open the door for Trump’s allies to attack Mueller from every front, and
now they’re pouring in (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/03/28/trump-mueller-russia-probe-488695),
attempting to create a view of Robert Mueller as a Clinton-loving bumbler with Mafia ties, who is neither fair nor a good investigator.
Republican legislators have gone to the point of pushing for a second special counsel on several occasions—just so that Mueller might then be called as witness, providing an excuse to end his investigation.
But Trump’s fresh signal to the alt-right could be the starting gun for an all-out push to rewrite the history of Robert Mueller.
The timing of multiple attacks on Mueller over multiple issues looks to many like more than a coincidence (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/03/28/trump-mueller-russia-probe-488695).
“It looks like the beginnings of a campaign,”
“It looks like they are trying to seed the ground.
Ultimately, if the president determines he wants to fire Mueller,
he’s going to want to make sure there’s ample public record that he can fall back on.”
The point is to turn Mueller into yet another in the line of Obama, Clinton, Yates, Comey and McCabe—f
igures that the right has turned into not just enemies,
but members of a “deep state” conspiracy. (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/03/28/trump-mueller-russia-probe-488695)
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/3/28/1752793/-Trump-s-allies-move-from-attacking-the-Russia-investigation-to-attacking-Robert-Mueller-as-a-person?detail=emaildkre
So Trash's supporters are lying about Mueller as "deep state" so when Trash fires Mueller, his supporters can say the firing is fully justified by our lies and slander against Mueller.
"ample public record" :lol
boutons_deux
03-29-2018, 03:06 PM
Devin Nunes to donors: You got what you wanted in my Trump-Russia cover-up, now pay me (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/3/28/1752749/-Devin-Nunes-is-fundraising-off-of-his-Trump-Russia-cover-up)
The message he sent to to conservative and Republican donors seems to basically be,
"I covered for Trump. Pay me."
Looking for contributions for his reelection campaign, Nunes claimed that he had gone through "a year of diverted resources and slanderous attacks from the far left over alleged ties between the Trump campaign and Russian hackers."
(Actually, there have been no serious allegations that the Trump campaign was in bed with the Russian "hackers" who targeted Democrats,
but there has been evidence (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/at-least-nine-people-in-trumps-orbit-had-contact-with-russians-during-campaign-and-transition/2017/11/05/07c9993c-bf4c-11e7-959c-fe2b598d8c00_story.html?utm_term=.0b5819262acf) that Trump campaign advisers were in contact with Russians while Moscow was waging its cyberattacks and information warfare against the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump.)
Having shuttered the Russia investigation,
Nunes bashes "liberals" for attempting "to keep their conspiracy alive" and
refusing to let "the intelligence community move on."
Nunes writes "we've reached a conclusion about collusion: there was none." That is because, as Mark Sumner explains, they weren't actually looking for it (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/3/23/1751396/-House-Republicans-issue-their-see-no-collusion-report-and-Trump-is-ready-to-use-it).
that's just what Republican expected, as Nunes very well knows. They're getting what they paid for, he's reminding them, as he demands the next installment.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/3/28/1752749/-Devin-Nunes-is-fundraising-off-of-his-Trump-Russia-cover-up?detail=emaildkre
So why doesn't Trash and his mafiya prove there was no collusion, rather than stone-walling and obstructing and lying?
Looks like... collusion.
Looks like...you don't know what the fuck you are talking about. van der Zwaan said Person A was discussing with Manafort/Gates possible criminal charges they may face in Ukraine for their work on the Tomyshenko report from 2012.
Pavlov
03-29-2018, 03:17 PM
Why did Trump hire Manafort and Gates?
Why did Trump hire Manafort and Gates?
I don't know you should ask him.
979414739213156352
:rollin
Pavlov
03-29-2018, 03:27 PM
I don't know you should ask him.He isn't here.
Give me your best guess as to why, out of everyone available, Trump chose to hire Manafort and Gates.
979442609427902464
979443222278586368
:rollin
RandomGuy
03-29-2018, 03:30 PM
Looks like...you don't know what the fuck you are talking about. van der Zwaan said Person A was discussing with Manafort/Gates possible criminal charges they may face in Ukraine for their work on the Tomyshenko report from 2012.
“Person A,” is described as a former GRU ... was in communication with Manafort and Gates during the 2016 campaign and had continued contact with Manafort’s former associates in Ukraine.
Thanks for confirming the "communication". :lol
Wonder what else they colluded on?
Pavlov
03-29-2018, 03:31 PM
979414739213156352
:rollin
979442609427902464
979443222278586368
:rollinHave you given to Mike Flynn's legal defense fund?
koriwhat
03-29-2018, 03:33 PM
979414739213156352
:rollin
fuck mccabe and his family. i hope they all rot in hell for being traitors.
“Person A,” is described as a former GRU ... was in communication with Manafort and Gates during the 2016 campaign and had continued contact with Manafort’s former associates in Ukraine.
Thanks for confirming the "communication". :lol
Wonder what else they colluded on?
You'd think if they colluded with Russia to sway the election that would have been mentioned in van der Zwaan's sentencing memorandum, it wasn't.
Have you given to Mike Flynn's legal defense fund?
No, but I did donate to Robyn Gritz and you should do the same.
https://www.gofundme.com/fighting-fbi-discrimination-and-cor
Pavlov
03-29-2018, 03:44 PM
No, but I did donate to Robyn Gritz and you should do the same.
https://www.gofundme.com/fighting-fbi-discrimination-and-corWhy didn't you donate to Mike Flynn?
He's got a website and everything.
https://mikeflynndefensefund.org
Fancier than gofundme tbh.
979442156006866944
hmm sounds familiar
:lol TSA
FlAVaK
03-29-2018, 03:55 PM
That and he prefers his tea without polonium.
:bobo sad but true :lol
spurraider21
03-29-2018, 04:03 PM
fuck mccabe and his family. i hope they all rot in hell for being traitors.
the day isn't complete until koriwhat demands the death of multiple people
RandomGuy
03-29-2018, 04:32 PM
You'd think if they colluded with Russia to sway the election that would have been mentioned in van der Zwaan's sentencing memorandum, it wasn't.
See, Yanukovych had been overthrown by then, and the new Ukrainian government was investigating the payments to Skadden for that Very Serious Report. And what a coincidence that Van der Zwaan failed to produce an email from Kilimnik dated September 12, 2016, in which the Ukrainian asks “to exchange a few words via WhatsApp or Telegram,” i.e. asked for an off-the-record conversation.
This seems BAD, huh?
Yeah, it does! You’ve got Manafort and Gates knowingly doing business with a member of the Russian intelligence GRU during the campaign around the time the RNC mysteriously changed its stance on Russian intervention in Ukraine. You’ve got a record of “additional payments” that may well bolster the money-laundering case against Paul Manafort. And you’ve got a lawyer who knew goddamn well that lying to the FBI was a crime, and now he’d like to avoid jail time, please, because he came clean eventually.
Read more at https://wonkette.com/631890/who-is-this-handsome-young-lawyer-and-why-bob-mueller-gonna-throw-him-in-jail#akV2QltMAll6qGbO.99
djohn2oo8
03-29-2018, 04:39 PM
979470772380098560
:lmao
koriwhat
03-29-2018, 04:40 PM
...
you're a walking contradiction. that's all i get from your lame duck reply. read what you quoted and ask yourself again if i wished death on mccabe. you obviously are a very special retard. btw, hell isn't punishment enough for that scumbag.
dabom
03-29-2018, 04:40 PM
979470772380098560
:lmao
:lmao
spurraider21
03-29-2018, 04:44 PM
you're a walking contradiction. that's all i get from your lame duck reply. read what you quoted and ask yourself again if i wished death on mccabe. you obviously are a very special retard. btw, hell isn't punishment enough for that scumbag.
i don't think you know what contradiction means
yeah. wish them to eternal damnation, but not death :lol
Read more at https://wonkette.com/631890/who-is-this-handsome-young-lawyer-and-why-bob-mueller-gonna-throw-him-in-jail#akV2QltMAll6qGbO.99
The RNC strengthened their stance on Russia you dipshit. And I see you still haven't read the van der Zwaan sentencing memorandum.
:lol wonkette
djohn2oo8
03-29-2018, 05:29 PM
979480774352269312
But TSA sedddddd they were only going after Gates for past crimes.
979480774352269312
But TSA sedddddd they were only going after Gates for past crimes.
Your own article says they are only going after Gates for past crimes :rollin
djohn2oo8
03-29-2018, 05:58 PM
Your own article says they are only going after Gates for past crimes :rollin
Damn you can't read. They are using Gates to confirm collusion. :lol
Chris
03-29-2018, 06:17 PM
979071089778229249
979071089778229249
Chris, guess what the end of that investigation will end up as?
"The FBI and DOJ followed protocols etc etc."
The end.
You can quote this post later if you want.
djohn2oo8
03-29-2018, 06:25 PM
Chris, guess what the end of that investigation will end up as?
"The FBI and DOJ followed protocols etc etc."
The end.
You can quote this post later if you want.
Chris doesn't know the difference between initiate and end.
Chris
03-29-2018, 06:27 PM
Chris, guess what the end of that investigation will end up as?
"The FBI and DOJ followed protocols etc etc."
The end.
You can quote this post later if you want.
lmao
Pavlov
03-29-2018, 06:28 PM
979071089778229249Wait, they're only starting now?
:lmao
Chris
03-29-2018, 06:32 PM
Wait, they're only starting now?
:lmao
Today is the 29th :tu
Pavlov
03-29-2018, 06:34 PM
Today is the 29th :tuThey only started yesterday?
:lmao
They only started yesterday?
:lmao
Horowitz is not announcing this investigative avenue from a position of only now starting to gather evidence; he already has the evidence. He is now announcing the context for him to drop a report summarizing findings of content from the investigation; a report that has nothing to do with the original launch of the OIG investigation.
In essence he’s announcing the need to write a report based on investigative material he has already gathered. Horowitz already has the material.
- Your Daddy
Chris, guess what the end of that investigation will end up as?
"The FBI and DOJ followed protocols etc etc."
The end.
You can quote this post later if you want.
Quote it to laugh at how stupid it was?
djohn2oo8
03-29-2018, 07:01 PM
No basis for second special counsel.
No basis for second special counsel.
You still haven’t read the Sessions letter that YOU posted :rollin
djohn2oo8
03-29-2018, 07:13 PM
You still haven’t read the Sessions letter that YOU posted :rollin
Does the letter say there is a need for a 2nd special counsel? :rollin
spurraider21
03-29-2018, 07:14 PM
after weeks of WE NEED SPECIAL COUNSEL
now its "lol you guys are suckers, we dont even need a special counsel :lol"
Quote it to laugh at how stupid it was?
TSA, the author of pizzagate calling anyone stupid? :lmao
Pavlov
03-29-2018, 07:17 PM
Horowitz is not announcing this investigative avenue from a position of only now starting to gather evidence; he already has the evidence. He is now announcing the context for him to drop a report summarizing findings of content from the investigation; a report that has nothing to do with the original launch of the OIG investigation.
In essence he’s announcing the need to write a report based on investigative material he has already gathered. Horowitz already has the material.
- Your Daddy:lol you can't even read sentences or quote correctly
:lmao "In essence"
djohn2oo8
03-29-2018, 07:17 PM
after weeks of WE NEED SPECIAL COUNSEL
now its "lol you guys are suckers, we dont even need a special counsel :lol"
:lol
5 consecutive nervous laughter emoticons in a row. Yup, shook.
djohn2oo8
03-29-2018, 08:15 PM
5 consecutive nervous laughter emoticons in a row. Yup, shook.
http://i.imgur.com/1HWQIPa.gif
Spurtacular
03-29-2018, 11:00 PM
5 consecutive nervous laughter emoticons in a row. Yup, shook.
:lmao Bitches called out.
:lmao A futile meme response by one of said bitches.
Spurtacular
03-29-2018, 11:00 PM
Blake gonna need a thread posts count for DJohn2oo8 vs. me. Get on that, cuck.
djohn2oo8
03-29-2018, 11:52 PM
Blake gonna need a thread posts count for DJohn2oo8 vs. me. Get on that, cuck.
*post
Spurtacular
03-30-2018, 12:13 AM
*post
Either would be acceptable, numb nuts.
:lol The real Dunning-Kruger poster.
Pavlov
03-30-2018, 03:36 AM
5 consecutive nervous laughter emoticons in a row. Yup, shook.You can neither read nor quote anymore. Yup, destroyed.
You can neither read nor quote anymore. Yup, destroyed.
:lol still upset I gave up on your word salad after you refused to clarify what you were trying to say
:lol your life
Pavlov
03-30-2018, 09:34 AM
:lol still upset I gave up on your word salad after you refused to clarify what you were trying to say
:lol your life
Nope. Try reading it again.
Try quoting it again.
You failed at both, Spurtacular.
RandomGuy
03-30-2018, 10:54 AM
“THAT’S RIGHT, TRUMP CAUGHT ROBERT MUELLER DOIN’ URANIUMS WITH HIS PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER, SEAN HANNITY TELLED ME THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT IT LAST NIGHT.”
ArgleBargle.
RandomGuy
03-30-2018, 10:59 AM
The more information that comes out from the OIG investigation into the politicization of the FBI/DOJ the more I am convinced that Mueller purposely assembled a team of Hillary supporters knowing the OIG would be investigating them while they investigated muh Russia. Remember that Trump met with Mueller privately the day before Mueller was named special counsel.
:rollin
RandomGuy
03-30-2018, 11:05 AM
He hasn’t been asked to drop any investigation. What are you trying to say?
And again, watch the hearing with Wray discussing the OIG investigation, his answers are telling. Wray is Trump’s guy and will be shoulder to shoulder with him exposing the corruption. I hold out hope Comey was a white hat who helped Mueller have an avenue to assemble a team of traitors for the IG to monitor and investigate. Don’t forget Trump met with Mueller the night before Mueller was named special counsel.
:lol
"team of traitors"
RandomGuy
03-30-2018, 11:08 AM
I'm of a differing opinion. I think Mueller has been in on it from the start and I think Trump and Mueller planned on loading the team up with Clinton stooges when they met the night before Mueller was appointed to Special Counsel. Give them the rope and let Horowitz hang them.
:rollin
RandomGuy
03-30-2018, 11:13 AM
Because you’re a dipshit who takes MSM reporting at face value.
The newest indictment has zero to do with Trump. The newest indictment is closely linked to the Clintons, the Clinton Foundation, the Podesta Group, the White House counsel to Obama/assistant to the President and special counsel in the White House for Clinton (Craig), and the associate White House counsel to Clinton (Sloan). These were the people directly involved with Manafort and his work in Ukraine and what got him indicted. None of this had anything to with Trump.
Bookmarking this shit, pizzaboichik
You will never live this post down. It will be more epic than your pizzagate fail.
Then what?
The only mystery to me at this point:
What excuse will you make when you turn out to be 100%, absolutely, positively wrong?
Bookmarking this shit, pizzaboichik
You will never live this post down. It will be more epic than your pizzagate fail.
Then what?
The only mystery to me at this point:
What excuse will you make when you turn out to be 100%, absolutely, positively wrong?
Why would you bookmark something that still holds true to what I said? None of the indictments have anything to do with Trump or the election. Have you not read the indictments or sentencing memorandum?
You've basically admitted your Trump/Russia collusion theory is dead. Meanwhile the OIG is working with Federal Prosecutors investigating all of the corrupt FBI/DOJ officials I've been talking about for months. How's that working out for McCabe?
RandomGuy
03-30-2018, 11:36 AM
Why would you bookmark something that still holds true to what I said? None of the indictments have anything to do with Trump or the election. Have you not read the indictments or sentencing memorandum?
What excuse will you make when you turn out to be 100%, absolutely, positively wrong?
RandomGuy
03-30-2018, 11:39 AM
You've basically admitted your Trump/Russia collusion theory is dead.
Not really. I have concluded that Trump is not fully compromised by Russia.
That is vastly different from "basically admitting that Trump didn't collude with Russia" merely that they don't appear to be blackmailing him.
The problem, even then, is that expelling diplomats when every other western power does so, isn't as conclusive as I would like.
What excuse will you make when you turn out to be 100%, absolutely, positively wrong?
I'll admit I was wrong, but at this point I'm 100% correct. None of the indictments have anything to do with Trump or the election.
Not really. I have concluded that Trump is not fully compromised by Russia.
That is vastly different from "basically admitting that Trump didn't collude with Russia" merely that they don't appear to be blackmailing him.
The problem, even then, is that expelling diplomats when every other western power does so, isn't as conclusive as I would like.
add in arming Ukraine and blowing the fuck up 200+ Russians in Syria with strategic bombers
RandomGuy
03-30-2018, 11:42 AM
I'll admit I was wrong
I would, and will, point out: yet again.
What will that say to you about the way you approach information, that your theories about what is reality fail, repeatedly, to bear out?
Will do maybe do some introspection? I wonder.
What conclusion could you reach about the way you approach reality?
RandomGuy
03-30-2018, 11:44 AM
add in arming Ukraine and blowing the fuck up 200+ Russians in Syria with strategic bombers
Some dinky sniper rifles: meh. The anti-tank weapons meant more, but one has to wonder why Tillerson was fired so shortly thereafter.
Trump didn't order that strike, and couldn't have know about it before hand, it happened too quickly, stupid mother fucker, Trump didn't order it.
I would, and will, point out: yet again.
What will that say to you about the way you approach information, that your theories about what is reality fail, repeatedly, to bear out?
Will do maybe do some introspection? I wonder.
What conclusion could you reach about the way you approach reality?
And yet I'm 100% correct at this point. When it is proven I was 100% correct the whole time and there never was Trump/Russia election collusion what will you do?
What excuse will you make when you turn out to be 100%, absolutely, positively wrong?
What will that say to you about the way you approach information?
What will that say about your theories that fail?
I wonder if you will do some introspection.
djohn2oo8
03-30-2018, 11:59 AM
And yet I'm 100% correct at this point. When it is proven I was 100% correct the whole time and there never was Trump/Russia election collusion what will you do?
What excuse will you make when you turn out to be 100%, absolutely, positively wrong?
What will that say to you about the way you approach information?
What will that say about your theories that fail?
I wonder if you will do some introspection.
So you admit you haven't been proven correct? Got it
clambake
03-30-2018, 12:18 PM
collusion is chickenfeed.
follow the money
djohn2oo8
03-30-2018, 12:20 PM
collusion is chickenfeed.
follow the money
Mueller is doing both.
So you admit you haven't been proven correct? Got it
When this is all over RandomGuy will just be embarrassed he was duped by the media, you'll be embarrassed and down $500 :lol
djohn2oo8
03-30-2018, 12:22 PM
When this is all over RandomGuy will just be embarrassed he was duped by the media, you'll be embarrassed and down $500 :lol
So you admit you have not been proven correct? Got it.
baseline bum
03-30-2018, 12:27 PM
And yet I'm 100% correct at this point.
Wasn't no one supposed to be indicted besides Susan Rice?
Wasn't no one supposed to be indicted besides Susan Rice?
Wasn't there supposed to be indictments for Trump/Russia election collusion?
Pavlov
03-30-2018, 12:33 PM
Wasn't there supposed to be indictments for Trump/Russia election collusion?:lol dodge #1
djohn2oo8
03-30-2018, 12:33 PM
Wasn't there supposed to be indictments for Trump/Russia election collusion?
You said no one indicted besides Susan Rice.
You said no one indicted besides Susan Rice.
I said no one indicted for Trump/Russia election collusion and I am still 100% correct.
Susan Rice isn't in the clear yet so I'm technically not wrong there either. She is definitely being looked at by OIG investigation.
djohn2oo8
03-30-2018, 12:44 PM
I said no one indicted for Trump/Russia election collusion and I am still 100% correct.
Susan Rice isn't in the clear yet so I'm technically not wrong there either. She is definitely being looked at by OIG investigation.
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-WVsA1TG3Mhw/UDHgq-tTdqI/AAAAAAAAAes/CLqIGagka54/s800/goalpost2.gif
Pavlov
03-30-2018, 12:46 PM
I said no one indicted for Trump/Russia election collusion and I am still 100% correct.
Susan Rice isn't in the clear yet so I'm technically not wrong there either. She is definitely being looked at by OIG investigation.Oh, now you have inside information about the IG investigation?
Tell us all about how they are looking at Susan Rice.
Be specific.
djohn2oo8
03-30-2018, 12:47 PM
Oh, now you have inside information about the IG investigation?
Tell us all about how they are looking at Susan Rice.
Be specific.
:lmao
You said no one indicted besides Susan Rice.
And you said Trump, Kushner, Ivanka, Don Jr were all going to prison...how's that working out for you?
djohn2oo8
03-30-2018, 12:49 PM
This thread will go down in Spurstalk history as the political forums GOAT when the only person indicted is Susan Rice
"The only person indicted"
djohn2oo8
03-30-2018, 12:50 PM
And you said Trump, Kushner, Ivanka, Don Jr were all going to prison...how's that working out for you?
They are. You seem scared. Oh and none of them have been cleared yet.
Oh, now you have inside information about the IG investigation?
Tell us all about how they are looking at Susan Rice.
Be specific.
https://oig.justice.gov/press/2018/2018-03-28b.pdf
djohn2oo8
03-30-2018, 12:58 PM
Oh look. TSA can't tell us himself.
Pavlov
03-30-2018, 12:58 PM
https://oig.justice.gov/press/2018/2018-03-28b.pdf:lol No mention of Rice.
Failure after failure.
Are you saying Rice committed a crime?
Yes or no.
"The only person indicted"
Still not a single person indicted for Trump/Russia election collusion.
:lol No mention of Rice.
No mention of McCabe either does that mean they aren't investigating him as well?
djohn2oo8
03-30-2018, 01:00 PM
Still not a single person indicted for Trump/Russia election collusion.
"The only person indicted"
Pavlov
03-30-2018, 01:00 PM
No mention of McCabe either does that mean they aren't investigating him as well?Are you saying Rice committed a crime?
Yes or no.
They are. You seem scared. Oh and none of them have been cleared yet.
We've already got $500 on Trump going to prison. Do you want to add Kushner, Ivanka, and Don Jr for another $500 each?
djohn2oo8
03-30-2018, 01:01 PM
We've already got $500 on Trump going to prison. Do you want to add Kushner, Ivanka, and Don Jr for another $500 each?
Of course.
Are you saying Rice committed a crime?
Yes or no.
Not sure tbh, we'll find out when the OIG wraps up their investigation.
Pavlov
03-30-2018, 01:01 PM
:lol muh bets
Of course.
:bobo easy money
:lol muh bets
:lol muh easy money
Pavlov
03-30-2018, 01:03 PM
Not sure tbh, we'll find out when the OIG wraps up their investigation.But you've already declared the Mueller investigation to be over.
You're the self-appointed sole arbiter of justice.
djohn2oo8
03-30-2018, 01:04 PM
But you've already declared the Mueller investigation to be over.
You're the self-appointed sole arbiter of justice.
lol
spurraider21
03-30-2018, 01:07 PM
I said no one indicted for Trump/Russia election collusion and I am still 100% correct.
Susan Rice isn't in the clear yet so I'm technically not wrong there either. She is definitely being looked at by OIG investigation.
so basically until the statute of limitations expires you're gonna hold out hope on this one? :lol
Pavlov
03-30-2018, 01:13 PM
so basically until the statute of limitations expires you're gonna hold out hope on this one? :lolSo far he's 100% right that blogs were written about her and we're 100% wrong that she hasn't not been not indicted.
so basically until the statute of limitations expires you're gonna hold out hope on this one? :lol
:bobo
Pavlov
03-30-2018, 01:15 PM
so basically until the statute of limitations expires you're gonna hold out hope on this one? :lolHe just declared the Smallville cult arrest a #pizzagate victory.
Pavlov
03-30-2018, 01:18 PM
TSA, you never answered why you thought Trump hired Manafort and Gates.
Best guess.
djohn2oo8
03-30-2018, 01:19 PM
TSA, you never answered why you thought Trump hired Manafort and Gates.
Best guess.
:lol
djohn2oo8
03-30-2018, 02:42 PM
979800435467915264
“I am a member of the European Council on Foreign relations”, he adds, “and you know which is the only foundation I am member of? The Clinton Foundation."
http://www.repubblica.it/esteri/2017/11/01/news/russiagate_mystery_professor_joseph_mifsud_speaks_ out_dirt_on_hillary_clinton_nonsense_-179948962/?refresh_ce
979737606006169600
979752638404231174
Pavlov
03-30-2018, 03:42 PM
“I am a member of the European Council on Foreign relations”, he adds, “and you know which is the only foundation I am member of? The Clinton Foundation."
http://www.repubblica.it/esteri/2017/11/01/news/russiagate_mystery_professor_joseph_mifsud_speaks_ out_dirt_on_hillary_clinton_nonsense_-179948962/?refresh_ce
979737606006169600
979752638404231174What's your conspiracy theory today, TSA?
What's your conspiracy theory today, TSA?
Just posting news Pavlov...carry on.
Pavlov
03-30-2018, 03:45 PM
Just posting news Pavlov...carry on.But what is your conspiracy theory today, TSA?
Don't be shy.
spurraider21
03-30-2018, 03:46 PM
you're just posting *ding*
you're just posting *ding*
Those aren't dings.
But what is your conspiracy theory today, TSA?
Don't be shy.
Don't have one Pavlov...just posting news.
djohn2oo8
03-30-2018, 03:59 PM
Don't have one Pavlov...just posting news.
*ding*
Pavlov
03-30-2018, 04:11 PM
Don't have one Pavlov...just posting news.lol TSAdan
koriwhat
03-30-2018, 04:40 PM
yeah. wish them to eternal damnation, but not death :lol
exactly you fucking retard trying to mold my words into your bs narrative. fuck off bitch!
keep arguing your bs points made up in your head. fuck those bastards the mccabe's. hope they burn in hell whenever the day comes.
clambake
03-30-2018, 04:48 PM
another koriwhat drive-by.
koriwhat
03-30-2018, 04:53 PM
another koriwhat drive-by.
another pointless and dumbass attention whoring post by clambake...
koriwhat
03-30-2018, 04:56 PM
...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.