Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[TSA]

1098034937024966656

[Spurs Homer]

The OIG specifically said he lied for personal gain and did not lie for the FBI/USA :rollin

Why did the USA patriot lie multiple times while under oath to the OIG and the FBI?

McCabe was authorized to speak to the media and he did.

Trump put the hit on McCabe and met with Republicans in Congress to back him up in obstructing the investigation. You never wondered why suddenly Gaetz,Jordan,Nunes idiots - starting going after "the investigators"

Ever wonder why Trump would target a guy who specialized in Russian counter-intelligence?

Finally - McCabe's record was spotless for 21 years - but suddenly - after Trumps henchmen and Fox news howl about a "2nd special counsel" and sic the IG on him -

suddenly McCabe is dishonest?

GTFO of here with that russian tactics bullshit. McCabe will win his suit and/or get reinstated.

Oh yeah -

McCabe is accused of lying to the media - the "enemy of the people" and you are really upset at him!

:lmao:lmao

[TSA]

McCabe was authorized to speak to the media and he did.

Trump put the hit on McCabe and met with Republicans in Congress to back him up in obstructing the investigation. You never wondered why suddenly Gaetz,Jordan,Nunes idiots - starting going after "the investigators"

Ever wonder why Trump would target a guy who specialized in Russian counter-intelligence?

Finally - McCabe's record was spotless for 21 years - but suddenly - after Trumps henchmen and Fox news howl about a "2nd special counsel" and sic the IG on him -

suddenly McCabe is dishonest?

GTFO of here with that russian tactics bullshit. McCabe will win his suit and/or get reinstated.

Oh yeah -

McCabe is accused of lying to the media - the "enemy of the people" and you are really upset at him!

:lmao:lmao

:lol reduced to attacking the Obama appointed IG and defending a proven liar. Well done comrade.

[Spurs Homer]

Comrade TSA -

"I don't care - I believe Putin!"

Are you ever going to man up and answer my long long long standing question:

"Why - are you defending the guy that sided with the country that attacked the USA?"

[TSA]

McCabe will win his suit and/or get reinstated.

$2000 days he doesn’t.

[Spurs Homer]

:lol reduced to attacking the Obama appointed IG and defending a proven liar. Well done comrade.

Proven liar = Trump

you idiot

The IG was pressured by Republicans who are corrupt and are obstructing an investigation - this will come out.

Answer my question above -

Defending Russia at all costs like the traitor you are.

[TSA]

Comrade TSA -

"I don't care - I believe Putin!"

Are you ever going to man up and answer my long long long standing question:

"Why - are you defending the guy that sided with the country that attacked the USA?"

:lol sided with
:lol worst Russian puppet

[Spurs Homer]

here we go


:cry:cry "muh bets!"

[TSA]

Proven liar = Trump

you idiot

The IG was pressured by Republicans who are corrupt and are obstructing an investigation - this will come out.

Answer my question above -

Defending Russia at all costs like the traitor you are.


:lol doubling down on attacking the Obama appointed IG

[TSA]

here we go


:cry:cry "muh bets!"

offer stands. the more shit you all throw the easier this gets.

[Spurs Homer]

offer stands. the more shit you all throw the easier this gets.

As if I want to do business with a known traitor to the USA.

:rollin:rollin

[Pavlov]

1098009053509357568

1098010967219281920Then he can testify under oath to a grand jury.

He has nothing to hide, right?

Nothing to fear?

[Winehole23]

A few interesting wrinkles in the attempted-expedited transfer of nuclear tech to Saudi first thrugh Flynn, then through Tom Barrack.

1097909931225894917

[Winehole23]

If this isn't foreign policy as crony capitalism I'm not sure what is.

[Winehole23]

:wow

1097963595143495685

[Winehole23]

fwiw, the Shugarman Twitter thread linked ^^^ is far more damning, and disturbing, than anything I've read in this one so far.

[Nbadan]

Netenyahu not going to be too happy about this..

[Winehole23]

Anyone who still thinks Flynn is an honorable man who got railroaded by an overbearing prosecutor should reevaluate.

If anything, getting off with plain vanilla charges of lying to investigators seems a tad on the lenient side.

[Winehole23]

Netenyahu not going to be too happy about this..Why is that?

[Chris]

A team of prosecutors con Mueller decided to go ahead with perjury charges after the FBI decided that Flynn was not lying. I know this has been reiterated several times ITT, but some posters like to spew nonsense.

[Pavlov]

A team of prosecutors con Mueller decided to go ahead with perjury charges after the FBI decided that Flynn was not lying. I know this has been reiterated several times ITT, but some posters like to spew nonsense.Flynn decided Flynn was lying.

[Chris]

Flynn decided Flynn was lying.

Flynn had to sell his house just to show up to court. His hand has been forced since inception. Flynn doesn't get to make decisions.

[Pavlov]

Flynn had to sell his house just to show up to court. His hand has been forced since inception. Flynn doesn't get to make decisions.Yes he did.

He decided he lied.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1098093318972440577

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1098093318972440577Any sex will be consensual.

[spurraider21]

A team of prosecutors con Mueller decided to go ahead with perjury charges after the FBI decided that Flynn was not lying. I know this has been reiterated several times ITT, but some posters like to spew nonsense.
Flynn wasn’t charged with perjury.

FBI never said Flynn didn’t lie. They said at the time there was no indication he was lying.

[pgardn]

Flynn is a good guy...

Holy shit.

This thread reawakening under a different title yet again.
How many complete turds can one large turd surround himself with...
The bestest people and the bestest healthcare. Biggly.

[pgardn]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1098093318972440577

This is getting way ahead of the game.
We still have to see how much of a scumbag this self proclaimed scumbag is.

Then we can discuss his willingness to take butt shots out of loyalty.

[RandomGuy]

If this isn't foreign policy as crony capitalism I'm not sure what is.

Actually heard one NPR analyst resort to using the word "bonkerballs" to describe the monumental stupidity. I personally prefer the term fuckbonkers.

[RandomGuy]

Flynn is a good guy...

Holy shit.

This thread reawakening under a different title yet again.
How many complete turds can one large turd surround himself with...
The bestest people and the bestest healthcare. Biggly.

Stone is the latest and will not be the last.

Trump is less a "good businessman" and more of a shit/corruption magnet.

[Winehole23]

A team of prosecutors con Mueller decided to go ahead with perjury charges after the FBI decided that Flynn was not lying. I know this has been reiterated several times ITT, but some posters like to spew nonsense.as usual, you can't accurately state either the facts or the cover story.

how do you account for Flynn working for Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Russia in 2016-7?

[Winehole23]

what do you think, Chris, of Trump trying to transfer nuclear tech to Saudi Arabia?

[boutons_deux]

The Wall Street Journal argues Trump may have committed too many crimes to be investigated (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/2/19/1836054/-The-Wall-Street-Journal-argues-Trump-may-have-committed-too-many-crimes-to-be-investigated)

As Jonathan Chait, writing for New York Magazine (http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/02/trump-so-many-crimes-investigate-congress-russia-mueller.html)observes, the Journal serves as a useful predictor or “early warning” about the right’s latest political strategy

Chait helpfully distills the essence of Rivkin's thesis for us:
In other words, Trump can’t be investigated because he is such a massive crook.

The president could function when he was defending one private lawsuit and one financial investigation,

but not when he is defending a series of elaborate global rackets. :lol

It’s just a simple matter of time management. :lol

Trump can’t do his job if he has to defend all these crimes. :lol



The problem with Rivkin's argument is that it smacks squarely into

the Supreme Court's ruling in Clinton v Jones,

in which the Clinton Administration similarly argued that forcing a sitting President to undergo

an inquiry into behavior that had allegedly occurred before he assumed office

would be so distracting that it would impair the functions of government.

The Supreme Court’s unanimous rejection of that argument

was gleefully received by the impeachment proponents in the Republican Party,

with nary a whisper of objection or dissent by any prominent Republican voices.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/2/19/1836054/-The-Wall-Street-Journal-argues-Trump-may-have-committed-too-many-crimes-to-be-investigated?utm_campaign=trending

And we all know Trash's day is horribly overburdened as he works hard at governing 20 hours /
day.

Ain't Nobody Got Time For ... defending against a litany of crime.

[Spurs Homer]

The Wall Street Journal argues Trump may have committed too many crimes to be investigated (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/2/19/1836054/-The-Wall-Street-Journal-argues-Trump-may-have-committed-too-many-crimes-to-be-investigated)

As Jonathan Chait, writing for New York Magazine (http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/02/trump-so-many-crimes-investigate-congress-russia-mueller.html)observes, the Journal serves as a useful predictor or “early warning” about the right’s latest political strategy

Chait helpfully distills the essence of Rivkin's thesis for us:
In other words, Trump can’t be investigated because he is such a massive crook.

The president could function when he was defending one private lawsuit and one financial investigation,

but not when he is defending a series of elaborate global rackets. :lol

It’s just a simple matter of time management. :lol

Trump can’t do his job if he has to defend all these crimes. :lol



The problem with Rivkin's argument is that it smacks squarely into

the Supreme Court's ruling in Clinton v Jones,

in which the Clinton Administration similarly argued that forcing a sitting President to undergo

an inquiry into behavior that had allegedly occurred before he assumed office

would be so distracting that it would impair the functions of government.

The Supreme Court’s unanimous rejection of that argument

was gleefully received by the impeachment proponents in the Republican Party,

with nary a whisper of objection or dissent by any prominent Republican voices.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/2/19/1836054/-The-Wall-Street-Journal-argues-Trump-may-have-committed-too-many-crimes-to-be-investigated?utm_campaign=trending

And we all know Trash's day is horribly overburdened as he works hard at governing 20 hours /
day.

Ain't Nobody Got Time For ... defending against a litany of crime.



The first time in years that the WSJ has posted something honest:

Trump has committed so many crimes that PROSECUTORS cannot handle the workload.


Solution: Resign yesterday.

[Winehole23]

too crooked to indict

[Spurs Homer]

too crooked to indict

Well that is his 2nd defense I've seen -

the other is: he is obstructing/committing crimes out in the open everyday - so they cannot possibly be crimes

[TSA]

what do you think, Chris, of Trump trying to transfer nuclear tech to Saudi Arabia?

If not the US than Russia or China will provide the tech.

[TSA]

Theres a reason McCabe is allowed to be going around and talking about the book, like Rosenstein stepping down. :)Why is McCabe not talking at all about the dossier, Steele, or Ohr?

"In Mr. McCabe’s “The Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and Trump,” there is no dossier mention. A word search also shows no reference to Mr. Steele or Mr. Ohr."

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/feb/19/andrew-mccabe-memoir-mum-on-anti-trump-dossier-sca/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=socialnetwork

[djohn2oo8]

Why is McCabe not talking at all about the dossier, Steele, or Ohr?

"In Mr. McCabe’s “The Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and Trump,” there is no dossier mention. A word search also shows no reference to Mr. Steele or Mr. Ohr."

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/feb/19/andrew-mccabe-memoir-mum-on-anti-trump-dossier-sca/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=socialnetwork
Probably because none of them will be charged unlike the whole damn Trump campaign :lol

[RandomGuy]

Why is McCabe not talking at all about the dossier, Steele, or Ohr?

"In Mr. McCabe’s “The Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and Trump,” there is no dossier mention. A word search also shows no reference to Mr. Steele or Mr. Ohr."

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/feb/19/andrew-mccabe-memoir-mum-on-anti-trump-dossier-sca/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=socialnetwork


So when is Hillary going to be targeted again? Was Roger Stone helping her? :lmao

[TSA]

Probably because none of them will be charged unlike the whole damn Trump campaign :lol

McCabe is under a grand jury investigation. Why did he not once mention the dossier, Steele, or Ohr in his book?

[boutons_deux]

If not the US than Russia or China will provide the tech.

:lol

What has been stopping them?

[TSA]

So when is Hillary going to be targeted again? Was Roger Stone helping her? :lmao


Odd timing for one of the leaders of the resistance to show up considering how the Russian collusion case is looking. Welcome back RG :bobo I hope you'll stay long enough this time to eat your crow.

[Winehole23]

If not the US than Russia or China will provide the tech.so then, you see the USA, the richest and most powerful country in the world, as having no sway with Saudi and as being essentially helpless to do anything else but transfer US nuclear tech to Saudi immediately, bypassing all legal and institutional safeguards?

that's hilarious, but I don't think you actually believe that.

[TSA]

so then, you see the USA, the richest and most powerful country in the world, as having no sway with Saudi and as being essentially helpless to do anything else but transfer US nuclear tech to Saudi immediately, bypassing all legal and institutional safeguards?

that's hilarious, but I don't think you actually believe that.

that's hilarious, but I don't think you actually believe that.

[Winehole23]

that's exactly what it has been alleged Flynn and Barrack were doing.

[Winehole23]

complete radio silence from team Trump on this wrinkle:

1098234531402915841

[RandomGuy]

Odd timing for one of the leaders of the resistance to show up considering how the Russian collusion case is looking. Welcome back RG :bobo I hope you'll stay long enough this time to eat your crow.

The Russian collusion case is looking better with each new filing. When they finally arrest Don Jr., I would love to be a fly on the wall.

[TSA]

The Russian collusion case is looking better with each new filing. When they finally arrest Don Jr., I would love to be a fly on the wall.

Explain how with each new filing that has nothing to do with Trump/Russia election collusion the case for Trump/Russia election collusion is looking better.

[TSA]

complete radio silence from team Trump on this wrinkle:

1098234531402915841

Weird. I can't see the tweet from my desktop on Firefox. Anyone else running into this?

[TSA]

Weird. I can't see the tweet from my desktop on Firefox. Anyone else running into this?

I can see the tweet from my phone.

[in2deep]

complete radio silence from team Trump on this wrinkle:

1098234531402915841

What about team Clinton? As Nader was buddy buddy with them as well...

https://twitter.com/usapatriotkag/status/1083755195434262528?s=21

[TSA]

What about team Clinton? As Nader was buddy buddy with them as well...

https://twitter.com/usapatriotkag/status/1083755195434262528?s=21

Nader is being represented by Obama's former White House counsel :lol

https://i2.wp.com/truepundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/2018-03-13_09h30_53.png?fit=708%2C501&ssl=1

[Winehole23]

I thought Trump was cracking down on that sort of thing. Nader's usefulness must have been compelling to overllok his background.

Feel free to spell out Nader's connection to the Clintons. Seems George Nader and Andrew Epstein are two things Trump and the Bill Clinton share in common.

[Spurs Homer]

Comrade TSA even defended selling nuke technology to Saudi because...

because...


whataboutism!

"so - if not us - then Russia or china"

just another DEFENSE of the people who sold out the USA.

What does it say that an american citizen (?) TSA - would defend people who are working AGAINST the USA?

Comrade TSA - always in mother russia's corner!

[RandomGuy]

Explain how with each new filing that has nothing to do with Trump/Russia election collusion the case for Trump/Russia election collusion is looking better.

oooh a snuck premise. Explain how each new filing about Trump/Russia collusion doesn't have anything to do with Trump/Russia colluion. See how that works?

Meh.

We have little clue what is under the redacted portions of a lot of these filings, but the fact that they have lengthy portions next to "trump russia" parts, would seem there is something there to describe.

So many people getting ganked for lying about meetings with Russians, one has to wonder where the fire is...

I am, as always happy to wait. There is enough out there to point to something that the Trump administration is desperate to cover up.

[TSA]

oooh a snuck premise. Explain how each new filing about Trump/Russia collusion doesn't have anything to do with Trump/Russia colluion. See how that works?

Meh.

We have little clue what is under the redacted portions of a lot of these filings, but the fact that they have lengthy portions next to "trump russia" parts, would seem there is something there to describe.

So many people getting ganked for lying about meetings with Russians, one has to wonder where the fire is...

I am, as always happy to wait. There is enough out there to point to something that the Trump administration is desperate to cover up.

It's easy to explain how each new filing has nothing to do with Trump/Russia collusion....there is literally nothing in each new filing that says anything about Trump/Russia collusion.

[RandomGuy]

[I think signatories to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty will ignore it, because it would make Trump look less incompetent]

um... sure.

[RandomGuy]

If not the US than Russia or China will provide the tech.

Soooo if we don't execute journalists for criticizing Putin, Russia will?

Moral relativism fail.

[RandomGuy]

It's easy to explain how each new filing has nothing to do with Trump/Russia collusion....there is literally nothing in each new filing that says anything about Trump/Russia collusion.

So you've read the redacted parts? Fill me in.

What do they say?

[spurraider21]

Trump putting pedos in positions of power to pwn the libs

[Pavlov]

McCabe is under a grand jury investigation. Why did he not once mention the dossier, Steele, or Ohr in his book?
FBI probably didn't let him.

Simple explanation.

[TSA]

oooh a snuck premise. Explain how each new filing about Trump/Russia collusion doesn't have anything to do with Trump/Russia colluion. See how that works?

Meh.

We have little clue what is under the redacted portions of a lot of these filings, but the fact that they have lengthy portions next to "trump russia" parts, would seem there is something there to describe.

So many people getting ganked for lying about meetings with Russians, one has to wonder where the fire is...

I am, as always happy to wait. There is enough out there to point to something that the Trump administration is desperate to cover up.

1097980273218805761

Should we do Carter Page next? Oh wait the "main cog" in Russian collusion was never indicted :lol

[in2deep]

I thought Trump was cracking down on that sort of thing. Nader's usefulness must have been compelling to overllok his background.

Feel free to spell out Nader's connection to the Clintons. Seems George Nader and Andrew Epstein are two things Trump and the Bill Clinton share in common.


Muellers star witness a proven Clinton donor and friend and pictured partying it up with Bill in Punta Cana.

yeah no connection there :lol nothing to see here

[RandomGuy]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DtnddhBU0AE3HiS.jpg

Fun time with fill in the blank.

[Pavlov]

complete radio silence from team Trump on this wrinkle:

1098234531402915841TSA avoiding the question posted in the tweet.

Pedophiles good now.

[RandomGuy]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DtnddhBU0AE3HiS.jpg

Fun time with fill in the blank.

[RandomGuy]

What does TSA think is redacted here?

Let's see.

[Flynn, the defendant helped with] "a criminal investigation" (blank)"the Special Counsel's Office ("SCO") investigation concerning any links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the Campaign of Donald Trump, (BLANK).

"provided documents and communications" (BLANK)


I'm sure it is all about Hillary in the redacted parts. :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

FBI probably didn't let him.

Simple explanation.
DOJ to be exact. DOJ lawyers.

[RandomGuy]

[tweeet]1097980273218805761[/tweet]

Should we do Carter Page next? Oh wait the "main cog" in Russian collusion was never indicted :lol

Perhaps you can tell me how the Flynn document memo for the judge that specifically mentioned the help he gave for the Trump/Russia investigation as part of the reason he should get leniency has nothing to do with the Trump Russia investigation? :rollin

[djohn2oo8]

TSA wants to talk about Grand Juries when multiple Trump campaign members have been under the same investigations and have actually been indicted. Manafort to prison for the rest of his life. Stone heading that Way. Gates to prison for 4 to 5 years. Cohen to prison for 3 years.

[Pavlov]

DOJ to be exact. DOJ lawyers.I guess. McCabe specifically said FBI in an interview and he seems pretty careful with his words.

[djohn2oo8]

Btw, as much as you try to spin it you can’t unrelate Stone’s Case from the GRU indictment. :)

[Pavlov]

TSA wants to talk about Grand Juries when multiple Trump campaign members have been under the same investigations and have actually been indicted. Manafort to prison for the rest of his life. Stone heading that Way. Gates to prison for 4 to 5 years. Cohen to prison for 3 years.Is it 60,000 sealed indictments ready to pwn the Dems, TSA?

100,000?

[RandomGuy]

[Flynn, the defendant helped with] "a criminal investigation" "child sex ring investigation into Hillary Clinton" "the Special Counsel's Office ("SCO") investigation concerning any links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the Campaign of Donald Trump, "Hillary's emails".

"provided documents and communications" "about how Hillary sold Uranium to the Russians through the Clinton foundation in exchange for sex slaves and virgin blood for cocktails"

[djohn2oo8]

Is it 60,000 sealed indictments ready to pwn the Dems, TSA?

100,000?
:lmao

[RandomGuy]

TSA wants to talk about Grand Juries when multiple Trump campaign members have been under the same investigations and have actually been indicted. Manafort to prison for the rest of his life. Stone heading that Way. Gates to prison for 4 to 5 years. Cohen to prison for 3 years.

LOL Stone.

I do not thing the Judge will appreciate his theatrics. At all.

[djohn2oo8]

LOL Stone.

I do not thing the Judge will appreciate his theatrics. At all.
We will surely find that out tomorrow.

[TSA]

FBI probably didn't let him.

Simple explanation.

Agreed. Along with the DOJ since they are currently investigating each.

[TSA]

TSA wants to talk about Grand Juries when multiple Trump campaign members have been under the same investigations and have actually been indicted. Manafort to prison for the rest of his life. Stone heading that Way. Gates to prison for 4 to 5 years. Cohen to prison for 3 years.

None of them are facing prison time for colluding with Russia during the election.

[Pavlov]

Agreed. Along with the DOJ since they are currently investigating each.What charges do you think are forthcoming from such investigations?

[djohn2oo8]

None of them are facing prison time for colluding with Russia during the election.
You said no one would go to jail besides Susan Rice. Det goalpost move though :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

Oh yeah then you said Hillary would be indicted twice

[Pavlov]

As far as I can see, at best TSA is hoping for some process crimes against not Hillary or Obama or anyone in his cabinet.

30,000 process crimes?

[djohn2oo8]

So TSA. Trump has hired 6 plus people who have committed felonies...

[TSA]

Btw, as much as you try to spin it you can’t unrelate Stone’s Case from the GRU indictment. :)

It's actually pretty simple to do. In Corsi's statement of offense Mueller made him admit that he lied to Stone when he claimed he had a Wikileaks back channel.

7. Following his September 10, 2018 interview, CORSI met with the Special Counsel’s Office for several additional interviews and voluntarily provided access to his email accounts and electronic devices. CORSI made numerous claims during these interviews, including that his representations to Person 1 (Roger Stone), beginning in August 2016, that he had a way of obtaining confidential information from Organization 1 (Wikileaks), were false.

https://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/politics/draft-jerome-corsi-statement-of-offense/3324/

[TSA]

You said no one would go to jail besides Susan Rice. Det goalpost move though :lmao

And you bet me $2000 that Trump, Trump Jr, Kusher, and Ivanka would all be in prison :lmao

[Winehole23]

TSA avoiding the question posted in the tweet.

Pedophiles good now.CLINTON DID IT TOO.

Values are all relative for these guys. Anything anyone else did, ever, opens the door to more of the same, so long as there's a magic (R) after the name.

[Pavlov]

The best part is that TSA just flip flopped on pedophiles to defend Trump.

How many young minds will be controlled by Cat Stevens songs now?

[TSA]

What charges do you think are forthcoming from such investigations?

Don't know what specific charges would be brought for abusing the FISA system.

[Pavlov]

Don't know what specific charges would be brought for abusing the FISA system.I will call my shot and say none for the actual FISA process.

None charges.

None abuse.

[TSA]

I will call my shot and say none.

That's a stupid call since people have already been indicted for lying to the FBI and McCabe not only lied to the FBI but also the IG.

[Pavlov]

That's a stupid call since people have already been indicted for lying to the FBI and McCabe not only lied to the FBI but also the IG.I will call my shot and say none for the actual FISA process.

[TSA]

I will call my shot and say none for the actual FISA process.

None charges.

None abuse.

:lol nice edit

[Pavlov]

:lol nice editI already said you're praying for process crimes, TSA.

Somehow, they count now when they didn't for Flynn, et.al.

[djohn2oo8]

I will call my shot and say none for the actual FISA process.

None charges.

None abuse.
:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

1098282086148988928

[Winehole23]

Like a cat covering a turd, TSA gettin busy with the distractions, trying to bury the bad news for Flynn.

[Trill Clinton]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DsDh0ZRVAAEuThV.jpg

Trump looks mighty comfy in that last pic, no homo

[djohn2oo8]

1098281171883040769

[TSA]

1098282086148988928

If Mueller's report comes out and says no collusion will you accept his answer?

[djohn2oo8]

If Mueller's report comes out and says no collusion will you accept his answer?
Well it won’t state that so I think I’ll be good :lol

[TSA]

Well it won’t state that so I think I’ll be good :lol
nervous laughter

If Mueller's report comes out and says no collusion will you accept his answer? yes or no.

[clambake]

nervous laughter

If Mueller's report comes out and says no collusion will you accept his answer? yes or no.

no

[djohn2oo8]

nervous laughter

If Mueller's report comes out and says no collusion will you accept his answer? yes or no.
Already gave you an answer. Your desperation stinks.

[TSA]

Already gave you an answer. Your desperation stinks.

You didn't answer the question. I asked "if" the report states no collusion. Just the thought of it stating no collusion has you shook and too scared to answer. Try again.

If Mueller's report comes out and says no collusion will you accept his answer? yes or no.

[djohn2oo8]

You didn't answer the question. I asked "if" the report states no collusion. Just the thought of it stating no collusion has you shook and too scared to answer. Try again.

If Mueller's report comes out and says no collusion will you accept his answer? yes or no.
It won’t :)

[spurraider21]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DsDh0ZRVAAEuThV.jpg

Trump looks mighty comfy in that last pic, no homo
https://images.immediate.co.uk/volatile/sites/3/2017/11/102_CRIME_111_Unit_03324R-b7406b8.jpeg?quality=90&resize=620,413

vs

https://nypdecider.files.wordpress.com/2018/10/daredevil-3-foggy-haircut.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=646&h=431&crop=1

[ElNono]

https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status/1097977167059795968

ding

[TSA]

It won’t :)

so shook

[Spurs Homer]

Astonishing

the level of devotion that comrade TSA displays to a madman

not even joking or trolling

just mind- boggling and astonishing.

putin would genuinely be proud
hitler would be proud
trump would be proud

just depressingly normal in this era.

[RandomGuy]

If Mueller's report comes out and says no collusion will you accept his answer?

Yup.

What will your excuse be if there is? I wonder.

[RandomGuy]

We will surely find that out tomorrow.

Stone is a bully, and has lived his entire life with few consequences for his bullying.

I do not think the judge will be very kind.

After Stones apology, his account posted a link to some blog that more than suggest the apology was less than genuine.

I think after Manafort's bullshit, her patience for this stuff has got to be razor thin.

[Trill Clinton]

https://images.immediate.co.uk/volatile/sites/3/2017/11/102_CRIME_111_Unit_03324R-b7406b8.jpeg?quality=90&resize=620,413

vs

https://nypdecider.files.wordpress.com/2018/10/daredevil-3-foggy-haircut.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=646&h=431&crop=1

Accurate

[RandomGuy]

I generally wait for all the evidence to come in before I offer an opinion. You have no such limitations.

Well if you didn't personally go out and investigate, you prove that you don't care.

:lol

[RandomGuy]

Astonishing

the level of devotion that comrade TSA displays to a madman

not even joking or trolling

just mind- boggling and astonishing.

putin would genuinely be proud
hitler would be proud
trump would be proud

just depressingly normal in this era.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/20/world/europe/russia-putin-state-of-the-nation.html


Russia will develop and deploy whatever weapons systems are needed to remain secure, Mr. Putin said, though, as he is well aware, a costly arms race in the 1980s, combined with sinking oil prices, contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union. His aggressive tone appeared to be intended, in part, to convinced Washington not to abandon the treaty.

“Among the ruling class” in the United States, he said, are many people who “are too captivated by ideas of their exceptionalism and their superiority over the entire rest of the world.”

“But do they know how to count?” he asked. “Surely they do. Let them first calculate the range and speed of our advanced weapons systems, and then make decisions on the threats against our country.”

Mr. Putin did not criticize President Trump, instead suggesting, as he has in the past, that a secretive “deep state” hobbled the American president.

[TSA]

Yup.

What will your excuse be if there is? I wonder.

I won't have an excuse and will accept Mueller's findings.

[TSA]

Ohr shit

1098263706453110786

[djohn2oo8]

I won't have an excuse and will accept Mueller's findings.
CROFL

[djohn2oo8]

You still haven’t accepted that pizzagate was a fucking hoax

[TSA]

CROFL

CROFL coming from the pussy too scared to answer a yes or no question. Watch.

If Mueller's report comes out and says no collusion will you accept his answer? yes or no.

[clambake]

no

[hater]

:lmao ppl thinking the Mueller report will conclude anything at all either way :lmao

Poor bastards being played like a fiddle

[djohn2oo8]

https://i1.wp.com/www.bookwormroom.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Michael-Wolff-gorilla-channel.jpg

[Winehole23]

The hype around the Steele dossier raised expectations insanely. Hard to imagine the eventual report will satisfy la cultish resistencia or tinhat Trumplandia.

[djohn2oo8]

The hype around the Steele dossier raised expectations insanely. Hard to imagine the eventual report will satisfy la cultish resistencia or tinhat Trumplandia.
Did it? Because people from Trumpland are going to prison for the exact things listed in it :lol

[Winehole23]

It suggested Putin has Trump by the short and curlies.

I could be wrong, but I doubt clear kompromat will be revealed.

Fwiw, I agree with other posters that short of direct conspiracy and kompromat that the revealed record so far is very damning.

But I also think the hype that you and Spurs Homer bring everyday will make the report seem less dramatic than it already is.

Y'all inflated Trump's legal culpability. That will have been a mistake when the report comes out.

[djohn2oo8]

It suggested Putin has Trump by the short and curlies.

I could be wrong, but I doubt clear kompromat will be revealed.

Fwiw, I agree with other posters that short of direct conspiracy and kompromat that the revealed record so far is very damning.

But I also think the hype that you and Spurs Homer bring everyday will make the report seem less dramatic than it already is.

Y'all inflated Trump's legal culpability. That will have been a mistake when the report comes out.
Trump’s legal culpability is he is under investigation in multiple ways, his businesses, Russia, etc. sorry that hasn’t been inflated

[djohn2oo8]

Ignorance doesn’t work in court and it has been proven now Trump has lied multiple times about Russia. That right there increases his culpability.

[djohn2oo8]

Not to mention his submitted answers to Mueller. Should those answer be lies that would very much expose him legally

[Winehole23]

Trump’s legal culpability is he is under investigation in multiple ways, his businesses, Russia, etc. sorry that hasn’t been inflatedinvestigation=/=culpability.

Talk of treason and conspiracy by Trump himself has been exaggerated, no doubt about it. Trolls like TSA will feel vindicated by the lack of smoking guns and criminal referrals in the eventual report, and you will be partly to blame, for raising expectations unreasonably.

[djohn2oo8]

investigation=/=culpability.

Talk of treason and conspiracy by Trump himself has been exaggerated, no doubt about it. Trollsnlike TSA will feel vindicated by the lack of amoming guns and criminal referrals in the eventual report, and you qill be partly to blame for it for raising expectations unreasonably.
So everyone on Trumps team acted on their own? :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

Trump literally dictated his sons statement about adoptions himself. So yeah that could be included in obstruction. But keep going though.

[Winehole23]

So everyone on Trumps team acted on their own? :lmaoTrump needn't have directed them, no. I think he knew he was surrounded by scoundrels and thieves, and I think he had an intuition they all stood to make a lot of money somehow. All on its own that's really bad, but it isn't necessarily treason or conspiracy.

If Trump unlocked the door of the house, that doesn't necessarily mean he knew what the thieves were going to steal or on behalf of whom they planned to do the stealing.

Where you see a treason syndicate, I see organized crime with compartmentalized knowledge and plausible deniability.

[Winehole23]

Trump literally dictated his sons statement about adoptions himself. So yeah that could be included in obstruction. But keep going though.it could be, sure.

thay's not treason or "collusion" though.

It'a obstruction.

[TSA]

Not to mention his submitted answers to Mueller. Should those answer be lies that would very much expose him legally

CROFL coming from the pussy too scared to answer a yes or no question. Watch.

If Mueller's report comes out and says no collusion will you accept his answer? yes or no.

[Winehole23]

Not to mention his submitted answers to Mueller. Should those answer be lies that would very much expose him legallyit very well might.

but Mueller might simply mention the deception without referral to any authority but the US Congress, and where would that leave us?

[TSA]

Once Mueller submits his report I expect we'll start seeing what Huber and Horowitz have been up to.

[hater]

Calling it now

The report will be heavily redacted and both retarded sides will say it vindicates them :lmao

Will bump this next week but saving ya lemmings some grief

[Trill Clinton]

From Reddit:

People need to realize this point is moot: whether or not Trump is actively aware, and intentionally operating on behalf of Russia, he has still done more in two years to advance the agenda of this hostile foreign nation, to the detriment of the US, than any other person in recent memory.

We seem hopelessly entangled in answering the question of whether he's knowingly operating on Russia's behalf and have neglected the fact that he is actively aiding Russia and harming us egregiously in the process. We have become blind to the what while we hunt for the why.

There is no circumstance where Trump ought not be immediately impeached for the things we have witnessed occur in plain sight. If you see someone on the street stabbing people, do you stand by on the sideline and ponder what events in this murderer's life led him to stab people? No, you remove him from the street and put him in a cell to prevent him from harming people, and then you uncover a motive.

Just consider what we know he has done:

He advanced a withdrawal from Syria - against all counsel of all relevant experts - to Russia's delight. No explanation for this was ever provided to the American people.

He has refused to enforce sanctions legally codified into law - and in some cases reversed standing sanctions on Russian companies. No explanation for this was ever provided to the American people.

He has denounced his own intelligence agencies in a press conference with Putin on election meddling - and publicly endorsed Putin's version of events. No explanation for this was ever provided to the American people.

He has conducted FIVE completely private meetings and conferences with Putin, and has gone to great lengths to prevent literally anyone, even people in his administration, from learning what was discussed. No explanation for this was ever provided to the American people.

He has lied countless times about having business interests in Russia, which have been clearly and undeniably proven false in extremely public ways. No explanation for this was ever provided to the American people.

He pulled out of the INF treaty, which allows Putin to create missiles that can threaten Europe with impunity, whereas before, there would be sanctions and severe penalties for doing so. The US already has all the weaponry that the INF would ban the development of, so this offers us literally nothing, while allowing Russia to develop powerful new weapons to challenge our allies. No explanation for this was ever provided to the American people.

Trump insults the President of Montenegro, a country I am extremely confident he never knew existed up until that point, for literally no apparent reason... except Putin was furious at them. There's quite literally no possible other justification for this. I dare someone to even try. And of course, no explanation was ever provided to the American people.

And no list would be complete without his repeated threats to pull out of NATO, over money, a move so catastrophically stupid, so inconceivably cosmically myopic, I truly can't express the profundity of the idiocy. Suffice to say, pulling out of NATO would be like the only guy in a prison yard with a shotgun just throwing it over the fence for absolutely no reason, suddenly giving the people with crude homemade shivs complete power. Again, no explanation beyond the pitiful ramblings of a single real estate con man was ever provided to the American people for this decision.
At every step, he has handed Russia enormous concessions with no justification. He takes Putin's word - a notorious liar - at face value, always, above all of his own countrymen, and even the people he himself hired to lead his agencies.

And just consider that very fact alone - the fact that Trump just keeps believing things, coincidentally the things Russia says - over what everyone in his own administration tell him. The CIA, FBI, and assorted US intelligence agencies are the largest and most equipped in the world. And Donald Trump just basically shrugged and said he believed Vladmir Putin instead - because... he seemed like a nice guy? The absurdity here is self-evident. Putin is the guy accused of the crime - interfering in our election - and the US president just believes his word over his own intelligence apparatus.

You cannot be a rational person and justify this. In no rational world is this defensible. This is either treason or profound and alarming incompetence and gullibility. There is no world, after Helsinki, where someone could have made the case that Donald Trump ought to keep acting as chief executive of the US.

Now let us also remember, Russia is nothing compared to the US. The US has infinitely more muscle than Russia. This is why the policy - right up until Trump - has been to deal with them through sanctions and military conflicts where necessary.

They agitate, they hit and run, but Russia is an organized crime state whose economy is nearly collapsed, whose leadership consists of a coalition of loosely allied kleptocrats, oligarchs, and billionaires, all of whom are just as likely to knife each other as their foreign adversaries.

Had Clinton won, she would have continued her policy she advanced at the State Department, and sanctioned Russia until Putin's government imploded from the stress of Putin's brutality and kleptocracy. Which, obviously, is why he pulled out all the stops to ensure Clinton did not win the election.

The evidence is unambiguous. Trump - for reasons we do not know but ought not really care - betrayed, is betraying the US to Putin's Russia, each and every day.

So, I ask - why do we care whether he's a card-carrying Russian agent enthusiastic about the cause, a victim of blackmail, a seeker of quid pro quo, or just a really gullible imbecile?

He is clearly and transparently committing treason right out in the open. He has sacrificed our security and our interests to advance Russia's. Ignorance is not an excuse here. Let the courts sort that out, but this is far and away grossly impeachable behavior, and a level of embarrassing and humiliating subservience the likes of which have never been witnessed from an American leader on the world stage.

And let's not forget - let's always footnote talk about Trump's treason with the fact that this is just one of MANYseparate, discrete, and unique massive, impeachable scandals. On top of pursuing the agenda of a hostile foreign nation, he also committed numerous acts of campaign finance violation, stood behind and refused to condemn nazis and white supremacists, publicly attacked private citizens and the media, condemned his own agents and agencies for legally investigating him, told nearly ten thousand lies about things ranging from serious to extremely mundane, appointed his own family members to positions far above their capacity (breaking many ethics laws and vetting procedures to do so and get them clearance).

And the list goes on. Seriously, it goes on and on and on and on. I could exhaust myself listing out the oaths Trump has betrayed, the crimes he has committed, the many more crimes he has probably committed, the constitutional amendments he has attacked or condemned, all of which, in and of themselves, should warrant impeachment or serious scrutiny.

The last President was impeached, by Republicans, for one - one - count of perjury, about a meaningless sexual exploit. Which was an actual example of a perjury trap, by the way, wherein the prosecutor gets the defendant on the stand, on the record, for a crime - in this case, the Whitewater investigations into Clinton's real estate dealings, and then questions him about something embarassing but irrelevant and not illegal, compelling the defendant to lie and commit perjury to prevent embarassment.

That's what Republicans thought qualified a previous President for impeachment.

And now we come to Trump, who has a list of genuine impeachable criteria so long I legitimately can't remember all of them in one go. of these things. All of these individual scandals or crimes or gross acts of idiocy demonstrating severely compromised judgment and ability to execute the powers of the office.

And then you add actual treason on top of it. A violation of America and its interests not only inconceivable in its treachery, but to a far, far, far weaker adversary.

So what the fukk is he still doing in the oval?

[boutons_deux]

William Barr is preparing to release Robert Mueller’s report as early as next week
https://www.salon.com/2019/02/20/william-barr-is-preparing-to-release-robert-muellers-report-as-early-as-next-week_partner/

To be accompanied by 1000s (more) lies and slander from Trash and his mafiya.

[Pavlov]

Once Mueller submits his report I expect we'll start seeing what Huber and Horowitz have been up to.
So you say nothing will come of the Mueller report

What do you say will come of the other two?

[DMC]

Well if you didn't personally go out and investigate, you prove that you don't care.

:lol

I dont care so I agree

[TSA]

From Reddit:

People need to realize this point is moot: whether or not Trump is actively aware, and intentionally operating on behalf of Russia, he has still done more in two years to advance the agenda of this hostile foreign nation, to the detriment of the US, than any other person in recent memory.

We seem hopelessly entangled in answering the question of whether he's knowingly operating on Russia's behalf and have neglected the fact that he is actively aiding Russia and harming us egregiously in the process. We have become blind to the what while we hunt for the why.

There is no circumstance where Trump ought not be immediately impeached for the things we have witnessed occur in plain sight. If you see someone on the street stabbing people, do you stand by on the sideline and ponder what events in this murderer's life led him to stab people? No, you remove him from the street and put him in a cell to prevent him from harming people, and then you uncover a motive.

Just consider what we know he has done:

He advanced a withdrawal from Syria - against all counsel of all relevant experts - to Russia's delight. No explanation for this was ever provided to the American people.

He has refused to enforce sanctions legally codified into law - and in some cases reversed standing sanctions on Russian companies. No explanation for this was ever provided to the American people.

He has denounced his own intelligence agencies in a press conference with Putin on election meddling - and publicly endorsed Putin's version of events. No explanation for this was ever provided to the American people.

He has conducted FIVE completely private meetings and conferences with Putin, and has gone to great lengths to prevent literally anyone, even people in his administration, from learning what was discussed. No explanation for this was ever provided to the American people.

He has lied countless times about having business interests in Russia, which have been clearly and undeniably proven false in extremely public ways. No explanation for this was ever provided to the American people.

He pulled out of the INF treaty, which allows Putin to create missiles that can threaten Europe with impunity, whereas before, there would be sanctions and severe penalties for doing so. The US already has all the weaponry that the INF would ban the development of, so this offers us literally nothing, while allowing Russia to develop powerful new weapons to challenge our allies. No explanation for this was ever provided to the American people.

Trump insults the President of Montenegro, a country I am extremely confident he never knew existed up until that point, for literally no apparent reason... except Putin was furious at them. There's quite literally no possible other justification for this. I dare someone to even try. And of course, no explanation was ever provided to the American people.

And no list would be complete without his repeated threats to pull out of NATO, over money, a move so catastrophically stupid, so inconceivably cosmically myopic, I truly can't express the profundity of the idiocy. Suffice to say, pulling out of NATO would be like the only guy in a prison yard with a shotgun just throwing it over the fence for absolutely no reason, suddenly giving the people with crude homemade shivs complete power. Again, no explanation beyond the pitiful ramblings of a single real estate con man was ever provided to the American people for this decision.
At every step, he has handed Russia enormous concessions with no justification. He takes Putin's word - a notorious liar - at face value, always, above all of his own countrymen, and even the people he himself hired to lead his agencies.

And just consider that very fact alone - the fact that Trump just keeps believing things, coincidentally the things Russia says - over what everyone in his own administration tell him. The CIA, FBI, and assorted US intelligence agencies are the largest and most equipped in the world. And Donald Trump just basically shrugged and said he believed Vladmir Putin instead - because... he seemed like a nice guy? The absurdity here is self-evident. Putin is the guy accused of the crime - interfering in our election - and the US president just believes his word over his own intelligence apparatus.

You cannot be a rational person and justify this. In no rational world is this defensible. This is either treason or profound and alarming incompetence and gullibility. There is no world, after Helsinki, where someone could have made the case that Donald Trump ought to keep acting as chief executive of the US.

Now let us also remember, Russia is nothing compared to the US. The US has infinitely more muscle than Russia. This is why the policy - right up until Trump - has been to deal with them through sanctions and military conflicts where necessary.

They agitate, they hit and run, but Russia is an organized crime state whose economy is nearly collapsed, whose leadership consists of a coalition of loosely allied kleptocrats, oligarchs, and billionaires, all of whom are just as likely to knife each other as their foreign adversaries.

Had Clinton won, she would have continued her policy she advanced at the State Department, and sanctioned Russia until Putin's government imploded from the stress of Putin's brutality and kleptocracy. Which, obviously, is why he pulled out all the stops to ensure Clinton did not win the election.

The evidence is unambiguous. Trump - for reasons we do not know but ought not really care - betrayed, is betraying the US to Putin's Russia, each and every day.

So, I ask - why do we care whether he's a card-carrying Russian agent enthusiastic about the cause, a victim of blackmail, a seeker of quid pro quo, or just a really gullible imbecile?

He is clearly and transparently committing treason right out in the open. He has sacrificed our security and our interests to advance Russia's. Ignorance is not an excuse here. Let the courts sort that out, but this is far and away grossly impeachable behavior, and a level of embarrassing and humiliating subservience the likes of which have never been witnessed from an American leader on the world stage.

And let's not forget - let's always footnote talk about Trump's treason with the fact that this is just one of MANYseparate, discrete, and unique massive, impeachable scandals. On top of pursuing the agenda of a hostile foreign nation, he also committed numerous acts of campaign finance violation, stood behind and refused to condemn nazis and white supremacists, publicly attacked private citizens and the media, condemned his own agents and agencies for legally investigating him, told nearly ten thousand lies about things ranging from serious to extremely mundane, appointed his own family members to positions far above their capacity (breaking many ethics laws and vetting procedures to do so and get them clearance).

And the list goes on. Seriously, it goes on and on and on and on. I could exhaust myself listing out the oaths Trump has betrayed, the crimes he has committed, the many more crimes he has probably committed, the constitutional amendments he has attacked or condemned, all of which, in and of themselves, should warrant impeachment or serious scrutiny.

The last President was impeached, by Republicans, for one - one - count of perjury, about a meaningless sexual exploit. Which was an actual example of a perjury trap, by the way, wherein the prosecutor gets the defendant on the stand, on the record, for a crime - in this case, the Whitewater investigations into Clinton's real estate dealings, and then questions him about something embarassing but irrelevant and not illegal, compelling the defendant to lie and commit perjury to prevent embarassment.

That's what Republicans thought qualified a previous President for impeachment.

And now we come to Trump, who has a list of genuine impeachable criteria so long I legitimately can't remember all of them in one go. of these things. All of these individual scandals or crimes or gross acts of idiocy demonstrating severely compromised judgment and ability to execute the powers of the office.

And then you add actual treason on top of it. A violation of America and its interests not only inconceivable in its treachery, but to a far, far, far weaker adversary.

So what the fukk is he still doing in the oval?

:lol add in Trump's support to overthrow Maduro

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/01/putin-asks-and-trump-delivers-here-is-a-list-of-all-the-good-things-trump-did-for-russia.html

Trump deploys TANKS to Estonia as NATO builds up HUGE army on Russian border - Express, Feb 7 2017

Trump launches attack on Syria with 59 Tomahawk missiles - CNBC, Apr 6 2017

U.S. Rejects Exxon Mobil Bid for Waiver on Russia Sanctions - NYT, Apr 21 2017

Trump to promote U.S. natgas exports in Russia's backyard - Reuters, Jul 3 2017

Trump Urges East Europe to Loosen Russia's Grip With U.S. Gas - Bloomberg, Jul 6 2017

Trump signs bill approving new sanctions against Russia - CNN, Aug 3, 2017

Justice Dept Asks Russia's RT to Register as Foreign Agent - Newsmax, Sep 13 2017

US 'to restrict Russian military flights over America' - Independent, Sep 26 2017

Trump signs into law U.S. government ban on Kaspersky Lab software - Reuters, Dec 12 2017

Trump gives green light to selling lethal arms to Ukraine - The Hill, Dec 20 2017

U.S. Punishes Chechen Leader in New Sanctions Against Russians - NYT, Dec 20 2017

Sputnik Partner 'Required To Register' Under U.S. Foreign-Agent Law - RFERL, Jan 10 2018

Trump says Russia is helping North Korea avoid sanctions - CBSNews, Jan 17 2018

Trump's 'energy dominance' strategy is undercutting Russia's influence and business in Europe - Reuters, Feb 9 2018

Trump looks to deter Russia, China with $686B ask for Pentagon - The Hill, Feb 12 2018

American General In Syria Confirms US Forces Killed Hundreds Of Russians In Massive Battle - The Drive, Mar 16 2018

Trump orders expulsion of 60 Russian diplomats, closure of Seattle consulate - CBS, Mar 26 2018

Trump vows periodical dispatch of US troops to Baltic states, step up air defense - Lithuania Tribune, Apr 3 2018

Trump opposes Nord Stream II, questions Germany - AA, Apr 4 2018

Trump just hit Russian oligarchs with the most aggressive sanctions yet - Vice, Apr 6 2018

Trump orders missile strike on Syria military targets - CBSNews, Apr 9 2018

Aluminum Stocks Jump As Trump Sanctions Target Putin Pal - Investors, Apr 9 2018

Russia ‘deeply disappointed’ at Trump’s withdrawal from Iran deal - Times of Israel, May 9 2018

Trump to NATO allies: Raise military spending to 4 percent of GDP - AlJazeerah, Jul 12 2018

Trump says U.S. ties to NATO ‘very strong’ - Politico, Jul 12 2018

U.S. to sanction Turkey for receiving S-400 missiles - Ahval, Jul 27 2018

Trump administration to hit Russia with new sanctions for Skripal poisoning - NBC News Aug 8 2018

Space Force Is Trump’s Answer to New Russian and Chinese Weapons - FP, Aug 10 2018

US Sanctions Chinese Entity Over Purchase of Russian Fighters, S-400s – Treasury - Sputnik, Sep 20 2018

Trump hints at punitive action against India for buying S-400 from Russia - India Today, Oct 11 2018

Trump Agrees to Boost Pentagon's Budget to $750 Bln in 2019 - Reports - Sputnik, Oct 12 2018

Trump says US will withdraw from nuclear arms treaty with Russia - Guardian, Oct 21 2018

Haley Condemns ‘Outrageous’ Russian Firing on Ukrainian Ships - Bloomberg, Nov 26 2018

2 Trump Moves Cost This Russian-American CEO $2.3B - Forbes, Jan 14 2019

[TSA]

:lol add in Trump's support to overthrow Maduro

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/01/putin-asks-and-trump-delivers-here-is-a-list-of-all-the-good-things-trump-did-for-russia.html

Trump deploys TANKS to Estonia as NATO builds up HUGE army on Russian border - Express, Feb 7 2017

Trump launches attack on Syria with 59 Tomahawk missiles - CNBC, Apr 6 2017

U.S. Rejects Exxon Mobil Bid for Waiver on Russia Sanctions - NYT, Apr 21 2017

Trump to promote U.S. natgas exports in Russia's backyard - Reuters, Jul 3 2017

Trump Urges East Europe to Loosen Russia's Grip With U.S. Gas - Bloomberg, Jul 6 2017

Trump signs bill approving new sanctions against Russia - CNN, Aug 3, 2017

Justice Dept Asks Russia's RT to Register as Foreign Agent - Newsmax, Sep 13 2017

US 'to restrict Russian military flights over America' - Independent, Sep 26 2017

Trump signs into law U.S. government ban on Kaspersky Lab software - Reuters, Dec 12 2017

Trump gives green light to selling lethal arms to Ukraine - The Hill, Dec 20 2017

U.S. Punishes Chechen Leader in New Sanctions Against Russians - NYT, Dec 20 2017

Sputnik Partner 'Required To Register' Under U.S. Foreign-Agent Law - RFERL, Jan 10 2018

Trump says Russia is helping North Korea avoid sanctions - CBSNews, Jan 17 2018

Trump's 'energy dominance' strategy is undercutting Russia's influence and business in Europe - Reuters, Feb 9 2018

Trump looks to deter Russia, China with $686B ask for Pentagon - The Hill, Feb 12 2018

American General In Syria Confirms US Forces Killed Hundreds Of Russians In Massive Battle - The Drive, Mar 16 2018

Trump orders expulsion of 60 Russian diplomats, closure of Seattle consulate - CBS, Mar 26 2018

Trump vows periodical dispatch of US troops to Baltic states, step up air defense - Lithuania Tribune, Apr 3 2018

Trump opposes Nord Stream II, questions Germany - AA, Apr 4 2018

Trump just hit Russian oligarchs with the most aggressive sanctions yet - Vice, Apr 6 2018

Trump orders missile strike on Syria military targets - CBSNews, Apr 9 2018

Aluminum Stocks Jump As Trump Sanctions Target Putin Pal - Investors, Apr 9 2018

Russia ‘deeply disappointed’ at Trump’s withdrawal from Iran deal - Times of Israel, May 9 2018

Trump to NATO allies: Raise military spending to 4 percent of GDP - AlJazeerah, Jul 12 2018

Trump says U.S. ties to NATO ‘very strong’ - Politico, Jul 12 2018

U.S. to sanction Turkey for receiving S-400 missiles - Ahval, Jul 27 2018

Trump administration to hit Russia with new sanctions for Skripal poisoning - NBC News Aug 8 2018

Space Force Is Trump’s Answer to New Russian and Chinese Weapons - FP, Aug 10 2018

US Sanctions Chinese Entity Over Purchase of Russian Fighters, S-400s – Treasury - Sputnik, Sep 20 2018

Trump hints at punitive action against India for buying S-400 from Russia - India Today, Oct 11 2018

Trump Agrees to Boost Pentagon's Budget to $750 Bln in 2019 - Reports - Sputnik, Oct 12 2018

Trump says US will withdraw from nuclear arms treaty with Russia - Guardian, Oct 21 2018

Haley Condemns ‘Outrageous’ Russian Firing on Ukrainian Ships - Bloomberg, Nov 26 2018

2 Trump Moves Cost This Russian-American CEO $2.3B - Forbes, Jan 14 2019

1097488349697323009

[djohn2oo8]

Once Mueller submits his report I expect we'll start seeing what Huber and Horowitz have been up to.
Let me know if you find that Susan Rice indictment

[TSA]

So you say nothing will come of the Mueller report

What do you say will come of the other two?

If I knew what were coming from the other two I wouldn't have said "we'll start seeing what Huber and Horowitz have been up to"

[djohn2oo8]

If I knew what were coming from the other two I wouldn't have said "we'll start seeing what Huber and Horowitz have been up to"
How do you know if they have been up to anything if you don’t think they have been?

[TSA]

Let me know if you find that Susan Rice indictment

Let me know when your pussy ass finds enough courage to answer a simple yes or no question.

If Mueller's report comes out and says no collusion will you accept his answer? yes or no.

[Pavlov]

If I knew what were coming from the other two I wouldn't have said "we'll start seeing what Huber and Horowitz have been up to":lol can't even guess anymore.

Probably best for you considering your track record.

[TSA]

How do you know if they have been up to anything if you don’t think they have been?

Reading comprehension is hard when you are shook and running from simple yes or no questions :lol I never said they have been not been up to anything.

Matt Whitaker confirmed this in his recent testimony to the House Judiciary

Whitaker confirms DOJ official John Huber is looking into alleged misconduct by the FBI or DOJ.

Republican lawmakers also asked Whitaker about whether DOJ official Bruce Ohr was still working at the department.

Ohr is at the center of several right-wing conspiracy theories about a department-wide effort to oust Trump from the presidency. Ohr's wife, Nellie, worked for the opposition-research firm Fusion GPS during the 2016 election. Fusion GPS was hired by the Hillary Clinton campaign to dig up dirt on Trump, and the firm in turn commissioned the ex-British spy Christopher Steele to investigate Trump's ties to Russia.

Steele ultimately produced what's become known as the Steele dossier, an explosive collection of memos alleging collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Both the FBI and Senate Intelligence Community are using the document as a "roadmap" in their respective Russia investigations.

There is no evidence that Ohr was involved in producing the dossier, or that he acted improperly in his role as a DOJ official.

Nonetheless, Trump supporters and several GOP lawmakers have seized on Ohr's connection to his wife to suggest he was working on behalf of the Clinton campaign to undermine Trump's candidacy and presidency.

Whitaker also struck a different tone when asked questions about whether the DOJ was conducting an investigation into alleged misconduct by department officials and the FBI during the 2016 election. Whitaker refused to answer questions about Mueller's probe, citing the sensitivity of an ongoing investigation. But when asked about any investigations into DOJ or FBI misconduct, Whitaker confirmed that department official John Huber was looking into the claims.

https://www.businessinsider.com/matthew-whitaker-testimony-house-judiciary-committee-2019-2#whitaker-confirms-doj-official-john-huber-is-looking-into-alleged-misconduct-by-the-fbi-or-doj-7

[djohn2oo8]

Reading comprehension is hard when you are shook and running from simple yes or no questions :lol I never said they have been not been up to anything.

Matt Whitaker confirmed this in his recent testimony to the House Judiciary

Whitaker confirms DOJ official John Huber is looking into alleged misconduct by the FBI or DOJ.

Republican lawmakers also asked Whitaker about whether DOJ official Bruce Ohr was still working at the department.

Ohr is at the center of several right-wing conspiracy theories about a department-wide effort to oust Trump from the presidency. Ohr's wife, Nellie, worked for the opposition-research firm Fusion GPS during the 2016 election. Fusion GPS was hired by the Hillary Clinton campaign to dig up dirt on Trump, and the firm in turn commissioned the ex-British spy Christopher Steele to investigate Trump's ties to Russia.

Steele ultimately produced what's become known as the Steele dossier, an explosive collection of memos alleging collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Both the FBI and Senate Intelligence Community are using the document as a "roadmap" in their respective Russia investigations.

There is no evidence that Ohr was involved in producing the dossier, or that he acted improperly in his role as a DOJ official.

Nonetheless, Trump supporters and several GOP lawmakers have seized on Ohr's connection to his wife to suggest he was working on behalf of the Clinton campaign to undermine Trump's candidacy and presidency.

Whitaker also struck a different tone when asked questions about whether the DOJ was conducting an investigation into alleged misconduct by department officials and the FBI during the 2016 election. Whitaker refused to answer questions about Mueller's probe, citing the sensitivity of an ongoing investigation. But when asked about any investigations into DOJ or FBI misconduct, Whitaker confirmed that department official John Huber was looking into the claims.

https://www.businessinsider.com/matthew-whitaker-testimony-house-judiciary-committee-2019-2#whitaker-confirms-doj-official-john-huber-is-looking-into-alleged-misconduct-by-the-fbi-or-doj-7
So what do you think will come of it? Because last time before you got embarrassed you said Comey would be charged

[TSA]

:lol can't even guess anymore.

Probably best for you considering your track record.

Nothing wrong with saying I don't know. You do it all the time when I ask you questions.

[Pavlov]

Nothing wrong with saying I don't know. You do it all the time when I ask you questions.Probably best for you considering your track record.

[TSA]

So what do you think will come of it? Because last time before you got embarrassed you said Comey would be charged

bro....you bet me $2000 that Trump, Trump Jr, Ivanka, and Kushner would all be in prison. You've got no room talking about anyone being embarrassed about a prediction.

I know you're still embarrassed because I can ask you simple questions you refuse to answer. Watch.

If Mueller's report comes out and says no collusion will you accept his answer? yes or no.

[koriwhat]

So what do you think will come of it? Because last time before you got embarrassed you said Comey would be charged

comey can still be charged... what's ST's retard extraordinaire djohn getting at?

[djohn2oo8]

comey can still be charged... what's ST's retard extraordinaire djohn getting at?
Charged with what?

[Pavlov]

comey can still be charged... what's ST's retard extraordinaire djohn getting at?Are you saying he's going to be charged?

With what?

[boutons_deux]

Of course, Trash's sycophants were "looking into" "claims", "allegations" made by Trash, Repugs into Trash's enemies at FBI and DoJ.

Mueller releases report(s) exclusively to DoJ Barr

who then releases how much to Congress?,

then how much of the (undoubtedly redacted) Barr version of Mueller report will be released by the Dems?

How long after Mueller reports will Trash fire Mueller and his team?

Why can't Mueller release a series of reports over weeks or months? Sez who he has to dump a single report one time only?

[koriwhat]

bro....you bet me $2000 that Trump, Trump Jr, Ivanka, and Kushner would all be in prison. You've got no room talking about anyone being embarrassed about a prediction.

I know you're still embarrassed because I can ask you simple questions you refuse to answer. Watch.

If Mueller's report comes out and says no collusion will you accept his answer? yes or no.

he doesn't even know what collusion means tbh.

[Spurs Homer]

From Reddit:

People need to realize this point is moot: whether or not Trump is actively aware, and intentionally operating on behalf of Russia, he has still done more in two years to advance the agenda of this hostile foreign nation, to the detriment of the US, than any other person in recent memory.

We seem hopelessly entangled in answering the question of whether he's knowingly operating on Russia's behalf and have neglected the fact that he is actively aiding Russia and harming us egregiously in the process. We have become blind to the what while we hunt for the why.

There is no circumstance where Trump ought not be immediately impeached for the things we have witnessed occur in plain sight. If you see someone on the street stabbing people, do you stand by on the sideline and ponder what events in this murderer's life led him to stab people? No, you remove him from the street and put him in a cell to prevent him from harming people, and then you uncover a motive.

Just consider what we know he has done:

He advanced a withdrawal from Syria - against all counsel of all relevant experts - to Russia's delight. No explanation for this was ever provided to the American people.

He has refused to enforce sanctions legally codified into law - and in some cases reversed standing sanctions on Russian companies. No explanation for this was ever provided to the American people.

He has denounced his own intelligence agencies in a press conference with Putin on election meddling - and publicly endorsed Putin's version of events. No explanation for this was ever provided to the American people.

He has conducted FIVE completely private meetings and conferences with Putin, and has gone to great lengths to prevent literally anyone, even people in his administration, from learning what was discussed. No explanation for this was ever provided to the American people.

He has lied countless times about having business interests in Russia, which have been clearly and undeniably proven false in extremely public ways. No explanation for this was ever provided to the American people.

He pulled out of the INF treaty, which allows Putin to create missiles that can threaten Europe with impunity, whereas before, there would be sanctions and severe penalties for doing so. The US already has all the weaponry that the INF would ban the development of, so this offers us literally nothing, while allowing Russia to develop powerful new weapons to challenge our allies. No explanation for this was ever provided to the American people.

Trump insults the President of Montenegro, a country I am extremely confident he never knew existed up until that point, for literally no apparent reason... except Putin was furious at them. There's quite literally no possible other justification for this. I dare someone to even try. And of course, no explanation was ever provided to the American people.

And no list would be complete without his repeated threats to pull out of NATO, over money, a move so catastrophically stupid, so inconceivably cosmically myopic, I truly can't express the profundity of the idiocy. Suffice to say, pulling out of NATO would be like the only guy in a prison yard with a shotgun just throwing it over the fence for absolutely no reason, suddenly giving the people with crude homemade shivs complete power. Again, no explanation beyond the pitiful ramblings of a single real estate con man was ever provided to the American people for this decision.
At every step, he has handed Russia enormous concessions with no justification. He takes Putin's word - a notorious liar - at face value, always, above all of his own countrymen, and even the people he himself hired to lead his agencies.

And just consider that very fact alone - the fact that Trump just keeps believing things, coincidentally the things Russia says - over what everyone in his own administration tell him. The CIA, FBI, and assorted US intelligence agencies are the largest and most equipped in the world. And Donald Trump just basically shrugged and said he believed Vladmir Putin instead - because... he seemed like a nice guy? The absurdity here is self-evident. Putin is the guy accused of the crime - interfering in our election - and the US president just believes his word over his own intelligence apparatus.

You cannot be a rational person and justify this. In no rational world is this defensible. This is either treason or profound and alarming incompetence and gullibility. There is no world, after Helsinki, where someone could have made the case that Donald Trump ought to keep acting as chief executive of the US.

Now let us also remember, Russia is nothing compared to the US. The US has infinitely more muscle than Russia. This is why the policy - right up until Trump - has been to deal with them through sanctions and military conflicts where necessary.

They agitate, they hit and run, but Russia is an organized crime state whose economy is nearly collapsed, whose leadership consists of a coalition of loosely allied kleptocrats, oligarchs, and billionaires, all of whom are just as likely to knife each other as their foreign adversaries.

Had Clinton won, she would have continued her policy she advanced at the State Department, and sanctioned Russia until Putin's government imploded from the stress of Putin's brutality and kleptocracy. Which, obviously, is why he pulled out all the stops to ensure Clinton did not win the election.

The evidence is unambiguous. Trump - for reasons we do not know but ought not really care - betrayed, is betraying the US to Putin's Russia, each and every day.

So, I ask - why do we care whether he's a card-carrying Russian agent enthusiastic about the cause, a victim of blackmail, a seeker of quid pro quo, or just a really gullible imbecile?

He is clearly and transparently committing treason right out in the open. He has sacrificed our security and our interests to advance Russia's. Ignorance is not an excuse here. Let the courts sort that out, but this is far and away grossly impeachable behavior, and a level of embarrassing and humiliating subservience the likes of which have never been witnessed from an American leader on the world stage.

And let's not forget - let's always footnote talk about Trump's treason with the fact that this is just one of MANYseparate, discrete, and unique massive, impeachable scandals. On top of pursuing the agenda of a hostile foreign nation, he also committed numerous acts of campaign finance violation, stood behind and refused to condemn nazis and white supremacists, publicly attacked private citizens and the media, condemned his own agents and agencies for legally investigating him, told nearly ten thousand lies about things ranging from serious to extremely mundane, appointed his own family members to positions far above their capacity (breaking many ethics laws and vetting procedures to do so and get them clearance).

And the list goes on. Seriously, it goes on and on and on and on. I could exhaust myself listing out the oaths Trump has betrayed, the crimes he has committed, the many more crimes he has probably committed, the constitutional amendments he has attacked or condemned, all of which, in and of themselves, should warrant impeachment or serious scrutiny.

The last President was impeached, by Republicans, for one - one - count of perjury, about a meaningless sexual exploit. Which was an actual example of a perjury trap, by the way, wherein the prosecutor gets the defendant on the stand, on the record, for a crime - in this case, the Whitewater investigations into Clinton's real estate dealings, and then questions him about something embarassing but irrelevant and not illegal, compelling the defendant to lie and commit perjury to prevent embarassment.

That's what Republicans thought qualified a previous President for impeachment.

And now we come to Trump, who has a list of genuine impeachable criteria so long I legitimately can't remember all of them in one go. of these things. All of these individual scandals or crimes or gross acts of idiocy demonstrating severely compromised judgment and ability to execute the powers of the office.

And then you add actual treason on top of it. A violation of America and its interests not only inconceivable in its treachery, but to a far, far, far weaker adversary.

So what the fukk is he still doing in the oval?

post of the new year so far...

here is my thought to all this;

The FBI always gets their man.
Trump is fucked.

[djohn2oo8]

bro....you bet me $2000 that Trump, Trump Jr, Ivanka, and Kushner would all be in prison. You've got no room talking about anyone being embarrassed about a prediction.

I know you're still embarrassed because I can ask you simple questions you refuse to answer. Watch.

If Mueller's report comes out and says no collusion will you accept his answer? yes or no.
Child pedophile sex rings while people sip on coke and eat pizza. You’re a sick fuck.

[koriwhat]

Are you saying he's going to be charged?

With what?

we're all waiting patiently just like yall suckers are waiting for "russian collusion".

[Pavlov]

we're all waiting patiently just like yall suckers are waiting for "russian collusion".:lol I'm not waiting for Comey to be charged with anything.

Because he won't be charged with anything.

[TSA]

bro....you bet me $2000 that Trump, Trump Jr, Ivanka, and Kushner would all be in prison. You've got no room talking about anyone being embarrassed about a prediction.

I know you're still embarrassed because I can ask you simple questions you refuse to answer. Watch.

If Mueller's report comes out and says no collusion will you accept his answer? yes or no.


Child pedophile sex rings while people sip on coke and eat pizza. You’re a sick fuck.

Called it.

[koriwhat]

:lol I'm not waiting for Comey to be charged with anything.

Because he won't be charged with anything.

well he did infact perjure himself on the hill and that's just 1 thing... if flynn can go down for not lying(agent's own assessment the 1st time around) but then made to look like he was lying then comey can go down too.

btw, i never said you were waiting on comey to get what's coming to him. you're a sheep of the spineless political demographic and i'd never think you'd go against what you're told to prop up.

[djohn2oo8]

Called it.
Yeah. Incorrectly. Captain Comet Ping pong :lol

[Pavlov]

well he did infact perjure himself on the hill and that's just 1 thing... if flynn can go down for not lying(agent's own assessment the 1st time around) but then made to look like he was lying then comey can go down too.

btw, i never said you were waiting on comey to get what's coming to him. you're a sheep of the spineless political demographic and i'd never think you'd go against what you're told to prop up.:lmao you're afraid to say where you get your news.

:lol tough guy

[TSA]

Yeah. Incorrectly. Captain Comet Ping pong :lol

Called it completely correct. You refused to answer. You'll do it again right now, watch.

If Mueller's report comes out and says no collusion will you accept his answer? yes or no.

[koriwhat]

:lmao you're afraid to say where you get your news.

:lol tough guy

cspan dipshit. i watched him on the hill. so scared...

btw, keep calling me scared while i keep showing you dipshits how scared yall truly are. want to meet up? lmao!

[Pavlov]

cspan dipshit. i watched him on the hill. so scared...

btw, keep calling me scared while i keep showing you dipshits how scared yall truly are. want to meet up? lmao!What was the lie, tough guy?

[Spurs Homer]

Amazing interview by mccabe with nicole wallace

ive been wondering about rosenstein and cannot figure out if he is a trump accomplice, a patriot, a weasel

??

he has kowtowed to trump - but then on the other hand- appointed mueller

i had also noticed a little bit of uneasiness on mccabe when asked about rosenstein
- he seems to throw rosenstein under the bus then turns around and compliments him - but doesnt sound too convincing?

today nccabe revealed that he combined trumps name with the original russia investigation - and combined obstuction and counter intel based on evidence that linked trump to both

meaning

rosenstein - if he had had designs of being trumps boy and hiding shit

had his hands tied because the cases had gone out all over the bureau and could not be separated from trumps actions

had rosenstein or sessions tried any funny business - they would have been exposed

it also left rosenstein with no choice but to appoint a special counsel

i think rank and file also did not trust rosenstein after his memo to firecomey

mccabe also revealed that he read trumps original memo of firing comey

in that memo

dumbshit trump listed one of the reasons for firing comey

was- because comey had not fired mccabe - trump showing how badly ha wanted mccabe fired

[TSA]

Amazing interview by mccabe with nicole wallace

ive been wondering about rosenstein and cannot figure out if he is a trump accomplice, a patriot, a weasel

??

he has kowtowed to trump - but then on the other hand- appointed mueller

i had also noticed a little bit of uneasiness on mccabe when asked about rosenstein
- he seems to throw rosenstein under the bus then turns around and compliments him - but doesnt sound too convincing?

today nccabe revealed that he combined trumps name with the original russia investigation - and combined obstuction and counter intel based on evidence that linked trump to both

meaning

rosenstein - if he had had designs of being trumps boy and hiding shit

had his hands tied because the cases had gone out all over the bureau and could not be separated from trumps actions

had rosenstein or sessions tried any funny business - they would have been exposed

it also left rosenstein with no choice but to appoint a special counsel

i think rank and file also did not trust rosenstein after his memo to firecomey

mccabe also revealed that he read trumps original memo of firing comey

in that memo

dumbshit trump listed one of the reasons for firing comey

was- because comey had not fired mccabe - trump showing how badly ha wanted mccabe fired


:cry lying and throwing your own agents under the bus to cover your own lies
:cry lying to the FBI/OIG for personal gain
:cry McCabe the true USA patriot

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/mattgaetz/status/1098227341048930304

Herr Gaetz

[Spurs Homer]

:cry lying and throwing your own agents under the bus to cover your own lies
:cry lying to the FBI/OIG for personal gain
:cry McCabe the true USA patriot

you saw with your own eyes /heard with your own ears how trump personally attacked mccabe

i wish i was in an fbi position and the usa president attacked me personally and ordered his henchmen to take me out

i would eventually get paid and my pension would be reinstated by a court of law

you saw this

yet you still think mccabe is the bad guy

only a brainwashed cult zombie thinks like that

[Winehole23]

So 1910s and 1920s to rag on Americans for German surnames.

[TSA]

you saw with your own eyes /heard with your own ears how trump personally attacked mccabe

i wish i was in an fbi position and the usa president attacked me personally and ordered his henchmen to take me out

i would eventually get paid and my pension would be reinstated by a court of law

you saw this

yet you still think mccabe is the bad guy

only a brainwashed cult zombie thinks like that

I’m not sure why I continue to go back and forth with you when you don’t even have the basic facts correct.

Trump didn’t tell the OIG to investigate McCabe. The Obama appointed Inspector General was called on by Democrats to investigate the FBI’s handling of the Clinton email investigation. McCabe got caught lying multiple times during these interviews with FBI/OIG.


:lol Democrat’s doing Trump’s bidding calling for IG investigation
:lol Obama appointed IG Trump’s henchmen

[spurraider21]

They aren’t all under a Grand Jury investigation ya dumbass.

I’ll ask you again, why is this patriot under a Grand Jury investigation at the recommendation of the Obama appointed IG?


I’ll ask you again, why is this patriot under a Grand Jury investigation at the recommendation of the Obama appointed IG?


Manafort is going to prison for hiding lobbying work he did in Ukraine with Tony Podesta and Obama’s White House Counsel Greg Craig. McCabe’s investigation is still ongoing.

I’ll ask you again, why is this patriot under a Grand Jury investigation at the recommendation of the Obama appointed IG?


:lol doubling down on attacking the Obama appointed IG


:lol reduced to attacking the Obama appointed IG and defending a proven liar. Well done comrade.


I’m not sure why I continue to go back and forth with you when you don’t even have the basic facts correct.

Trump didn’t tell the OIG to investigate McCabe. The Obama appointed Inspector General was called on by Democrats to investigate the FBI’s handling of the Clinton email investigation. McCabe got caught lying multiple times during these interviews with FBI/OIG.


:lol Democrat’s doing Trump’s bidding calling for IG investigation
:lol Obama appointed IG Trump’s henchmen
guys im having trouble remembering, who appointed Horowitz?

[TSA]

guys im having trouble remembering, who appointed Horowitz?

Sad that Spurs Homer still can’t get it correct

[TSA]

1098369147631816709

[Chris]

djohn dreading that Mueller report :lol

[spurraider21]

impeachment crowd is going to be disappointed. imo this whole saga would have been a lot shorter if trump didn't fire comey because of the russia thing

im hard pressed to believe we're going to be seeing fresh indictments with the report around the corner

[boutons_deux]

"obvious point to stress is that he has not yet made a single indictment alleging a Trump-Russia conspiracy"

The more obvious point is that he is saving the Trash as traitorous colluder charge for the grande finale after rolling up, flipping so many of Trash's mafiya.

... then there is SDNY that Trash failed to corrupt. Why did he try to corrupt SDNY? what is he hiding?

Why have Trash and his mafiya been

"forgetting", lying, obstructing for 2+ years,

if they are all innocent?

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1098360174669168645

:lol

[TSA]

djohn dreading that Mueller report :lol

poor fella refuses to discuss it and has already lost all hope in Mueller and the report isn’t even out yet :lol

[Chris]

poor fella

:lol

[Spurs Homer]

Lol

comrade tsa & comrade Qhris aiding and abetting the enemy and each other

[Chris]

FBI’s top lawyer believed Hillary Clinton should face charges, but was talked out of it



“I have reason to believe that you originally believed it was appropriate to charge Hillary Clinton with regard to violations of law — various laws, with regard to mishandling of classified information. Is that accurate?” Ratcliffe, a former federal prosecutor, asked Baker.

Baker paused to gain his lawyer’s permission to respond, and then answered, “Yes.”

He later explained why he came to that conclusion, and how his mind was changed:

“So, I had that belief initially after reviewing, you know, a large binder of her emails that had classified information in them,” he said. “And I discussed it internally with a number of different folks, and eventually became persuaded that charging her was not appropriate because we could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that — we, the government, could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that — she had the intent necessary to violate (the law).”

Asked when he was persuaded to change his mind, Baker said: “Pretty late in the process, because we were arguing about it, I think, up until the end.”

Baker made clear that he did not like the activity Clinton had engaged in: “My original belief after — well, after having conducted the investigation and towards the end of it, then sitting down and reading a binder of her materials — I thought that it was alarming, appalling, whatever words I said, and argued with others about why they thought she shouldn’t be charged.”

His boss, Comey, announced on July 5, 2016, that he would not recommend criminal charges. He did so without consulting the Department of Justice (DOJ), a decision the department’s inspector general (IG) later concluded was misguided and likely usurped the power of the attorney general to make prosecutorial decisions. Comey has said, in retrospect, he accepts that finding but took the actions he did because he thought “they were in the country's best interest.”

Baker acknowledged that during the weeks leading up to the announcement, Comey “would throw things out like that to get people to start talking and thinking about it and test his conclusions.”

Baker said that if he had been more convinced there was evidence that Clinton intended to violate the law, “I would have argued that vociferously with him (Comey) and maybe changed his view.”

He portrayed his former boss as someone who was open to changing his mind once he heard from his senior staff, even after drafting his announcement statement. "I think he would have been receptive to changing his view even after he wrote that thing," Baker said.

Baker’s account also shed light on revelations I first reported more than a year ago that the original draft of Comey’s announcement concluded Clinton had been “grossly negligent” in handling her classified emails. That is the term in espionage statutes for criminality, but the language later was softened.

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/430881-fbis-top-lawyer-believed-hillary-clinton-should-face-charges-but-was#.XG4Cf4YglNw.twitter

[Winehole23]

Guess he didn't have a firm feeling about that. He changed his mind.

[Winehole23]

...

[Spurs Homer]

Lol emails bad

treason ok

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1098396049910026240

What was Trill saying about boots on ground? :lol

[Winehole23]

:lmao

Coffee boy delusions of grandeur

[DarrinS]

:cry

1098390449029550080

[DarrinS]

Thoughts and prayers for resistance

:cry

[djohn2oo8]

impeachment crowd is going to be disappointed. imo this whole saga would have been a lot shorter if trump didn't fire comey because of the russia thing

im hard pressed to believe we're going to be seeing fresh indictments with the report around the corner
Mueller’s DC Grand Jury was just extended 6 months. This report will focus on obstruction. As it would be smart to first report on obstruction and then you tell the conspiracy story through indictments, just as Mueller has been doing.

[djohn2oo8]

Because, if you are investigating a conspiracy amongst a group of people, you aren’t going to report that and tip them all off. Also, there is no mandate for Mueller to shut down after his report :)

[boutons_deux]

‘There’s abundant evidence that Donald Trump has committed crimes in office’: Trump biographer

The Trump biographer took it a step further, saying: “I believe, wittingly or not, that he is a Kremlin agent….we actually have a Kremlin agent in White House.”

“When the day comes that he’s not president,” Johnston continued,

“he must be indicted and convicted by a jury and imprisoned,

otherwise he will do, on steroids, what he did during the 2016 campaign….

call [on] people to commit acts of violence…

argue that the US government is not legitimate,

that law enforcement/intelligence agencies are not legitimate

because they don’t see the world the way Donald Trump thinks it ought to be.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/02/theres-abundant-evidence-donald-trump-committed-crimes-office-trump-biographer/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

[TSA]

Mueller’s DC Grand Jury was just extended 6 months. This report will focus on obstruction. As it would be smart to first report on obstruction and then you tell the conspiracy story through indictments, just as Mueller has been doing.

1098369147631816709

1098370786048516097

:lmao

[TSA]

Because, if you are investigating a conspiracy amongst a group of people, you aren’t going to report that and tip them all off. Also, there is no mandate for Mueller to shut down after his report :)

:lmao Mueller’s investigation is a big secret no one is aware of

[Winehole23]

:lmao Mueller’s investigation is a big secret no one is aware ofdjohn does have a reasonable point: grand jury stuff is (supposed to be) totally secret until there's a true bill or no bill.

[boutons_deux]

Maddow walks through the shocking degree to which the Obama administration went to protect evidence against Russia

Maddow reminded how the Obama administration

ejected 35 suspected Russian intelligence operatives,

seized two Russian “big, luxury compounds” and

announced new sanctions.

Obama also ordered U.S. intelligence agencies to produce a report on what actions Russia took to interfere in the 2016 election.

Maddow noted how U.S. intelligence agencies sought to “preserve the intelligence” about Russian meddling — and contacts with Trump associates — by spreading the information widely through government.

She noted America’s allies also did the same.

there was this scramble to make sure

the intelligence collected on the Russian attack and

specifically on contacts between the Trump campaign and the Russians during the attack,

that intelligence, they scrambled to make sure it could not be disappeared,”

“They scrambled to make sure it was basically memorialized and cataloged and recorded in such a way that it would leave traces,

that people would see it and

those efforts to preserve that intelligence carried on up until the final hours of the Obama administration,”

“There is a rush to leave tracks of the intel itself and the deep and unprecedented concern caused by that intelligence within the very top levels of the administration.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/02/maddow-walks-shocking-degree-obama-administration-went-protect-evidence-russia/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

AND Mueller has ALL of it! :lol

[koriwhat]

What was the lie, tough guy?

who said i was a tough guy? yall just pussies!

btw, comey lied his ass off left and right then subsequent lies from there on. no need to go down the path of proving anything to you pav because you're a vortex of bs and fuck getting sucked into your bs any longer.

[koriwhat]

Lol

comrade tsa & comrade Qhris aiding and abetting the enemy and each other

you're just a lunatic and see the world with rose colored glasses. the world's gone mad and you're one of its loons.

[TarantinoRezDog]

you're just a lunatic and see the world with rose colored glasses. the world's gone mad and you're one of its loons.

Like your customers who come in to get scratched up by you? And the Big Dog BD24 still waiting to beat you into a pile of hair and calf tats.

[Spurs Homer]

you're just a lunatic and see the world with rose colored glasses. the world's gone mad and you're one of its loons.

Dude, don't even have me ask BD24 to wait an hour longer at the park until you show up to get your ass kicked!

[Spurs Homer]

Because, if you are investigating a conspiracy amongst a group of people, you aren’t going to report that and tip them all off. Also, there is no mandate for Mueller to shut down after his report :)


I'm not even buying that this report is about to be released soon -

The ONLY way - would be if Mueller decides to leave the sealed indictments sealed - but it would not really square with Mueller doing a less than complete job - so it doesn't fit either -

I don't believe he is at the end yet.

[TarantinoRezDog]

Dude, don't even have me ask BD24 to wait an hour longer at the park until you show up to get your ass kicked!

It's good that Koriwhat didn't show. BD ain't a joke. You ever see those Popeye cartoons where Popeye would punch something like a charging bull and the bull would turn into a pile of steaks? BD would hit Koriwhat so fuckin' hard, he'd turn into a puddle of ink.

[Pavlov]

who said i was a tough guy?You did.

Mexican Thunderdome.

McAllister Park.


Etc.


btw, comey lied his ass off left and right then subsequent lies from there on. no need to go down the path of proving anything to you pav because you're a vortex of bs and fuck getting sucked into your bs any longer.You didn't answer the question, tough guy.

What did he lie about?

[Chucho]

I'm not even buying that this report is about to be released soon -

The ONLY way - would be if Mueller decides to leave the sealed indictments sealed - but it would not really square with Mueller doing a less than complete job - so it doesn't fit either -

I don't believe he is at the end yet.

LOL. "believe" equates to "praying like a motherfucker" and "willing to suck a massive volume of dick".


Regardless, I'd bet wooden nickels to dollars you're willing to suck a massive volume of dick at the drop of a hat.

[Winehole23]

I'd bet wooden nickels to dollars there will be zero sealed indictments against DJT.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1098432961081425920

Just like I've been saying all along. This is actually old news for me, but incredibly relevant.

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1098432961081425920

Just like I've been saying all along. This is actually old news for me, but incredibly relevant.:lol No it's not. Flynn pleaded guilty.

[Spurs Homer]

LOL. "believe" equates to "praying like a motherfucker" and "willing to suck a massive volume of dick".


Regardless, I'd bet wooden nickels to dollars you're willing to suck a massive volume of dick at the drop of a hat.

lol psuedo native american defending white supremacy - and now voicing out his gay fantasies!

[boutons_deux]

Pootin excluded, but there's plenty of other shit about Trash

Cohen’s Public Testimony Will Destroy Trump and Has Him Terrified

Cohen (https://www.politicususa.com/2019/02/19/michael-cohen-soon-will-reveal-chilling-details-about-trump-attorney.html) will be on live television destroying Donald Trump as he reveals previously secret information about Trump’s sexual infidelities and crooked business practices.

Cohen will be testifying publicly before BOTH the House Oversight Committee next Wednesday, AND privately before the House Intelligence Committee (https://www.politicususa.com/2019/01/28/adam-schiff-trump-organized-crime.html)next Thursday

Pelosi has sent a strong and clear message to Donald Trump that if he tries to make any more threats against Cohen’s family, she will make Trump pay for it.

Cohen will be expected to discuss a wide range of topics touching on the president. They include (as described by Cummings):



the President’s debts and payments relating to efforts to influence the 2016 election
the President’s compliance with financial disclosure requirements
the President’s compliance with campaign finance laws
the President’s compliance with tax laws;
the President’s potential and actual conflicts of interest
the President’s business practices
the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C
the accuracy of the President’s public statements
potentially fraudulent or inappropriate practices by the Trump Foundation
public efforts by the President and his attorney to intimidate Mr. Cohen or others not to testify

​

https://www.politicususa.com/2019/02/21/cohens-public-testimony-will-destroy-trump-and-has-him-terrified.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29

[Winehole23]

I hope Cohen has good bodyguards.

[Winehole23]

1098603196124184577

[Chucho]

lol psuedo native american defending white supremacy - and now voicing out his gay fantasies!

LOL RandomGay.

[TSA]

1098317595785220096

[Trill Clinton]

lol psuedo native american defending white supremacy - and now voicing out his gay fantasies!

Lmao

[Pavlov]

1098317595785220096
Why did they all lie about their contacts with Russians?

[Spurs Homer]

1098317595785220096

it means no one including your cult leader is above the law

[boutons_deux]

Sessions "forgot" 100+ times in Congress

Sessions is as compromised by Pootin as any of them.

[TSA]

Sessions "forgot" 100+ times in Congress

Sessions is as compromised by Pootin as any of them.

1071796245205827584

Who is Comey compromised by?

[TSA]

Why did they all lie about their contacts with Russians?

I don't know why don't you ask them.

[Pavlov]

1071796245205827584

Who is Comey compromised by?Classic *ding*ism.

Why did they all lie about their contacts with Russians?

[Pavlov]

I don't know why don't you ask them.That's what the FBI is for, genius.

:rollin

[TSA]

1098667206550974471

refresher

The media is ignoring ties between the Clinton campaign and Russians

While the media is filled with stories and theories about Trump’s interactions — or lack thereof — with Russia, not enough attention is being paid to revelations about pro-Hillary Clinton operatives’ use of opposition research that ostensibly came from Russia. With the Democrats unable to govern and lacking much of an affirmative agenda, they want Russia to be the story. Yet with each passing day, more seems to be revealed that not only undercuts the absolute faith Democrats have in the Trump-Russia collusion narrative but also demonstrates just how much they did and how far they were willing to go to establish an improper or embarrassing link between Trump and Russia.

There is no better illustration of this than what we now know went on between Clinton allies Sidney Blumenthal and Jonathan Winer and the author of the infamous dossier, Christopher Steele. We know that Steele was paid with Clinton campaign money and that he was “passionate about [Trump] not being president.” We know that Winer, an old Washington hand and former John Kerry staffer was Steele’s man at the State Department and, incredibly, admitted to distributing more than 100 of Steele’s commercial business documents within senior offices at the State Department. Soon enough, we will know who Steele’s clients were that paid for their views to be disseminated within the Obama administration and what Russian interests were involved. And by the way, it turns out Blumenthal, a long-time specialist in the political dark arts, had his own anti-Trump dossier, authored by political activist Cody Shearer, which he gave to Winer; Winer passed it to Steele, and Steele passed it to the FBI. Presto. Keeping someone between the political operatives and the FBI: That’s how real pros do it in the swamp.

Anyway, you would think this operation would warrant appropriate news coverage and multiple follow-up questions from the mainstream media. But instead, it is mostly crickets. Compare the coverage of the Blumenthal-Steele-Winer troika and their work to influence the FBI and supply anti-Trump campaign dirt to the media with the coverage of a single meeting that took place with a Russian lawyer and Trump campaign personnel. Ask yourself which is most significant: Donald Trump Jr. — the hapless, amateur son of then-candidate Trump — having a one-off, stray meeting in June 2016 with a Russian lawyer who perhaps promised, but did not deliver, compromising information on Clinton, or Winer, Blumenthal and foreign national Steele all playing a role in getting campaign dirt through Steele’s and State Department channels into the hands of the FBI? With all the breathless scrutiny surrounding Trump Jr.’s meeting, one would think there would at least be a modicum of interest in Blumenthal, Winer and Steele.

The idea that the Democrats were the ones who solicited and utilized Russian-supplied, damning information about Trump instead of Trump using Russian-supplied, damning information about Clinton is something that Trump’s opponents cannot process. So, today, when the Democrats and their allies in the media insist that we need to know what the Russians did to influence the election and interfere in the democratic process, it is fair to ask which Russians are they talking about? Are they talking about the Russians who were solicited by Steele and his Democrat paymasters? What were the Russians’ interests and were any of them paying Steele? (A new story links Steele to Putin ally Oleg Deripaska.) And what about the sources that Shearer solicited for the anti-Trump dossier he gave to Blumenthal? It seems that there were a lot more meetings with Russians and information collected from Russians on behalf of the Clinton campaign than there ever was on behalf of the Trump campaign.

It may be difficult for Democrats to accept this, but their outrage towards the president doesn’t change the fact that neither he nor his campaign colluded with the Russians. And it must be difficult knowing that more evidence or downright admissions keep surfacing pointing to Democrats facilitating Russian influence in the 2016 campaign. Russian fingerprints are all over the work of Blumenthal, Winer and Steele. Exploring their actions must be a priority for the media.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2018/02/13/the-media-is-ignoring-ties-between-the-clinton-campaign-and-russians/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.1531f4e7e64e

[TSA]

That's what the FBI is for, genius.

:rollin

So why are you asking me?

[Pavlov]

So why are you asking me?You're the one bitching about the FBI's investigations, genius.:rollin

[boutons_deux]

Ed Rogers ...

"a political consultant and a veteran of the Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush White Houses :lol

and several national campaigns. He is the chairman of the lobbying and communications firm

BGR Group, which he founded with former Mississippi governor Haley Barbour :lol in 1991.
"

:lol

Another Repug asshole going down with the Trash and his mafiya.

I love how these assholes talk EXCLUSIVELY about LYIN/ Trash's collusion, as if NOTHING else mattered.

If Trash is innocent, why did Trash dictate a lie about "adoptions / dirt on Hillary" meeting? etc, etc, etc.

[TSA]

You're the one bitching about the FBI's investigations, genius.:rollin

How does posting a tweet = bitching?

[Pavlov]

How does posting a tweet = bitching?You have been bitching about FBI investigations for three years, TSA.

Why are you trying to deny it now?:rollin

[Chris]

You have been bitching about FBI investigations for three years, TSA.

Why are you trying to deny it now?:rollin

Are you excited about going back to your Chumpdumper alias once the investigation is over? I'm hearing Mueller is almost ready to wrap it up.

[Pavlov]

Are you excited about going back to your Chumpdumper alias once the investigation is over? I'm hearing Mueller is almost ready to wrap it up.As soon as the report is released to the public, yes. Then everyone can call scoreboard.

[TSA]

You have been bitching about FBI investigations for three years, TSA.

Why are you trying to deny it now?:rollin

I asked you a simple question. How does posting a tweet = bitching? Or are you going to now walk that back and say you weren't referencing that post you quoted that started all of this?

[TSA]

As soon as the report is released to the public, yes. Then everyone can call scoreboard.

:lol your online life

[TSA]

Classic *ding*ism.



Jedi level *ding*

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/cf

[spurraider21]

:lol your online life
from the guy who had to banish one of his other accounts and has a "wrong about pizzagate" tagline as a result of an internet bet thinking other people take internets too seriously?

[Pavlov]

I asked you a simple question. How does posting a tweet = bitching? Or are you going to now walk that back and say you weren't referencing that post you quoted that started all of this?I'm saying flat out that you have been bitching about the FBI investigations for three years. I definitely assumed your McCabe tweet was doing the same.

About that specific McCabe tweet -- let's find out why you posted it.

Why did you post it?

Let's discuss it in great detail to show your support for the FBI investigations.

[Pavlov]

:lol your online lifeYou fell for Cat Stevens mind control and you're a father.

That's real-life frightening.

[TSA]

from the guy who had to banish one of his other accounts and has a "wrong about pizzagate" tagline as a result of an internet bet thinking other people take internets too seriously?

yes coming from the guy who obviously doesn't give a shit about putting a tagline under his name for an internet bet.

[TSA]

You fell for Cat Stevens mind control and you're a father.

That's real-life frightening.

I at least have time be a father.

[TSA]

I'm saying flat out that you have been bitching about the FBI investigations for three years. I definitely assumed your McCabe tweet was doing the same.

About that specific McCabe tweet -- let's find out why you posted it.

Why did you post it?

Let's discuss it in great detail to show your support for the FBI investigations.

I posted it to show how paranoid McCabe was. And I fully support the FBI/DOJ investigation into McCabe.

[Pavlov]

I at least have time be a father.I have quite a bit of time for everything tbh.

:lol Cat Stevens mind control

[Pavlov]

I posted it to show how paranoid McCabe was. And I fully support the FBI/DOJ investigation into McCabe.Do you fully support the FBI investigations into the Trump campaign and the resulting SCO investigation?

Yes or no.

[TSA]

I have quite a bit of time for everything tbh.

:lol Cat Stevens mind control

No one that spends as much time as you do online has time to be a father, or at least be a good father.

[Chris]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dz9I0vXUcAAdnui.jpg:large

[TSA]

Do you fully support the FBI investigations into the Trump campaign and the resulting SCO investigation?

Yes or no.

I support the current FBI investigations into the Trump campaign and have always supported the SCO investigation. I did not support the FBI investigations when Comey/McCabe/Strzok were running them.

[Pavlov]

I support the current FBI investigations into the Trump campaign and have always supported the SCO investigation. I did not support the FBI investigations when Comey/McCabe/Strzok were running them.:lmao what a load of bullshit!

The correct answer is no. you do not fully support the FBI investigations into the Trump campaign and the resulting SCO investigation.