View Full Version : Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
Spurtacular
01-02-2018, 10:29 PM
Pavlov Let's look at all the damning details you wanted to sperm shield against in your stupid laugh at the guy who wrote it cuckoldry.
* Paul Combetta -- the Platte River Networks technician who used the “BleachBit” program to destroy thousands of Hillary Clinton’s emails when they were under congressional subpoena and preservation orders
* No, I’m not suggesting that DOJ direct the FBI to break into Mr. Combetta’s home with guns drawn in the dead of night, as Mueller did with former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. I’d save the brass-knuckles tactics for hardened criminals, as the law intends. I’m talking about the aggressive but wholly legitimate step Mueller has taken: Calling BS on attempts by criminal suspects to use lawyers to conceal their schemes..... Back in November, we catalogued the stark contrasts between Mueller’s brand of hardball and the kid-gloves treatment given to subjects of the Clinton-emails investigation.
* Naturally, the defense attempted to rely on the attorney–client privilege to shield communications between the lawyer and the suspects from disclosure. But Mueller successfully countered that, under the crime-fraud exception to that privilege, communications are not deemed confidential if they are in furtherance of a crime, fraud, or civil wrong — which includes a scheme to dupe the government or undermine an investigation....
Of course, in the Clinton probe — which Attorney General Loretta Lynch instructed FBI director James Comey to refer to as a “matter,” lest anyone get the impression the Federal Bureau of Investigation was doing, you know, an investigation — the Obama Justice Department resisted using the grand jury at all, let alone using it to pry information from lawyers. But hyping the attorney–client privilege into an impregnable barrier was the key to whitewashing the case: Witnesses couldn’t be questioned about the process of reviewing Clinton’s emails and destroying tens of thousands of them, about Clinton’s transferring to them classified emails that they lacked necessary clearances to possess, about their storage of classified emails on their private laptops, and so on — all because they were lawyers and such questioning would purportedly violate the attorney–client privilege.
* It was unmitigated nonsense, but very useful nonsense. It enabled the Obama Justice Department to feign the appearance of a thoroughgoing inquiry: No, no, the fix wasn’t in; they tried really hard to make the case but, gee whiz, they ran into some legal restrictions that just couldn’t be overcome.
* Mueller, to the contrary, is not merely going through the motions. He is doing what the Justice Department usually does: working hard to make the case and knocking over phony roadblocks placed in his path. When the defense says, “attorney–client privilege,” Mueller responds, “Tell it to the judge.” They lose, as he knew they would; then he marches the lawyer in to the grand jury, gets the testimony, and indicts the clients.
Reading is essential.
It doesn't matter what you think of them. It's what they said and are under oath about what's important.
And the fact republicans dont want the public to see.
:lol 21 Hours of testimony under oath
:lol Laying down the foundation of the dossier, how they crafted it, etc
:lol Pointing them on the right path to investigate Trump/Deutche Bank connection
:lol Instead republicans look into Fusion GPS Deutche Bank account
:lol Find nothing in there
:lol Republicans "investigators"
:lol TSA Finds more credibility in Trump's tweets than actual people who know what they're talking about
:lol I have a nuclear button to push too
:lol TSA impressed by a madman
:lol Your life
Does Glenn Simpson mention meeting Bruce Ohr and hiring his wife to work for Fusion GPS yes or no?
djohn2oo8
01-02-2018, 10:41 PM
Lordy! Pisser getting two pieced.
Does Glenn Simpson mention meeting Bruce Ohr and hiring his wife to work for Fusion GPS yes or no?
Dont know. But we would find out if the person or persons responsible for withholding the transcripts of these hearings actually release them.
Dont know. But we would find out if the person or persons responsible for withholding the transcripts of these hearings actually release them.
You posted his op-ed how do you not know if he mentioned that?
Lordy! Pisser getting two pieced.
ddodge2oo8
Let’s bet accounts again on who funded the Steele dossier. Do you accept yes or no?
You posted his op-ed how do you not know if he mentioned that?
Because there is no mention of it in there?
But since this is an important issue for you, it works for both of us to have the transcripts out so we can read why he had his wife working for his firm. It's a valid question.
Maybe read this before embarrassing yourself further.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/02/opinion/republicans-investigation-fusion-gps.html?_r=0
Truth bombs. Republicans "investigators" refuse to release transcripts. Only selectively leaking what suits them.
It's that whole context thing your kind is not so fond of.
:lol truth bombs
“Finally, we debunked the biggest canard being pushed by the president’s men — the notion that we somehow knew of the June 9, 2016, meeting in Trump Tower between some Russians and the Trump brain trust.”
Glenn Simpson met with Natalia Veselnitskaya hours before the meeting with Trump Jr. and then Simpson met with her after the meeting.
Pop quiz Reck. How many of this op-ed’s authors pled the 5th?
:lol truth bombs
“Finally, we debunked the biggest canard being pushed by the president’s men — the notion that we somehow knew of the June 9, 2016, meeting in Trump Tower between some Russians and the Trump brain trust.”
Glenn Simpson met with Natalia Veselnitskaya hours before the meeting with Trump Jr. and then Simpson met with her after the meeting.
Pop quiz Reck. How many of this op-ed’s authors pled the 5th?
How do you know he met with the Russian chick hours before? That seems like privilege info and first hand accounts only select people would be in the know of. How are you one of these people?
There is a lot we can learn via the transcripts. Just like we would learn the full scope of the Storkz and Page's texts in full. Just saying.
Spurtacular
01-03-2018, 01:07 AM
Reck
Pop quiz Reck. How many of this op-ed’s authors pled the 5th?
Reck (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14412)
Pop quiz Reck. How many of this op-ed’s authors pled the 5th?
Haven't you been reading? If the said transcripts are released, we would 100% know the answer to that question.
But I can guess and say, not a lot since they provided a lot of information about the dossier and their own financial statements.
Hey since TSA and Spurtacular are so curious about info that should already be in the hearing they were in, please contact your congressmen and ask for the release of the transcripts.
948414296731668480
How do you know he met with the Russian chick hours before? That seems like privilege info and first hand accounts only select people would be in the know of. How are you one of these people?
There is a lot we can learn via the transcripts. Just like we would learn the full scope of the Storkz and Page's texts in full. Just saying.
But hours before the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Fusion co-founder and ex-Wall Street Journal reporter Glenn Simpson was with Veselnitskaya in a Manhattan federal courtroom, a confidential source told Fox News. Court records reviewed by Fox News, email correspondence and published reports corroborate the pair’s presence together. The source told Fox News they also were together after the Trump Tower meeting.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/11/07/fusion-gps-official-met-with-russian-operative-before-and-after-trump-jr-sit-down.html
Haven't you been reading? If the said transcripts are released, we would 100% know the answer to that question.
But I can guess and say, not a lot since they provided a lot of information about the dossier and their own financial statements.
Instead of guessing type into google each of the op-ed authors names and pled the 5th. Post your results here.
But hours before the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Fusion co-founder and ex-Wall Street Journal reporter Glenn Simpson was with Veselnitskaya in a Manhattan federal courtroom, a confidential source told Fox News. Court records reviewed by Fox News, email correspondence and published reports corroborate the pair’s presence together. The source told Fox News they also were together after the Trump Tower meeting.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/11/07/fusion-gps-official-met-with-russian-operative-before-and-after-trump-jr-sit-down.html
You're gonna have to do better than Fox News. Trump state TV and all.
Hey since TSA and Spurtacular are so curious about info that should already be in the hearing they were in, please contact your congressmen and ask for the release of the transcripts.
948414296731668480
No need to write, my congressman Adam Schiff will just leak them.
You're gonna have to do better than Fox News. Trump state TV and all.
You are free to review the court records yourself.
Spurtacular
01-03-2018, 01:25 AM
Hey since TSA (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=7640) and Spurtacular (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=49615) are so curious about info that should already be in the hearing they were in, please contact your congressmen and ask for the release of the transcripts.
948414296731668480
I'm not interested in this nothing burger though; I'd much rather pursue the business of the people.
DarrinS
01-03-2018, 07:56 AM
948382178345390080
Like my nig Reck just posted
I clicked on that, expecting full transcripts. Disappointed, tbh.
DarrinS
01-03-2018, 08:06 AM
Evidently, reports by NYT, WAPO, and CNN in spring 2017, are now right wing conspiracies. :lol
RandomGuy
01-03-2018, 08:57 AM
Your theory is shit. I’m glad you won’t be spamming it anymore.
My prediction came true. Rather than post a military analysis of the Ukranian arms sales, you wish that a theory you don't like would go away, because you find its conclusions inconvenient for your worldview.
(slow clap)
RandomGuy
01-03-2018, 08:58 AM
Let’s bet accounts again on who funded the Steele dossier. Do you accept yes or no?
Irrelevant.
Circumstantial ad hominem. Look it up.
RandomGuy
01-03-2018, 09:00 AM
Your theory is shit. I’m glad you won’t be spamming it anymore.
I generally agree Russia's efforts had little overall effect, but it wasn't for a lack of trying. The question is, whether we should put up with active efforts of an intelligence agency of a foreign government to attack the very idea of democracy itself. Western liberal democracy is under threat from authoritarian regimes. That is important.
There is also the matter that the sitting president appears to be actively compromised by that same government.
But then, predicting what Trump will, or won't do is sort of a mugs game. He never fails to do the stupidest shit possible, just when you think he can't be dumber.
The thing about a good theory though, it that it both explains facts, and you can make testable predictions.
Fact 1:
Russia attempted to hack our electoral process through a multi-pronged attack.
Fact 2:
Donald "look how big my inauguration crowd was" Trump has done nothing but deny this even happened, and has gone so far as to take the extraordinary effort to delegitimize his own intelligence services when they something did happen. He has shown no willingness whatsoever to hold Russia to account for anything.
Fact 3:
Donald Trump has a pattern of criticizing anyone, and everyone at the drop of a hat. Allies, enemies, courts, free press, nothing has escaped his remarks and twitter feed, except for ONE/(two) thing(s), and that is Russia/Putin
Fact 4:
Russian efforts appeared designed to support Trump
Fact 5:
Trump directly called on Russia publicly to support his efforts to get elected.
Fact 6:
Donald Trump has gone out of his way to meet and talk with Putin privately in person, with no American witnesses. This is the only leader with which he has acted in this manner.
Fact 7:
Donald Trump, when forced to sign a bipartisan sanctions bill passed with a veto-proof majority of both houses of Congress, issued a signing statement saying most of it was unconstitutional, and that his administration would enforce it as little as possible.
Fact 8:
when Russia retaliated against sanctions by forcing the US embassy to cut staff, Trump thanked Putin for the action, making him look weak, something he has said one should never do, and is inconsistent with his past behavior in any other regard.
Theory:
Donald Trump has been compromised in some way. Either he directly owes them money, or they have evidence of some kind of him breaking the law or doing something he does not want others to know about.
This theory explains those facts, and is fully consistent with observed reality.
Prediction:
Donald Trump will take no action personally, nor will he criticize Russia or Putin in any way in regards to the Russian attack on our elections. He may allow his underlings to do some minor, inconsequential stuff, and if forced to do anything by Congress will drag his feet, if not outright attempt to veto any sanctions.
The way to falsify the theory:
1) Trump criticizes Putin/Russia (good)
2) Trump orders/takes action that materially harms Russian interests (definitive)
Bullshit conspiracy theories fail very often because either: they cannot be falsified, or they directly conflict with observed reality. This theory can be falsified, and does not conflict with what we know as fact.
Donald Trump is unpredictable except for Russia.
xylophone
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 09:30 AM
948549653833961473
Lordy!
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 09:34 AM
I clicked on that, expecting full transcripts. Disappointed, tbh.
So you expect them to release information that was testified to under oath and behind closed doors? Congress has the power to do that. Why haven't they?
Trill Clinton
01-03-2018, 09:51 AM
948549653833961473
Lordy!
so this is why lord dotard went into a tweet storm yesterday?
Trill Clinton
01-03-2018, 09:54 AM
Bannon remarked mockingly: “The three senior guys in the campaign thought it was a good idea to meet with a foreign government inside Trump Tower in the conference room on the 25th floor – with no lawyers. They didn’t have any lawyers.
“Even if you thought that this was not treasonous, or unpatriotic, or bad shit, and I happen to think it’s all of that, you should have called the FBI immediately.”
Bannon went on, Wolffe writes, to say that if any such meeting had to take place, it should have been set up “in a Holiday Inn in Manchester, New Hampshire, with your lawyers who meet with these people”. Any information, he said, could then be “dump[ed] … down to Breitbart or something like that, or maybe some other more legitimate publication”.
Bannon added: “You never see it, you never know it, because you don’t need to … But that’s the brain trust that they had.”
“You realise where this is going,” he is quoted as saying. “This is all about money laundering. Mueller chose [senior prosecutor Andrew] Weissmann first and he is a money-laundering guy. Their path to fucking Trump goes right through Paul Manafort, Don Jr and Jared Kushner … It’s as plain as a hair on your face.”
Last month it was reported that federal prosecutors had subpoenaed records from Deutsche Bank, the German financial institution that has lent hundreds of millions of dollars to the Kushner property empire. Bannon continues: “It goes through Deutsche Bank and all the Kushner shit. The Kushner shit is greasy. They’re going to go right through that. They’re going to roll those two guys up and say play me or trade me.”
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 10:03 AM
so this is why lord dotard went into a tweet storm yesterday?
He went into a rant about the NYT article on Fusion and the dossier.
RandomGuy
01-03-2018, 10:24 AM
Bannon remarked mockingly: “The three senior guys in the campaign thought it was a good idea to meet with a foreign government inside Trump Tower in the conference room on the 25th floor – with no lawyers. They didn’t have any lawyers.
“Even if you thought that this was not treasonous, or unpatriotic, or bad shit, and I happen to think it’s all of that, you should have called the FBI immediately.”
Bannon went on, Wolff writes, to say that if any such meeting had to take place, it should have been set up “in a Holiday Inn in Manchester, New Hampshire, with your lawyers who meet with these people”. Any information, he said, could then be “dump[ed] … down to Breitbart or something like that, or maybe some other more legitimate publication”.
Bannon added: “You never see it, you never know it, because you don’t need to … But that’s the brain trust that they had.”
I.... agree... with... Bannon :smchode:
RandomGuy
01-03-2018, 10:25 AM
Bannon remarked mockingly: “The three senior guys in the campaign thought it was a good idea to meet with a foreign government inside Trump Tower in the conference room on the 25th floor – with no lawyers. They didn’t have any lawyers.
“Even if you thought that this was not treasonous, or unpatriotic, or bad shit, and I happen to think it’s all of that, you should have called the FBI immediately.”
Bannon went on, Wolffe writes, to say that if any such meeting had to take place, it should have been set up “in a Holiday Inn in Manchester, New Hampshire, with your lawyers who meet with these people”. Any information, he said, could then be “dump[ed] … down to Breitbart or something like that, or maybe some other more legitimate publication”.
Bannon added: “You never see it, you never know it, because you don’t need to … But that’s the brain trust that they had.”
“You realise where this is going,” he is quoted as saying. “This is all about money laundering. Mueller chose [senior prosecutor Andrew] Weissmann first and he is a money-laundering guy. Their path to fucking Trump goes right through Paul Manafort, Don Jr and Jared Kushner … It’s as plain as a hair on your face.”
Last month it was reported that federal prosecutors had subpoenaed records from Deutsche Bank, the German financial institution that has lent hundreds of millions of dollars to the Kushner property empire. Bannon continues: “It goes through Deutsche Bank and all the Kushner shit. The Kushner shit is greasy. They’re going to go right through that. They’re going to roll those two guys up and say play me or trade me.”
Dammit. You beat me to it.
Spurminator
01-03-2018, 10:26 AM
Bannon: "Here's how I would've committed treason if it had been me..."
dabom
01-03-2018, 10:31 AM
Repugs trying to figure out how to respond to this one. :lmao
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 10:32 AM
948572747474657280
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 10:38 AM
Repugs trying to figure out how to respond to this one. :lmao
Guess they won't be supporting Bannon anymore
FlAVaK
01-03-2018, 10:40 AM
Scorning apparent White House insouciance, Bannon reaches for a hurricane metaphor: “They’re sitting on a beach trying to stop a Category Five.”
Trump is not spared. Wolff writes that Thomas Barrack Jr, a billionaire who is one of the president’s oldest associates, allegedly told a friend: “He’s not only crazy, he’s stupid.”
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 10:44 AM
so this is why lord dotard went into a tweet storm yesterday?
Im sure though he knew this was coming and had a complete meltdown.
DarrinS
01-03-2018, 10:44 AM
948572747474657280
Schindler
Trill Clinton
01-03-2018, 10:46 AM
Repugs trying to figure out how to respond to this one. :lmao
http://i68.tinypic.com/11jratv.jpg
http://i64.tinypic.com/1zv4m7p.jpg
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 10:49 AM
Schindler
948577322671706112
Schindler!!
DarrinS
01-03-2018, 10:50 AM
Bannon good now
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 10:51 AM
Bannon good now
Lordy Darrin is mad!
IronMexican
01-03-2018, 10:54 AM
Lordy Darrin is mad!
Harden thread
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 10:55 AM
Harden thread
Dodgers thread. lordy!
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 11:16 AM
948569993528176640
Knives coming out lordy!
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 11:18 AM
948549653833961473
Lordy!
948569993528176640
Knives coming out lordy!
https://thumbs.gfycat.com/LastingQuestionableCamel-size_restricted.gif
dabom
01-03-2018, 11:28 AM
https://thumbs.gfycat.com/LastingQuestionableCamel-size_restricted.gif
This is probably the best use of this gif ever. :lol
RandomGuy
01-03-2018, 11:39 AM
This is probably the best use of this gif ever. :lol
Making me want some actual popcorn. Should have eaten breakfast...
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 12:03 PM
948593449695096832
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 12:04 PM
948593449695096832
https://media1.tenor.com/images/a6c0d89f503a5d4796c890a770311093/tenor.gif?itemid=6233544
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 12:09 PM
June 2016. Still. :lol Bannon going scorched Earth
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 12:20 PM
948595594729271296
Lordy!
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 12:32 PM
948599979068837888
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 12:36 PM
948605234175270912
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 12:50 PM
948610432981446658
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 12:51 PM
948610432981446658
https://thumbs.gfycat.com/ArcticMarvelousHamadryas-max-1mb.gif
https://78.media.tumblr.com/ed25a0e148274ed179adc20ec0e390e3/tumblr_nkceiwg6GC1qdrcyyo1_500.gif
DarrinS
01-03-2018, 01:01 PM
Well, I guess we saw this coming.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/08/steve-bannon-readies-his-revenge
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 01:11 PM
948608768681574400
Lol Bannon rattin out everybody.
Bannon good now
And Clapper bad now. George Papadopoulos who?
XiYwqHxos_g
Green Man
01-03-2018, 01:17 PM
As fun as it is to see, this is Bannon’s last gasp desperation move to stay relevant. Backing Moore really backfired and turning on Trump is his only play.
spurraider21
01-03-2018, 01:19 PM
Evidently, reports by NYT, WAPO, and CNN in spring 2017, are now right wing conspiracies. :lol
no, they're just being fed selective info (hand-picked texts) and are reporting on them. garbage in, garbage out
The OIG report is going to be brutal. Top FBI/DOJ rats already scurrying from the dossier as fast as they can.
======
It’s every man and woman for themselves as the collective groups of architects behind the entire FBI Counterintelligence Operation, that brought us the 18-month-long ‘vast Russian conspiracy’ narrative, now attempt to back-track from all previous assertions.
Two days ago we shared very strong confidence the joint FBI (counterintelligence) and DOJ (National Security Division) scheme was going to come out. The reason is simple, they left too big a trail of factual and provable evidence of their activity.
It is not coincidental that just as scrutiny over the 2016 FBI FISA court application gains traction in congress and media, the insider intelligence community started leaking to the New York Times about the insignificance of the Steele Dossier as it relates to the FISA court application. Look, over there, it was George Papadopoulos; not the DOJ FISA construct that was used by the FBI to launch surveillance upon candidate Trump. Swear.
Laughable.
Predictable.
For more than a year the Steele Dossier was the most valuable evidence to the Russian narrative; then, poof, in the blink-of-an-eye, not so much – it became a risk. Funny that. The transparency of motive is brutally obvious, too many FBI and DOJ people at risk now. The trail is too easy to follow.
It was only a matter of time before Fusion-GPS spoke up toward the same goal of track-covering. Yesterday Glenn Simpson and Peter Fritsch [Hi Glenn] posted an Op-Ed in the New York Times attempting further distance.
According to Glenn and Pete:
[…] “We don’t believe the Steele dossier was the trigger for the F.B.I.’s investigation into Russian meddling. As we told the Senate Judiciary Committee in August, our sources said the dossier was taken so seriously because it corroborated reports the bureau had received from other sources, including one inside the Trump camp.” (more)
Additionally, Fusion GPS also claims they never spoke to the FBI: “We did not speak to the F.B.I. and haven’t since.”, which is bizarre given the previous reports of Glenn Simpson talking to FBI Counterintelligence Agent Peter Strzok. Isn’t Peter Strzok in the FBI?
Conspicuously absent from the Fusion Op-Ed is any mention of Glenn Simpson’s wife, Mary B Jacoby, and her involvement therein. Additionally their explanations are devoid of the prior meeting or contact with DOJ Deputy Attorney Bruce Ohr, the guy who was demoted for meeting with them without telling anyone. Another curious missing detail is Simpson, Jacoby and Fritsch hiring Bruce Ohr’s wife Nellie Ohr to work on the “Trump project”.
Nope. Nothing to see here, move along, move along.
Unfortunately for Glenn and Pete the part about them saying the dossier was taken seriously because it corroborated reports the FBI had from another source, “including one inside the Trump camp”, leads to Business Insider asking questions about that source.
Who does that corroborative source turn out to be? Oh yeah:
[…] a person with knowledge of Fusion’s testimony and the op-ed told Business Insider on Tuesday. … it was a reference to George Papadopoulos. (link)
So the current narrative is: the FBI didn’t likely use the Steele Dossier in the FISA court application, but rather the FBI’s confirmation of a source within the Steele Dossier, as given by the author of the Dossier, was likely used in the FISA court application.
See how that works?
The “dossier” didn’t originate the FISA application to conduct surveillance on candidate Donald Trump; the source (Papadopoulos) quoted “inside the dossier” originated the FISA application. Let’s play a game; it’s called “Semantics”.
Except there’s another problem.
Stuff happens when people begin the ‘every-man-for-himself‘ routine; the central narrative control collapses.
Simultaneous to Fusions’ Op-Ed protestations, the former Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, appears on CNN to say, he never heard of George Papadopoulos – and he should know, because his office put out the 2016/2017 Joint Analysis Report. That’s the 17-agency (eyeroll) definitive story on all things ‘Muh Russian Conspiracy’.
So now what?
Not what, “who”?
Yeah, who?
Who’d he throw it to?
I dunno.
“Third Base.”
Fusion-GPS’s, Glenn Simpson, is playing Abbott to ODNI, James Clapper’s, Costello.
Why? Because the entire back-story that centers around the Steele Dossier, how it was assembled (Clinton Camp) and how it was used collaboratively by the DOJ (National Security Division) and FBI (Counterintelligence unit), is a case study in how to mislead a FISA court to gain an unlawful warrant to wiretap and conduct surveillance on political opponents.
And I remind you, that approach is what the former Obama head of the DOJ National Security Division, Asst. Attorney General John P Carlin, admitted to the FISA court weeks after the Trump wiretap and surveillance warrant was issued.
A newly released court order from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) found that the National Security Agency, under former President Obama, routinely violated American privacy protections while scouring through overseas intercepts and failed to disclose the extent of the problems until the final days before Donald Trump was elected president last fall. In describing the violations, the FISA court said the illegal searches conducted by the NSA under Obama were “widespread” and created a “very serious Fourth Amendment issue.” These new discoveries come from a recently unsealed FISA court document dated April 26, 2017 and center around a hearing dated October 26, 2017, just days before the 2016 election, in which the FISA court apparently learned for the first time of “widespread” and illegal spying on American citizens by the NSA under the Obama administration. (pdf link)
As the Inspector General investigation continues: ♦FBI Agent Peter Strzok has been reassigned to the HR department. ♦FBI Lawyer Lisa Page, personal legal aide to FBI Asst. Director, Andrew “Andy” McCabe, has been returned to the DOJ side. ♦FBI Chief Legal Counsel James Baker has been relieved of his duties by FBI Director Christopher Wray. ♦FBI Asst Director Andrew McCabe has announced his intent to retire in March.
All of these FBI personnel moves are a preliminary outcomes of the still ongoing Office of Inspector General (OIG) investigation. All of this has been reported. None of these moves are speculative. All of these geese are cooked. However, this is just one side of the 2016 political “Trump operation”, the FBI investigative Counterintelligence Division side.
The other side, the legal side of the Trump operation, stems from the National Security Division of the DOJ. A FISA application is submitted from the DOJ-NSD for use by the FBI Counterintelligence team. Sunlight upon this side of the collaboration is the reason for all of the current distraction narratives.
While both sides of the corrupt political apparatus participated in the illegal unmasking and leaking, the documentation and activity behind the origin of the FISA application is the current ‘hot potato’ no-one wants any association with.
The FISA application(s) and the subsequent wiretapping and surveillance collection, along with the unmasking that followed, is the focus of House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes.
Sometime this month, after the initial Inspector General Michael Horowitz release, House Judiciary Chair Bob Goodlatte and Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley will likely call for a Special Counsel to investigate the upper-level management of the FBI and DOJ.
We should support that approach. The SC can quickly put a Grand Jury together and start presenting the IG investigative evidence, as well as enforceable subpoenas for witnesses.
There’s a lot of different down-stream legal issues:
The unlawful exoneration of Hillary Clinton by political operatives in the DOJ/FBI.
The unlawful destruction of evidence; and the manipulation of investigative protocols to gain a specific and pre-planned political outcome. (Peter Strzok, Andrew McCabe)
The unlawful use of the FISA court for political spy operations by the DOJ/FBI.
The unlawful use of the Dept of Justice National Security Division. For weaponized political benefit. (Sally Yates, Loretta Lynch, Bruce Ohr)
The unlawful use of the FBI Counterintelligence Division. For weaponized political benefit. (James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, James Baker)
The unlawful use of a Special Counsel (Mueller) investigation to hide the conspiracy; (James Baker, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Bruce Ohr, Andrew Weissman, Jeannie Rhee, Aaron Zebley)
All of the origination details are part of the minutia that will surface in the next 30 days. Devin Nunes, Bob Goodlatte and Chuck Grassley using the Judiciary and Intelligence Committees to collect evidence and tell the public everything outlined HERE and more.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/03/fusion-gps-tries-and-fails-to-distance-themselves-from-fbi-fisa-origin/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 01:21 PM
As fun as it is to see, this is Bannon’s last gasp desperation move to stay relevant. Backing Moore really backfired and turning on Trump is his only play.
Imagine what Bannon told Mueller.
Brazil
01-03-2018, 01:21 PM
^ Idgaf tbh Bannon is a POS but if he can be part of trump being nuked I'm all in :lol
no, they're just being fed selective info (hand-picked texts) and are reporting on them. garbage in, garbage out
He said Spring of 2017...what hand picked texts are you referring to in the Spring of 2017 that NYT, WAPO, and CNN ran?
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 01:27 PM
^ Idgaf tbh Bannon is a POS but if he can be part of trump being nuked I'm all in :lol
948620881877721088
:lmao Lawd have mercy
spurraider21
01-03-2018, 01:28 PM
He said Spring of 2017...what hand picked texts are you referring to in the Spring of 2017 that NYT, WAPO, and CNN ran?
he didnt give much context to work with, but his post was right after that fusion oped thingy
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 01:29 PM
948620881877721088
:lmao Lawd have mercy
https://media.giphy.com/media/RHiD0K65NxxLO/giphy.gif
spurraider21
01-03-2018, 01:30 PM
948620881877721088
:lmao Lawd have mercy
:lol is that real?
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 01:32 PM
:lol is that real?
:lol yes
he didnt give much context to work with, but his post was right after that fusion oped thingy
Clearly said Spring 2017. So which texts in Spring 2017?
948567146279374849
Excellent thread. Democrats and Republicans should all be asking these same questions.
spurraider21
01-03-2018, 01:42 PM
Clearly said Spring 2017. So which texts in Spring 2017?
aight i was probably wrong there :lol... i still have no clue what reports he was talking about
spurraider21
01-03-2018, 01:43 PM
:lol Steve has nothing to do with my Presidency
:lol Steve does not represent my base
dabom
01-03-2018, 01:43 PM
948620881877721088
:lmao Lawd have mercy
:lmao :lmao
:lmao
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 01:44 PM
948624494192746496
Maybe read this before embarrassing yourself further.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/02/opinion/republicans-investigation-fusion-gps.html?_r=0
Truth bombs. Republicans "investigators" refuse to release transcripts. Only selectively leaking what suits them.
It's that whole context thing your kind is not so fond of.
:lol truth bombs
:lol release the transcripts
:lol Reck
But, a spokesman for one of those congressional panels is hitting back, saying that Simpson and Fusion’s lawyers have been anything but transparent.
“Despite his public statements, Mr. Simpson and his attorney demanded during the interview that the transcript be kept confidential,” Taylor Foy, a spokesman for the Senate Judiciary Committee, tells The Daily Caller.
http://amp.dailycaller.com/2018/01/03/senate-panel-hits-back-at-fusion-gps-over-op-ed-claims/
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 01:52 PM
:lol TSA pretending Bannon didn't just take a shit on his king.
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 01:53 PM
:lol TSA pretending Bannon didn't just take a shit on his king.
:lmao
spurraider21
01-03-2018, 01:55 PM
guys trump is just playing 8D Chess. bannon asked him to release that response for plausible deniability while bannon continues to war for him
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 01:56 PM
948626895322730501
:lol implosion
spurraider21
01-03-2018, 01:57 PM
so now steve bannon is fake news
monosylab1k
01-03-2018, 01:58 PM
:lol TSA pretending Bannon didn't just take a shit on his king.
:lmao
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 01:58 PM
Christ now Jr taking shots at Bannon :lmao
monosylab1k
01-03-2018, 01:58 PM
Imagine what Bannon told Mueller.
Lordy! :lol
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 01:58 PM
948626895322730501
:lol implosionDamn, she read quick, don't she?
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 01:59 PM
Christ now Jr taking shots at Bannon :lmao
948625872914931712
:rollin
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 02:01 PM
948628964351889409
lol
:lol TSA pretending Bannon didn't just take a shit on his king.
Bannon shit on everyone but Trump.
spurraider21
01-03-2018, 02:07 PM
Bannon shit on everyone but Trump.
i know man, these cucks just dont get it :lol
guys trump is just playing 8D Chess. bannon asked him to release that response for plausible deniability while bannon continues to war for him
spurraider21
01-03-2018, 02:08 PM
get your ass in here, Thread
last activity: 1 hour ago
RandomGuy
01-03-2018, 02:12 PM
:lol truth bombs
:lol release the transcripts
:lol Reck
But, a spokesman for one of those congressional panels is hitting back, saying that Simpson and Fusion’s lawyers have been anything but transparent.
“Despite his public statements, Mr. Simpson and his attorney demanded during the interview that the transcript be kept confidential,” Taylor Foy, a spokesman for the Senate Judiciary Committee, tells The Daily Caller.
http://amp.dailycaller.com/2018/01/03/senate-panel-hits-back-at-fusion-gps-over-op-ed-claims/
We don’t believe the Steele dossier was the trigger for the F.B.I.’s investigation into Russian meddling. As we told the Senate Judiciary Committee in August, our sources said the dossier was taken so seriously because it corroborated reports the bureau had received from other sources, including one inside the Trump camp.
The intelligence committees have known for months that credible allegations of collusion between the Trump camp and Russia were pouring in from independent sources during the campaign. Yet lawmakers in the thrall of the president continue to wage a cynical campaign to portray us as the unwitting victims of Kremlin disinformation.
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/01/02/opinion/republicans-investigation-fusion-gps.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
monosylab1k
01-03-2018, 02:12 PM
Bannon shit on everyone but Trump.
:lol
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 02:14 PM
Bannon shit on everyone but Trump.:lmao Dude said Trump was in on the adoption meeting.
So much denial when your king is involved.
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 02:22 PM
948632246524706823
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 02:24 PM
948632834000019457.
Panic.
Trill Clinton
01-03-2018, 02:26 PM
948627440913604609
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 02:27 PM
948627440913604609
:lmao that is some creepy shit. Bannon has got the juice on McConnell too.
Trill Clinton
01-03-2018, 02:30 PM
:lmao
948632009785700353
RandomGuy
01-03-2018, 02:30 PM
:lol truth bombs
:lol release the transcripts
:lol Reck
But, a spokesman for one of those congressional panels is hitting back, saying that Simpson and Fusion’s lawyers have been anything but transparent.
“Despite his public statements, Mr. Simpson and his attorney demanded during the interview that the transcript be kept confidential,” Taylor Foy, a spokesman for the Senate Judiciary Committee, tells The Daily Caller.
http://amp.dailycaller.com/2018/01/03/senate-panel-hits-back-at-fusion-gps-over-op-ed-claims/
We told Congress that from Manhattan to Sunny Isles Beach, Fla., and from Toronto to Panama, we found widespread evidence that Mr. Trump and his organization had worked with a wide array of dubious Russians in arrangements that often raised questions about money laundering. Likewise, those deals don’t seem to interest Congress.
Suck on that jizz-nugget.
RandomGuy
01-03-2018, 02:32 PM
Bannon good now
We told Congress that from Manhattan to Sunny Isles Beach, Fla., and from Toronto to Panama, we found widespread evidence that Mr. Trump and his organization had worked with a wide array of dubious Russians in arrangements that often raised questions about money laundering. Likewise, those deals don’t seem to interest Congress.
Read more at https://wonkette.com/627801/fusion-gps-just-threw-the-fuck-down-on-trump-and-gop-congress-and-it-was-magnificent#btrwGqbu4bOqhrUZ.99
Money laundering good now?
RandomGuy
01-03-2018, 02:34 PM
:lol truth bombs
:lol release the transcripts
:lol Reck
But, a spokesman for one of those congressional panels is hitting back, saying that Simpson and Fusion’s lawyers have been anything but transparent.
“Despite his public statements, Mr. Simpson and his attorney demanded during the interview that the transcript be kept confidential,” Taylor Foy, a spokesman for the Senate Judiciary Committee, tells The Daily Caller.
http://amp.dailycaller.com/2018/01/03/senate-panel-hits-back-at-fusion-gps-over-op-ed-claims/
Would the existence of Russian records of Trump money laundering be consistent with my theory about Trump being compromised by the Russians in some way? Yes or no.
:lmao Dude said Trump was in on the adoption meeting.
So much denial when your king is involved.
:lol Bannon didn’t even work on the campaign until the month after the meeting
We told Congress that from Manhattan to Sunny Isles Beach, Fla., and from Toronto to Panama, we found widespread evidence that Mr. Trump and his organization had worked with a wide array of dubious Russians in arrangements that often raised questions about money laundering. Likewise, those deals don’t seem to interest Congress.
Suck on that jizz-nugget.
:lol jizz-nugget
:lol triggered adult
:lol taking the word of proven liars running a smear factory
:lol RandomReck
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 02:39 PM
Jr melting down hard right now
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 02:39 PM
:lol Bannon didn’t even work on the campaign until the month after the meetingIrrelevant to the shit he just took on your king.
But keep crying.
https://media1.tenor.com/images/0593cf066bc538c2ea76e2da601ab301/tenor.gif
Spurminator
01-03-2018, 02:40 PM
948632834000019457.
Panic.
I guess we know who Russia is siding with.
Brazil
01-03-2018, 02:49 PM
:lol tbh...
monosylab1k
01-03-2018, 02:49 PM
948620881877721088
:lmao Lawd have mercy
“seventeen candidates, often described as the most talented field ever assembled in the Republican party”
:lmao
spurraider21
01-03-2018, 02:51 PM
“seventeen candidates, often described as the most talented field ever assembled in the Republican party”
:lmao
has ben carson found his luggage yet?
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 02:56 PM
I mean I still think Trump's chances of being impeached are microscopic, but watching Trump and his supporters here melting down never gets old.
:cryNO! BANNON NO SAY BAD THING ABOUT DEAR LEADER!:cry
Brazil
01-03-2018, 02:56 PM
Best Bannon quote is by far: They're sitting on a beach trying to stop a Category Five
:lol
Irrelevant to the shit he just took on your king.
But keep crying.
https://media1.tenor.com/images/0593cf066bc538c2ea76e2da601ab301/tenor.gif
If it was so irrelevant why did you bring it up? Did you not know Bannon wasn’t on the campaign yet?
:lol keep crying. Chump always projecting emotions. Watching you all circle jerk to the Bannon story has been entertaining. Meanwhile the OIG report is getting close to being released and your entire narrative you’ve pushed so hard crumbles. I’m not sure who’s going to it worse, you, djohn, randomguy, or reck.
spurraider21
01-03-2018, 02:57 PM
If it was so irrelevant why did you bring it up? Did you not know Bannon wasn’t on the campaign yet?
:lol keep crying. Chump always projecting emotions. Watching you all circle jerk to the Bannon story has been entertaining. Meanwhile the OIG report is getting close to being released and your entire narrative you’ve pushed so hard crumbles. I’m not sure who’s going to it worse, you, djohn, randomguy, or reck.
bannon not being on the team at that time is irrelevant to the comments he made
candidates always say bad things about other candidates despite never being on their campaign :lol
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 03:01 PM
If it was so irrelevant why did you bring it up?Your bitching about the time he joined the campaign is irrelevant.
Did you not know Bannon wasn’t on the campaign yet?Yes I knew.
Also irrelevant.
Bannon shit on Trump and you can't do anything about it but cry.
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 03:01 PM
948643272095911938
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 03:02 PM
:cryMuh OIG report!:cryI'm sorry, what is your prediction here?
Your bitching about the time he joined the campaign is irrelevant.Yes I knew.
Also irrelevant.
Bannon shit on Trump and you can't do anything about it but cry.
Bannon shit on everyone but Trump. And that’s even giving the questionable reporting by Wolffe a free pass.
I'm sorry, what is your prediction here?
Obama FBI/DOJ were used as a political tool to try and damage Trump before and after election.
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 03:09 PM
Bannon shit on everyone but Trump. And that’s even giving the questionable reporting by Wolffe a free pass.Nope. Dude said he was in on the adoption meeting. Keep crying.
Obama FBI/DOJ were used as a political tool to try and damage Trump before and after election.By verifying intel?
OK.
That's all you got?
:lol
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 03:13 PM
So Obama's going to be impeached?
Nope. Dude said he was in on the adoption meeting. Keep crying.
By verifying intel?
OK.
That's all you got?
:lol
Also rigging the Clinton investigation so she wasn’t charged.
You laugh like none of this is a big deal and nothing will happen but you couldn’t be more wrong.
Take a look at the demotions, reassignments, and who’s retiring...these aren’t low level officials. Obama admin is about to get fucked hard.
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 03:13 PM
Bannon even suggesting Trump seeing the Russians after saying he didn't, that's shitting on Trump and his story.
:lol Pisser
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 03:17 PM
Also rigging the Clinton investigation so she wasn’t charged.
You laugh like none of this is a big deal and nothing will happen but you couldn’t be more wrong.
Take a look at the demotions, reassignments, and who’s retiring...these aren’t low level officials. Obama admin is about to get fucked hard.What are you predicting will happen?
Spell it out.
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 03:19 PM
Bannon even suggesting Trump seeing the Russians after saying he didn't, that's shitting on Trump and his story.
:lol PisserNO IT ISN'T! LEAVE DEAR LEADER ALOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONE!
FlAVaK
01-03-2018, 03:19 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/03/trump-ex-campaign-chair-manafort-sues-mueller-rosenstein-and-department-of-justice.html
Trump ex-Campaign Chair Manafort sues Mueller, Rosenstein, and Department of Justice
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 03:20 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/03/trump-ex-campaign-chair-manafort-sues-mueller-rosenstein-and-department-of-justice.html
Trump ex-Campaign Chair Manafort sues Mueller, Rosenstein, and Department of Justice
Motion to dismiss incoming
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 03:21 PM
I mean TSA has gone from Obama down to Susan Rice going to prison and is reduced to some FBI agents no one ever heard of taking early retirement.
He doesn't realize how small his pet scandal actually became.
monosylab1k
01-03-2018, 03:21 PM
Also rigging the Clinton investigation so she wasn’t charged.
You laugh like none of this is a big deal and nothing will happen but you couldn’t be more wrong.
Take a look at the demotions, reassignments, and who’s retiring...these aren’t low level officials. Obama admin is about to get fucked hard.
Is that before or after Pizzagate indictments go down?
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 03:22 PM
Is that before or after Pizzagate indictments go down?SIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLSSSSSSSSSSSS SSBBBBBBBBYYYYYYYYY
spurraider21
01-03-2018, 03:25 PM
SIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLSSSSSSSSSSSSSSBBB BBBBBYYYYYYYYY
:cry epstein's plane
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 03:27 PM
:cry epstein's planeTHE CHILD SEX DUNGEON IS IN ANOTHER RESTAURANT!
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 03:34 PM
948652743484461058
lol
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 03:39 PM
948652743484461058
lolHell of a letter to get telling you what you did.
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 03:44 PM
948654007521816577
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 03:46 PM
:lol Trying to put Bannon in the memory hole.
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 03:47 PM
948650369571348480
Another fake Christian :lol
I mean TSA has gone from Obama down to Susan Rice going to prison and is reduced to some FBI agents no one ever heard of taking early retirement.
He doesn't realize how small his pet scandal actually became.
I know you’re scared when you are trying to downplay Andrew McCabe, James Baker, Peter Strzok, and Bruce Ohr as low level officials.
Let’s make an ELE bet, loser to kill all accounts and never return. I’ll take the OIG investigation and you take muh Russia. In the end, the evidence from whicever investigation that has the most serious conviction wins. You’ve already got a process crime indictment under your belt and think the OIG is just a small pet scandal so the only way you deny this is if you’re a total coward.
Do you accept the ELE bet yes or no?
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 03:54 PM
I know you’re scared when you are trying to downplay Andrew McCabe, James Baker, Peter Strzok, and Bruce Ohr as low level officials. :lol scared. I didn't say they were low level. I said you never heard of any of them. Why do you lie so much?
:cryBET ME!:cry:lol Dodge #1
What is your prediction for the OIG investigation?
Chris
01-03-2018, 03:59 PM
Bannon good now
From White Supremacist to the bees' knees! Oh Daddy!
Chris
01-03-2018, 04:10 PM
Captain Kirk!
948629540800262144
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 04:11 PM
Captain Kirk!
948629540800262144tweets that *ding*
hitmanyr2k
01-03-2018, 04:18 PM
I mean TSA has gone from Obama down to Susan Rice going to prison and is reduced to some FBI agents no one ever heard of taking early retirement.
He doesn't realize how small his pet scandal actually became.
How did you forget about Seth Rich?!? :lol
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 04:21 PM
948659225240141824
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 04:22 PM
How did you forget about Seth Rich?!? :lolTUCKER CARLSON DID NOT FORGET
Chris
01-03-2018, 04:28 PM
Friendly reminder
947351244422688768
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 04:49 PM
Friendly reminder
947351244422688768
Wikileaks has been deemed a hostile foreign service. Reminder.
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 04:50 PM
948669100070522881
:lmao :lmao :lmao
baseline bum
01-03-2018, 04:51 PM
I guess we know who Russia is siding with.
http://replygif.net/i/1408.gif
RandomGuy
01-03-2018, 04:54 PM
:lol jizz-nugget
:lol triggered adult
:lol taking the word of proven liars running a smear factory
:lol RandomReck
Would the existence of Russian records of Trump money laundering be consistent with my theory about Trump being compromised by the Russians in some way? Yes or no.
RandomGuy
01-03-2018, 05:03 PM
I mean I still think Trump's chances of being impeached are microscopic, but watching Trump and his supporters here melting down never gets old.
:cryNO! BANNON NO SAY BAD THING ABOUT DEAR LEADER!:cry
I think it is increasingly likely. Get Trump on the stand lying about something that they know to be true, and he is done. If they find the Trump Org's money laundering, he's done.
He can't help lying, it is so reflexive for him at his point.
Chris
01-03-2018, 05:05 PM
Bannon selling books. Liberals itching to give Bannon money :lol
spurraider21
01-03-2018, 05:06 PM
Bannon selling books. Liberals itching to give Bannon money :lol
5D chess
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 05:13 PM
Bannon selling books. Liberals itching to give Bannon money :lolBannon didn't write the book, genius. :lmao
spurraider21
01-03-2018, 05:17 PM
Bannon didn't write the book, genius. :lmao
give him a break. he's trying words instead of memes. uncharted waters
Chris
01-03-2018, 05:18 PM
Bannon didn't write the book, genius. :lmao
No shit sherlock :lol
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 05:20 PM
No shit sherlock :lolSo how are liberals lining up to give Bannon money for books Bannon isn't selling? :lol
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 05:21 PM
948678088438812673
Lordy!
monosylab1k
01-03-2018, 05:23 PM
So how are liberals lining up to give Bannon money for books Bannon isn't selling? :lol
15D Chess
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 05:30 PM
948678088438812673
Lordy!
948679695234605056
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 05:31 PM
948680884718202880
:lol scared. I didn't say they were low level. I said you never heard of any of them. Why do you lie so much?
:lol Dodge #1
What is your prediction for the OIG investigation?
Already answered the OIG question. Stop stalling. Do you accept the ELE bet yes or no?
spurraider21
01-03-2018, 05:34 PM
wasnt nunes supposed to recuse himself from this whole thing in the first place? :lol
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 05:34 PM
Already answered the OIG question.Dodge #2. You did not.
You mentioned multiple convictions -- for what?
:lol ELE bet. So serious.
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 05:35 PM
wasnt nunes supposed to recuse himself from this whole thing in the first place? :lol
Yes. Then he put in place a deadline for the FBI/DOJ to over documents to him.
Chris
01-03-2018, 05:36 PM
So how are liberals lining up to give Bannon money for books Bannon isn't selling? :lol
So assuming he doesn't get a cut from the book, you don't think every left leaning journalist is itching for a one on one with Steve Bannon? Breitbart has been in the shitter ever since Shapiro left. Bannon is desperate for attention.
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 05:38 PM
948684198738526208
wasnt nunes supposed to recuse himself from this whole thing in the first place? :lol
It was a bullshit accusation cooked up by the Dems. Nunes was cleared by the ethics committee.
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 05:40 PM
So assuming he doesn't get a cut from the book, you don't think every left leaning journalist is itching for a one on one with Steve Bannon?Bannon gets paid for neither tbh. These aren't celebrity baby pictures.
Breitbart has been in the shitter ever since Shapiro left. Bannon is desperate for attention.Breitbart and Bannon bad now.
RandomGuy
01-03-2018, 05:40 PM
It was a bullshit accusation cooked up by the Dems. Nunes was cleared by the ethics committee.
Would the existence of Russian records of Trump money laundering be consistent with my theory about Trump being compromised by the Russians in some way? Yes or no.
Chris
01-03-2018, 05:41 PM
"enraged Trump" :lol
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 05:41 PM
It was a bullshit accusation cooked up by the Dems. Nunes was cleared by the ethics committee.
He interfered with the investigation while he was recused. Pisser.
Dodge #2. You did not.
You mentioned multiple convictions -- for what?
:lol ELE bet. So serious.
I answered, you just didn’t like it.
:lol dodging an ELE bet...so scared
I know the thought of never posting here again is terrifying but it’s time for you to sack up.
Do you accept the ELE bet yes or no?
Chris
01-03-2018, 05:42 PM
Bannon gets paid for neither tbh.
How do you know?
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 05:42 PM
Chris is so triggered he hasn't used a meme yet.
Would the existence of Russian records of Trump money laundering be consistent with my theory about Trump being compromised by the Russians in some way? Yes or no.
Yes. But there’s no existence of it. But you keep taking the word of lyin Glenn, ask Reck how well that worked out.
He interfered with the investigation while he was recused. Pisser.
Shocking the ethics committee made zero mention of that.
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 05:46 PM
:cryDodge #3. You always shit yourself and try to distract when you get a hard question about what you actually think. Too bad.
:lol ELE bet and personal insults. You're definitely mad about this and can't hide it.
:crysack up:cry
I’ll offer anyone on this board the ELE bet Chumpdumper is too pussy to accept.
I take OIG investigation results ending in convictions, you get Mueller’s results ending in convictions.
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 05:47 PM
I take OIG investigation results ending in convictionsConvictions for what?
Sack up.
RandomGuy
01-03-2018, 05:52 PM
Yes. But there’s no existence of it. But you keep taking the word of lyin Glenn, ask Reck how well that worked out.
I have said all along, and I get to have a professional opinion on it, that if there was anything out there, it would be money laundering.
Lo' and behold they started looking and found the red flags signaling the same thing.
I don't have to take anybody's word, sport-o. Trump organization people are not very bright. His kids will be the weak link. They are laughably incompetent, and more so than their dad.
Remember: "I love it"?
You think that they won't have a similar trail when it comes to laundering money? :lol
RandomGuy
01-03-2018, 05:54 PM
I take OIG investigation results ending in convictions
www.notgoingtohappen.com
The only thing more predictable than Trump not criticizing Putin is that your predictions fail.
monosylab1k
01-03-2018, 05:55 PM
Chris is so triggered he hasn't used a meme yet.
:lol
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 05:56 PM
948680105576095750
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 05:58 PM
948680105576095750Probably giving him a list of the Democrats that will be sent to Gitmo when Trump declares martial law after the next nationwide wave of Antifa riots.
RandomGuy
01-03-2018, 05:58 PM
So assuming he doesn't get a cut from the book, you don't think every left leaning journalist is itching for a one on one with Steve Bannon? Breitbart has been in the shitter ever since Shapiro left. Bannon is desperate for attention.
I thought you said Trump is playing 5D chess? :rollin
More like tic tac toe.
http://dreamgreen.org/images/ttc/TicTac-case2.jpg
Chris
01-03-2018, 06:01 PM
I thought you said Trump is playing 5D chess? :rollin
More like tic tac toe.
http://dreamgreen.org/images/ttc/TicTac-case2.jpg
Bannon got fired.
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 06:03 PM
Bannon got fired.Who hired Bannon and appointed him to the NSC?
Chris
01-03-2018, 06:17 PM
Who hired Bannon and appointed him to the NSC?
What's your point?
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 06:18 PM
What's your point?I will tell you the point when you answer the simple question.
Who hired Bannon and appointed him to the NSC?
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 06:35 PM
My nigga John pimpslapping TSA like a 2 dollar whore. Or in layman's terms, Chris' mammy.
948697184014303232
I have said all along, and I get to have a professional opinion on it, that if there was anything out there, it would be money laundering.
Lo' and behold they started looking and found the red flags signaling the same thing.
I don't have to take anybody's word, sport-o. Trump organization people are not very bright. His kids will be the weak link. They are laughably incompetent, and more so than their dad.
Remember: "I love it"?
You think that they won't have a similar trail when it comes to laundering money? :lol
And you touted the op-ed from Fusion GPS as some sort of validation. You even made it in huge font :lol
They’ve already been exposed for lying in the op-ed. Try again.
Chris
01-03-2018, 06:39 PM
My nigga John pimpslapping TSA like a 2 dollar whore. Or in layman's terms, Chris' mammy.
948697184014303232
Ebonics good now. Just don't say sewed up when your around djohn in Houston or he will correct you.
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 06:44 PM
Ebonics good now. Just don't say sewed up when your around djohn in Houston or he will correct you.
Where are your memes Chris? You seem extra mad today.
Chris
01-03-2018, 06:45 PM
:cry Drake memes :cry
Spurminator
01-03-2018, 06:47 PM
This lovers quarrel must be making Ben Garrison's head explode. Who to favor in his next piece of alt-right naruto art?
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 06:48 PM
Chris has moved on from memes to fake quotes. Bannon broke off in that ass.
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 06:49 PM
948670674997886976
My nigga John pimpslapping TSA like a 2 dollar whore. Or in layman's terms, Chris' mammy.
948697184014303232
Clapper’s office put out the JAR report :rollin
Chris
01-03-2018, 06:50 PM
Chris has moved on from memes to fake quotes. Bannon broke off in that ass.
Bannon got fired.
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 06:50 PM
Bannon got fired.Who hired him and appointed him to the NSC?
www.notgoingtohappen.com
The only thing more predictable than Trump not criticizing Putin is that your predictions fail.
You are free to take the ELE bet if you’re so sure.
Splits
01-03-2018, 06:52 PM
948670674997886976
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html?utm_source=tw&utm_medium=s3&utm_campaign=sharebutton-t
Dodge #3. You always shit yourself and try to distract when you get a hard question about what you actually think. Too bad.
:lol ELE bet and personal insults. You're definitely mad about this and can't hide it.
:crysack up:cry
The unlawful exoneration of Hillary Clinton by political operatives in the DOJ/FBI.
The unlawful destruction of evidence; and the manipulation of investigative protocols to gain a specific and pre-planned political outcome. (Peter Strzok, Andrew McCabe)
The unlawful use of the FISA court for political spy operations by the DOJ/FBI.
The unlawful use of the Dept of Justice National Security Division. For weaponized political benefit. (Sally Yates, Loretta Lynch, Bruce Ohr)
The unlawful use of the FBI Counterintelligence Division. For weaponized political benefit. (James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, James Baker)
The unlawful use of a Special Counsel (Mueller) investigation to hide the conspiracy; (James Baker, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Bruce Ohr, Andrew Weissman, Jeannie Rhee, Aaron Zebley)
Now, are you going to accept the ELE bet yes or no?
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 06:56 PM
The unlawful exoneration of Hillary Clinton by political operatives in the DOJ/FBI.Let's walk through those.
Is there an actual unlawful exoneration statute out there?
Spurminator
01-03-2018, 06:56 PM
898870621584596993
898964640817983488
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 07:10 PM
948697699464949763
Lawd!
Splits
01-03-2018, 07:10 PM
Let's walk through those.
Is there an actual unlawful exoneration statute out there?
No, just some dude posting crazy. Those are "down-stream legal issues"
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/03/fusion-gps-tries-and-fails-to-distance-themselves-from-fbi-fisa-origin/
Steve Bannen :lol
Is Chris doing Ok? :lmao
Chris
01-03-2018, 07:13 PM
Steve Bannen :lol
Is Chris doing Ok? :lmao
Bannon got fired.
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 07:14 PM
No, just some dude posting crazy. Those are "down-stream legal issues"
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/03/fusion-gps-tries-and-fails-to-distance-themselves-from-fbi-fisa-origin/Thanks for saving me a google search.
:lol sundance
sundance!
:lol TSA
Chris
01-03-2018, 07:17 PM
948697699464949763
Lawd!
Maddow rubbing one out to unnamed sources. Lawd!
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 07:17 PM
948697699464949763
Lawd!
948706905756766209
:lol big ass grin
Maddow rubbing one out to unnamed sources. Lawd!
I hope this is to put Nunes is line. He's going off the rails.
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 07:31 PM
948710669406351361
Chris
01-03-2018, 07:33 PM
I hope this is to put Nunes is line. He's going off the rails.
Nunes is doing his job. If anything has gone off the rails, it's this never ending Mueller investigation which is going to cost taxpayers close to a billion dollars.
Thanks for saving me a google search.
:lol sundance
sundance!
:lol TSA
You wanted what they could be possibly convicted for. You got it. At this point all you are doing is stalling and looking like a coward. We don’t need to walk through anything. The terms of the ELE bet were clear.
Seriousness of convictions based on OIG.
Seriousness of convictions based on muh Russia.
You’ve already got two indictments in hand with muh Russia. Stop being a pussy.
Do you accept the ELE bet yes or no?
spurraider21
01-03-2018, 07:40 PM
:cry mueller investigation taking too long and wasting too much money
:madrun lets re-hash and re-open the clinton investigation!
Nunes is doing his job. If anything has gone off the rails, it's this never ending Mueller investigation which is going to cost taxpayers close to a billion dollars.
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 07:41 PM
You wanted what they could be possibly convicted for. You got it.I don't think unlawful exoneration is a crime tbh -- so I don't think I "got it."
You copypastad sundance.
sundance!
:lol ELE bets
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 07:43 PM
Somebody needs to tell Chris Benghazi investigation cost more money and produced less indictments.
I don't think unlawful exoneration is a crime tbh -- so I don't think I "got it."
You copypastad sundance.
sundance!
:lol ELE bets
More stalling, more cowardice.
We don’t need to walk through anything. The terms of the ELE bet were clear.
Seriousness of convictions based on OIG.
Seriousness of convictions based on muh Russia.
You’ve already got two indictments in hand with muh Russia. Stop being a pussy.
Do you accept the ELE bet yes or no?
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 07:46 PM
We don’t need to walk through anything.I disagree.
I have never heard of a crime called unlawful exoneration. Maybe you could define the offense and resulting penalties for me, sundance.
Chris
01-03-2018, 07:48 PM
Somebody needs to tell Chris Benghazi investigation cost more money and produced less indictments.
I wonder why? Maybe because the FBI and DOJ were determined to clear Hillary come hell or highwater just like the Comey investigation? Hillary laughing her ass off and her "note of levity" -she knew nothing was going to happen to her.
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 07:50 PM
948715768409153536
lol
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 07:50 PM
I wonder why? Maybe because the FBI and DOJ were determined to clear Hillary come hell or highwater just like the Comey investigation? Hillary laughing her ass off and her "note of levity" -she knew nothing was going to happen to her.
What was she charged with?
Chris
01-03-2018, 07:51 PM
Bannon got fired for being stinky. Thanks Kyle!
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 07:51 PM
I wonder why? Maybe because the FBI and DOJ were determined to clear Hillary come hell or highwater just like the Comey investigation? Hillary laughing her ass off and her "note of levity" -she knew nothing was going to happen to her.The FBI and DOJ did not investigate Benghazi, Chris. Those were congressional investigations -- and all the committees were majority Republican with Republican chairs.
Nunes is doing his job. If anything has gone off the rails, it's this never ending Mueller investigation which is going to cost taxpayers close to a billion dollars.
:lol Inspector Clousseau doing his job
:lol Running around at midnight
:lol But mah unmasking :cry
Not a great day for you and TSA. :lol
Chris
01-03-2018, 07:53 PM
What was she charged with?
Do you always ask questions you know the answer to? You and Pavlov are so scared to say anything. :lol
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 07:53 PM
Chris extra serious today yall. Not one meme yet.
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 07:54 PM
Do you always ask questions you know the answer to? You and Pavlov are so scared to say anything. :lol
It's a simple question for you.
Chris
01-03-2018, 07:56 PM
Chris extra serious today yall. Not one meme yet.
You have multiple posts ITT today trying to narrate my feelings. It's serious business for you I'm sure :lol
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 07:57 PM
You have multiple posts ITT today trying to narrate my feelings. It's serious business for you I'm sure :lol
Struck a nerve eh :lol
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 07:58 PM
https://i.redd.it/58so826qfovy.jpg
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 07:58 PM
948715768409153536
lolOnly caveat is Wolff doesn't have the greatest reputation as a writer. Still worth the lols and the reaction of Trump supporters here.
Only caveat is Wolff doesn't have the greatest reputation as a writer. Still worth the lols and the reaction of Trump supporters here.
If he was smart, he'd have Bannon on tape dictating quotes. :lol
I disagree.
I have never heard of a crime called unlawful exoneration. Maybe you could define the offense and resulting penalties for me, sundance.
That’s great, you don’t have to worry about anyone being convicted of it. Another great thing about the bet is that we don’t have to discuss which crimes are more severe until anyone is convicted.
The terms of the ELE bet were clear.
Seriousness of convictions based on OIG.
Seriousness of convictions based on muh Russia.
You’ve already got two indictments in hand with muh Russia. Stop being a pussy.
Do you accept the ELE bet yes or no?
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 08:14 PM
That’s great, you don’t have to worry about anyone being convicted of it. Another great thing about the bet is that we don’t have to discuss which crimes are more severe until anyone is convicted.How is not discussing anything great?
It'd be great if you could bring yourself to discuss the unlawful exoneration laws you alluded to in your article, sundance.
How is not discussing anything great?
It'd be great if you could bring yourself to discuss the unlawful exoneration laws you listed in your article, sundance.
We can discuss the convictions as they come up.
The terms of the ELE bet were clear.
Seriousness of convictions based on OIG.
Seriousness of convictions based on muh Russia.
You’ve already got two indictments in hand with muh Russia. Stop being a pussy.
Do you accept the ELE bet yes or no?
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 08:17 PM
We can discuss the convictions as they come up. Let's discuss the crime of unlawful exoneration you described in your blog post, sundance.
We can discuss the convictions as they come up.
The terms of the ELE bet were clear.
Seriousness of convictions based on OIG.
Seriousness of convictions based on muh Russia.
You’ve already got two indictments in hand with muh Russia. Stop being a pussy.
Do you accept the ELE bet yes or no?
Aren't you already behind the 8 ball?
2 guilty pleads directly related to "muh russia."
Is sort of over.
Can you lay out indictments that can possibly come out from the OIG?
Let's discuss the crime of unlawful exoneration you described in your blog post, sundance.
Confirmed coward. Moving on.
Aren't you already behind the 8 ball?
2 guilty pleads directly related to "muh russia."
Is sort of over.
Can you lay out indictments that can possibly come out from the OIG?
Yes, it’s like I’m letting you start the game up 2 touchdowns. I’d ask you to accept the bet but you’re a confirmed welcher.
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 08:20 PM
Confirmed coward. Moving on.Moving on to our discussion of the crime of unlawful exoneration you described in your blog post, sundance?
Yes, it’s like I’m letting you start the game up 2 touchdowns. I’d ask you to accept the bet but you’re a confirmed welcher.
Taking a troll board seriously. :lol
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 08:24 PM
Yes, it’s like I’m letting you start the game up 2 touchdowns. I’d ask you to accept the bet but you’re a confirmed welcher.
Lol more like you threw 5 pick sixes with the defense highstepping to the end zone on your ass and are down 35-0 at the end of the third quarter.
Pavlov
01-03-2018, 08:25 PM
Taking a troll board seriously. :lolSundance doesn't want to discuss anything on the discussion board anymore.
Spurminator
01-03-2018, 08:25 PM
We can discuss the convictions as they come up.
The terms of the ELE bet were clear.
Seriousness of convictions based on OIG.
Seriousness of convictions based on muh Russia.
You’ve already got two indictments in hand with muh Russia. Stop being a pussy.
Do you accept the ELE bet yes or no?
I'm starting to think, besides the unhealthy obsession with ridiculous right-wing conspiracy theories, you might have a gambling problem.
Did the FBI pay Christopher Steele, author of the dossier?
Was the dossier the basis for securing FISA warrants to spy on Americans? And why won’t the FBI show Congress the FISA application?
When did the FBI get the complete dossier and who gave it to them?
Dossier author Christopher Steele?
Fusion GPS?
Clinton campaign/DNC?
Sen. McCain’s staffer?
Did the FBI validate and corroborate the dossier?
Did Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, or Bruce Orr work on the FISA application?
Why and how often did DOJ lawyer Bruce Orr meet with dossier author Christopher Steele during the 2016 campaign?
Why did DOJ lawyer Bruce Orr meet with Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson after the election? To get their story straight after their candidate Clinton lost? Or to double down and plan how they were going to go after President-elect Trump?
When and how did the FBI learn that DOJ lawyer Bruce Orr’s wife, Nellie Orr, worked for Fusion GPS? And what exactly was Nellie Orr’s role in putting together the dossier?
Why did the FBI release text messages between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page? Normally, ongoing investigation is reason not to make such information public.
And why did FBI release only 375/10,000+ texts? Were they the best? Worst? Or part of a broader strategy to focus attention away from something else? And when can Americans see the other 96% of texts?
Why did Lisa Page leave Mueller probe two weeks before Peter Strzok? This was two weeks before FBI and Special Counsel even knew about the texts.
Why did the intelligence community wait two months after the election to brief President-elect Trump on the dossier (January 6, 2017)? Why was James Comey selected to do the briefing?
Was the briefing done to “legitimize” the dossier? And who leaked the fact that the briefing was about the dossier?
The New York Times reported last week that George Popadopoulos’ loose lips were a catalyst for launching the Russia investigation. Was President-elect Trump briefed on this?
Why did Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson meet with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya before and after her meeting with Donald Trump Jr.?
Why was FBI General Counsel Jim Baker reassigned two weeks ago? Was he the source for the first story on the dossier by David Corn on October 31, 2016? Or was it someone else at the FBI?
Why won’t the FBI give Congress the documents it’s requesting?
And why would @SenSchumer, leader of the Democrat party, publicly warn President-elect Trump on Jan. 3, 2017 that when you mess with the “intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you?”
djohn2oo8
01-03-2018, 08:28 PM
I take pride knowing he can't post on his main account because of me.
Chris
01-03-2018, 08:29 PM
I’d ask you to accept the bet but you’re a confirmed welcher.
Really? :lol I'm not surprised :lol
https://media1.giphy.com/media/3og0IMJcSI8p6hYQXS/giphy.gif
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.