Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[RandomGuy]

That would still surprise the hell out of me, considering the leaks have gone out of their way to try to make Pence look above the fray, and Bannon would want no part of hurting Trump to help Pence. It's Trump or bust for getting his nationalist crap implemented. I think Priebus being the main leaker makes way more sense, as the GOP has to be massively frustrated at not getting their agenda fastracked when they're controlling the house, senate, white house, and supreme court. Plus it would make sense that someone making Pence look squeaky clean would be doing it for the benefit of the party. Maybe the Cuckner stuff is coming from Bannon, but I'd doubt any of the other shit.

Hard to tell. Bannon is one of the scummiest people I have seen in US Politics, and he imagines himself every bit the Machiavellian schemer.

I think you have a good point here.

[RandomGuy]

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/47/60/84/476084500b33cc2bf204d16a173032fd.jpg

[RandomGuy]

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/46/4e/be/464ebee96893999dd2541be932bb4948.jpg

[baseline bum]

Hard to tell. Bannon is one of the scummiest people I have seen in US Politics, and he imagines himself every bit the Machiavellian schemer.

I think you have a good point here.

Though if it really is Bannon singing to the press about Cuckner it would mean Trump would have to be squeaky clean on Russia. If so I'd actually be really impressed, because it would be Bannon pulling the ultimate troll job on the media. Because there is no option B for Bannon: Trump is the candidate he cultivated for implementing his nationalist agenda once a disgraced Palin stepped off the public stage.

[boutons_deux]

Paul Ryan Reported to FBI for Fraud and Obstruction (http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/6/2/1668184/-Paul-Ryan-Reported-to-FBI-for-Fraud-and-Obstruction)

https://twitter.com/funder/status/870471341262200832?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailykos.com%2Fstory%2F20 17%2F6%2F2%2F1668184%2F-Paul-Ryan-Reported-to-FBI-for-Fraud-and-Obstruction

https://twitter.com/funder/status/870473743835041792?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailykos.com%2Fstory%2F20 17%2F6%2F2%2F1668184%2F-Paul-Ryan-Reported-to-FBI-for-Fraud-and-Obstruction

[djohn2oo8]

870755640246972417

[djohn2oo8]

Though if it really is Bannon singing to the press about Cuckner it would mean Trump would have to be squeaky clean on Russia. If so I'd actually be really impressed, because it would be Bannon pulling the ultimate troll job on the media. Because there is no option B for Bannon: Trump is the candidate he cultivated for implementing his nationalist agenda once a disgraced Palin stepped off the public stage.

lol no. Bannon hates Trump. He's actually fucking over Trump by squealing on Kushner.

[djohn2oo8]

870758552956219397
CROFL Trump

[monosylab1k]

Paul Ryan Reported to FBI for Fraud and Obstruction (http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/6/2/1668184/-Paul-Ryan-Reported-to-FBI-for-Fraud-and-Obstruction)

https://twitter.com/funder/status/870471341262200832?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailykos.com%2Fstory%2F20 17%2F6%2F2%2F1668184%2F-Paul-Ryan-Reported-to-FBI-for-Fraud-and-Obstruction

https://twitter.com/funder/status/870473743835041792?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailykos.com%2Fstory%2F20 17%2F6%2F2%2F1668184%2F-Paul-Ryan-Reported-to-FBI-for-Fraud-and-Obstruction

:lmao a bunch of twitter nerds filed a case nobody will take seriously. This is less legitimate than the Spurs fan trying to slap a restraining order on Zaza.

[djohn2oo8]

870759337219805184

[djohn2oo8]

:lmao a bunch of twitter nerds filed a case nobody will take seriously. This is less legitimate than the Spurs fan trying to slap a restraining order on Zaza.

That won't matter. Ryan has been recorded taking money. He's already fucked.

[boutons_deux]

White House orders agencies to ignore Democrats’ oversight requests

Trump’s aides are trying to shut down the release of information that could be used to attack the president.

The White House is telling federal agencies to blow off Democratic lawmakers' oversight requests, as Republicans fear the information could be weaponized against President Donald Trump.

At meetings with top officials for various government departments this spring, Uttam Dhillon, a White House lawyer,

told agencies not to cooperate with such requests from Democrats,

according to Republican sources inside and outside the administration

It appears to be a formalization of a practice that had already taken hold, as

Democrats have complained that their oversight letters requesting information from agencies have gone unanswered since January,

and the Trump administration has not yet explained the rationale.

The declaration amounts to a new level of partisanship in Washington, where the president and his administration already feels besieged by media reports and attacks from Democrats.

The idea, Republicans said, is to choke off the Democratic congressional minorities from gaining new information that could be used to attack the president.

https://www.dailykos.com/story/2017/6/2/1668210/-Trump-orders-agencies-to-ignore-information-requests-from-Democrats?detail=emaildkre

now we have Repugs laying autocracy on top of corporatocracy.

Martial law up next?

[djohn2oo8]

870757496125837312

[djohn2oo8]

870745312545173508

[RandomGuy]

White House orders agencies to ignore Democrats’ oversight requests

Trump’s aides are trying to shut down the release of information that could be used to attack the president.

The White House is telling federal agencies to blow off Democratic lawmakers' oversight requests, as Republicans fear the information could be weaponized against President Donald Trump.

At meetings with top officials for various government departments this spring, Uttam Dhillon, a White House lawyer,

told agencies not to cooperate with such requests from Democrats,

according to Republican sources inside and outside the administration

It appears to be a formalization of a practice that had already taken hold, as

Democrats have complained that their oversight letters requesting information from agencies have gone unanswered since January,

and the Trump administration has not yet explained the rationale.

The declaration amounts to a new level of partisanship in Washington, where the president and his administration already feels besieged by media reports and attacks from Democrats.

The idea, Republicans said, is to choke off the Democratic congressional minorities from gaining new information that could be used to attack the president.

https://www.dailykos.com/story/2017/6/2/1668210/-Trump-orders-agencies-to-ignore-information-requests-from-Democrats?detail=emaildkre

now we have Repugs laying autocracy on top of corporatocracy.

Martial law up next?




If true that does take partisanship to the next level.

[djohn2oo8]

870751649198997504

[djohn2oo8]

870724951506132997

[baseline bum]

lol no. Bannon hates Trump. He's actually fucking over Trump by squealing on Kushner.

LOL what? Trump is Bannon's dream president. Trump is great at fanning the flames of his voters' anger, he loves a fight, and he's so fucking lazy he'll just let Bannon do his work for him. If Trump goes down Bannon becomes a nobody overnight. Bannon needs a Trump presidency so he can transform the GOP from an evangelical conservative party to a right wing nationalist one. This is Bannon's one chance, he'll never get another if Trump goes down in flames.

[TSA]

Paul Ryan Reported to FBI for Fraud and Obstruction (http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/6/2/1668184/-Paul-Ryan-Reported-to-FBI-for-Fraud-and-Obstruction)

https://twitter.com/funder/status/870471341262200832?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailykos.com%2Fstory%2F20 17%2F6%2F2%2F1668184%2F-Paul-Ryan-Reported-to-FBI-for-Fraud-and-Obstruction

https://twitter.com/funder/status/870473743835041792?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailykos.com%2Fstory%2F20 17%2F6%2F2%2F1668184%2F-Paul-Ryan-Reported-to-FBI-for-Fraud-and-Obstruction

:lol Scott Dworkin and the Democratic Coalition :lol

[TSA]

870758552956219397
CROFL Trump

"sources familiar with Comey's thinking"

:lmao

[TSA]

That won't matter. Ryan has been recorded taking money. He's already fucked.

Are you going to tell us more or can I save you the time and just check Louise Mensch's twitter feed?

[TSA]

White House orders agencies to ignore Democrats’ oversight requests

Trump’s aides are trying to shut down the release of information that could be used to attack the president.

The White House is telling federal agencies to blow off Democratic lawmakers' oversight requests, as Republicans fear the information could be weaponized against President Donald Trump.

At meetings with top officials for various government departments this spring, Uttam Dhillon, a White House lawyer,

told agencies not to cooperate with such requests from Democrats,

according to Republican sources inside and outside the administration

It appears to be a formalization of a practice that had already taken hold, as

Democrats have complained that their oversight letters requesting information from agencies have gone unanswered since January,

and the Trump administration has not yet explained the rationale.

The declaration amounts to a new level of partisanship in Washington, where the president and his administration already feels besieged by media reports and attacks from Democrats.

The idea, Republicans said, is to choke off the Democratic congressional minorities from gaining new information that could be used to attack the president.

https://www.dailykos.com/story/2017/6/2/1668210/-Trump-orders-agencies-to-ignore-information-requests-from-Democrats?detail=emaildkre

now we have Repugs laying autocracy on top of corporatocracy.

Martial law up next?




Hmmm....I've seen this strategy employed somewhere recently

[boutons_deux]

Will Trump block Comey testimony? White House does not know yet

White House officials said on Friday they did not know yet whether President Donald Trump will seek to block former FBI Director James Comey from testifying to Congress next week, a move that could spark a political backlash.

"I have not spoken to counsel yet. I don't know how they're going to respond," White House spokesman Sean Spicer told reporters.

Comey was leading a Federal Bureau of Investigation probe into alleged Russian meddling in last year's U.S. presidential election
and possible collusion by Trump's campaign when the president fired him last month.

Critics have charged that Trump was seeking to hinder the FBI's investigation by dismissing Comey.

Presidents can assert executive privilege to prevent government employees from sharing information.

However, legal experts say it is not clear whether certain conversations between Trump and Comey that the president has talked about publicly would be covered, and

any effort to block Comey, who is now a private citizen, from testifying could be challenged in court.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-idUSKBN18T1WZ?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=Social

Do It, Just Do It! :lol swoosh!

[djohn2oo8]

Will Trump block Comey testimony? White House does not know yet

White House officials said on Friday they did not know yet whether President Donald Trump will seek to block former FBI Director James Comey from testifying to Congress next week, a move that could spark a political backlash.

"I have not spoken to counsel yet. I don't know how they're going to respond," White House spokesman Sean Spicer told reporters.

Comey was leading a Federal Bureau of Investigation probe into alleged Russian meddling in last year's U.S. presidential election
and possible collusion by Trump's campaign when the president fired him last month.

Critics have charged that Trump was seeking to hinder the FBI's investigation by dismissing Comey.

Presidents can assert executive privilege to prevent government employees from sharing information.

However, legal experts say it is not clear whether certain conversations between Trump and Comey that the president has talked about publicly would be covered, and

any effort to block Comey, who is now a private citizen, from testifying could be challenged in court.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-idUSKBN18T1WZ?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=Social

Do It, Just Do It! :lol swoosh!




Yeah Trump waived executive privilege once he tweeted about Comey. He can't block shit.

[djohn2oo8]

870771844181368836
CROFL

[djohn2oo8]

870779897429598208
:lol

[djohn2oo8]

870330243097276416
:lmao WaPo pushing in his dookie.

[boutons_deux]

Can Trump Stop Comey from Testifying?

Neither the doctrine of separation of powers nor the generalized need for confidentiality of high-level communications, without more, can sustain an absolute, unqualified Presidential privilege of immunity from judicial process under all circumstances. …

Absent a claim of need to protect military, diplomatic, or sensitive national security secrets, the confidentiality of Presidential communications is not significantly diminished by producing material for a criminal trial under the protected conditions of in camera inspection,

and any absolute executive privilege under Art. II of the Constitution would plainly conflict with the function of the courts under the Constitution.

he would still have to convince a judge he is using his authority in way that will benefit national security needs and the like.

http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/can-trump-stop-comey-from-testifying/

[spurraider21]

:lmao lawnewz

[djohn2oo8]

Can Trump Stop Comey from Testifying?

Neither the doctrine of separation of powers nor the generalized need for confidentiality of high-level communications, without more, can sustain an absolute, unqualified Presidential privilege of immunity from judicial process under all circumstances. …

Absent a claim of need to protect military, diplomatic, or sensitive national security secrets, the confidentiality of Presidential communications is not significantly diminished by producing material for a criminal trial under the protected conditions of in camera inspection,

and any absolute executive privilege under Art. II of the Constitution would plainly conflict with the function of the courts under the Constitution.

he would still have to convince a judge he is using his authority in way that will benefit national security needs and the like.

http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/can-trump-stop-comey-from-testifying/




870663158628745220

[florige]

870663158628745220

Oopsie.

[djohn2oo8]

WSJ - But Mr. Trump may have effectively waived his right to executive privilege when he disclosed publicly the content of some of his conversations with Mr. Comey about the FBI’s Russia probe, legal experts said.

[DarrinS]

I'm guessing the ctrl, c, and v keys on John's keyboard are very worn.

[djohn2oo8]

Funny. Trump complained about Hillary and her emails yet his whole team tried deleting theirs.

[tlongII]

If true that does take partisanship to the next level.

It's dailykos so I doubt it.

[spurraider21]

also why is nunes requesting subpoenas relating to this shit? i thought he had to recuse himself. if so, he could be able to bring people in to investigate NSA practices in general, but not specific to the russia stuff, flynn, etc

could be wrong on that, just going off memory
not to go full djohn :lol... but this is relevant to my post from a few days ago

870326557151244288

[Reck]

LOL what? Trump is Bannon's dream president. Trump is great at fanning the flames of his voters' anger, he loves a fight, and he's so fucking lazy he'll just let Bannon do his work for him. If Trump goes down Bannon becomes a nobody overnight. Bannon needs a Trump presidency so he can transform the GOP from an evangelical conservative party to a right wing nationalist one. This is Bannon's one chance, he'll never get another if Trump goes down in flames.

Thing is Trump has an even bigger ego than Bannon. Isn't the reason Bannon got demoted because the media portrayed Bannon as the real shot caller?

Trump is definitely being manipuated by Bannon but in Trump's mind he's the one calling the shots. He's not deferring to Bannon knowingly.

[Reck]

I actually want Trump to try to block Comey so he can look even more crooked than he let on. Then have his request denied because he talked shit about tapes and tried intimidations tactics on a former FBI director.

[Thread]

I actually want Trump to try to block Comey so he can look even more crooked than he let on. Then have his request denied because he talked shit about tapes and tried intimidations tactics on a former FBI director.

Just an aside, Recky:::say Trump gets impeached and convicted by the end of the calendar year. Does Pence get the remainder of this term, + 2 more runs, or, just 1 more run?

[baseline bum]

Just an aside, Recky:::say Trump gets impeached and convicted by the end of the calendar year. Does Pence get the remainder of this term, + 2 more runs, or, just 1 more run?

Hopefully just the remainder of the term.

[Reck]

Just an aside, Recky:::say Trump gets impeached and convicted by the end of the calendar year. Does Pence get the remainder of this term, + 2 more runs, or, just 1 more run?

You should know more than me about this stuff. I'm a newbie.

[Thread]

You should know more than me about this stuff. I'm a newbie.

I imagine he'd get this term and two more because that's what LBJ got till he decided not to run in '68.

I'd hate to lose Trump, but, Pence would be suitable. Can you imagine how'd they take advantage of him? That poor schmuck.

[Reck]

I imagine he'd get this term and two more because that's what LBJ got till he decided not to run in '68.

I'd hate to lose Trump, but, Pence would be suitable. Can you imagine how'd they take advantage of him? That poor schmuck.

He wouldn't last. He's a doormat and as a Trump replacement he'd be just a lame duck.

[Thread]

He wouldn't last. He's a doormat and as a Trump replacement he'd be just a lame duck.

Yep, they'd eat him alive.

[spurraider21]

Just an aside, Recky:::say Trump gets impeached and convicted by the end of the calendar year. Does Pence get the remainder of this term, + 2 more runs, or, just 1 more run?he'd get 2 more runs if he serves less than 2 years of this current term

[Thread]

he'd get 2 more runs if he serves less than 2 years of this current term

I do not believe Trump could survive the vote in the Senate.

[djohn2oo8]

Thing is Trump has an even bigger ego than Bannon. Isn't the reason Bannon got demoted because the media portrayed Bannon as the real shot caller?

Trump is definitely being manipuated by Bannon but in Trump's mind he's the one calling the shots. He's not deferring to Bannon knowingly.

Yes. Trump HATES it when people say President Bannon.

[djohn2oo8]

Hopefully just the remainder of the term.

The election would be invalidated.

[baseline bum]

The election would be invalidated.

How is that going to work? The election was never invalidated when Nixon was about to be removed.

[Thread]

How is that going to work? The election was never invalidated when Nixon was about to be removed.

Nor when Clinton was impeached.

[Thread]

The election would be invalidated.

The old crab ass gave ya somethin' to ponder about on a weekend, eh, dj?

tee, hee.

[Thread]

.

[Thread]

Yes. Trump HATES it when people say President Bannon.

That's an unnamed source that said that, Recky/dj. That's like the Persians in the hot gates:::their numbers don't count for shit.

[djohn2oo8]

How is that going to work? The election was never invalidated when Nixon was about to be removed.

This is way deeper than watergate. Colluding with a foreign power, money laundering, espionage etc. The Supreme Court can invalidate the election and all of Trump's appointments. This is the first major case of Treason in US history. No precedent for this and cannot be compared to anything prior.

Nor when Clinton was impeached.
That was a blowjob. Not treason.

[Thread]

This is way deeper than watergate. Colluding with a foreign power, money laundering, espionage etc. The Supreme Court can invalidate the election and all of Trump's appointments. This is the first major case of Treason in US history. No precedent for this.

That was a blowjob. Not treason.

Bottom line? Bill Clinton remains the lone duly elected U.S. President to be IMPEACHED.

ha, ha.

[djohn2oo8]

Bottom line? Bill Clinton remains the lone duly elected U.S. President to be IMPEACHED.

ha, ha.

Bottom line. Multiple grand juries empaneled on Team Treason.

[Reck]

Bottom line? Bill Clinton remains the lone duly elected U.S. President to be IMPEACHED.

ha, ha.

He served his two terms..in completion. Ha-ha.

[djohn2oo8]

He served his two terms..in completion. Ha-ha.

lol

[Thread]

He served his two terms..in completion. Ha-ha.

Though Bill Clinton remains the lone duly elected U.S. President to be IMPEACHED.

ha, ha.

[Thread]

lol

You two should get a room and have Sunday brunch after ya do it.

[baseline bum]

This is way deeper than watergate. Colluding with a foreign power, money laundering, espionage etc. The Supreme Court can invalidate the election and all of Trump's appointments. This is the first major case of Treason in US history. No precedent for this and cannot be compared to anything prior.

That was a blowjob. Not treason.

How can the supreme court invalidate the election? And why would the republican supreme court do it?

[djohn2oo8]

You two should get a room and have Sunday brunch after ya do it.

Trump should keep some KY in his cell.

[baseline bum]

Nor when Clinton was impeached.

He was never booted out of office like Nixon was about to be.

[Thread]

He was never booted out of office like Nixon was about to be.

Nonetheless, Clinton remains the lone duly elected U.S. President to be IMPEACHED.

Solly Cholly, you grew it, you chew it.

[djohn2oo8]

How can the supreme court invalidate the election? And why would the republican supreme court do it?
According to The Huffington Post, a 1995 Supreme Court decision suggests that the 2016 election could be invalidated.

Due to massive fraud that occurred during a state senate election in Pennsylvania, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a federal district judge to invalidate the election, remove the winner, and fill the vacancy with his opponent.

What set this case apart was the fact that two elected officials revealed under oath that they had been aware of the fraud but failed to enforce laws and attempted to hide the truth. A similar situation has occurred with regards to Russia’s interference in the 2016 election, since Republican Senator Mitch McConnell was reportedly aware of the CIA’s conclusion and did nothing but express “doubts about the veracity of the intelligence.

[Thread]

Trump should keep some KY in his cell.

You can send him the tube you & Recky are using this morning in that room at the Y. You sick fucks, I feel sorry for ya's.

[Thread]

According to The Huffington Post, a 1995 Supreme Court decision suggests that the 2016 election could be invalidated.

Due to massive fraud that occurred during a state senate election in Pennsylvania, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a federal district judge to invalidate the election, remove the winner, and fill the vacancy with his opponent.

What set this case apart was the fact that two elected officials revealed under oath that they had been aware of the fraud but failed to enforce laws and attempted to hide the truth. A similar situation has occurred with regards to Russia’s interference in the 2016 election, since Republican Senator Mitch McConnell was reportedly aware of the CIA’s conclusion and did nothing but express “doubts about the veracity of the intelligence.

He mopped the fuckin' floor with her fuckin' ass. Left her where he found her, dead in the ground.

Trump President. Not Clinton.

[djohn2oo8]

Oh and the Supreme Court being Republican has nothing to do with it as much as Trump has trashed the courts and called John Roberts a disaster.

[djohn2oo8]

He mopped the fuckin' floor with her fuckin' ass. Left her where he found her, dead in the ground.

Trump President. Not Clinton.

Trump Prison not Clinton.

[Thread]

Oh and the Supreme Court being Republican has nothing to do with it as much as Trump has trashed the courts and called John Roberts a disaster.

You got beat.

ha.

[Thread]

Trump Prison not Clinton.

Trump President. Not Clinton.

[Reck]

You can send him the tube you & Recky are using this morning in that room at the Y. You sick fucks, I feel sorry for ya's.

Says the guy who tells people to bend over so he can fuck 'em. :lol

[Reck]

He mopped the fuckin' floor with her fuckin' ass. Left her where he found her, dead in the ground.

Trump President. Not Clinton.

Winning by 70k votes is "mopping the floor" with someone? LOL

[Thread]

Says the guy who tells people to bend over so he can fuck 'em. :lol

At least I ain't in a room naked with dj like you are. You degenerates, you.

[Thread]

Winning by 70k votes is "mopping the floor" with someone? LOL

35k if you flip 'em.

He mopped the fuckin' floor with her fuckin' ass.

[djohn2oo8]

35k if you flip 'em.

Russia mopped the fuckin' floor with her fuckin' ass.

[djohn2oo8]

Not only will Trump leave office in shame. Cully will be directed to the reading room only to never leave.

[baseline bum]

Nonetheless, Clinton remains the lone duly elected U.S. President to be IMPEACHED.

Solly Cholly, you grew it, you chew it.

Nevertheless Nixon remains the lone duly elected US President to turn and run from the booting like you did with Charlie.

[baseline bum]

According to The Huffington Post, a 1995 Supreme Court decision suggests that the 2016 election could be invalidated.

Due to massive fraud that occurred during a state senate election in Pennsylvania, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a federal district judge to invalidate the election, remove the winner, and fill the vacancy with his opponent.

What set this case apart was the fact that two elected officials revealed under oath that they had been aware of the fraud but failed to enforce laws and attempted to hide the truth. A similar situation has occurred with regards to Russia’s interference in the 2016 election, since Republican Senator Mitch McConnell was reportedly aware of the CIA’s conclusion and did nothing but express “doubts about the veracity of the intelligence.

So the republican supreme court is going to make Clinton president?

[Thread]

Nevertheless Nixon remains the long duly elected US President to turn and run from the booting like you did with Charlie.

In the room with those two havin' a gd 3 some.

I'll be jiggered!!!

dj, bum, and recky homasexuals.

[Thread]

Not only will Trump leave office in shame. Cully will be directed to the reading room only to never leave.

- "Promises, promises."

- Ernie "The Cat" Ladd

[baseline bum]

In the room with those two havin' a gd 3 some.

I'll be jiggered!!!

dj, bum, and recky homasexuals.

Nevertheless Nixon remains the lone duly elected US President to turn and run from the booting like you did with Charlie.

[Thread]

Nevertheless Nixon remains the lone duly elected US President to turn and run from the booting like you did with Charlie.

dj, bum, and recky sittin' in a tree naked.

[djohn2oo8]

So the republican supreme court is going to make Clinton president?

Not out of the question. Or hold a special election. Just remember, the Constitution is untested on this. The SC lately has been striking down Republican efforts to suppress minority votes so nothing is trending in their favor especially with Roberts coming out against Trump's immigration ban. There is information yet to be made public about Russia/Trump that will absolutely lead to calls for invalidation. Pence will not be taking over. Nope.

[Thread]

Not out of the question. Or hold a special election. Just remember, the Constitution is untested on this. The SC lately has been striking down Republican efforts to suppress minority votes so nothing is trending in there favor especially with Roberts coming out against Trump's immigration ban. There is information yet to be made public about Russia/Trump that will absolutely lead to calls for invalidation. Pence will not be taking over.

You hadn't thought about Pence until I brought it up. Me. I said it first. Now you're all down in the dumps, mashin' the panic button.

Crawl, motherfucker, crawl!!!!!!!!!

P.S., you shortsighted little prick, you.

[djohn2oo8]

You hadn't thought about Pence until I brought it up. Me. I said it first. Now you're all down in the dumps, mashin' the panic button.

Crawl, motherfucker, crawl!!!!!!!!!

I addressed this many pages ago old man. Keep up.

[Thread]

I addressed this many pages ago old man. Keep up.

My ass. I lodged that in your peanut for a brain and now you're all upset at the thought.

We got the con, dj. And you can't stop us.

Trump President, then Pence. Not Clinton.

[djohn2oo8]

My ass. I lodged that in your peanut for a brain and now you're all upset at the thought.

We got the con, dj. And you can't stop us.

Trump President, then Pence. Not Clinton.

I'm not upset at anything. You were the one who first called Flynn being under investigation fake news. You were wrong then and you are wrong now. Let us proceed...

[boutons_deux]

SCOTUS is 5-4 for conservatives. They ain't gonna invalidate the election of their Useful Idiot Trash.

right-wing SCOTUS already compromised itself when it elected dubya because they said meeting the schedule of the Constitution was more important than counting votes and electing the right person.

Pootin and his mafiya are laughing their asses off at how they fucked up America by corrupting Repugs into treason, to the benefit and greater glory of Mother Russia.

C O V E R U P

[baseline bum]

dj, bum, and recky sittin' in a tree naked.

Nevertheless Nixon remains the lone duly elected US President to turn and run from the booting like you did with Charlie.

[djohn2oo8]

SCOTUS is 5-4 for conservatives. They ain't gonna invalidate the election of their Useful Idiot Trash.

right-wing SCOTUS already compromised itself when it elected dubya because they said meeting the schedule of the Constitution was more important than counting votes and electing the right person.

Pootin and his mafiya are laughing their asses off at how they fucked up America by corrupting Repugs into treason, to the benefit and greater glory of Mother Russia.

C O V E R U P

Gorsuch recused himself from gerrymandering cases. Roberts will recuse Gorsuch from Russia if he hasn't already.

[Reck]

Are any of the current SCOTUS as bad as Scalia? If not then it's possible. Is not like Trump is liked by the institutions.

[Thread]

Nevertheless Nixon remains the lone duly elected US President to turn and run from the booting like you did with Charlie.

Trump mopped the fuckin' floor with her fuckin' ass. Left her where he found her,,,dead in the ground.

Trump President. Not Clinton.

[Thread]

Are any of the current SCOTUS as bad as Scalia? If not then it's possible. Is not like Trump is liked by the institutions.

Of course not. We can't count on John Roberts, we know that. And this other asshole, Gorsuch, he's as vulnerable. He got all disheartened & demoralized because Trump questioned the judiciary in this country. He'll roll over the first opportunity he gets. We got ThomasPERIOD

[djohn2oo8]

871365959860224003
:lol

[spurraider21]

:lmao thinking they'll invalidate the election

[boutons_deux]

Gorsuch recused himself from gerrymandering cases. Roberts will recuse Gorsuch from Russia if he hasn't already.

Legislative Repugs "recused" are still working those cases, because they respect govt 100%.

When a SCOTUS judge is recused, that means not voting, does it also mean abstaining from backroom discussions?

[baseline bum]

Trump mopped the fuckin' floor with her fuckin' ass. Left her where he found her,,,dead in the ground.

Trump President. Not Clinton.

Nevertheless Nixon remains the lone duly elected US President to turn and run from the booting like you did with Charlie.

[baseline bum]

Are any of the current SCOTUS as bad as Scalia? If not then it's possible. Is not like Trump is liked by the institutions.

Gorsucks

[baseline bum]

:lmao thinking they'll invalidate the election

They're going to install Bernie as president, kick Gorsuch out, and then Bernie will nominate Obama to the open SC spot. And he'll get confirmed because the SC is also going to overturn the senate races in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina.

[TSA]

They're going to install Bernie as president, kick Gorsuch out, and then Bernie will nominate Obama to the open SC spot. And he'll get confirmed because the SC is also going to overturn the senate races in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina.

Claim multiple inside sources and post that on Mensch's twitter feed. Report back with the lol's.

[TSA]

871380434978041860


871380632852721664

:rollin

[Will Hunting]

They're going to install Bernie as president, kick Gorsuch out, and then Bernie will nominate Obama to the open SC spot. And he'll get confirmed because the SC is also going to overturn the senate races in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina.
Obama to the open spot? My sources tell me it's actually Elizabeth Warren :lol

[baseline bum]

Claim multiple inside sources and post that on Mensch's twitter feed. Report back with the lol's.

Obama is going to be the new grand marshal of the supreme court.

[djohn2oo8]

:lmao thinking they'll invalidate the election

Because precedent says they won't? Oh wait there is no precedent for a sitting President who has committed and still committing espionage and treason. Go wait in the corner for your hard evidence.

[baseline bum]

Because precedent says they won't? Oh wait there is no precedent for a sitting President who has committed and still committing espionage and treason. Go wait in the corner for your hard evidence.

The supreme court is just going to make it up as they go along?

[TSA]

Because precedent says they won't? Oh wait there is no precedent for a sitting President who has committed and still committing espionage and treason. Go wait in the corner for your hard evidence.

Not a single shred of evidence of collusion yet now you have proof of espionage AND treason? :lmao

[TSA]

The supreme court is just going to make it up as they go along?

Mensch will now have to revise her blog, again. Pesky facts keep ruining her "exclusives"

[djohn2oo8]

The supreme court is just going to make it up as they go along?

They would apply certain acts and clauses. Espionage act, guarantee clause etc.

[djohn2oo8]

Not a single shred of evidence of collusion yet now you have proof of espionage AND treason? :lmao

What's really funny Is you and Clapper have both been briefed on the same amount of intel. None. :lol

[TSA]

What's really funny Is you and Clapper have both been briefed on the same amount of intel. None. :lol

:lmao please share with us intel Louise Mensch has been briefed on :lmao

[baseline bum]

They would apply certain acts and clauses. Espionage act, guarantee clause etc. The case would have to be brought before them under those clauses.

So they invalidate the election and then what?

[djohn2oo8]

:lmao please share with us intel Louise Mensch has been briefed on :lmao

Share with me what she has been wrong about? Grand Juries? FISA warrants? oh wait those are actually real.

[TSA]

:rollin now Twitter is a Russian agent :rollin

871463951892172802
djohn2oo8 :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

So they invalidate the election and then what?

All of Trump's appointments would be null and void. Hatch would be the fill in President until a special election could be held.

[djohn2oo8]

TSA melting down again. (Grabs popcorn)

[TSA]

Share with me what she has been wrong about? Grand Juries? FISA warrants? oh wait those are actually real.

Share with you what she's been wrong on?!?! :lmao

She spent an entire weekend correcting and revising every single one of her "exclusives" :lmao

[baseline bum]

All of Trump's appointments would be null and void. Hatch would be the fill in President until a special election could be held.

???

Ryan is next in line.

[TSA]

All of Trump's appointments would be null and void. Hatch would be the fill in President until a special election could be held.

:lmao

[TSA]

???

Ryan is next in line.

No no no he's on tape committing treason :lmao

[spurraider21]

???

Ryan is next in line.dont you know ryan is going down too? he was caught on tape!

-djohn

[djohn2oo8]

???

Ryan is next in line.

You know Ryan is knee deep in this too right? That fucking idiot was taped also. He said himself he thinks Mcmullin released those transcripts.

[TSA]

dont you know ryan is going down too? he was caught on tape!

-djohn


BOOM

:lol

[TSA]

You know Ryan is knee deep in this too right? That fucking idiot was taped also. He said himself he thinks Mcmullin released those transcripts.

Beaten to your own punchline not once but twice. How does it feel? :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

dont you know ryan is going down too? he was caught on tape!

-djohn

865219732441628672

Hmm one transcript leaked...

[djohn2oo8]

Beaten to your own punchline not once but twice. How does it feel? :lmao

What was Mensch wrong about? GJ? FISA?

[AaronY]

They're going to install Bernie as president, kick Gorsuch out, and then Bernie will nominate Obama to the open SC spot. And he'll get confirmed because the SC is also going to overturn the senate races in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina.
:Lol

[AaronY]

According to The Huffington Post, a 1995 Supreme Court decision suggests that the 2016 election could be invalidated.

Due to massive fraud that occurred during a state senate election in Pennsylvania, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a federal district judge to invalidate the election, remove the winner, and fill the vacancy with his opponent.

What set this case apart was the fact that two elected officials revealed under oath that they had been aware of the fraud but failed to enforce laws and attempted to hide the truth. A similar situation has occurred with regards to Russia’s interference in the 2016 election, since Republican Senator Mitch McConnell was reportedly aware of the CIA’s conclusion and did nothing but express “doubts about the veracity of the intelligence.
Dear God bro

[AaronY]

Might be time to come up for air mayne

[spurraider21]

this is probably more absurd than randomguy's diminshed capacity shit

[baseline bum]

What was Mensch wrong about? GJ? FISA?

There was that part about the grand marshal of the supreme court initiating impeachment.

[djohn2oo8]

this is probably more absurd than randomguy's diminshed capacity shit

Kushner asked to use secret Russian comms. US has intercepted communications with Trump's people and Russia. So has US allies. Sessions had met secretly with Kislyak and lied about it three times. And what I'm saying about Ryan is absurd? :lol

Sit in the corner Raider fan.

[djohn2oo8]

There was that part about the grand marshal of the supreme court initiating impeachment.

You read it wrong my guy. She didn't say the supreme Court Marshal initiated impeachment. She said the Marshal of SC notified Trump of a case being drawn up by the House judiciary committee. Which yes, the President is required to be notified of.

[spurraider21]

Kushner asked to use secret Russian comms. US has intercepted communications with Trump's people and Russia. So has US allies. Sessions had met secretly with Kislyak and lied about it three times. And what I'm saying about Ryan is absurd? :lol

Sit in the corner Raider fan.no, your theory that the entire GOP is going down and there's going to be a mass exodus in government. that's the absurdity

[djohn2oo8]

no, your theory that the entire GOP is going down and there's going to be a mass exodus in government. that's the absurdity

No the absurdity is how many Republicans have taken money from Russia for their campaigns and cheered at the firing of Comey.

[baseline bum]

No the absurdity is how many Republicans have taken money from Russia for their campaigns and cheered at the firing of Comey.

How many Republicans have taken money from Russia for their campaigns and cheered at the firing of Comey?

[DarrinS]

:corn:

[djohn2oo8]

Funny. Why would Trump's lawyers be researching impeachment? Hmmm...

http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/19/politics/donald-trump-white-house-lawyers-research-impeachment/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_allpolitics+%28RSS% 3A+CNN+-+Politics%29

[TSA]

There was that part about the grand marshal of the supreme court initiating impeachment.

And the FISC court convening grand juries :rollin

If she didn't have so many errors I'd post them all but it's too time consuming

[djohn2oo8]

And the FISC court convening grand juries :rollin

If she didn't have so many errors I'd post them all but it's too time consuming


Funny. Why would Trump's lawyers be researching impeachment? Hmmm...

http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/19/politics/donald-trump-white-house-lawyers-research-impeachment/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_allpolitics+%28RSS% 3A+CNN+-+Politics%29

[TSA]

Funny. Why would Trump's lawyers be researching impeachment? Hmmm...

http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/19/politics/donald-trump-white-house-lawyers-research-impeachment/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_allpolitics+%28RSS% 3A+CNN+-+Politics%29

"The White House originally did not comment for this story. After publication, a White House official said "it's not true" that White House lawyers are researching impeachment procedures.

One outside attorney close to the office of White House counsel Don McGahn cast doubt on impeachment preparations, saying it wouldn't be something McGahn would authorize."

:lol CNN

[djohn2oo8]

"The White House originally did not comment for this story. After publication, a White House official said "it's not true" that White House lawyers are researching impeachment procedures.

One outside attorney close to the office of White House counsel Don McGahn cast doubt on impeachment preparations, saying it wouldn't be something McGahn would authorize."

:lol CNN

Which means it is true :lmao
Why not comment before publication? :lol

[djohn2oo8]

White House lawyers have begun researching impeachment procedures in an effort to prepare for what officials still believe is a distant possibility that President Donald Trump could have to fend off attempts to remove him from office, two people briefed on the discussions tell CNN.

[TSA]

It must be true, two people told CNN

[Thread]

Nevertheless Nixon remains the lone duly elected US President to turn and run from the booting like you did with Charlie.

He mopped the fuckin' floor with her fuckin' azz. Left her where he found her.........dead in the ground.

[baseline bum]

He mopped the fuckin' floor with her fuckin' azz. Left her where he found her.........dead in the ground.

Nevertheless Nixon remains the lone duly elected US President to turn and run from the booting like you did with Charlie.

[Thread]

He mopped the fuckin' floor with her fuckin' azz. Left her where he found her.........dead in the ground.

[baseline bum]

He mopped the fuckin' floor with her fuckin' azz. Left her where he found her.........dead in the ground.

Nevertheless Nixon remains the lone duly elected US President to turn and run from the booting like you did with Charlie

[AaronY]

It must be true, two people told CNN
Dude, were all having fun with djohn here but remember you're the pizzagate guy..never forget that..when it comes to wishcasting you might even be worse.

[TSA]

Dude, were all having fun with djohn here but remember you're the pizzagate guy..never forget that..when it comes to wishcasting you might even be worse.

You won't find me claiming a single person is about to be indicted in that thread.

[Reck]

You're right. You only re-posted what Fox's talking heads were saying about Hillary about to get indicted and what not. :lol

But but Andrew Napolitano says she will. :cry

[AaronY]

You won't find me claiming a single person is about to be indicted in that thread.
No, your posts in that thread were very reasoned and rational for sure. Not even embarrassing in the slightest. Thread was filled with solid investigative work and you came off like a modern Sherlock Holmes. You should be proud of it imo

[TSA]

No, your posts in that thread were very reasoned and rational for sure. Not even embarrassing in the slightest. Thread was filled with solid investigative work and you came off like a modern Sherlock Holmes. You should be proud of it imo

Despite your sarcasm you are actually correct as I sifted what I found the most credible and shared it. Don't believe me head on over to voat/pizzagate and see all the bullshit I had to wade through.

But enough about me, like you, I'm here in this thread to laugh at djohn.

[baseline bum]

Despite your sarcasm you are actually correct as I sifted what I found the most credible and shared it. Don't believe me head on over to voat/pizzagate and see all the bullshit I had to wade through.

But enough about me, like you, I'm here in this thread to laugh at djohn.

No thanks, already enough bullshit to wade through in your thread.

[Reck]

No thanks, already enough bullshit to wade through in your thread.

You mean you dont want to go to 4chan and get a potential STD on your computer/mobile? Good call. :tu

[monosylab1k]

You won't find me claiming a single person is about to be indicted in that thread.

Uhhhh you've got an ELE bet with me where you're banking on exactly that happening :lol

[boutons_deux]

C O V E R U P !
... so fucking blatant, they are all hiding their ethical violations (ethics? Repugs? NEVER! :lol ), crimes, even treason

behind LIES, LIES, LIES

[Spurminator]

Assange released more than enough for the DOJ to indict Hillary.

[AaronY]

Yeah it's a good thing you curated that pizzagate material tsa. Wouldn't want anything crazy or stupid ending up in that thread.

[TSA]

Uhhhh you've got an ELE bet with me where you're banking on exactly that happening :lol

I consider a single ELE bet different than claiming every member of the GOP is going down on a daily basis.

I don't even remember our ELE bet :lol Refresh me on our terms.

[TSA]

Assange released more than enough for the DOJ to indict Hillary

That isn't me claiming an indictment is imminent what is your point?

[Reck]

You're right. You only re-posted what Fox's talking heads were saying about Hillary about to get indicted and what not. :lol

But but Andrew Napolitano says she will. :cry

Like I said, the cuck uses other people's claims as an out when things dont go as planned. Such beta move.

[spurraider21]

Despite your sarcasm you are actually correct as I sifted what I found the most credible and shared it. Don't believe me head on over to voat/pizzagate and see all the bullshit I had to wade through.

But enough about me, like you, I'm here in this thread to laugh at djohn.
We're all grateful that you filtered out the crazy parts and let us know about spirit cooking

[TSA]

We're all grateful that you filtered out the crazy parts and let us know about spirit cooking

It's just art bro :bobo

[spurraider21]

It's just art bro :bobo
:cry i cant believe you're making fun of the slaughtered animals used in spirit cooking :cry

best of luck in life to you

[TSA]

:cry i cant believe you're making fun of the slaughtered animals used in spirit cooking :cry

best of luck in life to you

:bobo

[djohn2oo8]

871753925266997249

[djohn2oo8]

871761178858577920

[djohn2oo8]

871778030666084352

[djohn2oo8]

871759231338336261
:lol

[TSA]

djohn you've got to open the mornings with a BOOM tweet. This shit was weak and I've come to expect more from you.

[RandomGuy]

Michael Flynn To Turn Over Some Subpoenaed Documents To Senate Committee


Former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn will give the Senate Intelligence Committee the documents demanded in a revised subpoena for his business records, as part of the committee's investigation into Russia's interference with the 2016 presidential race.

Earlier, Flynn had refused to cooperate with a broader subpoena that included his personal documents, citing his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

A source close to Flynn tells NPR's Mary Louise Kelly that "we agree he cannot invoke the Fifth Amendment with respect to business records, so he will produce those."

The chairman and vice chairman of the committee, Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., and Mark Warner, D-Va., said last week they had demanded documents from Flynn's businesses, Flynn Intel Group Inc. and Flynn Intel Group LLC. Flynn communicated with Russian officials while an adviser to President Trump's campaign and transition, and discussed U.S. sanctions against the country with those contacts.

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/05/30/530811509/michael-flynn-to-turn-over-some-subpoenaed-documents-to-senate-committee

[boutons_deux]

So Flynn is SAYING OUT LOUD that his "personal" documents incriminate him? :lol

[DarrinS]

871792760768131073

[Thread]

871792760768131073

I would've. Just to redden that ass.

[baseline bum]

I would've. Just to redden that ass.

Bend over. I'll redden that ass.

[Reck]

871792760768131073

He couldn't anyways. Once he fired Comey and talked tapes, he was fair game.

Now its time to shit bricks as he watches Comey tear into that ass.

[Thread]

He couldn't anyways. Once he fired Comey and talked tapes, he was fair game.

Now its time to shit bricks as he watches Comey tear into that ass.

Just another disgruntled ex-employee...without a gun.

[florige]

He couldn't anyways. Once he fired Comey and talked tapes, he was fair game.

Now its time to shit bricks as he watches Comey tear into that ass.


Whoever is in charge of Twitter bandwidth that day had better be working overtime. Trump will probably crash Twitter with all the tweets he will be putting out during Comey's testimony.

[clambake]

no, he's still busy mopping the floor.

must be a hell of a floor.

[TSA]

Whoever is in charge of Twitter bandwidth that day had better be working overtime. Trump will probably crash Twitter with all the tweets he will be putting out during Comey's testimony.

Not even close. This will be the account to crash Twitter during the hearing.

https://twitter.com/LouiseMensch?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eser p%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor

[Reck]

http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/336422-russian-intelligence-hacked-voting-systems-maker-spearphished-its

Then read this beauty of a capper.
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/336432-federal-government-contractor-charged-for-leaking-classified-material

Welp. Get in here djohn2oo8 baseline bum florige RandomGuy

[RandomGuy]

Flynn is not in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions as the thread title implies, the FBI has already cleared him of his phone calls to Kislyak. I've never denied he took money from Turkey.

Of course I'm going to stick to "where's the evidence" because as of today there is ZERO evidence of collusion with Russia. How many more Democratic members of the intel committee need to say the same before you start realizing there is nothing there?


Your honor, there is no evidence my client killed his wife, so there is absolutely no need to search my house and truck, and we can stop with this entire investigations which is based on some conspiracy theory, and no, that is definitely NOT blood on his shoes.

:lol

[RandomGuy]

http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/336422-russian-intelligence-hacked-voting-systems-maker-spearphished-its

Then read this beauty of a capper.
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/336432-federal-government-contractor-charged-for-leaking-classified-material

Welp. Get in here djohn2oo8 baseline bum florige RandomGuy

But, but, but Crowdstrike said something wrong about Ukrainian artillery!

[RandomGuy]

https://pics.me.me/first-of-all-the-reports-oftheso-called-death-star-are-fake-19281557.png

[RandomGuy]

On a completely unrelated, random note, here is a fire pit welded to look like the Death Star. $1500 (shippling incl) and its yours.

https://img0.etsystatic.com/101/0/10476103/isla_280x280.16795840_sh822ved.jpg

https://www.etsy.com/shop/KGFirePits?ref=l2-shop-header-avatar

Me wants.

[TSA]

But, but, but Crowdstrike said something wrong about Ukrainian artillery!

Neither of those articles have anything to do with Crowdstrike.

[boutons_deux]

Is it possible Trump and some of his associates are guilty of treason?

These wars, while bloody and costly, were never fought by enemies that had a realistic chance of destroying America.

There is one country the United States has faced for decades but never directly fought in a formal war (http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/166030). Russia, in its former state of the Soviet Union or its present form of neo-imperialist state under the de facto dictatorship of Putin, was our opponent in the long struggle of the Cold War and remains our fiercest and most dangerous adversary.

What makes Russia different from any foe the United States has ever faced in its history is that Russia alone of all of them could actually destroy America.

This reality truly puts the Trump Russian scandal in perspective.

This is more than another shady real estate scheme to build another vulgar hotel or apartment building, the architectural equivalents of a black velvet painting. :lol :lol :lol

The numerous and expanding pieces of evidence of the

Trump camp to pander to Russia and Putin and subvert our laws constitute a real threat to the security of the United States.

So far Michael Flynn, Jeff Sessions, Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner have lied or concealed their contacts with Russian interests.

Several have received substantial cash payments from Russia.

The Republican Party platform was altered by Trump to remove the condemnation of Russian aggression against the Ukraine.

Trump brought the Russian foreign minister and the ambassador/spymaster into the Oval Office and revealed the most secret intelligence to them as the Russian news agency Tass photographed the smile fest while American media were barred from the meeting.

In his recent trip to NATO headquarters Trump trashed our allies to their faces,

the grabbing and pushing aside the prime minister of Montenegro more than symbolic.

And when confronted with the softest of all softball questions ever asked of any president, Trump declined to criticize Putin instead declaring we are no better than the Russians.

The weakening of NATO, the alliance that is most responsible for deterring war, is a victory for Russia and a massive return on its investment hacking and manipulating the election in Trump’s favor.

The capper, at least so far in this mile a minute story, is

the blatant attempt to cover up the scandal in thinly disguised coercion of the FBI and the intelligence agencies.

This has gone beyond bad policy or bad judgment.

This is conduct bordering on treason, defined in the Constitution in Article III section 3 as “adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.”

Treason is not a charge to be made lightly but the growing body of evidence makes its case day by day.

This is no longer politics.

This is not a game.

This is a real and substantial threat to the nation.

The Trump presidency must be stopped immediately before it is too late.

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/06/is-it-possible-trump-and-some-of-his-associates-are-guilty-of-treason/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

and yet, the Repugs DO NOTHING but fellate Trash in craven, abject loyalty.

[djohn2oo8]

Money laundering subpoenas have been handed down...

[djohn2oo8]

872140858224771072

[TSA]

872140858224771072

What effect did these "hacks" have on the election?

[TSA]

Money laundering subpoenas have been handed down...

:lol why are you embarrased to link the tweet you read?

[TSA]

Former acting director of the CIA, Michael Morell

"The White House is again defending itself against allegations made in news reports, this time concerning the Washington Post’s story on Friday that President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner – who currently serves as the President’s senior adviser – met with Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak in December to discuss establishing back channel communications between the transition team and the Kremlin.

At his daily press briefing on Tuesday, Sean Spicer deflected questions about the latest revelations, saying, "What your question assumes is a lot of facts that are not substantiated by anything but anonymous sources."

Even when asked about President Trump’s retweet a few hours earlier of a Fox News report about how Kushner and Kislyak discussed a back channel, a story that quoted anonymous sources, Spicer responded, “I’m not going to get into confirming stuff; there’s an ongoing investigation.”

The Cipher Brief asked former Acting and Deputy CIA Director Michael Morell to give his assessment of this latest news report.

The Cipher Brief: Put this controversy over Jared Kushner’s contacts with Russian officials during the transition in context. Contacts between foreign officials and an incoming administration are common. What makes this different?

Michael Morell: Let me say right up front that I look at this issue – Kushner’s contacts with the Russians – as well as the broader issue of Trump associates’ contacts with the Russians from the perspective of an intelligence analyst. When I do that, there are a couple of important caveats with which I have to start. The first is that we do not fully understand the facts. For the most part – and please stay with me here – what we, the public, know is what the media has reported, that unnamed former and current government officials have told them what the Russians said to each other about what happened in meetings with Trump associates. That is not a sourcing chain in which I would put a great deal of confidence. I spent a career watching the media get a significant portion of intelligence-related stories wrong. So, the bottom line: we should all be very careful in saying what is a fact on which to base analysis here. The real facts may be different.

The second caveat is that we all need to be careful not to draw overarching conclusions from one data point – even if we think that data point is correct – or, even more importantly, we need to be careful that we don’t over-connect the dots. This latter point is particularly important. There are essentially two types of intelligence failures – One, under connecting the dots, not seeing what is there (Japan’s intent to attack Pearl Harbor is the best example) and two, over connecting the dots, seeing things that really are not there (Iraq WMD being the classic example). There are so many “facts” in the public domain now that many people are connecting them in a way that has them concluding the Trump campaign must have been guilty of conspiring with the Russians in a way that would be a violation of the law. It is way too early to come to that conclusion.

TCB: What did you first think when you heard Kushner allegedly was setting up a back channel for communications with Russia. What significance does the location – at Russian diplomatic facilities – hold?

MM: First, let me just say that I think “back-channel” is the wrong term. I know everyone is using it, but it is not quite right. Both the Washington Post, which broke the story, and the New York Times in its initial story said that Kushner – along with then National Security Advisor Designate Michael Flynn – met with Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak for the purpose of setting up a “secret channel” for Flynn to talk to the Russians about Syria and other issues. That is not a back channel. That is a “front channel” – the incoming national security advisor talking with the Russian government. Why does it matter what we call it? Because somehow, “back channel” has a more nefarious connotation than “front channel.”

When I heard the initial story, I had a few reactions:

--This is as much about Flynn as it is about Kushner. Flynn was in the meeting. The media story is focused on Kushner because he is still a senior advisor to the President, while Flynn is not.

--Reaching out to the Russians during the transition is not necessarily a crime. It may be bad policy, but it is not necessarily a crime. I thought “Okay, something else to be investigated, but certainly not a smoking gun.” Whether a crime was committed, of course, depends entirely on the intent of the outreach and on what was discussed and decided – all of which we do not know with any degree of certainty.

--I wanted, and still want, to know two things: One, why the request for secrecy? Why the request for the use of the Russian Embassy’s secure communications? There are potential answers to those questions that would leave me saying “Okay, I understand. It was not smart to ask, but I get it and it is okay.” And there are potential answers to those questions that would leave me saying, “Put that at the top of the FBI’s list.” And two, was the Kushner/Flynn outreach coordinated within the transition? Was the president-elect aware? Was the vice-president elect, then the head of the transition, aware? Were other senior members of the transition aware? There is a big difference, in my mind, between a “yes” and a “no” on these questions.

But, most important, I said to myself that I am much more interested in what Trump’s associates, including Kushner, said to the Russians before the election than I am after the election – because I want to know if anyone in the Trump camp conspired with the Russians in their interference in our election. In fact, I’m primarily interested in the latter with regard to how it informs the former.

TCB: Why would Kushner even attempt to set up a back channel?

MM: I don’t know. It might be completely benign – “Let’s talk about how we can better coordinate our approaches to Syria.” But, it also might be malign – something with an implicit message that made clear, “Given the help you gave us over the years, it is now time for us to help you.”

TCB: Is it possible the Russians were using this as an opportunity to manipulate or misinform the incoming Trump team? If so, what precautions should U.S. officials have taken to counter such an attempt?

MM: Of course. The Russians do that with nearly every significant foreign official they meet, and transition officials would be no different in this regard from currently serving U.S. government officials. The best precaution is not not to talk to them. The best precaution is to be aware of their influence efforts, to be careful in your conversations, and to be willing to share your exact conversation with people in the government who pay attention to Russian influence efforts (if you think that has happened to you).

TCB: Former CIA Director Mike Hayden said “this was off the map.” Do you agree?

MM: I don’t know what Mike meant by that, but I assume he was talking about the request for secrecy. If so, I will just repeat what I said earlier. That is the key piece of this of which we need to have a much better understanding and a piece of this that needs further investigation.

By the way, I do think that there are four broad areas that need to be investigated with regard to Trump and the Russians. I hope Bob Mueller, the new Special Counsel, is looking at all of these issues.

First, did anyone in the Trump camp conspire with the Russians in Moscow’s interference in our election? Did they knowingly assist the Russians in that effort? If so, did Trump know about it at the time or did he learn about it later and take steps to cover it up? And, if so, did the Trump folks promise a softer U.S. approach to Russia as a quid pro quo?
Second, did Russian organized crime launder money through the Trump Organization? If so, was anyone in the Trump Organization aware of that? If so, was Trump himself aware? And, if so, was the soft approach to Russian during the campaign and the transition a quid pro quo? If the money laundering occurred and the Trump Organization was not aware, should they have been? In other words, did the Trump Organization do the due diligence that is required of them by law to have an understanding of where foreign money is coming from?
Third, is anyone who is serving in the Trump Administration, particularly someone who has access to classified information, a witting agent of Russian intelligence? And, if so, are they now working to advance Russian rather than U.S. interests – either by providing classified information to Moscow or by pushing for U.S. policies that Moscow wants?
And, fourth, did the President obstruct justice when he reportedly asked for Jim Comey’s loyalty, when he reportedly asked Comey to back off the Flynn investigation, or when he fired Comey?

All of these are huge questions that need to be answered. Certainly, it is really hard to understand what circumstance would lead the President-elect’s team to be perfectly comfortable being utterly transparent with the Russians, so much so that they ask our long-time enemy for help, hiding whatever they are doing from the U.S. Government. Sure sounds suspect, if it’s true.

But, my overall point in our conversation here today is that we should not jump to conclusions on any of this. We should let the Special Counsel do his work and come to a conclusion. We should not let the media take us to a conclusion.

TCB: If you agree, do you think this was a result of Kushner’s lack of experience, naiveté, something more nefarious?

MM: Again, I don’t know. And it is the significance of the spectrum you just outlined that means this requires further investigation. There is one aspect of the request that I found odd – simply asking Kisylak to be the middle man between Flynn and the Russian military would have accomplished the same goal, as the Embassy would have used its secure communications channels to report those conversations. So, naiveté is not out of the question.

TCB: Former NSA Michael Flynn, a long time intelligence official, was reportedly with Kushner. Doesn’t that rule naiveté out?

MM: Again, hard to say. Possibly yes, for obvious reasons – Flynn should know better, right? But possibly no – possibly Kushner raised the secure communications idea out of naiveté, and Flynn did not want to correct him in front of Kisylak. If so, bad decision by Flynn.

TCB: You mentioned the media. Can you elaborate?

MM: Sure. I do think that Trump’s performance as President has been quite poor. But, I do think that the President is right to say there is a bias among some in the media. I see it everyday when I read the papers and see how things are being reported. And, I think this is a big deal.

You know when Hugo Chavez was first elected President in Venezuela in 1998, there was no political opposition of which to speak. The opposition was in disarray. There was no opposition leader to stand up and provide an alternative vision to that being pursued by Chavez. In its place, the Venezuelan media became the political opposition. And, in so doing, the media lost its credibility with the Venezuelan people. It was a huge loss for Venezuela.

That is a risk right here in America, right now. I believe that objective, fact-based journalism has never been as important as it is today to the future of our democracy. But, in order to be effective, journalists cannot take sides or even appear to take sides. It is only about our future.

https://thecipherbrief.com/column/expert-view/dont-over-connect-dots-jared-kushners-russia-dealings-1095

[djohn2oo8]

:lol why are you embarrased to link the tweet you read?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/four-top-law-firms-turned-requests-represent-trump-122423972.html

7th Paragraph

[djohn2oo8]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/four-top-law-firms-turned-requests-represent-trump-122423972.html

7th Paragraph
Others mentioned potential conflicts with clients of their firms, such as financial institutions that have already received subpoenas relating to potential money-laundering issues that are part of the investigation.

[TSA]

Others mentioned potential conflicts with clients of their firms, such as financial institutions that have already received subpoenas relating to potential money-laundering issues that are part of the investigation.

You should have just posted that the first time instead of trying to muddy the waters like you tried to do.

[Pavlov]

Seth Rich die in muddy water?

[boutons_deux]

Former acting director of the CIA, Michael Morell

https://thecipherbrief.com/column/expert-view/dont-over-connect-dots-jared-kushners-russia-dealings-1095

I guess this asshole had no problem with "media bias" by Fox or other conservative media promoting Trash every hour of the day since the escalator, nor $Bs in media exposure from all media.

Trash is a fucking disaster, a sick person, Pootin's compromised BFF, as are many of Trash's entourgage, and then there is the BLATANT COVERUP.

It's not media bias to point that out. IT'S FUCKING FACTS.

[ducks]

Former FBI Director James Comey will be forthcoming when he testifies before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday morning, but he will stop short of saying President Donald Trump tried to interfere in the agency's investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn, according to an ABC News exclusive

[DarrinS]

Former FBI Director James Comey will be forthcoming when he testifies before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday morning, but he will stop short of saying President Donald Trump tried to interfere in the agency's investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn, according to an ABC News exclusive

But, but, but, the memos.

[boutons_deux]

Will Pootin's Repug boytoys make any comment?

Russian fighter jet scrambled to intercept American B-52 bomber over Baltic Sea

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/813641/Russia-America-United-States-Donald-Trump-Vladimir-Putin-defence-Baltic-Sea

[djohn2oo8]

CROFL Sessions offering to resign.

[Trill Clinton]

CROFL Sessions offering to resign.

http://www.thecoli.com/media/bischoff-wow.2871/full

[djohn2oo8]

872239801063399424

[djohn2oo8]

872240323354923009

[djohn2oo8]

872240970032717824

[djohn2oo8]

872239913667788801

[ducks]

Kyle is a kind he knows nothing

[djohn2oo8]

ducks knows nothing

[Reck]

CROFL Sessions offering to resign.

Why offered and not just do it?

[Reck]

But, but, but, the memos.

Umm Comey is not going to derail the investigation Mueller is doing. Saying that the memos exist and that Mueller has them is enough.

:lol Darrins thinking Trump is home free.

[djohn2oo8]

Why offered and not just do it?

Who knows but that story just broke about an hour ago. Pretty fresh still.

[djohn2oo8]

872243858071015424
Bombshells. Bombshells everywhere.

[djohn2oo8]

872245553924628480
:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

872241704212078592

[TSA]

872239913667788801

Oh my lord :rollin

[djohn2oo8]

Oh my lord :rollin

Trump = fucked.

[djohn2oo8]

872244898086477824

[Reck]

Trump = fucked.

Djohn, what did you do to this guy? Must have gave him good dick because he won't stop humping your leg. :lmao

[TSA]

Trump = fucked.

Haven't you learned after 200 pages of this shit that the more the CIA I mean WaPo leaks the more nothing actually comes of it?

Trumps fine. Comey's testimony is going to be a huge let down for you as he's just trying to cover his own ass now. His earlier testimony could come back to bite him.

[DarrinS]

Comey's testimony will be like Rachel Maddow's scoop on Trump's ancient tax returns.

[djohn2oo8]

Haven't you learned after 200 pages of this shit that the more the CIA I mean WaPo leaks the more nothing actually comes of it?

Trumps fine. Comey's testimony is going to be a huge let down for you as he's just trying to cover his own ass now. His earlier testimony could come back to bite him.

Trump tried to influence the FBI to end their investigation. Did he do that for Hillary? :lol

Oh no he did that when is own ass is on the line. He is FUCKED!

[djohn2oo8]

Comey's testimony will be like Rachel Maddow's scoop on Trump's ancient tax returns.

What about his testimony in private? :lol

[djohn2oo8]

Haven't you learned after 200 pages of this shit that the more the CIA I mean WaPo leaks the more nothing actually comes of it?

Trumps fine. Comey's testimony is going to be a huge let down for you as he's just trying to cover his own ass now. His earlier testimony could come back to bite him.

You might want to pay attention to Rogers' first tomorrow.

[Reck]

Comey's testimony will be like Rachel Maddow's scoop on Trump's ancient tax returns.

I believe this is the same line of thinking his rabid supporters had when he first testified back in March when he dropped the mic saying he was investigating Trump and his people.

[djohn2oo8]

Djohn, what did you do to this guy? Must have gave him good dick because he won't stop humping your leg. :lmao

Guy has been wrong about everything and lost an account behind it. When this is all over and i'm right yet again I'm gonna tell him to drop his draws for daddeh :lol

[DarrinS]

I believe this is the same line of thinking his rabid supporters had when he first testified back in March when he dropped the mic saying he was investigating Trump and his people.

I guess we'll find out on Thursday.

[TSA]

Guy has been wrong about everything and lost an account behind it. When this is all over and i'm right yet again I'm gonna tell him to drop his draws for daddeh :lol

You have a 200 fucking page thread and have claimed at least 20 people would be indicted and charged by now. Add that to all your orlther wild claims and you're batting a solid .025
Yeah you keep doing you and you keep being right you delusional fuck :rollin

[TSA]

You might want to pay attention to Rogers' first tomorrow.

The same Rogers who secretly met with Trump and was pressured to be fired by Obama admin
Yeah real worried about testimony from the guy who most likely told Trump that Obama had him under surveillance

[djohn2oo8]

You have a 200 fucking page thread and have claimed at least 20 people would be indicted and charged by now. Add that to all your orlther wild claims and you're batting a solid .025
Yeah you keep doing you and you keep being right you delusional fuck :rollin

I can see it, you are defeated. You know what's coming g and it ain't good for Agent Orange

http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/victory.gif

[djohn2oo8]

872259294451961861

[boutons_deux]

It sure sounds like Trash will let Sessions walk after Sessions was "disloyal" and recused himself ( not really ) from the Russian shit.

Sessions, nation's top cop, LIED to Congress. Repugs let it slide.

[djohn2oo8]

872284555918491648

[djohn2oo8]

872285053904015360
lol TSA's one hope was Ethering Trump

[djohn2oo8]

872286776387190784

[djohn2oo8]

872244039617216514

[DarrinS]

872286776387190784

He said that publicly.

[djohn2oo8]

He said that publicly.

He also said it in private. And asked him too to shut down the dossier.

[DarrinS]

He also said it in private. And asked him too to shut down the dossier.

Oooh, the infamous dossier. :lol

[Reck]

Oooh, the infamous dossier. :lol

I dont know what's so funny. That same dossier was used to kick start the Trump FBI investigation.

[RandomGuy]

What effect did these "hacks" have on the election?

The reports show a probing of the system.

The US election system is too decentralized to really effectively target on large scale.

That said, it is vulnerable to electoral college shenanigans. 80000 votes in 3 states is all it took for the Golfer-in-Chief to be able to waste our money on protecting him while he doesn't work.

[DarrinS]

Clapper's Watergate comparison

Watch the literal facepalm


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3v2LEmG46E

[RandomGuy]

Clapper's Watergate comparison

Watch the literal facepalm



The thing that gets people in trouble is obstruction of justice Darrin.

Do you know what that is?

[RandomGuy]

The nation’s top intelligence official told associates in March that President Trump asked him if he could intervene with then-FBI Director James B. Comey to get the bureau to back off its focus on former national security adviser Michael Flynn in its Russia probe, according to officials.

On March 22, less than a week after being confirmed by the Senate, Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats attended a briefing at the White House together with officials from several government agencies. As the briefing was wrapping up, Trump asked everyone to leave the room except for Coats and CIA Director Mike Pompeo.

The president then started complaining about the FBI investigation and Comey’s handling of it, said officials familiar with the account Coats gave to associates. Two days earlier, Comey had confirmed in a congressional hearing that the bureau was probing whether Trump’s campaign coordinated with Russia during the 2016 race.

[Inside Trump’s anger and impatience — and his sudden decision to fire Comey]

After the encounter, Coats discussed the conversation with other officials and decided that intervening with Comey as Trump had suggested would be inappropriate, according to officials who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive internal matters.

[boutons_deux]

"The thing that gets people in trouble is obstruction of justice"

In Trash's case, it's both the crime and obstruction.

Trash's obstruction, firing 3 people investigating him, etc, and so many of Trash's entourage not admitting on security clearance forms, and "forgetting" meetings with Russians, is all the proof I need that there is serious crime being hidden.

Nixon's crime was also equal to his obstruction.

btw, if Russians cracked Qatar state news agency, planted "fake news" that precipitated the current crisis, why would Russians bother?

Because turmoil, disunity in the M/E pushes up the price of oil, where oil is Pootin's main source of hard USD, along with natgas sold to Europe, while the ruble has collapsed into near worthlessness and the Russian economy is in shambles.

Did all y'all Trash fellators notice that Pootin's BFF boytoy lapdog Trash claimed responsibility for the Pootin-favorable Qatar situation? Apparently when he was in M/E recently, he pushed Saudis, etc to break with Qatar, doing Pootin's bidding.

[djohn2oo8]

872438901746659328

[AaronY]

872438901746659328
Boomshakalaka wagwan RIP Trump post #2,222 of the thread now. Bury him he's done. Mark it zero, over the line etc.

[boutons_deux]

Boomshakalaka wagwan RIP Trump post #2,222 of the thread now. Bury him he's done. Mark it zero, over the line etc.

House Repugs will vote down Dem articles of impeachment. gameover

[boutons_deux]

Russia’s Last-Minute Hacking Was Meant to Burn President Hillary

Russian hacks sought to undermine Hillary Clinton and cast doubt on the legitimacy of American democracy. Now President Trump is struggling with the validity of his win.

The Kremlin sought instead to create the perception amongst Americans that the election may not be authentic in order to push their secondary election effort—undermine the mandate of Hillary Clinton to govern should she win.

Trump’s supporters chanted Kremlin-created or promoted themes regarding Clinton’s lost emails, fictitious health problems (https://www.rt.com/usa/355047-clinton-stairs-health-problem/) and alleged corruption.

Despite the success of Russia’s hacking empowered influence efforts, polling showed a Trump campaign destined for defeat after the political party conventions of July 2016. So much so, the Kremlin sought an alternative, second tack to undermine American democracy by sowing chaos and conspiracy.

If Putin couldn’t get his preferred choice into the White House, he wanted to discredit Clinton and degrade the authenticity of democracy such that Americans believed their votes didn’t count and the Democrats framed the election.

Then-candidate Trump echoed these allegations (http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/21/politics/trump-rigged-election-claim-global/) repeatedly and so frequently that when he did win in November, his rhetoric in many ways brought doubt to the authenticity of his own victory.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/russias-last-minute-hacking-was-to-burn-president-hillary

Still doesn't answer why Trash loves Pootin, and why so many of his entourage engaged Pootin's boys.

[AaronY]

House Repugs will vote down Dem articles of impeachment. gameover
Of course dude